26
Standardizing scholarly output Melissa Haendel [email protected] @ ontowonka VIVO 2014 Austin

Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presented as part of a panel discussion on implementing VIVO and use of the ontology.

Citation preview

Page 1: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Standardizing scholarly output

Melissa [email protected]

@ontowonka

VIVO 2014Austin

Page 2: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

The Research Life Cycle

EXPERIMENT

COLLABORATE

PUBLISHDEPOSIT DATA

FUND

Page 3: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

The Research Life Cycle: Funding

EXPERIMENT

COLLABORATE

PUBLISHDEPOSIT DATA

FUND

FundRef

NIH Reporter

ScienCV

Biosketches

Page 4: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

The Research Life Cycle: Experiment

EXPERIMENT

COLLABORATE

PUBLISHDEPOSIT DATA

FUND

Page 5: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

The Research Life Cycle: Collaborate

EXPERIMENT

COLLABORATE

PUBLISHDEPOSIT DATA

FUND

Expertise

SciTS

Mentoring

Research trending

Page 6: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

The Research Life Cycle: Publish

EXPERIMENT

COLLABORATE

PUBLISHDEPOSIT DATA

FUND

Universitypublishers

Blogs

Page 7: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

The Research Life Cycle: Deposit Data

EXPERIMENT

COLLABORATE

PUBLISHDEPOSIT DATA

FUND

Data repositories

Metadata

Page 8: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

The Research Life Cycle

EXPERIMENT

COLLABORATE

PUBLISHDEPOSIT DATA

FUND

VIVO-ISF

Page 9: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Goal:

Create a semantic representation of scholarly activities and products that would enable identification of potential collaborators, relevant resources, and expertise across scientific disciplines

n et w o r k

Page 10: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

VIVO-ISF Content and modularization

eagle-iResearch resources

VIVOPerson profiling

CTSA ShareCenterDiscussions, requests,

share documents

VIVO-ISF

PersonContact

OrganizationsAffiliations

RolesEventsServices

Clinical Expertise

ReagentsOrganisms

Credentials

Page 11: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Inclusion or referencing of domain-specific vocabularies in VIVO-ISF

Either utilize external services with stable URIs (e.g. UMLS) or import classes/instances

Page 12: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

VIVO-ISF for data integration

The Research Life Cycle: Funding

Three harmonization stories

‘s data

Page 13: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Integrating clinical and basic research expertise data

The Research Life Cycle: Funding

Most collaboration suggestion tools are based on publication and sometimes awarded grant data.

But this often misses clinician collaborators who don’t publish or write grants much

Page 14: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Collecting and publishing expertise by connecting clinical and and research

activities and resources

Step 1Aggregate

Data

Step 2Map Data to

ISF

Step 4Publish Linked

Data

Step 3Compute Expertise

Page 15: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Step 1Aggregate

Clinical Data

Step 2Map Data to

ISF

Step 4Publish Linked

Data

Step 3Compute Expertise

Provider ID ICD Code Value Code CountUnique Patient

Count Code Label

1234567 552.00 1 1Unilateral or unspecified femoral hernia with obstruction (ICD9CM

552.00)

1234567 553.02 8 6Bilateral femoral hernia without

mention of obstruction or gangrene (ICD9CM 553.02)

1234567 555.1 4 1Regional enteritis of large intestine

(ICD9CM 555.1)

1234568 745.12 10 5Corrected transposition of great

vessels (ICD9CM 745.12)

Aggregate data

Page 16: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Step 1Aggregate

Clinical Data

Step 2Map Data to

VIVO-ISF

Step 4Publish Linked

Data

Step 3Compute Expertise

Provider ID ICD Code ValueCode Count

UniquePatient Count Code Label

1234567 552.00 1 1

Unilateral or unspecified femoral

hernia with obstruction (ICD9CM 552.00)

1234567 553.02 8 6

Bilateral femoral hernia without mention of

obstruction or gangrene (ICD9CM 553.02)

