18
1 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012 Status på LTE-A Standardisering og teknologi Præsenteret af Troels B. Sørensen Sektionen for Radio Access Teknologi (RATE), Aalborg Universitet IDA-TTS Konference, 4. december, 2012 2 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012 Matti Kiiski, 1 July 2011

Status på LTE-A€¦ · MIMO DL 2x2 8x8 with CA 2x2 with CA* 4x4 without CA 4x4 without CA MIMO UL No No 2x2 4x4 with CA Downlink 4x4 MIMO: 15bps/Hz Uplink 2x2, MIMO Cell edge (64QAM):

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Status på LTE-AStandardisering og teknologi

    Præsenteret af Troels B. SørensenSektionen for Radio Access Teknologi (RATE), Aalborg UniversitetIDA-TTS Konference, 4. december, 2012

    2 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012Matti Kiiski, 1 July 2011

  • 3 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Standardization

    ITU-R – International Telecommunication Union - Radiocommunication (sector)IMT-A – International Mobile Telecommunications - AdvancedE-UTRAN – Evolved UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access NetworkUMTS – Universal Mobile Telecommunications System3GPP – 3rd Generation Partnership ProgramLTE – Long Term EvolutioneNB – evolved Node BUE – User Equipment

    4 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Requirements

    • The 3GPP LTE evolution to meet/exceed the ITU-R IMT-Advanced capabilities of a 1Gbps (4G) system– Peak data rates of 100 Mbit/s for high and 1 Gbit/s for low mobility– Peak spectral efficiencies 15bps/Hz downlink (4×4 MIMO) and 7.5bps/Hz uplink

    (2×4 MIMO)– Bandwidth scalability up to 40MHz, and preferably to 100MHz– User plane latency 10ms and 100ms for control (idle to active)

    • 3GPP set its own requirements for LTE-Advanced as detailed in 3GPP TR 36.913, including– Increased spectral efficiencies (improved efficiency over LTE)

    Average targets increased 30% for downlink and 40% for uplink Peak extended to 8×8 MIMO downlink and 4×4 MIMO uplink

    – Meeting 3GPP operator requirements for the evolution of E-UTRASelf-Organizing Networks (SON)

    – Backwards compatibility requirementsA Release 8 E-UTRA terminal can work in an Advanced E-UTRAN, An Advanced E-UTRA terminal can work in an Release 8 E-UTRAN

  • 5 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Technology Components

    Carrier Aggregation

    MIMO

    Cooperative Systems

    Relaying

    8x 4x

    Backward compatible

    to LTE

    Mobility

    Heterogeneous Networks

    1st LTE field trialBerlin, 11/2007

    Smooth Migrationto LTE-A

    Key ingredients

    Carrier1 Carrier2 Carrier3 … Carrier5

    up to 100 MHz

    These fulfill the ITU requirements for 3-sector macro

    LTE standardization is not driven only by

    IMT-Advanced!

    6 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Standardization – 3GPP Releases

    2008 2009 2010 2011

    LTE-AStudy Items

    Rel. 10

    LTE-A

    LTE-AWork Items

    “The 18 months cycle” for releases -

    and market (terminal) introduction

    First LTE-A release …

    PAST

    2012 2013 2014 2015

    Rel. 11

    LTE-A

    ?Rel. 12… and the

    next almost here

    NOW

  • 7 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Standardisation - Specifications

    • The core of the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) specifications relates to the 36 series of the 3GPP specifications– http://www.3gpp.org/specification-numbering (overview of the 3GPP

    specification numbering)

    Specifications and responsible Radio

    Access Network (RAN) Working Group

    After “LTE for UMTS”, Wiley 2011

    LTE and LTE-A in Rel. 10 and beyond specifications

    RF: 36.101 - 36.104, 36.133 (RAN4)

    L2/L3: 36.321 – 36.323, 36.331, 36.304/306

    (RAN2)

    L1: 36.211 - 36.214(RAN1)

    X2: 36.421 - 36.424(RAN3)

    S1: 36.411 - 36.414(RAN3)

    Packet coreAir interface

    eNBS1

    X2

    UE

    8 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Technology ComponentsCA, MIMO, HetNet (eICIC), CoMP, Relays

