Upload
sarah-burstein
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
1/57
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
SPECTRUM DIVERSIFIED DESIGNS, INC.675 Mondial ParkwayStreetsboro, OH 44241
Plaintiff
v.
HARMAN, INC.310 Annagem Blvd.Mississauga, ON L5T 2V5
Canada
Defendant.
CASE NO. 5:15-cv-1182
JUDGE
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiff, Spectrum Diversified Designs, Inc. (“Spectrum”), alleges as follows for its
Complaint against Defendant, Harman, Inc. (“Harman”):
1. Spectrum is organized and existing under the laws of the Ohio and has its principal
place of business at 675 Mondial Parkway, Streetsboro, OH 44241.
2. Upon information and belief, Harman, Inc. a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of Canada, and has its principal place of business at 310 Annagem Blvd., Mississauga, ON
L5T 2V5, Canada.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3.
This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United
States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., as is more fully set forth below.
4.
This Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 15. PageID #: 1
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
2/57
2
5. Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Harman
because Harman has advertised, marketed, distributed or sold infringing merchandise within this
district. This Court also has personal jurisdiction because Harman has engaged in acts or omissions
within this district causing injury, has engaged in acts or omissions outside of this district causing injury
within this district, has manufactured or distributed products used or consumed within this district in
the ordinary course of trade, has entered contracts with residents of this district, or has otherwise made
or established contacts with this district sufficient to permit the exercise of personal jurisdiction. This
Court also has personal jurisdiction because Harman has placed infringing goods into the stream of
commerce knowing that they would be sold in this district by, for example, by T.J. Maxx and
HomeGoods stores.
6. Venue in this District is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1400(b) because
defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction, and because the infringing products have been offered for
sale in this judicial district.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
7.
Spectrum is
engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing and selling products,
many of which are houseware items.
8. Harman claims to be an industry leader in home fashions and sells a variety of metal
wire home goods to retailers throughout the United States. Such goods include: Napkin Holder
(Product No. 2783007); Basket w/ Handles (Product No. 2783207); Round Basket (Product No.
2783307); Basket (S) (Product No. 2783507); Basket (L) (Product No. 2783707); Square Basket
(Product No. 2783807); Wire Organizer (Product No. 278229); Standard (Product No. 2787371); and
Deco (Product No. 2757526) (collectively, the “Harman Products”).
9. On information and belief, Harman has offered for sale and sold the Harman
Products in this judicial district.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 15. PageID #: 2
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
3/57
3
10. Harman has offered for sale and sold the Harman Products to retailers with
knowledge that the Harman Products would be offered for sale and sold in this judicial district.
11. Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D576,825 (“the ’825
Patent”), entitled “PAPER ROLL PRODUCT HOLDER.” The ’825 Patent was duly and legally
issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 16, 2008. The ’825 Patent is
still in force and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’825 Patent is
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
12.
Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D582,709 (“the ’709
Patent”), entitled “PAPER TOWEL HOLDER.” The ’709 Patent was duly and legally issued by the
United States Patent and Trademark Office on December 16, 2008. The ’709 Patent is still in force
and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’709 Patent is attached
hereto as Exhibit B.
13. Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D634,122 (“the ’122
Patent”), entitled “BASKET.” The ’122 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office on March 15, 2011. The ’122 Patent is still in force and effect and is presumed
valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’122 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
14. Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D637,000 (“the ’000
Patent”), entitled “BASKET.” The ’000 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office on May 3, 2011. The ’000 Patent is still in force and effect and is presumed
valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’000 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
15.
Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D639,613 (“the ’613
Patent”), entitled “ARTICLE HOLDER.” The ’613 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United
States Patent and Trademark Office on June 14, 2011. The ’613 Patent is still in force and effect and is
presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’613 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit E.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 15. PageID #: 3
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
4/57
4
16. Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D645,671 (“the ’671
Patent”), entitled “HOLDER FOR HOUSEHOLD ARTICLES.” The ’671 Patent was duly and
legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 27, 2011. The ’671
Patent is still in force and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’671
Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit F.
17.
Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D646,933 (“the ’933
Patent”), entitled “FRUIT BOWL AND FRUIT TREE.” The ’933 Patent was duly and legally issued
by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 18, 2011. The ’933 Patent is still in
force and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’933 Patent is
attached hereto as Exhibit G.
18. Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D648,131 (“the ’131
Patent”), entitled “BASKET.” The ’131 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office on November 8, 2011. The ’131 Patent is still in force and effect and is
presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’131 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit H.
COUNT I
INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’825 PATENT
19. Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-18 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
20. Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’825 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Standard paper roll product holder (Product No.
2787371).
21. A comparison of the paper roll product holder of the ’825 patent to the infringing
Standard paper roll product holder is shown below.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 15. PageID #: 4
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
5/57
5
The ’825 Patent – Paper Roll Product Holder Standard Paper Roll Product Holder
22. Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’825 Patent.
23. Harman’s infringement of the ’825 Patent has been willful.
24. Haman’s infringement of the ’825 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
25. The infringement of the ’825 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
COUNT IIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’709 PATENT
26. Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-25 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
27. Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’709 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Deco paper roll product holder (Product No.
2757526).
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 15. PageID #: 5
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
6/57
6
28. A comparison of the paper roll product holder of the ’709 patent to the infringing
Deco paper roll product holder is shown below.
The ’709 Patent – Paper Roll Product Holder Deco Paper Roll Product Holder
29. Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’709 Patent.
30. Harman’s infringement of the ’709 Patent has been willful.
31. Haman’s infringement of the ’709 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
32. The infringement of the ’709 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
COUNT IIIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’122 PATENT
33.
Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-32 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
34. Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’122 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Basket (S) (Product No. 2783507).
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 6 of 15. PageID #: 6
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
7/57
7
35. A comparison of the basket of the ’122 patent to the infringing basket is shown below.
The ’122 Patent – Basket Basket (S)
36.
Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’122 Patent.
37.
Harman’s infringement of the ’122 Patent has been willful.
38.
Haman’s infringement of the ’122 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
39.
The infringement of the ’122 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
COUNT IVINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’000 PATENT
40. Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-39 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
41.
Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’000 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Basket w/ Handles (Product No. 2783207).
42. A comparison of the basket of the ’000 patent to the infringing basket is shown below.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 7 of 15. PageID #: 7
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
8/57
8
The ’000 Patent – Basket Basket w/ Handles
43.
Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’000 Patent.
44.
