Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    1/7

    PH

    YSI

    CAL

    REVIEW

    VOLUM E

    100,

    NUM B

    ER 2

    OCT OB

    ER

    15,

    1955

    Spin-Orbit

    Coupling

    Effects

    in Zinc

    Blende

    Structures*

    G.

    DRESSELHAUst

    Departmesss

    of

    Physics,

    Umioersity

    of

    California, Berkeley,

    Calcforrsia

    (Received

    June

    30,

    1955)

    Character

    tables

    for

    the

    group

    of

    the wave

    vector

    at certain

    points

    of

    symmetry

    in the Brillouin

    zone

    are given.

    The

    additional

    degeneracies

    due

    to

    time reversal

    symmetry

    are indicated.

    The form

    of

    energy

    vz

    wave vector at these

    points

    of

    symmetry

    is derived.

    A possible

    reason for

    the

    complications which

    may

    make

    a

    simple

    effective

    mass

    concept

    invalid

    for

    some

    crystals

    of

    this

    type

    structure will be

    presented.

    HE

    e6'ect

    of

    symmetry

    on

    the

    energy

    band

    structures

    of

    crystals

    of

    the

    zinc blende

    type

    can

    be readily

    derived

    using

    the

    machinery developed

    by

    Bouck.

    aert,

    Smoluchowski,

    and

    Wigner'

    and

    Elliott.

    '

    Recent

    extensive

    studies

    of

    the

    semiconductor

    proper-

    ties'

    of

    InSb,

    which

    has

    the zinc blende structure,

    and

    preliminary

    cyclotron

    resonance

    investigations'

    have

    indicated a

    need for

    a

    more

    thorough

    understanding

    of

    the

    possible energy

    band structures

    of a

    zinc blende

    type

    crystal.

    A

    zinc

    blende structure consists

    of

    two

    interpene-

    trating

    face

    centered

    cubic

    lattices;

    each

    f.

    c.c.

    may

    be

    considered

    a

    sublattice. The two

    sublattices

    are

    dis-

    placed

    by

    one quarter

    of a

    body

    diagonal

    and

    each

    consists entirely

    of

    one

    species

    of

    atom.

    If

    the

    two

    sub-

    lattices

    are

    identical,

    one has a

    diamond

    structure. The

    symmetry

    properties

    of

    diamond

    are

    fully

    discussed

    in

    reference

    2.

    FxG.

    1.

    The

    erst

    Brillouin

    zone

    for a

    face

    centered

    cubic,

    diamond,

    and zinc blende

    structure.

    Points

    and lines

    of

    symmetry

    are

    indicated

    using

    the notation

    of

    reference 1.

    *This

    work has

    been

    supported

    in

    part

    by

    the

    Office

    of

    Naval

    Research

    and

    the

    U.

    S.

    Signal

    Corps.

    t

    Now

    at the Institute

    for

    the

    Study

    of

    Metals,

    University

    of

    Chicago,

    Chicago,

    Illinois.

    'Bouckaert,

    Smoluchowski,

    and

    Wigner,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    50,

    58

    (1936).

    s

    R.

    J.

    Elliott,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    96,

    280 (1954).

    e

    H.

    Welker,

    Z.

    Naturforsch.

    7a,

    744

    (1952);

    8a,

    248

    (1953);

    M.

    Tanenbautn

    and H. B.

    Briggs,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    91,

    1561

    (1953);

    G.

    L.

    Pearson

    and

    M.

    Tanenbaum,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    90,

    153

    1953);

    M.

    Tanenbaum

    and

    J.

    P.

    Maita,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    91,

    1009

    1953);

    H.

    Weiss,

    Z.

    Naturforsch.

    8a,

    463

    (1953);

    O.

    Madelung

    and

    H.

    Weiss,

    Z.

    Naturforsch.

    9a,

    527 (1954).

    4Dresselhaus,

    Kip,

    Kittel,

    and

    Wagoner,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    98,

    556

    (1955).

    The zinc blende

    structure

    has the

    space

    group

    sym-

    metry

    F43m

    or

    T&'.

    There

    are

    no

    glide planes

    or screw

    axes,

    so the

    group

    of

    any

    wave

    vector

    k

    has

    only

    simple

    operations. The

    6rst Brillouin

    zone is the

    well-known

    truncated

    octahedron

    shown

    in

    Fig.

    1. The

    character

    tables

    for

    the

    group

    of

    the wave vector k for certain

    points

    of

    symmetry

    in

    the Brillouin zone are

    given

    in

    Tables

    I

    through VI. When

    the

    spin

    is

    included in

    the

    problem

    only

    the

    double

    representations

    occur

    (i.

    e.

    ,

    representations

    for which

    a

    360'

    rotation,

    E,

    changes

    the

    sign

    of

    the wave

    function).

    The effect

    of

    including

    spin

    in

    the

    problem

    is

    to form wave functions

    of a

    spatial function

    times

    a

    spin

    function

    which will

    transform'

    as

    D;.

    The

    total

    wave function will

    then

    transform

    as

    the

    direct

    product

    of

    a

    single

    group

    repre-

    sentation

    with

    D;.

    This direct

    product

    then

    can be

    decomposed

    in

    terms

    of

    representations of

    the double

    group.

