25
Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB Physics Motivation Jlab kinematics and factorization Double spin asymmetries Single Spin Asymmetries Future measurements Summary P. Bosted * * In collaboration with H. Avakian, V.Burkert and L.Elouadrhiri SIR-2005 Jefferson Lab

Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB Physics Motivation Jlab kinematics and factorization Double spin asymmetries Single Spin Asymmetries

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB

Physics MotivationJlab kinematics and factorizationDouble spin asymmetries Single Spin AsymmetriesFuture measurementsSummary

P. Bosted *

* In collaboration with H. Avakian, V.Burkert and L.Elouadrhiri

SIR-2005

Jefferson Lab

Page 2: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 2

Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering (SIDIS):

• Probes orbital motion of quarks through quark transverse momentum distribution• Access to new PDFs not accessible in inclusive DIS.

kT-dependent parton distributions

Sivers transversity

Mulders,This talk

Off-diagonal PDFs vanish if quarks only in s-state!

In addition T-odd PDFs require FSI (Brodsky et al., Collins, Ji et al. 2002)

This talk

Page 3: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 3

SIDIS kinematic plane and relevant variables

Ey /ν=

)/(sinEEQ ' 24 22 θ=

νMQx 2/2=

'EE−=ν

ν/Ez h=

Page 4: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 4

JLab Kinematics and Facorization

Traditional DIS: W>2 GeV, Q2>1.1 GeV2

Berger criteriium for current fragmentation dominance is z>0.4 Require z<0.7 to avoid diffractive rho meson contributions (and keep Mx>1.4 GeV)

Pt<1 GeV (approximately exponential region)

Study if factorization broken for these cuts using unpolarized data from E00-108 in Hall C

Page 5: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 5

Hall C E00-108 dataExperiment ran in August 2003 Close-to-final data analysis Small Q2 variation not corrected yet

No visual “bumps and valleys” in pion ratios off deuterium x = 0.32

x = 0.32

PRELIMINARY

PRELIMINARY

Page 6: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 6

From E00-108 deuterium data: D-/D+ = (4 – N+/N

-)/(4N+/N

- - 1)

D-/D+ ratio should be independent of x, and data supports this for W=2.5 GeV, Q2=2.5 GeV2, pt<0.3 GeV

but should depend on z Find similar slope versus z as HERMES, but slightly larger values (could be due to lower average photon energy)

z = 0.55

x = 0.32

PRELIMINARY

PRELIMINARY

Page 7: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

7

CLAS Experiment Setup and Kinematics

Scattering of 5.7 GeV polarized electrons off polarized NH3, ND3

~8M + in SIDIS kinematics

x x

Page 8: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

8

• Target polarization PT about 0.7 (0.3) for NH3 (ND3)• Beam polarization PB about 0.7• Dilution factor f varies from 0.1 to 0.3: used Lund model for n/p ratio and preliminary Hall B data for A-dependence• Depolarization factor DLL(y) evaluated assuming R same as for inclusive.• Assumed Aperp=0 (not measured)• No radiative corrections applied• “+” and “-” include some K+, K- for P>1.5 GeV • 0 events cleanly identified with two photons

Determination of g1/F1 (approximately A1)

++−+

++−+

+−

≈NN

NN

)y(fDPPA

LLTB

p 11

Page 9: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 9

x-depenence of SIDIS g1/F1

• Good agreement with HERMES + data at 3x higher Q2

• x-dependence follows PEPSI (Lund) Monte Carlo using GRSV polarized PDFs (LO)

• Magnitude also in good agreement with simulation

Page 10: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 10

SIDIS: factorization studies

g1/F1 inclusive, for the sum of , and for are consistent with each other in the range 0.4<z<0.7, as expected in LO with factorizationand current fragmentation dominance

GRVS

Page 11: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 11

z-depenence of SIDIS g1/F1

CLAS 5.7 GeV

PRELIMINARY

No significant z-dependence seen 0.3<z<0.7, as expected for factorization and current fragmentation dominance

Good agreement with PEPSI predictions (including dropoff at high z for -)

Page 12: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 12

pt-depenence of SIDIS g1/F1

No pt dependence expectedin LO if current fragmentationdominance and factorization

Slight pt dependence seen(but results quite sensitiveto pt dependence of A-dependence needed for dilution factor)

Reasonable agreement with PEPSI predictions.

