53
Table S1 List of literature references on soil pH, concentrations of C, N, P, S and C-N-P-S stoichiometry in forested soils. No . Countr y Provin ce Town Tem (°C ) * Pre TS & PL Duration Soil properties Reference (mm) # 1 Argenti na Bueno s Aires Pehuen-Co 15.5 669 CF I 45 pH, SOC, TN, C:N,AP (Amiotti et al. 2013) 2 Argenti na Misio nses, Corri entes Santo, Candelaria, Ituzaingo, Iguazu Tome 20 160 0 CF I 15,31,25, SOC (Eclesia et al. 2012) 3 Austral ia Canbe rra Billy Billy 20 622 CF I 16 C:N (Guo et al. 2007) 4 Austral ia New South Wales 10. 5 862 CF I 1,3,23 SOC, TN,C:N (Allen, 2009 ) 5 Austral ia Victorian 15. 7 567 EU I 5,5,21,22,28,29, SOC, TN, C:N (Cunningham, 2012 } 6 Austral ia Weste rn Esperance 16. 9 619 EU,CF I 13,13,13,13,13 pH, SOC, TN, AN, C:N (Carson et al. 2010)

static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

Table S1 List of literature references on soil pH, concentrations of C, N, P, S and C-N-P-S stoichiometry in forested soils.

No. Country Province TownTem (°C)*

PreTS&

  PL¶

Duration Soil properties Reference(mm)#    

1 ArgentinaBuenos Aires

Pehuen-Co 15.5 669 CF I 45 pH, SOC, TN, C:N,AP (Amiotti et al. 2013)

2 Argentina

Misionses, Corrientes

Santo, Candelaria, Ituzaingo, Iguazu

Tome20 1600 CF I 15,31,25, SOC (Eclesia et al. 2012)

3 AustraliaCanberra

Billy Billy 20 622 CF I 16 C:N (Guo et al. 2007)

4 Australia New South Wales 10.5 862 CF I 1,3,23 SOC, TN,C:N (Allen, 2009 )

5 Australia Victorian 15.7 567 EU I 5,5,21,22,28,29, SOC, TN, C:N(Cunningham, 2012 }

6 AustraliaWestern Australia

Esperance 16.9 619 EU,CF I 13,13,13,13,13 pH, SOC, TN, AN, C:N (Carson et al. 2010)

7 Australia Western Australia 15 865 EU I 7,8,8,8,8,10 SOC (Mendham, 2002 }

8 Australia South Australia 18 640 EU,CF I 6,11,15,17,22,32,35,51SOC, TN,TP, AN,C:N,

C:P, N:P(Kasel, 2007}

9 Brazil Itatinga San Paulo 19.2 1370 BF,CF I 20,60,60 SOC(Maquere et al. 2008)

10 Brazil Minas Belo Oriente 25 1163 EU I 4,8,13,19,22,29,32,33,34 pH, SOC (Lima et al. 2006)

Page 2: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

Gerais

11 BrazilPlanaltina

Embraoa Cerrados 14.5 2000 CF I 8,30 SOC(Marchao et al. 2009)

12 BrazilRia Grande

San Francesisco De Paulapaulo

14.5 2469 CF, I 20pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

C:P, N:P, TS(Garbin et al. 2006)

13 BurialMinas Gerais

Cerrado 21 1540 EU I 7,7,20 pH, SOC (Zinn et al. 2002)

14 CanadaSaskatchewan

Prince Albert 0.55 424 CF,CF I 50,50 SOC, TN, C:N(Pinno and Bélanger 2008)

15 Canada Alberta Linario, Westlock 3 631 BF G 2, 9, 80 pH, SOC, TN, TP, C:N (Arevalo et al., 2009)

16 Canada Quebec 4 1113 BF G 4 SOC, TN, C:NBambrick et al., 2010

17 Canada Quebec 3 1079 BF G 4 SOC, TN, C:NBambrick et al., 2010

18 Canada Ontario 6 830 BF,CF G 8, 21 SOC, TN, TP, C:NBambrick et al., 2010

19 ChileCentral Valley

Paillaco 10.8 1700 BF I 16,120pH, SOC, TN,TP,

AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P(Huygens et al. 2005)

Page 3: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

20 China China Shenmu 8.4 437 N-fixers I 28SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P,

N:P(Wei 2009)

21 ChinaChongqing

Beipei 16.2 885 BF G 15SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Ren 2010; Ren et al. 2010)

22 ChinaChongqing

Changrong 17.7 1117 CF G 12 SOC, TN, C:N (Zheng et al. 2008)

23 ChinaChongqing

Hechaung 18.1 1116 CF,BF G 8,8SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Kang et al. 2012)

24 China Fujian Nan'an 20.8 1500 BF H 6pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Li 1999)

25 China Fujian Sanming 19.5 1700 BF H 35pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Shen 2002)

26 China Gansu Anding, Dingxi 6.5 460 CF G 3,6,10SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Ding et al. 2010)

Page 4: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

27 China Gansu Anjiapo, Xian 5.9 437N-fixers,

CFG 25 SOC, TN, C:N, C:P

(Chen et al. 2007; Gong et al. 2006)

28 China GansuLianchuan, Yuzhong

5.9 337 N-fixers H7,11,20,43,10,21,42,10,21,4

2pH, SOC, TN,AN,AP,

C:N(Jiang 2007)

29 China GansuLianjiabian,

Heshui7.4

587.6

CF H 9,17,pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Jia 2006)

30 ChinaGuangdong

Heshan 21.7 1801 BF H 14SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Li et al. 2002)

31 ChinaGuangdong

Heshan 22.5 1534 EU H 3,4 SOC, TN, C:N (Wu et al. 2013)

32 ChinaGuangxi

Huanjiang 18.5 1407 BF G 5 C:N (Yuan et al. 2007)

33 ChinaGuangxi

Pingguo 21.5 1500 BF G 10,10,10 SOC, TN,AN, C:N (Yu and Sun 2012)

34 ChinaGuangxi

Yishan 19.3 1169 CF H 32SOC, TN,TP,AN,AP,

C:P(Liang et al. 1993)

35 ChinaGuangxi

Yishan 19.3 1169 BF H 45 SOC, TN,AP, C:N (Liang et al. 1993)

Page 5: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

36 ChinaGuizhou

Qingzhen 15 1200 BF G 4SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Luo et al. 2003)

37 China Hainan Jianfengge 19.7 3000 CF H 34pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Wei et al. 2009b)

38 China Hebei Saihanba -1.4 450 CF I 37,40 SOC, TN, C:N (Liu et al. 2009)

39 ChinaHeilongjiang

Laoshan 1 626 CF G 23,26,35,45,46 SOC, TN, C:N (An et al. 2012)

40 ChinaHeilongjiang

Nehe 2 450 BF H 8,8,8pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Zhang et al. 1997)

41 China Henan Luoning 14.3641.

5BF G 3

SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Su et al. 2007)

42 China Henan Luoning 13.7 700 BF G 5,28 SOC, AN, AP (Yun 2010)

43 China Hubei Qingquan, Xishui 16.9 1350 BF G 13,23,75 pH, SOC, TN, C:N (Wei 2009)

44 China Hubei Qingquan, Xishui 16.9 1350 N-fixers G 7 pH, SOC, TN, C:N (Wei 2009)

Page 6: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

45 ChinaInner Mongolia

Duolun, Xilinguole

1.9389.

