13
Status of the CSC Track-Finder Status of the CSC Track-Finder Darin Acosta University of Florida

Status of the CSC Track-Finder Darin Acosta University of Florida

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Status of the CSC Track-FinderStatus of the CSC Track-Finder

Darin Acosta

University of Florida

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

2

CSC Muon Trigger SchemeCSC Muon Trigger Scheme

CSC

CFEBCFEBCFEB CFEB

ALCT1 of 24

CFEB

1 of 2

LVDB

1 of 5

1 of 5

Anode Front-end Board

Cathode Front-end Board

Anode LCT Board

MPC

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

DMB

TMB

CCBC

ONTROLLER

Peripheral Crate on iron disk (1 of 48)

Trigger Timing & Control

CSC Track-Finder Crate (1)

Trigger Motherboard (9)

DAQ Motherboard (9)Clock Control Board

Optical link

In underground counting room

On detector

Muon Portcard (1)

EMU part: mostly in productionTriDAS part: Second generation prototypes

Trigger Primitives

3-D Track-Finding and Measurement

Sector Processor (12)

Muon Sorter (1)

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

3

11stst Prototype Track-Finder Tests (2000) Prototype Track-Finder Tests (2000)

Sector ProcessorSector Processor(Florida)(Florida)

Sector ReceiverSector Receiver(UCLA)(UCLA)

Clock Control Clock Control Board (Rice)Board (Rice)

Bit3 Bit3 VME VME InterfaceInterface

Custom Custom ChannelLinkChannelLinkBackplaneBackplane(Florida)(Florida)

Muon Port CardMuon Port Card(Rice)(Rice)

Very Very successful, successful, but overall but overall

CSC latency CSC latency was too high --was too high --

New 2002 New 2002 design design

improves improves latencylatency

Results included in Trigger L1 TDR

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

4

CSC Track-Finder CrateCSC Track-Finder Crate

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

SR /

SP

CC

B

SB

S 6

20 C

ontr

olle

r

Sector Processor

Clock and Control Board

Muon Sorter

From MPC (chamber 4)

From MPC (chamber 3)

From MPC (chamber 2)

From MPC (chamber 1B)

From MPC (chamber 1A)

To DAQ

MS

Single Track-Finder Crate Design with 1.6 Gbit/s optical links

Second generation prototypes

4 merged boards

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

5

Combined SR/SP 2002 PrototypeCombined SR/SP 2002 Prototype

Problems encountered attempting layout using in-house tools

Sent to industry for completion of layout using Cadence Allegro

Final board takes 16 layers

Cost of manufacture, assembly, and parts is about $20K / board

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

6

SP2002 Main Board (SR Logic)SP2002 Main Board (SR Logic)

3 SRs

Optical Transceivers

•15 x 1.6 Gbit/s Links

Front FPGA

TLK2501 Transceiver

Phi Local LUT

Eta Global LUT

Phi Global LUT

EEPROM

VME/CCB

FPGA

DC-DC Converter

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

7

SP Trigger LogicSP Trigger Logic

From SP2000 to SP2002 mezzanine card

Xilinx Virtex-2 XC2V4000~800 user I/O

(Mezzanine card also used for CSC sorter)

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

8

Tests underway…Tests underway…

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

9

Optical Link Test ResultsOptical Link Test ResultsUsing pseudo-random test built into TLK2501 chipset

SP02 optical loopback test over 1 m optical cable No errors!

SP02 optical loopback test over 100 m cable BER = 1012

MPCSP02 optical test over 100 m cable BER = 3×1013

Controlled MPCSP02 chain test Download 255 bx of data for one MPC (3 muons × 32 bits),

preceding each iteration with a L1 Reset Send data over three 100 m cables into SP, and readout

Counting the 0’s transmitted between iterations, 30 link errors observed in total from 3 links over 16 hours (3×1014 bits) BER = 1013

Thus, about 1 error / hour, likely from clock jitter

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

10

Optical Link Tests (Cont’d)Optical Link Tests (Cont’d)Controlled MPCSP02 chain test without L1 Reset

This is how we would like to operate Explicitly check data sent vs. data received Tests underway, code still needs improvements (e.g. to issue

L1 Reset if link fails and does not recover)

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

11

ScheduleScheduleProposed schedule as of Feb-2003:

Feb.’03: SP02 prototype completed, initial tests begin Mar.’03: MPCSP optical link tests Apr.’03: SP memory and trigger logic tests May.’03: CSC system tests with cosmic rays and

beam tests at CERN

June ’03… : Tests with Muon Sorter and DT Track-Finder

√ (April)

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

12

Test Beam PlansTest Beam PlansPlan to test CSC Trigger all the way to the Track-Finder in May/June beam tests Complete chain test from 2 detectors to peripheral crate

electronics to Track-Finder crate electronics!

Structured beam period: 23 May 1 June Two DAQ systems will run concurrently: CSC DAQ and

Track-Finder DAQ Track-Finder will just log inputs, not generate a track trigger Goal is to validate trigger primitives are found efficiently on

correct bx and successfully received over optical links Record as much data as possible under various detector

configurations for future track identification studies

Asynchronous beam period: 13 June 1 July Possibility to test a unified DAQ using “slice test” software

developed in XDAQ

CMS Week, 25 Feb 2003

D.Acosta, University of Florida

13

ConclusionsConclusionsSecond generation CSC Track-Finder prototype completed

Optical link tests between Port Card and Sector Receiver successful Measurable (but small ~10-13) bit error rate seen

Plan to take T-F to beam test later this monthTests of SR memories and SP trigger logic to followInterface tests with CSC Sorter and DT T-F also planned