Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    1/57

    1

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION 

    SPECTRUM DIVERSIFIED DESIGNS, INC.675 Mondial ParkwayStreetsboro, OH 44241

    Plaintiff

     v.

    HARMAN, INC.310 Annagem Blvd.Mississauga, ON L5T 2V5

    Canada

    Defendant.

    CASE NO. 5:15-cv-1182

     JUDGE

     JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

    COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

    Plaintiff, Spectrum Diversified Designs, Inc. (“Spectrum”), alleges as follows for its

    Complaint against Defendant, Harman, Inc. (“Harman”):

    1.  Spectrum is organized and existing under the laws of the Ohio and has its principal

    place of business at 675 Mondial Parkway, Streetsboro, OH 44241.

    2.  Upon information and belief, Harman, Inc. a corporation organized and existing under

    the laws of Canada, and has its principal place of business at 310 Annagem Blvd., Mississauga, ON

    L5T 2V5, Canada.

     JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    3. 

     This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United

    States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq., as is more fully set forth below.

    4. 

     This Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action

    pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 15. PageID #: 1

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    2/57

    2

    5.  Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Harman

    because Harman has advertised, marketed, distributed or sold infringing merchandise within this

    district. This Court also has personal jurisdiction because Harman has engaged in acts or omissions

     within this district causing injury, has engaged in acts or omissions outside of this district causing injury

     within this district, has manufactured or distributed products used or consumed within this district in

    the ordinary course of trade, has entered contracts with residents of this district, or has otherwise made

    or established contacts with this district sufficient to permit the exercise of personal jurisdiction. This

    Court also has personal jurisdiction because Harman has placed infringing goods into the stream of

    commerce knowing that they would be sold in this district by, for example, by T.J. Maxx and

    HomeGoods stores.

    6.   Venue in this District is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1400(b) because

    defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction, and because the infringing products have been offered for

    sale in this judicial district.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    7. 

    Spectrum is 

    engaged in the business of designing, manufacturing and selling products,

    many of which are houseware items.

    8.  Harman claims to be an industry leader in home fashions and sells a variety of metal

     wire home goods to retailers throughout the United States. Such goods include: Napkin Holder

    (Product No. 2783007); Basket w/ Handles (Product No. 2783207); Round Basket (Product No.

    2783307); Basket (S) (Product No. 2783507); Basket (L) (Product No. 2783707); Square Basket

    (Product No. 2783807); Wire Organizer (Product No. 278229); Standard (Product No. 2787371); and

    Deco (Product No. 2757526) (collectively, the “Harman Products”).

    9.  On information and belief, Harman has offered for sale and sold the Harman

    Products in this judicial district.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 15. PageID #: 2

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    3/57

    3

    10.  Harman has offered for sale and sold the Harman Products to retailers with

    knowledge that the Harman Products would be offered for sale and sold in this judicial district.

    11.  Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D576,825 (“the ’825

    Patent”), entitled “PAPER ROLL PRODUCT HOLDER.” The ’825 Patent was duly and legally

    issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 16, 2008. The ’825 Patent is

    still in force and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’825 Patent is

    attached hereto as Exhibit A.

    12. 

    Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D582,709 (“the ’709

    Patent”), entitled “PAPER TOWEL HOLDER.” The ’709 Patent was duly and legally issued by the

    United States Patent and Trademark Office on December 16, 2008. The ’709 Patent is still in force

    and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’709 Patent is attached

    hereto as Exhibit B.

    13.  Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D634,122 (“the ’122

    Patent”), entitled “BASKET.” The ’122 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent

    and Trademark Office on March 15, 2011. The ’122 Patent is still in force and effect and is presumed

     valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’122 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.

    14.  Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D637,000 (“the ’000

    Patent”), entitled “BASKET.” The ’000 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent

    and Trademark Office on May 3, 2011. The ’000 Patent is still in force and effect and is presumed

     valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’000 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

    15. 

    Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D639,613 (“the ’613

    Patent”), entitled “ARTICLE HOLDER.” The ’613 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United

    States Patent and Trademark Office on June 14, 2011. The ’613 Patent is still in force and effect and is

    presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’613 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit E.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 15. PageID #: 3

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    4/57

    4

    16.  Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D645,671 (“the ’671

    Patent”), entitled “HOLDER FOR HOUSEHOLD ARTICLES.” The ’671 Patent was duly and

    legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 27, 2011. The ’671

    Patent is still in force and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’671

    Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit F.

    17. 

    Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D646,933 (“the ’933

    Patent”), entitled “FRUIT BOWL AND FRUIT TREE.” The ’933 Patent was duly and legally issued

    by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 18, 2011. The ’933 Patent is still in

    force and effect and is presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’933 Patent is

    attached hereto as Exhibit G.

    18.  Spectrum is the owner by way of assignment of U.S. Patent No. D648,131 (“the ’131

    Patent”), entitled “BASKET.” The ’131 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent

    and Trademark Office on November 8, 2011. The ’131 Patent is still in force and effect and is

    presumed valid under the U.S. patent laws. A copy of the ’131 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit H.

    COUNT I

    INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’825 PATENT

    19.  Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-18 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    20.  Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’825 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Standard paper roll product holder (Product No.

    2787371).

    21.   A comparison of the paper roll product holder of the ’825 patent to the infringing

    Standard paper roll product holder is shown below.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 15. PageID #: 4

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    5/57

    5

     The ’825 Patent – Paper Roll Product Holder Standard Paper Roll Product Holder

    22.  Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’825 Patent.

    23.  Harman’s infringement of the ’825 Patent has been willful.

    24.  Haman’s infringement of the ’825 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    25.   The infringement of the ’825 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    COUNT IIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’709 PATENT

    26.  Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-25 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    27.  Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’709 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Deco paper roll product holder (Product No.

    2757526).

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 15. PageID #: 5

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    6/57

    6

    28.   A comparison of the paper roll product holder of the ’709 patent to the infringing

    Deco paper roll product holder is shown below.

     The ’709 Patent – Paper Roll Product Holder Deco Paper Roll Product Holder

    29.  Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’709 Patent.

    30.  Harman’s infringement of the ’709 Patent has been willful.

    31.  Haman’s infringement of the ’709 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    32.   The infringement of the ’709 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    COUNT IIIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’122 PATENT

    33. 

    Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-32 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    34.  Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’122 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Basket (S) (Product No. 2783507).

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 6 of 15. PageID #: 6

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    7/57

    7

    35.   A comparison of the basket of the ’122 patent to the infringing basket is shown below.

     The ’122 Patent – Basket Basket (S)

    36. 

    Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’122 Patent.

    37. 

    Harman’s infringement of the ’122 Patent has been willful.

    38. 

    Haman’s infringement of the ’122 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    39. 

     The infringement of the ’122 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    COUNT IVINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’000 PATENT

    40.  Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-39 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    41. 

    Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’000 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Basket w/ Handles (Product No. 2783207).

    42.   A comparison of the basket of the ’000 patent to the infringing basket is shown below.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 7 of 15. PageID #: 7

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    8/57

    8

     The ’000 Patent – Basket Basket w/ Handles

    43. 

    Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’000 Patent.

    44. 

    Harman’s infringement of the ’000 Patent has been willful.

    45. 

    Haman’s infringement of the ’000 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    46. 

     The infringement of the ’000 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    COUNT VINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’613 PATENT

    47.  Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-46 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    48. 

    Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’613 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Wire Organizer (Product No. 278229).

    49.   A comparison of the article holder of the ’613 patent to the infringing Wire Organizer

    is shown below.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 8 of 15. PageID #: 8

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    9/57

    9

     The ’613 Patent – Article Holder Wire Organizer

    50.  Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’613 Patent.

    51. 

    Harman’s infringement of the ’613 Patent has been willful.

