Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Spontaneously breaking space-time: Poincare,
gravity, cosmology, and spinning objects
w/ L. V. Delacretaz, A. Monin, R. Penco, and F. Riva (hep-th/1405.7384)
CERN Feb 27th 2015
Solomon EndlichEPFL
…or how I learned to stop worrying and love the coset construction
SSB of space-time symmetries + coset constructionGravity from the coset perspective
1)
2)
Example: Spinning object3)
Example: Cosmology4)
The Spontaneous breaking of space-time
symmetries
Act 1:
Observation:
Experiments
| i spontaneously breaks Poincaré
laws of physics Poincaré invariant!
Experience “stuff” is not
Consider the (point-like) Lobster:
x
µ = (t, 0, 0, 0)
Unbroken =
⇢P0 time translations
Jij spatial rotations
Broken =
⇢Pi spatial translations
J0i ⌘ Ki boosts
Consider the (point-like) Lobster:
⌘µ⌫dx
µ
d⌧
dx
⌫
d⌧
= �1⌘µ⌫dx
µ
d⌧
dx
⌫
d⌧
= �1
perturb w/ constraint:
�m
Zd⌧ = �m
Zd�
r�⌘µ⌫
dx
µ
d�
dx
⌫
d�
Zdt
✓�m+
1
2mv2 + ...
◆
usual treatment:
Consider the (point-like) Lobster:
Is there a way to construct the theory for the Goldstones (fluctuations) based on the symmetry breaking pattern alone?
Almost!*
*Ivanov and Ogievetsky 1970’s
more recent literature:Neilson and Chadha (1976)
Schäfer, Son, Stephanov, Toublan, and Verbaarschot hep-ph/0108210 (2001)
Low and Manohar hep-th/0110285 (2002)
Watanabe and Brauner 1109.6327 (2011)
Nicolis, and Piazza 1112.5174 (2011)
Watanabe and Murayama 1203.0609 (2012)
Hidaka 1203.1494 (2012)
Nicolis, Penco, Piazza, and Rosen 1306.1240 (2013)
Endlich, Nicolis, and Penco 1310.2272 (2013)
Endlich, Nicolis, and Penco 1311.6491 (2013)
Brauner, Endlich, Monin, and Penco 1407.7730 (2014)
Nicolis, Penco, Piazza, and Rattazzi 1501.03845 (2015)
etc.
Why “almost” (classic interpretation)?
�O(x) = i
X
I
⇡I(x)TIhO(x)i
not independent fluctuations
X
I
⇡I(x)TIhO(x)i = 0?
eliminate redundancy via“inverse Higgs constraint”
NBroken Generators
NGoldstones6=
one usually hears that:
Ex.Unbroken =
⇢P0 time translations
Jij spatial rotations
Broken =
⇢Pi spatial translations
J0i ⌘ Ki boosts
time-dependent boost time-dependent translation
Vs
same information⇡
boost
⇠ d
dt⇡trans
⇡boost
K + ⇡trans
P = 0
(however…can have no redundancy: choice?)
MGoldstone 6= 0 (read: )gap
⇤strong
µ
Energy
A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza, and R. Rosen (hep-th/1306.1240)
…or here
work here…
Mechanism dependent (sort of)S. Endlich, A. Nicolis, and R. Penco (hep-th/1311.6491)
basic construction: 1
1) identify symmetry breaking pattern G ! H
2) build objects out of Goldstones that transform linearly*
*along the lines of Callan, Coleman, Wess and Zumino + Volkov
D⇡ ! h(g,⇡)D⇡
basic construction: 2
4) build a Lagrangian out of H invariant objects made up of D⇡a
3) Inverse Higgs constraints (algebra) [P ,X] = X 0 + ...
=> structure of covariant derivatives
can impose: should? necessary? depends…
D⇡ = 0 =) ⇡(@⇡0)
Expanding the magical step 2)
CCWZ construction generalized to space-time symmetries:
⌦(y,⇡) ⌘ eiya(x)Paei⇡
↵(x)X↵parametrize the coset
g⌦(y,⇡) = ⌦(y0,⇡0)h(y,⇡, g)transformation rules
X↵ = broken generators
¯Pa = unbroken translations
TA = other unbroken generators
GorganizeH0
Expanding the magical step 2) … part 2
Maurer-Cartan form ⌦�1d⌦⌦�1@µ⌦ = Eµ
a(Pa +ra⇡↵X↵ +AB
a TB)
ra⇡↵(x)
g�! ra⇡0↵(x) = ha
b(y,⇡, g)h�↵(y,⇡, g)rb⇡
�(x)
transforms as a covariant derivative
transforms as a connection
rHa ⌘ [(E�1)a
µ@µ + iABa TB ]
transforms as a vierbeind
4x detE
Gravity from the coset perspective
Act 2:
rule of thumb (CCWZ):
Gauge symmetries
⌦�1@µ⌦ ! ⌦�1Dµ⌦ ⌘ ⌦�1(@µ + iAIµVI)⌦.
can we do the same for space-time symmetries? yes
Gravity as “gauged ISO(3,1) with non-linearly
realized translations”
⌦ ⌘ eiya(x)Pa
1) non-linearly realized translations
2)
⌦�1Dµ
⌦ ⌘ e�iy
a(x)Pa
✓@µ
+ ieµ
aPa
+i
2!ab
µ
Jab
◆eiy
a(x)Pa
= ieµ
aPa
+i
2!ab
µ
Jab
eµa = @µy
a + eµa + !ab
µ yb vierbein
“spin” connection
all we have is:
rLa ⌘ (e�1)a
µ(@µ +i
2!bcµ Jbc)
4) S =
Zd
4x det eL(rL
a ) GR?