PRELIMINARY

CLAS 5.7 GeV

Page 13: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

13

SIDIS g1/F1 for Deuteron

Results don’t agree as well with PEPSI using GRSV, more sensitive to un-favored fragmentation functionand NLO corrections than proton (although errorsare about a factor of two larger)

NLO QCD fits including new SIDIS CLAS data canhelp constrain polarized PDFs in valence region

PRELIMINARYCLAS 5.7 GeV

Page 14: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 14

Longitudinally Polarized Target SSA

Clear dependence seen for proton target and +, 0

Fit A*sin() + B*sin(2) for Twist-3 and Twist-2 respectively

Page 15: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 15

)()( 12

,

sin zHxxheQ

MS q

Lqqq

LUL⊥

−Σ∝φσ

SSA: x-dependence

∑∑ ⊥⊥

=

q

qq

q

qqL

ULTUL zDxf

zHxh

DPA)()(

)()(

11

112sin φ

PRELIMINARY 5.7 GeV

Twist-2 Higher Twist

Data in rough agreement with Efremov et al.predictions, exceptfor 0 sin() term(evidence for termsnot involving Collinsfragmentation?)

Page 16: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 16

For Collins fragmentation function use HERMES data

Systematic error only from unknown ratio of favored and unfavored Collins functions (R= H1

d→/H1u→), band

correspond to -2.5<R<0

CLAS-5.7GeV

First glimpse of Twist-2 TMD h1L┴

PRELIMINARY

•More data required with - & 0 •Exclusive 2 pion background may be important

Distribution functions fromQSM from Efremov et al

Page 17: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 17

Future: more 0 data in SIDIS

1) SIDIS0 production is not contaminated by diffractive

2) HT effects and exclusive 0 suppressed3) Simple PID by 0-mass (no kaon contamination)4) Provides complementary to +/- information on

PDFs

disadvantages: reconstruction efficiency (requires detection of 2)

advantages:

Page 18: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 18

CLAS+Inner Calorimeter (IC)

IC at CLAS opens new avenue for studies of spin and azimuthal

asymmetries of exclusive and semi-inclusive

CLAS

CLAS+IC

CLAS

IC

424 PbWO4 ……..crystals

Reconstruction efficiency of high energy 0 with IC increases ~ 4 times due to small angle coverage

IC σE/E=0.0034/E+0.038/√E+0.022

Page 19: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

19

σUL ~KM

Longitudinally polarized target SSA using CLAS+IC

•Provide measurement of SSA for all 3 pions, extract the Mulders TMD and study Collins fragmentation with longitudinally polarized target•Allows also measurements of 2 pion asymmetries

Hunf=-1.2Hfav

Hunf=-5Hfav

Hunf=0

50 days of CLAS+IC

curves, QSM from Efremov et al

Page 20: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 20

Summary

Spin and azimuthal asymmetries measured at 5.7 GeV with longitudinally polarized target.

•Double spin asymmetries of pions are consistent with factorization and partonic picture: may be used in future NLO QCD fits.

• sinandsin2 SSA measured, providing access to the twist-2 TMD h1L distribution and testing the Collins fragmentation function

•Future measurements with IC, if approved, will greatly improve 0 data. Much greater improvements for all reactions possible with 12 GeV upgrade due to much larger coverage of DIS kinematics.

Page 21: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 21

support slides…..

Page 22: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 22

Collins effect and 2 pion production

Simple string fragmentation (Artru model)

Sub-leading pion opposite to leading

(into page)

L=1

production may produce an opposite sign AUT

Leading opposite to leading (into page)

Understanding of 2 pion asymmetries will help to understand single pion mesurements

+

0

Page 23: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 23

•sin SSA + increases with PT and is consistent with HERMES measurement.

AULSSA: PT-dependenceHT –SSA significant for + and 0

CLAS PRELIMINARY

Page 24: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 24

AULSSA: z-dependence

CLAS PRELIMINARY

Page 25: Spin and azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS at JLAB  Physics Motivation  Jlab kinematics and factorization  Double spin asymmetries  Single Spin Asymmetries

P. Bosted, SIR-2005 25

Missing mass of pions in ep→e’X

In accessible kinematics (Q2>1.5,W2>4) low MX(large z) for 0 are suppressed by current CLAS acceptance.

-0

+n

0

++