State of Utah · 2017-11-27 · State of Utah . GARY R. HERBERT Arnold W. Reitze Jr ... state or federal law. 35 (b) At such time that a particular source or modification becomes

State of Utah

GARY R. HERBERT Governor

SPENCER J. COX Lieutenant Governor

Department of Environmental Quality

Alan Matheson Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Bryce C. Bird

Director

Air Quality Board Michael Smith, Chair

Erin Mendenhall, Vice-Chair Kevin R. Cromar

Mitra Basiri Kashanchi Cassady Kristensen

Randal S. Martin Alan Matheson

Arnold W. Reitze Jr William C. Stringer

Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary

DAQ-081-17

UTAH AIR QUALITY BOARD MEETING

DRAFT AGENDA

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 - 1:30 p.m. 195 North 1950 West, Room 1015

Salt Lake City, Utah 84116

I. Call-to-Order

II. Date of the Next Air Quality Board Meeting: January 3, 2018

III. Approval of the Minutes for October 4, 2017, Board Meeting.

IV. Final Adoption: Amend R307-403. Permits: New and Modified Sources in Nonattainment Areas and Maintenance Areas. Presented by Mat Carlile.

V. Propose for Public Comment: Amend R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coatings; R307-353. Plastic Parts Coatings; and R307-355. Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities. Presented by Mat Carlile.

VI. Informational Items.A. PM2.5 State Implementation Plan Update. Presented by Bill Reiss. B.C.D.E.F.

Air Toxics. Presented by Robert Ford. Compliance. Presented by Jay Morris and Harold Burge. Monitoring. Presented by Bo Call. Other Items to be Brought Before the Board. Board Meeting Follow-up Items.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with special needs (including auxiliary communicative aids and services) should contact Larene Wyss, Office of Human Resources at (801) 536-4281, TDD (801) 536-4284 or by email at [email protected].

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, Utah Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820

Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801) 536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 903-3978 www.deq.utah.gov

Printed on 100% recycled paper

ITEM 4

State of Utah


SPENCER J. COX

Lieutenant Governor


Alan Matheson

Executive Director


Director

DAQ-079-17

M E M O R A N D U M TO: Air Quality Board THROUGH: Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary FROM: Sheila Vance, Environmental Scientist DATE: November 9, 2017 SUBJECT: FINAL ADOPTION: Amend R307-403. Permits: New and Modified Sources in

Nonattainment Areas and Maintenance Areas. ______________________________________________________________________________________ On September 6, 2017, the Utah Air Quality Board proposed amendments to R307-403. EPA determined that there are potential deficiencies in Utah’s nonattainment new source review (NNSR) permitting rules. In response to EPA, the Division of Air Quality sent a letter to EPA committing to revise portions of R307-403 no later than December 8, 2017. These amendments fulfill those commitments. A public comment period was held from October 1 to October 31, 2017. No comments were received, and no hearing was requested. However, comments were made at the September 6, 2017, Board meeting that did not get incorporated into the document that was released for public comment. The suggested changes were not substantive in nature. The changes add clarity and do not change the original intent of the rule or how the agency interprets the rule. These clarifications are incorporated into the proposed rule for adoption. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board adopt R307-403 as amended.

195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, Utah

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801) 536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4284