    52. 

    Haman’s infringement of the ’613 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    53. 

     The infringement of the ’613 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    COUNT VIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’671 PATENT

    54.  Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-53 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    55.  Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’671 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Napkin Holder (Product No. 2783007).

    56.   A comparison of the napkin holder of the ’671 patent to the infringing Napkin Holder

    is shown below.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 9 of 15. PageID #: 9

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    10/57

    10

     The ’671 Patent – Napkin Holder Napkin Holder

    57.  Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’671 Patent.

    58.  Harman’s infringement of the ’671 Patent has been willful.

    59.  Haman’s infringement of the ’671 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    60.   The infringement of the ’671 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    COUNT VIIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’933 PATENT

    61.  Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-60 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    62.  Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’933 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Round Basket (Product No. 2783307).

    63.   A comparison of the paper roll product holder of the ’933 patent to the infringing fruit

    bowl is shown below.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 10 of 15. PageID #: 10

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    11/57

    11

     The ’933 Patent – Fruit Bowl Round Basket

    64. 

    Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’933 Patent.

    65.  Harman’s infringement of the ’933 Patent has been willful.

    66.  Haman’s infringement of the ’933 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    67.   The infringement of the ’933 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    COUNT VIIIINFRINGEMENT OF THE ’131 PATENT

    68.  Spectrum incorporates the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-67 above as if each

     were separately set forth at length herein.

    69.  Harman has been and still is directly infringing the ’131 Patent under 35 U.S.C. §271(a)

    by making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Basket (L) (Product No. 2783707) and the Square

    Basket (Product No. 2783807).

    70.  Comparisons of the baskets of the ’131 patent to the infringing baskets are shown

    below.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 11 of 15. PageID #: 11

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    12/57

    12

     The ’131 Patent – Basket Basket (L)

     The ’131 Patent – Basket Square Basket

    71. 

    Upon information and belief, Harman is aware of the ’131 Patent.

    72. 

    Harman’s infringement of the ’131 Patent has been willful.

    73. 

    Haman’s infringement of the ’131 Patent has caused, and continues to cause, Spectrum

    to suffer injury and economic damages.

    74. 

     The infringement of the ’131 Patent by Harman is causing irreparable harm to

    Spectrum and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Spectrum unless Harman’s infringing

    activities are enjoined by this Court.

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 12 of 15. PageID #: 12

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    13/57

    13

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF 

     WHEREFORE, Spectrum respectfully requests that this Court:

     A.  Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’825 Patent;

    B. 

    Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’709 Patent;

    C. 

    Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’122 Patent;

    D. 

    Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’000 Patent;

    E. 

    Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’613 Patent;

    F. 

    Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’671 Patent;

    G.  Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’933 Patent;

    H.  Enter judgment that Defendant has infringed the ’131 Patent;

    I.  Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’825 Patent for the full term thereof;

     J.  Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’709 Patent for the full term thereof;

    K.  Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’122 Patent for the full term thereof;

    L.  Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’000 Patent for the full term thereof;

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 13 of 15. PageID #: 13

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    14/57

    14

    M.  Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’613 Patent for the full term thereof;

    N. 

    Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’671 Patent for the full term thereof;

    O. 

    Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’933 Patent for the full term thereof;

    P.  Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction to enjoin Defendant and its officers,

    agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with it, from infringing the

    ’131 Patent for the full term thereof;

    Q.   Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’825 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

    R. 

     Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’709 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

    S.   Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’122 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

     T.   Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’000 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

    U. 

     Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’613 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

     V.   Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’671 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 14 of 15. PageID #: 14

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    15/57

    15

     W.   Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’933 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

    X.   Award Spectrum damages adequate to compensate Spectrum for the infringement of

    the ’131 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 289;

     Y. 

    Declare that this is an exceptional case and award of attorneys’ fees, expenses,

    disbursements, and costs of this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;

    Z. 

