STATE HIGH PROJECT - State College Area School District€¦ · · 2014-06-05STATE HIGH PROJECT RESPONSE TO REQUEST ... Turner’s professional team of estimators and K‐12 construction

STATE HIGH PROJECTRESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES

June 4, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Cover Le er

2. Project Staffi ng

3. Mul ple Prime Procurement Strategy

4. LEED Experience

5. Building Informa on Modeling (BIM)

6. Site Logis cs

7. Value Engineering

8. Change Orders

9. Similar Project Experience

10. Fee

June 4, 2014 Mr. Ed Poprik Director of Physical Plant State College Area School District 131 West Nittany Ave. State College PA 16801 Dear Ed: Congratulations on the successful referendum that enables the State College Area School District to move forward on this exciting project! My staff has caught the enthusiasm and wants to add State High to the list of our successful projects for your District. In reading through the RFP and your website, we see the efforts already expended on this much needed high school project. Turner’s professional team of estimators and K‐12 construction management professionals are ready to continue with that high level of commitment and bring the expertise required through the preconstruction and construction stages to ensure that the project goals are constantly exceeded. Turner’s interest in this project stems from our prior work for the District but also from the complexity challenges of the logistics, phasing and schedule that will allow the State High to continue ‘instructing while constructing’. We pride ourselves on excelling at the most difficult projects, and your project aligns with that challenge. Our role as solely an Owner’s Agent in the K‐12 marketplace allows us to readily identify with the administrators, staff, students, parents and community: they want a school that matches their budget, exceeds their expectations, creates a positive learning environment and is ready as soon as possible! We want to deliver that. In considering Turner’s proposal, please review our capabilities in:

Pre‐Planning: We provide a management approach that focuses on up‐front planning and accurate pricing in the earliest stages of preconstruction to ensure the foundation for a successful project. Turner’s estimators have an extensive database of unit costs based on actual purchases that reflect the latest market conditions. Accordingly, we know both the market and the contractors, giving us the tools needed to optimize bid packaging.

Communication: We are a team player and understand the importance of communicating with all the team members including the Citizen’s Advisory Committee and the stakeholders. Turner’s collection of project data throughout the project includes changes in entrances, egress, and parking at every phase, and can be assembled and customized to give the District timely information in the format most useful to them. Monthly Board Reports, weekly Executive Summaries, even daily information available on a website can be shared as appropriate.

BIM: Turner was the first construction manager in this market to drive the use of BIM for the benefit of the Owner, contractors and overall quality of the project. We bring our expertise to benefit you throughout the project.

LEED: We have a Builder’s perspective and a track record of success in attaining LEED certification on our projects. We look forward to the opportunity to demonstrate how we can be an integral part of your team and personally introduce our staff. If you have any questions, please contact me at directly at (412) 709‐5310. Sincerely, TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Joe Milicia Jr. Vice President & General Manager

Turner Construction Company Two PNC Plaza 620 Liberty Avenue, 27th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222-2719 phone: 412-255-5400 fax: 412-255-0249

STATE HIGHSTAFF ORGANIZATION

KURT JOHNSONSenior Project Manager

BOB HENNESSEYProject Executive

ADAM HINDSProject Superintendent

KRISTINE RETETAGOS,LEED AP BD+C

Preconstruction Manager

MONTY TUCKWILLERProject Engineer

LOU LONDINOProject Engineer

PHIL CORRIESuperintendent

TARA CONNOR, LEED APID+C

Estimator

PRECONSTRUCTIONFIELD OPERATIONS ENGINEERING

DAN GREENEEstimator

SEAN MYERSSafety Director

1

RE

SU

ME

BACKGROUND Bachelor of Arts, Economic and Business

Washington & Jefferson College

26 Years Experience at Turner

30 Hour OSHA Certificate

EXPERIENCE Greater Johnstown School District High School & Stadium, Johnstown, PA 165,000 s.f. of new construction and 83,000 s.f. of renovation work. The new building was constructed in the former parking lot and baseball field. Approximately 80% of the existing structure was later demolished. The renovation of the 1920’s historic Cochrane Auditorium included restoration of the brick exterior, refurbished seating, flooring, plaster repair, and new mechanical and sound systems. Improvements to the 22-acre site include a designated bus area, baseball and softball fields. Mt. Lebanon School District, Elementary School Renovations, Pittsburgh, PA Bob was the on-site Project Manager for the major renovations and additions of approximately 346,000 sq. ft. at 5 different elementary schools: Jefferson, Lincoln, Markham, Hoover, and Washington. The district’s intent was to renovate the schools concurrently during only the summer months, but two additional schools were renovated the prior summer with a different firm and problematic results. Bob suggested earlier bidding to allow for long lead items, and after-hours work in April and May to prepare for summer construction. The two schools requiring more extensive work were renovated in a subsequent summer. Good planning allowed new MEP systems, technology wiring, windows, roofing, and utility upgrades to be done in a compressed schedule, with no delay to school opening. There were a total of 23 primes for the 3 schools In the first phase, and 12 primes for the remaining 2 school.

Richland High School, Johnstown PA Richland had a building that was declared structurally unsafe in the middle of the school year, so they needed a fast paced, well managed program to build a new school. Bob served as the Project Executive overseeing the staff in preconstruction and construction. This $37M school was completed in 19 months with 14 prime contractors, in time for the 2007 school year, and met the district's expectation of keeping the project on time and within budget. Armstrong Area School District, West Hills Primary and Intermediate Schools, Kittaning, PA Bob was the Project Executive overseeing preconstruction and construction efforts on a tight budget project with extensive sitework at an occupied school. University Place, Morgantown, WV Two residential high rise buildings with retail, building amenities, and two levels of underground parking. The apartment style building will contain approximately 96 units varying from 224 bedrooms and will house approximately 318 beds. The suites style building will contain approximately 126 units varying from 324 bedrooms and will house approximately 490 beds. Westinghouse Electric Company New Campus Headquarters Buildings 1-3, Cranberry Twp., PA Three Class A, single tenant, office buildings containing 844,595 sq. ft. of gross building with related parking, tenant improvements, landscaping and other site improvements. Buildings are steel framed structures with concrete slab-on-deck floors with a combination of aluminum curtainwall, aluminum windows, insulated metal wall panels, brick, and polished concrete block exterior. Roof system is a Thermoplastic membrane system. Westinghouse Electric Company New Campus Headquarters Building 4, Cranberry Twp., PA Building 4 is a 122,000 sq. ft. office building and includes three occupied floors with a mechanical penthouse. The building consists of office space, conference rooms, cafeteria, small prep-kitchen and kitchenettes.

BOB HENNESSEY Project Executive

2

RE

SU

ME

BOB HENNESSEY Project Executive

FBI – Biometrics Technology Center, Clarksburg, WV Construction of a 400,000 sq. ft. office building and a 20,000 sq. ft. Central Utility Plant. The project is being designed and constructed to achieve a LEED certification from the United States Green Building Council. ALCOA Corporate Center, Pittsburgh, PA $65M Construction of a New World Class Headquarters. The building is open landscape, eleven-foot ceilings, open atrium, glass and aluminum curtainwall with high tech workstations and a 200-car parking garage sealed for a 100-year flood. The building is 260,000 s.f. while the below ground parking garage consists of two levels totaling approximately 89,000 s.f. West Virginia University Charles Wise Library, Morgantown, WV $30M Addition to the existing library of 114,000 s.f. and minor renovations to the existing library, including data cabling and electrical, and security/surveillance systems. Project included several tie-ins to the exiting building and a connecting tunnel. Monroeville Community Park, Monroeville, PA Development of a community park on 115 acres. Work included: infrastructure installation (utilities, roads, parking lots, etc.); athletic fields: 4 baseball/softball field complexes, 10 soccer field complexes, 6 tennis courts, 2 basketball courts, & volleyball/shuffleboard/bocce ball courts; and recreational areas (picnic shelters, court area, community gardens, nature trails etc. Presque Isle Downs, Erie, PA $180M Fast-track construction on a 235-acre site of a 160,000 casino which was 65% tilt-up architectural precast panels to accommodate the fast-track construction process. Exterior façade was erected in 6 weeks. Work also included sitework prep, a Paddock Administration Building which is a stand-alone 25,000 sq. ft. masonry building housing offices for the Racing Commission and Owner administrative staff and amenities for the Jockey’s. Also construction of a thoroughbred race track facility consisting of an

eight furlong track, a grandstand and barns, and approximately 4,000 parking spaces. Majestic Star Casino, Pittsburgh, PA Performed preconstruction for this new 444,000 s.f. structural steel framed building for a 5,000 slot parlor with associated entertainment and food & beverage amenities. Also included is a new 3,422 car 10-level parking structure adjacent to gaming facility.

1

RE

SU

ME

BACKGROUND Civil Engineering / Construction Management

University of Pittsburgh 27 Years Experience at Turner 30 Hour OSHA Certificate

PROJECT EXPERIENCE Cheektowaga/Sloan Union Free School District, Buffalo, NY Construction Management consulting services for cafeteria additions and classroom renovations to the elementary school and classroom additions/renovations to the high school. Technology upgrades were administered to all schools. Penn State Information and Science Technology Building, State College, PA Three-story, 207,000-sq. ft. building that houses the School of Information Sciences and Technology and the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. The building features a “cybortorium” with multiple communications and information media for 150 students; a cyber cafe featuring a video wall with images from around the world; a wireless environment for laptops and personal digital assistants; and telephone, cable television, satellite and computer backbone connections. Penn State Eastview Terrace Housing, State College, PA An undergraduate neighborhood located on a 17-acre site at Penn State’s University Park Campus. The project consisted of seven, 3- and 4-story buildings (330,000 total sq. ft.) that house 808 single-bed suites with private bathrooms. Each house averages 12-15 student rooms, a study/social space, and laundry facilities. Each of the 808 air-conditioned single rooms has a private bathroom and a refrigerator/microwave. Electricity, heat, water and TV, phone, and Internet connections are included as well. Each room has separate lines for phone and Internet connections.

University of California at Berkeley Research Center, Berkeley, CA Superintendent for the construction of this new research building on the UC Berkley campus. It included laboratories, classrooms, and offices space as well. FBI – Biometrics Technology Center, Clarksburg, WV Construction of a 400,000 sq. ft. office building and a 20,000 sq. ft. Central Utility Plant. The project is being designed and constructed to achieve a LEED certification from the United States Green Building Council. FedEx Ground, Coraopolis, PA A 135,000-sq. ft. expansion to the FedEx Ground headquarters facility, including 540 new parking spaces in a surface lot. The new expansion integrated open work areas, offices, conference and work rooms, restrooms, storage rooms, mechanical, electrical and communication rooms, elevators and other related space. Monongalia General Hospital, Morgantown, WV This project consisted of 198,000 sq. ft. of new hospital space and 192,000 sq. ft. of renovated space. New construction provided: Pharmacy, Central Sterile Supply, new hospital entrance/concourse, new Emergency Department, Imaging Department expansion, 16-bed ICU, Medical Records area and new, all-private patient units. Renovation work was performed on all levels of the existing building.. Butler Hospital New Acute Care Patient Tower, Butler, PA New 7-story, 209,678 sq. ft in patient tower. The new inpatient tower includes a 24-bed critical care unit, a 10-room surgical suite and 52 additional medical-surgical beds. The facility also includes nursing, diagnostic/ treatment, support services, administration spaces education and conference facilities and retail space.

KURT JOHNSON Senior Project Manager

2

RE

SU

ME

KURT JOHNSON Senior Project Manager

York Hospital, York, PA New 5-story, 248,100-sq. ft. Patient Care Tower and Atrium. The new Tower, which includes provisions for 6 additional floors, includes an Ambulatory Care Center as well as bed floors. Program areas include a Heart Center, MRI, medical/surgical beds, OB/GYN beds, receiving/ materials management, and mechanical space. Magee-Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA Five-story, 450,000 s.f. ambulatory care center/ teaching hospital with a main entry pavilion, conference center and underground parking. The Medical Office Building is being built on top of two existing levels. Shadyside Hospital West Wing Addition, Pittsburgh, PA Construction of a 9-story, 171,300-sq. ft. addition to the main hospital tower. The Project also included new concourse totaling 4,200 sq. ft. which connects the new addition to the new Physicians’ Office Building. Construction included a new lab area, administration, reception and dining area, 8 operating rooms and a floor devoted to mechanical/electrical equipment. The building is a structural steel frame with concrete filled metal deck. The exterior wall consists of limestone and brick veneer with block back-up. St. Luke’s Rush Presbyterian, Chicago, IL Project involved the expansion of an existing hospital structure. The construction was built over an elevated subway. St. Mary’s of the Angels, New Community Living Center, Amherst, NY New construction of a 2-story, 104,380-sq. ft. community living center on 7 acres of land. This new construction consisted of an administrative space, residence space with 58 apartments, a chapel, 20 skilled nursing rooms, 8 Immediate Care Rooms and sitework as well.

Johnson & Johnson Canal Ponds Expansion, Rochester, NY Construction of a new 4-story research and development addition with a connecting bridge to the existing office complex. The 117,000-sq. ft. addition included offices, biological laboratories, sales and marketing areas, administrative areas and other support services.

RE

SU

ME

KRISTINE RETETAGOS, LEED AP BD+C Preconstruction Manager

BACKGROUND MBA at University of Pittsburgh, Katz School of

Business

Bachelor of Architectural Engineering The Pennsylvania State University

LEED Accredited Professional

15 Years of Experience at Turner Pittsburgh Public Schools, Pittsburgh, PA Preconstruction estimating for Cupples Stadium as part of our construction management services for the implementation of the Summer 2009 Capital Projects. Ringgold Elementary School South, New Eagle, PA New 100,500 sq. ft. elementary school. Project was renovations to existing 54,000 sq. ft. middle school and a new addition of 46,500 sq. ft. for the new Ringgold Elementary School South. Penn State Altoona – Port Sky Café, Altoona, PA 6,808 sq. ft. addition and 9,727 sq. ft. renovation to existing campus dining facility. Community College of Allegheny County K. Leroy Irvis Science Center, Pittsburgh, PA New 68,000 sq. ft., 5-story, science building. Building components include: microbiology labs, biology labs, geology labs, physics labs, multimedia labs, chemistry Labs. **LEED components will be incorporated. Carnegie Science Center Pavilion, Pittsburgh, PA - Major renovation of 150,000 square feet of existing space, and an addition of 70,000 square feet of exhibit space in a new, five-story east wing and entry atrium. Penn Hills School District, Penn Hills, PA Provided estimating services for the new 295,000 sq. ft. senior high school grades 9-12 and the new 172,933 sq. ft. elementary school and District Administration offices. The high school included new parking lots for visitors, faculty, and students; a new athletic practice field; and new roads and sidewalks.

