Status of PEP-X Lattice Design Study

ARD Status Meeting

April 7, 2011

Yuri Nosochkov

Beam Physics Department

On behalf of BPD Optics Group

page 2

Motivation

SLAC-PUB-13999, April 2010

2.2 km PEP-IItunnel

page 3

Evolution of PEP-X lattice design

Studied lattice configurationsx0, nm-rad at 4.5 GeV, without / with damping wiggler, no IBS

Year

Minimal PEP-2 HER modification:• 6 existing FODO arcs with higher 90 cell phase• 4 existing FODO arcs and 2 new DBA arcs

5.0 / 0.41 1.7 / 0.32

2008

Pre-baseline: 4 TME arcs and 2 DBA arcs 0.30 / 0.067 2008 - 2009

Baseline: 4 TME arcs and 2 DBA supercell arcs with low ID beta

0.38 / 0.086 2009 - 2010White Paper

Ultimate: 6 arcs with Multi-Bend Achromat (MBA) cells for lowest emittance

0.029 / ~0.01-0.015 2010 - 2011under study

page 4

Baseline design report

Baseline design report SLAC-PUB-13999 (2010)

+ 10 conference papers

• Lattice• Transverse dynamics• IBS & Touschek lifetime• RF system• Impedance• Collective effects• Partial lasing

page 5

Baseline ring configuration

• The same 2.2 km ring geometry as in PEP-II with six 243 m arcs and six 123 m straights in order to fit into the existing tunnel .

• Two new DBA arcs providing 30 straights for ~3.5 m IDs.

• Four new TME arcs for low emittance.

• 90 m damping wiggler with B=1.5T, p=10cm to lower emittance to 86 pm-rad.

• FODO optics in long straights.

• PEP-II based injection system.

• 4.5 GeV beam energy.

page 6

Schematic of photon beamlines in PEP-X

page 7

Baseline arc cells: DBA and TME

• DBA supercell = two standard DBA cells with a low- and high- ID straights: x,y = 3.00, 6.07 m and 16.04, 6.27 m.

• Supercell length = 30.42 m.• 30 dispersion free straights in 2

arcs for Insertion Devices.• Natural emittance = 0.54 nm at

4.5 GeV.

high IDlow ID

DBAsupercell

TME

• Compact 7.3 m TME cells in 4 arcs for low emittance.

• Do not provide ID straights.• Low natural emittance = 0.1 nm.

Combined DBA & TME arcs emittance = 0.38 nm.

page 8

Baseline parameters with wiggler on and off

Parameter Wiggler on Wiggler off

Energy, E0 [GeV] 4.5

Circumference, C [m] 2199.32

Emittance, x [pm-rad, 0 current] 86 380

Beam current, I [A] 1.5

Harmonic number, h 3492

Number of bunches, nb 3154

Bunch length, z [mm] 3.0

Energy spread, 1.14 x 10-3 0.55 x 10-3

Momentum compaction, p 5.81 x 10-5 5.81 x 10-5

Tunes, x/y/s 87.23 / 36.14 / 0.0077 87.23 / 36.14 / 0.0037

Damping times, x/y/s [ms] 20.3 / 21.2 / 10.8 101 / 127 / 73

Energy loss, U0 [MeV/turn] 3.12 0.52

RF voltage, VRF [MV] 8.9 2.0

x/y at ID center, [m] (low/high ) [ 3.00 / 6.07 ], [ 16.04 / 6.27 ]With IBS at 1.5 A: = 164 / 8 pm-rad; Touschek lifetime ~30 min.

page 9

PEP-X baseline brightness

PEP-X, 1.5A, 3.5m ID

page 10

PEP-X in ERL options

Loop SC Linac

Injection

PEP-X Ring

Extraction

Bypass

PEP-X baseline ring design is also compatible with the two studied ERL configurations, where:

1.ERL SC linac is in the SLAC linac tunnel, and the PEP-II injection line and tunnel are reused.2.SC linac is inside of the PEP-X ring for potential cost saving.

Simulations of bunches with E=5 GeV, z=2 ps, Q=77 pC, =0.3 m-rad indicate acceptable (~10%) emittance growth in both options.

page 11

Toward “ultimate” design

There is a growing interest in the so-called “ultimate” ring design for a synchrotron light source. It aims at achieving a near maximum brightness by reducing the electron emittance in both planes toward and beyond the diffraction limited photon emittance.

“… To approach diffraction-limited performance: (1) the electron beam emittance, xyx'y' must be comparable to or less than the intrinsic photon beam emittance, /4

and (2) the phase space of the electron and photon beam sizes must be matched (i.e., r/r' ≈ x/x' ≈ y/y'). For hard X-ray radiation at = 0.1 nm, /4 = 8 pm-rad while for soft X-rays at = 1 nm the diffraction limit is 80 pm-rad ...”

