12
Title: “Family Structure on Aggression of High School Students” STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 1. What is the profile variables of the respondents when grouped according to: 1.1 Age AGE1 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 11-12 210 24.62 24.62 24.62 13-14 406 47.60 47.60 72.22 15-16 230 26.96 26.96 99.18 17 and above 7 .82 .82 100.00 Total 853 100.00 100.00 1.2 Gender gender Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid male 406 47.60 47.60 47.60 female 447 52.40 52.40 100.00 Total 853 100.00 100.00 1.3 Family Structure family_structure Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Both Parents 697 81.71 81.71 81.71 Solo Parent 156 18.29 18.29 100.00 Total 853 100.00 100.00

Statement of the Problem (2)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

psychology

Citation preview

Page 1: Statement of the Problem (2)

Title: “Family Structure on Aggression of High School Students”

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

1. What is the profile variables of the respondents when grouped according to:1.1 Age

AGE1

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid 11-12 210 24.62 24.62 24.62

13-14 406 47.60 47.60 72.22

15-16 230 26.96 26.96 99.18

17 and above 7 .82 .82 100.00

Total 853 100.00 100.00

1.2 Gender

gender

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid male 406 47.60 47.60 47.60

female 447 52.40 52.40 100.00

Total 853 100.00 100.00

1.3 Family Structure

family_structure

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Both Parents 697 81.71 81.71 81.71

Solo Parent 156 18.29 18.29 100.00

Total 853 100.00 100.00

Page 2: Statement of the Problem (2)

2. What type of aggression do the respondents manifest? SAME AS 4PHYSICAL AGGRESSIONVERBAL AGGRESSIONANGERHOSTILITY

3. Is there a significant difference on the type of aggression of the respondents when grouped according to profile variables?3.1 Age

Variables Df Chi-square value Probability value Decision at 0.05Physical aggression

6 17.193 0.009 Reject Ho

Verbal aggression

6 10.971 0.089 Accept Ho

Anger 6 26.982 0.000 Reject HoHostility 6 16.295 0.012 Reject Ho

3.2 Gender

Variables Df Chi-square value Probability value Decision at 0.05Physical aggression

2 3.670 0.160 Accept Ho

Verbal aggression

2 3.341 0.188 Accept Ho

Anger 2 13.298 0.001 Reject HoHostility 2 7.035 0.030 Reject Ho

3.3 Family Structure

Variables Df Chi-square value Probability value Decision at 0.05Physical aggression

2 0.759 0.684 Accept Ho

Verbal aggression

2 4.562 0.102 Accept Ho

Anger 2 0.100 0.951 Accept HoHostility 2 2.330 0.312 Accept Ho

Page 3: Statement of the Problem (2)

4. What is the aggression level of the respondents?4.1 Age

Crosstab

physical_agression

Totalhigh moderate Low

AGE1 11-12 Count 6 142 62 210

% within physical_agression 10.17% 24.40% 29.25% 24.62%

13-14 Count 28 272 106 406

% within physical_agression 47.46% 46.74% 50.00% 47.60%

15-16 Count 25 163 42 230

% within physical_agression 42.37% 28.01% 19.81% 26.96%

17 and above Count 0 5 2 7

% within physical_agression .00% .86% .94% .82%

Total Count 59 582 212 853

% within physical_agression 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Crosstab

verbal_agression

Totalhigh moderate Low

AGE1 11-12 Count 53 109 48 210

% within verbal_agression 19.85% 24.94% 32.21% 24.62%

13-14 Count 137 208 61 406

% within verbal_agression 51.31% 47.60% 40.94% 47.60%

15-16 Count 73 117 40 230

% within verbal_agression 27.34% 26.77% 26.85% 26.96%

17 and above Count 4 3 0 7

% within verbal_agression 1.50% .69% .00% .82%

Total Count 267 437 149 853

% within verbal_agression 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Crosstab

anger Total

Page 4: Statement of the Problem (2)