www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 1 of 9 R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 1 R307-403. Permits: New and Modified Sources in Nonattainment Areas and Maintenance 2 Areas. 3 R307-403-1. Purpose and Definitions. 4 (1) Purpose. This rule implements the federal nonattainment area permitting program for 5 major sources as required by 40 CFR 51.165. In addition, the rule contains new source review 6 provisions for some non-major sources in PM10 nonattainment areas. This rule supplements, but 7 does not replace, the permitting requirements of R307-401. 8 (2) Unless otherwise specified, all references to 40 CFR in R307-403 shall mean the version 9 that is in effect July 1, 2017. 10 (3) Except as provided in R307-403-1(4), the definitions in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)are hereby 11 incorporated by reference. The definition of PAL, or plant wide applicability limitation, in 40 CFR 12 51.165(f)(2)(v) is also incorporated by reference. 13 (4)(a) "Reviewing authority" means the director. 14 (b) In the definition of "significant" in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x) add the following text at the 15 end of the pollutant emission rate for PM2.5: "; and in the Logan, Salt Lake City, and Provo PM2.5 16 nonattainment areas as defined in the July 1, 2010 version of 40 CFR 81.345, 40 tpy of volatile 17 organic compounds." 18 (c) In the definition of "regulated NSR pollutant" in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii) the 19 following subparagraph is added to 51.165(a)(1)(xxxvii)(C)(2): "(i) Volatile organic compounds 20 are precursors to PM2.5 and ammonia is not a precursor to PM2.5 in the Logan, Salt Lake City, and 21 Provo PM2.5 nonattainment areas as defined in the July 1, 2010 version of 40 CFR 81.345." 22 (d) The following definitions or portions of definitions that apply to the equipment repair 23 and replacement provisions are not incorporated because these provisions were vacated by the DC 24 Circuit Court of Appeals on March 17, 2006: 25 (i) in the definition of "major modification" in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(C), the second 26 sentence in subparagraph (1); 27 (ii) the definition of "process unit" in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xliii); 28 (iii) the definition of "functionally equivalent component" in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xliv); 29 (iv) the definition of "fixed capital cost" in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xlv); and 30 (v) the definition of "total capital investment" in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xlvi). 31 32 R307-403-2. Applicability. 33 (1) R307-403 applies to any new major stationary source or major modification that is major 34 for the pollutant or precursor pollutant for which the area is designated nonattainment under section 35 107(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Clean Air Act, if the stationary source or modification would locate anywhere 36 in the designated nonattainment area. 37 (a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph R307-403-2(2), and consistent with the 38 definition of major modification contained in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(A), a project is a major 39 modification for a regulated NSR pollutant if it causes two types of emissions increases-a significant 40 emissions increase (as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxvii)), and a significant net emissions 41 increase (as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(vi) and (x)). The project is not a major modification if it 42 does not cause a significant emissions increase. If the project causes a significant emissions 43 increase, then the project is a major modification only if it also results in a significant net emissions 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 2 of 9 increase. 1 (b) The procedure for calculating (before beginning actual construction) whether a 2 significant emissions increase (i.e., the first step of the process) will occur depends upon the type of 3 emissions units being modified, according to paragraphs R307-403-2(c) through (e). The procedure 4 for calculating (before beginning actual construction) whether a significant net emissions increase 5 will occur at the major stationary source (i.e., the second step of the process) is contained in the 6 definition in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(vi). Regardless of any such preconstruction projections, a major 7 modification results if the project causes a significant emissions increase and a significant net 8 emissions increase. 9 (c) Actual-to-projected-actual applicability test for projects that only involve existing 10 emissions units. A significant emissions increase of a regulated NSR pollutant is projected to occur 11 if the sum of the difference between the projected actual emissions (as defined in 40 CFR 12 51.165(a)(1)(xxviii)) and the baseline actual emissions (as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxv)(A) 13 and (B), as applicable), for each existing emissions unit, equals or exceeds the significant amount for 14 that pollutant (as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)). 15 (d) Actual-to-potential test for projects that only involve construction of a new emissions 16 unit(s). A significant emissions increase of a regulated NSR pollutant is projected to occur if the 17 sum of the difference between the potential to emit (as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iii)) from each 18 new emissions unit following completion of the project and the baseline actual emissions (as defined 19 in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxxv)(C)) of these units before the project equals or exceeds the significant 20 amount for that pollutant (as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)). 21 (e) Reserved. 22 (f) Hybrid test for projects that involve multiple types of emissions units. A significant 23 emissions increase of a regulated NSR pollutant is projected to occur if the sum of the emissions 24 increases for each emissions unit, using the method specified in R307-403-2(1)(c) through (d) as 25 applicable with respect to each emissions unit, for each type of emissions unit equals or exceeds the 26 significant amount for that pollutant (as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)). 27 (2) For any major stationary source for a PAL for a regulated NSR pollutant, the major 28 stationary source shall comply with requirements under R307-403-11. 29 (3) Reserved. 30 (4) Reserved. 31 (5)(a) Approval to construct shall not relieve any owner or operator of the responsibility to 32 comply fully with applicable provision of the state implementation plan and any other requirements 33 under local, state or federal law. 34 (b) At such time that a particular source or modification becomes a major stationary source 35 or major modification solely by virtue of a relaxation in any enforcement limitation which was 36 established after August 7, 1980, on the capacity of the source or modification otherwise to emit a 37 pollutant, such as a restriction on hours of operation, then the requirements of R307-403 shall apply to 38 the source or modification as though construction had not yet commenced on the source or 39 modification; 40 (6) The provisions of R307-403-2(6)(a) through (f) apply to projects at existing emissions 41 units at a major stationary source (other than projects at a source with a PAL) in circumstances where 42 there is a reasonable possibility that a project that is not a part of a major modification may result in a 43 significant emissions increase and the owner or operator elects to use the method specified in 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 3 of 9 paragraphs 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxviii)(B)(1) through (3) for calculating projected actual emissions. 1 (a) Before beginning actual construction of the project, the owner or operator shall 2 document and maintain a record of the following information: 3 (i) A description of the project; 4 (ii) Identification of the emissions unit(s) whose emissions of a regulated NSR pollutant 5 could be affected by the project; and 6 (iii) A description of the applicability test used to determine that the project is not a major 7 modification for any regulated NSR pollutant, including the baseline actual emissions, the projected 8 actual emissions, the amount of emissions excluded under 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxviii)(B)(3) and an 9 explanation for why such amount was excluded, and any netting calculations, if applicable. 10 (b) If the emissions unit is an existing electric utility steam generating unit, before beginning 11 actual construction, the owner or operator shall provide a copy of the information set out in 12 R307-403-2(6)(a) to the reviewing authority. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to require 13 the owner or operator of such a unit to obtain any determination from the reviewing authority before 14 beginning actual construction. 