Tullio Arena Expansion and Renovation, Erie, PA Renovation of approximately 26,000 sq. ft. of existing space and the construction of approximately 98,000 sq. ft. of new space. The scope of the construction/renovation includes facility lobbies, vestibules, administrative offices, team store, training areas, ice floor, mechanical rooms, food service preparation areas, concession/dining areas, concourses, arena seating areas, luxury boxes, club seating, mead production areas, box offices, exterior street scaping and related public gathering areas. West Virginia University Charles Wise Library, Morgantown, WV An addition of 114,000 sq. ft. and renovations to the existing library. The new addition was constructed in front of the existing library with connections at two floors. Phasing was necessary to allow the existing library to be operational during the construction of the new addition. Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens – Center for Sustainable Landscapes, Pittsburgh, PA This one-of-a kind project for Phipps consists of construction of a new 24,000 sq. ft. classroom and office building with unique sustainability certification requirements. This building will emerge as a “living building” exceeding LEED Platinum Certification by generating its own energy with renewable resources and capturing all water used on site. Selective demolition and alterations to an existing adjacent building on the Phipps campus is also part of the project. Phipps Conservatory - Welcome Center, Production Greenhouses, Tropical Rainforest and Special Events Facilities, Pittsburgh, PA Demolition of 40,000 sq. ft. of existing buildings and construction of 60,000 sq. ft. of new facilities, including a 12,000-sq. ft. Welcome Center that will house a central area for ticketing, a new gift shop, and a café with seating for 80 under a 46’ high glass dome. A new start-of-the-art Production Growing House and Tropical Rain Forest are part of the second phase of the project, which includes a 55’ high glass roof. A new Special Events Facility will be located next to the tropical rain forest to be utilized for various functions and events. LEED Silver Certified.

2

RE

SU

ME

KRISTINE RETETAGOS, Preconstruction Manager

FBI – Biometrics Technology Center, Clarksburg, WV Construction of a 400,000 sq. ft. office building and a 20,000 sq. ft. Central Utility Plant. Work also included core and shell for a 6,500 sq. ft. classified data center. The project is being designed and constructed to achieve a LEED certification from the United States Green Building Council. University Place, Morgantown, WV Mixed use project consisting of two residential high-rise buildings totaling 315,000 sq. ft. sitting on top of a pedestal containing 41,000 sq. ft. retail space, building amenities, and one level of underground parking. Each building will have an elevated courtyard that will cover the retail, amenity, and parking uses. The Gardens, Pittsburgh, PA – $66M New construction for a 176 room limited service hotel, approximately 100,000 SF of office space, approximately 23,000 SF of destination retail, and a 300 car parking garage. Westinghouse Electric Company New Campus Headquarters Buildings 1-3, Cranberry Twp., PA Three Class A, single tenant, office buildings containing 844,595 sq. ft. of gross building with related parking, tenant improvements, landscaping and other site improvements. Buildings are steel framed structures with concrete slab-on-deck floors with a combination of aluminum curtainwall, aluminum windows, insulated metal wall panels, brick, and polished concrete block exterior. Roof system is a Thermoplastic membrane system. Included was a 20,000 sq. ft., tier 3 data center with a new 1.5MW generator and dedicated mechanical equipment. The Data Center included an access flooring system and utilized a power shedding algorithm. Westinghouse Electric Company New Campus Headquarters Building 4, Cranberry Twp., PA Building 4 is a 122,000 sq. ft. office building and includes three occupied floors with a mechanical penthouse. The building consists of office space, conference rooms, cafeteria, small prep-kitchen and kitchenettes.

Butler Hospital New Acute Care Patient Tower, Butler, PA New 7-story, 209,678 sq. ft in patient tower. The new inpatient tower includes a 24-bed critical care unit, a 10-room surgical suite and 52 additional medical-surgical beds. The facility also includes nursing, diagnostic/ treatment, support services, administration spaces education and conference facilities and retail space. Bridgeside II Office Building, Pittsburgh, PA Five-story core and shell, 165,000 sq. ft. office building and adjacent site amenities. The office building’s a steel structure with deep foundations. The exterior is a combination of curtainwall, metal panels and cast stone veneer. The sitework included a plaza to the north, a landscaped edge along the east river and a recessed loading service. The building was designed to house lab and office space. FedEx Ground, Moon Township, PA A 135,000-sq. ft. expansion to the FedEx Ground headquarters facility, including 540 new parking spaces in a surface lot. The new expansion integrated open work areas, offices, conference and work rooms, restrooms, storage rooms, mechanical, electrical and communication rooms, elevators and other related space. River Vue Apartments, Pittsburgh, PA 297,000 sq. ft. renovation of the 16-story former Pennsylvania State Office Building. The project is an interior renovation to create 218 rental apartment units, with two floors of parking and support spaces, such as, a fitness center, game room, coffee shop and a deli. Soffer Apartment Building Concept Study, Pittsburgh, PA Conceptual estimating services for a 108,519 sq. ft. apartment building consisting of 89 units. Siemens, Pittsburgh, PA – Pre-construction services for their manufacturing facility expansion.

BACKGROUND B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Pittsburgh

17 Years of Experience at Turner

30-Hour OSHA Certificate EXPERIENCE Seneca Valley School District High School Addition, Harmony, PA 3-story, 40,000-sq. ft. addition that added 12 classrooms to the existing high school. In addition, the current cafeteria was expanded, and the kitchen was renovated. The Project also involved an addition to the Seneca Valley TV studio. Penn Hills School District, Penn Hills, PA New 295,000 sq. ft. senior high school grades 9-12. The new high school included new parking lots for visitors, faculty, and students; a new athletic practice field; and new roads and sidewalks. Upper St. Clair School District Streams Elementary School, Pittsburgh, PA 10,000-sq. ft. addition which included 8 classrooms throughout 2 floors, a multi-purpose room, administration space and a new kitchen area. Also included on this project was the renovation of 9,000 sq. ft. of existing classroom space, the gym, and the kitchen area. Mt. Lebanon School District Hoover Elementary School, Pittsburgh, PA Superintendent for this 65,000-sq. ft. renovation to Hoover Elementary School including new MEP systems, technology wiring, windows, roofing, flooring and cafeteria and utility upgrades. The Pennsylvania State University Hetzel Union Building, State College, PA Additions and renovations to the Hetzel Union Building. The additions included a 5-story main addition; a smaller 1-story addition to the existing ballroom; a new 3-story freight elevator and other modifications to the existing loading dock; and a new full-service kitchen, main entrance portico. Interior renovations to the existing building included architectural- and code-related improvements to the entire facility.

University of Pittsburgh Ruskin Hall, Pittsburgh, PA Renovation of the Ruskin Hall Apartments. The work includes General Construction, Plumbing, HVAC and Electrical work. The existing facility houses 176 apartment units consisting of 1- and 2-bedroom apartments, each with a kitchen and bathroom. The completed project will result in 178 completely renovated apartments. FBI – Biometrics Technology Center, Clarksburg, WV Construction of a 400,000 sq. ft. office building and a 20,000 sq. ft. Central Utility Plant. The project is being designed and constructed to achieve a LEED certification from the United States Green Building Council. Westinghouse Electric Company New Campus Headquarters, Cranberry Twp., PA Three Class A, single tenant, office buildings containing 844,595 sq. ft. of gross building with related parking, tenant improvements, landscaping and other site improvements. Buildings are steel framed structures with concrete slab-on-deck floors with a combination of aluminum curtainwall, aluminum windows, insulated metal wall panels, brick, and polished concrete block exterior. Roof system is a Thermoplastic membrane system. Westinghouse Electric Company New Campus Headquarters Building 4, Cranberry Twp., PA Building 4 is a 122,000 sq. ft. office building and includes three occupied floors with a mechanical penthouse. The building consists of office space, conference rooms, cafeteria, small prep-kitchen and kitchenettes. LTV South Side Works Parking Garage #3, Pittsburgh, PA Turner is providing construction management services for a 337,190 s.f., 865 spaces, 7½ story, precast parking garage. LTV South Side Works Parking Garage #4, Pittsburgh, PA Turner is providing construction management services for a 147,901 s.f., 409 spaces, 5½ stories parking garage. The garage is precast with double T’s and the exterior has architectural relief with an aggregate finish.

ADAM HINDS Project Superintendent

ADAM HINDS Project Superintendent

Magee-Womens Hospital Parking Garage, Pittsburgh, PA An MEP design build, 191,960-sq. ft., 540-car parking garage. This new, pre-cast garage consists of 3 levels, with 2 levels below surface and one level at the surface. The garage has a connecting link to the hospital’s main concourse. Work included a precast column and ‘T’ structure erected on a caisson foundation. Conemaugh Health Systems Clinical Pavilion at Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, PA New 250,000-sq. ft. building adjacent to the existing hospital. This construction consisted of an Emergency & Trauma Center, a 1-story covered parking lot, loading and receiving docks, shell space, a helipad, operating rooms, maternity, kitchen/cafeteria and a bridge connecting the Clinical Pavilion with Good Samaritan Medical Center.

1

RE

SU

ME

BACKGROUND Bachelor of Architectural Engineering

Construction Management Option, The Pennsylvania State University

3 Years Turner Experience / 7 Years Total Experience

LEED Accredited Professional

Certified Construction Contract Administrator – Construction Specifications Institute

EXPERIENCE Pittsburgh Public Schools – Fulton Elementary Window Replacement Window replacement project in a fully occupied elementary school. The scope of the work included replacement of 150 windows. Security screens were refurbished and added to the ground level and gymnasium. The project also included replacement of window treatments. Work occurred off hours so there was limited disruption to building occupants. Deer Lakes High School – Deer Lakes School District Assisted in overseeing approximately $30 million in multiple prime contracts for the additions and renovations to the high school. LEED Gold Certified.

Stewartsville Elementary School – Norwin School District Assisted in close-out of approximately $16 million worth of prime contracts for the new elementary school. West Allegheny High School – West Allegheny School District Assisted in overseeing approximately $25 million in multiple prime contracts for the additions and renovations to the high school. Norwin School District Administrative Building Additions and renovations to the school district’s administrative facility. Community College of Allegheny County K. Leroy Irvis Science Center, Pittsburgh, PA New 68,000 sq. ft., 5-story, science building. Building components include: microbiology labs, biology labs, geology labs, physics labs, multimedia labs, chemistry Labs.

Erie Insurance Arena Renovation and Expansion, Erie, PA Renovation and expansion of the Louis J. Tullio Arena in Erie, Pa. The arena was expanded from 152,000 sq. ft., to a total area of 218,000 sq. ft. The scope of work included added seating, expanded concourses, administrative offices, a team store, training areas, mechanical rooms, food service preparation areas, concession and dining areas, luxury boxes, club seating and related public gathering areas. As part of this project there were new elevators added in the new addition. University Place, Morgantown, WV Two residential high rise buildings with retail, building amenities, and two levels of underground parking. The apartment style building will contain approximately 96 units varying from 224 bedrooms and will house approximately 318 beds. The suites style building will contain approximately 126 units varying from 324 bedrooms and will house approximately 490 beds. River Vue Apartments, Pittsburgh, PA 297,000 sq. ft. renovation of the 16-story former Pennsylvania State Office Building. The project was an interior renovation to create 218 rental apartment units, with the conversion of two floors to parking and support spaces (fitness center, restaurant). The project also included the upgrade and replacement of all elevators, full replacement of all the mechanical and electrical infrastructure and service to the building. University of Pittsburgh - Benedum Hall Renovation of engineering and laboratory facilities Pursuing LEED Gold

University of Pittsburgh – Greensburg Campus Sustainable Office and Classroom Building New stand alone office and classroom facility. UPMC McKeesport – 4th Floor Shaw Wing Renovations Renovation of the 4th floor patient wing.

PHILIP CORRIE, CCCA, LEED AP Project Superintendent

1

RE

SU

ME

BACKGROUND

M.S., Systems Management, Florida Institute of Technology

B.S., Mechanical Engineering, Ohio University

US Army Logistics Management College & Command and General Staff College

Retired Lieutenant Colonel of Engineers with the U.S. Army

8 Years of Experience with Turner / 24 Years Total

30 Hour OSHA Certificate PROJECT EXPERIENCE Pine-Richland Upper Elementary School, Pittsburgh, PA New 190,000-sq.ft., school that houses grades 4-6 and accommodates 1200 students. The school is divided into two wings with a library and large group activity center connecting the two wings. Each wing includes space for special education classrooms, computer labs, and other support services. New Castle High School, New Castle, PA Preconstruction and construction of 190,000-sq.ft. new Senior High School on the site of the existing Senior High School. Also, construction management services for the addition of 72,000 sq. ft. for the Junior High. Armstrong School District, Ford City, PA Renovations to 85,400 sq. ft. of the existing K-6 West Hills School and an 18,400-sq. ft. addition for the conversion to a K-3 facility. New 87,000 sq. ft. intermediate school for grades 4-6 adjacent to the elementary school; Work included site improvements on campus. Southmoreland School District, Scottdale, PA The services provided to this client encompassed: Senior High School additions and renovations; addition of a field house, press box, concession stand and public rest room facilities at the District’s stadium; district-

wide paving, and additions and renovations to the District athletic facilities. Mars Area School District, Mars, PA preconstruction and construction phase services for a new Primary Center (K-2). Additional projects included alterations and additions to the high school as well as Team Room & Concessions additions. Campbell City School District, Campbell, OH Preconstruction phase services for Senior High School renovations and also for the construction of a new elementary school (Pre K - 8). McDonald Local School District, McDonald, OH Project Manager for preconstruction phase services for Junior/Senior High School additions and renovations (Grades 7-12). Keystone Oaks School District, Pittsburgh, PA On-site Construction Manager for renovations to Castle Shannon Elementary School. Chichester School District, Boothwyn, PA On-site Construction Manager for the construction management services. Existing school was demolished and construction was completed for the new Linwood Elementary School. Community College of Allegheny County K. Leroy Irvis Science Center, Pittsburgh, PA New 68,000 sq. ft., 5-story, science building. Building components include: microbiology labs, biology labs, geology labs, physics labs, multimedia labs, chemistry Labs. **LEED components will be incorporated. FBI – Biometrics Technology Center, Clarksburg, WV Construction of a 400,000 sq. ft. office building and a 20,000 sq. ft. Central Utility Plant. Work also included core and shell for a 6,500 sq. ft. classified data center. The project is being designed and constructed to achieve a LEED certification from the United States Green Building Council.

