State Of The Industry: 3D-MBD & MBE

State Of The Industry: 3D-MBD & MBE

Agenda:

- 3D-MBD & MBE Definition

- 3D-MBD History

- Survey Results

- Conclusion

North America Regional Headquarters: DENSO International America, Inc., Southfield MI

Companies: 30

Employees: 23,000+

Consolidated Revenue: US$9.9 billion

Operating Profit: US$423.4 million

Powertrain Control System Engine management system, Gasoline direct injection, Hybrid components, Starter, Alternator, etc.

Thermal Systems Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC), Compressor, Heat exchangers, Battery thermal management, etc.

Information & Communications Systems Instrument cluster, Head-up display, Human machine interface technologies, Horn, Keyless entry, Wireless phone charger, etc.

Driving Control & Safety Systems Passive safety technologies, Airbag sensing system, Active safety technologies, Traction control system, Antilock braking system, etc.

Introduction: DENSO In North America

* Figures are based on IFRS. Data is accurate as of March 31, 2016 unless otherwise stated.

* U.S. dollar amounts have been translated, for convenience only, at the rate of 112.68 yen = US$1, the approximate

exchange rate prevailing on March 31, 2016. Billion is used in the American sense of one thousand million.

Automotive Products

Introduction: 3D-MBD & MBE Definition

Source: http://www.model-based-enterprise.org/model-based-definition.html

The National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) defines 3D-MBD in two ways:

(1) The Model Based Enterprise (MBE) is made up of many related processes.

At its core is the product definition which we refer to as the Model Based

Definition (3D-MBD).

(2) An annotated CAD model that contains all of the information needed to define

a product. This annotated model replaces the traditional drawing.

Thus, a drawing is created by exception not as a standard process.

Introduction: 3D-MBD & MBE Definition

3D Master CAD Model With 3D Annotations Fully Leveraged By The Enterprise

Model Based Enterprise

(MBE)

3D Master CAD Model With 3D Annotations 2D Drawings By Exception

Model Based Definition (3D-MBD)

Model Authority

2D Master Drawing 3D Model Not Verified Or Configuration Controlled

2D Master Drawing With Associative 3D Model 3D Model Is Verified & Configuration Controlled

Drawing Centric

Model Centric

Drawing Authority

Introduction: 3D-MBD History

Date Standard Purpose

Aug 2003 ASME Y14.41 Defines how to organize and present product definition data (ex: geometric tolerances, datums, notes, etc) in 3D model

Dec 2006 ISO 16792 Similar to ASME Y14.41, defines method to show product definition in 3D model

June 2008 SASIG D-27 Defines method to document information in 3D model required by all areas involved in product creation (ex: manufacturing, etc)

Standards Defining Requirements For Annotating 3D Models Have Existed For Over A Decade

Introduction: SASIG 3D-MBD/MBE Survey

Survey Participation:

Survey Purpose: Identify Current State of 3D-MBD Utilization

Identify Automotive Industry Readiness to Adopt 3D-MBD & MBE

Business Model

Company Size

Survey Results: Company Participation

Product Type

Number of

Employees

Company Participation Represents Cross-Section of Automotive Industry

Survey Results: Data File Format Usage

Native CAD

Light-Weight Data

Neutral Formats

96.1%

45.1%

21.6%

CAD Data Formats Utilized by Survey Participants:

Many Companies Are Utilizing Data Formats Required For 3D-MBD & MBE

Companies Familiar With 3D-MBD Concept

Companies Familiar With Automotive Direction

Survey Results: 3D-MBD Familiarity

Large Percentage of Companies Are Familiar With 3D-MBD Concept & Automotive Direction

Survey Results: 3D-MBD Current Usage

Companies Currently Utilizing 3D-MBD Key Reasons: Not Using 3D-MBD

Companies Are Familiar With Concept; However, Large Percentage Are Not Utilizing 3D-MBD

• Customer Doesn’t Require It

• Lack Downstream Consumption Systems

• Belief That It Is Not Possible/Necessary

• Have Not Conducted Investigation

• Lack Understanding of Benefit/Value

• Lack Supplier Readiness

• Lack Resources To Proceed

Parts Produced Using 3D-MBD Only 3D-MBD Can Drive Production Systems

Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Have Not Fully Implemented MBE

Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption

Convert 3D-MBD to Drawings Create Drawing If 3D-MBD Received

Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Still Utilize 2D Drawings

Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption

3D-MBD Used For Quality Inspection 3D-MBD Used For Virtual Manufacturing

Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption

Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Use It Primarily In Quality Inspection & Virtual Manufacturing

Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Recognize Usage Can Occur Across Enterprise

Departments Who Can Utilize 3D-MBD

Survey Results: 3D-MBD Consumption

Survey Results: Impact Of 3D-MBD

Labor Cost Reduction

Manufacturing Cost Reduction

Data Quality Improvement

Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Have Begun to Recognize Value, But It Is Not Fully Realized

Survey Result: Obstacles Preventing MBE

Companies Who Currently Utilize 3D-MBD, Recognize Obstacles Preventing Full MBE

Obstacles Preventing Full MBE

Survey Results: 3D-MBD Interest Level

Key Reasons: Lack Interest in 3D-MBD Companies Interested in Utilizing 3D-MBD

• Don’t Understand Concept

• Not Necessary

• Have Not Considered It

• Not Possible

• Not Likely To Use

Companies May Not Currently Utilize 3D-MBD; However, High Interest Level Exists To Utilize 3D-MBD

Conclusion

•Auto Industry Has Been Slow to Adopt 3D-MBD •Standards Have Existed For Over A Decade

•Small Percentage of Companies Utilizing 3D-MBD

•Auto Industry Seems Ready to Take 3D-MBD Direction

•High Familiarity & Interest Level in 3D-MBD

•Currently Utilize Required File Formats

•Increased Effort to Promote 3D-MBD Is Necessary •Address Key Reasons For Lack Of Adoption

• Increase Awareness of Value/Benefit