15 (c) The owner or operator shall monitor the emissions of any regulated NSR pollutant that 16 could increase as a result of the project and that is emitted by any emissions units identified in 17 paragraph R307-403-2(6)(a)(ii); and calculate and maintain a record of the annual emissions, in tons 18 per year on a calendar year basis, for a period of 5 years following resumption of regular operations 19 after the change, or for a period of 10 years following resumption of regular operations after the 20 change if the project increases the design capacity or potential to emit of that regulated NSR pollutant 21 at such emissions unit. 22 (d) If the unit is an existing electric utility steam generating unit, the owner or operator shall 23 submit a report to the reviewing authority within 60 days after the end of each year during which 24 records must be generated under paragraph R307-403-2(6)(c) setting out the unit's annual emissions 25 during the year that preceded submission of the report. 26 (e) If the unit is an existing unit other than an electric utility steam generating unit, the owner 27 or operator shall submit a report to the reviewing authority if the annual emissions, in tons per year, 28 from the project identified in paragraph R307-403-2(6)(a), exceed the baseline actual emissions (as 29 documented and maintained pursuant to paragraph R307-403-2(6)(c), by a significant amount (as 30 defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)) for that regulated NSR pollutant, and if such emissions differ 31 from the preconstruction projection as documented and maintained pursuant to paragraph 32 R307-403-2(6) (c). Such report shall be submitted to the reviewing authority within 60 days after 33 the end of such year. The report shall contain the following: 34 (i) The name, address and telephone number of the major stationary source; 35 (ii) The annual emissions as calculated pursuant to paragraph R307-403-2(6)(c); and 36 (iii) Any other information that the owner or operator wishes to include in the report (e.g., an 37 explanation as to why the emissions differ from the preconstruction projection). 38 (f) A "reasonable possibility" under (R307-403-2(6) occurs when the owner or operator 39 calculates the project to result in either: 40 (i) A projected actual emissions increase of at least 50 percent of the amount that is a 41 "significant emissions increase," as defined in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxvii)(without reference to the 42 amount that is a significant net emissions increase), for the regulated NSR pollutant; or 43 (ii) A projected actual emissions increase that, added to the amount of emissions excluded 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 4 of 9 under 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxviii)(B)(3), sums to at least 50 percent of the amount that is a 1 "significant emissions increase," as defined under paragraph 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(xxvii) without 2 reference to the amount that is a significant net emissions increase), for the regulated NSR pollutant. 3 For a project for which a reasonable possibility occurs only within the meaning of this paragraph, and 4 not also within the meaning of paragraph R307-403-2(6)(f)(i), then provisions R307-403-2(6)(b) 5 through (e) do not apply to the project. 6 (7) The owner or operator of the source shall make the information required to be 7 documented and maintained pursuant to paragraph R307-403-2(6) above available for review upon a 8 request for inspection by the director or the general public pursuant to the requirements contained in 9 40 CFR 70.4(b)(3)(viii). 10 (8) The requirements of R307-403 applicable to major stationary sources and major 11 modifications of volatile organic compounds shall apply to nitrogen oxides emissions from major 12 stationary sources and major modifications of nitrogen oxides in an ozone transport region or in any 13 ozone nonattainment area, except in ozone nonattainment areas or in portions of an ozone transport 14 region where the EPA Administrator has granted a nitrogen oxides waiver applying the standards set 15 forth under section 182(f) of the Clean Air Act and the waiver continues to apply. 16 (9) Reserved. 17 (10) The requirements of R307-403 apply to new major sources and major modifications to 18 existing sources. Such sources or modifications located in or impacting areas of nonattainment for 19 ozone, PM10, or PM2.5 shall also consider each precursor to ozone, PM10, or PM2.5 respectively. 20 Sources or modifications determined to be major for any of these precursors shall, for offsetting 21 requirements, also be regarded as major for that pollutant for which the area is designated 22 nonattainment. 23 (a) In areas of ozone nonattainment, a new stationary source that is major for nitrogen 24 oxides or for volatile organic compounds shall be considered major for ozone. Similarly, 25 a major modification to an existing source that is major for nitrogen oxides or for volatile organic 26 compounds shall be considered major for ozone. 27 (b) In areas of PM10 nonattainment, a new stationary source that is major for nitrogen 28 oxides or for sulfur dioxide shall trigger offset requirements for PM10. Similarly, 29 a major modification to an existing source that is major for nitrogen oxides or for sulfur dioxide shall 30 trigger offset requirements for PM10. 31 (c) In areas of PM2.5 nonattainment, a new stationary source that is major for nitrogen 32 oxides, sulfur dioxide, or volatile organic compounds shall trigger offset requirements for PM2.5. 33 Similarly, a major modification to an existing source that is major for nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, 34 or volatile organic compounds shall trigger offset requirements for PM2.5. 35 (11) Reserved. 36 (12) R307-403 applies to any major source or major modification that is located outside a 37 nonattainment area and is major for the pollutant for which the area is designated nonattainment 38 under section 107(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Clean Air Act and that causes the significant increments in 39 R307-403-3(1) to be exceeded in the nonattainment area. 40 (13) R307-403-5 applies to any new or modified source in a PM10 or PM2.5 nonattainment 41 area. 42 43 R307-403-3. Review of Major Sources of Air Quality Impact. 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 5 of 9 Every major new source or major modification must be reviewed by the director to determine 1 if a source will cause or contribute to a violation of the NAAQS. 2 (1) If the owner or operator of a source proposes to locate the source outside an area of 3 nonattainment where the source will not cause an increase greater than the following increments in 4 actual areas of nonattainment or in the Salt Lake City and Ogden maintenance areas for carbon 5 monoxide and the source otherwise meets the requirements of these regulations, such source shall be 6 approved. 7 8 TABLE 9 10 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MICROGRAM/CUBIC METER IMPACT 11 BY AVERAGING TIME 12 13 Pollutant Annual 24-Hr 8-Hr 3-Hr 1-Hr 14 SULFUR DIOXIDE 1.0 5 25 15 PM10 1.0 3 16 PM2.5 0.3 1.2 17 NO2 1.0 18 CO 500 2000 19 20 (2) If the director finds that the emissions from a proposed source would cause a new 21 violation of the NAAQS but would not contribute to an existing violation, the director shall approve 22 the proposed source if and only if: 23 (a) the new source is required to meet a more stringent emission limitation, sufficient to 24 avoid a new violation of the NAAQS [and]; 25 (b) the new source has acquired sufficient offset to avoid a new violation of the NAAQS; 26 and 27 (c) the new emission limitations for the proposed source and for any affected existing 28 sources are enforceable. 29 (3) For a proposed new major stationary source or major modification that is major for a 30 pollutant for which an area is designated nonattainment, approval shall be granted if and only if: 31 (a) the new major source or major modification meets an emission limitation which is the 32 Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) for such source for the relevant pollutant(s) in the 33 respective nonattainment area [and]; 34 (b) the applicant has certified that all existing major sources in the State, owned or 35 controlled by the owner or operator (or by any entity controlling, controlled by or under common 36 control with such owner or operator) of the proposed source, are in compliance with all applicable 37 rules in R307, including the Utah Implementation Plan requirements or are in compliance with an 38 approved schedule and timetable for compliance under the Utah Implementation Plan, R307, or an 39 enforcement order, and that the source is complying with all requirements and limitations as 40 expeditiously as practicable[.]; 41 (c) emission offsets to the extent provided in R307-403-4, R307-403-5, and R307-403-6 are 42 sufficient such that there will be reasonable further progress toward attainment of the applicable 43 NAAQS. 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 6 of 9 (d) the emission offsets provide a positive net air quality benefit in the affected area of 1 nonattainment[.]; and 2 (e) there is an approved implementation plan in effect for the pollutant to be emitted by the 3 proposed source. 4 (4) A source which is locating outside a nonattainment area or the Salt Lake City and Ogden 5 maintenance areas for carbon monoxide and which causes the significant increments in 6 R307-403-3(1) to be exceeded in the nonattainment or maintenance area is subject to the 7 requirements of R307-403-3(3)[ ]. 8 9 R307-403-4. Offsets: General Requirements. 