  • 9 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Carrier Aggregation (CA)BW – BandwidthRRC – Radio Ressource Control (layer or signalling)PDCCH – Physical Downlink Control CHannelPUCCH – Physical Uplink Control CHannelCQI – Channel Quality IndicatorFDD – Frequency Division DuplexDL – DownlinkUL – UplinkCC – Component CarrierPCell/SCell – Primary and Secondary CellCRS – Common Reference SignalPSS/SSS – Primary and Secondary Synchronization SignalOFDM – Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing

    CCE – Common Control ElementBCCH – Broadcast Control CHannelRRC – Radio Ressource Control (signalling)CQI – Channel Quality IndicatorNACK/ACK – Negative AcknowledgeCSI – Channel State InformationPRB – Physical Resource Block

    10 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Carrier Aggregation (CA)

    • High peak data rates achieved even with fragmented spectrum (important practical aspect)

    • Backwards compatibility requirements with Release 8 LTE is achieved with carrier aggregation by combining up to N = 5 Release 8 component carriers to form N x LTE bandwidth, for example 5 x 20 MHz = 100 MHz

    • LTE terminals receive/transmit on one component carrier, whereas LTE-Advanced terminals may receive/transmit on multiple component carriers simultaneously

    Both contiguous and non-contiguous CA is supported offering improved spectrum flexibility (e.g. for

    refarming).

    Primary and Secondary Cells

    (Component Carriers - CC)

  • 11 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    CA Band Combinations

    • Initial focus is on CA for two band combinations, specific to different regions of the world– Radio frequency aspects are being handled per case and in a release independent

    manner

    • Current RF specification work has beenprioritized to focus on downlink CA– CA for uplink is more complicated and

    will be standardized based on the DL CA combinations

    SpuriousHarmonicsBroadband noise

    Band 20: 791 – 821 MHz (DL) | 832 – 862 MHz (UL) Band 7: 2500 – 2570 MHz (UL) | 2620 – 2690 MHz (DL)

    Band 3 + 7(FDD)

    Band 20 + 7(FDD)

    Band 3: 1710 – 1785 MHz (UL) | 1805 – 1880 MHz (DL) Band 7: 2500 – 2570 MHz (UL) | 2620 – 2690 MHz (DL)

    Need for (maximum) power reduction of

    4-6dB

    12 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    CA Gain Mechanisms

    • Multi-carrier scheduling allows for: – more bandwidth per user (peak data rate) and better use of high frequency bands

    (coverage)– load balancing/ressource sharing and frequency domain scheduling across carriers

    Segm.ARQ etc

    Multiplexing UE1

    Segm.ARQ etc...

    Scheduling / Priority Handling

    Logical Channels

    Transport Channels

    MAC

    RLC Segm.ARQ etcSegm.

    ARQ etc

    PDCPROHC ROHC ROHC ROHC

    Radio Bearers

    Security Security Security Security

    ...

    HARQ HARQ...

    Multiplexing UEn

    HARQ HARQ...

    CC1 CCx... CC1 CCy...

    Independent HARQ per CC. Thus, HARQ retransmissions

    shall be send on the same CC as the corresponding original

    transmission

    There is one PDCP and RLC per Radio Bearer. Not visible from

    RLC on how many CCs the PHY layer transmission is conducted.

    Separate transport channel per CC

    Dynamic Layer-2 packet scheduling accross multiple CCs

    supported

  • 13 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    CA Signalling

    • Each CC provides reference (CRS) and synchronisation signals (PSS/SSS), as well as system broadcast information (BCCH) specific to that carrier– only PCell however carries radio ressource control (RRC) signalling - for bearer setup, CA

    configuration, mobility measurements, handover, …– individual SCells can be activated

    /deactived with MAC controlelement to save terminal power – within 7ms

    • Added capacity in control channels for multi-carrier to support more CQI requests, ACK/NACK and CSI reporting, power headroom signalling .. and somesimplifications to reduce terminal complexity at the same time– reduced need for DPCCH decoding on SCells (e.g. CCE blind decoding on PCell only),

    control signalling in uplink PCell PUCCH only– Cross-carrier scheduling capability of special importance to heterogeneous network

    operation

    TTI with 2 slots of 0.5 ms (14 OFDM symbols)

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    Time

    PRB

    OFDM SymbolPDCCH

    14 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO)SISO – Single Input Single Output (antenna system) MU-MIMO – Multi-User MIMOSU-MIMO – SIngle User MIMOPMI – Precoding Matrix IndicatorDM-RS – Demodulation Reference SignalCSI-RS – Channel State Information – Reference SignalURS – UE specific Reference SignalOCC – Orthogonal Cover CodesSRS – Sounding Reference SignalCM – Cubic MetricSC – Single CarrierCQI – Channel Quality Indicator