    Order Defendant to pay costs, pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest to

    Spectrum;

     AA.  Order an accounting for any infringing sales not presented at trial and award additional

    damages for any such infringing sales; and

    BB.  Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.

     JURY DEMAND

    Plaintiff requests a trial by jury of any issue triable as of right pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the

    Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

    Dated: June 12, 2015 /s/ Mark C. JohnsonMark C. Johnson (0072625)[email protected] B. Fleming (0064644)[email protected], Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Avenue, 19th FloorCleveland, Ohio 44115

    216-621-1113 (telephone)216-621-6165 (facsimile)

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/12/15 15 of 15. PageID #: 15

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    16/57

    ( 1 2 ) United

    States

    Design Patent ( 1 0 )

    P a t e n t N o . :

    Goodman

    t

    a ] .

    USO0D576825S

    US D 5 7 6 , 8 2 5 S

    ( 4 5 )

    Date

    o f P a t e n t : * 1 , S e p .

    1 6 , 2008

    ( 5 4 )

    ( 7 5 )

    ( 7 3 )

    ( * * )

    ( 2 1 )

    ( 2 2 )

    ( 5 1 )

    ( 5 2 )

    ( 5 8 )

    ( 5 6 )

    PAPER

    ROLL PRODUCT

    HOLDER

    I n v e n t o r s : S h e l d o n

    H .

    Goodman, S o l o n , OH

    U S ) ;

    Omer

    .

    S a z i r ,

    C l e v e l a n d ,

    OH

    U S )

    A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m

    D i v e r s i ? e d D e s i g n s , I n c . ,

    S t r e e t s b o r o ,

    OH

    U S )

    Term:

    14

    Years

    A p p l .

    N o . : 2 9 / 2 9 7 , 4 8 4

    F i l e d : N o v . 1 3 , 2007

    LOC 8) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20-02

    US.

    l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    .. D6/521

    Field of

    Classi?cation Search . . . . . . . .

    . .

    D6/546i550,

    D 6 / 5 l 8 i 5 l 9 , 5 2 2* 5 2 4 ;

    D 8 / 3 0 0 ,

    3 0 3 , 3 1 5 * 3 2 1 ;

    l 0 8 / 2 8 i 2 9 ; 2 1 1 / 1 3 . 1 , 1 6 ,

    6 0 . 1 , 8 6 . 0 1 , 8 7 . 0 1 ,

    2 1 1 / 8 8 . 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 4 , 1 0 0 , 1 0 5 . 1 * 1 0 5 . 2 , 1 2 3 ,

    2 1 1 / 1 8 1 . 1 ,

    1 8 2 ; 2 4 8 / 1 7 5 , 1 7 6 . 1 ,

    2 5 1 , 3 0 2 ;

    1 6 / 1 1 0 . 1 , 4 1 2 ,

    4 1 5 ; 2 4 2 / 5 7 0 , 5 9 0 ,

    595598

    S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e

    s e a r c h h i s t o r y .

    References Cited

    U . S .

    PATENT

    DOCUMENTS

    D390,054 S * 2/1998 Goodman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D6/522

    D474,634

    S * 5/2003

    Ancona

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . D6/522

    D512,590 S *

    12/2005 Goodman t a l . . . . .

    . . D6/521

    D517,846

    S * 3/2006

    G o odm an

    t

    a l . D6/521

    D522,292

    S * 6/2006

    G o odm an t a l . D6/521

    D555,954 S *

    11/2007

    Yang t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/521

    * c i t e d by examiner

    P r i m a r y ExamineriBrian

    N i n s o n

    ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,

    A g e n t ,

    o r FirmiPearne

    ordon

    LLP

    ( 5 7 )

    CLAIM

    The o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r

    a

    p a p e r

    r o l l

    p r o d u c t h o l d e r , a s

    shoWn and d e s c r i b e d .