4BF,CF I 26,26

pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Wang 2007)

46 ChinaInner Mongolia

Huhehaote 5.6 420 CF I 10,20SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Yan and Wang 1996)

47 ChinaInner Mongolia

Keerxin 6.4 450 BF G 5,10,15pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Bai 2008)

48 ChinaInner Mongolia

Shadi, Keerqin 6.3 430 CF I 32pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Hu et al. 2009)

49 ChinaInner Mongolia

Shadi, Keerqin 6.4 450 CF I 15,24,30pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Liu et al. 2010)

50 China Jiangsu Nantong 15.8 1064 BF,CF H 7. 16,28SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P,

N:P(Yang 2005)

51 China Jiangsu Wujiang 16 1134 BF,CF G 25, 30,35pH, SOC, TN, TP, C:N,

TS(Wang et al. 2010)

52 China Jiangxi Taihe 18.6 1360 BF,CF H 9 SOC, TN, AN,AP, C:N (Chen 1995)

Page 7: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

53 ChinaLiaoning

Jianping 6.5 476 BF G 5,10,15,20 SOC, TN, C:N (Mao and Zeng 2010)

54 ChinaLiaoning

Jianping 6.5 476 BF G 5,10,15,20 SOC, TN, C:N (Mao et al. 2009)

55 ChinaLiaoning

Jianping 5.2 443 N-fixers H 7 SOC, TN,AN,AP, C:N(Jia et al. 1994; Jia and Yang 1994)

56 ChinaLiaoning

Kezuo, Chaoyang 8.2500.

9CF H 7,26

pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Shen and Jiang 1998)

57 China Ningxia Guyuan 7 420 N-fixers G 8pH, SOC, TN,AP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(An and Huang 2006)

58 China Ningxia Hechaun, Guyuan 7 420 N-fixers G 3, 13, 23SOC, TN,AP, C:N, C:P,

N:P(Chen et al. 2010)

59 China Ningxia Yanchi 8.46276.

3N-fixers I 7,12,27 SOC, TN, AN,AP, C:N (Song et al. 2012)

60 China Qinghai Datong 2.9 556 N-fixers G 6,9 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

61 China Qinghai Delingha 3.6 38 Mixed G 9,9,9 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

Page 8: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

62 China Qinghai Delingha 2.7 185 BF G 3,9 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

63 China Qinghai Dulan 2.7 198 BF G 9,27,33 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

64 China Qinghai Gangcha -1.3 380 N-fixers G 8,9,9 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

65 China Qinghai Geermu 4.3 41.2 N-fixers G 9.9 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

66 China Qinghai Gonghe 4 318 Mixed H 9,11 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

67 China Qinghai Guide 7.2 252 N-fixer G 13,13,13,13 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

68 China Qinghai Haiyan 3 400 Mixed G 10,23 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

69 China Qinghai Haiyan 0.2 350 N-fixers G 14,29,29 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

70 China Qinghai Huzhu 0.9 650 N-fixers H 3,9,11,29 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

Page 9: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

71 China Qinghai Ledu 7.3 330 BF G 8,11,11,11 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

72 China Qinghai Meiyuan 0.85 523 N-fixers G 8 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

73 China Qinghai Pingan 1.4 450 Mixed G 26 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

74 China Qinghai Rongmuhuang 4.3 43 Mixed H 4,21,31,57 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

75 China Qinghai Tianjun 4.3 41.2 N-fixers G 8,8 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

76 China Qinghai Wulan 4.2 180 N-fixers G 9,9,10,21 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

77 China Qinghai Xiangride 3.9 168 BF G 8 pH, SOC, TN,C:N (Shi et al. 2015)

78 China Shaanxi Ansai 8.8505.

3CF G 10,10,30 SOC, TN, C:N (Han et al. 2012)

79 China Shaanxi Ansai 8.8 541 BF G 2,5,27,30SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Dong et al. 2008)

Page 10: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

80 China Shaanxi Ansai 8.8505.

3BF G 30 SOC, TN, C:N (Han et al. 2012)

81 China Shaanxi Ansai 8.8505.

3BF, CF,

MFG 30,30

pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Dai et al. 2008)

82 China Shaanxi Ansai 8.8545.

2N-fixers G 10,17,26,34,40,50

SOC, TN,TP,C:N, C:P, N:P

(Cui et al. 2012)

83 China Shaanxi Ansai 8.8505.

3N-fixers G 10,30 SOC, TN, C:N (Han et al. 2012)

84 China Shaanxi Ansai 8.8 505N-fixers, BF, CF, Mixed

G 30,30,30,30,30,pH, SOC, TN,TP,

AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P(Xue et al. 2007)

85 China Shaanxi Fuxian 9567.

7N-fixers H 10,20,40,50 SOC, TN,AP, C:N (Lu etal., 2009)

86 China ShaanxiHuaiping, Yongshou

10.8601.

3CF, BF H 10, 25, 44

SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Zhang and Chang 2006)

87 China ShaanxiHuaiping, Yongshou

10.8601.