    If more

    than one representation

    of

    the

    double

    group

    occurs

    in

    the

    decomposition

    of the direct

    product,

    a

    spin-orbit

    splitting

    of the level

    is indicated.

    A

    table

    of

    the

    direct

    products

    of the

    single

    group

    representa-

    tions

    with

    Dg

    is

    included with

    each

    character

    table.

    The

    compatibility

    relations

    for

    certain

    lines

    of

    sym-

    metry

    are

    given

    in

    Table VII. These relations

    give

    the

    splitting

    of the

    degeneracies

    as one

    proceeds

    along

    the

    symmetry

    axes. The

    extra

    degeneracies

    due to time

    reversal

    symmetry

    can

    be found

    using

    the

    standard

    test

    due to

    Herring'

    and Eliott.

    '

    The

    extra

    degeneracies

    are

    indicated in each table.

    The

    principal

    diGerence

    from

    the diamond

    structure

    is

    the

    lack

    of

    inversion

    symmetry

    for

    the

    point

    groups

    in

    the

    zinc blende

    structure. Without inversion

    sym-

    metry

    one

    still has the

    result from

    Kramers' theorem'

    that

    E(k)

    =8(

    k),

    but now

    the

    periodic

    part

    of the

    Bloch

    functions no

    longer

    satisfies

    the condition

    I

    q(r)

    =N~(

    r),

    and

    hence

    a

    twofold

    degeneracy

    throughout

    the Brillouin

    zone

    is not

    required.

    The

    one

    electron Schrodinger

    equation

    for

    the

    '

    E.

    Wigner,

    Grlppeatheorie

    U.

    W.

    Edwards,

    Michigan,

    1944),

    p.

    245.

    '

    C. Herring, Phys.

    Rev.

    52,

    361

    (1937).

    ~

    This

    theorem

    states

    that in the

    absence

    of

    magnetic

    6elds

    +lr

    and

    i0.

    %'1,

    *

    are solutions of

    the Hamiltonian for the same

    energy.

    The second

    solution

    belongs

    to wave vector

    ,

    and hence

    we

    have two

    solutions at k

    and

    with

    the

    same

    energy.

  • 8/11/2019 Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    2/7

    SPIN

    ORB IT EFFECTS IN Zn

    BLENDE

    STRUCTURES

    TAsLz I.

    Character

    table of the

    double

    group

    of

    r;

    k=

    (000).

    r,

    Fs

    r4(x,

    y,

    z)

    F5

    r6

    rv

    rs

    1

    1

    2

    3

    3

    6C4B

    1

    1

    2

    0

    0

    0

    1

    1

    0

    0

    1

    1

    8CB

    1

    1

    0

    0

    1

    6I

    XC4

    1

    0

    1

    2

    0

    6I

    XC4

    1

    0

    1

    2

    v2

    0

    j.

    2I

    XCB

    1

    0

    1

    0

    0

    0

    F;

    F;XD)

    Fy

    F6

    r,

    Fv

    Fs

    rs

    r,

    Fv+Fs

    r,

    F6+Fs

    Selection

    rules

    r;

    r;xr

    r,

    F4

    F2

    r,

    F3

    r,

    +r,

    F4

    r,

    +r,+r,+r,

    r,

    r,

    +r,+F,

    yr,

    F6

    Fv+Fs

    r,

    F6+Fs

    Fs

    F6+Fv+2F

    problem

    with

    spin-orbit

    coupling

    is

    p'

    +V+

    (vVXp)

    ~

    p~=Ea+~

    2m

    4m'c'

    The translational

    symmetry

    of

    the lattice

    requires

    that

    the wave

    functions

    be

    of

    the

    Bloch

    form,

    i.

    e.

    ,

    %g

    Ng(r)e'~'

    Degenerate levels

    are

    treated

    by

    solving the

    customary

    secular

    determinants.

    In

    working

    out the

    matrix

    elements

    for

    perturbation

    theory,

    it

    is

    helpful

    to

    use

    group

    theoretical selection

    rules.

    Due to the

    scalar

    character of

    the

    Hamiltonian,

    TABLE

    II.

    Character

    table of

    the

    double

    group

    of

    6;

    k=

    kL100].

    where

    N(r)

    is

    periodic

    and satisfies the

    equation

    P

    +V+

    (vVXp)

    ~

    2m

    4m'c'

    ag(x)

    ~g

    (y+z)

    a4(y

    )

    1 1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    2

    2C4B

    1

    0

    2I

    XC2

    1

    1

    0

    2I

    XC2'

    1

    1

    0

    f

    p

    5

    l

    p

    fez/z'l

    +

    I

    +

    ~xvv

    I=I

    E.

    (m

    4~'c'

    )

    E

    2~)

    The

    equation

    for

    k+K

    is

    p2

    +V+

    (vVXp)

    o+K

    .

    2m

    4m'c'

    f

    p

    +fzk

    I

    +

    Em

    4m'c'

    &;XD)=~5,

    i=

    1, 2,

    3,

    4

    53

    and

    A4

    are

    degenerate

    by

    time reversal

    Selection

    rules

    6;XAy

    ~sX~B

    ~3

    b.