    Precoding – ”Antennevægtning af TX-antenner”

  • 15 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    MIMO

    • The targeted data rates of LTE-A can only be achieved by using advanced Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antenna techniques

    • Primarily an evolution of LTE MIMO ...– Transmit Diversity/Beamforming (Open/Closed Loop)– Spatial Multiplexing (Open Loop)– Precoded Spatial Multiplexing (Closed Loop)

    • .. except for – Increased MIMO constellations– Uplink Single-User MIMO (SU-MIMO)– Flexible Multi-User Scheduling in both downlink and uplink

    SISO2x2 MIMO4x4 MIMO8x8 MIMO

    SISO2x2 MIMO4x4 MIMO

    Downlink Uplink

    Tx

    1

    2

    NT

    1

    2

    NR

    Rx

    feedback

    DiversitygainCoherent

    gainMultiplexing

    gain

    16 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Downlink MIMO

    eNB

    CQI, PMI

    MIMO UE4

    UE3

    MIMO UE2

    MIMO UE1

    Data Stream 1

    Data Stream 2

    Data Stream 1

    Data Stream 2

    Data

    MU-MIMOTransmit Diversity

    /Beamforming

    SU-MIMO

    CQI, PMI, RIDynamic

    switching based onoptimised feedback

    CQI, PMI, RI ”Double codebook”for 8 TX antennas

    ”New” UE specific reference signal (URS) for demodulation:

    Includes precoding information for flexibleMU-MIMO operation

    (pairing per ressource)

    New reference signals ”replacing”Common Reference Signal (CRS):

    Sparse CSI-RS for feedback generation reduces overhead

  • 17 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Uplink MIMO

    eNB

    UE3

    UE2

    UE1

    Data Stream 1

    Data Stream 2

    DataVirtual (MU)-MIMO Transmit diversity

    MIMO UE4Data Stream 1

    Data Stream 2

    SU-MIMOWideband (Closed

    Loop) Precoding whichis Cubic Metric (CM)

    preserving

    Aperiodic and dynamic SRS reference signal transmisson:

    Enhances the use of SRS ressources

    New Orthogonal Cover Code (OCC) on top of demodulation reference signal (DM-RS):Allows separation of partially overlapping

    transmissions for flexible MU-MIMO operation

    18 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Reference signals (DL)

    OFDM symbols

    Sub

    carri

    ers

    ”The Devil is in the details!”

    Sparse CSI-RS, sent only when in fact needed (overlapped with data transmissions) to reduce overhead

    for large MIMO constellationsSupport for 2, 4 and 8 TX antennas

    URS (DM-RS) sent withprecoding, hence no need to signal precoder separately

    Allows decoupling in spatial and frequency

    domain scheduling

    In uplink, the same scheduling flexibility is introduced using OCC

  • 19 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Performance

    QAM – Quadrature Amplitude ModulationUL/DL – Uplink and Downlink

    20 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    UE Categories• In addition to the existing 5 categories in rel. 8 (LTE), three new

    terminal categories added in rel. 10 specifications

    • Peak data rates can be achieved in different combinations from CA and MIMO capabilities

    Class 4 --- Class 6 Class 7 Class 8150/50 Mbps 300/50 Mbps 300/100 Mbps 3000/1500 MbpsPeak rate DL/UL

    64QAMModulation DL 64QAM 64QAM 64QAM

    16QAMModulation UL 64QAM 16QAM 16QAM

    2x2MIMO DL 8x8 with CA2x2 with CA*4x4 without CA2x2 with CA*

    4x4 without CANoMIMO UL 4x4 with CANo 2x2

    Downlink 4x4 MIMO: 15bps/Hz

    Uplink 2x2, MIMO (64QAM): 7.5bps/HzCell edge

    efficiency is about 1% of

    peak!