10 (1) All general offset permitting requirements apply for all offsets regardless of the 11 pollutant at issue. General offset permitting requirements shall be imposed immediately and directly 12 on all new major stationary sources or major modifications located in a nonattainment area that are 13 major for the pollutant for which the area is designated nonattainment. 14 (2) Emission offsets must be obtained from the same source or other sources in the same 15 nonattainment area except that the owner or operator of a source may obtain emission offsets in 16 another nonattainment area if: 17 (a) the other area has an equal or higher nonattainment classification than the area in which 18 the source is located; and 19 (b) emissions from such other area contribute to a violation of the national ambient air 20 quality standard in the nonattainment area in which the source is located or which is impacted by the 21 source. 22 (3) Any emission offsets required for a new or modified source shall be in effect and 23 enforceable before a new or modified source commences construction. The new or modified source 24 shall assure that the total tonnage of increased emissions of the air pollutant from the new or modified 25 source shall be offset by an equal or greater reduction, as applicable, in the actual emissions of such 26 air pollutant from the same or other sources in the area. 27 (4) Emission reductions otherwise required by the federal Clean Air Act or R307, including 28 the State Implementation Plan shall not be creditable as emission reductions for purposes of any 29 offset requirement. Incidental emission reductions which are not otherwise required by federal or 30 state law shall be creditable as emission reductions if such emission reductions meet the requirements 31 of R307-403-4(2) and R307-403-4(3)[ ]. 32 (5) Sources shall be allowed to offset, by alternative or innovative means, emission 33 increases from rocket engine and motor firing, and cleaning related to such firing, at an existing or 34 modified major source that tests rocket engines or motors under the conditions outlined in 42 U.S.C. 35 7503(e) (Section 173(e)(1) through Section 173(e)(4) of the federal Clean Air Act as amended in 36 1990). 37 38 R307-403-5. Offsets: Particulate Matter Nonattainment Areas. 39 (1) PM10 Nonattainment Areas. New sources which have a potential to emit, or modified 40 sources which would produce an emission increase equal to or exceeding the tonnage total of 41 combined PM10, sulfur dioxide, and oxides of nitrogen listed below which are located in or impact a 42 PM10 Nonattainment Area as defined in R307-403-5(1)(a), shall obtain an enforceable offset as 43 defined in R307-403-5(1)(b) and R307-403-5(1)(c) . 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 7 of 9 (a) For the purpose of determining whether the owner or operator which proposes to locate a 1 source outside a nonattainment area is required to obtain offsets, the maximum allowable impact on 2 any nonattainment area is 1.0 microgram/cubic meter for a one-year averaging period and 3.0 3 micrograms/cubic meter for a 24-hour averaging period for any combination of PM10, sulfur dioxide 4 and nitrogen dioxide. 5 (b) For a total of 50 tons/year or greater, an offset ratio of 1.2:1 of the emission increase is 6 required. 7 (c) For a total of 25 tons/year but less than 50 tons/year, an offset ratio of 1:1 of the emission 8 increase is required. 9 (2) For the offset determinations, PM10, sulfur dioxide, and oxides of nitrogen shall be 10 considered on an equal basis. In areas where offsets are required for PM10, PM2.5 and ozone, the 11 most stringent emission offset ratio for oxides of nitrogen required by R307-403 or R307-420 shall 12 apply. 13 (3) PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas. For the purposes of PM2.5 nonattainment areas a major 14 source is: 15 (a) in a moderate nonattainment area any stationary source of air pollutants which emits 16 or has the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of direct PM2.5, nitrogen oxides, sulfur 17 dioxides or volatile organic compounds. 18 (b) in a serious nonattainment area any stationary source of air pollutants which emits or 19 has the potential to emit 70 tons per year or more of direct PM2.5, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides 20 or volatile organic compounds. 21 (c) any physical change that would occur at a source not qualifying under 22 R307-403-5(3)(a) or R307-403-5(3)(b) as a major source, if the change would constitute a major 23 source by itself. 24 (d) in PM2.5 nonattainment areas, a new stationary source that is major for nitrogen 25 oxides, sulfur dioxide, or volatile organic compounds shall be considered major for PM2.5. 26 Similarly, a major modification to an existing source that is major for nitrogen oxides, sulfur 27 dioxide, or volatile organic compounds shall be considered major for PM2.5. 28 (4) New major sources or major modifications to existing sources which are located in or 29 would impact a PM2.5 Nonattainment shall obtain an enforceable offset as defined in R307-403-5(b) 30 through R307-403-5(d). 31 (a) For the purposes of determining what is a significant emission increase or a significant 32 net emission increase and therefore a major modification, significant means a rate of emissions that 33 would equal or exceed 10 tons per year (tpy) of direct PM2.5, 40 tpy of sulfur dioxide, 40 tpy of 34 nitrogen oxides, or 40 tpy of volatile organic compounds (VOC). 35 (b) For the purpose of determining whether the owner or operator which proposes to locate a 36 source outside a nonattainment area is required to obtain offsets, the maximum allowable impact on 37 any PM2.5 nonattainment area is 0.3 microgram/cubic meter for a one-year averaging period and 1.2 38 micrograms/cubic meter for a 24-hour averaging period for direct PM2.5. 39 (c) Any increase in emissions that has been determined to require offset shall be offset at a 40 ratio of no less than 1:1 rounded up to the next whole number. 41 (d) In areas where offsets may also be required for precursors to PM10 and/or ozone, the 42 most stringent emission offset ratio required by R307-403 shall apply. 43 (e) Offsets may not be traded between pollutants. 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 8 of 9 1 2 R307-403-6. Offsets: Ozone Nonattainment Areas. 3 In any ozone nonattainment area, new sources and modifications to existing sources as 4 defined and outlined in 42 U.S.C. 7511a (Section 182 of the Clean Air Act) shall meet the offset 5 requirements and conditions listed in that section for the applicable classified area and for the 6 identified pollutants. 7 8 R307-403-7. Offsets: Baseline. 9 The baseline to be used for determination of credit for emission and air quality offsets will be 10 the emission limitations and/or other requirements in the State Implementation Plan (SIP), revised in 11 accordance with the Clean Air Act Section 173(c)(1) or subsequent revisions thereto in effect at the 12 time the application to construct or modify a source is filed. The offset baseline shall be the actual 13 emissions, as defined in 401-2, of the source from which offset credits are obtained. 14 15 R307-403-8. Offsets: Banking of Emission Offset Credit. 16 Banking of emission offset credit will be permitted to the fullest extent allowed by applicable 17 Federal Law as identified in EPA's document "Emissions Trading Policy Statement" published in the 18 Federal Register on December 4, 1986, and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(c) as amended on June 28, 1989, 19 and 40 CFR 51, Appendix S. To preserve banked emission reductions, the director must identify 20 them in either the Utah SIP or an order issued pursuant to R307-401 and shall provide a registry to 21 identify the person, private entity or governmental authority that has the right to use or allocate the 22 banked emission reductions, and to record any transfers of, or liens on these rights. 23 24 R307-403-9. Construction in Stages. 25 When a source is constructed or modified in stages which individually do not have the 26 potential to emit more than the significance level for determining a major source, the allowable 27 emission from all such stages shall be added together in determining the applicability of R307-403. 28 29 R307-403-10. Analysis of Alternatives. 30 The owner or operator of a major new source or major modification to be located in a 31 nonattainment area or which would impact a nonattainment area must, in addition to the requirements 32 in R307-403, submit with the notice of intent an adequate analysis of alternative sites, sizes, 33 production processes, and environmental control techniques for such proposed source which 34 demonstrates the benefits of the proposed source significantly outweigh the environmental and social 35 costs imposed as a result of its location, construction, or modification. The director shall review the 36 analysis. The analysis and the director's comments shall be subject to public comment as required by 37 R307-401-7. The preceding shall also apply in Salt Lake and Davis Counties for new major sources 38 or modifications which are considered major for precursors of ozone, including volatile organic 39 compounds and nitrogen oxides. 40 41 R307-403-11. Actuals PALS. 42 The provisions of 40 CFR 51.165(f)(1) through (14) are hereby incorporated by reference. 43 44

