Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Statistical Perspectives 2018
Sustainable Energyin Asia and the Pacific
A statistical overview of energy and development
Statistical Perspectives 2018
Sustainable Energy in Asia and the PacificA statistical overview of energy and development
Much of the content contained within this booklet is drawn from the Asia Pacific Energy Portal, an open access data and policy information resource. See more at: www.asiapacificenergy.org
This publication is for reference only. Graphs and charts are based on data sources consulted for this publication. Additional data sources may exist that are not represented. In some cases, data sets may not be complete. ESCAP cannot confirm methodologies of third-party data sources.
Data is not available for all countries for all indicators. Due to data limitations, only selected countries are used in several of the statistical representations. Due to the numerous sources used, latest data available varies.
Data presented in map formats are provided as illustrative charts. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontier or boundaries.
Due to space limitations, data sources for all charts are presented at the end of the publication.
▼ AcknowledgementsStatistical Perspectives 2018: Sustainable Energy in Asia and the Pacific is not an official publication of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). The publication’s contents were developed by Kim Roseberry and Kira Lamont, with support from Margarita Cherkasova and Gennady Fedorov. The Energy Division of ESCAP provided overall guidance to the authors, although the accuracy of the content is the sole responsibility of the authors and ESCAP takes no responsibility in this regard. Design and layout was provided by Lowil Espada.
ii
ESCAP MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
The shaded areas of the map indicate ESCAP members and associate members. Information and statistics presented in this publication include only those member and associate member States located in the Asia-Pacific region.
1. China2. Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea3. Hong Kong, China*4. Japan5. Macao, China*6. Republic of Korea7. Mongolia
1. Armenia2. Azerbaijan3. Georgia4. Kazakhstan5. Kyrgyzstan6. Russian Federation7. Tajikistan8. Turkmenistan9. Uzbekistan
1. Brunei Darussalam2. Cambodia3. Indonesia4. Lao People’s
Democratic Republic5. Malaysia6. Myanmar7. Philippines8. Singapore9. Thailand10. Timor-Leste11. Viet Nam
1. Afghanistan2. Bangladesh3. Bhutan4. India5. Islamic Republic of Iran6. Maldives7. Nepal8. Pakistan9. Sri Lanka10. Turkey
1. American Samoa*2. Australia3. Cook Islands*4. Federated States of
Micronesia5. Fiji6. French Polynesia*7. Guam*8. Kiribati9. Marshall Islands10. Nauru11. New Caledonia*12. New Zealand13. Niue*14. Northern Mariana
Islands*15. Palau16. Papua New Guinea17. Samoa18. Solomon Islands19. Tonga20. Tuvalu21. Vanuatu
East & North-East Asia North & Central Asia South-East Asia South & South-WestAsia The Pacific
* Indicates an ESCAP associate member.
iii
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT
East & North-East Asia
Pacific
South-East Asia
North & Central Asia
South & South-West Asia
▼ Urbanization Rates, 2016
% of
popu
latio
n
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Hong
Kong
, Chin
aSin
gapo
reGu
amMa
cao,
China
Japa
nCo
ok Is
land
sAu
stra
liaNo
rther
n Mar
iana
s Isla
nds
Naur
uPa
lau
Amer
ican S
amoa
New
Zeal
and
Repu
blic
of Ko
rea
Brun
ei Da
russ
alam
Mala
ysia
Islam
ic Re
publ
ic of
Iran
Marsh
all Is
land
sRu
ssia
n Fed
erat
ion
Turk
eyMo
ngol
iaNe
w Ca
ledon
iaAr
men
iaDP
R Ko
rea
Geor
giaCh
inaFre
nch P
olyn
esia
Azer
baija
nTu
valu Fij
iIn
done
siaTh
aila
ndKa
zakh
stan
Turk
men
istan
Philip
pine
sLa
o PDR
Kirib
ati
Mald
ives
Bhut
anPa
kista
nMy
anm
arBa
ngla
desh
Kyrg
yzst
anUz
bekis
tan
Viet
Nam Niue
Indi
aTim
or-L
este
Tajik
istan
Vanu
atu
Afgh
anist
anTo
nga
Solo
mon
Isla
nds
Micr
ones
ia (
F.S.)
Cam
bodi
aSr
i Lan
kaSa
moa
Nepa
lPa
pua N
ew Gu
inea
Population Size in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2017
Millio
ns
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Urbanization Rate in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2017
% of
popu
latio
n
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT
› The Asia-Pacific population has grown to reach nearly 4.5 billion, while urbanization in most of the region is increasing. These factors contribute to the region’s rising energy demand.
1
Index value
0.47 0.54 0.62 0.70 0.78 0.86 0.94
What is the Human Development Index?
The Human Development Index, produced by the United Nations Development Programme, offers a broad measure of human development. The composite index “integrates three basic dimensions of human development. Life expectancy at birth reflects the ability to lead a long and healthy life. Mean years of schooling and expected years
of schooling reflect the ability to acquire knowledge. And gross national income per capita reflects the ability to achieve a decent standard of living.”
The HDI alone cannot measure the level of a country’s development as other factors are contributors to the broad concept of “human development.” However, the
HDI offers a strong tool for assessing broad development results and can be utilized along with other measures such as the Gender Inquality Index and the Multidimensional Poverty Index.
Source: Humand Development Report Office.
For more information on the Human Development Index, please visit: http://hdr.undp.org/.
Human Development Index, 2015
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT
› Energy underpins development and outcomes. Human development – as measured by life expectancy, education levels and income – remains highly varied across economies.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT
2
Total Primary Energy Supply in Asia and the Pacific, by Resource, 1990-2015
Millio
n ton
s of o
il equ
ivalen
t
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
East & North-East Asia
Pacific
South-East Asia
North & Central Asia
South & South-West Asia
Coal
Oil
Natural gas
Nuclear
Hydro
Renewables (excluding Hydro)
Total Primary Energy Supply in Asia and the Pacific, by Subregion, 1990-2015
Millio
n ton
s of o
il equ
ivalen
t
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
ENERGY SUPPLY and USE
ENERGY SUPPLY and USE3
Total Primary Energy Supply, GDP and Energy Intensity in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2014
1990
= 10
0
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Total primary energy
GDP 2011 PPP $
Primary energy intensity
ENERGY SUPPLY and USE
› The regional growth trend for Asia and the Pacific has largely been driven by the coal supply in East and North-East Asia.