3BF H 10,44,

SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Wang et al. 2007)

Page 11: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

88 China Shaanxi Mizhi 8.4 422 CF G 24,49 SOC, TN, C:N,AP(Dong and Zheng 2008)

89 China Shaanxi Shenmu 8.4 437 CF I 28,35pH, SOC, TN,TP, AP,

C:N(Wei et al. 2009a)

90 China Shaanxi Wuqi 7.8 480 BF G 60 SOC, TN,TP, AP, C:N (Jiao et al. 2006)

91 China Shaanxi Wuqi 7.8 480 N-fixers G 4,9,18,33 SOC, TN,TP, C:N (Wang et al. 2010)

92 China Shaanxi Wuqi 7.8 480 N-fixers G 18 SOC, AN, AP (Jiao et al., 2006)

93 China Shaanxi Xunyi 7 580 CF H 12,17,22,28,32,42,65,70,pH, SOC, TN, AN,AP,

C:N(Wang et al. 2007)

94 China Shaanxi Zhifanggou, Ansai 8.8 549 N-fixers H 10,22,26,30SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Zhang et al. 2007)

95 China Shaanxi Qianyang 10.8 653 CF G 20 SOC,AN, AP (Hu et al. 2007)

96 ChinaShandong

Dezhou 13.1 650 BF G 4,7 SOC, TN (Zhang et al. 2008)

Page 12: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

97 China Shanxi Wuzhai 1.5 435 N-fixers H 1,2,3,4 pH, SOC, TN,,AP, C:N (Niu et al. 2003)

98 China Shanxi Wuzhai 4 454 N-fixers H 5,15,25 SOC, TN,AP, C:N (Ji et al. 2007)

99 China Sichuan Danlen 16.6 1233 BF G 3 SOC, TN,AN,AP, C:N (Ma et al. 2010)

100 China Sichuan Hongya 14.3 1560 BF G 4,5,6,7, SOC, TN, C:N (Chen et al. 2008)

101 China Sichuan Hongya 14.3 1560 BB G 7SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Yan,et al., 2008)

102 China Yunnan Dongchuang 15.7 828 N-fixers I 7,7,7,11pH, SOC, TN,TP,

AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P(Shen et al. 2002)

103 China YunnanXiaohenshan,

Yuanmei21.9

630.8

BF H 6,13,13,13pH, SOC, TN,TP,

AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P(Li et al. 2006)

104 China Yunnan Xishuangbanna 22.1 1400 BF G 3,7,20 SOC, TN,AN, C:N (Yang et al. 2004)

Page 13: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

105 ChinaZhejiang

Lanxi 17.3 1700 BF H 17,32 SOC, TN, C:N(Jiang and Zhou 2003)

106 ChinaZhejiang

Linan 15.9 1424CF, N-fixers

H 32, 32SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Jiang et al. 2007)

107 Congo Pointe Noire 25 1200 EU I 7.5,17,30 SOC(Mendez-Millan, 2014)

108 Ecuador

Aglomerados Cotopaxi

Cotopaxi 8.1 1130 CF I 7.5,17.5,22.5pH, SOC, TN,TP,

AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P(Farley and Kelly 2004)

109 Ecuador Ecuadorian Andes 21.5 3200N-fixers, Mixed,

EUG 7.5,17.5 SOC (Rhoades, 2000 )

110 Ethiopia Amhara Bahir Dar 21.7 1500 EU G 5.5,5.5 SOC, TN, C:N (Engda et al.)

111 Ethiopia Amhara Selam 25 550 EU I 16,16, SOC, TN, C:P,AP(Girmay and Singh 2012)

112 Ethiopia Atnogo Belete Forest 19.4 1517 CF, EU G 22,22,22, pH, SOC (Lemma et al. 2006)

Page 14: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

113 Ethiopia Lepis Ganbo 20 1200 EU, CF G 15,17 SOC, TN, AP(Lemenih et al. 2004)

114 Ethiopia Mailarly 20 1200 EU, CF G 30,30 SOC, TN,C:N(Poultouchidou, 2012)

115 Finland6 Sampling Sites

Tammisaari, Tammela, Vilppula,

Petajavesi, Kalvia, Toholampi

5.7 620CF,

MixedG

8,8,8,9,9,9,9,18,18,18,18,18,19,19,19,

pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Karhu et al. 2011)

116 GermanyCanstein

Wideshausen 8 760 BF I 7pH, SOC, TN,TP, AN,

AP, C:N, C:P, N:P(Jug et al. 1999)

117 Germany Waren Gulzow 8.2 543 BF I 6,12 pH, SOC, TN,TP, AP (Kahle et al. 2007)

118 Germany Waren Vipperow 8 640 BF I 6,12 pH, SOC, TN,TP, AP (Kahle et al. 2007)

119 Iceland

Dooary, Clontycoe, Baunoge,

Glenbarrow

9.6 800 CF I 9,16,30,45,47 pH, SOC (Black et al. 2009)

120 Iceland Hallormsstadur 3.4 735 CF H 14,21,26,39,53,97SOC,TN,TP,AN,AP,C:

N, C:P, N:P(Ritter 2007)

121 Iceland Hallormsstadur 3.4 735 BF H 53pH, SOC, TN,TP,C:N,

C:P, N:P(Ritter 2007)

Page 15: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

122 India Assam Banthra 25.5 900 BF G 4,4,4,4 SOC, TN, C:N(Srivastava et al. 2014)

123 India Uttar Pradesh 25 977N-fixers, BF, EU

H 3,3,3 SOC, TN,C:N (Mishra, 2003 )

124 IranMazandaran

Sari 16.8 733 BF,CF G 21,21,21 SOC, TN, C:N (Kooch et al. 2012)

125 ItalySicilian Channel

Pantelleria 17 860 EU,BF G 40 SOC (Novara et al. 2011)

126 Italy Udine Flaibana 13.5 1200BF, N-Fixers

G 20 SOC, C:N(Del Galdo et al. 2003)

127 Lithuania Akademija 6.1 640 CF G 50,50 SOC, TN, C:N (Armolaitis, 2013 )

128 Mexico Oaxaca, Juquila 21 1917CF,

MixedG 15,45,75,15,45,75 SOC,N:P

(Bautista-Cruz, 2005)

129New

Zealand

Central South Island

Craigieburn 2 1400 CF I 20pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

C:P, N:P(Chen et al. 2000)

130New

Zealand

Central South Island

Okuku 10 1200 CF I 25pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P, TS, Sulfate

(Davis et al., 1991; 2001)

Page 16: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

131New

Zealand

Central South Island

Teviotade, Craigieburn

10 800 CF I 10,10,20,15,23,30,47,52pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P, TS, Sulfate

(Davis, 1998, 2001)

132Lammerlaw, Lake

Dia, Tara , Benmore ,Lyndon

133New

ZealandChristchurch

Craigieburn 8 1440 CF I 15,17 pH, SOC, TN, C:N(Alfredsson et al. 1998)

134New

ZealandManawatu

13.2 960 CF I 13,16,18,20,24,30, pH, SOC, TN, C:N (Giddens et al. 1997)

135New

ZealandNorthland

Hill 9.5 1400 CF I 17,17,19pH, SOC, TN, C:N, TS,

Sulfate(Groenendijk et al. 2002)