    DESCRIPTION

    F I G . 1

    i s a p e r s p e c t i v e vieW

    o f

    a p a p e r r o l l

    p r o d u c t

    h o l d e r ,

    showing o u r neW

    d e s i g n ;

    F I G . 2 i s a f r o n t

    e l e v a t i o n a l vieW

    h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 3 i s a s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l vieW t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 4 i s a t o p p l a n

    v i e W

    t h e r e o f ;

    FIG. 5 i s a p e r s p e c t i v e vieW

    of

    a

    second

    embodiment

    of

    a

    p a p e r r o l l

    p r o d u c t

    h o l d e r , W h e r e i n t h e b r o k e n l i n e s form n o

    p a r t o f t h e c l a i m e d d e s i g n a n d t h e

    p o r t i o n s

    o f t h e p e r i p h e r a l

    member

    h a t

    a r e

    shoWn

    broken

    aWay

    n d i c a t e

    t h a t

    t h e l e n g t h s

    o f e a c h o f h e

    b r o k e n

    p e r i p h e r a l member o r t i o n s d o n o t

    f o r m

    a p a r t

    o f

    t h e d e s i g n ; a n d ,

    FIG.

    6

    i s

    a

    p e r s p e c t i v e vieW

    of

    t h i r d embodiment

    of paper

    r o l l p r o d u c t h o l d e r , W h e r e i n t h e b r o k e n l i n e s i n t h e c e n t r a l

    v e r t i c a l e l e m e n t s i n d i c a t e

    t h e

    s p e c i ? c h e i g h t o f

    t h e

    e l e m e n t s

    and

    t h e

    p a p e r p r o d u ct r o l l

    h o l d e r d o n o t form a p a r t o f t h e

    d e s i g n , a n d t h e p o r t i o n s

    o f

    t h e p e r i p h e r a l

    b a s e member h a t

    a r e

    b r o k e n

    aWay n d i c a t e t h a t

    t h e

    l e n g t h

    o f e a c h o f t h e b r o k e n

    p e r i p h e r a l b a s e

    member

    o r t i o n s d o e s n o t f o r m a p a r t

    o f

    t h e

    d e s i g n .

    The d o t t e d l i n e d i s c l o s u r e o f

    e l e m e n t s

    i n t h e v i e W s

    i s

    f o r

    i l l u s t r a t i v e

    p u r p o s e s

    o n l y and f o r m s no

    p a r t

    o f

    t h e

    c l a i m e d

    d e s i g n .

    1 C l a i m ,

    3

    Drawing S h e e t s

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 4. PageID #: 16

    A

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    17/57

    US. Patent S e p . 1 6 ,

    2 0 0 8

    S h e e t

    1

    o f 3

    US D576,825

    S

    ( ( ( ( (

    FIG.2

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 4. PageID #: 17

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    18/57

    US. Patent S e p . 1 6 ,

    2 0 0 8

    S h e e t 2 o f 3

    US D576,825

    S

    3 3 )

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 4. PageID #: 18

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    19/57

    US.

    Patent

    S e p . 1 6 ,

    2 0 0 8

    S h e e t

    3 o f 3

    US D576,825

    S

    F|13.6

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 4. PageID #: 19

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    20/57

    USO0D582709S

    ( 1 2 ) United States Design

    Patent

    ( 1 0 ) P a t e n t N 0 . : US D 5 8 2 , 7 0 9

    S

    Goodman t

    a ] . ( 4 5 )

    Date

    o f

    P a t e n t : i i i ,

    D e c . 1 6 ,

    2008

    (54)

    PAPER

    TOWEL

    HOLDER D5l7,846 S *

    3/2006 Goodman

    t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/52l

    D522,292

    S * 6/2006 G o odm an t a l . D6/52l

    Inventors:

    S heldon HI Goodman’ Solon’ D545,599 S * 7/2007 Yu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . 1 3 6 / 5 2 1

    Omer

    L

    sazir

    Cleveland

    OH

    Us)

    D555,954

    S

    *

    1 1 / 2 0 0 7

    Yang

    t

    a l .