R307-403 November 9, 2017 Page 9 of 9 KEY: air quality, nonattainment, offset 1 Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2017 2 Notice of Continuation: May 15, 2017 3 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104; 19-2-108 4

ITEM 5

State of Utah


SPENCER J. COX

Lieutenant Governor


Alan Matheson

Executive Director


Director

DAQ-078-17

M E M O R A N D U M TO: Air Quality Board THROUGH: Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary FROM: Joel Karmazyn, Environmental Scientist DATE: November 8, 2017 SUBJECT: PROPOSE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: Amend R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts and

Products Coatings; R307-353.Plastic Parts Coatings Magnet Wire Coatings; and R307-355. Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities.

______________________________________________________________________________________ The Board directed staff during the October 4, 2017, Board meeting to bring back proposed amendments to R307-350, R307-353, and R307-355. During the meeting, members of the Board expressed concerns with the full exemption granted to medical devices up to 800 pounds of volatile organic compound (VOC) per year granted in both R307-350 and R307-353. The Board asked for language to be brought back that added conditions to the exemption. Also during the meeting, the Board received a request to add an exemption to R307-355 for cleaning of laser hardware, scientific instruments, and high-precision optics. After receiving the comment, the Board asked staff to bring back proposed language to include the exemption in R307-355. Staff has reviewed the Board’s requests and is proposing amendments to the rules as follows: R307-350 Add the following provisions to the exemption in R307-350-3(1)(k): (k) The provisions of R307-350 shall not apply to coating products on medical devices up to 800 pounds of VOC per year[.] if: (i) The source has completed an application to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of the coating meeting the requirements of R307-350; (ii) The source has submitted to DAQ a copy of the application to FDA with a demonstration that it was submitted; and (iii) The source submits to DAQ a quarterly update on the progress of their application to FDA.


Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801) 536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4284


DAQ-078-17 Page 2 R307-353 Add the following provisions to the exemption in R307-353-3(5): (5) The provisions of R307-353 shall not apply to coating products on medical devices [ ]up to 800 pounds of VOC per year[.] if: (i) The source has completed an application to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for approval of the coating meeting the requirements of R307-353; (ii) The source has submitted to DAQ a copy of the application to FDA with a demonstration that it was submitted; and (iii) The source submits to DAQ a quarterly update on the progress of their application to FDA. R307-355 Add an exemption in R307-355-3 for cleaning laser hardware, scientific instruments, and high-precision optics: (i) Cleaning of laser hardware, scientific instruments, and high-precision optics. Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board propose for public comment R307-350, R307-353, and R307-355 as amended.

R307-350 November 8, 2017 Page 1 of 2 R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 1 R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coatings. 2 ***** 3 4 R307-350-3. Exemptions. 5 (1) The requirements of R307-350 do not apply to the following: 6 (a) The surface coating of automobiles subject to R307-354 and 7 light-duty trucks; 8 (b) Flat metal sheets and strips in the form of rolls or coils; 9 (c) Surface coating of aerospace vehicles and components 10 subject to R307-355; 11 (d) The exterior of marine vessels; 12 (e) Customized top coating of automobiles and trucks if 13 production is less than 35 vehicles per day; 14 (f) Military munitions manufactured by or for the Armed Forces 15 of the United States; 16 (g) Operations that are exclusively covered by Department of 17 Defense military technical data and performed by a Department of 18 Defense contractor and/or on site at installations owned and/or 19 operated by the United States Armed Forces; 20 (h) Stripping of cured coatings and adhesives; 21 (i) Canned aerosol coating products; 22 (j) Research and development, quality control, or performance 23 testing activities; or 24 (k) The provisions of R307-350 shall not apply to coating products 25 on medical devices up to 800 pounds of VOC per year[.] if: 26 (i) the source has completed an application to the Federal Drug 27 Administration (FDA) for approval of the coating meeting the 28 requirements of R307-350; 29 (ii) the source has submitted to DAQ a copy of the application 30 to FDA with a demonstration that it was submitted; and 31 (iii) the source submits to DAQ a quarterly update on the progress 32 of their application to FDA. 33 (2) The requirements of R307-350-5 do not apply to the 34 following: 35 (a) Stencil and hand lettering coatings; 36 (b) Safety-indicating coatings; 37 (c) Solid-film lubricants; 38 (d) Electric-insulating and thermal-conducting coatings; 39 (e) Magnetic data storage disk coatings; or 40 (f) Plastic extruded onto metal parts to form a coating. 41 (3) The requirements of R307-350-6 do not apply to the 42 following: 43 (a) Touch-up coatings; 44 (b) Repair coatings; or 45

R307-350 November 8, 2017 Page 2 of 2 (c) Textured finishes. 1 2 **** 3 4 KEY: air pollution, emission controls, coatings, miscellaneous metal 5 parts 6 Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2017 7 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1)(a) 8