LOU LONDINO Project Engineer

2

RE

SU

ME

LOU LONDINO, Project Engineer

Westinghouse Electric Company New Campus Headquarters – Buildings 2 and 3, Cranberry Twp., PA Two Class A, single tenant, office buildings 230,000 sq. ft. each, include full basement and 4 occupied floors, which is primarily office space. SNPJ Recreation Center, Enon Valley, PA Project Manager for renovations to the Culkar Recreation Building including construction of an additional 10,000 sq. ft. containing the Society’s Heritage Center, Library, dining area and a new heating and ventilation system. Renovations to the existing facility included the transformation of the gymnasium into a banquet hall and stage area; expansion of the dining and bar area; the addition of a large wooden deck that overlooks the in-ground swimming pool; and alterations to the main lobby and administrative offices. Boardman Skilled Nursing Expansion, Boardman, OH Project Manager for Construction Management and General Construction of a 15,900-sq. ft. single story addition to the Greenbriar HealthCare Center. This Design/Build project typified space that was integrated into numerous assisted living facilities. The facility consisted of patient rooms, medical treatment offices, administrative offices, and hydro and physical therapy areas.

1

RE

SU

ME

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Bachelor of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University

9 Years of Turner Experience

PROJECT EXPERIENCE Pittsburgh City Schools - Cupples Stadium Renovation, Pittsburgh, PA Construction management services for the removal and replacement of the synthetic turf surface for the athletic field and track, new concrete curb wall and chain link fence. Work also included athletic field underdrains and new electrical. FBI – Biometrics Technology Center, Clarksburg, WV Construction of a 400,000 sq. ft. office building and a 20,000 sq. ft. Central Utility Plant. The project is being designed and constructed to achieve a LEED certification from the United States Green Building Council. WVUH North/Northeast Addition, Morgantown, WV New 8-story addition to Ruby Memorial Hospital, which added nearly 180,000 sq. ft. of patient care and support space, including 81 beds and 6 operating rooms. The North Addition houses 51,100 sq. ft. of operating rooms and support space, while the Northeast Tower provides 128,200 sq. ft. of intensive care unit, skilled nursing, acute care and support space. Cedars Community Hospice, Monroeville, PA A new 27,570 sq. ft., three-story hospice facility, located on a 2.5 acre site, that serves up to 16 clients and their families. The project provides the patients and families with a serene and peaceful facility. UPMC Passavant Cranberry ER Addition/ Renovation, Cranberry, PA Construction of a one-story addition to the existing Emergency Department. Work also included renovations within the existing ER.

UPMC Shadyside ER, Pittsburgh, PA 8,000 sq. ft. of renovations to existing emergency department. Work included new waiting room, upgrades to existing physical exam rooms, and addition of new exam rooms. University of Pittsburgh GSPH Crabtree & Parran Halls, Pittsburgh, PA The work in Crabtree Hall included the upgrade of an existing 849-sq. ft. Environmental & Occupational Health Lab, including lab safety and HVAC improvements. A 1,150-sq. ft. classroom was also renovated to be used for multimedia instruction for 25-35 students. University of Pittsburgh Chevron Science Center, Pittsburgh, PA Renovations to the 6th, 8th and 11th floors laboratories. University of Pittsburgh – Ruskin Hall Renovations, Pittsburgh, PA - Renovation of an existing 158,000 sq. ft., eight-story building. The renovation created 178 apartments for use as an undergraduate residence hall. Project included the modernization of the HVAC supply systems, fire alarm upgrades, and a sprinkler system. Point Park University Dance Studio/ Performance Complex, Pittsburgh, PA A new 43,000 sq. ft. dance studio complex. The new complex has three (3) double height floors and a basement which tie into an existing University high-rise structure. The building included 4 dance studios (one is a performance theater space); a complete new central chiller plant, which serves the new complex and neighboring Lawrence Hall; and a new electrical service for the new complex and replacement of the existing electrical service serving Lawrence Hall. The project is LEED Gold Certified. CMU Tepper School of Business, Pittsburgh, PA Work included improvements to the first floor courtyard and to the Dean’s suite of offices.

MONTY TUCKWILLER Project Engineer

MULTIPLE PRIME PROCUREMENT STRATEGY

STATE HIGHCM RFP

Separa on of Work and Mul ple Prime ContractsManaging projects with mul ple prime contracts can be diffi cult and fraught with claims and li ga on if the proper experience and planning is not employed on your project. Fortunately Turner Construc on is experienced in the mul ple prime arena and will protect the State College School District by u lizing our proven controls and the assignment of those individuals that have performed in in the past in this arrangement.

For this project we would develop a strategy that would provide the most control, best schedule, highest quality, and safest construc on approach at the most economical price. Our ini al thoughts and approach on how we would achieve this is outlined below.

Ini al Thoughts on Separa on Strategy

Expanded Prime Packages Beyond the Required MinimumBreaking the work into more than the minimum four prime contracts is appealing in several ways but is tempered by the ability to manage the increased number of contractors, which is where Turner can provide great benefi t to the District. The available bidder pool and their capability and bonding capacity must be considered along with overlapping trade jurisdic ons, and the logical separa on of work best done by specialists. Breaking the Prime Packages up into greater numbers might also allow for local fi rms to par cipate in what otherwise would be too large a package. Below are some ini al thoughts of the

bid packaging approach beyond the standard General Trades, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Protec on that is typical:

• Asbestos Abatement – Usually a cri cal path item that can be employed in advance of other work if held as a separate package.

• Sitework – Based on the ul mate scope of the project this package is o en best separate, par cularly if it involves specialty site ameni es such as sports fi elds.

• Kitchen Equipment – Defi nitely would be suitable for a separate package, providing the District with both schedule and cost advantages.

• Roofi ng - Cri cal to the overall progress of the schedule and typically having the longest warranty, the District may be best served by holding this contract directly.

• Laboratory Casework – Provide by a limited number of suppliers, this package can be a challenge if le to the General Trades contractor to manage.

• Technology - Lends itself to being a separate package, and includes hardware such as “Smartboards”, AV, wireless systems, etc.. These are o en bid at a later date to take advantage of the latest advances.

• Glazing - As a prime package, o en allows us to be er control the deliverables to ge ng a building enclosed while saving the mark ups that a Prime Contractor would place on this package.

• Landscaping – Depending on the design, this package may be so specialized that it warrants separate focus and control. The fact that the project spans mul ple plan ng seasons may also suggest that we take full control of this package.

• Security - Becoming increasingly important in school construc on, it is also becoming more complex. Breaking this package out will give the District the opportunity to ensure that the latest technology is available for integra on into the project.

MULTIPLE PRIME PROCUREMENT STRATEGY

STATE HIGHCM RFP

• Direct Material & Subcontract Purchases - These reduce Mark Ups of General Primes and as such we would target any items that could be included as a part of the District’s Fixtures, Furniture and Equipment (FF&E) package such as site fi xtures, lockers, auditorium sea ng, library shelving, etc.

Contract Document Management for Increased Prime PackagesAny split to the tradi onal 4-part prime packages must be done in conjunc on with the Architect’s documents. The bid documents, both drawings and specifi ca ons, must carefully delineate the scope and responsibili es of each prime contract so no gaps or overlaps exist. Turner will work with the Architect to incorporate the following items into the “front end” bid documents to ensure that the risk of managing increased number of mul ple primes is mi gated:

• Scopes of Work - will be developed by Turner as a guide to the bidders as well as the designers to delinea ng the extent of each of the prime packages.

• Document Review – Turner will evaluate the design documents and their details as a part of our “Constructability Review” prior to the issuance for bids to ensure that there are clear delinea ons between the various prime contractors’ work as well as the necessary requirements to support the expanded breakdown of work.

• Fully Integrated Schedule – Turner will develop a schedule for inclusion with the bid documents which clearly iden fi es the milestones and interrela onship of the various prime packages to avoid the basis for any schedule claims during construc on.

• Logis c Plans – Turner will provide a common logis cs plan as a part of the bid documents for the various primes indica ng laydown areas and access points

• Site Guidelines – It is essen al that a set of common site guidelines are developed with the input of the District that establish the

Safety, Procedures and Processes par cular to the project. In dealing with work of mul ple prime contractors in and around an ac ve campus a set of common guidelines is key.

• Pre-Bid Conferences – In conjunc on with the District and the designers, Turner will conduct pre-bid conferences to both develop maximum bidder interest in the project as well as remove any apprehension from the bid packaging approach ul mately employed.

LEED EXPERIENCE

STATE HIGHCM RFP

A green school is more than a building, it is a learning place where our children develop a deeper apprecia on for the environment. As we pepare them to be our next genera on of leaders and ci zens, we need to set the example for environmental stewardship and sustainability. At Turner we are commi ed to provding future genera ons with the best possible learning environment through green technologies.

We are commi ed to the success and increased adop on of sustainable construc on prac ces throughout the industry. We believe Green buildings are not only good for the environment, they also provide immediate and long-term economic benefi ts for ins tu ons, developers, building owners and occupants.

LEED CERTIFIED PROJECTSNa onally, Turner has experience on more than 700 green building projects. Locally, our experience includes:

LEED PLATINUM/LIVIING BUILDING CHALLENGE/FOUR-STARS SUSTAINABLE SITES INITIATIVE (SITES)Phipps Conservatory & Botanical Gardens• Center for Sustainable Landscapes

LEED GOLDUniversity of Pi sburgh• BST 12th Floor Lab Renova on

Point Park University• Dance Studio Complex

Sports & Exhibi on Authority of Pi sburgh• David L. Lawrence Conven on Center

PNC Bank• Legacy Project

Monroeville Chris an Judea Founda on • Cedars Community Hospice

LEED SILVERBoy Scouts of America Greater Pi sburgh Council• Camp Guyasuta McGinnis Educa on Center

Phipps Conservatory & Botanical Gardens• Welcome Center

Jones Lang LaSalle• Shell Pi sburgh Offi ce Fitout

LEED CERTIFIEDWes nghouse Electric Company• New Headquarters

Thorp Reed Armstrong• Offi ce Renova ons

UPMC • Melwood Building Renova ons

Turner recently completedPhipps Conservatory’s

Center for Sustainable Landscapes in Pittsburgh, PA.

The LEED Platinum, Net Zero Energy Building was named the

2014 Global Best Green Project

Pi - BST

PNC Legacy Project

LEED EXPERIENCE

STATE HIGHCM RFP

TURNER “GREEN” STATUS REPORT

• 795 Projects Completed or Under Construc on

• $54.9 Billion Project Volume• 217 Million Square Feet• 364 LEED Cer fi cated Projects • 272 LEED Registered Projects• 1456 LEED Accredited Professionals• ENR #1 Green Contractor 2007 - 2013

Turner will cooperate and assist State College Area School District in managing the collec on of all informa on, documenta on, records and other material or ac ons required in order for the State High project to receive (at a minimum) LEED Cer fi ca on. The following describes some of the ac vi es involved through each phase of construc on.

PRECONSTRUCTION PHASEDuring Preconstruc on, we review the projec t sustainability goals and objec ves. As part of this process, we also evaluate the design and offer sugges ons for materials and systems, including procurement strategies that incorporate energy and water effi ciencies, recycled content, local/regional sourcing (including locally harvested materials) and low VOC materials. Value-engineering sugges ons will be made considering both fi rst cost and life cycle costs consistent with the State High budget. We will also review bid documents to ensure LEED requirements for the Prime Contractors are specifi c and complete. Afterward, we work with Prime Contractors to ensure compliance with plans and specifi ca ons.

DOCUMENTATIONTo be compliant with specifi c LEED credit requirements, it is important that all contractors follow the documenta on and submi al protocols. Turner manages the individual contractors to fulfi ll the documenta on requirements necessary to achieve the targeted LEED goals.

CONSTRUCTION PHASEDuring construc on, Turner will manage all LEED related site ac vity of the Prime Contractors by monitoring the Construc on Ac vity Pollu on Preven on Plan, IAQ Management during Construc on, and the Construc on Waste Management. LEED submi als approved by the Architect for compliance with plans and specifi ca ons, are received by Turner to make certain that materials and equipment brought to the job site for installa on comply with the approved submi als. Camp Guyasuta

POST CONSTRUCTIONDuring commissioning, Turner will work with the design team, the LEED Consultant, and the Commissioning Agent to monitor contractor compliance during commissioning ac vi es.

COMMITMENTCommitment to sustainability is part of how we do business every day. With Turner, thinking Green can begin during the design phase, as we work together to highlight poten al cost savings infl uenced by mechanical equipment, control systems and architectural products.

BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING BIM

STATE HIGHCM RFP

Turner has been u lizing BIM since 2004 in an increasing number of applica ons: Clash Detec on, 3D Modeling, 4D Modeling (Includes scheduling), and 5D Modeling (Includes material es ma ng), Constructability, Laser Scanning, Site Logis cs, Turnover Management, Energy Analysis, and Model Checking. And the list is expanding.

For the Butler Hospital Addi on ($85M), The Gardens mid-rise ($60M) and Preston Hospital ($28M), Turner developed a BIM Execu on Plan to provide a structured approach for crea ng and implemen ng BIM on the project according to the selected uses. The fi ve steps within the procedure include:

• Iden fying high value BIM Goals and Uses

• Defi ning BIM Roles and Responsibili es

• Developing Informa on Exchange

• Defi ning suppor ng infrastructure in the form of contracts, communica on procedure, technology and quality control to support the implementa on

• Evalua ng subcontractor knowledge of BIM

Specifi c Approach for the State High ProjectRequiring the bidders to u lize BIM for the layout of mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fi re protec on for coordina on would be recommended. In doing so, Turner could u lize their 3D coordina on so ware to work collabora vely with the Prime Contractors and the Designers in advance of the start of work to eliminate the poten al for costly and me consuming confl icts in the work. Turner would incorporate this design coordina on requirement and a project specifi c BIM U liza on Plan in the bid documents for the State High Project.

Turner has the dedicated resources of several trained BIM Engineers and Modelers to support the project as well as the prime contractors if necessary. Turner’s in house BIM coordinator works closely with the Project Team to u lize the increasing capabili es of digital modeling. In addi on, Turner can produce a BIM Site Logis cs plan at various stages in the project to communicate and facilitate wayfi nding and safety precau ons through each phase.