The region has also experienced a rise in prosperity. This has been accelerated by a decoupling of energy use and GDP over time as more economic value has been created with less energy.
4
Final Energy Consumption in Asia and the Pacific, by Sector 1990-2015
1990
= 10
0
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
400
200
019
90
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Final Energy Consumption in Asia and the Pacific, by Product, 2015
Industry
Residential
Transport
Oil32.0%
Coal20.8%
Other0.7%
Heat4.6%
Biofuels and waste10.1%
Electricity19.1%
Natural gas12.6%
4,465Mtoe equivalent
ENERGY SUPPLY and USE
› Growth, particularly in industrial and transport sectors, has driven increasing energy consumption.
5
Per Capita GDP and Per Capita Final Energy Consumption, 20154000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Kg of
oil e
quiva
lent
2005
US do
llars
per c
apita
45000
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
Aust
ralia
Maca
o,Ch
inaJa
pan
Singa
pore
Hong
Kong
, Chin
aNe
w Ca
ledon
iaNe
w Ze
alan
dBr
unei
Daru
ssal
amRe
publ
ic of
Kore
aFre
nch P
olyn
esia
Cook
Isla
nds
Turk
eyNa
uru
Pala
uMa
lays
iaTu
rkm
enist
anRu
ssia
n Fed
erat
ion
Kaza
khst
anMa
ldive
s Fiji
China
Thai
land
Islam
ic Re
p. of
Iran
Azer
baija
nMa
rshal
l Isla
nds
Geor
giaTo
nga
Arm
enia
Sam
oaTu
valu
Sri L
anka
Micr
ones
ia (
F.S).
Mong
olia
Bhut
anIn
done
siaVa
nuat
uTim
or-L
este
Philip
pine
sPa
pua N
ew Gu
inea
Indi
aSo
lom
on Is
land
sKi
ribat
iVi
et N
amUz
bekis
tan
Pakis
tan
Lao P
DRCa
mbo
dia
Kyrg
yzst
anBa
ngla
desh
Myan
mar
DPR K
orea
Tajik
istan
Nepa
l
Kg of oil equivalent per capita
173 718 1.3k 1.8k 2.4k 2.9k 3.4k
Per Capita Final Energy Consumption in Asia and the Pacific, 2015
ENERGY SUPPLY and USE
› Fossil fuel exporters and economies with higher per capita GDP levels demonstrate higher levels of per capita energy consumption.
6
▼ 1990 ▼ 2018
Coal
Gas
Oil/Diesel
Nuclear
Hydro
Wind
Solar
Geothermal
Biomass
Marine
Power Plants in Asia and the Pacific
ENERGY SUPPLY and USE
› The number of power
plants across the region has increased significantly,
bringing power to growing population and industrial centres. Diversification of the power supply is apparent in
recent years, particularly with the expanding use
of solar and wind.
7
Electricity Production by Product in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2015 TW
h
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Coal
Oil
Natural Gas
Nuclear
Hydro
Solar/Wind/Tide
Geothermal
Biofuels and Waste
▼ Solar/Wind/Tide % of Electricity Production in Asia and the Pacific,1990-2015
% of
tota
l pro
duct
ion
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
ENERGY SUPPLY and USE
› The Asia-Pacific region’s electricity is largely derived from coal, which represents over half of the power mix. The contribution of renewables other than hydro is growing exponentially, but remains small.
8
Rural and Urban Electrification Rates, 2014Vanuatu Viet Nam
Papua New Guinea Tajikistan
Kiribati Kyrgyzstan
Solomon Islands Cook Islands
Timor-Leste Armenia
Myanmar Australia
Cambodia Azerbaijan
Mongolia Brunei Darussalam
Bangladesh China
Lao PDR French Polynesia
India Georgia
Micronesia (F.S.) Hong Kong, China
Fiji Japan
Marshall Islands Kazakhstan
Nepal Macao, China
Philippines Malaysia
Afghanistan Maldives
Sri Lanka New Caledonia
Tonga New Zealand
Indonesia Republic of Korea
Islamic Rep. of Iran Russian Federation
Pakistan Singapore
Bhutan Thailand
Tuvalu Turkey
Samoa Turkmenistan
Palau Uzbekistan
% of population 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Rural
Urban
India, 269.8
Indonesia, 7.6
DPR Korea, 16.9
Other Asia-Pacific countries, 2.9Afghanistan, 3.3
Bangladesh, 59.8Cambodia, 6.7
Papua New Guinea, 6.0Philippines, 10.8Sri Lanka, 1.6
Myanmar, 25.6Nepal, 4.3
Pakistan, 4.6
Lao PDR, 1.5
People Without Access to Electricity in Asia and the Pacific, 2014(Millions)
ENERGY ACCESS
421 million people
› The majority of the region’s population without access to electricity is located in economies with large, and often growing, rural populations.
› Current data shows 100% electrification rates in many economies. However, existing statistical methodologies fail to capture aspects such as quantity, reliability and affordability. Improved methodologies behind forthcoming data are likely to reveal access gaps in these areas.
ENERGY ACCESS
9
Rural and Urban Number of People with Access to Electricity in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2014
Millio
ns
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Rural population with access
Rural population
Urban population with access
Urban population
› Approximately 9.7% of the Asia-Pacific population lacks access to electricity. Most live in rural areas where the size of the access gap is many times the gap of the region’s urban population.
