1
Journal of Reproductive Immunology 84 (2010) 206–207 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Reproductive Immunology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jreprimm Letters to the Editor Statins for the treatment of obstetric complications in antiphospholipid syndrome? Keywords: Statins Antiphospholipid syndrome Pregnancy Loss In her paper, “Pravastatin prevents miscarriages in antiphospholipid antibody-treated mice,” [J. Reprod. Immunol. 2009;82(November (2)):126–31] Dr. Girardi’s conclusions go well beyond her data when she recom- mends the use of statin drugs to prevent human pregnancy loss. Pravastatin, and all statin drugs, are FDA Category X for pregnancy (contraindicated), because of teratogenic- ity, placental disruption (Kenis et al., 2005; Forbes et al., 2008), and theoretical long-term fetal neurological damage (Ponce et al., 2008). Statins may disrupt gonadal stem cell development in fetuses, potentially leading to later infertil- ity or other problems (Ding et al., 2008). Dr. Girardi alleges safety of statins in pregnancy based on studies underpow- ered to detect teratogenicity, one of which explicitly states that “simvastatin and lovastatin remain contraindicated during pregnancy (Pollack et al., 2005). Even if the mechanism described in the article does account for a significant proportion of human pregnancy losses, a fact not yet established, a statin trial for pregnancy loss cannot take place without much stronger indication of human safety, including primate trials, and IRB approvals under strictest conditions, including long-term follow-up of neurological development and perhaps fertility of the offspring. Given the ubiquity of statins in the community, the desperation of couples who lose pregnancies, and the differences between mice and humans, a single experience in mice is insufficient to suggest a clinical trial in pregnant women. References Ding, J., Jiang, D., Kurczy, M., Nalepka, J., Dudley, B., Merkel, E.I., Porter, F.D., Evwin, A., Winograd, N., Burgess, J., Molyneaux, K., 2008. Inhibition of HMG CoA reductase reveals an unexpected role for cholesterol during PGC migration in the mouse. BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 120. Forbes, K., Hurst, L.M., Aplin, J.D., Westwood, M., Gibson, J.M., 2008. Statins are detrimental to human placental development and function; use of statins during early pregnancy is inadvisable. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 12, 2295–2296. Kenis, I., Tartakover-Matalon, S., Cherepnin, N., Drucker, L., Fishman, A., Pomeranz, M., Lishner, M., 2005. Simvastatin has deleterious effects on human first trimester placental explants. Hum. Reprod. 20, 2866–2872. Ponce, J., de La Ossa, N.P., Hurtado, O., MIllan, M., Arenillas, J.F., Davalos, A., Gasuli, T., 2008. Simvastatin reduces the association of NMDA recep- tors to lipid rafts: a cholesterol mediated effect in neuroprotection. Stroke 39, 1269–1275. Pollack, P.S., Shields, K.E., Burnett, D.M., Osborne, M.J., Cunningham, M.K., Stepanavage, M.E., 2005. Pregnancy outcomes after maternal expo- sure to simvastatin and lovastatin. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Theratol. 73, 888–896. Michael D. Lockshin a,b,c a Barbara Volcker Center for Women and Rheumatic Diseases, New York, United States b Mary Kirkland Center for Lupus Research at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, United States c Medicine and Obstetrics-Gynecology, Joan and Sanford Weill College of Medicine, New York, United States Silvia S. Pierangeli Antiphospholipid Standardization Laboratory, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States Corresponding author at: Brackenridge Hall 2.108, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0883, United States. Tel.: +1 409 772 0222; fax: +1 409 772 0223. E-mail address: [email protected] (S.S. Pierangeli) 11 October 2009 doi:10.1016/j.jri.2009.11.007 Author’s response to ‘Statins for the treatment of obstet- ric complications in Antiphospholipid Syndrome?’ In my paper “Pravastatin prevents miscarriage in antiphospholipid antibody-treated mice” [J. Reprod. Immunol. 82 (November (2)) (2009) 126–131], I do not recommend the use of statin drugs to prevent human pregnancy loss. The first sentence of the concluding paragraph of my review article reads “We recognize that these studies were conducted in mice and that clinical 0165-0378/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Statins for the treatment of obstetric complications in antiphospholipid syndrome?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Statins for the treatment of obstetric complications in antiphospholipid syndrome?