Harman’s infringement of the ’000 Patent has been willful.
45.
Haman’s infringement of the ’000 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
46.
The infringement of the ’000 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
COUNT VINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’613 PATENT
47. Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-46 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
48.
Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’613 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Wire Organizer (Product No. 278229).
49. A comparison of the article holder of the ’613 patent to the infringing Wire Organizer
is shown below.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 8 of 15. PageID #: 8
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
9/57
9
The ’613 Patent – Article Holder Wire Organizer
50. Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’613 Patent.
51.
Harman’s infringement of the ’613 Patent has been willful.
52.
Haman’s infringement of the ’613 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
53.
The infringement of the ’613 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
COUNT VIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’671 PATENT
54. Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-53 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
55. Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’671 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Napkin Holder (Product No. 2783007).
56. A comparison of the napkin holder of the ’671 patent to the infringing Napkin Holder
is shown below.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 9 of 15. PageID #: 9
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
10/57
10
The ’671 Patent – Napkin Holder Napkin Holder
57. Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’671 Patent.
58. Harman’s infringement of the ’671 Patent has been willful.
59. Haman’s infringement of the ’671 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
60. The infringement of the ’671 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
COUNT VIIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’933 PATENT
61. Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-60 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
62. Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’933 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Round Basket (Product No. 2783307).
63. A comparison of the paper roll product holder of the ’933 patent to the infringing fruit
bowl is shown below.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 10 of 15. PageID #: 10
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
11/57
11
The ’933 Patent – Fruit Bowl Round Basket
64.
Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’933 Patent.
65. Harman’s infringement of the ’933 Patent has been willful.
66. Haman’s infringement of the ’933 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
67. The infringement of the ’933 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
COUNT VIIIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’131 PATENT
68. Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-67 above as if each
were separately set forth at length herein.
69. Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’131 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)
by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Basket (L) (Product No. 2783707) and the Square
Basket (Product No. 2783807).
70. Comparisons of the baskets of the ’131 patent to the infringing baskets are shown
below.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 11 of 15. PageID #: 11
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
12/57
12
The ’131 Patent – Basket Basket (L)
The ’131 Patent – Basket Square Basket
71.
Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’131 Patent.
72.
Harman’s infringement of the ’131 Patent has been willful.
73.
Haman’s infringement of the ’131 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum
to suffer injury and economic damages.
74.
The infringement of the ’131 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to
Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing
activities are enjoined by this Court.
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 12 of 15. PageID #: 12
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
13/57
13
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Spectrum respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’825 Patent;
B.
Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’709 Patent;
C.
Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’122 Patent;
D.
Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’000 Patent;
E.
Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’613 Patent;
F.
Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’671 Patent;
G. Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’933 Patent;
H. Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’131 Patent;
I. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’825 Patent for the full term thereof;
J. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’709 Patent for the full term thereof;
K. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’122 Patent for the full term thereof;
L. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’000 Patent for the full term thereof;
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 13 of 15. PageID #: 13
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
14/57
14
M. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’613 Patent for the full term thereof;
N.
Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’671 Patent for the full term thereof;
O.
Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’933 Patent for the full term thereof;
P. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,
agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the
’131 Patent for the full term thereof;
Q. Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’825 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
R.
Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’709 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
S. Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’122 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
T. Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’000 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
U.
Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’613 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
V. Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’671 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 14 of 15. PageID #: 14
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
15/57
15
W. Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’933 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
X. Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of
the ’131 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;
Y.
Declare that this is an exceptional case and award of attorneys’ fees, expenses,
disbursements, and costs of this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;
Z.
Order Defendant to pay costs, pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest to
Spectrum;
AA. Order an accounting for any infringing sales not presented at trial and award additional
damages for any such infringing sales; and
BB. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff requests a trial by jury of any issue triable as of right pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dated: June 12, 2015 /s/ Mark C. JohnsonMark C. Johnson (0072625)[email protected] B. Fleming (0064644)[email protected], Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Avenue, 19th FloorCleveland, Ohio 44115
216-621-1113 (telephone)216-621-6165 (facsimile)
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 15 of 15. PageID #: 15
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
16/57
( 1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent ( 1 0 )
P a t e n t N o . :
Goodman
t
a ] .
USO0D576825S
US D 5 7 6 , 8 2 5 S
( 4 5 )
Date
o f P a t e n t : * 1 , S e p .
1 6 , 2008
( 5 4 )
( 7 5 )
( 7 3 )
( * * )
( 2 1 )
( 2 2 )
( 5 1 )
( 5 2 )
( 5 8 )
( 5 6 )
PAPER
ROLL PRODUCT
HOLDER
I n v e n t o r s : S h e l d o n
H .
Goodman, S o l o n , OH
U S ) ;
Omer
.
S a z i r ,
C l e v e l a n d ,
OH
U S )
A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m
D i v e r s i ? e d D e s i g n s , I n c . ,
S t r e e t s b o r o ,
OH
U S )
Term:
14
Years
A p p l .
N o . : 2 9 / 2 9 7 , 4 8 4
F i l e d : N o v . 1 3 , 2007
LOC 8) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-02
US.
l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. D6/521
Field of
Classi?cation Search . . . . . . . .
. .
D6/546i550,
D 6 / 5 l 8 i 5 l 9 , 5 2 2* 5 2 4 ;
D 8 / 3 0 0 ,
3 0 3 , 3 1 5 * 3 2 1 ;
l 0 8 / 2 8 i 2 9 ; 2 1 1 / 1 3 . 1 , 1 6 ,
6 0 . 1 , 8 6 . 0 1 , 8 7 . 0 1 ,
2 1 1 / 8 8 . 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 4 , 1 0 0 , 1 0 5 . 1 * 1 0 5 . 2 , 1 2 3 ,
2 1 1 / 1 8 1 . 1 ,
1 8 2 ; 2 4 8 / 1 7 5 , 1 7 6 . 1 ,
2 5 1 , 3 0 2 ;
1 6 / 1 1 0 . 1 , 4 1 2 ,
4 1 5 ; 2 4 2 / 5 7 0 , 5 9 0 ,
595598
S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e
s e a r c h h i s t o r y .
References Cited
U . S .
PATENT
DOCUMENTS
D390,054 S * 2/1998 Goodman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D6/522
D474,634
S * 5/2003
Ancona
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. D6/522
D512,590 S *
12/2005 Goodman t a l . . . . .