Benefi ts for u lizing BIM on the State High School Project include:

Based on the implementa on of BIM on other projects we would an cipate the District to realize the following benefi ts:

• Creates a pla orm for collabora ve environment between the Contractors/CM/Designers/Owner

• Allows for be er graphical depic on of the work plan for the community as well as bidders

• Cost & schedule savings based on elimina on of costly fi eld confl icts; reduced number and need for RFI’s

• Increased accuracy of coordina on resul ng in a higher quality installa on

• Accurate measurements, allowing contractors to prefabricate off -site with confi dence

• Eliminates overall waste on the project

• Results in useable electronic as-built models of the MEP systems upon comple on

• Resultant models can be used for integra on with SCASD’s facili es management systems

Butler Hospital: Turner engaged a mechanical contractor in a Design Assist arrangement to allow the BIM coordina on to take place well in advance of the work to minimize the overall disrup on and schedule dura on of the work.

SECTION 01 31 13 ATTACHMENT E – LOGISTIC NARRATIVE

PENN HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT PENN HILLS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

LOGISTICS NARRATIVE

The construction of the new Penn Hills High School facility will take place immediately adjacent to the existing Penn Hills High School, the Penn Hills High School athletic stadium facility and the Fralic Athletic Center. These facilities will be occupied at various times by students, staff, and visitors during the duration of the construction operations. In addition, all access to the site will be by way of existing residential streets. The asbestos abatement and demolition of the current Penn Hills High School will commence after the school district has moved and occupied the new High School. In order to provide a safe and secure environment for all parties, certain procedures must be followed while performing demolition and construction operations:

There are to be no deliveries of construction equipment or materials by way of the existing high school access roads while school is in session unless prior approval is given by Construction Manager. When access is required deliveries / construction traffic will not be permitted between the hours of 7:00 - 8:00 AM and 1:30 – 3:00 PM while school is in session.

Commencement for graduating Penn Hills High School Seniors will occur in June 2011 and a date yet to be determined for the 2012 & 2013 school years. The events will be held at the Athletic Stadium that abuts the project site at the northern boundary. No work will be permitted after 3:00 PM on those days. In addition the project site is to be cleared of all debris and dust prior to the contractor leaving the site on that date. It is imperative that no dust or debris be transported by wind to the stadium area during the ceremonies. Since the site will be visible to visitors on that day, it is imperative that the site be left in a condition that is presentable to the public. The General Contractor will be responsible for cleaning / sweeping of all paved areas within the site as well as general clean up of the site to fulfill this requirement.

The fall athletic season will begin on August 1, 2011. There will be numerous athletic events held at the stadium from that date until November 30, 2011 and from August 1, 2012 to November 30, 2012. There will be no direct public access permitted from existing high school to the athletic fields until July 31, 2011. Beginning August 1, 2011 access to be provided by General Contractor via temporary stairs and newly renovated pathways as reflected on Logistic plan as well as the new parking lot.

The General Contractor is to provide 8’-0” chain link security fencing around the perimeter of the site. General Contractor is responsible for modifying the existing fencing and adding additional fencing to enlarge the area of construction. The fence shall be mounted on posts securely anchored in the ground and not by surface supported movable supports. The exact location of the fence and gates is shown on the Logistics plans that will take place immediately upon award of the contract. The fence shall secure the project site from access during non-working hours. It will be the responsibility of the contractor to determine the amount of new fence material and gates that are required to complete the site enclosure. The contractor will be responsible for moving and or altering the fence for the limits of their work. The fence and gates must be a minimum of eight feet high at all locations. The fence and gates will be removed at the end of the project. Existing fence that is removed is to be rolled up and turned into to PHSD Maintenance Department. All site / construction fencing, E&S, signage, etc. must be in place prior to any construction activities taking place. All prime contractors must provide appropriate traffic control, fencing, signage, E&S measures, site restorations, etc. for any work that will occur outside of fencing as shown on the Logistics Plans. Proper construction signage must be provided and a minimum of 2’-0” square in size on all installed fencing by the respective Prime Contractor at a minimum of every 50’.

In conjunction with the installation of site fencing and E&S controls the General Contractor will be installing a temporary parking area adjacent to the existing Boiler House which must be in place by December 31, 2010. At the same time the new water and sanitary service along Collins Drive will be underway thereby requiring construction traffic to enter / exit via Parkridge Drive which is one way within the school property. A security officer, provided by the General Contractor, is to be staged at the gate to Parkridge Drive and allow only construction vehicles to enter during working hours. This must be closely

coordinated with the Construction Manager. Each Prime Contractor must coordinate deliveries / personnel access with Construction Manager to ensure minimal disruption to school activities and safety / security of students, staff and residents. GC shall provide secured fencing system at temporary parking lot along with necessary construction signage, E&S controls, etc. A traffic control person with appropriate apparel must be provided by General Contractor during work hours for duration of this work.

The new sanitary line is to be installed so that the switchover / tie-in can be accomplished during the winter break from December 23 – 31, 2010 in coordination with Construction Manager and District activities / functions so as not to impact such. Plumbing Contractor to coordinate work with General Contractor for final elevations and ongoing sitework. Plumbing Contractor will be responsible for patching Collins Drive to match existing to allow for proper maintenance by General Contractor thru completion. Care is to be taken to properly coordinate work with adjacent property owners and to maintain safe egress at all times. The temporary storm tie-in at this location cannot occur until winter break as well. Contractors to include provisions to meet backfill requirements to allow for all tie-in work and temporary construction barriers to be installed during the winter break. Plumbing Contractor to secured fencing for sanitary line installation and at Collins along with necessary construction signage, E&S controls, etc. A traffic control person with appropriate apparel must be provided by Plumbing Contractor during work hours for duration of this work. General Contractors to include provisions to meet backfill requirements to allow for all tie-in work to be installed during the winter break.

There is work that will be required immediately adjacent to existing property owners. All Prime Contractors must ensure that their work does not impact the quality of life for these residents or creates undue harm to them or their property. Proper coordination of any work within 50’ of the property line must be coordinated with Construction Manager.

The General Contractor to install barricades with fencing along slope near existing high school access road. The extents and limits of such must be coordinated with Construction Manager. Portions of the existing curbs / site have been removed under a separate contractor. Any further deviations for such must be approved by Construction Manager and will be responsibility of General Contractor. The installation of temporary barriers and elimination of adjacent parking spaces adjacent to sanitary tie-in to existing cannot occur until the winter break from December 23-31, 2010. The temporary storm tie-in at this location cannot occur until winter break as well. General Contractors to include provisions to meet backfill requirements to allow for all tie-in work and temporary construction barriers to be installed during the winter break. General Contractor will responsible for any extensions of existing fencing to ensure construction area is separated from the existing high school areas along the temp barrier area.

Egress stairs from Construction Manager trailer area to the site to be installed and maintained by the General Contractor to access the new high school site. Final location and method of construction to be coordinated and approved by Construction Manager.

All work associated with the lower parking lot adjacent to ball field including path tie-in at existing ticket booth area must be complete by July 31, 2011. All paving, site lighting, curbs, sidewalks, seeding, etc. for the new road to Parkridge drive from area near Boiler House to be complete by July 31, 2011. The Electrical Contractor to make provisions to ensure that the lighting for these areas is operational by such time. A shuttle service will be provided by the District for student access to the Fralic Center, fields, etc. from start of construction through July 31, 2011.

Each Prime Contractor is to provide a schedule of anticipated deliveries for the next seven day period to the Construction Manager by noon on Friday so that the District is aware of upcoming deliveries and can plan to accommodate such deliveries.

Construction traffic flow is to be via Collins Drive and Universal Road for the new high school project. The use of Harvard, Garland and Parkridge Drives is prohibited while school is in session unless noted otherwise or approval is given by the Construction Manager. There will be many times when vehicles must arrive and depart the site from the same entrance. At those times the Contractor will be solely responsible for all traffic control and routing necessary to access the site, make deliveries, turn around, and depart the site. Collins Drive will be the main access road to the construction site. Collins Drive is a relatively steep residential road, with several direction changes between Universal Road and the project site. The Prime

Contractors are to be aware of these conditions and are solely responsible for all access to and egress from the site.

Construction flow for the demolition / sitework of the existing high school is to be via Garland Avenue. The General Contractor will relocate and re-establish as current set up the Construction Manager trailers to location as noted on Logistics Plan. The Electrical Contractor to provide power, phone and fiber / internet service to the trailers via underground conduits from the new high school. The General Contractor will provide and maintain a safe egress path from trailer to site area with no more than 5% grade

Parking for workers’ vehicles at the site is limited. The prime contractor is responsible for all parking arrangements for workers. If each Prime Contractor elects to permit worker parking on site, it will be responsible for all aspects of the parking plan, including but not limited to, worker and vehicle safety, all insurance requirements, traffic control, and security measures. Any additional required parking for workers will be at a remote location arranged by the prime contractor. Transportation of workers to and from any remote site is the responsibility of the prime contractor. Construction parking will be prohibited outside the construction area unless approved by the Construction Manager.

The General Contractor is to provide dust control during the demolition operations. If materials must be wetted to prevent dust from becoming airborne, the contractor is to provide all items required for the operations and is to clean up all excess water from the site on a daily basis.

The General Contractor is responsible for providing any and all temporary roadways, walkways and/or stone paving on the site that are required for the performance of the work.

The General Contractor is responsible for the protection of all public roadways from damage other than normal wear due to its construction operations. The contractor is to provide road bonds for any roads if such are required by the public entity that maintains that roadway.

All vehicles must have tires and wheels cleaned of mud, dust, mortar, grout or other substances which may be tracked onto public roadways prior to exiting the site. The Plumbing contractor is to provide and maintain a wheel wash station at each rock construction entrance through completion of the new high school at which time it will be the responsibility of the general Contractor. The General Contractor is solely responsible for making certain that all vehicles departing the site utilize the wheel wash facilities.

The Electrical Contractor shall furnish and install security lighting and surveillance cameras with a DVR storage system to monitor as noted within the location of new high school. Coordinate final locations with General Contractor and Construction Manager.

The General Contractor shall provide onsite security during non working hours through the duration of the project. The purpose of such is being a deterrence. Each prime contractor will be responsible for securing and protecting their items as noted.

Parking spaces for students and staff will be eliminated at the exit of the existing High School onto Parkridge Drive for the summer of 2011 and 2011 school year.

The General Contractor is to designate a person in responsible charge who will verify in writing at the end of each work day that the construction area is locked and secure from entry prior to leaving the site.

All security measures provided by the contractors are subject to review and approval by the Construction Manager and the School District.

The contractors may submit alternative proposals for the site logistics, but due to the proximity of the site to other School District facilities and to residential areas, only minimal changes should be anticipated. Any such proposals must be approved by the Construction Manager, the Architect and the School District, and if the alternative measures result in a reduction in cost, a deduct change order will be executed to return savings to the District. END OF 01 31 13 ATTACHMENT E

VALUE ENGINEERING

STATE HIGHCM RFP

Value Analysis is correctly defi ned as confi rming that the District’s program is delivered in the most eff ec ve and effi cient manner. With this defi ni on in mind, our approach to Value Engineering is to ensure that the end goal is met: Create the op mal learning environment while adding value for the District. The Value Analysis process is a disciplined eff ort to objec vely analyze the func onal requirements of a project and determine if poten al budget savings can be realized without impac ng the overall goals of the project. Through a systema c evalua on, high cost components are iden fi ed and are either modifi ed or eliminated if they do not contribute to the system’s basic func ons. Less costly alterna ves for specifi c func ons are developed and proposed for considera on by the team. The specifi c process used in conduc ng a Value Analysis assessment involves:

• Reviewing design informa on to establish poten al cost savings by iden fying the cost of components and the least-cost alternate(s) which performs the same func on;

• Determining the components of largest poten al cost savings;

• Performing a life-cycle cost analysis on those alternates and the original components;

• Iden fying secondary func ons which would be sacrifi ced by adop ng the alternate(s);

EXAMPLEFor the construc on of Penn Hills High School, Turner iden fi ed over sixty items for review and discussion. These included items that would become bid alternates, along with sugges ons to simplify the exterior envelope for both cost and construc blility reasons. For instance:

Turner’s detailed evalua on of the exterior wall uncovered the premium spent to locate casework on the exterior wall, with windows above and below the wall cabinets. The addi onal steel and framing premiums were out of line with a typical exterior wall, and provided exterior aeste c but minimal program value for the school district. Viewed from a construcability standpoint, the fl ashing details also were of concern. Turner off ered this as a Value Engineering item, at an es mated savings of $133,130, but it was not accepted.

A ached is the report and analysis for this project, labeled “Value Management – Budget and Decision Matrix” dated 3/12/10”, update issued 5/5/10. This spreadsheet was a working document throughout preconstruc on, and provides a history of the items considered, their value, and the team’s decision. In summary, $467,808 of Value Engineering items were accepted as a savings, and $1,750,319 were declined. Of the items declined, twenty- three (with a value of $662,896) became alternates to the base bids, which gave the district another opportunity to revisit benefi t vs. cost in light of the bid totals.

• Selec ng the alternate(s), which provide the maximum cost savings with the minimum loss of func on.

• Working with designers to determine the impact on the design itself, if any.

As each Value Analysis item is proposed, the value is tracked independently in the Value Management Report. The Project Team can con nuously evaluate prior sugges ons at any me during the budge ng process so as not to impede the design schedule.

Value Management Budget and Decision Matrix

3/12/2010

Penn Hills School DistrictNew High School

Page 1 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED

50% DD ESTIMATE VALUE MANAGEMENT TRACKING

1 Y 3/18/10 Y 3/18/2010 ($31,500) N

(3) ea X $ 10,500.00 $ (31,500.00)

2 Y 3/18/10 Y 3/18/2010 ($20,508) N

(3,148) SF X $ 6.50 /SF $ (20,462.00)

(3,148) SF X $ 0.65 /SF $ (2,046.20)

8 EA X $ 250.00 /EA $ 2,000.00

3 N 3/18/10 N 3/18/2010 ($64,930) N

(88) EA $ 1,475.00 /EA $ (129,800.00)

(16) EA $ 1,705.00 /EA $ (27,280.00)

(13) EA $ 350.00 /EA $ (4,550.00)

88 EA $ 850.00 /EA $ 74,800.00

16 EA $ 1,125.00 /EA $ 18,000.00

13 EA $ 300.00 /EA $ 3,900.00

4 N 3/18/10 N 3/18/2010 ($1,927) N

(584) SF $ 8.00 /SF $ (4,672.00)

584 SF $ 4.70 /SF $ 2,744.80

*****UPDATE ISSUED 5/5/10: as a result of VE meeting 4/29/10. Attendees to 4/29/10 meeting: J. Brimmeier, P. Donatelli, G. Walker, P. Donatelli, B. Hengelsberg, Joe S. (AI); M. Prioletto, K. Retetagos, J. Kopko (Turner); T. Gorski (Tower Engineering); R. Liberto (PHSD);

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Delete GWB at the underside of the stairs

Delete GWB laminate from the underside of the stairs

Delete Painting of GWB Ceilings

Delete solid phenolic toilet partition

Delete solid phenolic ADA toilet partitions

Delete solid phenolic urinal screens

Add painting of stairways

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Baked enamel toilet partitions in lieu of solid phenolic

Add baked enamel toilet partitions

Add baked enamel ADA toilet partitions

Add 2 x 2 ACT

Add baked enamel urinal screens

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Delete bulkheads in secondary corridors

Delete bulkheads

Owner Accept Estimate Amount and StatusArchitect Accept

Scope Description

Delete 2 scorboards from main gym and 1 scoreboard from aux gym

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Reduce quantity of scoreboardsPer 3/18/10 meeting: Accepted. Keep (2) scoreboards in the main gym and (1) in the auxilary gym.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI does not recommend due to potential vandalism and product longjevity. PHSD concurs with AI recommendation.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: For limited costs to keep in design, AI recommends to keep bulkheads in design. PHSD will follow AI recommendation.