    ;X

    h4

    A4

    A4

    b,

    4

    TABLE III. Character table of

    the double

    group

    of A

    or

    L;

    Ir=

    (k/v3)(111]

    or

    (z-/a)(111).

    3I

    XC2

    3I

    XCB

    ,

    L

    ply'

    +5K

    I

    +

    ~xvv

    I+K

    &m

    4~zc'

    )

    A&(x+y+z)

    A2

    (x+cuy+aPz)

    A 3

    (x+~'y+cuz)

    (~'=1)

    I+K

    (3)

    ~4

    2m

    )

    +s

    A6

    I

    E~+K

    Treating

    the

    term

    L4

    and

    L~

    are

    (A4

    and

    A;

    AsXDy

    Select&on

    rules

    A;

    AI

    Ag

    A;XAz

    A,XA&

    t'

    p

    K'=5K

    I

    axvv

    4m'c'

    )

    as a perturbation,

    the

    energy

    at

    k+K

    for a

    nonde-

    generate

    level

    is

    52)I|2

    Ei+K

    Eg+

    .

    +(pgI

    K

    I

    g)+

    2m

    (4)

    E

    2CB

    2CB

    1 1

    1

    1 1 1

    2

    1

    1

    1 z

    1

    z

    1

    0

    0

    degenerate

    by

    time reversal

    A5

    are

    nondegenerate)

    Ag

    A2 AB

    A6

    As A4+A5+A6

    AB

    A4

    As A4

    Ay+Ay+As

    A6

    A5

    As

    A.

    5

    A6

    As

    A4+A.

    g+A6

  • 8/11/2019 Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    3/7

    G.

    DRESSELHAUS

    Z,

    K

    (s)

    (*+y)

    Zs(x

    y)

    Zs

    Z4

    I

    XC&

    ZsXD(=Zs+Z4,

    i=

    1,

    2

    Selection rules

    Z;

    Zg

    ZsXZz

    Zz

    ZsXZ2

    Zg

    Zg Zs

    Z4

    Z2

    Zs

    Z4

    Z1

    Z4

    Zs

    I

    XC2

    1

    2

    TABLE

    V. Character

    table of the

    double

    group

    of

    X;

    h=

    (2s/a)(100).

    TABLE

    IV.

    Character

    table

    of

    the

    double

    group

    of

    Z

    or

    E;

    lt

    =(k/V2) 110j

    or

    (34r/2a)(110).

    is

    the

    irreducible

    representation

    of

    wave

    vector

    k

    according

    to which

    4'k'

    transforms

    and

    FR

    is

    the

    repre-

    sentation

    according

    to

    which

    a vector

    transforms.

    Another

    way

    of

    viewing the

    selection

    rules

    is

    that the

    only

    representations

    that

    mix with

    F;

    under the

    per-

    turbation

    BC'

    are those contained

    in

    the

    decomposition

    of

    the

    direct

    product

    F;)&FR.

    Tables

    I

    to VII

    also

    give

    the

    decomposition of

    these

    direct

    products

    for

    the

    points

    of

    symmetry

    in

    the

    Brillouin

    zone.

    For

    conveni-

    ence

    the

    combinations

    of

    vector

    components

    which

    transform

    as

    a

    given

    irreducible

    representation

    are

    indicated

    in

    the

    character

    tables.

    In

    order

    to

    give

    a

    more

    complete treatment

    of

    the

    point

    F,

    the

    bases

    shown in

    Table

    VIII

    may

    be

    selected

    for

    the

    irreducible

    representations.

    '

    In

    this

    notation

    the

    spin-orbit

    splittings at

    k=0

    are,

    for F41

    4'*,

    3)z

    /'

    BV

    BV

    AEso

    zl

    B,

    p

    p.

    5,

    l,

    4m'c'

    4 Bx

    By

    )

    4C4~~

    2C4~1)

    2I

    &(C4))

    2I

    XC411

    4I

    XC2

    1

    1

    0

    0

    0

    1

    1 1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    0

    -2

    0

    0

    o

    o m

    2

    0

    0

    2 V2

    Xg

    X2

    Xz(x)

    X4

    Xz(y,

    s)

    X6

    X7

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1 1

    2

    2

    2

    2

    -2

    and for

    I 5&

    5&,

    35

    BV

    BV

    ++Be=

    zl

    el

    pw

    p~

    es

    4m'c'

    Bx

    By

    g Xp

    Xs

    X4

    Xs

    Xs

    X7

    X'7

    Xs

    Xs+X7

    X;

    KXD)

    Selection

    rules

    X; Xg

    X2

    Xs

    X4

    XXX,

    X,

    X4

    X1

    X~

    X;XX5

    X5

    X5 X5 X5

    Xs

    X6

    X7

    X5

    X7

    Xs

    X1+X2+X3+X4

    Xs+X7

    Xs+X7

    TABLE

    Vl. Character

    table of

    the double

    group

    of

    5';

    h

    =

    (24r/a)

    (0

    ,

    1).