136New

ZealandPalmerston

Massey 12.2 1291 CF I 20 pH, SOC, TN, C:N (Parfitt et al. 1997)

137New

ZealandRotorua Purukohukohu 10 1500 CF I 19

pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N, C:P, N:P

(Ross et al. 1999)

138New

ZealandMarton, Ohakune,

Westmere10.9 1353 BF, CF I 20,20,20,100,100 SOC, TN,TP,AP, C:N (Sparling et al. 2000)

Page 17: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

139Puerto Rico

Lajas. 25 1100 N-fixers I 7 SOC, TN, C:N (Resh et al. 2002)

140Puerto Rico

Toa Baja 27 1600 N-fixers I 15 SOC, TN, C:N (Resh et al. 2002)

141Puerto Rico

Sierra De Cayey 21 2000 BF I 10,20,30,60,80pH, SOC, TN,TP,

AN,AP, C:N, C:P, N:P(Marin‐spiotta et al. 2009)

142 Russia Krasnoyarsk 1.6 500 CF, BF I 27,27,27,27,27,27,pH, SOC, TN,TP, C:N,

Sulfate(Menyailo, 2002 )

143 Turkey Artvin 14.5 350N-fixer, Mixed

H 10,10 SOC, TN, C:N (Yüksek, 2012 )

144 UK

Cork, Mallow, Cashel Et Al.,

9 1200BF, CF, Mixed

I17,18,19,20,22,22,33,34,37,

41,51,42,68,67,68SOC (Wellock 2011)

145 UKHarpenden

West Common 9.5 647 N-fixers G 23,85,117 pH, SOC (Poulton et al. 2003)

146 Uruguay

Florida, San Jose De Mayo

Anise, Anise, Barrios,San Pdero

18.5 1261 BF, EU I 12,19,10,30,28,50,20,45,15 SOC,TN,AN(Berthrong et al. 2012)

Page 18: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

147 USChinchuck

Kamae 21 4000BF, N-fixers

G 16 SOC, TN, C:N (Resh et al. 2002)

148 US Georgia Newton 19.3 1370 CF G 3,7,14,200pH, SOC, TN,TP,AP,

C:N, C:P, N:P(Markewitz et al. 2002)

149 US Hawaii Hakalau 20 4600 EU G 2,4,10 pH, SOC, TN, C:N(Zou and Bashkin 1998)

150 US Hawaii Hamakua 21 3800 EU G 12 pH, SOC(Bashkin and Binkley 1998)

151 US Hawaii Kamae 21 4000 N-fixers G 15 SOC, TN, C:N (Song et al. 2013)

152 US Iowa Allamakee 8.2 871 CF, BF G 51 SOC, TN,C:N (Sauer et al. 2012)

153 USMichigan

Cass 10 940 CF,BF G 50,53 SOC, TN,TP, C:N (Morris et al. 2007)

154 USMichigan

Kellogg 9.7 890BF,

MixedG 10,10,200 SOC

(DeGryze et al. 2004)

Page 19: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

155 USNebraska

Halsey 10.9 800CF,

MixedI 25,25,55,72 SOC, TN,AP, C:N (Mellor et al. 2013)

156 USNebraska

Syracuse 10.9 800 BF I 130 pH, SOC, TN,AP, C:N (Martens et al. 2004)

157 US Oregon Corvallis 10.4 1024 CF I 11 SOC, TN, C:N(Sharrow and Ismail 2004)

158 USSouth Carolina

Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N,(Mobley et al. 2015; Richter et al. 1999)

159 USNorth Dakoto

Mandan 4 400 N-fixers I 18, 43 SOC, TN, AN(Springsteen, et al., 2010)

160 US Oregon Columbia Plateau 11.4 219 BF G 7,8,9 SOC, TN, C:N (Sartori et al., 2007)

161 US Illinois Pope Country 13.8 1020 CF, BF G pH, SOC, TN(Rolfe & Boggess, 1973)

162 US FloridaSuwannee,

Osceola22.1

11390 CF I 40, 45 SOC (Nair ET AL., 2007)

163 US Kanasas Flint Hill 12 835 CF I 45 SOC, TN, C:N(McKinley & Blair, 2008)

164 US Virginia Piedmont 13 1085 CF G 15, 60 SOC, TN, TP(Hosner & Graney, 1970)

165 US Minnesota

3.4 604.5

BF G,

6,7,6,15,7 SOC (Grigal & Berguson, 1998)

Page 20: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

I

166 US Hawaii Hillo 21 4000 BF G 3 pH, C:N(Binkley and Resh 1999)

* Mean annual temperature (MAT, °C)#Mean annual precipitation (MAP, mm year-1)&Tree species (TS), the abbreviations of EU, CF BF Mixed and N-fixers were Eucalyptus, coniferous species, broadleaf species, mixed forests with broadleaf and coniferous species, and for plantation with N-fixers, respectively.¶Prior land-use (PL), the abbreviations H , G and I were barren land, cropland and grassland, respectively.

References

1. Alfredsson H, Condron LM, Clarholm M, Davis MR (1998) Changes in soil acidity and organic matter following the establishment of conifers on former grassland in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management 112: 245-252.

2. Allen D, Mendham D, Cowie A, Wang W, Dalal R, Raison R (2009) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil are reduced following afforestation of pasture lands in three contrasting climatic zones. Soil Research 47: 443-458.

3. Amiotti NM, Zalba P, Ares A, Rossi JM (2013) Coniferous afforestation increases soil carbon in maritime sand dunes. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 59: 289-304. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2011.627326.

4. An J, Wang WJ, Wang HY, Su DX, Qing L, Zu YG (2012) Effect of forest and farm on vertical patterns of soil carbon,nitrogen and other parameters in Northeast China. Bulletin of Botanical Research 32.147: 331-338.

5. An SS, Huang YM (2006) Study on the ameliorate benefits of caragana korshinskii shrubwood to soil properties in Loess Hilly Area. Scientia Silvae Sinicae: 70-74.

6. Armolaitis K, Aleinikovienė J, Lubytė J, Žėkaitė V, Garbaravičius P (2013) Stability of soil organic carbon in agro and forest ecosystems on Arenosol. Z ̌emdirbyste ̇ (Agriculture) 100: 227-234.

Page 21: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

7. Arevalo, C.B.M., Bhatti, J.S., Chang, S.X. & Sidders, D. (2009) Ecosystem carbon stocks and distribution under different land-uses in north central Alberta, Canada. Forest Ecology And Management, 257, 1776-1785.