R307-353 November 8, 2017 Page 1 of 1 R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 1 R307-353. Plastic Parts Coatings. 2 3 **** 4 5 R307-353-3. Exemptions. 6 (1) The provisions of this rule shall not apply to any of the 7 following: 8 (a) Stencil coatings; 9 (b) Safety-indicating coatings; 10 (c) Electric-insulating and thermal-conducting coatings; 11 (d) Magnetic data storage disk coatings; 12 (e) Plastic extruded onto metal parts to form a coating; and 13 (f) Textured finishes. 14 (2) If a coating line is subject to the requirements for existing 15 automobile, light-duty truck, and other product and material coatings 16 or for existing metallic surface coating lines, the coating line shall 17 be exempt from this rule. 18 (3) Canned aerosol coating products up to 22 fl. oz. that are 19 used exclusively for touch-up and repairs. 20 (4) Aerospace vehicles and components subject to R307-355. 21 (5) The provisions of R307-353 shall not apply to coating 22 products on medical devices [ ]up to 800 pounds of VOC per year[.] if: 23 (i) the source has completed an application to the Federal Drug 24 Administration (FDA) for approval of the coating meeting the 25 requirements of R307-353; 26 (ii) the source has submitted to DAQ a copy of the application 27 to FDA with a demonstration that it was submitted; and 28 (iii) the source submits to DAQ a quarterly update on the progress 29 of their application to FDA. 30 (6) Research and development, quality control, or performance 31 testing activities. 32 33 **** 34 35 KEY: air pollution, emission controls, coatings, plastic parts 36 Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2017 37 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1)(a) 38

R307-355 November 8, 2017 Page 1 of 1

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 1 R307-355. Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities. 2 3 ***** 4 5 R307-355-3. Exemptions. 6 (1) R307-355 does not apply to the following: 7 (a) Cleaning and coating activities in research and 8 development, quality control, laboratory testing, and electronic 9 parts and assemblies, except for cleaning and coating of completed 10 assemblies; 11 (b) Manufacturing or rework operations involving space 12 vehicles; 13 (c) Rework operations performed on antique aerospace vehicles 14 or components; 15

(d) Touchup and repair operations; 16 (e) Hand-held aerosol spray cans up to 24 fluid ounces; 17 (f) Department of Defense classified coatings; 18 (g) Separate formulations that are used in volumes of less than 19 50 gallon per year subject to a maximum exemption of 200 gallons in 20 any calendar year; [and] 21 (h) Adhesives with separate formulations that are used in volumes 22 of less than 0.5 gallons on any day or 10 gallons in any calendar year; 23 and 24 (i) Cleaning of laser hardware, scientific instruments, and 25 high-precision optics. 26 27 ***** 28 29 KEY: air pollution, coating, aerospace 30 Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2017 31 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1)(a) 32

ITEM 6

Air Toxics

State of Utah


SPENCER J. COX

Lieutenant Governor


Alan Matheson

Executive Director


Director

DAQA-999-17

M E M O R A N D U M TO: Air Quality Board FROM: Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary DATE: October 25, 2017 SUBJECT: Air Toxics, Lead-Based Paint, and Asbestos (ATLAS) Section Compliance

Activities –September 2017 _______________________________________________________________________________ Asbestos Demolition/Renovation NESHAP Inspections 45

Asbestos AHERA Inspections 3

Asbestos State Rules Only Inspections 11

Asbestos Notification Forms Accepted 153

Asbestos Telephone Calls Answered 265

Asbestos Individuals Certifications Approved/Disapproved 47/0

Asbestos Company Certifications/Re-Certifications 7/0

Asbestos Alternate Work Practices Approved/Disapproved 9/0

Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Inspections 6

LBP Notification Forms Approved 0

LBP Telephone Calls Answered 13

LBP Letters Prepared and Mailed 9

LBP Courses Reviewed/Approved 0/0

LBP Course Audits 0

LBP Individual Certifications Approved/Disapproved 9/0


Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801) 536-4099 • T.D.D (801) 903-3978


DAQA-999-17 Page 2 LBP Firm Certifications 4

Notices of Violation Sent 0

Compliance Advisories Sent 26

Warning Letters Sent 18

Settlement Agreements Finalized 1

Penalties Agreed to:

That Asbestos Guy $ 750.00

State of Utah


SPENCER J. COX

Lieutenant Governor


Alan Matheson

Executive Director


Director

DAQA-1052-17

M E M O R A N D U M TO: Air Quality Board FROM: Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary DATE: November 7, 2017 SUBJECT: Air Toxics, Lead-Based Paint, and Asbestos (ATLAS) Section Compliance Activities –

October 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________________ Asbestos Demolition/Renovation NESHAP Inspections 33

Asbestos AHERA Inspections 2

Asbestos State Rules Only Inspections 6

Asbestos Notification Forms Accepted 168

Asbestos Telephone Calls Answered 268

Asbestos Individuals Certifications Approved/Disapproved 81/0

Asbestos Company Certifications/Re-Certifications 3/7

Asbestos Alternate Work Practices Approved/Disapproved 18/0

Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Inspections 1

LBP Notification Forms Approved 0

LBP Telephone Calls Answered 18

LBP Letters Prepared and Mailed 24

LBP Courses Reviewed/Approved 0/0

LBP Course Audits 0

LBP Individual Certifications Approved/Disapproved 22/0

LBP Firm Certifications 6


Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801) 536-4099 • T.D.D (801) 903-3978


DAQA-1052-17 Page 2 Notices of Violation Sent 0

Compliance Advisories Sent 23

Warning Letters Sent 17

Settlement Agreements Finalized 2

Penalties Agreed to:

Edge Excavation $ 1,500.00

Environmental Training Fund $ 93.75

Staker Parson dba Reynolds Excavation, Demolition, and Utilities $ 3,375.00

$ 4,968.75

Compliance

State of Utah


SPENCER J. COX

Lieutenant Governor


Alan Matheson

Executive Director


Director

DAQC-1459-17

M E M O R A N D U M TO: Air Quality Board FROM: Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary DATE: October 24, 2017 SUBJECT: Compliance Activities – September 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________________

Annual Inspections Conducted:

Major ............................................................................................. 17 Synthetic Minor ............................................................................................. 14 Minor ............................................................................................. 45

On-Site Stack Test Audits Conducted: ......................................................................... 1 Stack Test Report Reviews: ........................................................................................ 21 On-Site CEM Audits Conducted: ................................................................................. 0 Emission Reports Reviewed: ........................................................................................ 1

Temporary Relocation Requests Reviewed & Approved: .......................................... 13 Fugitive Dust Control Plans Reviewed & Accepted: ................................................ 152 Soil Remediation Report Reviews: ............................................................................... 4 Open Burn Permits Issued: ....................................................................................... 278 1Miscellaneous Inspections Conducted: ...................................................................... 26 Complaints Received: ................................................................................................. 30


Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801)536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 903-3978


DAQC-1459-17 Page 2

Breakdown Reports Received: ...................................................................................... 0 Compliance Actions Resulting From a Breakdown ...................................................... 0 Warning Letters Issued: ................................................................................................ 2 Notices of Violation Issued: .......................................................................................... 0 Compliance Advisories Issued: ..................................................................................... 5 Settlement Agreements Reached: ................................................................................. 0

1Miscellaneous inspections include, e.g., surveillance, level I inspections, VOC inspections, complaints, on-site training, dust patrol, smoke patrol, open burning, etc.