. . D6/521
D517,846
S * 3/2006
G o odm an
t
a l . D6/521
D522,292
S * 6/2006
G o odm an t a l . D6/521
D555,954 S *
11/2007
Yang t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/521
* c i t e d by examiner
P r i m a r y ExamineriBrian
N i n s o n
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,
A g e n t ,
o r FirmiPearne
ordon
LLP
( 5 7 )
CLAIM
The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r
a
p a p e r
r o l l
p r o d u c t h o l d e r , a s
shoWn and d e s c r i b e d .
DESCRIPTION
F I G . 1
i s a p e r s p e c t i v e vieW
o f
a p a p e r r o l l
p r o d u c t
h o l d e r ,
showing o u r neW
d e s i g n ;
F I G . 2 i s a f r o n t
e l e v a t i o n a l vieW
h e r e o f ;
F I G . 3 i s a s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ;
F I G . 4 i s a t o p p l a n
v i e W
t h e r e o f ;
FIG. 5 i s a p e r s p e c t i v e vieW
of
a
second
embodiment
of
a
p a p e r r o l l
p r o d u c t
h o l d e r , W h e r e i n t h e b r o k e n l i n e s form n o
p a r t o f t h e c l a i m e d d e s i g n a n d t h e
p o r t i o n s
o f t h e p e r i p h e r a l
member
h a t
a r e
shoWn
broken
aWay
n d i c a t e
t h a t
t h e l e n g t h s
o f e a c h o f h e
b r o k e n
p e r i p h e r a l member o r t i o n s d o n o t
f o r m
a p a r t
o f
t h e d e s i g n ; a n d ,
FIG.
6
i s
a
p e r s p e c t i v e vieW
of
t h i r d embodiment
of paper
r o l l p r o d u c t h o l d e r , W h e r e i n t h e b r o k e n l i n e s i n t h e c e n t r a l
v e r t i c a l e l e m e n t s i n d i c a t e
t h e
s p e c i ? c h e i g h t o f
t h e
e l e m e n t s
and
t h e
p a p e r p r o d u ct r o l l
h o l d e r d o n o t form a p a r t o f t h e
d e s i g n , a n d t h e p o r t i o n s
o f
t h e p e r i p h e r a l
b a s e member h a t
a r e
b r o k e n
aWay n d i c a t e t h a t
t h e
l e n g t h
o f e a c h o f t h e b r o k e n
p e r i p h e r a l b a s e
member
o r t i o n s d o e s n o t f o r m a p a r t
o f
t h e
d e s i g n .
The d o t t e d l i n e d i s c l o s u r e o f
e l e m e n t s
i n t h e v i e W s
i s
f o r
i l l u s t r a t i v e
p u r p o s e s
o n l y and f o r m s no
p a r t
o f
t h e
c l a i m e d
d e s i g n .
1 C l a i m ,
3
Drawing S h e e t s
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 4. PageID #: 16
A
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
17/57
US. Patent S e p . 1 6 ,
2 0 0 8
S h e e t
1
o f 3
US D576,825
S
( ( ( ( (
FIG.2
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 4. PageID #: 17
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
18/57
US. Patent S e p . 1 6 ,
2 0 0 8
S h e e t 2 o f 3
US D576,825
S
3 3 )
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 4. PageID #: 18
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
19/57
US.
Patent
S e p . 1 6 ,
2 0 0 8
S h e e t
3 o f 3
US D576,825
S
F|13.6
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 4. PageID #: 19
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
20/57
USO0D582709S
( 1 2 ) United States Design
Patent
( 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . : US D 5 8 2 , 7 0 9
S
Goodman t
a ] . ( 4 5 )
Date
o f
P a t e n t : i i i ,
D e c . 1 6 ,
2008
(54)
PAPER
TOWEL
HOLDER D5l7,846 S *
3/2006 Goodman
t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/52l
D522,292
S * 6/2006 G o odm an t a l . D6/52l
Inventors:
S heldon HI Goodman’ Solon’ D545,599 S * 7/2007 Yu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 1 3 6 / 5 2 1
Omer
L
sazir
Cleveland
OH
Us)
D555,954
S
*
1 1 / 2 0 0 7
Yang
t
a l .
. D6/521
’ ’ D562,042 s
*
2/2008 Shek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D6/521
( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m
D i v e r s i ? e d
D e s i g n s , I n c . , *
c i t e d b y
e x a m i n e r
S t r e e t s b o r o , OH S
( U ) P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i B r i a n N i n s o n
( * * )
T e r m ;
1 4 Years ( 7 4 )
A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , o r
FirmiPearne ordon
LLP
( 2 1 )
A p p l .
N o . :
2 9 / 3 1 9 , 6 4 8
( 5 7 )
CLAIM
( 2 2 ) F i l e d ; J
1 1 1 , 1 2 ,
2008 The
r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a p a p e r t o w e l
h o l d e r ,
a s
shoWn
and
d e s c r i b e d .
(51) LOC 8 ) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20-02
(52) us. l.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/521
_ ' DESCRIPTION '
( 5 8 ) Field
of Class i?cation Search
. . . . . . . .
. .
D6/5l8i523;
FIG- 1 1 S
a
Perspecnve VIeW Of Paper towel h o l d e r ,
showlng
2 0 6 / 3 8 9 , 3 9 1 ; 2 1 1 / 1 3 1 , 5 9 . 1 , 4 5 , 8 9 0 . 1 ; O u r
new
d e s i g n ;
2 4 2 / 5 7 0 ,
5 9 0 ;
2 4 8 / 3 0 9 1 , 3 0 9 - 2
F I G .
2 i s a
f r o n t
e l e v a t i o n a l V i e w t h e r e o f ;
S e e
a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r
c o m p l e t e
s e a r c h h i s t o r y . F I G ‘
3
i s
a r e a r
e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f ;
( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d
F I G .
4 i s
a
s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l
View
t h e r e o f ;
U _ S _ PATENT DOCUMENTS F I G . 5 i s a t o p p l a n
V i e w
t h e r e o f ; a n d ,
D405,304 s
*
2/1999 Goodman
t
a l . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/522
FIG'
6
i s
a bottom Plan View t h e r e o f ‘
D474,635
S * 5/2003 Ancona . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D479,072 S
*
9/2003 Duncan t
a l .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
D6/522 1 Clai m, 3 Drawing Sheets
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 4. PageID #: 20
B
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
21/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 4. PageID #: 21
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
22/57
US. Patent
D e c . 1 6 , 2 0 0 8
S h e e t
2
o f 3
US D582,709 S
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 4. PageID #: 22
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
23/57
US. Patent
D e c . 1 6 , 2 0 0 8 S h e e t 3
o f 3
US D582,709 S
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 4. PageID #: 23
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
24/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 8. PageID #: 24
C
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
25/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 8. PageID #: 25
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
26/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 8. PageID #: 26
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
27/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 8. PageID #: 27
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
28/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 8. PageID #: 28
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
29/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 6 of 8. PageID #: 29
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
30/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 7 of 8. PageID #: 30
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
31/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 8 of 8. PageID #: 31
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
32/57
( 1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent ( 1 0 )
P a t e n t N o . :
Goodman t a l .
