17
FINGERPRINT ENHANCEMENT BY DIRECTIONAL FILTERING Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

FINGERPRINT ENHANCEMENT

BY DIRECTIONAL FILTERING

Sreya Chakraborty

Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao

Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL)University of Texas at Arlington

Page 2: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

CONTENTS Introduction Flowchart Normalization Orientation Gabor filtering Result

Page 3: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

A fingerprint image with marked singularities, minutiae and the frequency spectra corresponding to the local regions.[1]

Page 4: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Automatic Fingerprint Recognition System relies on the input fingerprint for feature extraction. Hence, the effectiveness of feature extraction relies heavily on the quality of input fingerprint images. In this paper adaptive filtering in frequency domain in order to enhance fingerprint image is proposed.

Several stages of processing take place when an Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) is used to match an unknown fingerprint.[2]

Page 5: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

A flowchart of the proposed fingerprint enhancement algorithm [3]

Page 6: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Normalized image [7]

The main purpose of normalization is :1) To have images with similar characteristics2) To remove the effect of the sensor noise

Page 7: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

The orientation field O is defined as a PxQ image where O(i,j) represents the local ridge orientation at pixel(i,j).[1]

1) The input image is first divided into a number of non-overlapping blocks

2) For each pixel p of the block the x and y components of the gradient, Gx and Gy respectively, are calculated.

 

The average gradient ф direction and dominant local

orientation for the block are given by

w

yx

wyx

GG

GG

)(

21/2tan

221-

2/),( jio

Page 8: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Orientation field image [7]

3) Additional low pass filtering is done in order to eliminate the wrongly estimated ridge.

Page 9: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Filtered image for direction 22.50[1]

Filtered image for direction 900 [1]

Here 8 different values for ф are used : ф=i*Π/8 (i=1,2,……,8) with respect to x-axis are used.

Page 10: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Oriented window and x-signature [3]

Page 11: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

A 32x16 oriented window centered at [xi, yj] is defined in the ridge co-ordinate systems (i.e., rotated to align the y-axis with the local ridge orientation).

The x-signature of the gray-levels is obtained by accumulating for each column x, the gray-levels of the corresponding pixels in the oriented window. This sort of averaging that makes the gray-level profile smoother and prevents ridge peaks from being obscured due to small ridge breaks or pores.

Fij is determined as the inverse of the average distance between two consecutive peaks of the x-signature.

Page 12: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Algorithm for fingerprint enhancement [1]

Page 13: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

The FFT F of the image I is computed each filter Pi is point-by-point multiplied by F, thus

obtaining n filtered image transforms PFi , i=1,2,…,n

inverse FFT is computed for each PFi resulting in n filtered images PIi , i=1,2,…,n

each enhanced image is obtained by setting for each pixel [x,y], Ien[x,y]= PIk[x,y] where k is the index of the filter whose orientation is closest to θxy

Page 14: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Original figure Image after Gabor filtering

))//(5.0exp(*)]22cos[()2/1(),( 22yxyxyx yxywxwyxH

The even symmetric two dimensional Gabor filter has the above form

Page 15: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

ENHANCED IMAGE[7]

it is proposed to implement adaptive filtering for fingerprint enhancement.

Due to the above mentioned characteristics of the fingerprint in the frequency domain directional filtering is used for the enhancement

This technique helps to increase the contrast between the ridges and valleys thereby removing noise from the image.

Page 16: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

References:[1] A.M.Raievi and B.M. Popovi, “An Effective and Robust Enhancement by

Adaptive Filtering Domain”,SER.:ELEC.ENERG. vol.22, no. 1, pp.91-104 April 2009.

[2] B.G. Sherlock, D.M. Monro, and K. Millard, “Fingerprint Enhancement by Directional Fourier Filtering,” IEE Proc. Vision Image Signal Process., vol.141, no. 2, pp. 87-94, April 1994.

[3] L. Hong, Y.Wan, and A.K. Jain, “Fingerprint Image Enhancement: Algorithm and Performance Evolution,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 777-789, Aug. 1998.

[4] J.Yang, L. Lin, T. Jiang, and Y.Fan, “A Modified Gabor Filter Design Method for Fingerprint Image Enhancement,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 24, pp. 1805-1817,Jan. 2003.

[5] A.K. Jain and F. Farrokhnia,”Unsupervised Texture Segmentation Using Gabor Filters,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1,167-1,186, May 1991.

[6] K. Karu and A.K. Jain, “Fingerprint Classification,” Pattern Recognition, vol.29, no. 3, pp. 389-404, 1996.

[7] Database [online]. Availabe http://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/ig/sd27a.cfm.[8] A.L Bovik, Handbook of Image and Video Processing. Elsevier, 2005.[9]K.R.Rao, D.N.Kim and J.J.Hwang, “Fast Fourier Transform:Algorithms and

Applications”, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer 2010.

Page 17: Sreya Chakraborty Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao Multimedia Processing Lab (MPL) University of Texas at Arlington

Thank you