8. Bai XS (2008) Effects of farmland afforestation on ecosystem carbon stock and its distribution pattern in semi-arid region of Northwest China. Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou.Master degree desertation.

9. Bambrick, A.D., Whalen, J.K., Bradley, R.L., Cogliastro, A., Gordon, A.M., Olivier, A. & Thevathasan, N.V. (2010) Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon in tree-based intercropping systems in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems, 79, 343-353.

10. Bashkin MA, Binkley D (1998) Changes in soil carbon following afforestation in Hawaii. Ecology 79: 828-833.

11. Bautista-Cruz A, del Castillo RF (2005) Soil changes during secondary succession in a tropical montane cloud forest area. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 906-914.

12. Berthrong S, Piñeiro G, Jobbagy E, Jackson R (2012) Soil C and N changes with afforestation of grasslands across gradients of precipitation and plantation age. Ecological Applications.

13. Binkley D, Resh SC (1999) Rapid changes in soils following Eucalyptus afforestation in Hawaii. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 222-225.

14. Black K, Byrne KA, Mencuccini M, Tobin B, Nieuwenhuis M, Reidy B, Bolger T, Saiz G, Green C, Farrell ET (2009) Carbon stock and stock changes across a Sitka spruce chronosequence on surface-water gley soils. Forestry 82: 255-272.

15. Carson JK, Gleeson DB, Clipson N, Murphy DV (2010) Afforestation alters community structure of soil fungi. Fungal biology 114: 580-584.

16. Chen C, Condron L, Davis M, Sherlock R (2000) Effects of afforestation on phosphorus dynamics and biological properties in a New Zealand grassland soil. Plant and Soil 220: 151-163.

17. Chen L, Gong J, Fu B, Huang Z, Huang Y, Gui L (2007) Effect of land use conversion on soil organic carbon sequestration in the loess hilly area, loess plateau of China. Ecological Research 22: 641-648.

Page 22: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

18. Chen XH, Zhang J, Zhao AJ, Yu HQ (2008) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics of forest(bamboo)-grass compound vegetation in initial of conversion cropland to forest. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 95: 126-130+140.

19. Chen Y, An SS, Li BH, Li DH (2010) Soil nutrient and microbial biomass in the Loess hilly area of Ningxia under different plant rehabilitation patterns. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 18: 261-266.

20. Chen YR (1995) Research on soil Fertility changes in artificial forest of different types. Natural and Resource: 46-51.

21. Cui J, Chen YM, Huang JJ, Wang QF, Yao ZJ, Zhang F (2012) Soil carbon sequestration characteristics of Caragana microphylla plantations and influencing factors in Loess Hilly Semiarid Region. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 20: 1197-1203.

22. Cunningham S, Metzeling K, Mac Nally R, Thomson J, Cavagnaro T (2012) Changes in soil carbon of pastures after afforestation with mixed species: sampling, heterogeneity and surrogates. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 158: 58-65.

23. Dai QH, Liu GB, Jiang J, Xue J, Zhai S (2008) Efect of soil enzyme activities under different vegetation restoration in eroded hilly Loess Plateau. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin No.171: 429-434.

24. Davis MR, Lang MH (1991) Increased nutrient availability in topsoils under conifers in the South Island high country. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 21: 165-179.

25. Davis M (1998) Soil impacts of afforestation in the high country. New Zealand Forestry 42: 34-38.

26. Davis M (2001) Soil properties under pine forest and pasture at two hill country sites in Canterbury. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 31: 3-17.

27. DeGryze S, Six J, Paustian K, Morris SJ, Paul EA, Merckx R (2004) Soil organic carbon pool changes following land ‐use conversions. Global Change Biology 10: 1120-1132.

28. Del Galdo I, Six J, Peressotti A, Francesca Cotrufo M (2003) Assessing the impact of land‐use change on soil C sequestration in agricultural soils by means of organic matter fractionation and stable C isotopes. Global Change Biology 9: 1204-1213.

Page 23: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

29. Ding WG, Wei YL, Niu HW (2010) Impact of vegetation regeneration on soil nutrient variation in central arid region of Gansu province. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 19: 2568-2573.

30. Dong LL, Zheng FL (2008) Characteristics of soil enzyme activities and nutrients under various landuse in the Loessial hilly-gully region. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 17: 2050-2058.

31. Dong LN, Luo WL, Han FP, Zhang XC (2008) Influence of the vegetation restoration process on nutrient in zhifanggou watershed. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences: 6407-6409.

32. Eclesia RP, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB, Biganzoli F, Pineiro G (2012) Shifts in soil organic carbon for plantation and pasture establishment in native forests and grasslands of South America. Global Change Biology 18: 3237-3251. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02761.x.

33. Engda TA, Kassahun HT, Collick AS, Adissu T, Ashagrie BB, Tessema ZK, Derebe A, Solomon D, Steenhus TS Soil properties and fertility status dynamics of north western Ethiopia as Influenced by Land Use Changes: Case of Dibanke Watershed.

34. Farley KA, Kelly EF (2004) Effects of afforestation of a páramo grassland on soil nutrient status. Forest Ecology and Management 195: 281-290.

35. Garbin ML, Zandavalli RB, Dillenburg LR (2006) Soil patches of inorganic nitrogen in subtropical Brazilian plant communities with Araucaria angustifolia. Plant and Soil 286: 323-337.

36. Giddens KM, Parfitt RL, Percival HJ (1997) Comparison of some soil properties under Pinus radiataand improved pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 40: 409-416. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1997.9513262.

37. Girmay G, Singh B (2012) Changes in soil organic carbon stocks and soil quality: land-use system effects in northern Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science 62: 519-530.

38. Gong J, Chen L, Fu B, Huang Y, Huang Z, Peng H (2006) Effect of land use on soil nutrients in the loess hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China. Land Degradation & Development 17: 453-465. doi: 10.1002/ldr.701.

39. Grigal, D.F. & Berguson, W.E. (1998) Soil carbon changes associated with short-rotation systems. Biomass and Bioenergy, 14, 371-377.

Page 24: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

40. Groenendijk F, Condron L, Rijkse W (2002) Effects of afforestation on organic carbon, nitrogen and sulfur concentrations in New Zealand hill country soils. Geoderma 108: 91-100.

41. Guo LB, Wang M, Gifford RM (2007) The change of soil carbon stocks and fine root dynamics after land use change from a native pasture to a pine plantation. Plant and Soil 299: 251-262. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9381-7.

42. Han XH, Yang GH, Tong XG, Feng YZ, Ren GX, Zhao FZ, Du YH (2012) Soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration under several different forest lands converted by farmland in Loess Hilly Area. Journal of Agro-Environment Science v.31;No.122: 1172-1179.