USO0D637000S
US D 6 3 7 , 0 0 0 S
( 5 4 )
( 7 5 )
( 7 3 )
( * * )
( 2 1 )
( 2 2 )
( 6 2 )
( 5 1 )
( 5 2 )
( 5 8 )
( 5 6 )
BASKET
I n v e n t o r s :
S h e l d o n
H .
Goodman,
S o l o n , OH U S ) ;
Omer
.
S a z i r ,
C l e v e l a n d ,
OH
U S ) ;
E l i z a b e t h A . C h o , S t r o n g s v i l l e ,
OH
( U s )
A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m
D i v e r s i ? e d D e s i g n s , I n c . ,
S t r e e t s b o r o ,
OH U S )
Term: 14 Years
A p p 1 . N o . : 2 9 / 3 8 0 , 7 3 9
F i l e d : D e c . 1 0 , 2010
R e l a t e d US.
p p l i c a t i o n
Data
D i v i s i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 9 , ? l e d
on
u g .
1 4 ,
2 0 1 0 .
LOC 9) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03-01
US. l. .................................... . . .
Field of Class i?cation Search
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . D3/304,
D 3 / 3 0 6 i 3 0 9 ,
3 1 4 ,
3 1 5 ; D 7 / 6 0 l i 6 0 2 ; 2 2 0 / 4 8 5 ,
2 2 0 / 5 8 6 ; D 6 / 5 6 6 i 5 6 7 , 5 3 7 , 5 4 0 , 5 7 4 , 5 7 2 ,
D 6 / 5 1 0 ;
2 1 1 / 1 3 . 1 , 4 1 . 3 , 4 1 . 4 ,
8 6 . 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 1 ,
2 1 1 / 1 3 4 , 1 2 6 . 1
S e e
a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e
f o r c o m p l e t e
s e a r c h
h i s t o r y .
References
Cited
U . S .
PATENTDOCUMENTS
D193,215 S * 7/1962 Frederick
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. D3/306
4,337,872
A 7/1982
Wright
. .
D296,601
S
*
7/1988
D382,710
S 8 / 1 9 9 7
D399,381 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 8
D412,080
S 7 / 1 9 9 9
Chap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. D3/ 6
Henderson
H o e r n i g
E m e r y
( 4 5 ) Date o f
P a t e n t :
* 9 : May
,
2011
D419,771 S 2 / 2 0 0 0 Chen
D420,513 S 2 / 2 0 0 0
Chen
D434,718 S 1 2 / 2 0 0 0 K r e i s l e r
D443,159 S 6 / 2 0 0 1
F e r r e r B e l t r a n
D444,012 S 6 / 2 0 0 1
F e r r e r
B e l t r a n
D472,750 S
4 / 2 0 0 3 C l u c a s
D477,144 S
7 / 2 0 0 3
Remmers
D 5 0 7 , 1 0 8
S 7 / 2 0 0 5 S u e r o , J r .
D526,454 S *
8/2006
Plikuhn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D32/55
D578,762 S *
10/2008
S m i t h
e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D3/306
D608,598
S
1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t
a 1 .
D608,599 S
1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t
a 1 .
D616,252 S 5 / 2 0 1 0
Goodman
t
a 1 .
D616,254 S 5 / 2 0 1 0
Goodman
t
a 1 .
D616,255 S 5 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t
a 1 .
D622,107
S
8 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t
a 1 .
D629,610 S *
12/2010 Goodman t
a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D3/306
D629,656 S * 12/2010
Goodman
t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D7/601
*
c i t e d by
examiner
Primary E xaminer lizabeth
A
lbert
A s s i s t a n t
Examiner
*
elley
A
onnelly
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , or Firm
* earne
ordon
LLP
( 5 7 ) CLAIM
The
r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r
a
b a s k e t ,
a s shown
and
d e s c r i b e d .
DESCRIPTION
FIG.
1
i s
a
p e r s p e c t i v e view of
a
b a s k e t showing our
new
d e s i g n ;
F I G .
2 i s a t o p p l a n v i e w t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
3 i s a
f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view
h e r e o f ;
F I G . 4 i s
a
r i g h t
s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l view
t h e r e o f , t h e
l e f t s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l v i e w
b e i n g i d e n t i c a l ; a n d ,
F I G .
5 i s a
bottom
p l a n
view
t h e r e o f .
The d o t t e d - l i n e s h o w i n g i n t h e
d r a w i n g s
i l l u s t r a t e s
e n v i r o n
m e n t a l m a t t e r
and f o r m s
no
p a r t
o f
t h e
c l a i m e d
d e s i g n .
1
C l a i m ,
2
Drawing S h e e t s
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 3. PageID #: 32
D
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
33/57
US. Patent May , 2 0 1 1
S h e e t 1
0 1 2
US D637,000
S
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 3. PageID #: 33
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
34/57
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 3. PageID #: 34
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
35/57
USO0D639613S
( 1 2 )
United States Design
Patent ( 1 0 )
P a t e n t N o . : US D 6 3 9 , 6 1 3 S
Goodman
t a l . ( 4 5 )
Date
o f
P a t e n t : 4 *
J u n . 1 4 , 2011
( 5 4 )
AR T I CL E
HOLDER ( 5 6 )
R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d
( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : S h e l d o n H .
Goodman,
S o l o n , OH U S ) ;
US‘
PATENT
DOCUMENTS
- _ D387,949 S
*
12/1997
Bentson
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D7/409
01 “ ‘ s a w’ l e v e l a n d ’ O _ H ms)’ D 4 2 l , 0 6 2 s
*
2 / 2 0 0 0 G o o d m a n e t a 1 . 1 3 1 9 / 9 0
Elizabeth A. Cho, S t r o n g s v 1 l l e ,
OH D 4 2 1 , 2 7 3
S
*
2 / 2 0 0 0
Goodman
t
a 1 . Dl9/90
(Us) D555,203
S
*
1 1 / 2 0 0 7
Goodmanetal.