[rLa ,rL
b ]Vc = Rc
dabVd � Tab
drLd V
c
S = � 1
16⇡G
Zdet(e)d4x
"R
abab +
3X
i
ciT2 + · · ·
#
�S
�!abµ
= 0
Tabc = 0 torsion free!
!(e) ⇠ e�1@e+ ...
GR! (as EFT)
Spinning object
Act 3:
1) SSB pattern:
S ✓ SO(d)with
Unbroken =
⇢P0 time translations
¯Jij = Sij + Jij residual rotations
Broken =
⇢Pi spacial translations
Jab rotations and boosts
Utilizing the coset
2) with ⌦ = eiyaPaei↵abJ
ab/2
x
µ⌦�1Dµ⌦ = iE(P0 +r⇡
iPi +
1
2r↵cdJ
cd)
E = x
⌫e⌫
a⇤a0
r⇡
i = E
�1x
⌫e⌫
a⇤ai
r↵
ab = E
�1⇣⇤ ac ⇤cb + x
µ!µ
cd⇤ca⇤d
b⌘
=d⌧
d�
⇤(↵) = ⇤(⌘)⇤(⇠)with
3) as⇥P0,Ki
⇤⇠ Pi r⇡i = 0
ua⇤ai(⌘) = 0
boost into rest frame accompanying rotating
object
Utilizing the coset
4) build the action
S =
Zd�E
✓�m+
Iijkl4
r↵ijr↵kl + · · ·◆
EFT describing rotating object coupled to gravity
(as advertised)
r↵ = ⇤�1d⌧⇤+ uµ⇤�1!µ⇤with
Utilizing the coset
Turn OFF gravity… what do we get?
Reality check
�
�⇠i(· · · ) = 0 Euler equations
Zdt
1
2Iij⌦
i⌦j + · · · correct leading kinetic energy
What about the ’s? · · ·
Real objects are NOT perfectly rigid… they distort under stress
Meaning of higher derivative terms
Dimensionally Sr↵4 ⇠ S ⌦4 ⇠✓⌦2
!20
◆(I⌦2)
For some “elastic” object EFT tells you related to modes we have integrated out… the
!0
normal modes!
“spherical chunk” I ⇠ �“cubic crystal” S ⇠ �� + cubic
@t⌦ =I�1 ((I⌦)⇥ ⌦) + I�1 ((S⌦⌦⌦)⇥ ⌦)
+ I�1(S⌦⌦) ((I⌦)⇥ ⌦) +O �S⌦2/I
�2
here
Precession!
@t⌦ = I�1 ((S⌦⌦⌦)⇥ ⌦) +O �S⌦2/I
�2
Generalized Euler (in 3 d):
Spherical chunk of cubic crystal rotating off axisEx:
precession of angular velocity (as viewed in body frame)
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
1.8
1.9
2.0
… for some random input values
is this known?
Additional vertices, such as
Coupling to gravity
1
4MPlLk✏kij@ih0
j
⇠ 1
M2Pl
Lk✏kij⇥hi�@�h0
j + · · ·⇤
where L = ⇤(⇠)�I⌦+ S⌦3 + · · ·
�is the angular momentum
Compute (spin-orbit, spin-spin, etc.)
(À la Goldberger, Porto, Rothstein, and others)
cosmological theories
Act 4:
EFT of InflationThe early universe: homogenous, isotropic, and slightly time dependent
Inflation driven by
Time-translations spontaneously broken
Construct a systematic effective field theory
(Creminelli, Luty, Nicolis, Senatore 2006Cheung, Creminelli, Fitzpatrick, Kaplan, Senatore 2007)
Goldstone boson = adiabatic perturbations
�a = �a(t)
⇥a = ⇥a(t+ �(x)) � ⇥a(t) + ⇤t⇥a(t) · �(x)
Can we write down action for Goldstones directly?
Proceed by gauging the space-time symmetries of de Sitter
Couple to matter that spontaneously breaks some of these symmetries (+ internal)
Construct a systematic effective field theory
spontaneously broken TIME + internal shifts
spontaneously broken SPACIAL SHIFTS + internal shifts
EFT of inflation
Solid Inflation
Ex.
Conclusions“stuff” non-linearly realizes space-time symmetries (usual procedures don’t work without being clever)
in EFT one needs to identify 1) d.o.f. and 2) symmetries: coset helps with both
general procedure to couple the Goldstones to gravity
straightforward and exhaustive procedure
SPIN: made simpler? new expansion parameter to assist in computations
straightforward construction of inflation
Applications: cosmology, plasma physics, exotic condensed matter states, etc. all in a model independent fashion
(!/!0)