3/12/2010


Page 2 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

5 N 3/18/10 N 3/18/2010 ($947) N

(287) SF $ 8.00 /SF $ (2,296.00)

287 SF $ 4.70 /SF $ 1,348.90

6 N 3/18/10 N 3/18/2010 ($7,425) N

(2,250) SF $ 8.00 /SF $ (18,000.00)

2,250 SF $ 4.70 /SF $ 10,575.00

7 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($69,850)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(45,803) SF $ 4.70 /SF $ (215,274.10)

22,902 SF $ 4.25 /SF $ 97,331.38

22,902 SF $ 2.10 /SF $ 48,093.15

8 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($38,400)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(104) ea X $ 450.00 ea $ (46,800.00)

104 ea X $ 300.00 ea $ 31,200.00

(152) ea X $ 540.00 ea $ (82,080.00)

152 ea X $ 390.00 ea $ 59,280.00

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Delete bulkheads in primary corridors

Delete bulkheads

Delete bulkheads

Add 2 x 2 ACT

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Interiors - Revise door spec to a more economical veneer than bamboo.

Change 50% 2 x 4 ACT (Second Look)

Add 2 x 2 ACT

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Delete stepped bulkheads in classroom corridors - 1st floor

Delete bamboo doors with narrow light

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Change acoustical ceiling tile from Optima 2x2 to 50% Optima 2x4 and 50% Second Look 2x4

Delete ACT 2x2 (Optima)

Per 3/18/10 meeting: For limited costs to keep in design, AI recommends to keep bulkheads in design. PHSD will follow AI recommendation.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI indicated that ductwork travel through the bulkheads, as well as a cove for lighting, and therefore cannot be deleted. PHSD will follow AI recommendation.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI looking into. Per 4/29/20 meeting: AI would like to keep original ceiling tiles in base bid and list VE item as DEDUCT ALTERNATE. PHSD will follow AI recommendation.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI has indicated we can accept this VE if we are eliminating pursuing LEED building certification. Need to finalize LEED decision. (see VE item #24). Per 4/29/10 meeting: Although LEED has now been eliminated from project, AI has requested to keep the original bamboo doors in base bid and change to more economical ones as a DEDUCT ALTERNATE. PHSD will follow AI recommendation.

Add oak veneer doors with narrow light

Change 50% 2 x 4 ACT (Optima)

Add oak veneer doors

Delete bamboo doors

($69,850)

($38,400)


3/12/2010


Page 3 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

9 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($57,083)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(1,935) sf X $ 30.00 $ (58,050.00)

1,935 sf X $ 0.50 $ 967.50

10 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($27,530)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(7,361) sf X $ 8.52 $ (62,715.72)

7,361 sf X $ 4.78 $ 35,185.58

11 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($96,917)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(44,053) sf X $ 6.98 $ (307,489.94)

44,053 sf X $ 4.78 $ 210,573.34

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI looking into. Per 4/29/10 meeting: AI would like to keep maximum floor colors in base bid and reduce colors as a DEDUCT ALTERNATE. PHSD following AI recommendation.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI looking into. Per 4/29/20 meeting: AI has indicated the trespa panels are for sound control and therefore would like to keep as base bid and list VE item as DEDUCT ALTERNATE. PHSD following AI recommendation.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI looking into. Per 4/29/10 meeting: AI would like to keep maximum floor colors in base bid and reduce colors as a DEDUCT ALTERNATE. PHSD following AI recommendation.

Delete 4 color linoleum

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Minimize floor colors in corridors

Add painting

Add 2 color linoleum

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Minimize floor colors in corridors & cafeteria

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Delete Trespa panels in cafeteria

Delete Trespa

Add 2 color linoleum

Delete 3 color linoleum ($96,917)

($27,530)

($57,083)


3/12/2010


Page 4 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

12 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($111,879)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(24,060) sf X $ 5.75 $ (138,345.00)

24,060 sf X $ 1.10 $ 26,466.00

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI indicated the design of the walls will be block walls. PHSD indicated that there has been concern from some on spending money on tile in bathrooms if not necessary. Since walls are block, all agreed epoxy paint will be sufficient, but AI to investigate whether local code will require anything above/beyond just epoxy paint for this application. Per 4/29/10 meeting: AI has indicated that there is not a code issue and rather than delete the CT wainscoat in the base bid - would like to keep it in the base bid and pursue (2) deduct alternates...1) to delete the wainscoat everywhere and 2) to delete the wainscoat at only the wet walls. PHSD following AI recommendation.

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Delete ceramic tile wainscot in toilet rooms

Delete ceramic wall tile

Add epoxy paint

($111,879)


3/12/2010


Page 5 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

13 N 3/18/10 N 3/18/2010 ($54,317)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(9,840) sf X $ 12.50 $ (123,000.00)

9,840 sf X $ 6.98 $ 68,683.20

14 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($674,401) N

(15,019) sf X $ 55.00 $ (826,045.00)

13,125 sf X $ 1.23 $ 16,143.75

13,125 sf X $ 9.50 $ 124,687.50

13,125 sf X $ 2.50 $ 32,812.50

(2) ea X $ 6,000.00 $ (12,000.00)

(1) ea X $ 10,000.00 $ (10,000.00)

15 ($133,130)

182 sf X $ 18.00 $ 3,276.00

182 sf X $ 13.90 $ 2,529.80

(308) lf X $ 185.00 $ (56,980.00)

182 sf X $ 2.00 $ 364.00

1,792 sf X $ 40.00 $ 71,680.00

(1,960) sf X $ 50.00 $ (98,000.00)

(28) ea X $ 2,000.00 $ (56,000.00)

Per 3/18/10 meeting: Per AI, would like this item to be a deduct alternate. PHSD concurs with AI recommendation. Therefore the item is not accepted since it will still be in the base bid, but will be an option to change once bids are received.

Add 3-color linoleum

Stair cat walk over skylight small

Roof Decking

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Simplify casework at exterior wall at classrooms. Change glass to 4' high ribbon window, stud framing elsewhere. Relocate tall storage cabinets to interior wall, eliminate wall cabinets.

Brick

Casework - wall cabinets

Interior drywall

Stair cat walk over skylight large

Simplificaion of structural steel

6" metal framing/sheathing/insulation

EPDM Roofing

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Linoleum in lieu of ceramic tile in main corridor.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI will look into. Per 4/29/10 meeting: Deleting all of the skylights is not an option, but see item #17 for changes/deduct alternates. PHSD concurs.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: Ideally, AI would like to keep design as-is, but will look into for cost savings opprtunities. Per 4/29/10 meeting: AI does not think this is a feasible option - from design or HVAC. However, will look into further and also talk with their estimator (Blundell). Turner to send over sketch to AI so they can review with Blundell. Post meeting note: AI requests to not change detail. PHSD concurs.

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Delete skylights.

Delete aluminum/glazing

Ribbon window 4' high

Skylights

Suspended Acoustics 2x4 ceiling tile and 15/16" grid

Delete cermic tile ($54,317)


3/12/2010


Page 6 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

16 Y 3/18/10 Y 3/18/2010 ($265,800) N

(26,580) sf X $ 21.00 $ (558,180.00)

26,580 sf X $ 11.00 $ 292,380.00

17a N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 TBDY,

DEDUCT ALT

sf X $ 55.00 $ -

17b N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 (59,927.50)$ Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(1,300) sf X $ 55.00 $ (71,500.00)

750 sf X $ 1.23 $ 922.50

750 sf X $ 9.50 $ 7,125.00

750 sf X $ 4.70 $ 3,525.00

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI will look into. Per 4/29/10 meeting: AI wants to keep skylights in the base bid, and is proposing (3) DEDUCT ALTERNATES. 1) Delete skylights at side corridors but add a few misc small ones. 2) At main corridor, delete skylight bewtween the (2) rotundas, but keep rotunda skylights in base bid. 3) For the two rotunda skylights, change from a custom dome to a stock dome. PHSD concurs.

NEED SKETCH FROM AI FOR PRICING

Add roofing

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Reduction of the skylights if they are not deleted. (As of 4/29 - note this item has been revised into 17a, 17b, 17c for the alternates that AI is requesting)Delete skylights at main corridor between rotundas

Add roof deck

Add ceiling

Add small skylights at side corridors

Brick

E.I.F.S.

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Utilize E.I.F.S in-lieu of utility brick above the red band at the 2nd level of the building.

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Reduction of the skylights if they are not deleted. (As of 4/29 - note this item has been revised into 17a, 17b, 17c for the alternates that AI is requesting)

Delete skylights at side corridors

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI has already anticipated this change, therefore this item is accepted. PHSD concurs.


TBD

($59,928)


3/12/2010


Page 7 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

17c N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 TBDY,

DEDUCT ALT

18a N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($45,057) N

(15,019) sf X $ 3.00 $ (45,057.00)

18b N 4/29/10 N 4/29/2010 ($17,700)Y,

DEDUCT ALT

5,900 sf X $ (3.00) $ (17,700.00)


Delete custom rotunda skylights

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Simplification of Skylight patern if they are not deleted. (square frame ILO triangle frame) ----SECONDARY CORRIDOR ONLY

($17,700)

Skylight patern simplification

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Simplification of Skylight patern if they are not deleted. (square frame ILO triangle frame)

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Exterior-Reduction of the skylights if they are not deleted. (As of 4/29 - note this item has been revised into 17a, 17b, 17c for the alternates that AI is requesting)

Per 4/29/10 meeting: The secondary corridors can be a DEDUCT ALTERNATE per AI. PHSD concurs.

Skylight patern simplification

Add standard stock skylight

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI will look into. Per 4/29/10 meeting: AI has indicated that they have discussed with mfg and this cannot be done since skylight width changes in corridor and is custom. However, it can be done in the secondary corridor. AI will make the secondary corridor a DEDUCT ALTERNATE. PHSD concurs. See VE item #18b below, created for that change.

TBD

NEED SKETCH FROM AI FOR PRICING


3/12/2010


Page 8 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

19 N 3/18/10 N 3/18/2010 ($190,995) N

(103) LF X $ 45.00 /LF $ (4,635.00)

(4,635) SF X $ 4.50 /SF $ (20,857.50)

(1,494) SF X $ 13.90 /SF $ (20,759.65)

(1,494) SF X $ 18.00 /SF $ (26,883.00)

(6) TONS X $ 680.00 /TON $ (3,914.32)

(4,635) SF X $ 1.23 /SF $ (5,701.05)

(15) TONS X $ 2,300.00 /TON $ (35,211.76)

(4,635) SF X $ 9.50 /SF $ (44,032.50)

(2,320) SF X $ 12.50 /SF $ (29,000.00)

20 Y 3/18/10 Y 3/18/2010 ($150,000) N

(1) LS X $ 150,000.00 /LS $ (150,000.00)

21 N 3/18/10 N 3/18/2010 ($97,904) N

(1) EA X $ 19,500.00 /EA $ (19,500.00)

75 SF X $ 10.00 /SF $ 750.00

(200) SF X $ 9.50 /SF $ (1,900.00)

(50) LF X $ 45.00 /LF $ (2,250.00)

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Reduce classroom quantity, adjust holding / mechanical wing in area 'H'

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Defer purchase of acoustical shells to FF &E

Reduce deck

Reduce structural steel

Reduce roof membrane

Reduce slab on grade

Reduce continuous footings

Reduce joist

Reduce CMU partitions

Reduce exterior wall

Reduce metal stud backup

Reduce face brick veneer

Reduce roof structure

Delete chairlift

Add ramp to stage

Reduce excavation

Delete half wall / railing at orchestra pit

Delete footing / foundation at pit wall

Delete acoustical shells from estimate

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Raise orchestra pit to level of auditorium floor, add ramp to stage

Per 3/18/10 meeting: AI has indicated that PDE will not allow classroom reductions. PHSD will follow AI recommendation.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: PHSD has indicated that this is a desire of the school district and cannot be deleted.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: Both PHSD and AI find this item acceptable.


3/12/2010


Page 9 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

(340) SF X $ 220.60 /SF $ (75,004.00)

22 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/10 TBD N

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Utilize electric heat in all VAV boxes in lieu of hydronic (note that there will be a sizable to the electrical estimate). This might have a negative impact on LEED and the size of the electrical service may need to increase.

Delete orchestra pit filler panels

Per 3/18/10 meeting: Per Tower Engineering - typically do experience cost savings with this but will need to look into both the mechanical credits and electrical adds to determine if this is a cost savings. Also, need to determine if need more SF with this option. If more SF needed, this option not possible. Tower to look into and provide feedback. Per 4/29/10 meeting: T. Gorski (Tower) has checked with John West (electrical - Tower) on the electrical side of things and has determined that the increased electrical size would offset mechancial cost savings and would potentially need to increase the square footage of the space for the electrical service. PHSD concurs.


3/12/2010


Page 10 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

23 N 4/29/10 N 4/29/10 ($200,000) Per 3/18/10 meeting: Tower Engineering does not think there is much cost savings opportunity with this item. Tower and Turner to discuss further to understand true cost savings. Per 4/29/10 meeting: Turner/Tower discussed in further detail off line. T. Gorski, after review, has determined that although there would be cost savings associated with the ductwork (since eliminating the second run of duct), there would be added costs when, along with the deleted OA units would be a deletion of the heat recovery wheels which would increase the chiller and boilers which were not considered in the original VE item. A savings of potentially $200K may be offset in 5-10 years when the operating costs are increased as a result of this. PHSD concurs.

Item by Turner (3/11/10): Delete the dedicated 100% OA units serving classrooms ans utilize the AHU's serving those spaces to provide the code required outside air. This will have a negative impact on LEED.