1234567 555.1 4 1Regional enteritis of

large intestine (ICD9CM 555.1)

1234568 745.12 10 5Corrected transposition

of great vessels (ICD9CM 745.12)

AggregatedClinical Data

VIVO-ISF

RDFtriples

Java scriptsOWL API

Map Data to VIVO-ISF

Page 17: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Step 1Aggregate

Clinical Data

Step 2Map Data to

ISF

Step 4Publish Linked

Data

Step 3Compute Expertise

Compute Expertise

Page 18: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Step 1Aggregate

Clinical Data

Step 2Map Data to

ISF

Step 4Publish Linked

Data

Step 3Compute Expertise

Linked Data cloud

SPA

RQ

LEn

dp

oin

tsO

the

r A

PIs

Triple StoresSeveral means to access and

query data

Publish Linked data

Page 19: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Integrating public and private research profile data

The Research Life Cycle: Funding

Most collaboration suggestion tools are based on publication and sometimes awarded grant data.

But this is old news for Research Administration who wants to plan for what is happening at their institution NOW.

=> Clinical and Translational Activity Reporting tool (CTAR)

Page 20: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Clinical and Translational Activity Reporting tool

The Research Life Cycle: Funding

Funding proposals

Grants & awards

Publications People InstitutionsIRBprotocols

Page 21: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Clinical and Translational Activity Reporting tool

The Research Life Cycle: Funding

See Robin Champieux and our poster entitled:

Page 22: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Ferrets Ontology

FerretsOROntology

=> At inter-institutional level can see interaction between previously unconnected groups via intervening persons/groups at another institution

Integrating research data across institutions

David Eichmannhttp://research.icts.uiowa.edu/polyglot/

Page 23: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Integrating data from 40+ institutionsVIVO, SciVal, LOKI, Profiles, etc.

Mapping all the classes and properties to VIVO-ISF and making the integrated data set available

Classes from:VIVO sites: 480 unique classesProfile sites: 31 unique classes

Domains:vivoweb.orgpurl.orgwww.w3.org xmlns.comwww.findanexpert.unimelb.edu.auvivo.libr.tue.nlpurl.obolibrary.orggriffith.edu.au

Etc.....

Integrating research data across institutions

Mapping predicateshttp://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#hasSubjectArea

8455029http://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#authorInAuthorship

1444239http://orng.info/ontology/orng#hasYouTube

402

Also helps us understand what extensions exist that should be implmeneted centrally

Page 24: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Integrating data from different profiling systems

The Research Life Cycle: Funding

What kinds of questions can we answer?

Who in the southeast has expertise in sleep and does work on mice?

How much collaboration goes on intra versus inter-institutionally based upon all scholarly activities and products?

How can we identify external advisors for an interdisciplinary training program?

What gaps exist in research funding topics across institutions that an institutions may have expertise in?

@ontowonka #vivoisf – tweet me your ideas

Page 25: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

We can profile people based on the diversity of their activities and products of research

VIVO-ISF can be used as a standard to integrate research profiling and scholarly contributions across different domains, sources, and systems

Applications such as VIVO, eagle-i, LOKI, Profiles, SciVal/Pure, Symplectic, and ScienCV can exchange data using VIVO-ISF

Realizing these goals is the result of wide community participation and feedback (THANK YOU!)

And… the moral(s) of the stories are:

Page 26: Standardizing scholarly output with the VIVO ontology

Working with others

We have an opportunity to engage other communities. Some new activities:

HCLS W3C dataset working group working to describe roles and relationships between people and data (e.g. producer, curator, maintainer, analysis, etc.)

CASRAI-XI contributor roles WG defining roles for people on publications

Converis and CASRAI effort to evaluate how to best use VIVO-ISF to aid CV creation and provide content back to the institutions (and beyond).

ScienCV data model alignment to support data integration

Integration of research data with biological data in the Monarch Initiative and the Neuroscience Information Framework

What are some other opportunities for VIVO-ISF to aid data integration?