high moderate low

AGE1 11-12 Count 19 114 77 210

% within anger 19.39% 20.58% 38.31% 24.62%

13-14 Count 48 278 80 406

% within anger 48.98% 50.18% 39.80% 47.60%

15-16 Count 30 157 43 230

% within anger 30.61% 28.34% 21.39% 26.96%

17 and above Count 1 5 1 7

% within anger 1.02% .90% .50% .82%

Total Count 98 554 201 853

% within anger 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Crosstab

hostility

Totalhigh moderate low

AGE1 11-12 Count 25 134 51 210

% within hostility 15.92% 25.38% 30.36% 24.62%

13-14 Count 94 239 73 406

% within hostility 59.87% 45.27% 43.45% 47.60%

15-16 Count 36 152 42 230

% within hostility 22.93% 28.79% 25.00% 26.96%

17 and above Count 2 3 2 7

% within hostility 1.27% .57% 1.19% .82%

Total Count 157 528 168 853

% within hostility 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

4.2 Gender

Page 5: Statement of the Problem (2)

Crosstab

physical_agression

Totalhigh moderate Low

Gender male Count 33 282 91 406

% within physical_agression 55.93% 48.45% 42.92% 47.60%

female Count 26 300 121 447

% within physical_agression 44.07% 51.55% 57.08% 52.40%

Total Count 59 582 212 853

% within physical_agression 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Crosstab

verbal_agression

Totalhigh moderate Low

Gender male Count 116 212 78 406

% within verbal_agression 43.45% 48.51% 52.35% 47.60%

female Count 151 225 71 447

% within verbal_agression 56.55% 51.49% 47.65% 52.40%

Total Count 267 437 149 853

% within verbal_agression 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Crosstab

anger

Totalhigh moderate low

Gender male Count 38 251 117 406

% within anger 38.78% 45.31% 58.21% 47.60%

female Count 60 303 84 447

% within anger 61.22% 54.69% 41.79% 52.40%

Total Count 98 554 201 853

% within anger 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Page 6: Statement of the Problem (2)

Crosstab

hostility

Totalhigh moderate low

Gender male Count 64 249 93 406

% within hostility 40.76% 47.16% 55.36% 47.60%

female Count 93 279 75 447

% within hostility 59.24% 52.84% 44.64% 52.40%

Total Count 157 528 168 853

% within hostility 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

4.3 Family Structure

Crosstab

physical_agression

Totalhigh Moderate low

family_structure Both Parents Count 49 471 177 697

% within physical_agression 83.05% 80.93% 83.49% 81.71%

Solo Parent Count 10 111 35 156

% within physical_agression 16.95% 19.07% 16.51% 18.29%

Total Count 59 582 212 853

% within physical_agression 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Crosstab

verbal_agression

Totalhigh Moderate low

family_structure Both Parents Count 207 365 125 697

% within verbal_agression 77.53% 83.52% 83.89% 81.71%

Solo Parent Count 60 72 24 156

% within verbal_agression 22.47% 16.48% 16.11% 18.29%

Total Count 267 437 149 853

% within verbal_agression 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Page 7: Statement of the Problem (2)

Crosstab

Anger

Totalhigh moderate Low

family_structure Both Parents Count 79 453 165 697

% within anger 80.61% 81.77% 82.09% 81.71%

Solo Parent Count 19 101 36 156

% within anger 19.39% 18.23% 17.91% 18.29%

Total Count 98 554 201 853

% within anger 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

Crosstab

Hostility

Totalhigh moderate low

family_structure Both Parents Count 128 425 144 697

% within hostility 81.53% 80.49% 85.71% 81.71%

Solo Parent Count 29 103 24 156

% within hostility 18.47% 19.51% 14.29% 18.29%

Total Count 157 528 168 853

% within hostility 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

5. Is there a significant difference of the aggression level of the respondents when grouped according to profile variables SAME WITH 3

6. Is there a significant relationship between family structure and aggression of the respondents? SAME WITH 3.3

Page 8: Statement of the Problem (2)

physical_agression

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid high 59 6.92 6.92 6.92

moderate 582 68.23 68.23 75.15

low 212 24.85 24.85 100.00

Total 853 100.00 100.00

verbal_agression

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid high 267 31.30 31.30 31.30

moderate 437 51.23 51.23 82.53

low 149 17.47 17.47 100.00

Total 853 100.00 100.00

anger

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid high 98 11.49 11.49 11.49

moderate 554 64.95 64.95 76.44

low 201 23.56 23.56 100.00

Total 853 100.00 100.00

hostility

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid high 157 18.41 18.41 18.41

moderate 528 61.90 61.90 80.30

low 168 19.70 19.70 100.00

Total 853 100.00 100.00