ENERGY ACCESS
10
▼ Clean Fuels and Technologies Usage Rate, 2014Kiribati
Timor-Leste Lao PDR
DPR KoreaSolomon Islands
MyanmarBangladesh
CambodiaVanuatu
AfghanistanSri Lanka
Micronesia (F.S.)Nepal
SamoaTuvalu
Papua New Guinea Mongolia
IndiaFiji
Marshall Islands Pakistan
PhilippinesViet Nam
GeorgiaIndonesia
ChinaPalauTonga
BhutanTajikistanThailand
KyrgyzstanCook Islands
UzbekistanKazakhstan
NauruAzerbaijan
MaldivesIslamic Rep. of Iran
ArmeniaRussian Federation
Republic of KoreaMalaysia
TurkmenistanAustralia
Brunei DarussalamJapan
New ZealandSingapore
% of total population 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Other Asia-Pacific countries, 15.6
India, 852.8
Afghanistan, 26.2
China, 583.8
Bangladesh, 143.0
Indonesia, 110.3
Papua New Guinea, 5.1
Philippines, 54.7
Sri Lanka, 16.8 Cambodia, 13.3
Myanmar, 48.6Viet Nam, 44.6
Nepal, 20.8
Pakistan, 102.1
Lao PDR, 1.5
DPR Korea, 23.4
Thailand, 16.4
People Without Access to Clean Cooking Fuels and Technologies in Asia and the Pacific, 2014(Millions) › Nearly 2.1 billion
people in Asia and the Pacific continue to rely on traditional cooking fuels and technology. Those in rural areas are far more likely to depend on traditional cooking fuels such as wood, dung, and charcoal.
2,084million people
ENERGY ACCESS
11
Primary Cooking Fuel Mix in Selected Asia-Pacific Economies ▼ Urban ▼ Rural
Turkmenistan Malaysia
Russian Federation Russian Federation
Uzbekistan Armenia
Armenia Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan Uzbekistan
Malaysia Kazakhstan
Bhutan Tajikistan
Kazakhstan Thailand
Tajikistan Tonga
Tonga Bhutan
Marshall Islands Philippines
Kyrgyzstan Indonesia
Thailand Viet Nam
Indonesia Georgia
Pakistan Sri Lanka
Viet Nam China
Philippines India
India Nepal
China Pakistan
Sri Lanka Marshall Islands
Afghanistan Vanuatu
Nepal Cambodia
Vanuatu Afghanistan
Solomon Islands Solomon Islands
Mongolia Mongolia
Bangladesh Bangladesh
Myanmar Myanmar
Lao PDR Lao PDR
% of population 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Clean
fuels
Electricity
LPG
Natural Gas
Biogas
Kerosene
Coal
Charcoal
Wood
Dung
Crop waste
Others
ENERGY ACCESS
Note: In cases where data does not sum to 100%, the remaining gap represents households data classified as “non-cooking,” “missing,” or “other.”
ENERGY ACCESS
12
Total final consumption per capita (kg of oil equivalent per capita)
1-700
700-1400
1401-2100
2100-2800
2801-3500
Energy intensity (MJ per 2011 PPP $)1-700
700-1400
1401-2100
2100-2800
2801-3500
GDP per capita (2005 USD per capita)
1 - 875
875 - 2090
2090 - 3541
3541 - 8683
8683 - 52177
GDP Per Capita, Total Final Consumption Per Capita and Energy Intensity, 2014
ENERGY ACCESS
› Richer economies show lower energy intensity levels in relation to per capita consumption levels, while poorer economies tend to demonstrate the opposite trend.
13
Number of Asia-Pacific Economies with Active Energy Efficiency Targets and Regional Energy Intensity
8
7.5
7
6.5
56
5.5
MJ pe
r 201
1 PPP
$
Num
ber o
f eco
nom
ies
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
▼ Energy Intensity, 2014Macao, China
Hong Kong, China, Sri LankaLao PDR
Afghanistan Singapore
Timor-LestePhilippines
TongaFiji
BangladeshMyanmar
TurkeyTuvalu
IndonesiaAzerbaijan
MaldivesJapan
SamoaVanuatu Pakistan
KiribatiIndia
MalaysiaAustralia
Brunei DarussalamSolomon Islands
ArmeniaTajikistanThailand
New ZealandCambodia
GeorgiaViet Nam
Asia and the PacificRepublic of Korea
MongoliaMicronesia (F.S.)
ChinaMarshall Islands
KazakhstanNepal
Islamic Rep. of IranPapua New Guinea
Russian FederationKyrgyzstan
BhutanUzbekistan
PalauTurkmenistan
MJ per 2011 PPP $ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
› Energy efficiency has gained priority, as indicated by the introduction of national targets. Concurrently, energy intensity has steadily declined at the regional level.
14
Overview of Decomposition Analysis
A decomposition analysis, which examines changes in total final energy consumption since 1990 based on three underlying effects of activity, efficiency, and structure, indicates that the regional decline in energy intensity is primarily supported by the effects of growing populations and economic output (activity effect), and, to a lesser degree, energy efficiency (efficiency effect). It also indicates that shifts in the mix of economic activity across sectors (structural effect) did not have a notable impact at the aggregated regional level.
Decomposition analysis is used to quantify relative contributions of predefined factors to the change in energy consumption. Several methods of decomposition analysis exist, which support the assessment of energy policy and technology effectiveness. The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition of energy consumption method is used in this example.
Source: World Bank Global Tracking Framework
Decomposition Analysis of Energy Use in Asia and the Pacific
1990
= 10
0
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Activity Effect
Structure Effect
Efficiency Effect
Total Final Energy Consumption
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
› Increased economic activity and energy efficiency have been the drivers of falling energy intensity, while structural changes have had little impact at the regional level.