D19/90
D568,056 S * 5/2008 Yarborough
. . . . . . . . . . .
D6/317
_
D582,697 S
*
12/2008 Goodman et a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/462
( 7 3 ) A s s 1 g n e e : S p e c t r u m
D i v e r s i ? e d
D e s i g n s ,
I n c . ,
* C i t e d b y
e x a m i n e r
S t r e e t s b o r o , OH
U )
Primary
Examiner an
Simmons
( * * ) Term;
14
Years A s s i s t a n t Examiner* ana L i p o s
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t ,
or
Firm
*
earne
ordon
LLP
( 2 1 )
A p p l .
N o . :
2 9 / 3 6 3 , 9 4 6
( 5 7 )
CLAIM
We
c l a i m t h e o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r
an
a r t i c l e h o l d e r , a s
( 2 2 ) F i l e d : J u n .
1 6 ,
2 0 1 0 shoWn a n d d e s c r i b e d .
(51) LOC 9 )
Cl.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 07-06
DESCRIPTION
( 5 2 )
US.
l .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
D7/632; D6/458;
D19/90
F I G .
1
i s
a
t o p , f r o n t ,
r i g h t
s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o f a n
a r t i c l e
0f Classi?cation
Search . . . . . . . . .
. . holder Showing our
new
design;
D 7 / 6 3 l i 6 3 2 ,
6 3 7 ,
7 0 4 ; D 6 / 4 5 8 , 4 6 2 , 5 6 6 ; F I G . 2 i s a
t o p
p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;
2 2 0 / 4 8 5 ,
5 9 1 ;
2 1 1 / 1 8 1 . 1 , 8 5 . 3 1 , 1 3 . 1 , 1 1 ,
F I G - 3 1 S a b o t t o m
p l a n
v l e w t h e r e o f ;
2 1 1 / 4 1 . 1 4 4 1 . 4 , 1 2 6 . 9 , 1 3 3 . 5 ; D 3 / 3 0 6 ;
D 1 9 / 6 5 ,
F I G ' 4 1 5 a
1 1 0 m
e l e v a i l o n Y l e W ‘ h e r e o f ’ a n d ’
FIG.
5 s a s 1 d e elevat1on
v 1 e W t h e r e o f .
1 3 1 9 / 7 5 , 8 6 ,
9 0
S e e
a p p l i c a t i o n
? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y . 1
C l a i m ,
2
Drawing S h e e t s
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 3. PageID #: 35
E
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
36/57
US.
Patent
J u n . 1 4
2 0 1 1
S h e e t
1 o f 2
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 3. PageID #: 36
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
37/57
US. Patent
J u n . 1 4 , 2 0 1 1
S h e e t
2
o f 2
US D639,613 S
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 3. PageID #: 37
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
38/57
USO0D645671S
( 1 2 )
United States Design
Patent ( 1 0 )
P a t e n t N o . : US D 6 4 5 , 6 7 1
S
G o od m an e t
a l .
( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : * 9 :
S e p .
2 7 ,
2011
(54) HOLDER
FOR HOUSEHOLDARTICLES D634,121 S
* 3/2011 Goodman t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D3/306
2 0 0 9 / 0 0 6 5 4 5 2
A1*
3 / 2 0 0 9 S m i t h 2 1 1 / 1 1
( 7 5 )
I n v e n t o r s : Sheldon H. Goodman, o l o n , OH
U S ) ; 20 0 9 / 0 0 6 5 4 5 3
A 1* 3 / 2 0 0 9 S m l t h
" " " " " " " " " " " " " "
2 1 1 / 1 1
Omer
.
S a z i r ,
C l e v e l a n d ,
OH
U S ) ;
*
C i t e d
by e X a m i n e r
E l i z a b e t h
A .
C h o ,
S t r o n g s v i l l e , OH
(Us) Primary Examiner* ary Ann a l a b r e s e
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,
A g e n t , or
Firm
*
earne
ordon LLP
( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m D i v e r s i ? e d D e s i g n s , I n c . ,
S t r e e t s b o r o , OH U S ) ( 5 7 ) CLAIM
The
r n a m e n t a l
d e s i g n
f o r
a h o l d e r
f o r household
r t i c l e s ,
a s
( * * ) T e r m ; 1 4 Years
shown
a n d d e s c r i b e d .
( 2 1 )
A p p l .
N o . :
2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 6 DESCRIPTION
( 2 2 )
F l l e d : Aug‘ 1 4 ’ 2010 F I G . 1
i s
a p e r s p e c t i v e v i e w o f a
h o l d e r
f o r h o u s e h o l d a r t i c l e s
( 5 1 ) LOC 9 ) C l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06-04 Showing our
new
e s i g n ;
( 5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 6 / 3 6 2
FIG_
2 i s a t o p plan View h e r e o f ;
( 5 8 )
Field of
Classi?cation
Search
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
1 3 6 / 3 9 6 ,
FIG,
3 i s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l
view
h e r e o f ;
D 6 / 4 4 9 ,
4 5 0 ,
4 5 4 * 4 6 9 ,
5 6 6 ; 2 1 1 / 1 ,
1 1 ,
1 3 1 , F I G .
4
i s
a
r i g h t
s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l
v i e w
t h e r e o f ,
t h e
l e f t
s i d e
2 1 1 / 2 2 ,
4 1 . 1 , 4 1 . 2 , 8 5 . 3 1 , 8 6 . 0 1 , 1 3 4 , 1 9 1 . 1 ;
e l e v a t i o n a l V i e w b e i n g i d e n t i c a l ;
1 3 7 / 6 0 1 ,
6 3 1 ; 1 3 1 9 / 9 0 ,
9 2 ;
1 3 3 / 3 0 4 , 3 0 6
F I G , 5 i s a
b o t t o m
p l a n
v i e w
t h e r e o f ;
S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r C o m p l e t e S e a r c h h i s t o r y . F I G . 6
i s
a p e r s p e c t i v e v i e w o f a s e c o n d embodiment o f t h e
d e s i g n shown n F I G . 1 ;
( 5 6 )
R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d
F I G .
7 i s a t o p p l a n
v i e w t h e r e o f ;
F I G . 8
i s
a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ;
U ~ S ~
PATENTDOCUMENTS F I G .
