32
ENERGY ASSESSMENTS FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED INDUSTRIES IN OHIO Srikar Velagapudi Ashok Kumar Alex Spivak Matthew Franchetti The University of Toledo

Srikar Velagapudi Ashok Kumar Alex Spivak Matthew Franchetti The University of Toledo

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Srikar Velagapudi Ashok Kumar Alex Spivak Matthew Franchetti The University of Toledo
  • Slide 2
  • Approaches and Components P2 approaches towards the small and medium size organizations: knowledge based easily trainable uncomplicated low budget tools Essential components: ability to carry out quick and effective assessments minimal training requirements
  • Slide 3
  • Energy Assessment A procedure to assess the power consumption with respect to each source. Basic steps: 1. Determining the amount of energy being consumed for each process/activity. 2. Determining the scope for energy savings and the cost it takes to implement the activities.
  • Slide 4
  • Energy Efficiency Efficient use of energy to obtain desired outputs that involves using alternative technologies operating at lower energy inputs for same purpose.
  • Slide 5
  • Opportunities to Reduce Energy Consumption Improper selection of optimal systems Inadequate maintenance of energy using systems Lack of understanding of energy costs
  • Slide 6
  • Classification of Energy Assessment Tools Motor Systems MotorMaster version 4.0.6 Energy Consumption Assessment Energy Assessment Spreadsheet (EAS) Plant Energy Profiler for the Chemical Industry (ChemPEP Tool) EnVinta One-2-five Building Sustainability Tool Virtual Grower HVAC Systems Hybrid HVAC System Design Tool 1.0 Building Advice Fan System Assessment Tool (FSAT) Combined Heat & Power Application Tool (CHP) Process Heating Assessment & Survey Tool (PHSAT) version 2.0
  • Slide 7
  • Classification of Tools (contd.) Related HVAC Systems Chilled Water System Analysis Tool (CWSAT) version 2.3 Steam Systems Pumping system assessment tool (PSAT) Air Master+ version 1.2.0 Emission Calculations NO x and Energy Assessment Tool (N x EAT) Emissions Reduction Calculator DOE (EIA site) Pollution Prevention Green House Gas Calculator (P2 GHG Calculator by EPA) Sustainability Tools LEED BASIX ENVEST EIOLCA Building Sustainability Tool
  • Slide 8
  • Energy Assessment Tools 1) Energy Assessment Spreadsheet: UT 2) P2 GHG Calculator and P2 Cost Calculator: EPA 3) EIO-LCA: NSF, EPA, and the Green Design Consortium 4) Hybrid HVAC System Design Spreadsheet 3) Building Sustainability Tool 4) EnVinta One-2-five: ODOD 5) MotorMaster: DOE
  • Slide 9
  • Energy Assessment Spreadsheet (EAS 1.0) Provides a complete break-up and summaries of the total annual energy consumption and cost. Helps in identifying avenues for energy and cost savings. Includes separate sections for the major areas of energy consumption lighting, motors, and HVAC systems.
  • Slide 10
  • EAS 1.0 Lighting section has three worksheets Lighting Data, Lighting Cost, and Lighting Cost Reductions. Motors section has two worksheets Motors and Motor Operating Cost. HVAC systems section has two worksheets HVAC systems and HVAC systems operating cost.
  • Slide 11
  • Lighting in EAS 1.0 Lighting Data Lighting Cost Lighting Reduction
  • Slide 12
  • Motors in EAS 1.0 Motors worksheet Motors operating cost worksheet
  • Slide 13
  • P2 Tools P2 GHG Calculator: The GHG Calculator is a tool to calculate changes in GHG emissions from P2 projects. Converts the activity values entered (e.g., kWh saved, gal. water reduced, etc.) to CO2e Aggregates GHG reductions from individual projects and categories Addresses: Electricity Conservation, Green Energy, Greening Chemistry, Water Conservation P2 Cost Calculator Calculates the financial dollar savings from implementing a P2 activity New capacity for end users to enter in OWN unit cost per project, and different costs per project. Addresses: Hazardous Inputs and Wastes, Air Emissions, Water Pollution, Water Use, Energy, Electricity, Non-Hazardous Inputs and Solid Waste
  • Slide 14
  • P2 GHG Calculator P2 Cost Calculator
  • Slide 15
  • EIO-LCA EIO-LCA is an internet based tool that estimates the materials and energy resources required for, and the environmental emissions resulting from all activities associated with a product or process. It evaluates the environmental impacts of a product or process over its entire life cycle. It also analyzes the total emissions during a life cycle based on the information from industrial transactions.
  • Slide 16
  • EIO-LCA While performing a LCA, the user needs to choose an appropriate model, industry and sector, monetary amount for the chosen sector, and category of results to obtain as an output from the tool.