    * Carrier aggregation of two 20MHz carriers

  • 21 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Cell Performance• From simulations, average LTE-A cell spectral efficiencies exceed ITU

    requirements

    • Much of the gain can be achieved already with LTE rel. 8 (e.g. Multi-User MIMO), but additional MIMO capability and flexibility in scheduling gives additional gain for LTE-A rel. 10

    – Downlink: UE specific reference signals (URS, or DM-RS), dynamic switching SU/MU-MIMO and optimised double codebook feedback for 8 TX antennas

    – Uplink: SU-MIMO operation, orthogonal cover codes on DM-RS, dynamic aperiodic SRS transmission

    2.6bps/Hz

    2x2 MIMO

    3.4bps/Hz

    4x2 MIMO

    4.7bps/Hz

    4x4 MIMO1.4

    bps/Hz1x2 MIMO

    2.3bps/Hz

    2x4 MIMO

    DownlinkUplink

    “LTE-Advanced; 3GPP Solution for IMT-Advanced", John Wiley, 2012

    22 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    LTE-A Capability

    LTE 50MHz FDD6GB/sub/month

    LTE-A 50MHz FDD10GB/sub/month

    LTE-A 50MHz FDDHetNet

    54GB/sub/month

    Heterogeneous Networks with small and large cells are essential to cell-edge improvements! – secondarily CoMP

    LTE-A 50MHz FDDNetwork upgrade15GB/sub/month

    LTE-A 100MHz FDDHetNet

    107GB/sub/month

    ?

    “LTE-Advanced; 3GPP Solution for IMT-Advanced", John Wiley, 2012

  • 23 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Heterogeneous Networks (HetNet)

    ABS – Almost Blank SubframeHeNB – Home eNBCSG = Closed Subscriber GroupEIRP = Equivalent Isotropic Radiated PowerHeNB = Home base stationRE = Range ExtensioneICIC = Enhanced ICICHII = High Interference IndicationICIC = Inter-Cell Interference CoordinationOI = Overload IndicationRNTP = Relative Narrow band Transmit PowerSON = Self Optimizing Network

    24 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    The Combined Benefit of Wide & Local Area

    Macro

    Micro

    Pico, Femto

    Share will grow in future• 10 – 100 m, • < 500 mW

    Share of sites growing• 100 – 300 m • 1 – 5 W

    Majority of cell sites today• > 300 m • > 5 W output power

    License exempt growing & Secondary services emerging• 10-100 m• < 100 mW AccessPoints

    Wide Area sites

    Medium area sites

    Local area

    Local area

    Local area

    Local area

    WLAN

    WLANWLAN

    Medium area sites

    Local area

    WLAN

    WLAN

    Benefits of Multi-Layer Deployment• Coverage improvement from local area cells

    in edge or shadowed regions• Capacity increase from more transmission

    points in a given area

    Tradeoffs involved with Multi-Layer• Co-channel deployment needs no additional

    spectrum but creates interference between the layers and within the same layer >> this interference needs to be controlled for QoS

  • 25 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    HetNet Co-Channel Interference

    Pico eNB:Tx power: 30 dBmAntenna gain: 5 dBiEIRP: 35 dBm

    Macro eNB:Tx power: 46 dBmAntenna gain: 14 dBiEIRP: 60 dBm

    Macro eNB

    CSG HeNB:Tx power: 20 dBmAntenna gain: 0 dBiEIRP: 20 dBm

    Dominancearea of HeNB

    Coverage area of pico without RE

    Extendedcoverage area of

    pico with RE

    Coverage area of macro

    26 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    LTE Multi-Cell Coordination via X2Cell ACell B

    µ-cell B

    µ-cell A1

    No X2 betweenmacro and

    HeNBs(rel.10 includes

    X2 betweenHeNBs for some

    cases)• Each 3GPP releases has added few new features:

    – Release 8Mobility Management (Handover)ICIC (RNTP, HII, OI)SON Management

    – Release 9SON enhancementsLoad balancingEnergy Saving

    – Release 10TDM eICIC

  • 27 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    TDM eICIC PrincipleAlmost blanksub-frame (ABS)Sub-frame withnormal transmission

    Macro-layer

    Pico-layer

    HeNB-layer

    Pico-nodes can schedule UEs withlarger RE, if not interfered from non-

    allowed CSG HeNB(s)

    Macro-eNBs and Pico-eNBs can schedulealso users that are close to non-allowed CSG

    HeNB(s), but not pico-UEs with larger RE.

    Pico-UEswith

    largerRE,

    close to CSG

    HeNB(s) are

    schedulable (as well as

    pico-UEswithout

    RE).