15
Electricity Losses as a Percentage of Output, 2014
% of
popu
latio
n
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Nepa
l
Cam
bodi
a
Myan
mar
Kyrg
yzst
an
Indi
a
Pakis
tan
DPR K
orea
Turk
ey
Tajik
istan
Mong
olia
Islam
ic Re
p. o
f Ira
n
Hong
Kong
, Chin
a
Azer
baija
n
Bang
lade
sh
Turk
men
istan
Arm
enia
Kaza
khst
an
Philip
pine
s
Russ
ian
Fede
ratio
n
Sri L
anka
Indo
nesia
Brun
ei Da
russ
alam
Viet
Nam
Uzbe
kista
n
World
Aver
age
Geor
gia
New
Zeal
and
Thai
land
Aust
ralia
China
Japa
n
Mala
ysia
Repu
blic
of K
orea
Singa
pore
Energy Intensity by Region, 2014
6.00 5.97 5.80
4.583.91
4.90
MJ pe
r 201
1 PPP
$
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0 Asia and thePacific
Africa North America Europe Latin America andCaribbean
Western Asia
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
› Energy intensity remains high in Asia and the Pacific. Significant gains in energy efficiency have been realized in some sectors, particularly the industrial sector, while others lag, such as the power sector.
16
Percentage
0 15.1 30.1 45.2 60.2 75.3 90.3
2014 Modern Renewable Energy Share of Total Final Energy Consumption and Annualized Change, 2012-2014
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
Annu
alise
d cha
nge (
%)
% sh
are o
f TFE
C
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Tajik
istan
New
Zeal
and
Niue
Geor
giaLa
o PDR
Bhut
anMa
cao,
China
Frenc
h Pol
ynes
iaVi
et N
amDP
R Kor
eaAf
ghan
istan
Turk
eyCh
inaPh
ilippi
nes Fiji
Arm
enia
Nepa
lAu
stra
liaSr
i Lan
kaPa
pua N
ew Gu
inea
New
Caled
onia
Cam
bodi
aJa
pan
Thai
land
Myan
mar
Pakis
tan
Uzbe
kista
nMa
lays
iaRu
ssia
n Fed
erat
ion
Sam
oaIn
dia
Vanu
atu
Indo
nesia
Kaza
khst
anRe
publ
ic of
Kore
aHo
ng Ko
ng, C
hina
Azer
baija
nAm
erica
n Sam
oaIsl
amic
Rep.
of Ir
anTo
nga
Singa
pore
Mong
olia
Micr
ones
ia (F
.S.)
Marsh
all Is
land
sBa
ngla
desh
40.7
Renewable Share of Total Final Energy Consumption, 2014
RENEWABLE ENERGY
RENEWABLE ENERGY
› Renewable energy comprises a large share of final energy consumption for many economies. However, when traditional biomass is excluded, “modern renewable energy” remains. Outside of hydro-rich and some island economies, modern renewable energy shares generally remain low.
17
Top Five Asia-Pacific Economies for Installed Capacity, 2000-2016 ▼ Solar ▼ Wind
GW
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Modern Renewable Energy Consumption in Asia and the Pacific, by Resource, 1990-2014
Exaj
oules
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
› Hydropower dominates renewable energy growth in Asia and the Pacific. However, new capacity additions – particularly solar and wind – in some economies are shifting the regional renewable energy mix.
China
Japan
India
Australia
Republic of Korea
Turkey
Other Asia-Pacific countries
Hydropower
Modern solid biofuels
Solar
Wind
Geothermal
Liquid biofuels
Other RE
RENEWABLE ENERGY
18
China India Russian Federation Japan Viet Nam
1,294,210GWh
198,383GWh
177,884GWh
150,406GWh
58,690GWh
Turkey Australia New Zealand Pakistan Indonesia
52,628GWh
37,043GWh
34,458GWh
31.825GWh
26,138GWh
Renewable Power Mix for Top Ten Asia-Pacific Economies for Total Renewable Electricity Generation, 2014
Hydro
Solid biofuels
Solar PV & thermal
Wind
Geothermal
Waste
Biogas
Liquid biofuels
RENEWABLE ENERGY
19
Installed Renewable Capacity and Investment in Asia and the Pacific, 2007-2016
250
200
150
100
50
US$ B
illion
GW
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Small Distributed Capacity Investment, 2016
8.5
3.5
1.2
US$ B
illion
9.0
1.0 0.9 0.6
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0 Japan China Australia Republic of Korea
India Pakistan
Installed Capacity
Investment
RENEWABLE ENERGY
› Installed renewable energy capacity continues to rise while the falling costs of technologies, particularly solar, have contributed to the recent decline in investment numbers. Distributed capacity is increasingly important in some national contexts where small installations, such as on rooftops, have been supported through national policy.
20
Solar power plants by capacity (MW)1 - 285285 - 571571 - 857
857 - 1142
1142 - 1428
1428 - 1714
1714 - 2000
Photovoltaic power potential (KWh/KWp)1
2
3
4
5
6
› The Asia-Pacific region benefits from high solar potential in many areas, subject to seasonal shifts. Due to its versatility as a power source, solar is a viable energy resource for diversifying national power supplies, as well as bringing electricity to households in remote locations. With increasing technology affordability, solar capacity is growing at an exponential rate within the region.
Note: Purple dots indicate the location of solar power plants, scaled by capacity. The highest solar potential is identified in shades of red descending to blue within the basemap.
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Solar Potential and Solar Power Plant Locations, 2018
21
Wind power plants by capacity (MW)1 - 25050 - 250250 - 500
500 - 1000
1000 - 5000
5000 - 10000
Mean annual wind speed at 80m (m/s)0
2.25
4.5
6.75
9
› Wind potential is widespread, offering opportunities to increase renewable energy power production across the region. Onshore installations have grown rapidly in recent years while offshore installations are limited to a few locations.
Note: The yellow dots indicate the location of wind power plants, scaled by capacity The highest wind potential is identified in shades of dark blue descending to light yellow within the basemap.
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Wind Potential and Wind Power Plant Locations, 2018
RENEWABLE ENERGY
22
Renewable Energy Jobs by Sector, 2016Mi
llions
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0 Asia and the Pacific* Rest of World
› Asia and the Pacific dominates global renewable energy capacity, production, consumption, and jobs. In this region, solar jobs comprise more than half of all renewable energy jobs.
Solar (PV, Heating/Cooling, CSP)
Hydropower (Large and Small)
Biogas
Geothermal
Wind
Liquid Biofuels
Solid Biomass
Others* Asia and the Pacific is comprised of summed data for Australia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia,
Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Singapore, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkey, Uzbekistan, and Viet Nam.