9
i s
a r i g h t
s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l view t h e r e o f , t h e
l e f t
s i d e
D436,463 S * 1 / 2 0 0 1 Goodman t
a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . D6/462 e l e v a t i o n a l view being
i d e n t i c a l ;
and,
D453,273
S * 2/2002 Goodman t
a l .4 8 4 , 0 0 8
S * 12/2003 Goodman t
a l .
,948,621 B1 9/2005 Lassanske e t
a l . . .
. .
13575554
S
> 1
8/2008 C a l a b r i a e t
a 1 ‘
“ “ 1 3 6 / 4 6 2
mental matter and
forms no p a r t of the
clalmed
des1gn.
D583,589
S
*
12/2008
G o odm an t a l .
D6/462
D583,872 S
*
12/2008
Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . Dl9/90 1 Clai m, 4 Drawing Sheets
~ ~
1 3 6 / 4 6 2
FIG.
10
s
a
bottom plan view
h e r e o f .
The r o k e n l i n e s s h o w i n g
i n
t h e
d r a w i n g s
i l l u s t r a t e s
e n v i r o n
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 5. PageID #: 38
F
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
39/57
US
D 6 4 5 , 6 7 1
S
e p .
S . P a t e n t
FIG. 1
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 5. PageID #: 39
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
40/57
US. Patent S e p . 2 7 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 2
o f 4 US
D645,671 S
( I . 5 1
i f ’
f’
y
I
I n I J
L i L
FIG. 2
S E i n
: L
‘ f k x
( 1 1 2 1 1 1 : i i i i i i i i i i i i i i f i 7 ‘
FIG 3 FIG 4
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 5. PageID #: 40
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
41/57
US
D 6 4 5 , 6 7 1
S
S . P a t e n t
FIG. 6
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 5. PageID #: 41
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
42/57
US. Patent S e p . 2 7 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t
4 o f 4 US
D645,671 S
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 5. PageID #: 42
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
43/57
( 1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent ( 1 0 )
P a t e n t N o . :
Goodman t a l .
USO0D646933S
US
D 6 4 6 , 9 3 3
S
( 4 5 )
Date o f
P a t e n t : * 1 .
O c t .
1 8 , 2011
( 5 4 )
( 7 5 )
( 7 3 )
( * * )
( 2 1 )
( 2 2 )
( 5 1 )
( 5 2 )
( 5 8 )
( 5 6 )
FRUIT
BOWL
ND FRUIT
TREE
I n v e n t o r s :
S h e l d o n
H .
Goodman,
S o l o n , OH U S ) ;
Omer
.
S a z i r ,
C l e v e l a n d ,
OH
U S ) ;
E l i z a b e t h A . C h o , S t r o n g s v i l l e ,
OH
( U s )
A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m
D i v e r s i ? e d
D e s i g n s , I n c . ,
S t r e e t s b o r o ,
OH
U S )
Term: 14 Years
A p p 1 . N o . : 2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 5
F i l e d :
A u g . 1 4 , 2 0 1 0
LOC 9) Cl. . . . . . .
US.
l.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
Field
of Classi?cation
Search
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
D7/ 01,
D 7 / 6 0 2 ,
6 2 9 , 7 0 4 , 4 0 9 ,
5 8 4 5 8 7 ,
5 0 0 ;
D 6 / 5 2 5 ,
D 6 / 5 6 6 ,
5 6 7 , 5 1 1 , 5 7 2 , 5 7 4 ,
5 3 7 , 5 4 0 ;
D 1 9 / 7 6 ;
D 3 / 3 0 4 ,
3 0 6 ;
2 1 1 / 1 8 1 1 , 1 3 . 1 , 4 1 . 3 , 4 1 . 4 ,
2 1 1 / 8 6 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 1 ; 2 2 0 / 5 7 4 i 5 7 5
S e e
a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r
c o m p l e t e
s e a r c h
h i s t o r y .
References Cited
U . S . PATENTDOCUMENTS
D274,880
S
*
7/1984
Bentson339,266
S
* 9/1993
Lockett
.
D371,228 S * 6/1996
Monin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
D7/409
.. D7/409
D7/601
D446,688 S
*
8/2001 Vanello
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
D7/601
D462,422
S * 9/2002
Conner D3/306
D479,098 S
*
9/2003 Ancona . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D7/601
D519,325
S * 4/2006 G o odm an
t a 1 . D7/601
D567,030
S
*
4/2008
G o odm an t a 1 . D7/601
D569,691 S * 5/2008 G o odm an t a 1 . D7/601
D578,762 S * 10/2008 Smith e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
D6/566
D589,304 S * 3/2009
Goodman
t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D7/601
* c i t e d by examiner
Primary Examiner erry Wallace
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , or Firm *
earne
ordon LLP
( 5 7 ) CLAIM
The
r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a f r u i t bowl and r u i t t r e e , a s
shown
and d e s c r i b e d .
DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 i s
a
p e r s p e c t i v e view of
f r u i t bowl
showing
our new
d e s i g n ;
F I G .
2
i s
a
t o p p l a n
v i e w
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
3
i s
a
f r a g m e n t a r y v i e w ,
on
an
e n l a r g e d
s c a l e ,
o f an
a l t e r n a t i v e mesh m a t e r i a l used t o
form
t h e bottom
w a l l
d e n o t e d b y t h e number i n F I G . 2 ;
F I G . 4 i s a f r o n t
e l e v a t i o n a l view
h e r e o f ;
F I G . 5 i s
a s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l view t h e r e o f ; a n d ,
F I G . 6 i s a bottom p l a n
view
t h e r e o f .
The d o t t e d - l i n e s h o w i n g i n t h e
d r a w i n g s
i l l u s t r a t e s
e n v i r o n
m e n t a l
m a t t e r a n d f o r m s no
p a r t
o f t h e c l a i m e d d e s i g n .
1
C l a i m ,
2
Drawing S h e e t s
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 3. PageID #: 43
G
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
44/57
US. Patent
0a. 8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 1
0 1 2
US D646,933 S
FIG.1
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 3. PageID #: 44
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
45/57
S h e e t 2
0 f
2
US
D646,933
S
S. Patent 0 a .
1 8 ,
2 0 1 1
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 3. PageID #: 45
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
46/57
( 1 2 ) United
States
Design Patent ( 1 0 )
P a t e n t N o . :
Goodman t a l .
USO0D648131S
US D 6 4 8 , 1 3 1 S
( 4 5 )
Date
o f P a t e n t : * 1 , *Nov.