Journal of Reproductive Immunology 84 (2010) 206–207

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Reproductive Immunology

journa l homepage: www.e lsev ier .com/ locate / j repr imm

Letters to the Editor

Statins for the treatment of obstetric complications inantiphospholipid syndrome?

Keywords:StatinsAntiphospholipid syndromePregnancy Loss

In her paper, “Pravastatin prevents miscarriagesin antiphospholipid antibody-treated mice,” [J. Reprod.Immunol. 2009;82(November (2)):126–31] Dr. Girardi’sconclusions go well beyond her data when she recom-mends the use of statin drugs to prevent human pregnancyloss.

Pravastatin, and all statin drugs, are FDA Category Xfor pregnancy (contraindicated), because of teratogenic-ity, placental disruption (Kenis et al., 2005; Forbes et al.,2008), and theoretical long-term fetal neurological damage(Ponce et al., 2008). Statins may disrupt gonadal stem celldevelopment in fetuses, potentially leading to later infertil-ity or other problems (Ding et al., 2008). Dr. Girardi allegessafety of statins in pregnancy based on studies underpow-ered to detect teratogenicity, one of which explicitly statesthat “simvastatin and lovastatin remain contraindicatedduring pregnancy (Pollack et al., 2005).

Even if the mechanism described in the article doesaccount for a significant proportion of human pregnancylosses, a fact not yet established, a statin trial for pregnancyloss cannot take place without much stronger indication ofhuman safety, including primate trials, and IRB approvalsunder strictest conditions, including long-term follow-upof neurological development and perhaps fertility of theoffspring. Given the ubiquity of statins in the community,the desperation of couples who lose pregnancies, and thedifferences between mice and humans, a single experiencein mice is insufficient to suggest a clinical trial in pregnantwomen.

References

Ding, J., Jiang, D., Kurczy, M., Nalepka, J., Dudley, B., Merkel, E.I., Porter, F.D.,Evwin, A., Winograd, N., Burgess, J., Molyneaux, K., 2008. Inhibition of

HMG CoA reductase reveals an unexpected role for cholesterol duringPGC migration in the mouse. BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 120.

Forbes, K., Hurst, L.M., Aplin, J.D., Westwood, M., Gibson, J.M., 2008. Statinsare detrimental to human placental development and function; useof statins during early pregnancy is inadvisable. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 12,2295–2296.

0165-0378/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Kenis, I., Tartakover-Matalon, S., Cherepnin, N., Drucker, L., Fishman,A., Pomeranz, M., Lishner, M., 2005. Simvastatin has deleteriouseffects on human first trimester placental explants. Hum. Reprod. 20,2866–2872.

Ponce, J., de La Ossa, N.P., Hurtado, O., MIllan, M., Arenillas, J.F., Davalos, A.,Gasuli, T., 2008. Simvastatin reduces the association of NMDA recep-tors to lipid rafts: a cholesterol mediated effect in neuroprotection.Stroke 39, 1269–1275.

Pollack, P.S., Shields, K.E., Burnett, D.M., Osborne, M.J., Cunningham, M.K.,Stepanavage, M.E., 2005. Pregnancy outcomes after maternal expo-sure to simvastatin and lovastatin. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol.Theratol. 73, 888–896.

Michael D. Lockshin a,b,c

a Barbara Volcker Center for Women andRheumatic Diseases, New York, United Statesb Mary Kirkland Center for Lupus Research at

the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York,United States

c Medicine and Obstetrics-Gynecology,Joan and Sanford Weill College of Medicine,

New York, United States

Silvia S. Pierangeli ∗

Antiphospholipid StandardizationLaboratory, University of Texas Medical

Branch, Galveston, TX, United States

∗ Corresponding author at: BrackenridgeHall 2.108, 301 University Boulevard,

Galveston, TX 77555-0883, United States.Tel.: +1 409 772 0222;fax: +1 409 772 0223.

E-mail address: [email protected](S.S. Pierangeli)

11 October 2009doi:10.1016/j.jri.2009.11.007

Author’s response to ‘Statins for the treatment of obstet-ric complications in Antiphospholipid Syndrome?’

In my paper “Pravastatin prevents miscarriage inantiphospholipid antibody-treated mice” [J. Reprod.

Immunol. 82 (November (2)) (2009) 126–131], I do notrecommend the use of statin drugs to prevent humanpregnancy loss. The first sentence of the concludingparagraph of my review article reads “We recognize thatthese studies were conducted in mice and that clinical