3/12/2010


Page 11 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

24 Y 4/29/10 Y 4/29/10 TBD N

25 TBD

26Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(6,720) sf X $ 11.55 /sf ($77,616)

27

Item by Tower Engineering (3/18/10): Change generator from the interior of the building to the exterior. Savings on generator exhausting (flue, fuel piping, etc) Per 3/18/10 meeting: Tower to

look into feasibility, but appears to be acceptable to all parties. Per 4/29/10 meeting: Tower looking into.

Volleyball netting and poles were not included in the 50%DD estimate. They were assumed to be included with FF&E.

Per 3/18/10 meeting: This is an acceptable item to PHSD. AI/Turner will need to prove that there are cost savings with eliminating the LEED certifications but still following "green building" standards. AI to provide LEED information so AI/Turner can price out. Tower brought up the savings on filters that will be experienced if not pursuing LEED building certification. Per 4/29/10 meeting: AI has further discussed with PHSD and priced up the VE, which exceeds the reimbursable costs further verifying why to eliminate the LEED Silver. Turner is requesting to also receive the information to verify costs.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 1 (4/29/10): Reduce number of gym divider curtains.

Deduct (3) gym divider curtains

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 2 (4/29/10): Remove volleyball netting and poles from scope of work.

Item by AI (3/18/10): Eliminate LEED Silver Certification, but still follow many of the "green building" standards.

TBD

($77,616)


3/12/2010


Page 12 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

28

ea X $ - /ea $ -

29

24,659 sf X ($0.75) /sf ($18,494)

30 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

31Y,

DEDUCT ALT

1 LS X ($75,000) /LS ($75,000)

32

33Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(1) EA X $ 19,500.00 /EA $ (19,500.00)

75 SF X $ 10.00 /SF $ 750.00

(200) SF X $ 9.50 /SF $ (1,900.00)

(50) LF X $ 45.00 /LF $ (2,250.00)

(340) SF X $ 220.60 /SF $ (75,004.00)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 6 (4/29/10): Orchestra pit cover

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 5 (4/29/10): Remove acoustic shell

Orchestra pit cover

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 8 (4/29/10): Remove orchestra pit from scope of work.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 7 (4/29/10): Provide a movable floor over the orchestra pit.

Fold-up rails (incl. w/50%DD Estimate

Delete chairlift

Add ramp to stage

Delete half wall / railing at orchestra pit

Delete footing / foundation at pit wall

Delete orchestra pit filler panels

NOTE THIS IS ALREADY INCORPORATED IN VE ITEM #20

Need more information and design.

The fold-up rails are included in the 50%DD estimate. No additional cost.

NEED TO REVISIT WITH GROUP. PER 3/18 MEETING, PHSD INDICATED WE CANNOT REMOVE FROM PROJECT.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 4 (4/29/10): Number 2 maple to replace number 1 maple at all gym floors.

Gym wood floors #2 maple in-lieu of #1 maple

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 3 (4/29/10): Add fold-up rails to bleachers.

(97,904.00)$

TBD

($75,000)

N/A

($18,494)

TBD


3/12/2010


Page 13 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

34

- ea X $ - /ea $ -

35 N/A

- sf X $ - /sf $ -

- sf X $ - /sf $ -

36Y,

DEDUCT ALT

- sf X $ - /sf $ -

13,181 sf X $ 3.75 /sf $ 49,428.75

(13,181) sf X $ 4.78 /sf $ (63,005.18)

37Y,

DEDUCT ALT

- sf X $ - /sf $ -

13,181 sf X $ 2.09 /sf $ 27,548.29

(13,181) sf X $ 4.78 /sf $ (63,005.18)

38 Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 13 (4/29/10): Cafeteria flooring changed to linoleum.

Linoleum (included in 50%DD estimate)

Add for VCT (per AI alternate)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 11 (4/29/10): Side corridors changed to sheet vinyl.

Deduct ceramic tile (per AI alternate)

Add for sheet vinyl (per AI alternate)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 12 (4/29/10): Side corridors changed to VCT.


Add for linoleum (included in 50%DD estimate)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 9 (4/29/10): Additional wireless mics.

Add wireless mics

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 10 (4/29/10): Side corridors changed to linoleum.



None included in 50%DD estimate. This was assumed as part of FF&E scope.

Side corridors are already linoleum. Ceramic tile was included in the Main corriodors and Lobbies only, and the balance of the corridors were included as linoleum per the finish schedule in the 50%DD drawings. Changing these corridors to ceramic tile is going to INCREASE the cost of the current project.

Side corridors are linoeum per the 50% DD Docs. Ceramic tile was included in the Main corriodors and Lobbies only, and the balance of the corridors were included as linoleum per the finish schedule in the 50%DD drawings.

Side corridors are linoeum per the 50% DD Docs. Ceramic tile was included in the Main corriodors and Lobbies only, and the balance of the corridors were included as linoleum per the finish schedule in the 50%DD drawings.

Per the finish schedule in the 50%DD documents, the cafeteria is indicated have linoleum floors.

TBD

($35,457)

(13,576.43)$

TBD


3/12/2010


Page 14 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

39Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(6,651) sy X $31.50 /sy ($209,496)

59,856 sf X $2.30 /sf $137,669


41 ADD ALT

(10,964) sf X $ 12.50 /sf $ (137,050.00)

10,964 sf X $ 18.00 /sf $ 197,352.00

42 ADD ALT

- sf X $ - /sf $ -

13,181 sf X $ 18.00 /sf $ 237,258.00

(13,181) sf X $ 4.78 /sf $ (63,005.18)

43

SF X /SF $ -

SF X /SF $ -

Deduct ceramic tile

Add Terrazzo

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 17 (4/29/10): All side corridors changed to terrazzo.


Add for terrazzo (per AI alternate)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 18 (4/29/10): Additional Marker Boards and Tack Boards in rooms G204, G205, G206, G207 and G208

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 15 (4/29/10): All main corridors and lobbies changed to linoleum.


Tack Board

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 16 (4/29/10): All main corridors and lobbies changed to terrazzo.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 14 (4/29/10): Classroom carpet squares changed to VCT.

Add VCT tile

Deduct carpet squares

The original Q&A's specialties and equipment number 6 states that Marker boards and Tack Boards were included in all class rooms, does the school want more in the identified rooms?

Ceramic tile was included in the Main corriodors and Lobbies only, and the balance of the corridors were included as linoleum per the finish schedule in the 50%DD drawings. Need more information and what defines a "side corridors".

THIS ITEM IS THE SAME AS ve ITEM #13. See VE #13

Marker Boards

N/A

($71,827)

60,302.00$

TBD

174,252.82$


3/12/2010


Page 15 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

44 ADD ALT

7 ea X $ 250.00 $ 1,750.00

7 ea X $ 261.53 $ 1,830.71

7 ea X $ 950.00 $ 6,650.00


46

- sf X $ - $ -

47 ADD ALT

137,544 sf X $ 1.50 $ 206,316.00

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 22 (4/29/10): All painted CMU, Horizontal joints flush, vertical joints scored.

Item by AI lableled as their Alternate 21 (4/29/10): No Bullnose CMU at end wall conditions.

Deduct bullnose CMU at end walls

Flush Joints

Manual projector screens (if motorized? Also need an outlet at screen location)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 20 (4/29/10): All doors specified as bamboo to be replased with white birch.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 19 (4/29/10): Additional projectors, mounting brackets and wiring at devided special education rooms.

Projector mounting bracket (quantity perdetermined by AI)

Wiring for each location

Please clarify if the projector screens are mortorized or manual?

THIS ITEM IS THE SAME AS VE ITEM #8. SEE VE #8

None included with the 50%DD estimate.

N/A

10,230.71$

206,316.00$

TBD


3/12/2010


Page 16 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

48Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(25,962) sf X $ 13.50 /sf $ (350,487.00)

(9,498) sf X $ 14.00 /sf $ (132,972.00)

(103,415) sf X $ 16.50 /sf $ (1,706,347.50)

13,400 lf X $ 20.00 /lf $ 268,000.00

25,962 sf X $ 11.50 /sf $ 298,563.00

9,498 sf X $ 11.50 /sf $ 109,227.00

103,415 sf X $ 12.50 /sf $ 1,292,687.50

49Y,

DEDUCT ALT

87,361 SF x ($0.50) /SF ($43,681)

50


4" Ground Face

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 24 (4/29/10): Replace colored brick mortar as specified with standard sand mortar.

Standard mortar in-lieu of colored mortar

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 26 (4/29/10): Circular skylights change to standard pattern.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 25 (4/29/10): Fire rated glazing at large first floor mechanical room - reduce square footage by 50%.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 23 (4/29/10): Ground face/split face CMU at corridors to be replaced with factory colored CMU with a split face band.

6" Ground Face

8" Ground Face

4" Factor Colored Smooth CMU


Split Face Band

None included with the 50%DD estimate.

THIS ITEM IS THE SAME AS VE ITEM #17c. SEE VE #17c

N/A

TBD

($43,681)

($221,329)



3/12/2010


Page 17 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

52

53


55

56

TBD

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 28 (4/29/10): Remove antimicrobial spray at roofing.

This is currently not part of the 50% DD Estimate. Note that the additional cost for the Preventative Replacement Warranty costs approx $0.05/SF per year, or approx $8000/year in this case, which covers an annual inspection and minor maintenance and repairs. Note that the first year should already be covered in the one-year subcontractor warranty, right?

TBD

Need more information and the re-designed coffered ceiling drawings.

The 50% DD Estimate did not include a cost for this. We need more information. Local subcontractors are unaware of this item when we asked for guidance.

THIS ITEM IS THE SAME AS VE ITEM #17b. SEE VE #17b.

N/A

Need more information and the new re-designed Auxiliary Gym drawings.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 30 (4/29/10): Re-designed coffered ceilings at first floor Galleries.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 31 (4/29/10): Auxiliary Gym Size Reduction.

TBD

TBD

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 29 (4/29/10): Secondary coridor skylights eliminated

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 27 (4/29/10): Remove roofing preventative replacement warranty


3/12/2010


Page 18 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

57

58

59Y,

DEDUCT ALT

(522) sy X $ 25.00 /sy $ (13,055.56)

(850) sf X $ 4.80 /sf $ (4,080.00)

210 sf X $ 4.80 /sf $ 1,008.00

(280) lf X $ 33.00 /lf $ (9,240.00)

40 lf X $ 58.00 /lf $ 2,320.00

- sf X $ - /sf $ -

1,044 sy X $ 0.45 /sy $ 470.00

60 ADD ALT

3,924 sf X $ 4.00 /sf $ 15,696.00

61 ADD ALT

12,780 sf X $ 4.00 /sf $ 51,120.00

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 36 (4/29/10): Additional brick for future natatorium addition.

Additional Brick for Future natatorium addition (Quantity perdetermined by AI)

8" Curb and Gutter

Plantings

Seeding

Sidewalks Add

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 35 (4/29/10): Additional brick for future classroom addition.

Additional Brick for Future classroom addition (Quantity perdetermined by AI)

($22,578)

TBD

TBD

8" Curb

Item by AI lableled as their Alternate 33 (4/29/10): Terraced area between school and upper parking.

Sidewalks Deduct

Unit cost material only

Unit cost material only

Parking Standard Duty Paving

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 32 (4/29/10): Premium plantings

Need more information to price

Need more information to price

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 34 (4/29/10): Do not install Parking, sidewalks and Plantings at the Southwest corner of the building for future pool addition.

51,120.00$

15,696.00$


3/12/2010


Page 19 of 19

Item Ow

ner

(P

HS

D)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

Arc

h (

AI)

Acc

ept

(Y/N

)

Dat

e A

ccep

ted

SA

VIN

GS

RE

CO

MM

EN

DE

D (

$)

SA

VIN

GS

UN

DE

R S

TU

DY

($)

SA

VIN

GS

RE

JEC

TE

D (

$)

AL

TE

RN

AT

E

AL

TE

RN

AT

E V

AL

UE

ACTION REQUIRED



Scope Description

62 ADD ALT

121 ea X $ 250.00 /ea $ 30,250.00

63

9 ea X $ - /ea $ -

64

(100) ea X $ 432.50 /ea $ (43,250.00)

100 ea X $ - /ea $ -

65

66

- ea X $ - /ea $ -

50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT VALUE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ($467,808) $0 ($1,750,319) ($662,896)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 40 (4/29/10): Delete light panels in auditorium from the project and replace with standard sound absorbing panels.

Solar operated lights type S09

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 39 (4/29/10): Delete light fixture D01 from the project and replace with light fixture Dxx.

Heavy duty carriers in-lieu of standard carriers

None included with the 50%DD estimate. Need more information.

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 37 (4/29/10): Provide heavy duty toilet carriers.

These luminaes were not included in the 50% DD estimate.

Need more information. No specifications included with alternate.

Need more information and specification for the new light fixture Dxx.

Item by AI labeled as Alternate 41 (4/29/10): Delete Whiteboard luminaries from classrooms.

Whiteboard luminares (none included in 50%DD estimate)

Item by AI labeled as their Alternate 38 (4/29/10): Add (9) solar operated lights to the scope of work type S09.

Delete light fixture D01

Add new light fixture Dxx

TBD

TBD

TBD

30,250.00$

TBD

CHANGE ORDER MANAGEMENT

STATE HIGHCM RFP

Turner’s approach to Change Orders is to eliminate them when at all possible in advance of bids through our collabora ve preconstruc on process. This is done by our; 1) Constructability Reviews, 2) Development of Scopes of Work, 3) Establishing a Master Schedule, 4) Developing an effi cient site logis cs plan, 5) Requiring the u liza on of BIM for coordina on, 6) Establishing the requirements for safety, quality and coordina on mee ng in the “Front End” documents.

When Change orders do arise for any number of unavoidable reasons, Turner has processes and controls in place to an cipate them, categorize them, and provide an ini al es mate to the project team, which can ini ate discussion on cost, schedule issues and alterna ve solu ons.

For work that cannot be quan fi ed at the me of bidding, Turner will an cipate their need and establish holds amounts in the project es mates to ensure that the overall budget is not impacted. With regard to bidding the quan fi ed work, Turner will direct the bidders to include the task as a unit price add/deduct to the bid form. For example, ‘ Provide a unit price per man hour to add miscellaneous paint touch up as directed by the Construc on Manager at the end of the project’. When a task is known but the quan ty is uncertain, as in the case of asbestos removal, the bidder is instructed to include a named quan ty in the base bid; in addi on, the bid form will read ‘Provide a unit price for addi ons or dele ons to the base bid quan ty for block wall demoli on for asbestos abatement.’