    I

    XC4'

    1

    z

    /i

    C42

    C4 I

    XC4

    I

    XC4 I

    XC4'

    1

    i+i-

    i

    iv'i

    Qi

    1

    z

    z

    4/i

    i/i-

    +i

    1

    1

    1 1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    W1

    Wz(x)

    Wz(y+is}

    W4(y

    s)

    8'5

    W7

    Ws

    z

    gi

    iv'i

    z

    Z

    b

    z

    z

    TABLE

    VII

    Compatibility

    relations

    Selection

    rules

    suggest

    that

    the

    representations

    F4

    and

    F5

    have

    first-order

    matrix

    elements

    with

    3

    and

    hence finite

    slopes.

    Actually

    all

    6rst-order

    matrix

    elements

    with

    p

    vanish

    due

    to time

    reversal

    symmetry.

    For

    example,

    (Bzl

    pl

    Bz)

    =

    (8sl

    plBt)

    by

    a

    reflection

    in

    the

    (101)

    plane,

    but

    by

    partial

    integration

    (8t

    l

    p

    l

    8s)

    =

    Bs

    l

    pl

    Bz),

    as the

    8,

    's

    are

    real

    if

    the

    Hamiltonian

    has

    time-inversion

    symmetry;

    hence

    all

    such

    matrix

    ele-

    ments

    vanish.

    This

    argument

    only

    holds

    if

    all

    5

    s are

    from

    the

    same

    degenerate

    F4

    level.

    When

    spin-orbit

    interaction

    is

    included

    in the

    per-

    turbation

    (i.

    e.

    ,

    the

    oXV V term is

    not

    neglected),

    the

    energy

    to

    erst

    order

    in

    k

    for

    a

    F8

    level is

    given

    by

    the

    W;

    W'XD-;

    Selection

    rules

    W;

    W'X W2

    W

    XWs

    W;X

    W4

    the

    term

    Ws+W6

    Wg

    W7+

    Ws

    Ws

    W6+

    W7

    W4

    Ws+

    Ws

    Ws W7

    Ws W5

    W5

    Ws

    W7

    Ws

    5(

    fi

    R=

    l

    p+

    4rxv'U

    m

    (

    4mc'

    Wg Wp

    Ws W4

    Ws

    Ws

    W2

    W1

    W4

    Ws

    W7 W6

    W4 W~

    Wr Ws

    W7

    W4

    Ws

    W1

    8'g

    W5

    F1~

    Q1

    F2

    Q2

    Fs

    ~

    ~1+~2

    P4

    ~

    411+

    (413+~4)

    pz

    ~

    as+(&4+&4)

    F6,

    F7,

    Fs~

    ~5

    F1

    Ai

    F2

    A.

    g

    Fs

    As

    F4

    41+As

    Fs

    A~+A.

    s

    FF7~X,

    Fs

    ~

    ~4+&5+As

    X1~

    A1

    (L4+Lz)

    ~

    A4+Az

    X2~

    h.

    ~

    Xs~h1

    X4

    h2

    X,

    (~,+~,

    }

    Xs,

    X7~

    a5

    Time reversal

    degenerate

    representations

    are

    indicated

    by

    paren-

    theses.

    transforms

    as a

    vector. Matrix elements of

    the

    type

    (+

    I&-le )

    will

    vanish

    unless

    the

    direct

    product

    4

    See

    p

    v& r

    Laze

    end

    H.

    A.

    Bethe,

    Phys. Rev.

    71,

    612

    F,

    XFaXF;

    contains the

    unit

    representation, where

    F;

    (1942}.

  • 8/11/2019 Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    4/7

    SPI N

    ORBIT

    EFFECTS

    IN

    Zn

    BLEN DE

    STRUCTURES

    secular determinant

    (i/2)Ck+

    i/2)Ck

    Ck,

    (iV3/2)Ck

    (i'/2)Ck+

    Ck,

    Ck,

    iV3/2)Ck+

    (i/2)Ck

    i'/2)Ck

    Ck,

    (i/2)Ck,

    where X=E'

    h'ks/2m),

    which

    has solutions

    X=

    ~C(k'yL3(k

    'k

    'yk

    'k

    '+k

    'k

    ')]&)-*'

    '=

    ~C(ks

    L3(k

    sk

    syk

    sk

    s+k

    sk

    s)]-:):

    where

    1 5s)

    BU

    for

    r,

    &,

    2~pm'c'E

    By

    )

    1ks( BU

    2%3m'cs

    E

    By

    C=O,

    for

    F3.

    The

    first-order

    energies

    are

    shown

    in

    Fig.

    2 for the

    L100],

    [111],

    and

    1-110]

    directions.

    In

    polar

    coordinates,

    k,

    =ksin8cosp, k=ksin8sing,

    k,

    =kcos8,

    Eqs.

    (8)

    become

    X=

    ~CkL1~(3)&

    sin8(cosi8+r~

    sin'8

    sins2&)&]&.

    (10)

    Figure

    3

    shows the four

    6rst-order

    energies given

    by

    Eq.

    (10)

    for

    constant

    k plotted

    against

    the

    angle

    8

    for

    wave

    vectors

    in

    a

    (110)

    plane (@=sr/4).

    It

    is

    interesting

    to

    note

    that

    the

    two-dimensional A.

    6

    level is

    the

    inter-

    section of

    surfaces

    which

    arise

    from

    two

    diferent

    repre-

    sentations in

    a

    [100]

    direction.