RENEWABLE ENERGY
23
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Estimated Jobs in Renewable Energy, 2016
China
India
Rest of the world
Japan Bangladesh
Russian Federation
Malaysia
PhilippinesPakistan
Viet Nam Thailand
Turkey
Indonesia Iran
Note: Numbers include direct and indirect jobs, including those in the large hydropower sector
9,823,700global renewable energy jobs
Jobs, thousands
China 3955.5
India 856.6
Japan 330.4
Indonesia 206.0
Bangladesh 162.3
Turkey 127.6
Russian Federation
115.7
Viet Nam 103.5
Thailand 100.0
Malaysia 99.2
Philippines 80.2
Pakistan 73.9
Jobs, thousands
Islamic Rep. of Iran
39.7
Australia 22.6
Republic of Korea
17.1
Myanmar 13.1
Nepal 11.0
Tajikistan 9.7
Cambodia 5.2
Singapore 4.0
Azerbaijan 3.7
New Zealand 3.6
Uzbekistan 3.6
Kazakhstan 2.5
24
Coal power plants by capacity (MW)50.0 - 500.0500.0 - 1000.01000.0 - 2500.02500.00 - 5000.0
5000+
Mean annual ambient PM 2.5 (µg/m3)
0 171 182 193 204 255 306 357 408 459 5010 5511 6012 6513 7014 7515 8016
PM 2.5 Annual Mean Levels (2014) and Coal Power Plant Locations
› Coal power, a significant source of PM2.5, has contributed, alongside other factors, to poor air quality in many urban and industrial centers.
Considerations:The health impacts associated with PM2.5 range from poor visibility in cities, to pulmonary diseases,premature deaths, as well as increased medical and other costs to the state and the larger population.
PM2.5 is not a perfect measure of anthropogenic air quality degradation, as air borne dust and sand particulates from the natural landscape can greatly affect the concentration of PM2.5 seen in some areas.
Although annual averages capture the larger trend in PM2.5 concentrations, it doesn’t allow interested parties to examine the influence of wind patterns on final data, or the impact of transboundary pollution.
PM2.5 concentrations are likely to be more concentrated in large cities with larger populations and affected substantially by the modal split of that city or country, along with the primary fuel source of choice, as well as vehicle and gas emission standards within that country
Note: The yellow colour descending to a deep red indicates dangerous concentrations of particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less, as measured and averaged over the course of 2014. Purple dots indicate the location of coal power plants, and are scaled to reflect plant capacity.
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
25
▼ PM2.5 Mean Annual Exposure, 2015
µg/m
3
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Kirib
ati
Amer
ican
Sam
oa
Sam
oa
Tong
a
Brun
ei Da
russ
alam
New
Zeal
and
Aust
ralia
Solo
mon
Isla
nds
Guam Fij
i
Micr
ones
ia (F
.S.)
Vanu
atu
Marsh
all Is
land
s
North
ern
Maria
na Is
land
s
Japa
n
Papu
a Ne
w Gu
inea
Indo
nesia
Mala
ysia
Russ
ian
Fede
ratio
n
Kyrg
yzst
an
Singa
pore
Timor
-Les
te
Kaza
khst
an
Geor
gia
Philip
pine
s
Mong
olia
Arm
enia
Thai
land
Sri L
anka
Viet
Nam
Repu
blic
of K
orea
Cam
bodi
a
Mald
ives
Azer
baija
n
Turk
men
istan
Lao
PDR
DPR
Kore
a
Turk
ey
Uzbe
kista
n
Islam
ic Re
p. o
f Ira
n
Afgh
anist
an
Tajik
istan
Myan
mar
Bhut
an
China
Pakis
tan
Indi
a
Nepa
l
Bang
lade
sh
AIR QUALITY TARGETS
PM2.5 (µg/m3)
HEALTH IMPLICATIONS
WHO Guideline 10 These are the lowest levels at which total, cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality have been shown to increase with more than 95% confidence in response to long-term exposure to PM2.5
WHO InterimTarget 3
15 In addition to other health benefits, these levels reduce the mortality risk by approximately 6% [2-11%] relative to the IT-2 level.
WHO InterimTarget 2
25 In addition to other health benefits, these levels lower the risk of premature mortality by approximately 6% [2–11%] relative to the IT-1 level.
WHO InterimTarget 1
35 These levels are associated with about a 15% higher long-term mortality risk relative to the AQG level.
Exceeds all targets
>35
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
› Poor air quality is a significant factor experienced within the Asia-Pacific region, where the vast majority of the population is exposed to pollutant levels well above WHO guidelines.
26
CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, by Region, 1990-2015
Millio
n ton
s
20,000
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Asia and the Pacific
North America
Europe
Other countries
Latin America and Caribbean
Africa
Waste1%
Coal62%
Natural gas15%
Oil22%
17,623Million tons
CO2 Emissions in Asia and the Pacific by Fuel Source, 2015
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
› Asia and the Pacific, the world’s leading source of regional CO
2 emissions, largely determines global
progress in combating climate change.
27
▼ Per Capita CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion,
in Selected Economies, 2015Nepal
BangladeshMyanmarTajikistan
Cambodia Pakistan
DPR KoreaSri Lanka
PhilippinesIndia
ArmeniaKyrgyzstan IndonesiaViet Nam
GeorgiaUzbekistan Azerbaijan
ThailandTurkey
Mongolia Hong Kong, China
ChinaNew Zealand
Islamic Rep. of IranMalaysia
SingaporeJapan
Russian FederationTurkmenistan
KazakhstanBrunei Darussalam
AustraliaCook Islands
Metric tonnes 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Metric tonnes of CO2 per capita
0 3.3 6.5 9.7 13.0 16.2 19.4
Per Capita C02 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, 2015
2000
2015
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
› Per capita CO2
emissions are highly varied across Asia-Pacific economies, with some demonstrating falling rates, while others are increasing.