43. Hosner, J.F. & Graney, D.L. (1970) The relative growth of three forest tree species on soils associated with different successional stages in Virginia. American Midland Naturalist, 418-427.

44. Hu JB, Yang GH, Zhang XP, Feng YZ (2007) Effects of various vegetative restoration patterns on soil fertility. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences No.386: 69-72.

45. Hu YL, Zeng DH, Jiang T (2009) Effects of afforested poplar plantations on the stock and distribution of C,N,P at Keerqin Sandy Lands(in Chinese). Acta Ecological Sinica: 4206-4214.

46. Huygens D, Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O, Oyarzun C, Godoy R (2005) Aggregate and soil organic carbon dynamics in South Chilean Andisols. Biogeosciences 2: 159-174.

47. Ji RR, Zhang Q, Yang Z, Zhang JJ, Wang L (2007) Soil Fertility Characteristics Induced by Caragana microphylla Plantation at Different Growing Stage on Loess Plateau in North-west of Shanxi Province. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences: 51-54.

48. Jia GM (2006) The Effects of Vegetation Succession and Land Management on soil nutrient, activity and structure of microbial community in the Loess Plateau of Northwest China. Lanzhou University, Lanzhou. Doctoral degree desertation.

49. Jia TH, Liu SM, Zhang GC (1994) The ecological effectiveness of forest using to water and soil conversation in west Liaoning. Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science & Technology: 26-29+19.

50. Jia TH, Yang LH (1994) The daption of Hippophae rhamnoides in different soil types in west Liaoning. Journal of Liaoning Forestry

Page 25: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

Science & Technology: 46-48.

51. Jiang JP (2007) Co-variation of vegetation and soil quality during ecosystem restoration in the hilly region of the semiarid Loess Plateau. Lanzhou University, Lanzhou. Doctoral degree desertation.

52. Jiang PK, Xu QF, Zhou GM, Wu JS, Qian XB (2007) Abundance of Soil nutrients and labile organic carbon responsive to afforestation on abandoned limestone Hill. Scientia Silvae Sinicae: 39-42.

53. Jiang PK, Zhou GM (2003) Changes in soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen under eroded red soil by vegetation recovery. Journal of Soil Water Conservation: 112-114+127.

54. Jiao JY, Jiao F, Wen ZM (2006) Soil water and nutrients of vegetation communities under different restoration types on the hilly-gullied Loess Plateau. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science: 667-674.

55. Jug A, Makeschin F, Rehfuess K, Hofmann-Schielle C (1999) Short-rotation plantations of balsam poplars, aspen and willows on former arable land in the Federal Republic of Germany. III. Soil ecological effects. Forest Ecology and Management 121: 85-99.

56. Kahle P, Hildebrand E, Baum C, Boelcke B (2007) Long-term effects of short rotation forestry with willows and poplar on soil properties. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 53: 673-682. doi: 10.1080/03650340701648484.

57. Kang M, Feng L, Sun BP, Wang TS (2012) Research on sloping cropland soil improvement effects after returning farmland to forest in hechuan district of chongqing. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 28: 89-94.

58. Karhu K, Wall A, Vanhala P, Liski J, Esala M, Regina K (2011) Effects of afforestation and deforestation on boreal soil carbon stocks—comparison of measured C stocks with Yasso07 model results. Geoderma 164: 33-45.

59. Kasel S, Bennett LT (2007) Land-use history, forest conversion, and soil organic carbon in pine plantations and native forests of south eastern Australia. Geoderma 137: 401-413.

60. Kooch Y, Hosseini SM, Zaccone C, Jalilvand H, Hojjati SM (2012) Soil organic carbon sequestration as affected by afforestation: the Darab Kola forest (north of Iran) case study. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 14: 2438-2446.

Page 26: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

61. Lemenih M, Gidyelew T, Teketay D (2004) Effects of canopy cover and understory environment of tree plantations on richness, density and size of colonizing woody species in southern Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management 194: 1-10.

62. Lemma B, Kleja DB, Nilsson I, Olsson M (2006) Soil carbon sequestration under different exotic tree species in the southwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Geoderma 136: 886-898.

63. Li K, Zhang SC, Ma J, M., Zheng ZX (2006) Comparative Research on soil fertility of different artificial plantations in yuanmou dry-iot valley,Yunnan Province. Forest Research: 574-579.

64. Li SM (1999) Effects of planting acacia confusa forest for water and soilconservation on the soil structure and nutrient. Journal Of Fujian Forestry Science And Technology: 35-37.

65. Li YL, Peng SL, Zhao P, Ren H, Li ZA (2002) A study on the soil carbon storage of some land use types in heshan, Guangdong, China. Journal of Mountain Research: 548-552.

66. Liang HW, Huang CB, Hu CB (1993) A study on the litterfall and soil fertility of the different planted forests in Guangxi. Acta Ecological Sinica: 235-242.

67. Lima AM, Silva IR, Neves JC, Novais RF, Barros NF, Mendonça ES, Smyth TJ, Moreira MS, Leite FP (2006) Soil organic carbon dynamics following afforestation of degraded pastures with eucalyptus in southeastern Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 235: 219-231.

68. Liu C, Ren YL, He JS (2009) Soil dissolved organic carbon decreased following 40-year grassland afforestation. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis 45: 511-518.

69. Liu YX, Hu YL, Zeng DH, Fan ZP, Zhao Q (2010) Effects of grassland afforestation with Mongolian pine on soil chemical and biological properties in Keerqin Sandy Land. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 21: 814-820.

70. Lu CH, Zheng FL (2009) Evuluation of soil quality change after revegetation in Ziluling on the Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of water and soil convervation: 12-18+29.

71. Lu CH, Zheng FL, An SS (2009) The characteristics of soil enzyme activities and nutrients during vegetation succession. Agricultural

Page 27: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

Research in the Arid Areas: 227-232.

72. Luo HB, Qian XG, Liu F, He TB, Song GY (2003) Ecological benefit of soil and water conservation in hilly areas by de farming and reafforestation. Journal of Soil Water Conservation: 31-34+41.

73. Ma XX, Gong W, Hu TX, Wang JY, Li XP, Shi W (2010) Impacts of slope cropland rebuilding on soil labile organic matter and carbon management index in the eroded Hilly Loess Plateau. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 28: 56-60.

74. Mao R, Cui Q, Zhao Q, Ai GY, Li LJ, Zeng DH (2009) Soil microbial biomass and activity in relation to stand age of poplar shelterbelts. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 20: 2079-2084.