    Any

    large

    separation

    of the

    energy

    levels which transform as

    F8

    at the center

    ENERGY

    of

    the

    zone,

    as one

    proceeds

    toward

    the

    edge

    of

    the

    zone,

    then

    would

    entail

    a

    rather

    complex

    band

    structure

    with

    highly

    deformed

    energy

    surfaces and accidental

    de-

    generacies.

    '

    Second-order

    perturbation

    theory

    for the

    F8

    level

    is

    tractable

    on

    the

    approximation

    that

    only

    first-order

    terms

    in

    e&VV and

    second-order

    terms

    in

    y

    be

    con-

    sidered. The fourth-order

    equation

    which

    results from

    the

    4)&4

    secular

    determinant

    is

    (L

    M

    l'

    s

    (L

    M

    '

    y'

    y'

    I

    3

    )('(k

    sk

    2+k

    sk

    2+k

    sk

    2)+Csks

    L

    Mq'

    /4yCsg(ksksyksks+ksks)+

    ~

    ~

    k4

    3

    E'

    (L,

    M)'

    + (k.

    'kys+k'k, '+k,

    'k,

    ')

    3

    +C'Ek' 3(k'k'+k'k'+k'k')]

    L

    M's-

    +2~

    ~

    C'(k,

    '+k

    '+k ')

    )

    /Ll'

    2

    3~

    ~

    +

    S'

    C'k'(k

    'k

    '+k

    'kg'+kg'k-')

    3 ) 3

    pL

    M'

    +21~

    ~

    C'k'k'k'=0,

    (11)

    )

    where

    I,

    ,

    3f,

    and

    S

    are real numbers

    and

    can be

    ex-

    pressed

    in terms of sums over the

    squares

    of

    the

    Fn.

    2.

    Plot

    of

    energy

    es

    wave vector

    showing

    the

    first-order

    energy

    for

    the

    spin-orbit

    split

    F4

    or

    I's

    level in

    100 ,

    110),

    and

    (111

    direc-

    tions.

    The circled

    num-

    bers indicate the

    dimen-

    sion

    of the

    representa-

    tion.

    P7 Qi

    Qi

    g4

    {oooj

    (ooo)

    k[IIO]

    k

    goo]

    (ooo)

    Fxo.

    3.

    Cylindrical

    cross

    section

    around

    the

    point

    F of

    a

    plot

    of

    energy

    ss wave

    vector for wave vectors

    in a

    (110)

    plane.

    C.

    Herring, Phys.

    Rev.

    52,

    365

    (1937).

  • 8/11/2019 Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    5/7

    G.

    D RESSEL

    HA

    US

    TAsI.E VIII.

    Basis

    functions for

    the

    irreducible

    representations'

    of the double

    group

    for

    the

    point

    l

    .

    r~=1

    rs,

    dS

    =

    Lx'(ys

    ')

    +yc(z'

    ')

    +z'(*'

    ')7

    Fg,

    'y1=x

    +Glg+GPS

    y2

    =

    x'+any'+coo

    cd=

    1

    rs,

    n

    }

    0.

    +)

    r

    Pl-)

    lil+)

    1

    r.

    (r),

    'v+

    ~)l+)

    v2

    (~

    'Ys

    ~71)

    I )

    V2

    ~'vs

    ~v~)

    I+&

    v2

    Pro.

    4. A

    cylindrical cross

    section

    around

    the

    point

    I

    of

    a

    plot

    of

    energy

    vs

    wave

    vector

    for wave vectors

    in

    a

    (110) plane

    showing

    the third order

    splitting

    of the

    F6

    or

    I'7

    surface.

    14,

    bg=x

    82=y

    53=8

    ~'vs+~v

    ~)

    I

    )

    v2

    1

    rv('),

    :

    (si

    os)

    I+&+Ssl

    &7

    V3

    1

    I

    ~(s~

    ss.

    )

    I

    )

    +

    7

    VS

    r,

    (r,&},

    s,

    Q,

    )

    I

    )

    W2

    1

    I

    i(a,

    b,

    )

    I+&+2s3I

    &7

    6

    1

    --

    E~(s~+sss)

    I

    &+I

    +&7

    6

    it=

    %I

    1007

    the

    energy

    eigenvalues are

    )L+2Mq

    '

    (L

    Mq

    '

    +k[100l

    =

    u'+'

    I

    I

    u'+

    I

    I

    fs4+c

    2m

    E

    3

    J,

    k

    3

    where

    each

    root

    is

    double;

    and

    for

    k=

    (k/V3)I

    1117

    (L+2M

    )

    ~[sy~sl

    [irtl

    =

    &

    +

    I

    Ik'

    -I~vl

    (double)

    (12)

    r,

    ,

    e,

    =x(ys

    ')

    es

    =

    y(z*-x')

    es

    (x'

    ')

    z

    ~i+fss)

    I+&

    V2

    1

    rs(re),

    p s(eq

    ts)

    +)+

    3I

    )7

    &3

    s(ei+ses)l

    )

    s3I+)

    7

    v3

    rs(rat),

    e&

    s)

    I

    )

    v2

    b(e~

    ~s)l+)+2eal

    &7

    6

    Ls(e~+s)

    I

    &+2esl+&7

    6

    ~~+s)

    I+)

    V2

    +

    lP+%2Ck

    (13)

    3

    O'

    V2Ck.