    28 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    HetNet is ”hot”

    Considered Small Cell Scenarios & ObjectivesOngoing LTE Rel-12 Study Item3GPP TR 36.932

    Ongoing LTE Rel-12 Study Item3GPP TR 36.932

    Cases with dedicated carrier deployment

    Cases with dedicated carrier deployment

    Macro-assisted and standalone small cell

    solutions

    Macro-assisted and standalone small cell

    solutions

    Enhanced mobility for dense small cell

    deployments

    Enhanced mobility for dense small cell

    deployments

    Efficient small cell SON

    Efficient small cell SON

    Study of PHY and Architecture

    enhancements

    Study of PHY and Architecture

    enhancements

    Exploiting new carrier type (NCT)

    Exploiting new carrier type (NCT)

    Spectrum:e.g. 3.5 GHz for small cells

    Spectrum:e.g. 3.5 GHz for small cells

    Energy efficient solution

    Energy efficient solution

    Rel. 12 WI on HetNetMobility improvements

    for LTE (rel. 11 SI)

    Rel. 12 WI on NCT

    Rel. 12 WI on CarrierBased HetNet ICIC for

    LTE (rel. 11 WI)

    Rel. 12 SI onSmall Cell

    Enhancements

  • 29 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Coordinated Multipoint (CoMP) Transmission and Reception

    JP – Joint Processing

    30 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Cell A

    CoMP Principle

    Cell A (Anchor Cell for the CoMP Cooperative Set)

    Cell BCell C

    • A 3-cell CoMP Cooperative/Transmission Set in downlink

    Inter-cell CoMP signaling

  • 31 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    CoMP Techniques

    • Categories of CoMP

    – Joint Processing (JP):Data is available at each cell in CoMP cooperating set (CSI and scheduling info, AND data shared among cooperating cells)

    Joint Transmission: Transmission from multiple points (part of or entire CoMPcooperating set) at a time Dynamic cell selection: Transmission from one point at a time (within CoMPcooperating set)• A single point is the transmission point at every subframe; this transmission point can change

    dynamically within the CoMP cooperating set

    – Coordinated Scheduling/Beamforming (CS/CB):Data is only available at serving cell and transmitted from that point (CSI and scheduling info shared among cooperating cells)

    The user scheduling/beamforming decisions are made with coordination among cells corresponding to the CoMP cooperating set

    Alike ICIC but faster and including spatial

    domain

    32 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Relays

  • 33 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Relays

    • Relay nodes with LTE backhaul – inband or outband– for coverage extension/cell edge performance improvement– backwards compatible with rel. 8

    Macro eNodeB

    Relay Nodes

    Micro BTS

    Backhaul linkRelay looks like an additional sector of

    the macro

    Access linkRelay looks like an eNB

    seen from the UE

    Full eNB functionality

    34 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Summary

  • 35 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Summary• Bandwidth has been extended in rel. 10 (LTE-A) up to 100MHz by using backwards

    compatible carrier aggregation– Two carrier downlink CA combinations have been specified and more will come,

    including uplink CA combinations • Support for Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antennas has been extended in

    rel. 10– Uplink SU-MIMO up to 4 × 4 for increasing uplink peak spectral efficiency (up to

    15bps/Hz) and enhance average cell spectral efficiency– Support of up to 8x8 MIMO in downlink to increase peak spectral efficiency (up to

    30bps/Hz) and average cell spectral efficiency– “The Devil is in the details” of the reference signals, which has allowed

    improvements especially to Multi-User MIMO• Multi-layer interference management for Heterogeneous Networks using time-

    domain enhanced ICIC (eICIC)• CoMP techniques are still under investigation but included in rel. 11 for downlink and

    improved for uplink over what is already possible with LTE rel. 8• Transparent relay nodes with wireless LTE backhaul were introduced in rel. 10,

    primarily for cell edge improvements• With these techniques, the target of reaching a peak data rates of more than 1Gbit/s

    and significant improved average cell spectral efficiency in both UL and DL are achieved

    36 © Aalborg University/RATE IDA-TTS konference/ Troels B. Sørensen / 4. december 2012

    Literature

    “LTE-Advanced; 3GPP Solution for IMT-Advanced", John Wiley, 1stedition, September 2012, Edited by Harri Holma and Antti Toskala

    “LTE for UMTS; Evolution to LTE-Advanced", John Wiley, 2ndedition, March 2011, Edited by Harri Holma and Antti Toskala

    “4G: LTE/LTE-Advanced for Mobile Broadband”, Academic Press, 2011, Edited by Erik Dahlman, Stefan Parkvall and Johan Skjold

    “LTE-advanced and 4G wireless communications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 50, no. 2, February 2012