75. Mao R, Zeng DH (2010) Changes in soil particulate organic matter, microbial biomass, and activity following afforestation of marginal agricultural lands in a semi-Arid Area of Northeast China. Environmental Management 46: 110-116.

76. Maquere V, Laclau JP, Bernoux M, Saint-Andre L, Goncalves JLM, Cerri CC, Piccolo MC, Ranger J (2008) Influence of land use (savanna, pasture, Eucalyptus plantations) on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in Brazil. European Journal of Soil Science 59: 863-877. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01059.x.

77. Marchao RL, Becquer T, Brunet D, Balbino LC, Vilela L, Brossard M (2009) Carbon and nitrogen stocks in a Brazilian clayey Oxisol: 13-year effects of integrated crop-livestock management systems. Soil & Tillage Research 103: 442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.11.002.

78. Marin‐Spiotta e, Silver WL, Swanston CW, Ostertag R (2009) Soil organic matter dynamics during 80 years of reforestation of tropical pastures. Global Change Biology 15: 1584-1597.

79. Markewitz D, Sartori F, Craft C (2002) Soil change and carbon storage in longleaf pine stands planted on marginal agricultural lands. Ecological Applications 12: 1276-1285.

80. Martens DA, Reedy TE, Lewis DT (2004) Soil organic carbon content and composition of 130‐year crop, pasture and forest land‐use managements. Global Change Biology 10: 65-78.

81. Mellor N, Hellerich J, Drijber R, Morris S, Stromberger M, Paul E (2013) Changes in ecosystem carbon following afforestation of native

Page 28: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

sand prairie. Soil Science Society of America Journal 77: 1613-1624.

82. Mendez-Millan M, Tu TN, Balesdent J, Derenne S, Derrien D, Egasse C, M’Bou AT, Zeller B, Hatté C (2014) Compound-specific 13C and 14C measurements improve the understanding of soil organic matter dynamics. Biogeochemistry 118: 205-223.

83. Mendham D, Mathers N, O'Connell A, Grove T, Saffigna PG (2002) Impact of land-use on soil organic matter quality in south-western Australia—characterization with 13 C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34: 1669-1673.

84. Menyailo OV, Hungate BA, Zech W (2002) Tree species mediated soil chemical changes in a Siberian artificial afforestation experiment. Plant and Soil 242: 171-182.

85. McKinley, D.C. & Blair, J.M. (2008) Woody plant encroachment by Juniperus virginiana in a mesic native grassland promotes rapid carbon and nitrogen accrual. Ecosystems, 11, 454-468.

86. Mishra A, Sharma S, Gupta M (2003) Soil rehabilitation through afforestation: evaluation of the performance of Prosopis juliflora, Dalbergia sissoo and Eucalyptus tereticornis plantations in a sodic environment. Arid Land Research and Management 17: 257-269.

87. Mobley ML, Lajtha K, Kramer MG, Bacon AR, Heine PR, Richter DD (2015) Surficial gains and subsoil losses of soil carbon and nitrogen during secondary forest development. Global Change Biology.21, 986-996.

88. Morris SJ, Bohm S, Haile‐Mariam S, Paul EA (2007) Evaluation of carbon accrual in afforested agricultural soils. Global Change Biology 13: 1145-1156.

89. Nair, V.D., Haile, S.G., Michel, G.A. & Nair, P.K.R. (2007) Environmental quality improvement of agricultural lands through silvopasture in southeastern United States. Scientia Agricola, 64, 513-519.

90. Niu WX, Zhang Q, Yang ZP, Chen B, Shi QL (2003) Research on change of soil properities of Caragana plantation in North-west of Shanxi Province. Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica: 628-632.

91. Novara A, Gristina L, Mantia TL, Rühl J (2011) Soil carbon dynamics during secondary succession in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Biogeosciences Discussions 8: 11107-11138.

Page 29: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

92. Parfitt R, Percival H, Dahlgren R, Hill L (1997) Soil and solution chemistry under pasture and radiata pine in New Zealand. Plant and Soil 191: 279-290.

93. Pinno BD, Bélanger N (2008) Ecosystem carbon gains from afforestation in the Boreal Transition ecozone of Saskatchewan (Canada) are coupled with the devolution of Black Chernozems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 123: 56-62.

94. Poulton P, Pye E, Hargreaves P, Jenkinson D (2003) Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen by old arable land reverting to woodland. Global Change Biology 9: 942-955.

95. Poultouchidou A (2012) Effects of forest plantations on soil carbon sequestration and farmers’ livelihoods: a case study in Ethiopia.Second cycle, A2E. Uppsala: SLU, Dept. of Soil and Environment

96. Ren W (2010) Changes of soil characteristics during typical vegetation restoration in karst mountain Area. Southwest University. Master degree desertation.

97. Ren W, Xie SY, Xie DT, Feng HF (2010) Changes of soil physicochemical and microbial features during the typical vegetation restoration in karst mountain. Carsologica Sinica 29: 35-40.

98. Resh SC, Binkley D, Parrotta JA (2002) Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen-fixing trees compared with species. Ecosystems 5: 0217-0231. doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0067-3.

99. Rhoades CC, Eckert GE, Coleman DC (2000) Soil carbon differences among forest, agriculture, and secondary vegetation in lower montane Ecuador. Ecological Applications 10: 497-505.

100. Richter DD, Markewitz D, Trumbore SE, Wells CG (1999) Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400: 56-58.

101. Ritter E (2007) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in volcanic soils following afforestation with native birch (Betula pubescens) and introduced larch (Larix sibirica) in Iceland. Plant and Soil 295: 239-251.

102. Ross D, Tate K, Scott N, Feltham C (1999) Land-use change: effects on soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus pools and fluxes in three

Page 30: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

adjacent ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31: 803-813.

103. Sartori, F., Lal, R., Ebinger, M.H. & Eaton, J.A. (2007) Changes in soil carbon and nutrient pools along a chronosequence of poplar plantations in the Columbia Plateau, Oregon, USA. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 122, 325-339.

104. Sauer TJ, James DE, Cambardella CA, Hernandez-Ramirez G (2012) Soil properties following reforestation or afforestation of marginal cropland. Plant and Soil 360: 375-390.

105. Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agroforestry Systems 60: 123-130. doi: 10.1023/b:agfo.0000013267.87896.41.

106. Shen BG (2002) Study on Soil Fertility in Quercus Vqriabilis Plantation with Thirty-five Years. Journal Of Fujian forestry colleage: 154-156.

