Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Spoilers and Counter-SpoilersHow to Measure Software Maintainability
Riccardo Bernardini
FOSDEM 2013 – February 2, 2013
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
Outline
• My objective
• The problem
• The solution
• What now?
• Conclusion
1
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
My objective
• Competitions about SW maintainability
• I want to tell you about it
• Why?
– Let you know
– Promote the idea
– Get feedback
– Finding competitors
2
The problem
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
MotivationWhy measuring SW quality?
• Many SW competitions reward
– Fast coding (i.e., IEEExtreme programming)
– Efficiency
– Ingenuity
• SW competitions that reward
– Readability
– Maintainability
– Robustness
are not common
Let’s organize a SW quality competition!
3
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
The problem
• Qualities like efficiency, coding speed, are quantitative
⇒ they are easy to measure objectively
• Qualities like readability, maintainability, . . . are qualitative
⇒ how can we measure them?
⇒ peer review?
– Peer review is subjective . . .
. . . especially with code readability
4
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
The problem with peer-reviewHungarian Notation
i counter sz name p foo
love it or hate it
5
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
The problem with peer-reviewCasing
with underscores CamelConvention Mixed Convention
6
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
The problem with peer-reviewCode blocksif (x==NULL) {
a_convention();}
if (x==NULL){
another_one();}
if (x==NULL){
use_large_indent();if (a==0){
deeper_and_deeper();}
}
7
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
The problem with peer-reviewObject-oriented
fAttribute mMethod() pPrivateMethod()
attribute method() private method()
8
The solution
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it worksStep 1
Once upon a time, there were few programmers. . .
9
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it worksStep 2
. . . who submited code to the competition
10
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it worksStep 3
Some evil spoilers. . .
11
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it worksStep 4
acquired the code. . .
12
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it worksStep 5
and introduced some (nasty, subtle) bugs. . .
13
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it worksStep 6
But then some counter-spoilers (in shining armours) arrived. . .
14
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it worksStep 7
. . . rescued the code. . .
15
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it works
. . . and debugged it! The debugging time was registered
16
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
How it works
Debugging time components: how to separate them?
17
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
We need a //////hero model
At the end we have a sequence of 5-ple
We suppose that
18
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
Solving for the scores
Problem: given the 5-ples, find all SP , SS and SC
• N. of unknown
NP + NS + NC
• N. of 5-ple
N. programs × N. spoilers/code × N. CS/spoiled
• We need
N. 5-ple ≥ NP + NS + NC
19
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
Prizes for everyone!
Best programmer, best spoiler and best counter-spoiler
1 23
1 23 1 23
20
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
Variation: B’n’W competition
Add s and s to the code
21
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
Variation: B’n’W competition (2)
Time components
Faster Slower
22
What now?
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
What now?
• Web interface
• Score model
• Experiments
• Details, details, details, . . .
23
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
Keep in touch
• LinkedIn group
Spoiling and Counter-Spoiling for Software Competitions
• Web site (temporary & mostly empty)
https://sites.google.com/site/counterspoiling/
24
Conclusions
Spoilers and Counter-Spoilers
Conclusions
• A method to measure SW maintainability
• Using spoilers and counter-spoilers
• Possible to mix with other metrics
• Work in progress. First competition (hoepfully) soon
Thank you to inkscape and OpenClipArt for the graphics. . .
25