28
CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, by Sector, 2014
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
Armenia Australia Azerbaijan
China Georgia Hong Kong, China India
Kazakhstan Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Republic of Korea Kyrgyzstan
Nepal New Zealand Pakistan Philippines
Tajikistan Thailand Turkey Turkmenistan
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
29
Other2%
Transport13%
Electricity, heat52%
Manufacturing, industries, construction
26%
17,552Million tons of CO
2
Residential buildings,
commercial and public services
7%
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion in Asia and the Pacific, by Sector, 2014
› Approximately half of the region’s CO
2 emissions are emitted from
the electricity and heat sectors, and a quarter from manufacturing, industries and construction.
Bangladesh Brunei Darussalam Cambodia
Indonesia Islamic Republic of Iran Japan
Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar
Russian Federation Singapore Sri Lanka
Uzbekistan Viet NamTransport
Industries
Residential
Electricity, Heat
Others
30
Fossil Fuel Subsidisation in Selected Asia-Pacific Economies, 2016
928
435
247
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Aver
age s
ubsid
isatio
n rat
e (%
)
Subs
idy p
er ca
pita
($/p
erso
n)
1000
217196
147130
6027 17 10 8 6 6 3
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Turk
men
istan
Islam
ic Re
p. o
f Ira
n
Kaza
khst
an
Brun
ei Da
russ
alam
Russ
ian
Fede
ratio
n
Uzbe
kista
n
Azer
baija
n
Indo
nesia
China
Mala
ysia
Indi
a
Pakis
tan
Thai
land
Bang
lade
sh
Sri L
anka
Repu
blic
of K
orea
Viet
Nam
3 1
Subsidy per capita ($/person)
Average subsidisation rate (%)
Real 2016 $million % of GDPChina 36,783 0.3%
Islamic Republic of Iran 34,803 9.2%Russian Federation 28,220 2.2%
Indonesia 15,550 1.7%India 13,352 0.6%
Turkmenistan 5,048 14.0%Uzbekistan 4,652 7.0%
Kazakhstan 4,389 3.3%Pakistan 1,497 0.5%
Azerbaijan 1,269 3.4%Bangladesh 1,018 0.4%
Malaysia 511 0.2%Thailand 437 0.1%
Republic of Korea 150 0.0%Viet Nam 101 0.1%
Brunei Darussalam 92 0.8%Sri Lanka 64 0.1%
Note: The IEA measures fossil fuel consumption subsidies using a price-gap approach. This compares final end-user prices with reference prices, which correspond to the full cost of supply, or, where appropriate, the international market price, adjusted for the costs of transportation and distribution. The estimates cover subsidies to fossil fuels consumed by endusers.
For more detail on fossil fuel consumption subsidies see the ‘documentation’ section on the World Energy Outlook website: http://www.iea.org/weo/.
ENERGY AND ECONOMICS
ENERGY AND ECONOMICS
31
Average Pump Prices, 2016Turkmenistan
Brunei Darussalam Islamic Rep. of Iran
KazakhstanMalaysiaMyanmar
KyrgyzstanAzerbaijanDPR Korea
Russian FederationIndonesia
AfghanistanThailand
TajikistanMongolia
GeorgiaArmeniaPakistan
Viet NamFiji
PhilippinesSri Lanka
Cambodia Samoa
NepalLao PDR
AustraliaChinaIndia
BhutanUzbekistan
JapanTimor-LesteBangladesh
Republic of KoreaSingapore
VanuatuNew Zealand
TurkeyHong Kong, China
$ per litre 0 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50Gasoline
Diesel
US$ per litre
0.22 0.53 0.83 1.14 1.45 1.75 2.06
ENERGY AND ECONOMICS
ENERGY AND ECONOMICS
Average Gasoline Pump Prices in Asia and the Pacific, 2016
› Inefficient fossil fuel subsidies hinder clean energy development and climate action. Recent policy reforms have helped move many Asia-Pacific economies further toward market-based pricing, though progress has been slow in some sectors.
32
▼ Residential ($/MWh)Pakistan $125
Nepal $104
Indonesia $102
Armenia $94
China $83
Viet Nam $79
India $77
Bangladesh $76
Sri Lanka $65
Mongolia $51
Uzbekistan $44
Azerbaijan $44
Kazakhstan $41
Myanmar $29
Tajikistan $20
Kyrgyzstan $10
▼ Commercial ($/MWh)Pakistan $148
Sri Lanka $147
Bangladesh $123
India $116
China $115
Viet Nam $111
Nepal $107
Indonesia $102
Myanmar $73
Mongolia $60
Tajikistan $58
Azerbaijan $56
Uzbekistan $45
Kyrgyzstan $30
Average Electricity Prices, 2016(selected economies)
ENERGY AND ECONOMICS
33
▼ Industrial ($/MWh)Pakistan $138
India $100
Bangladesh $100
Indonesia $84
Sri Lanka $84
China $83
Nepal $80
Armenia $79
Mongolia $73
Myanmar $73
Viet Nam $69
Tajikistan $58
Azerbaijan $56
Uzbekistan $44
Kyrgyzstan $30
▼ Retail ($/MWh)Pakistan $133
Bangladesh $100
China $99
India $98
Nepal $97
Indonesia $96
Armenia $86
Sri Lanka $86
Viet Nam $74
Mongolia $62
Myanmar $58
Azerbaijan $52
Tajikistan $45
Uzbekistan $45
Kazakhstan $41
Kyrgyzstan $21
› Energy affordability is a pressing issue faced by consumers in many Asia- Pacific countries. High electricity prices can encumber economic and social development, while low prices may encourage wasteful consumption.
ENERGY AND ECONOMICS
34
▼ 2000
Coal and Coal Products China
Japan
Republic of Korea
Singapore
Turkey
Other Asia-Pacific countries
Africa
Europe
North AmericaLatin America and CaribbeanOther countries/areas
Crude Oil
Oil and Oil Product
Gas
Electricity
Coal and Coal Products
Kazakhstan
Singapore
TurkeyOther Asia-Pacific countriesAfrica
Europe
North America
Latin America and Caribbean
Other countries/areas
Crude Oil
Oil and Oil Product
Gas
Electricity
6.1% of total exports
valued at $35.8 billion
31.4% of total exports
valued at $171 billion
ENERGY TRADE
› The region’s
largest energy exporter has increasingly turned toward Asia-Pacific
economies.