    . D6/521

    ’ ’ D562,042 s

    *

    2/2008 Shek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D6/521

    ( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m

    D i v e r s i ? e d

    D e s i g n s , I n c . , *

    c i t e d b y

    e x a m i n e r

    S t r e e t s b o r o , OH S

    ( U ) P r i m a r y E x a m i n e r i B r i a n N i n s o n

    ( * * )

    T e r m ;

    1 4 Years ( 7 4 )

    A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , o r

    FirmiPearne ordon

    LLP

    ( 2 1 )

    A p p l .

    N o . :

    2 9 / 3 1 9 , 6 4 8

    ( 5 7 )

    CLAIM

    ( 2 2 ) F i l e d ; J

    1 1 1 , 1 2 ,

    2008 The

    r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a p a p e r t o w e l

    h o l d e r ,

    a s

    shoWn

    and

    d e s c r i b e d .

    (51) LOC 8 ) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    20-02

    (52) us. l.

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/521

    _ ' DESCRIPTION '

    ( 5 8 ) Field

    of Class i?cation Search

    . . . . . . . .

    . .

    D6/5l8i523;

    FIG- 1 1 S

    a

    Perspecnve VIeW Of Paper towel h o l d e r ,

    showlng

    2 0 6 / 3 8 9 , 3 9 1 ; 2 1 1 / 1 3 1 , 5 9 . 1 , 4 5 , 8 9 0 . 1 ; O u r

    new

    d e s i g n ;

    2 4 2 / 5 7 0 ,

    5 9 0 ;

    2 4 8 / 3 0 9 1 , 3 0 9 - 2

    F I G .

    2 i s a

    f r o n t

    e l e v a t i o n a l V i e w t h e r e o f ;

    S e e

    a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r

    c o m p l e t e

    s e a r c h h i s t o r y . F I G ‘

    3

    i s

    a r e a r

    e l e v a t i o n a l View t h e r e o f ;

    ( 5 6 ) R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d

    F I G .

    4 i s

    a

    s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l

    View

    t h e r e o f ;

    U _ S _ PATENT DOCUMENTS F I G . 5 i s a t o p p l a n

    V i e w

    t h e r e o f ; a n d ,

    D405,304 s

    *

    2/1999 Goodman

    t

    a l . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/522

    FIG'

    6

    i s

    a bottom Plan View t h e r e o f ‘

    D474,635

    S * 5/2003 Ancona . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    D479,072 S

    *

    9/2003 Duncan t

    a l .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    .

    D6/522 1 Clai m, 3 Drawing Sheets

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 4. PageID #: 20

    B

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    21/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 4. PageID #: 21

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    22/57

    US. Patent

    D e c . 1 6 , 2 0 0 8

    S h e e t

    2

    o f 3

    US D582,709 S

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 4. PageID #: 22

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    23/57

    US. Patent

    D e c . 1 6 , 2 0 0 8 S h e e t 3

    o f 3

    US D582,709 S

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-2 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 4. PageID #: 23

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    24/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 8. PageID #: 24

    C

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    25/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 8. PageID #: 25

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    26/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 8. PageID #: 26

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    27/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 8. PageID #: 27

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    28/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 8. PageID #: 28

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    29/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 6 of 8. PageID #: 29

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    30/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 7 of 8. PageID #: 30

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    31/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-3 Filed: 06/12/15 8 of 8. PageID #: 31

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    32/57

    ( 1 2 ) United

    States

    Design Patent ( 1 0 )

    P a t e n t N o . :

    Goodman t a l .

    USO0D637000S

    US D 6 3 7 , 0 0 0 S

    ( 5 4 )

    ( 7 5 )

    ( 7 3 )

    ( * * )

    ( 2 1 )

    ( 2 2 )

    ( 6 2 )

    ( 5 1 )

    ( 5 2 )

    ( 5 8 )

    ( 5 6 )

    BASKET

    I n v e n t o r s :

    S h e l d o n

    H .