“The potential of an ultimate storage ring for future light sources.” M. Bei et al., Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A622:518-535,2010.

where F() = photon flux,

Photon emittance:

,, yx ,'' yxElectron & photon size and divergence:

Matched for ID length L: e-

Matchede- = r

for max B

xx'

(small)

page 12

Scaling for low emittance

2

32

ds

dsH

J

C

x

q

For N = number of cells in the ring arcs, L = cell length and NL = const:

22 '2' xxxH where

,/1 3NH 0N )()(32

3

2

cellFJ

cellFNJ x

B

x

Need: 1) short cells, 2) low emittance type optics, 3) dipoles with negative gradient for larger Jx.

Consequences:

Smaller , and beam size:

Larger ring chromaticity:

Stronger quads and sextupoles:

Smaller dynamic aperture

,1 NlK

,/1 N ,/1 2N

32 NlK

N

)/1(/1 235.2 lKorNA

2

13

2

1

ds

dsK

J x

2/1 N

(affects injection)

page 13

Multi-bend achromat cell

The new cell should provide both the dispersion free ID straights (DBA type) and the low emittance (TME type). This is achieved using multi-bend achromat cell as in MAX-IV below. The latter contains five TME style units in the middle and half-DBA units at each end. For shorter cell, the QD quads in the TME units are removed and replaced by negative gradient in the dipoles.

MAX-IV

5 × TME ½DBA½DBA

TME

DBA

½ID ½ID

page 14

PEP-X 7-bend achromat cell

Cell length = 30.4 m, TME unit = 3.1 m, ID straight = 5 m, ID x,y = 4.9 m / 0.8 m,5 bends with gradient: LB = 2 m, BB = 1.49 kG, B = 19.9 mrad, B' = -0.654 kG/cm,2 matching bends w/o gradient: LBM = 1.6 m, BBM = 1.48 kG, BM = 15.7 mrad,Quad triplets near ID allow more tuning flexibility, Max quad gradient = 4.3 kG/cm,Natural emittance = 29 pm-rad at 4.5 GeV. Each arc contains 8 cells.

5 TME units

page 15

Sextupoles in the 7BA cell

TME unit

½ID½ID

SF SDHarmonic sext (or octupoles)

Matching unit

MAX-IV dipole+ 2 sextupoles in one block

• SF and SD sextupoles at dipole and quad locations where dispersion is not zero.• Harmonic sextupoles (or octupoles) at the ID triplets – study in progress.• Presently modeled as thin lenses: SF inside quads, SD at dipole ends.• Max B''L ≈160 kG/cm -- under study.• Realistic design should be based on compact integrated magnet designs – for example, as in MAX-IV where dipole + 2 SD sextupoles are made of one iron block. Similar design is planned for quad + sextupole.

page 16

Simplified PEP-X ring with 7BA cells

2.2 km ring with 6 identical arcs and 6 identical long straight sections.Each 243.2 m arc contains eight 7BA cells for up to 9 ID straights per arc. Injection optics and damping wiggler are to be included later.

page 17

Lattice parameters without wiggler

Energy, GeV 4.5Circumference, m 2199.3167Betatron tune, x/y 114.23 / 66.14Synchrotron tune 0.00405Beam current, A 0.2Number of bunches 3154Natural emittance at 0 A, pm 29 (no IBS)

Emittance at 0.2 A, x/y, pm 47 / 8 (IBS)

RMS bunch length, mm 3.1RMS momentum spread 7.2e-4Momentum compaction 5.0e-5Damping time, x/y/s, ms 75 / 184 / 326Natural chromaticity, x/y -162.9 / -131.2Energy loss per turn, MeV 0.36RF voltage, MV 2.7Max ID straights per arc 9Length of ID straight, m 5.0Beta at ID center, x/y, m 4.9 / 0.8

page 18

Cell phase advance

Phase advance per cell x = 21/8 × 2, y = 11/8 × 2 is chosen based on optimal cell optics properties and maximum dynamic aperture. Each arc (8 cells) has an integer tune advance which provides local cancellation of the sextupole 2nd order geometric and chromatic aberrations in each arc, per K. Brown’s theorem.

Local cancellation of 2nd order dispersion in each arc

page 19

Cancellation of 3rd and 4th order resonances

LEGO tracking confirms local suppression of the 3rd and most of the 4th order resonance terms in each arc due to the chosen cell phase advance. Due to thin lens sextupole model, the effects of finite sextupole length are not yet included.