▼ 2015
Export Trends for Asia-Pacific’s Largest Energy Exporter: The Russian Federation
ENERGY TRADE
35
▼ 2000 ▼ 2015
6.1% of total exports
valued at $35.8 billion
37.5% of total imports
valued at $183.7 billion
Coal and Coal Products
Crude Oil
Oil and Oil Product
Gas
Electricity
Australia
Republic of Korea
Russian Federation
Singapore
Viet Nam
Thailand
Other Asia-Pacific countries
Non Asia-Pacific
countries
Indonesia
Islamic Republic of Iran
Malaysia
Coal and Coal Products
Crude Oil
Oil and Oil Product
Gas
Electricity
Australia
Republic of Korea
Russian Federation
Singapore
Turkmenistan
Other Asia-Pacific countries
Non Asia-Pacific countries
Indonesia
Islamic Republic of Iran
MalaysiaKazakhstan
› The region’s
largest energy importer has increasingly relied on
energy from outside the Asia-Pacific
region.
Note: Import and export flow diagrams are shown in terms of trade value. Imports are not necessarily consumed domestically, but may be exported. More interactive trade flow charts are available at www.asiapacificenergy.org
Import Trends for Asia-Pacific’s Largest Energy Importer: China
ENERGY TRADE
36
Proved Fossil Fuel Reserves in Asia and the Pacific
India1.2
Uzbekistan1.1
Malaysia1.2
Myanmar1.2
Kazakhstan1.0
Kazakhstan30
Indonesia2.9
China5.4
China26
Turkmenistan17.5
RussianFederation
32.3
RussianFederation
110
104trillion cubic metres
348billion barrels
Islamic Republic of Iran
33.5Islamic
Republic of Iran158
Other Asia-Pacific
countries Other Asia-Pacific
countries24
2.3Indonesia 25,573
Turkey11,353
Kazakhstan 94,769
India 94,769
Australia 160,364
Azerbaijan 1.1
Australia 3.5
China244,010
RussianFederation
160,364
728,093 Million short tons
› Energy resources are unevenly distributed across the Asia-Pacific region. While some economies are rich in energy resources, others lack, or face dwindling reserves. Trade creates opportunities for increasing regional cooperation and energy security.
21,601
Coal Natural Gas Crude Oil
ENERGY TRADE
37
Natural Gas R/P ratio
Turkmenistan 262
Islamic Republic of Iran 166
Azerbaijan 66
Myanmar 63
Viet Nam 58
Russian Federation 56
Kazakhstan 48
India 44
Indonesia 41
China 39
Australia 38
Brunei Darussalam 35
Papua New Guinea 20
Uzbekistan 17
Malaysia 16
Pakistan 11
Bangladesh 8
Thailand 5
Other Asia-Pacific 14
Oil R/P ratio
Iran 94
Kazakhstan 49
Viet Nam 36
Australia 30
Uzbekistan 29
Russian Federation 27
Brunei Darussalam 25
China 18
India 15
Malaysia 14
Indonesia 10
Turkmenistan 6
Thailand 2
Other Asia-Pacific 3
Coal R/P ratio
Russian Federation 417
Uzbekistan 355
Azerbaijan 66
Australia 294
Japan 261
Kazakhstan 250
Republic of Korea 189
Turkey 163
India 137
Viet Nam 85
China 72
Mongolia 66
Thailand 63
Indonesia 59
Other Asia-Pacific 29
Reserves to Production Ratios*
* Reserves to production (R/P) ratios are used as an indicator of the remaining years a resource will last at current production rates. Many factors determine ratios, such as new reserve discoveries, technology changes, and economic factors; therefore, these numbers can be inaccurate.
ENERGY TRADE
38
ENERGY INVESTMENTS
Investment in Energy Projects with Private Participation, 2012-2016
0.3 2.6
14.9
0.4
US$ m
illion
40
18.9
13.8
0.0
7.9 6.3
0.2 0.2 1.1 4.2
9.8
1.9 0.4
9.4
32.4
2.3
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Arm
enia
Bang
lade
sh
China
Geor
gia
Indi
a
Indo
nesia
Kyrg
yzst
an
Lao P
DR
Mala
ysia
Mong
olia
Myan
mar
Nepa
l
Pakis
tan
Philip
pine
s
Russ
ian F
eder
atio
n
Sri L
anka
Thai
land
Turk
ey
Viet
Nam
Investment in Energy Supply, 2016$ b
illion
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0 China India Japan Russian Federation South-East Asia
Oil & gas, upstream/downstream
Coal
Renewable transport & heat
Power generation
Electricity networks
Note: Investment in energy projects with private participation covers infrastructure projects in energy (electricity and natural gas transmission and distribution) that have reached financial closure and directly or indirectly serve the public.
ENERGY INVESTMENTS
39
Investment in Power Generation, 2016
China India Japan
134$ billion
34$ billion
26$ billion
South-East Asia World
17$ billion
440$ billion
Fossil fuel
Renewable
Nuclear
› In 2016, investment in power generation and electricity networks was higher than in fossil fuel supply. New renewable capacity investments competed with fossil fuels for electricity spending in several contexts.
ENERGY INVESTMENTS
40
Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy (RISE) scores
Mobilizing investment requires strong regulatory regimes. According to a RISE assessment, Asia-Pacific economies generally demonstrate stronger policies in support of Energy Access, followed by Renewable Energy and, lastly, Energy Efficiency.
RISE, produced by the World Bank, is a set of indicators which supports the comparison of national policy and regulatory frameworks to advance sustainable energy. Twenty-seven indicators are considered across the three pillars of Energy Access, Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency to produce aggregate scores.
Source: World Bank, Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy 2016
More information is available at: rise.worldbank.org.