8 ,
2011
( 5 4 )
( 7 5 )
( 7 3 )
( * )
( * * )
( 2 1 )
( 2 2 )
( 6 3 )
( 5 1 )
( 5 2 )
( 5 8 )
( 5 6 )
BASKET
I n v e n t o r s : S h e l d o n
H .
Goodman, S o l o n , OH
U S ) ;
Omer
.
S a z i r ,
B r o o k l y n ,
NY
U S ) ;
E l i z a b e t h
A .
C h o ,
S t r o n g s v i l l e , OH
( U s )
A s s i g n e e :
S p e c t r u m
D i v e r s i ? e d
D e s i g n s , I n c . ,
S t r e e t s b o r o ,
OH
U S )
N o t i c e :
T h i s
p a t e n t
i s
s u b j e c t t o a
t e r m i n a l
d i s
c l a i m e r .
Term: 14 Years
A p p 1 . N o . : 2 9 / 3 8 6 , 6 1 3
F i l e d : Mar. , 2 0 1 1
R e l a t e d
US.
p p l i c a t i o n
Data
C o n t i n u a t i o n - i n - p a r t
o f
a p p l i c a t i o n N o .
2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 9 ,
? l e d on Aug. 1 4 , 2 0 1 0 , now a t .
No.
D e s . 6 3 4 , 1 2 2 .
LOC 9) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03-01
US.
l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
D3/306
Field of Class i?cation Search
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . D3/304,
D 3 / 3 0 6 i 3 0 9 ,
3 1 4 , 3 1 5 ;
D 7 / 6 0 l i 6 0 2 ;
2 2 0 / 4 8 5 ,
2 2 0 / 5 8 6 ; D 6 / 5 6 6 i 5 6 7 , 5 3 7 , 5 4 0 , 5 7 4 , 5 7 2 ,
D 6 / 5 1 0 ;
2 1 1 / 1 3 . 1 , 4 1 . 3 , 4 1 . 4 , 8 6 . 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 1 ,
2 1 1 / 1 3 4 , 1 2 6 . 1
S e e
a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e
f o r c o m p l e t e
s e a r c h h i s t o r y .
References Cited
U . S .
PATENTDOCUMENTS
D193,215 S 7 / 1 9 6 2 F r e d r i c k
4 , 3 3 7 , 8 7 2
A 7 / 1 9 8 2 W r i g h t
D 2 9 6 , 6 0 1 S 7 / 1 9 8 8 Chap
D382,710 S 8 / 1 9 9 7
Henderson
D 3 9 9 , 3 8 1 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 8 H o e r n i g
D 4 1 2 , 0 8 0
S 7 / 1 9 9 9
Emery
D419,771
S 2 / 2 0 0 0
Chen
D420,513 S 2 / 2 0 0 0
Chen
D434,718
S 1 2 / 2 0 0 0 K r e i s l e r
D443,159 S 6 / 2 0 0 1
F e r r e r B e l t r a n
D444,012 S
6 / 2 0 0 1
F e r r e r
B e l t r a n
D472,750 S 4 / 2 0 0 3 C l u c a s
D477,144 S 7 / 2 0 0 3
Remmers
D 5 0 7 , 1 0 8 S 7 / 2 0 0 5 S u e r o , J r .
D526,454 S 8 / 2 0 0 6
P l i k u h n
D536,873
S
*
2/2007 Thorsteinsson e t a 1 . . . . . . . .
D3/306
D554,417 S * 11/2007
Thorsteinsson e t
a 1 .
. . . . .
. . D6/566
D5 5 4 , 4 1 9 S *
11/2007
Thompson t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/566
D578,762 S
1 0 / 2 0 0 8 Smith
t
a 1 .
D608,598 S
1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t
a 1 .
D608,599 S 1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman t
a 1 .
D616,252 S 5 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t
a 1 .
D616,254
S
5 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t
a 1 .
D616,255 S 5 / 2 0 1 0
Goodman
t
a 1 .
( C o n t i n u e d )
Primary Ex aminer
liZabeth Albert
A s s i s t a n t Examiner elley
Donnelly
( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t ,
or
Firm
* earne
ordon
LLP
( 5 7 ) CLAIM
The
r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r
a
b a s k e t ,
a s shown
and
d e s c r i b e d .
DESCRIPTION
FIG.
1
i s
a
p e r s p e c t i v e view
of
a
b a s k e t showing our
new
d e s i g n ;
F I G . 2 i s a t o p p l a n
v i e w
t h e r e o f ;
F I G .
3
i s
a
r i g h t
s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l view
t h e r e o f , t h e l e f t
s i d e
e l e v a t i o n a l
v i e w
b e i n g i d e n t i c a l ;
F I G . 4 i s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ;
F I G .
5 i s a b o t t o m p l a n v i e w
t h e r e o f ;
FIG. 6 i s a p e r s p e c t i v e view
of
a
second
embodiment
of
a
modi?ed
q u a r e b a s k e t o f t h e d e s i g n
shown
n
F I G .
1 ;
F I G . 7 i s a t o p p l a n
v i e w
t h e r e o f ;
F I G . 8 i s a f r o n t
and
s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ;
F I G .
9 i s
a bottom
p l a n
view t h e r e o f ;
FIG. 10
i s
a p e r s p e c t i v e
view of
a
t h i r d
embodiment
of
a
modi?ed e c t a n g u l a r b a s k e t o f t h e d e s i g n shown n F I G . 1 ;
F I G . 1 1
i s a t o p p l a n v i e w t h e r e o f ;
F I G . 1 2
i s
a
r i g h t
s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e w , t h e l e f t s i d e e l e v a
t i o n a l v i e w b e i n g
i d e n t i c a l ;
F I G . 1 3 i s
a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ; a n d ,
F I G . 1 4 i s a bottom p l a n
view
h e r e o f .
The d o t t e d - l i n e s h o w i n g i n
t h e d r a w i n g s
i l l u s t r a t e s
e n v i r o n
m e n t a l m a t t e r and f o r m s
no p a r t
o f t h e c l a i m e d d e s i g n .