For work that arises during the course of construc on, Turner will have a previously established con ngency amount for fi eld condi ons to minimize the impact to the overall project budget. With regards to controlling these changes in the fi eld, Turner includes a process for submi ng a change order in the front end documents. We request that each prime contractor submit labor and machine rates when he is awarded the contract, not as he prepares a change order. We establish the format for a change: Show quan es, unit prices, labor hours, labor rates, taxes, allowable overhead and profi t per the contract, and include invoices from suppliers as backup. For me and material work, me slips lis ng the names of the workmen must

be submi ed daily. Prompt submission of change requests with complete paperwork to enable prompt resolu on is a requisite so as not to impede or delay the work of other prime contractors.

Once the possibility of a change is known, whether Owner-ini ated or as a result of Error & Omission, Field Condi on, Code Related, or Value Engineering, we add the item to the Poten al Change Order Log with a nota on to indicate the reason. Another chart, the Construc on Cost Status, tracks a change order from incep on to payment, and is included on Board Reports and Owner-Architect-Turner Mee ng Agendas. The chart includes columns for three categories:

• “approved”, i.e. a change es mate has been executed and approved by the owner;

• “pending”, i.e. a change es mated has been submi ed and awaits approval by the owner;

• “approximate”, i.e. an approximate es mate has been developed and submi ed to the District as an early warning system for informa on and review.

Addi onal columns summarize prime contract totals, current budget and con ngency values allowing the District to monitor the current fi nancial status of the project. Turner’s mely repor ng allows for discre onary changes during construc on to keep the project on budget.

CHANGE ORDER MANAGEMENT

STATE HIGHCM RFP

When the prime contractor submits a wri en proposal in a form suitable for reasonable, accurate verifi ca on, Turner fi rst verifi es that the poten al change is a legi mate change to scope and not addressed in the contract documents. If valid, we verify the change order quan es, doing our own ‘take-off ’ for material and labor hours. We review the spreadsheet and back-up documenta on, verify the Overhead +Profi t rates from the contract, and check the math. We review any discrepancies with the contractor and request a revised CO. At mes, nego a ons are needed to arrive at a fair

and reasonable price before proceeding.

The change order request is reviewed with the Architect and District as a fi nal check before a formal recommenda on is made to the Board of School Directors. The Poten al change order moves to the Pending and later the Approved column on the Construc on Cost Status chart.

EXAMPLEK. Leroy Irvis Science Center – Community College of Allegheny College

The basis of design for Air Handling Unit #1 (AHU-1) was a diff erent manufacturer than the unit included by the low bidder. In reviewing the submi als, the design Engineer realized piping was inadvertently missed on the bid drawings. The Engineer provided a revised drawing outlining necessary piping along with an added condensate reclaim system. This reclaim system was originally a bid alternate, which had not been selected by the Owner at bid me although it represented a $15,000 per year savings. The Owner was reconsidering, so Turner requested a cost proposal for the condensate reclaim system separate from the missed piping. The Prime Contractor’s proposed change was $89,916. Upon review, Turner’s Project Manager was able to point out discrepancies and fi nalize on a price of $64,116 resul ng in a much more aff ordable change that will quickly pay for itself in energy savings.

On the a ached documents, we include a history of the discussion from the Owner-Architect-Turner (OAT) Mee ng Minutes, and ini al reports to the Owner that list the proposed cost of $89,916 for HC-06 on the PCO log, and the accompanying Construc on Cost Status Chart dated 4-20-12. The fi nal change order cost of $64,116 is shown on the corresponding documents dated 9-20-12.

3. PROJECT BUDGET

3.12.3

TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Louis F. LondinoProject Manager

Documents Distributed at Meeting 211. Sign-in Sheet 2. PCO Log Dated 3/27/123. CCS Dated 3/27/124. RFI Log Dated 3/26/125. Submittal Log Dated 3/26/12

3/27/12 - L. Londino reported that PCO HC-06 has been reviewed and submitted to the Board for approval at the April 5th meeting.

2/14/12 - L. Londino reported that he is awaiting information from Siemens through East West in order to complete the review of the COR.

12/06/11 - L. Londino reported that he has issued a request for cost proposal from East West for the condensate reclaim system so that CCAC can make an informed decision on the pay period based on the energy model. L. Londino expects to receive the cost proposal next week.

11/22/11 - L. Londino reported that he is awaiting a decision from D. Fedor on the condensate reclaim system. L. Londino stated that he has told S. Osterwise that a separate cost proposal will be initiated if CCAC decides to add the condensate reclaim system to the project.

12/20/11 - L. Londino reported that he is still waiting to receive the cost proposal from East West.

***********************************************************************************************************************************

HISTORY OF THE CHANGE HC-06 IN THE OWNER-ARCHITECT-TURNER (OAT) MEETING

MINUTES

K. Leroy Irvis Science Center Owner-Architect-Turner Meeting # 21, 3-27-12

2/28/12 - L. Londino reported that he has received the requested information from Siemens, and he will forward PCO HC-06 to J. Carthew upon completion of his review. L. Londino further stated that he wants to include the Bid Alternate price of $74, 400 as a separate line in the proposal so that all of the costs for this work scope are captured with explanation. Note that only the additional piping costs will have OH&P. The bid alternate will be added at the end so that the total cost is presented to the board.

1/03/12 - No change in status.

1/31/12 - L. Londino reported that the Owner has decided to install the condensate reclaim system in order to obtain the LEED credits. L. Londino also stated that he met with S. Osterwise to review the work scope and quantity takeoff, and he is awaiting a more detailed explanation of the Siemens controls cost proposal. Additionally, as soon as these costs are received/reviewed the COR for this PCO will be forwarded to CJL/HLA for their review.

1/17/12 - L. Londino reported that he has received the cost proposal for the condensate reclaim system and would review with S. Osterwise on 1/20/12.

L. Londino reported that CJL provided a revised drawing outlining the additional piping required for AHU #1. This revised drawing was provided to assist in the determination of costs for PCO HC-03. L. Londino further reported that he met with S. Osterwise to perform a joint take-off so that work scope and material quantities were in agreement prior to cost the revised PCO. However, during their review it was determined that the revised drawing included the additional piping needed for the Condensate Reclaim System. However, this alternate was not taken by CCAC as part of the HVAC contract. L. Londino asked J. Vizzini to attend this meeting and to discuss with D. Fedor if CCAC would like to include this alternate and the additional piping so that the additional cooling could be obtained during the operation of the AHU. D. Fedor asked J. Vizzini to provide the energy model calculations. D. Sterling suggested that a separate PCO be initiated for the condensate reclaim system as the timeframe for the bid alternate price had elapsed. Post Meeting Note - CJL provided D. Fedor with the energy model calculations on 11/09/11, and estimated that CCAC could save $15K/year by using the condensate reclaim system.

TURNER CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION MANAGER 1 OF 1 8) CCAC- OAT Mtg Min 21- 03 27 12

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY Change Order Type Codes:

K. LEROY IRVIS SCIENCE CENTER 1. Owner Request

2. Architect Request

POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER LOG 3. CM Request

(CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY) 4. Contractor Request 10.Local Gov't Agency Requirement

PCO#

CO#

CONTRREQ # Description

Proposed Amount

Potential Exposure

CO AmountType Code

Date ProposalRequested

Date Contractor Proposal

Status/Comments

BP-01: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION (L.S. BRINKER, INC.)

GC-04 Cost for work to furnish and install additional grating at the mechanical mezzanine per HLA Supplemental Drawings 238 and 240.

$5,000 1 3/30/12 S:4/13/12

GC-06 Cost for work to start backfill operations inconjunction with the PWSA 30" water line work in Mid-June 2012.

$5,000 1

Total $0 $10,000 $5,128

BP-02: PLUMBING CONSTRUCTION (SSM INDUSTRIES, INC.)

PC-03 CCAC May Board

Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install an additional valve in the 8" fire line beyond the building connection.

$4,291 4 9/2/11 1/16/12 S: 9/30/11COR submitted to CCAC 2/16/12

PC-07 Cost for work on time and material basis to replace 3" polyethylene piping, located within 20 feet of NRG steam piping, with schedule 40 wrapped steel piping.

$5,000 1 1/26/12 S: 4/06/12Work to start 4/25/12


Mtg

Credit cost proposal for the Glasswasher Drain After Cooling piping per Dwg P6.1R1 ($3,491) 1 2/20/12 COR submitted to CCAC 3/21/12


Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install trap primers at the lower level penthouse floor drains per RFI PC-024 dated 1/12/12.

$14,766 2 3/2/12 3/15/12 COR submitted to CCAC 4/18/12

PC-10 Cost for work to furnish and install the revisions as identified and requested by the Owner during review of the instructional spaces with the faculty and staff within each department in the Science Center.

$16,800 1 3/23/12 S: 4/10/12

PC-11 Cost for work to furnish and install the revised 30" waterline piping per the revised PWSA approved drawings dated 4/2/12.

$25,000 1 4/16/12 S:5/1/12

Total $15,566 $46,800 $22,238

BP-03: HVAC CONSTRUCTION (EAST WEST MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY CO., INC.)

HC-06 CCAC May Board

Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install a complete Condensate Reclaim System for AHU#1. $89,916 1 11/29/11 2/1/12 S:12/6/11COR submitted to CCAC 3/20/12


Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install a fan coil unit in the 3rd floor elevator machine room in the PE Building.

$12,189 1 2/1/12 COR submitted to CCAC 3/20/12

Total $102,105 $0 $25,768

8. Design Omission9. VE/Credits

5.Field Condition

6. Safety7. Backcharge

Monthly Budget Report #12 - April 20, 2012

akonieczka

Callout

INITIAL PROPOSED COST

akonieczka

Callout

TOTAL CARRIES TO HVAC PENDING CHANGE ON CONSTRUCITON COST STATUS CHART

K. LEROY IRVIS SCIENCE CENTER

CONSTRUCTION COST STATUS CHART - STATUS AS OF MARCH 20, 2011

Contract (Contractor)Bid

PackageContract #

Original Contract Amount

Approved Current Contract

AmountPending Approximate

Potential Contract Amount

Total Completed & Stored to Date

RetainageAmount

General Construction (L.S. Brinker, Inc.) BP-01 B0006714 $9,111,355 $5,128 $9,116,483 $0 $10,000 $9,126,483 $5,486,217 $548,622

Plumbing Construction (SSM Industries, Inc.) BP-02 B0006710 $2,134,000 $22,238 $2,156,238 $15,566 $46,800 $2,218,604 $960,699 $96,070

HVAC Construction (East West Mfg & Supply Co.) BP-03 B0006711 $2,478,100 $25,768 $2,503,868 $102,105 $2,605,973 $629,399 $62,940

Fire Protection Construction (S. A. Comunale, Inc.) BP-04 B0006720 $208,040 $0 $208,040 $0 $0 $208,040 $59,505 $5,951

Electrical Construction (Power Contracting Co.) BP-05 B0006716 $1,900,777 $8,914 $1,909,691 $18,602 $24,500 $1,952,793 $591,414 $59,141

Painting Construction (I. D. Ritter Jr. BP-06 B0006709 $127,330 $0 $127,330 $0 $0 $127,330 $0 $0

Casework Construction (Kewaunee Scientific Corp BP-07 B0006935 $925,690 $6,838 $932,528 $0 $0 $932,528 $0 $0

Carpet & Resilient Flring Construction (R & D Creations) BP-08 B0006708 $264,800 $0 $264,800 $14,750 $0 $279,550 $42,850 $4,285

Terrazzo & Ceramic Tile Construction (Colucci Tile & Marble, Inc..) BP-09 B0006727 $176,708 $0 $176,708 $0 $2,000 $178,708 $0 $0

Asphalt Paving Construction (Peter J. Caruso & Sons, Inc.) BP-10 B0006712 $124,307 $0 $124,307 $0 $0 $124,307 $0 $0

Landscaping Construction (Jupina Landscaping) BP-11 B0006934 $45,995 $0 $45,995 $0 $0 $45,995 $0 $0

Final Cleaning Construction (L. S. Brinker, Inc.) BP-12 B0006715 $109,750 $0 $109,750 $0 $0 $109,750 $0 $0

NonLab Casework Construction (Giffin Interiors) BP-13 B0007377 $166,735 $0 $166,735 $0 $0 $166,735 $0 $0

$17,773,587 $68,886 $17,842,473 $151,023 $83,300 $18,076,796 $7,770,084 $777,008

Direct Purchase - Trane AHUs DP-1 $508,076 $0 $508,076 $0 $0 $508,076 $0 $0

Direct Purchase - Cunnimgs Emergency Generator DP-2 $88,500 $0 $88,500 $0 $0 $88,500 $0 $0

Direct Purchase - Square D Switchgear DP-3 $47,400 $0 $47,400 $0 $0 $47,400 $0 $0

OTHER CONTRACT SUBTOTALS: $643,976 $0 $643,976 $0 $0 $643,976 $0 $0

OCIP $446,739 $1,731 $448,471 $3,796 $2,094 $454,360

Builder's Risk $14,519

TOTAL OCIP $461,258

CONSTRUCTION TOTALS: $18,878,821 $68,886 $18,934,920 $154,819 $85,394 $19,175,132 $7,770,084 $777,008

$1,066,415$68,886 0.36%

$997,529

$240,213

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY

Change Orders & Potential Change Orders

PRIME CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TOTALS

PaymentsThru 03 20 12

PRIME CONTRACT SUBTOTALS:

OTHER CCAC CONTRACTS

Remaining Contingency

Construction ContingencyApproved Changes

Pending and Approximate Change Orders

Monthly Report #12 - April 20, 2012

akonieczka

Oval

akonieczka

Text Box

HC-06 HC-07

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY Change Order Type Codes:

K. LEROY IRVIS SCIENCE CENTER 1. Owner Request

2. Architect Request

POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDER LOG 3. CM Request

(CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY) 4. Contractor Request 10.Local Gov't Agency Requirement

PCO#

CO#

CONTRREQ # Description

Proposed Amount

Potential Exposure

CO AmountType Code

Date ProposalRequested

Date Contractor Proposal

Status/Comments

BP-01: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION (L.S. BRINKER, INC.)

GC-04 Cost for work to furnish and install additional grating at the mechanical mezzanine per HLA Supplemental Drawings 238 and 240.

$5,000 1 3/30/12 S:4/13/12

GC-06 Cost for work to start backfill operations inconjunction with the PWSA 30" water line work in Mid-June 2012.

$5,000 1

Total $0 $10,000 $5,128

BP-02: PLUMBING CONSTRUCTION (SSM INDUSTRIES, INC.)


Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install an additional valve in the 8" fire line beyond the building connection.