2016 Overall RISE score
Energy Access score
Renewable Energy score
Energy Efficiency score
Afghanistan 23 24 27 18
Armenia 68 100 63 42
Australia 81 100 73 71
Bangladesh 49 68 57 23
Cambodia 42 70 34 21
China 81 100 74 68
India 70 84 67 60
Indonesia 50 61 55 34
Islamic Republic of Iran 74 100 59 62
Japan 82 100 78 68
Kazakhstan 78 100 75 59
Kyrgyzstan 64 100 53 38
Lao PDR 33 47 46 8
Malaysia 73 100 68 52
Maldives 50 100 36 14
Mongolia 43 28 39 62
Myanmar 38 59 43 13
Nepal 36 43 45 20
Pakistan 58 59 77 38
Philippines 64 82 67 42
Republic of Korea 85 100 72 83
Russian Federation 77 100 61 70
Solomon Islands 33 40 46 12
Sri Lanka 61 67 62 54
Tajikistan 60 100 36 44
Thailand 74 100 59 63
Turkey 79 100 71 65
Uzbekistan 61 100 30 52
Vanuatu 25 48 17 11
Viet Nam 78 100 64 70
RISE score
≥ 67
33< x < 67
≤33
ENERGY INVESTMENTS
41
Charts and Data Sources
Charts and Data Sources
Page Charts and Data Sources1 Population Size in Asia and the Pacific,
1990-2017Data Source: United Nations, World Population Prospects
Urbanization Rate in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2016; Urbanization Rate, 2016Data Source: United Nations, World Population Prospects
2 Human Development Index, 2015Data Source: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
3 Total Primary Energy Supply, GDP and Energy Intensity in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2014Data Source: International Energy Agency (IEA), UN Statistics
4 Primary Energy Supply by Product in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
6 GDP Per Capita, 2015Data Source: United Nations Statistics Division, NAMAD and World Population Prospects
GDP Per Capita and Final Energy Consumption Per Capita, 2015Data Source: United Nations Statistics Division, NAMAD and World Population Prospects; ESCAP based on data from IEA and World Population Prospects
5 Final Energy Consumption in Asia and the Pacific, by Product, 2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
Final Energy Consumption by Sector in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
7 Power Plants in Asia and the Pacific, 1990, 2018Data Source: ESCAP
8 Electricity Production by Product in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
Solar/Wind/Tide % of Electricity Production in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
9 People Without Access to Electricity in Asia and the Pacific, 2014Data Source: World Bank
Rural and Urban Electrification Rates, 2014Data Source: World Bank
10 Rural and Urban Number of People with Access to Electricity in Asia and the Pacific, 1990-2101Data Source: World Bank
11 People Without Access to Clean Cooking in Asia and the Pacific, 2014Data Source: World Bank
Clean Fuels and Technologies Usage Rate, 2014Data Source: World Bank
12 Primary Cooking Fuel Mix in Selected Asia-Pacific EconomiesData Source: World Health Organization
13 GDP Per Capita, Total Final Consumption Per Capita and Energy Intensity, 2014Data Source: United Nations Statistics Division, NAMAD and World Population Prospects; IEA
14 Number of Asia-Pacific Economies with Active Energy Efficiency Targets and Regional Energy IntensityData Source: ESCAP; IEA
Energy Intensity, 2014Data Source: IEA
15 Decomposition Analysis of Energy Use in Asia and the PacificData Source: IEA and UN Statistics
16 Energy Intensity by Global RegionData Source: IEA
Electricity Losses as a Percentage of Output, 2014Data Source: IEA
17 Renewable Share of Total Final Energy ConsumptionData Source: IEA and UN Statistics
2014 Modern Renewable Energy Share of Total Final Energy Consumption and Annualized Change 2012-2014Data Source: IEA and UN Statistics
42
18 Top Five Asia-Pacific Economies for Installed CapacityData Source: UN Statistics
Modern Renewable Energy Consumption in Asia and the Pacific, by Resource, 1990-2014Data Source: IEA and UN Statistics
19 Renewable Power Mix for Top Ten Asia-Pacific Economies for Total Renewable Electricity GenerationData Source: IEA
20 Installed Renewable Capacity and Investment in Asia and the Pacific, 2007-2016Data Source: IRENA; Bloomberg New Energy Finance
Small Distributed Capacity Investment, 2016Data Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance
21 Solar Potential and Solar Plant Locations, 2018Data Source: NASA; ESCAP
22 Wind Potential and Wind Power Plant Locations, 2018Data Source: NASA; ESCAP
23 Renewable Energy Jobs by Sector, 2016Data Source: IRENA
24 Estimated Jobs in Renewable Energy, 2016Data Source: IRENA
25 PM 2.5 Annual Mean Levels (2014) and Coal Power Plant LocationsData sources: NASA and ESCAP
26 PM2.5 Mean Annual Exposure, 2015Data Source: WHO
27 CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, by Global Region, 1990-2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion in Asia and the Pacific, by Fuel Source, 2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
28 Per Capita CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, 2015Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
29 CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, by Sector, 2014Data Source: IEA
30 CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion in Asia and the Pacific, by Sector, 2014Data Source: ESCAP based on data from IEA
31 Fossil Fuel Subsidisation in Selected Asia-Pacific Economies, 2016Data Source: IEA
32 Average Gasoline Pump Prices in Asia and the Pacific, 2014Data Source: World Bank
Average Pump Prices, 2014Data Source: World Bank
33 Average Electricity Prices, 2016Data Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance
34 Export Trends for Asia-Pacific’s Largest Energy Exporter: The Russian FederationData Source: UN Comtrade
36 Import Trends for Asia-Pacific’s Largest Energy Importer: ChinaData Source: UN Comtrade
37 Proved Fossil Fuel Reserves in Asia and the Pacific, End of 2016Data Source: BP
38 Reserves to Production RatiosData Source: BP
39 Investment in Energy Supply, 2016Data Source: IEA
Investment in Energy Projects with Private Participation, 2012-2016Data Source: World Bank
40 Investment in Power Generation, 2016Data Source: IEA
41 Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy (RISE) scoresData Source: World Bank
Charts and Data Sources
43
www.asiapacificenergy.org