1 C l a i m ,
6
Drawing S h e e t s
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 8. PageID #: 46
H
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
47/57
US D 6 4 8 , 1 3 1 S
P a g e
2
US. PATENT
DOCUMENTS
D634,121 S *
. D634,122 S
*
D616,680 S * 6/201 0 Snlder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D6/513 13636999 S *
D622,107 S
8 / 2 0 1 0
Goodman t a l . D637’000 S *
D629,610 S 12/2010 Goodman t a l . ’
D629,656
S 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman
t a 1 . *
c i t e d by
examiner
3 / 2 0 1 1
3 / 2 0 1 1
5 / 2 0 1 1
5 / 2 0 1 1
Goodman t a 1 .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
D3/306
Goodman t a 1 .
. .
. D3/306
Goodman t a 1 .
. .
. D3/306
Goodman t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D3/306
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 8. PageID #: 47
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
48/57
US. Patent
N o v .
8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t
1
o f 6
US D648,131 S
FIG.1
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 8. PageID #: 48
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
49/57
US. Patent
N o v .
8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 2 o f 6 US
D648,131 S
1
(v, (m
Kin
F I G .
2
\ N W W W / W
A }
\
FIG
4
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 8. PageID #: 49
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
50/57
US. Patent
N o v .
8 , 2 0 1 1
S h e e t 3
o f 6 US
D648,131 S
F I G .
6
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 8. PageID #: 50
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
51/57
US. P a t e n t
N O V .
8 ,
2 0 1 1
S h e e t
4 0 f
6
K V )
K V
US
D 6 4 8 , 1 3 1
S
FIG. 7
F I G .
8
F I G .
9
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 6 of 8. PageID #: 51
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
52/57
US. Patent
N o v .
8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 5 o f 6
US D648,131 S
F I G . 1 0
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 7 of 8. PageID #: 52
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
53/57
US. Patent
N o v .
8 , 2 0 1 1
S h e e t 6
o f 6 US
D648,131 S
F I G .
11
/ /
F I G . 1 2
F I G . 1 4
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 8 of 8. PageID #: 53
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
54/57
CIVIL COVER SHEET
(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS
(b)
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
(c) (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) (If Known)
I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant
PTF DEF PTF D
(U.S. Government Not a Party) or
and
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
V. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY
PROPERTY RIGHTS
LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY
PERSONAL PROPERTY
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS FEDERAL TAX SUITS
Habeas Corpus:
IMMIGRATION
Other:
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)
(specify)
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity)
VII. REQUESTED IN
COMPLAINT:
CLASS ACTION
DEMAND $
JURY DEMAND:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
IF ANY(See instructions):
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
SPECTRUM DIVERSIFIED DESIGNS, INC.
Portage
Mark C. Johnson; Kyle B. FlemingRenner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP
621 Euclid Ave., 19th Floor, Cleveland Ohio 44115; p:216.621.1113
HARMAN, INC.
35 U.S.C § 271
Design patent infringement
06/12/2015 /s/ Mark C. Johnson
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-9 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 2. PageID #: 54
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
55/57
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
. Civil Categories: (Please check one category only).
1. General Civil
2. Administrative Review/Social Security
3. Habeas Corpus Death Penalty
*If under Title 28, §2255, name the SENTENCING JUDGE:
CASE NUMBER:
I. RELATED OR REFILED CASES. See LR 3.1 which provides in pertinent part: "If an action is filed or removed to this Courtand assigned to a District Judge after which i t is discontinued, dismissed or remanded to a State court, and
subsequently refiled, it shall be assigned to the same Judge who received the initial case assignment without regardfor
the place of holding court in which the case was refiled. Counsel or a party without counsel shall be responsible for
bringing such cases to the attention of the Court by responding to the questions included on the Civil Cover Sheet."
This action is RELATED to another PENDING civil case. This action is REFILED pursuant to LR 3.1.
f applicable, please indicate on page 1 in section VIII, the name of the Judge and case number.
II. In accordance with Local Civil Rule 3.8, actions involving counties in the Eastern Division shall be filed at any of thedivisional offices therein. Actions involving counties in the Western Division shall be filed at the Toledo office. For the
purpose of determining the proper division, and for statistical reasons, the following information is requested.
ANSWER ONE PARAGRAPH ONLY. ANSWER PARAGRAPHS 1 THRU 3 IN ORDER. UPON FINDING WHICH
PARAGRAPH APPLIES TO YOUR CASE, ANSWER IT AND STOP.
(1) Resident defendant. If the defendant resides in a county within this district, please set forth the name of suchcounty
COUNTY:
Corporation For the purpose of answering the above, a corporation is deemed to be a resident of that county in which
it has its principal place of business in that district.
(2) Non-Resident defendant. If no defendant is a resident of a county in this district, please set forth the county
wherein the cause of action arose or the event complained of occurred.COUNTY:
(3) Other Cases. If no defendant is a resident of this district, or if the defendant is a corporation not having a principle
place of business within the district, and the cause of action arose or the event complained of occurred outside
this district, please set forth the county of the plaintiff's residence.
COUNTY:
V. The Counties in the Northern District of Ohio are divided into divisions as shown below. After the county isdetermined in Section III, please check the appropriate division.
EASTERN DIVISION
AKRON (Counties: Carroll, Holmes, Portage, Stark, Summit, Tuscarawas and Wayne) CLEVELAND (Counties: Ashland, Ashtabula, Crawford, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake,
Lorain, Medina and Richland) YOUNGSTOWN (Counties: Columbiana, Mahoning and Trumbull)
WESTERN DIVISION
TOLEDO (Counties: Allen, Auglaize, Defiance, Erie, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, Henry,Huron, Lucas, Marion, Mercer, Ottawa, Paulding, Putnam, Sandusky, Seneca
VanWert, Williams, Wood and Wyandot)
✔
✔
Portage County, OH
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-9 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 2. PageID #: 55
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
56/57
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action
U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
)
))))))
Plaintiff
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant’s name and address)
A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if youare the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,whose name and address are:
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Northern District of Ohio
SPECTRUM DIVERSIFIED DESIGNS, INC.
5:15-cv-1182
HARMAN, INC.
Harman, Inc.310 Annagem Blvd.
Mississauga, ON L5T 2V5Canada
Mark C. Johnson
Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Avenue, 19th Floor Cleveland, Ohio 44115(216) 621-1113
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-10 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 2. PageID #: 56
8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint
57/57
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No.
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))
This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)
was received by me on (date) .
I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)
on (date) ; or
I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or
I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is
designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)
on (date) ; or
I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
Other (specify):
.
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:Server’s signature
Printed name and title
Server’s address
5:15-cv-1182
0.00
Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-10 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 2. PageID #: 57