    An

    estimate

    of

    the

    magnitude

    of

    the

    constant

    C

    may

    be

    obtained

    if

    one

    considers the

    zinc blende structure

    as a

    deformed

    diamond

    type

    structure.

    Here

    we

    will consider

    U'=

    V

    V;

    as a

    perturbation,

    where

    Vi

    is a

    diamond

    type

    potential with inversion

    symmetry

    and

    V

    is

    the

    actual

    zinc

    blende

    type

    potential.

    The

    correct

    6rst-order

    spatial

    wave

    functions for

    a zinc

    blende structure are then

    given

    by

    the

    following

    equations.

    Fol

    Py)

    absolute

    value of

    matrix

    elements,

    and

    (~'+I

    1

    l~+)

    (&'

    I

    1

    l~+)

    n=u++

    Q

    n,

    ++

    Q

    P',

    '

    =I,

    +

    ~~0

    ~;

    ' =~2

    &O

    &'

    fi'

    t'L+2M

    ~

    Iu+y.

    3

    )

    +0 ~i

    i

    =~2

    +0

    (14)

    For

    a

    general

    k,

    Eq.

    (11)

    has

    four real

    roots;

    for

    io

    Dresselhaus,

    Kip,

    and

    Kittel, Phys.

    Rev.

    98,

    368

    (1955).

    '

    For

    a

    more

    detailed

    treatment see the

    paper

    by

    F.

    Herman

    (to

    be

    published).

    R.

    H.

    Parrnenter,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    100,

    573

    (1955}.

  • 8/11/2019 Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    6/7

    SPIN

    ORBIT EFFECTS

    IN

    ZII

    BLEND E STRUCTURES

    For

    I'2,

    p

    i

    =r2+

    (-;-I

    l

    I=)

    n;

    +

    g

    lattice

    constant

    and

    A~o

    is

    the spin-orbit

    splitting

    at

    k=0.

    The

    first-order

    energy

    at

    the

    zone

    edge

    in

    a

    [100]

    direction

    is

    (-;-I

    I

    IW)

    e=~'+

    Z;-+

    E

    jap

    jv.

    i

    =r2+

    For

    I'3,

    (v-;

    II lv-

    )

    vx=vx++

    2

    QKi

    (vx;

    I

    &'Ivx+)

    +

    2

    +xi

    )

    jvp

    jv.

    =r12

    (v;

    II'lv

    -)

    vIc vK

    +

    VKi

    (vx;

    I

    &'I

    vx-)

    +

    2

    %xi

    ~

    (sx;+I

    &'I

    ex+)

    &z

    Ep

    8

    For

    I'~,

    (~-;-II

    l~

    -)

    4c=&x

    + 4c

    ;

    =r15-

    EP

    E;

    (

    '+Iv'ls

    )

    +

    2

    ex'+,

    i

    =rg5+

    Ep

    E.

    (&x; I&

    le++)

    5K=+

    p

    .

    ~Z4

    (17)

    2m

    ~so

    E

    C

    2s.

    0.

    02

    ev (in

    InSb).

    8

    Z

    Hence the

    splitting

    due

    to

    the

    first-order

    terms would

    be

    only

    of

    the

    order of

    0.02 ev

    if the

    slope

    were linear

    all

    the

    way

    to

    the

    edge

    of the

    zone.

    Actually

    the

    second-

    order

    terms

    which

    should be

    large

    due

    to the

    small

    energy

    gap

    will

    turn the

    surfaces

    down

    very rapidly.

    Using

    this

    value

    for

    C

    and

    the

    values of

    I.

    ,

    M,

    and

    X

    from

    cyclotron

    resonance experiments on

    Ge,

    '

    it

    would

    seem

    from

    Eq.

    (11)

    that near

    the center

    of

    the Brillouin

    zone the

    removal of the

    twofold Kramers

    degeneracy

    is

    at most 10

    4

    ev

    for holes with thermal

    energies.

    Under these

    circumstances

    it

    seems

    quite likely

    that a

    perturbation

    expansion

    about the

    extremum

    should

    contain

    several

    orders

    of

    perturbation theory, and

    a

    simple

    energy

    surface with

    effective

    mass tensor

    com-

    ponents

    independent

    of

    wave vector

    would

    be a

    very

    poor

    approximation.

    For the

    I 6

    and

    F7

    level

    the

    energy

    to

    third order in

    k

    is

    given

    by

    E=

    C

    k'~C

    [k'(k

    'k

    '+k

    'k

    '+k

    'k

    ')

    k

    'k

    'k

    ']'

    (20)

    In

    third

    order

    the

    levels are

    split

    in

    all

    but

    the

    [100]

    and

    [111]

    directions.

    In

    polar

    coordinates

    Eq. (20)

    reads

    E=

    Cek'+Cik'

    sin8[1

    in'8

    (1+2

    sin'2p)

    +

    (9/4)

    sin'2p

    sin48]l.

    (21)

    For

    F5,

    (&x;+I

    &'I

    &x+)

    err

    =~K

    +

    ~z;+

    gp

    g

    4

    (;-I

    v'l~

    +)

    &Xi

    )

    p

    (&rr;+I

    &'I

    ere

    )

    ex=ex

    +

    ~z'+

    i =rIfi

    jvp

    jv.