107. Shen H, Jiang FQ (1998) Effect of water and soil conservation forest on soil improvement in western Liaoning Province. Journal of Appied ecology: 1-6.

108. Shen YX, Zhang YD, Liu WY (2002) Plant rehabilitation on degraded land at debris-prone dry valley. Journal of Mountain Research: 188-193.

109. Shi S, Han P, Zhang P, Ding F (2015) The impact of afforestation on soil organic carbon sequestration on the Qinghai Plateau, China. PLoS One 10: e0116591.

110.Song NP, Yang GX, He XZ, He TH, Li Y, Liu XY (2012) Soil nutrient effect of desert steppe reconstructed by artificial caragana microphylla stand. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 32: 21-26.

111.Sparling GP, Shepherd TG, Schipper LA (2000) Topsoil characteristics of three contrasting New Zealand soils under four long‐term land uses. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43: 569-583.

112.Springsteen, A., Loya, W., Liebig, M. & Hendrickson, J. (2010) Soil carbon and nitrogen across a chronosequence of woody plant expansion in North Dakota. Plant And Soil, 328, 369-379.

Page 31: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

113.Srivastava P, Sharma YK, Singh N (2014) Soil carbon sequestration potential of Jatropha curcas L. growing in varying soil conditions. Ecological Engineering 68: 155-166.

114.Su ZY, Wu WL, Zhang JS, Jiang GH, Jia CR, Li JX, Li ZF (2007) Nutrient loss of different slopeland-use types in xiaolangdi gorges reservoir Area. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation 158: 27-31.

115.Wang C, Wang XA, Wang L (2007) Plant species diversity of different age Pinus tabulaeformis plantations and its relations with soil fertility. Chinese Journal of Ecology 169: 1182-1186.

116.Wang LB (2007) Ecology research of two rangeland plantation in Duolun Country. Inner Mongolia University. Master degree desertation.

117.Wang Y, Ruan HH, Huang LL, Feng YQ, Qi Y (2010) Soil labile organic carbon of different land use types in a reclaimed land area of Taihu Lake. Chinese Journal of Ecology 29: 741-748.

118.Wei B (2009) Microbial Biomass and Nutrients in Soil at the Different Stages of Secondary Forest Succession in Southeast of Hubei Province. Beijing Forestry University, Beijing. Master degree desertation.

119.Wei X, Shao M, Fu X, Horton R, Li Y, Zhang X (2009a) Distribution of soil organic C, N and P in three adjacent land use patterns in the northern Loess Plateau, China. Biogeochemistry 96: 149-162.

120. Wei YC, Ouyang ZY, Miao H, Zheng H (2009) Exotic Pinus carbaea causes soil quality to deteriorate on former abandoned land compared to an indigenous Podocarpus plantation in the tropical forest area of southern China. Journal of forest research 14: 221-228.

121. Wellock M (2011) The Impact of Afforestation on the Carbon Stocks of Irish Soils. National University of Ireland. Doctoral degree desertation.

122. Wu J, Liu Z, Sun Y, Zhou L, Lin Y, Fu S (2013) Introduced Eucalyptus urophylla plantations change the composition of the soil microbial community in subtropical China. Land Degradation & Development 24: 400-406.

123. Xue S, Liu G, Dai JH, Dang X, Zhou P (2007) Effect of differ ent vegetation restor ation models on soil microbial biomass in eroded hilly Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources 22: 20-27.

Page 32: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

124. Yan D (2008) Study on Soil Physical and Chemical properties and soil enzyme dynamics of four de-farming and reafforestation patterns in high precipitation area of western China. Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan. Master degree desertation.

125. Yan DR, Wang JY (1996) The soil fertility dynamics of larch plantation in Inner Mongolia. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science & Technology: 99-102.

126. Yang D (2005) Changes in Soil physical and chemical properties of Coastal protective forest in north Jiangsu Province. Ningjing Forestry University, Nanjing. Master degree desertation.

127. Yang J, Huang J, Pan Q, Tang J, Han X (2004) Long-term impacts of land-use change on dynamics of tropical soil carbon and nitrogen pools. Journal of Environmental Sciences-Beijing 16: 256-261.

128. Yu MH, Sun BP (2012) Environmental effect of returning farmland to forest and its ecological value estimation in Pingguo County,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis 24: 114-119.

129. Yuan HW, Su YR, Zheng H, Huang DY, Wu JS (2007) Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in peak-cluster depression landuse of karst region. Chinese Journal of Ecology.171: 1579-1584.

130. Yüksek T (2012) The restoration effects of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L) plantation on surface soil properties and carbon sequestration on lower hillslopes in the semi-humid region of Coruh Drainage Basin in Turkey. Catena 90: 18-25.

131. Yun C (2010) Effect of different age popar plantations on the micro-environment of the soil. Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou. Master degree desertation.

132. Zhang J, Chang QR (2006) Effects on soil fertility in different types of forest on loess plateau. Bulletin of Soil And Water Conservation 26: 26-28,62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-288X.2006.03.007.

133. Zhang JA, Zhang XC, Qiu LP, Cong W, Yan F, Xue XH (2007) Dynamics of soil quality in a loess hilly area grown with Caragana Korshinskii. Journal of Agro-Environment Science: 136-140.

134. Zhang JB, Zhao YH, Xu LF, Tang YL, Hu YL, Hu ZD, Si HZ (1997) Study of economic effectiveness and ecological effectiveness of

Page 33: static-content.springer.com10.1007... · Web view(Sharrow and Ismail 2004) 158 US South Carolina Union 16 1170 CF G 6,15,20,28,35,43 pH, SOC, TN,C:N, (Mobley et al. 2015; Richter

mixed popar Protection Forest Science And Technology: 16-19+41.

135. Zhang XL, Li JJ, Shi FC (2008) Organic carbon and nitrogen contents and microbial biomass in soils under rapid-growth poplar plantation. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment 95: 32-35.

136. Zheng JB, Wang ZF, Zhou CR, Tan YJ, Li BC, Gao M (2008) Effect of land use change on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in soil profiles located in Purple Hilly Areas. Ecology and Environmental Sciences 17: 2041-2045.

137. Zheng SA, Chang QR (2006) The influence of different plantations on the soil fertility on Loess Plateau. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry (Natural Science Edition): 119-123.

138. Zinn YL, Resck DV, da Silva JE (2002) Soil organic carbon as affected by afforestation with Eucalyptus and Pinus in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 166: 285-294.

139. Zou X, Bashkin M (1998) Soil carbon accretion and earthworm recovery following revegetation in abandoned sugarcane fields. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 825-830.