3rd order driving terms 4th order driving terms

page 20

Remaining resonance and tune shift effects

2x-2y resonance term is accumulating, and the amplitude dependent tune shifts are quite large. This will affect dynamic aperture. Further optimization may include: 1) sextupoles, 2) minor tuning of cell phase for better 2x-2y suppression.

2x-2y dx/dx -5.0∙105

dx/dy -3.0∙104

dy/dy 3.8∙105

From MAD:

(5 times larger than in baseline)

page 21

Tune energy dependence

Chromatic and harmonic sextupole families have been optimized for minimal tune dependence on energy for larger tune working area.

page 22

Dynamic aperture

The simplified ring has reasonably large dynamic aperture – about 170x × 400y for 47 / 8 pm-rad emittance. This is helped by the 6-fold periodicity, resonance suppression and thin lens sextupole model. Horizontal aperture corresponds to ~15 mm at injection with x = 200 m which is sufficient. The injection optics and wiggler will break the periodicity which may reduce the aperture (to be studied).

At ID:x = 4.9 my = 0.8 m

page 23

IBS and Touschek lifetime

coupling 0 (pm) IBS (pm) E (10-4) z (mm) T (min)

0.17 24.7 / 8.0 46.8 / 8.0 8.4 3.47 58

1 14.5 / 14.5 27.1 / 27.1 8.0 3.30 109

K. Bane

• At I = 0.2 A, the IBS results in ~90% higher horizontal emittance.

• Momentum aperture defined by Touschek scattering is from 1.2% (in arcs) to 2.5% (in straights).

• Touschek lifetime is ~1 and ~2 hours for diffraction limited and round beam modes.

• To maintain stable beam intensity, top-up injection may be used.

page 24

Cell tuning flexibility

x (m)

y (m) y (m)

x (pm)

The cell includes sufficient number of quadrupole families to provide tuning flexibility. The vertical ID beta function can be varied in the range of ~0.5 m to 5 m without changing the cell phase advance. The horizontal ID beta function and emittance are not significantly changed in this range.

page 25

0 0.5 1 1.5 20.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

B field of damping wiggler (Tesla)

Ene

rgy

spre

ad (

Ew

/E

0)

0 0.5 1 1.5 20

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

B field of damping wiggler (Tesla)

Em

itta

nce

rati

o of

dam

ping

(/

0)

MBA 7 cells 0 = 28.965 pmrad

<x>= 12.4 m

w

= 20 cm, Np = 446

w

= 15 cm, Np = 595

w

= 10 cm, Np = 892

w

= 5 cm, Np = 1785

w

= 3 cm, Np = 2976

w

= 1.4 cm, Np = 6378

0 50 100 1500

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

Total damping wiggler length (m)

Em

itta

nce

rati

o of

dam

ping

(/

0)

Bw

= 1.5 T

w = 20 cm

w

= 15 cm

w

= 10 cm

w

= 5 cm

w

= 3 cm

w

= 1.4 cm

Damping wiggler

/0 vs Lw at 1.5T

/0 vs B at Lw=89m E/E0 vs B

• Preliminary estimate shows a reduction of 29 pm emittance to:- 15.7 pm for Lw=89m, B=1.0T, p=10cm- 10 pm for Lw=89m, B=1.5T, p=5cm• The wiggler also significantly reduces the damping times to 20-30 msec.• A higher wiggler field increases energy spread and requires smaller wiggler gap which reduces vertical acceptance and increases resistive wall impedance.

page 26

Injection straight section

Injection optics will be included in one of the 6 long straight sections. It will have large x = 200 m for large acceptance area at septum. This lattice is similar to the PEP-X baseline and should be able to reuse the PEP-II injection components.

page 27

Summary

* The PEP-X baseline ring design was completed and documented in SLAC-PUB-13999. Its emittance is 164 / 8 pm at 1.5 A, and the predicted brightness is ~10 times higher than in the NSLS-II. The design is based on existing technology – ready for implementation.

* The baseline design is also compatible with the recently studied ERL options at SLAC producing satisfactory beam quality.

* “Ultimate” PEP-X lattice for extremely low emittance approaching diffraction limited photon emittance is currently under study.

* Simplified 6-fold periodic ring with 29 pm-rad natural emittance (47 / 8 pm at 0.2 A) is designed providing up to nine 5m ID straights per arc.

* Dynamic aperture for this ring is sufficiently large due to periodicity, compensated sextupole resonance effects and thin lens sextupole approximation.

* Further work will include the injection and wiggler insertions (almost done), more sextupole optimization for maximum aperture, tolerance and correction studies.