  • Slide 17
  • EIO-LCA Example
  • Slide 18
  • MotorMaster The U.S DOE MotorMaster helps to analyze motor and motor system efficiency for all the motors in a plant and suggest replacements for less energy efficient units. The program generates a payback period for the motors to replace existing motors with more efficient motors.
  • Slide 19
  • MotorMaster
  • Slide 20
  • Case Study 1 Areas Investigated Lighting Motors HVAC systems Water heaters P2 Tools used Energy Assessment Spreadsheet HVAC Checklist Emission Reduction Calculator MotorMaster
  • Slide 21
  • Avenues for Reducing Energy Consumption CO 2 reduction (lbs/year) SO 2 reduction (lbs/year) NO x reduction (lbs/year) 1469718187216300
  • Slide 22
  • Case Study 2 Areas Investigated Lighting P2 Tools used Energy Assessment Spreadsheet P2 GHG Calculator P2 Cost Calculator EIO-LCA Tool
  • Slide 23
  • Savings the Facility can Attain Savings using Energy Assessment Spreadsheet Fixture Type Current Fixtures Annual Cost Savings Opportunity Recommended Fixtures Annual Cost % Reduction in Cost Annual Savings A12516.25Reduced Wattage2503.2580.0010013.00 B5329.5Reduced Wattage1065.980.004263.60 C1755.6Reduced Wattage1228.9230.00526.68 D897.13Reduced Wattage738.8217.65158.31 E777.48Reduced Wattage680.312.5097.18 Total21275.96 6217.1970.7715058.77
  • Slide 24
  • Savings the Facility can Attain Savings from EIO-LCA Tool FactorSavings Greenhouse gases (metric tons of CO 2 e)141 Energy (terajoules)1.68 Hazardous waste generation (short tons)1890 Savings from P2 GHG Calculator Project NameState or U.S. Electricity Conserved (Input value) Unit reported Electricity Conserved (kWh) GHG Reduction (MTCO 2 e) Facility NameOH158,514kWh158,514.00141.24 Savings from P2 Cost Calculator Project Name Electricity Conserved Unit (select) Unit Cost ($/unit just selected) kWh ReducedDollar Savings Facility Name158,514kWh$ 0.0950158,514.0015,138.09
  • Slide 25
  • Facilities XY and BC The facility XY has grown to a position of world leader in glass fiberization from the day of its establishment. The corporations glass fiber materials can be found in over 40,000 end-use applications ranging from computer to automobiles, snow skis and aircraft. The facility BC is a global leader in electrical components and systems for power quality, distribution, and control which sells products to customers in more than 150 countries.
  • Slide 26
  • Details of Original and Replacement Fixtures Facility Fixture Type Original Fixture Details Original Wattage Replacement Fixture Details Replacement Wattage Quantity Operating Hours per Year Facility BC A U Shaped Premium Lights Fluorescent Lamps FB40T12 40 Energy star Fluorescent 30 746050 B4' F40T1240 Energy star Fluorescent 30 55163000 C4' F32T832 Energy star Fluorescent 23 63000 D U Shaped Premium Lights Fluorescent Lamps FB40T12 40 Energy star Fluorescent 30 223000 E135 watt Incandesant135 Energy star Fluorescent 30 76000 F4' F32T832 Energy star Fluorescent 23 289000 G4' F40T1240 Energy star Fluorescent 30 22430000 H8' F-96T1260 Energy star Fluorescent 36 22824000 I4' F32T832 Energy star Fluorescent 23 2612000 J135 watt Incandesant135 Energy star Fluorescent 30 365000 K4' F40T1240 Energy star Fluorescent 30 183000 Facility XY LMP50/U/MED - SYL #6458750 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 30 162500 M 90W par 38 Halogen FL90 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 23 2132500 N 50MR1650 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 18 392500 O 75MR1675 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 13 62500 P Q100DC100 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 23 342500 Q 50 Par 2050 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 13 152500 R 50 par 3050 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 13 262500 S 150W - RS150 Energy star T5 Fluorescent 30 442500 T 75W - RS75 Energy star T5 Fluorescent18 252500
  • Slide 27