State of Utah


SPENCER J. COX

Lieutenant Governor


Alan Matheson

Executive Director


Director

DAQC-1580-17

M E M O R A N D U M TO: Air Quality Board FROM: Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary DATE: November 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Compliance Activities – October 2017 _____________________________________________________________________________________

Annual Inspections Conducted:

Major ............................................................................................... 4 Synthetic Minor ............................................................................................... 2 Minor ............................................................................................. 17

On-Site Stack Test Audits Conducted: ......................................................................... 9 Stack Test Report Reviews: ........................................................................................ 55 On-Site CEM Audits Conducted: ................................................................................. 0 Emission Reports Reviewed: ........................................................................................ 3

Temporary Relocation Requests Reviewed & Approved: .......................................... 10

Fugitive Dust Control Plans Reviewed & Accepted: ................................................ 159 Open Burn Permits Issued: .................................................................................... 1,531 Soil Remediation Report Reviews: ............................................................................... 2 1Miscellaneous Inspections Conducted: ...................................................................... 21 Complaints Received: ................................................................................................. 28


Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801)536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 903-3978


DAQC-1580-17 Page 2

Breakdown Reports Received: ...................................................................................... 2 Compliance Actions Resulting From a Breakdown ...................................................... 0 Warning Letters Issued: ................................................................................................ 8 Notices of Violation Issued: .......................................................................................... 0 Compliance Advisories Issued: ..................................................................................... 8 Settlement Agreements Reached: ................................................................................. 2

Compass Minerals .............................................................................. $7,680.00 Flaming Gorge Storage & Towing ....................................................... $225.00

1Miscellaneous inspections include, e.g., surveillance, level I inspections, VOC inspections, complaints, on-site training, dust patrol, smoke patrol, open burning, etc.

Air Monitoring

Utah Division of Air Quality

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

PM

2.5

(ug/

m3)

Days

Utah 24-Hr PM2.5 Data August 2017

Bounti ful Brigham City Erda Hawthorne

Lindon Magna Nor th Provo Ogden #2

Rose Par k Smithfie ld Spanish For k 24-hr Exce edence Value is 35 ug/m3

Exceedence Value is 35 ug/m3


0.0

10 .0

20 .0

30 .0

40 .0

50 .0

60 .0

70 .0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

PM

2.5

(ug/

m3)

Days

Utah 24-Hr PM2.5 Data September 2017

Bountiful Brigham City Erda Haw thorne


Rose Park Smithfie ld Spanish Fork 24-hr Exce edence Value is 35 ug/m3



0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

PM

2.5

(ug/

m3)

Days

Utah 24-Hr PM2.5 Data October 2017

Bounti ful Brigham City Erda Hawthorne


Rose Par k Smithfie ld Spanish For k 24-hr Exce edence Value is 35 ug/m3



0.0

10 .0

20 .0

30 .0

40 .0

50 .0

60 .0

70 .0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

PM

2.5

(ug/

m3)

Days

Utah 24-Hr PM2.5 Data November 2017

Bountiful Brigham City Erda Haw thorne


Rose Park Smithfie ld Spanish Fork 24-hr Exce edence Value is 35 ug/m3



0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

PM10

(ug/m

3)

D ays

Utah 24-hr PM10 Data August 2017

Bountiful Hawthorne Herr im an #3

Lindon Magna North Provo

Ogden Sm ithfield 24-hr Exc eedanc e Value is 150 ug/m3

Exceedance Value is 150 ug/m3


0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

PM1

0(u

g/m

3)

Days

Utah 24-hr PM10 Data September 2017

Bounti ful Hawthorne Herriman #3


Ogden Smithfield 24-hr Exceedance Value is 150 ug/m3



0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

PM10

(ug/m

3)

D ays

Utah 24-hr PM10 Data October 2017

Bountiful Hawthorne Herr im an #3


Ogden Sm ithfield 24-hr Exc eedanc e Value is 150 ug/m3



0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

PM1

0(u

g/m

3)

Days

Utah 24-hr PM10 Data November 2017

Bounti ful Hawthorne Herriman #3


Ogden Smithfield 24-hr Exceedance Value is 150 ug/m3


32.2

34.0

35.8 35.6

34.6

34.6

33.532.4

26.929.9

32.1 31.9

29.7

23.5

18.7 19.3

25.1

27.9

18.4

25.3

14.7

11.4

12.2

8.6

15.9

18.5

20.621.6

23.7

19.7

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Dai

ly M

axim

um

Tem

pera

ture

(0 C)

(Haw

thor

ne)

Ozo

ne (p

pm

)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature September 2017

Brigham Ci ty Bounti ful Erda Herriman #3 Har risvil le Hawthorne Ogden #2 Exceed. TM

28.8

31.0

32.832.8

28.6 28.329.9

29.5

28.1

28.429.1

31.0

27.1

22.0

13.8

19.119.3

24.1

19.2

20.9

24.7

16.515.5

8.9

12.7 14.9

16.5 16.317.8

15.5

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Dail

y M

axim

um T

empe

ratu

re (

0 C)

(Roo

seve

lt)

Ozone (pp

m)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature September 2017Price #2 Rooseve lt Vernal #4 Exceed. TM

28.2

31.232.9 32.6

29.0

28.928.3

29.0

25.0

26.7

29.2

28.1

25.8

21.0

13.614.4

19.7

24.1

11.1

17.9

8.1 8.4

10.8

6.4

11.3

15.6

17.918.6 18.5

15.5

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Dail

y M

axim

um T

empe

ratu

re (

0 C)

(Sm

ithfie

ld)