    (ex'

    I

    I

    I

    )

    where

    the cubic

    harmonics

    are

    as

    defined

    in reference

    8

    except

    that

    Vt+

    =

    Vs+*=

    x'+4ey'+to's', (oi'=

    1),

    and

    the

    &

    superscript

    is

    used to denote

    the

    parity

    of the

    functions.

    For the

    I'4

    level

    arising

    from

    a

    diamond

    type

    F+

    level

    fz'

    C=-

    &3

    tS

    C i

    =r&4

    (et+I

    ~l'*/~yl34'

    )(~i'

    I

    l

    I

    et+)

    (19)

    (Eo

    E')

    To

    a

    very

    rough

    approximation

    V'

    P';/Z

    where Z

    is the atomic

    number.

    C

    (1/Z)hsoa,

    where

    a

    is

    the

    Figure

    4

    shows

    a

    plot

    of

    energy

    es

    8

    for

    constant k and

    &=4r/4

    [i.

    e.

    ,

    k in

    a

    (110)

    plane].

    The

    surfaces

    have

    their maximum

    separation

    along

    &il0) axes.

    In the

    III

    V

    class

    of

    semiconducting

    compounds

    like

    InSb,

    the

    high

    mobility

    electrons

    are

    presumably

    in

    a

    spheri-

    cally

    symmetric

    I'6

    state.

    '

    Higher

    orders

    in

    k

    should

    not enter

    until

    the thermal

    or Fermi

    energy

    for

    the

    electrons is

    of

    the

    order

    of the

    band

    splittings

    at

    k=0.

    In

    impure

    e-type

    InSb

    with electron

    concentrations

    10 /cm'

    and

    a

    Fermi

    energy of

    0.

    2 ev one

    may

    be

    entering

    into a

    region

    where the

    splitting

    of

    the

    degeneracy

    for the

    electrons

    should

    be considered.

    Perturbation

    expansions

    for

    other

    points

    in

    the

    Brillouin

    zone

    are

    facilitated by

    writing

    the

    perturbation

    in

    a

    form such

    that

    the vector combinations

    indicated

    in the character tables

    appear;

    these combinations

    are,

    for

    the

    points

    I',

    (000),

    and

    X,

    (24r/a) (100),

    K'=

    k~

    +kR+k&. (22)

    for the

    point

    W,

    (24r/a)

    (O,

    s,

    1),

    3C'

    =

    K+,

    +p[(K+i

    K,

    )

    (RE,

    )

    +(KsK,

    )

    (Z+4m.

    )];

    (23)

    '4

    Hrostowslti,

    Wheatley,

    and

    Flood,

    Phys,

    Rev.

    95,

    1683

    (1954).

  • 8/11/2019 Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    7/7

    G.

    DRESSELHAUS

    TABLE

    IX. Possible

    energy

    extrema

    for

    the

    representations

    of

    the

    double

    group

    in

    zinc

    blende

    structures.

    X6

    x

    -0

    7

    f22

    Cl

    12

    I

    X

    c9

    CL

    X7

    -8

    z

    p-.

    X6

    LLI

    0-

    r

    -0

    6

    rs

    0

    r

    -0

    7

    Is

    r,

    L6

    L6

    (

    L4&

    Lg)

    L6

    L6

    Extrema at

    (000)

    (k/VS)

    L111]

    h.

    Representations

    of

    double

    group

    r,

    F7

    Fa

    (from

    Fq)

    Constant

    energy

    surfaces

    sphere

    sphere

    2

    warped

    energy

    surfaces as

    for

    holes

    in Si

    and

    Ge

    8

    spheroids;

    &11'1)

    axes

    8

    spheroids;

    &111)

    axes

    0-

    I

    6

    (2s.

    /a)(1,

    xs

    0)

    W

    Ws,

    Wo,

    W7,

    Ws

    6

    spheroids;

    (100)

    axes

    2

    /,

    (IOO)

    (ooo)

    (ooo)

    /p

    (I

    I

    I)

    REDUCF D

    WAVE

    VECTQR

    K

    General

    point

    48 general

    ellipsoids

    FIG.

    5. A

    schematic

    drawing

    of

    the

    energy

    levels for a

    zinc

    blende

    type

    structure

    modification of

    boron

    nitr ide based

    on

    Herman's

    calculation

    for

    diamond

    PF.

    Herman,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    88,

    1210

    (1952);

    thesis,

    Columbia

    Vniversity,

    1953

    (unpublished)].

    The

    spin-orbit

    splittings

    are

    highly

    exaggerated

    for

    the

    purpose

    of

    illustration.

    The levels

    marked with an 0 have

    zero

    slope

    along

    that axis.

    This

    6gure

    should be

    compared

    with

    Elliott's

    Fig.

    2.

    L'R.

    J.

    Elliott,

    Phys.

    Rev.

    96, 266

    (1954).

    g

    for

    the

    points

    A, (k/~3(111),

    and

    L,

    (m/a)(111),

    x'=

    ',

    (E'

    +K

    +E,

    )

    (R,

    +R+R,

    )

    +

    (K,

    +toK+cesK,

    )

    (R,

    +aPR,

    +(oR.