  • LIGHTING COST FOR ORIGINAL FIXTURES Enter Cost of Energy per kWh = $0.1/kWh Fixture TypeABCDEFGHIJKLM NOPQRST Wattage40 324013532406032135405090 507510050 15075 Quantity7455162272822422826361816213 3963415264425 Total Wattage296022040192880945896896013680832486072080019170 19504503400750130066001875 Total Hours / Year6050630003000 60009000300002400012000500030002500 kWh / Year1790813885205762640567080642688003283209984243002160200047925 48751125850018753250165004688 Cost / Year1701.26131909.454.72250.8538.65766.082553631190.4948.482308.5205.21904552.88 463.1106.9807.5178.1308.751567.5445 Facility BC (A K) Facility XY (L T) Total kW / Year =57 Total kW / Year =36 Total kWh / Year =2056942 Total kWh / Year =90738 Total Cost / Year = $195409.49 Total Cost / Year = $8620.06
  • Slide 28
  • LIGHTING COST FOR REPLACEMENT FIXTURES Enter Cost of Energy per kWh = $0.1/kWh Fixture TypeABCDEFGHIJKLMNO PQRST Wattage30 2330 2330362330 231813 2313 3018 Quantity7455162272822422826361816213396 3415264425 Total Wattage222016530138660210644672082085981080540480489970278 7821953381320450 Total Hours / Year6050630003000 60009000300002400012000500030002500 kWh / Year1343110413904141980126057962016001969927176540016201200122481755195 195548884533001125 Cost / Year1275.9598932.139.33188.1119.7550.61915218714.2681.7513153.91141163.5166.718.5 185.746.380.3313.5106.9 Facility BC (A K) Facility XY (L T) Total kW / Year =38 Total kW / Year =9 Total kWh / Year =1477059 Total kWh / Year =23110 Total Cost / Year = $140320.61 Total Cost / Year = $2195.5
  • Slide 29
  • Annual Savings for each Fixture in Facilities MM and LL Facility Fixture Type Current Fixtures Annual Cost ($) Savings Opportunity Recommended Fixtures Annual Cost ($) % Reduction in Cost Annual Savings ($) Facility BC" A1,701.26Reduced Wattage1,275.9525.00425.32 B131,909.40Reduced Wattage98,932.0525.0032,977.35 C54.72Reduced Wattage39.3328.1315.39 D250.80Reduced Wattage188.1025.0062.70 E538.65Reduced Wattage119.7077.78418.95 F766.08Reduced Wattage550.6228.13215.46 G25,536.00Reduced Wattage19,152.0025.006,384.00 H31,190.40Reduced Wattage18,714.2440.0012,476.16 I948.48Reduced Wattage681.7228.13266.76 J2,308.50Reduced Wattage513.0077.781,795.50 K205.20Reduced Wattage153.9025.0051.30 Total195,409.49 140,320.6128.1955,088.89 Facility XY" L190.00Reduced Wattage114.0040.0076.00 M4,552.88Reduced Wattage1,163.5174.443,389.37 N463.13Reduced Wattage166.7364.00296.41 O106.88Reduced Wattage18.5382.6788.36 P807.50Reduced Wattage185.7377.00621.78 Q178.13Reduced Wattage46.3174.00131.82 R308.75Reduced Wattage80.2874.00228.48 S1,567.50Reduced Wattage313.5080.001,254.00 T445.31Reduced Wattage106.8776.00338.44 Total8,620.08 2,195.4574.536,424.64
  • Slide 30
  • Comparison of P2 GHG Tool Results for Facilities MM and LL Facility State or U.S. (Select) Electricity Conserved (Input value) Unit Reported (Select) Electricity Conserved (kWh) GHG Reduction (MTCO2e) BCOhio579,883.00kWh579,883492.823 XYOhio67,628.00kWh67,62857.475 Comparison of P2 Cost Calculator Results for Facilities MM and LL Facility Electricity Conserved Unit (select) Unit Cost ($/unit just selected) kWh ReducedDollar Savings BC579,883.00kWh$0.1000579,883.00$ 55,088.89 XY67,628.00kWh$0.100067.628.00$ 6,877.77 EIO LCA Results for Facilities MM and LL FacilityFixture Type Greenhouse Gases (Total metric tons of CO2e) Energy (terajoules) Hazardous Waste Generation (short tons) Facility BC" Existing Fixture ($195,409.49) 1,83021.824,500 Energy Star Fixture ($140,320.61) 1,30015.517,400 Facility XY" Existing Fixture ($8,620.08)80.70.961,080 Energy Star Fixture ($2,195.45) 20.60.24275
  • Slide 31
  • Observations There is a reduction of 67,628 kWh of electricity usage at facility XY compared to 579,883 kWh at facility BC. It was observed that there is an annual savings of nearly $6,500 for the facility XY when compared to over $55,000 of facility BC. The EIOLCA results indicate that the reduction in GHG at facility XY is 60.1 metric tons of CO 2 e while it is 530 metric tons of CO 2 e at facility BC. Even though the quantities are higher for each criteria at facility BC when compared to facility XY, the percentage reduction at facility BC for all the criteria is nearly 30% while it is approximately 75% at facility XY.
  • Slide 32
  • Conclusion $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Energy assessment tools are available online for both residential and industrial sectors. It is possible to reduce energy costs. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$