15
STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES

1

Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

Page 2: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES

2

Relatively Mild Storm EnvironmentWind 90 knotsWave 9 meterCurrent 2 knots

Very soft clay soil

Very Active Seismic Area

Relatively Mild Storm EnvironmentWind 90 knotsWave 9 meterCurrent 2 knots

Very soft clay soil

Very Active Seismic Area

Page 3: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES

3

Mat Supported Jack-UpBuilt in Late 1970’s

Converted for Gas ProductionMadura - Indonesia

Fixed Platform Design Requirements

ABS Class Rules

Mat Supported Jack-UpBuilt in Late 1970’s

Converted for Gas ProductionMadura - Indonesia

Fixed Platform Design Requirements

ABS Class Rules

Page 4: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES

4

Initial Sea Bed Mat Penetration Larger than Predicted

Soil Strengths Questioned

Method of Predicting Overturning Resistance Questioned

Initial Sea Bed Mat Penetration Larger than Predicted

Soil Strengths Questioned

Method of Predicting Overturning Resistance Questioned

Page 5: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES

5

Very Detailed Site Investigation of Mat-Effected Zone

In Situ Soil Strength MeasurmetsCPT + T-Bar + Vane

Method of Predicting Overturning Resistance Re-Visited

Very Detailed Site Investigation of Mat-Effected Zone

In Situ Soil Strength MeasurmetsCPT + T-Bar + Vane

Method of Predicting Overturning Resistance Re-Visited

Page 6: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES

6

Don Murff, Consultant to GEMS

Alan Young, GEMSDan Spikula, GEMS

Jean Audibert, Quest Geo-Technics

Jack Templeton, Sage USA

Vladimir Rapoport, Consultant

Don Murff, Consultant to GEMS

Alan Young, GEMSDan Spikula, GEMS

Jean Audibert, Quest Geo-Technics

Jack Templeton, Sage USA

Vladimir Rapoport, Consultant

Page 7: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

COL1

COL3

COL2

1

BH1

BH2 BH3

BH7

BH8

BH9

BH10

BH14

BH15

BH4

56ft.

40ft.

25ft.

9ft.

22ft.

34ft.

A

A

59.00ft.

STBD AFT CORNER

PORT FWD CORNER

60ft.

20ft. 34ft.

65ft.

BH6

BH16

BH17

Page 8: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

-5 ft

0 ft

5 ft

10 ft

15 ft

20 ft

25 ft

30 ft

35 ft

40 ft

0 psf 50 psf 100 psf 150 psf 200 psf 250 psf 300 psf 350 psf 400 psf 450 psf 500 psf 550 psf

BH1, BH3 and Consensus Su, From Roson (T-bar Nkt=10.5) Relative to BH3 Mat Top Plate - PORT FWD CORNER.

Dep

th b

elo

w T

OP

PL

AT

E O

F M

AT

Soil Start Record BH10

Skirt Tip Elevation

BH1 T-bar Nkt = 10.5

BH3 T-bar Nkt = 10.5

Consensus

MAT and SKIRTS(Top Plate of Mat is Zero Depth Reference on this chart)

3.40 ftDifference Between BH10 Zero Elevation and BH3 Mat Top Plate = Elevation match made with Su spike at 38.4' below mat top plate.

Elevation match made with Su spike at 38.4' below mat top plate seen in BH3. No spike seen in BH4.

Page 9: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

Possible Mat Penetration Stages and Failure Zones with Borehole Locations Indicated and Displaced Soil Partly Derived from SI ResultsFE Solution is for Initial Two Feet of Penetration (Skirt tips penetrated four feet)

Final Estimate of Penetration at Port Fwd Corner of Mat = 6.4 feet (WPS)

32.0ft.

6.40ft.

3.60ft.

1.9ft.

10.00ft.

40ft below mat top plate

BH10

BH9 BH15 BH14BH8 BH7

BH2BH3

BH4

Initia

l pos

sible

Prand

tl She

ar P

lanes

Final p

ossib

le Pra

ndtl S

hear

Plan

es

Initial mat position

Final mat position

Soil Heave Levels Not Known in This Area

Soil area (volume) displaced as inferred from borehole records = 125 sqft.

6.4 feet penetration would displace 6.4 x 32/2 = 102 sqft on each side.

Page 10: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability

The factor of safety against overturning, or OTSF, is defined as:OTSF = (SRmoment – Wmoment)/OTmomentWhere:SRmoment = soil ultimate capacity resisting momentWmoment = (weight – buoyancy) momentOTmoment = overturning moment from environmental forcesIt must be noted that the above definition of the OTSF is more accurately a definition of first yield in typical normally consolidated soft clays, where the increasing strength with depth may result in increasing resistance following first yield as deeper penetration occurs.

Page 11: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability
Page 12: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability
Page 13: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability
Page 14: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability
Page 15: STEWART TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 1 Mat-Supported Jack-Up Foundation On Soft Clay – Overturning Storm Stability