    )

    +

    (E,

    +tosE+toE,

    )

    (

    R,

    +

    toR+c,

    )i,

    (24)

    and

    for

    the

    points

    Z, (k/v2) (110),

    and

    6,

    k(001)

    5C'=

    K&,

    +ts[(K,+-K)

    (R,

    +R)

    +

    (K,

    K)

    (R,

    R

    )

    ).

    (25)

    Using

    these

    perturbations the

    Grst-order

    energies

    can be

    written down at

    sight

    and are

    of the

    following

    form: for

    hs,

    k(100),

    Z=CsK

    +Cs(Ks+K,

    )'*;

    (26)

    for

    A4

    and

    As,

    (k/~3

    (111),

    E=

    C,

    (E,+E+E,

    );

    (2&)

    for

    h6,

    E=

    Cs(E,+E+E,

    +CsLEs

    (EgK+KE,

    +E,

    K.

    ))&) (28)

    for

    Z4

    or

    Zs,

    (k/~2(110),

    Z=Cr(E,

    +E

    )+CsK,

    ;'

    (29)

    and

    for

    Xs

    or

    Xr, (2m/a)

    (100),

    Z=

    &C

    (Es+Es,

    )

    &.

    The second-order energies

    for

    the

    point

    W,

    (2s.

    /u) (0,

    ts,

    1),

    are of

    the

    form

    Z=CtoE

    '+C

    (Ett'+E',

    ).

    s(31)

    If

    the

    energy

    extremum is

    at

    the

    point

    8',

    the constant

    energy

    surfaces will

    be

    spheroids

    with

    &

    100& axes.

    The

    irreducible

    representations

    A4

    and

    A5

    only

    have

    slopes

    along

    a

    &111&

    axis,

    hence

    if the constant

    C4

    is

    zero at

    some

    point along

    the axis

    as

    it

    presumably

    is

    g.par

    the

    ct:nter of

    the

    zone

    in InSb

    due

    to

    the

    perturbing

    influence of

    the lowest

    conduction states

    (see

    Fig.

    5),

    then

    the

    constant

    energy

    surfaces

    at

    these

    extrema will

    be

    spheroids

    with

    &111&

    axes.

    However,

    because

    of

    the

    smallness

    of the

    first-order terms

    compared

    to

    the

    second-order

    terms,

    it

    is

    not expected

    that

    these

    extrema

    will

    be of

    any

    significance in

    the band structure

    if

    they

    occur near

    the

    center

    of

    the

    zone.

    The

    representation

    I'8

    at the

    center of the

    zone

    can

    have zero

    slope

    if

    it

    arises from

    the

    two-dimensional

    representation

    F3

    of the

    single

    group.

    In this

    case

    the

    energy

    to

    second order

    in

    k is

    given

    by

    E=Ct2ks&LCtssk'+Ct4s(k,

    'ks+k'k,s+k,

    'k

    ')]l,

    (32)

    in

    the limit

    that

    all

    spin-orbit

    splittings

    are

    negligible

    compared

    with the

    spacing

    between

    levels

    at k=0,

    then

    C~4'

    C~3'. In

    atomic Sn

    it

    is

    known that

    the 4d

    levels

    overlap

    the Ss atomic

    levels,

    hence

    in

    grey

    Sn

    or

    InSb

    it is conceivable

    that a

    I 3

    level,

    which

    can

    be

    represented

    in

    a

    tight

    binding approximation

    by

    d-orbitals,

    could

    be

    the

    uppermost valence

    band.

    Table

    IX

    gives

    a

    tabulation

    of the

    types

    of

    energy

    surfaces

    which

    might

    be

    expected

    at

    certain

    points

    in

    the

    Brillouin

    zone. It

    should

    be

    emphasized

    in all these

    considerations

    that

    if

    the

    spin-orbit

    interaction is

    small

    or

    the

    difference

    in

    the crystal

    potential

    from the

    diamondlike

    potential

    is

    only slight,

    then the

    region

    of

    convergence

    of

    the

    energy

    expressions

    will be

    small

    compared

    to

    kT and one

    should

    then

    consider

    only

    the

    single

    group

    representations

    in

    the

    6rst

    case,

    or the

    diamond structure

    double

    group

    representations

    in the

    latter

    case.

    If

    the

    region

    of

    convergence

    of the per-

    turbation

    expansion

    is ~kT,

    then

    one is

    not

    justi6ed

    in

    keeping only

    the lowest

    nonvanishing

    term and

    a

    simple

    effective mass

    approximation

    would

    seem unjus-

    ti6ed.

    From the order

    of magnitude

    estimate

    of

    the

    spin-orbit

    splitting,

    it

    seems

    this

    might

    be

    the case

    for

    holes in InSb.

    I should

    like

    to

    thank

    Professor

    C.

    Kittel

    for

    sug-

    gesting

    this

    problem

    and

    for

    guidance

    throughout

    the

    course

    of the

    investigation.

    I am

    indebted

    to

    Dr. F.

    Herman

    and

    Dr. R.

    Paramenter

    of

    R.

    C.A.

    Laboratories

    for

    communicating ,

    their

    results

    to

    me

    prior

    to pub-

    lication.

    I also

    wish to

    thank

    Mr. R,

    K,

    Qehringer

    for

    checking

    the manuscript.