$4,291 4 9/2/11 1/16/12 S: 9/30/11COR submitted to CCAC 2/16/12

PC-07 Cost for work on time and material basis to replace 3" polyethylene piping, located within 20 feet of NRG steam piping, with schedule 40 wrapped steel piping.

$5,000 1 1/26/12 S: 4/06/12Work to start 4/25/12


Mtg

Credit cost proposal for the Glasswasher Drain After Cooling piping per Dwg P6.1R1 ($3,491) 1 2/20/12 COR submitted to CCAC 3/21/12


Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install trap primers at the lower level penthouse floor drains per RFI PC-024 dated 1/12/12.

$14,766 2 3/2/12 3/15/12 COR submitted to CCAC 4/18/12

PC-10 Cost for work to furnish and install the revisions as identified and requested by the Owner during review of the instructional spaces with the faculty and staff within each department in the Science Center.

$16,800 1 3/23/12 S: 4/10/12

PC-11 Cost for work to furnish and install the revised 30" waterline piping per the revised PWSA approved drawings dated 4/2/12.

$25,000 1 4/16/12 S:5/1/12

Total $15,566 $46,800 $22,238

BP-03: HVAC CONSTRUCTION (EAST WEST MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY CO., INC.)


Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install a complete Condensate Reclaim System for AHU#1. $89,916 1 11/29/11 2/1/12 S:12/6/11COR submitted to CCAC 3/20/12


Mtg

Cost for work to furnish and install a fan coil unit in the 3rd floor elevator machine room in the PE Building.

$12,189 1 2/1/12 COR submitted to CCAC 3/20/12

Total $102,105 $0 $25,768

8. Design Omission9. VE/Credits

5.Field Condition

6. Safety7. Backcharge

Monthly Budget Report #12 - April 20, 2012

akonieczka

Callout

INITIAL PROPOSED COST

akonieczka

Callout

TOTAL CARRIES TO HVAC PENDING CHANGE ON CONSTRUCITON COST STATUS CHART

K. LEROY IRVIS SCIENCE CENTER

CONSTRUCTION COST STATUS CHART - STATUS AS OF MARCH 20, 2011

Contract (Contractor)Bid

PackageContract #

Original Contract Amount

Approved Current Contract

AmountPending Approximate

Potential Contract Amount

Total Completed & Stored to Date

RetainageAmount

General Construction (L.S. Brinker, Inc.) BP-01 B0006714 $9,111,355 $5,128 $9,116,483 $0 $10,000 $9,126,483 $5,486,217 $548,622

Plumbing Construction (SSM Industries, Inc.) BP-02 B0006710 $2,134,000 $22,238 $2,156,238 $15,566 $46,800 $2,218,604 $960,699 $96,070

HVAC Construction (East West Mfg & Supply Co.) BP-03 B0006711 $2,478,100 $25,768 $2,503,868 $102,105 $2,605,973 $629,399 $62,940

Fire Protection Construction (S. A. Comunale, Inc.) BP-04 B0006720 $208,040 $0 $208,040 $0 $0 $208,040 $59,505 $5,951

Electrical Construction (Power Contracting Co.) BP-05 B0006716 $1,900,777 $8,914 $1,909,691 $18,602 $24,500 $1,952,793 $591,414 $59,141

Painting Construction (I. D. Ritter Jr. BP-06 B0006709 $127,330 $0 $127,330 $0 $0 $127,330 $0 $0

Casework Construction (Kewaunee Scientific Corp BP-07 B0006935 $925,690 $6,838 $932,528 $0 $0 $932,528 $0 $0

Carpet & Resilient Flring Construction (R & D Creations) BP-08 B0006708 $264,800 $0 $264,800 $14,750 $0 $279,550 $42,850 $4,285

Terrazzo & Ceramic Tile Construction (Colucci Tile & Marble, Inc..) BP-09 B0006727 $176,708 $0 $176,708 $0 $2,000 $178,708 $0 $0

Asphalt Paving Construction (Peter J. Caruso & Sons, Inc.) BP-10 B0006712 $124,307 $0 $124,307 $0 $0 $124,307 $0 $0

Landscaping Construction (Jupina Landscaping) BP-11 B0006934 $45,995 $0 $45,995 $0 $0 $45,995 $0 $0

Final Cleaning Construction (L. S. Brinker, Inc.) BP-12 B0006715 $109,750 $0 $109,750 $0 $0 $109,750 $0 $0

NonLab Casework Construction (Giffin Interiors) BP-13 B0007377 $166,735 $0 $166,735 $0 $0 $166,735 $0 $0

$17,773,587 $68,886 $17,842,473 $151,023 $83,300 $18,076,796 $7,770,084 $777,008

Direct Purchase - Trane AHUs DP-1 $508,076 $0 $508,076 $0 $0 $508,076 $0 $0

Direct Purchase - Cunnimgs Emergency Generator DP-2 $88,500 $0 $88,500 $0 $0 $88,500 $0 $0

Direct Purchase - Square D Switchgear DP-3 $47,400 $0 $47,400 $0 $0 $47,400 $0 $0

OTHER CONTRACT SUBTOTALS: $643,976 $0 $643,976 $0 $0 $643,976 $0 $0

OCIP $446,739 $1,731 $448,471 $3,796 $2,094 $454,360

Builder's Risk $14,519

TOTAL OCIP $461,258

CONSTRUCTION TOTALS: $18,878,821 $68,886 $18,934,920 $154,819 $85,394 $19,175,132 $7,770,084 $777,008

$1,066,415$68,886 0.36%

$997,529

$240,213

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY

Change Orders & Potential Change Orders

PRIME CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TOTALS

PaymentsThru 03 20 12

PRIME CONTRACT SUBTOTALS:

OTHER CCAC CONTRACTS

Remaining Contingency

Construction ContingencyApproved Changes

Pending and Approximate Change Orders

Monthly Report #12 - April 20, 2012

akonieczka

Oval

akonieczka

Text Box

HC-06 HC-07

SIMILAR PROJECT EXPERIENCE

STATE HIGHCM RFP

REPORT CARD

Notes: Managed construc on parking, access and laydown area without impac ng ongoing educa onal ac vi es.

Extra Credit: Exceeded MBE/WBE goals. Managed Owner changes to academic spaces based on reviews by department heads and staff within the original schedule.

Opportuni es for Improvement: Have more user intera on with the designers in advance of the design fi naliza on.

Budget ASchedule ACustomer Requirements A+

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY K. LEROY IRVIS SCIENCE CENTER

Turner was the Construc on Manager for the new K. Leroy Irvis Science Center for CCAC, which is a new fi ve-story, 68,000 sq. . building on CCAC’s Allegheny Campus. The building houses microbiology labs, biology labs, geology labs, physics labs, mul media labs, and chemistry labs along with state of the art classrooms and faculty offi ces.

Turner managed 13 prime contracts on a ght site in the middle of CCAC’s ac ve campus. Construc on was completed in 18 months.

Project Data:

OwnerCCACDonald Fedor, Project Manager412-237-3044 [email protected]

Construc on value$22M

Services renderedConstruc on Management Agency

Architect for this projectHayes Large Architects

Related Staff Lou Londino - Project EngineerKris ne Retetagos - Precon ManagerPhil Corrie - Asst. Superintendent


STATE HIGHCM RFP

REPORT CARDSENECA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION

Turner provided preconstruc on and construc on management services for the Senior High School addi ons that included a 3-story, 40,000-sq. . wing housing 12 classrooms and physics labs; a 2,000-sq. . expansion to the exis ng cafeteria; and a 2,000-sq. . addi on to house the SVTV studio. Renova ons to the kitchen, guidance area and special educa on classrooms, and e-ins of the mechanical systems were also included in the scope of work.

Project Data:

OwnerSeneca Valley School DistrictMr. Mark Korcinsky, Principal, Superintendent724-452-6041



Architect for this projectEckles Architecture

Related Staff Adam Hinds- Project Superintendent

Notes: Fast closeout with zero subcontractor claims. Undisturbed school opera ons and a seamless transi on to new spaces.

Extra Credit: Work took place in the center of an ac ve school campus while crea ng minimal impact.

Opportuni es for Improvement: Since the fi nal cost with change orders was 9% less than the budget, opportuni es for addi onal scope existed. Re-visit the es mate and bidding climate to improve es ma ng on future projects.

Budget A+Schedule ACustomer Requirements A


STATE HIGHCM RFP

REPORT CARD

Notes: Owner had scheduled a full season of ac vi es from hockey to basketball to gradua on events and concerts in order to generate necessary revenue. Only summers provided 100% access for construc on.

Extra Credit: Enough savings were achieved by limi ng change orders that ameni es such as new sea ng were added. Turner incorporated $6 in changes and addi ons without any schedule extension. No spor ng events or concerts were delayed or re-scheduled.

Opportuni es for Improvement: Since the North end of the Arena was open to the elements for the winter, a tarp was hung as a barrier to the elements. A temporary wall would have provided more protec on to the patrons and the cost should be incorporated in future projects of this nature.

Budget ASchedule ACustomer Requirements A+

ERIE INSURANCE ARENA EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS

Turner provided construc on management services for the Erie Insurance Arena (formerly the Tullio Arena) 80,000 sq. . expansion and 120,000 sq. . renova on which took place in four phases while the Arena remained

fully opera onal. The project also involved signifi cant demoli on. Turner provided preconstruc on and construc on services for the project and managed ten prime contractors.

The construc on/renova on included numerous design improvements, with the most signifi cant being the addi on of arena sea ng and circula on areas. To allow for these new areas, the exis ng arena was expanded from 152,000 sq. . to a total area of 218,000 sq. . New sea ng capaci es increased to 6,500 for hockey, 6,750 for basketball and nearly 9,000 for concerts.

The project also included larger lobby spaces, expanded concourses with restroom and concession areas, addi onal cke ng box offi ces, private suites, club ameni es, administra ve offi ces, mechanical rooms, training areas, new locker rooms and a team store. On the exterior, the arena underwent a complete faceli and looks like a brand new building.

Project Data:

OwnerPennsylvania Department of General Services

Owner’s representa ve and phone numberJohn A. “Casey” Wells, Execu ve Director, Erie County Conven on Center Authority814-453-7117



Architect for this projectFriday/Sink Combs Dethlefs Joint Venture Associates

Related Staff Kris ne Retetagos - Precon ManagerPhil Corrie - Asst. Superintendent


STATE HIGHCM RFP

REPORT CARD

Notes: The en re project took place in, around, and connected to the exis ng hospital.

Extra Credit: Although not a requirement of the Owner, Turner implemented BIM on the project to greatly reduce fi eld change orders and to allow for signifi cant off site prefabrica on.

Opportuni es for Improvement: Exis ng u lity records for underground services were not en rely accurate. Invest the cost in obtaining an independent u lity surveyor.

Budget ASchedule ACustomer Requirements A

BUTLER HOSPITAL NEW INPATIENT TOWER

Turner provided preconstruc on and construc on services for this new seven-story, 214,000 square foot inpa ent tower, which houses state-of-the-art opera ng and recovery rooms as well as intensive care units. The new entrance including a grand atrium, two stories high, is capped off by a full length triangular skylight in order to greet visitors. A new grand stairway connects the new atrium entrance fl oor to the original entrance lobby.

The new hospital houses 24-bed cri cal care unit, a 10-room surgical suite and 52 addi onal medical-surgical beds, nursing, diagnos c/ treatment, support services, administra on spaces, educa on and conference facili es and retail space.

Under a separate phase, Turner constructed a new access road and traffi c light off of Rt. 68, which accesses the main entrance.

Building Informa on Modeling (BIM) was u lized on this project for MEP coordina on and 4D-scheduling, which greatly enhanced produc vity.

Project Data:

OwnerButler Health Systems Kevin M. Stansbury FACHESr. Partner & Execu ve Vice President at Global Health Services Network, LLC724-290-0499


Services renderedConstruc on Management

Architect for this projectThe Design Group / Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc.

Related Staff Kurt Johnson - Project ManagerKris ne Retetagos - Precon Manager


STATE HIGHCM RFP

REPORT CARD

Notes: This was Turner’s second project for the school district based on a proven track record on the previous project.

Extra Credit: Final Cost including Change Orders were 0.3% below CD es mates. The rela onship between the District and the Township was enhanced when Turner suggested the required re-paving by the District of the adjacent township road be accomplished by an alternate bid on the Township’s yearly roadwork bidding, to be paid for by the District. This eliminated the District hiring a designer and bidding outright, and gave the Township the assurance that their specifi ca ons were met.

Opportuni es for Improvement: The General Trades contractor did not understand the concept or the importance of the natural, na ve habitat landscaping specifi ed for the project. This would have been be er controlled through a direct prime contract with a landscaper experienced in natural landscaping.

Budget A+Schedule ACustomer Requirements A

PINE RICHLAND EDEN HALL UPPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

The Upper Elementary was built on a 32 acre green-fi eld site and includes the extension of u li es and reconfi gura on of an exis ng intersec on. Built for grades 4 through 6, the building contains 190,000-sq. ., and accommodates 1200 students. The school is divided into two wings with a library and large group ac vity center connec ng the two wings. Each wing includes space for special educa on classrooms, computer labs, and other support services. The large group instruc on area contains retractable sea ng to allow fl exibility for assemblies and performances. The cafeteria includes a full service kitchen and the ea ng area provides egress to the playground. Site ameni es include a soccer fi eld, designated bus parking and parent pick up.

Turner managed 9 prime contractors during construc on, and brought the project in on me and under budget.

Project Data:

OwnerPine-Richland School DistrictMs. Dana Siford, Director of Financial & Opera onal Services 724-625-7773 [email protected]



Architect for this projectEckles Architecture

Related Staff Lou Londino - Project EngineerKris ne Retetagos - Precon Manager

state

FEE PROPOSAL

STATE HIGH CM RFP

A. Please indicate your fixed fee for this project. The fee will be all inclusive for services from schematic development through project closeout, including but not limited to all staff related travel and housing. Preconstruction Fee $256,117 Construction Fee $2,553,216 Reimbursables $410,968 Total Fixed Fee $3,220,301

B. Please list a per‐meeting fee for “other” meetings. (All direct, project related meetings are included in the base fee, regardless of number required).Per‐Meeting Fee for “other” meetings: $1,200 per meeting

C. List any additional services or costs that could be incurred, including reimbursable expenses and

include a fee schedule. (11.4: All indirect costs will be billed 1X, that is, no mark‐up).

No additional services are anticipated.

D. Please indicate a plus/minus adjustment for each month deviation from the project September 2018 completion date.

$52,000/month for adjustments to the project completion date of September 2018.

Turner Construction CompanyTwo PNC Plaza

620 Liberty Avenue, 27th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15222

P:412.255.5400www.turnerconstruction.com