Upload
micah-bradley
View
225
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Statistical Physics Statistical Physics Approach to Approach to
Understanding the Understanding the Multiscale Dynamics of Multiscale Dynamics of
Earthquake Fault SystemsEarthquake Fault SystemsTheory
Statistical Statistical Physics Physics
Approach to Approach to Understanding Understanding the Multiscale the Multiscale Dynamics of Dynamics of Earthquake Earthquake
Fault SystemsFault Systems
Huge range of scale
Phenomenology of dynamics
Systems composed of large number of simple, interacting elements
Uninterested in small-scale (random) behaviour
Use methods of statistics (averages!)
Overview
• Motivation
• Scaling laws
• Fractals
• Correlation length
• Phase transitions– boiling & bubbles– fractures & microcracks
• Metastability, spinodal line
Limitations to Observational Approach• Lack of data (shear stress, normal stress, fault geometry)
• Range of scales:
Fault length: ~300km Fault slip ~ m Fault width ~ cm
Scaling Laws
log(y) = log(c) - b log(x) b>0 y = c x-b
Why are scaling laws interesting?
Consider interval (x0, x1)minimum of y is y1 = c (x1)-b
maximum of y is y2 = c (x0)-b
ratio y2/y1 = (x0/x1)-b
now consider interval ( x0, x1)minimum of y is y1 = c ( x1)-b
maximum of y is y2 = c ( x0)-b
ratio y2/y1 = (x0/x1)-b
compare with: y = ex/b, b>0
on (x0, x1), y1 = ex0/b, y2 = ex1/b
y2/y1 = e(x1-x0)/b
on ( x0, x1), y1 = e x0/b, y2 = e x1/b
y2/y1 = e (x1-x0)/b
x0 x1
λ x0 λ x1
→ ratio independent of scale λ!
→ power-law relation ≈ scale-free process
Earthquake scaling lawsGutenberg-Richter Law• Log Ngr(>m) = -b m + a
– m = magnitude, measured on logarithmic scale
– Ngr(>m) = number of earthquakes of magnitude greater than m occurring in specified interval of time & area
– Valid locally & globally, even over small time intervals (e.g. 1 year)
Omori law:dNas/dt = 1/t0 (1+t/t1)-p
Nas = number of aftershocks with m>specified value
t = time after main shock
Benioff strain:
N = number of EQs up to time t
ei = energy release of ith EQ
i.e. intermediate EQ activity increases before big EQ
FractalsFractal = self-similar = scale-free
e.g. Mandelbrot set
Fractals are ubiquitous in nature (topography, clouds, plants, …)
Why?
c.f. self-organized criticality, multifractals, etc.
Correlation Length
Correlations measure structure
On average, how different is f(x) for two points a distance L apart?
Correlation length ~ largest structure size
Correlation length → ∞ ~ all scales present = scale-free
L
L
L
Lc
Let correlation length = scale where correlation is maximal
Phase transition model…
Let’s look at earthquakes as phase transitions!
solid/liquid/gas
involves latent heat
1st order phase transition
supercritical fluid
NO latent heat involved
2nd order phase transition
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Phase diagram of a pure substance:
coexistence of liquid and vapor phases!
Isothermal decrease in pressure
Liquid boils at constant P
Reduction in P, leads to isothermal expansion
Formation of metastable, superheated liquid
Spinodal curve: limit of stability. No superheating beyond!!! Explosive nucleation and
boiling (instability) at constant P,T
Vapor equilibrium curve
s’more about stability… why a spinodal line?
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Ideal Gas Law Van der Waals equation (of state)
(real gas)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
volume
pre
ss
ure
isotherms
volume
pre
ss
ure isotherms
correction term for intermolecular force, attraction between particles
correction for the real volume of the gas molecules, volume enclosed within a mole of particles
Incompressible fluid (liquid): at small V and low P: isotherms show large increase in P for small decrease in V
compressible fluid (gas): at large V and low P: isotherms show small decrease in P for large decrease in V
Metastable region: 2-phase coexistence at intermediate V and low P with horizontal isotherms
Consequence of…
The spinodal line is interesting!
It acts like a line of critical points for nucleating bubbles
Limit of stability!Limit of stability!
Now let’s look at brittle fracture of a solid as a phase change…
Let’s look at a plot of Stress vs.
Strain…
Deforms elastically until failure at
B
Undergoes phase change at B
Elastic solid rapidly loaded with
constant stress ( < yield stress)
Damage occurs at constant stress or
pressure
Elastic solid strained rapidly with a
constant strain ( < yield strain)
Damage occurs along constant strain path until stress is reduced to
yield stress (IH)… similar to constant volume boiling (DH)
When damage occurs along a constant strain path…
We call it stress relaxation!
Applicable to understanding the aftershock sequence that follows an earthquake
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
earthquake
Rapid stress!
Rapid stress!
Rapid stress!
Rapid stress!
If rapid stress is greater than yield stress: microcracks form, relaxing
stress to yield stress
Time delay of aftershock relative to main shock = time delay of damage
Why?
Because it takes time to nucleate microcracks
when damage occurs in form of microcracks.
Damage is accelerated strain, leading to a
deviation from linear elasticity.
How do we quantify derivation from linear elasticity?
a damage variable!!
as failure occurs
as increases : brittle solid weakens
due to nucleation and coalescence of
Microcracks.
nucleation
coalescence
phase change
Meta
stab
le r
eg
ion
Incr
ea
sin
g c
orr
ela
tion
len
gth
Spinodal LineSpinodal Line
Metastability – an analogy
Consider a ball rolling around a ‘potential well’
Gravity forces the ball to move downhill
If there is friction, the ball will eventually stop in one of the depressions (A, B, C)
What happens if we now perturb the balls?
(~ thermal fluctuations)
B is globally stable, but A & C are only metastable
If we now gradually make A & C shallower, the chance of a ball staying there becomes smaller
Eventually, the stable points A & C disappear – this is the limit of stability, the spinodal
C
B
A
Tomorrow, we will consider a potential that changes in time
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.the end