Ozone (pp

m)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature September 2017Smithf ie ld Exceed. TM

31.1

33.9

36.0

34.4

34.9

33.5 32.530.6

23.3

29.3

32.330.4

29.9

22.4

17.3

19.8

25.126.5

21.4

25.0

20.4

12.8

10.6

6.9

15.9

17.9

21.1

19.3

23.4

20.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

85.0

0. 000

0. 010

0. 020

0. 030

0. 040

0. 050

0. 060

0. 070

0. 080

0. 090

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Dail

y M

axim

um T

empe

rtatu

re

(0 C)

(Nor

th P

rovo

)

Ozone

(pp

m)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature September 2017North Provo Spanish Fork Exceed. TM

36.3

37.8

37.3

38.3

37.7

35.033.5

26.0 26.2

32.4

34.934.4

33.3

26.126.7

27.8

28.428.9

27.8

28.9

27.7

20.2

17.2

18.7

21.9

23.824.8

25.2

27.3

28.3

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Daily

Max

imum

Tem

pera

ture

(0C)

(Hu

rrica

ne)

Ozone (pp

m)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature September 2017Escalante Hurr icane Exceed. TM

14.2

11.4

16.718.5

17.0 16.8

24.5

13.112.9

19.3

23.4

13.6

17.4

9.3

14.3

18.0

21.721.7

25.6

21.3

12.1

20.5

17.8

16.9

20.5

17.3

16.317.8

21.6

14.013.5

0. 0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0. 000

0. 010

0. 020

0. 030

0. 040

0. 050

0. 060

0. 070

0. 080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Daily

Max

imum

Tem

pera

ture

(0 C

) (H

awth

orne

)

Ozo

ne (

ppm

)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature October 2017

Brigham Ci ty Bounti ful Erda Herr im an #3 Harrisvi lle Hawthorne Ogden #2 Exceed. TM

12.7

7.4

11.2

19.9

18.5

16.5

19.8

19.2

10.9 12.4

17.318.0

16.4

11.2

13.015.9

17.4

19.6

19.1

20.4

11.1

14.6

19.1

15.4

16.316.3

9.4

14.0

15.7

8.1

10.2

0. 0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Daily

Max

imum

Tem

pera

ture

(0 C

) (R

oose

velt)

Ozo

ne (

ppm

)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature October 2017

Price #2 Roosevelt Vernal Exceed. TM

10.9

6.6

12.2

12.0

14.6

13.4

19.7

8.4

10.3

13.2

17.6

10.3

12.4

6.9

11.5

15.8

17.919.4

20.3

16.7

8.1

15.013.8 14.2

15.615.2

13.2

15.5

16.6

8.8 9.5

0. 0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Daily

Max

imum

Tem

pera

ture

(0 C

) (S

mith

field

)

Ozo

ne (

ppm

)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature October 2017Smithfie ld Exceed. TM

13.1

11.7

17.5

20.6

19.3

16.9

23.6

12.3

14.2

19.822.5

17.0

19.3

9.8

15.0

19.6

24.3

23.2

23.7

19.9

13.5

19.8

17.617.8

22.3

16.8 16.917.3

22.5

17.3

15.1

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0. 000

0. 010

0. 020

0. 030

0. 040

0. 050

0. 060

0. 070

0. 080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Daily

Max

imum

Tem

pera

ture

(0 C

) (N

orth

Pro

vo)

Ozo

ne (

ppm

)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature October 2017North Provo Spanish Fork Exceed. TM

26.7

19.9

26.4

25.425.5

23.5

26.326.9

17.9

22.8

25.824.6

24.2

18.6

22.9

25.728.0

22.6

26.5

23.1

18.2

23.2

26.7

25.9 25.6

26.1

24.6

25.3

24.723.5

22.8

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Dai

ly M

axim

um Te

mpe

ratu

re (

0 C) (

Hur

rica

ne)

Ozo

ne (

ppm

)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature October 2017Escalante Hurr icane Exceed. TM

20.9 21.0

17.6

14.2

12.1 9.9

7.1

9.9

16.2

12.1 13.1

14.616.1

13.8

17.4 18.6

11.6

7.1

10.4

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Daily M

aximum

Tem

perature (0C) (H

awthorne

)

Ozone

(ppm)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature November 2017

Brigham Ci ty Bounti ful Erda Herrim an #3 Harr isvi l leHawthorne Ogden #2 Rose Park Exceed. TM

19.218.7

16.4 15.6

11.8

13.1

5.1 5.1

9.7

8.4

13.4

8.6

12.1

15.6

10.211.0

15.5

4.03.9

‐10.0

0.0

10. 0

20. 0

30. 0

40. 0

50. 0

60. 0

70. 0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Daily M

axim

um Tem

perature (0C) (Ro

osevelt)

Ozone

(ppm)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature November 2017Price #2 Roosevelt Vernal Exceed. TM

14.414.6

12.5

7.6

3.6

4.5

2.4 2.3

11.0

8.2 8.3

10.0

13.0

8.9 8.8

12.8

4.4

2.0

3.6

‐10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Daily M

axim

um Tem

perature (0C) (Log

an #4)

Ozone

(ppm)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature November 2017Smithfield Exceed. TM

20.4

19.9

15.714.4

14.4

9.7

6.97.9

18.416.0

13.2 12.6

19.6

14.7

19.1

17.015.2

5.2

9.1

‐ 10.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Daily M

aximum

Tem

perature (0C) (N

orth Provo

)

Ozone

(ppm

)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature November 2017North Provo Spanish Fork Exceed. TM

20.6 20.4

19.1

20.1

18.3 17.8

18.118.6

21.0 20.520.0

16.9

20.0

18.3 18.1

19.4 19.8

13.6

15.7

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

0.000

0.010

0.020

0.030

0.040

0.050

0.060

0.070

0.080

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Daily M

axim

um Tem

perature (

0 C) (Hurricane

)

Ozone (pp

m)

Days

Highest 8-hr Ozone Concentration & Daily Maximum Temperature November 2017Escalante Hurr icane Exceed. TM

Documents

State of Utah · 2017-11-27 · State of Utah . GARY R. HERBERT Arnold W. Reitze Jr ... state or federal law. 35 (b) At such time that a particular source or modification becomes