    Goodman,

    S o l o n , OH U S ) ;

    Omer

    .

    S a z i r ,

    C l e v e l a n d ,

    OH

    U S ) ;

    E l i z a b e t h A . C h o , S t r o n g s v i l l e ,

    OH

    ( U s )

    A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m

    D i v e r s i ? e d D e s i g n s , I n c . ,

    S t r e e t s b o r o ,

    OH U S )

    Term: 14 Years

    A p p 1 . N o . : 2 9 / 3 8 0 , 7 3 9

    F i l e d : D e c . 1 0 , 2010

    R e l a t e d US.

    p p l i c a t i o n

    Data

    D i v i s i o n o f a p p l i c a t i o n N o . 2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 9 , ? l e d

    on

    u g .

    1 4 ,

    2 0 1 0 .

    LOC 9) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03-01

    US. l. .................................... . . .

    Field of Class i?cation Search

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . D3/304,

    D 3 / 3 0 6 i 3 0 9 ,

    3 1 4 ,

    3 1 5 ; D 7 / 6 0 l i 6 0 2 ; 2 2 0 / 4 8 5 ,

    2 2 0 / 5 8 6 ; D 6 / 5 6 6 i 5 6 7 , 5 3 7 , 5 4 0 , 5 7 4 , 5 7 2 ,

    D 6 / 5 1 0 ;

    2 1 1 / 1 3 . 1 , 4 1 . 3 , 4 1 . 4 ,

    8 6 . 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 1 ,

    2 1 1 / 1 3 4 , 1 2 6 . 1

    S e e

    a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e

    f o r c o m p l e t e

    s e a r c h

    h i s t o r y .

    References

    Cited

    U . S .

    PATENTDOCUMENTS

    D193,215 S * 7/1962 Frederick

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    .. D3/306

    4,337,872

    A 7/1982

    Wright

    . .

    D296,601

    S

    *

    7/1988

    D382,710

    S 8 / 1 9 9 7

    D399,381 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 8

    D412,080

    S 7 / 1 9 9 9

    Chap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    .. D3/ 6

    Henderson

    H o e r n i g

    E m e r y

    ( 4 5 ) Date o f

    P a t e n t :

    * 9 : May

    ,

    2011

    D419,771 S 2 / 2 0 0 0 Chen

    D420,513 S 2 / 2 0 0 0

    Chen

    D434,718 S 1 2 / 2 0 0 0 K r e i s l e r

    D443,159 S 6 / 2 0 0 1

    F e r r e r B e l t r a n

    D444,012 S 6 / 2 0 0 1

    F e r r e r

    B e l t r a n

    D472,750 S

    4 / 2 0 0 3 C l u c a s

    D477,144 S

    7 / 2 0 0 3

    Remmers

    D 5 0 7 , 1 0 8

    S 7 / 2 0 0 5 S u e r o , J r .

    D526,454 S *

    8/2006

    Plikuhn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D32/55

    D578,762 S *

    10/2008

    S m i t h

    e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    D3/306

    D608,598

    S

    1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D608,599 S

    1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D616,252 S 5 / 2 0 1 0

    Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D616,254 S 5 / 2 0 1 0

    Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D616,255 S 5 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D622,107

    S

    8 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D629,610 S *

    12/2010 Goodman t

    a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D3/306

    D629,656 S * 12/2010

    Goodman

    t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D7/601

    *

    c i t e d by

    examiner

    Primary E xaminer lizabeth

    A

    lbert

    A s s i s t a n t

    Examiner

    *

    elley

    A

    onnelly

    ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , or Firm

    * earne

    ordon

    LLP

    ( 5 7 ) CLAIM

    The

    r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r

    a

    b a s k e t ,

    a s shown

    and

    d e s c r i b e d .

    DESCRIPTION

    FIG.

    1

    i s

    a

    p e r s p e c t i v e view of

    a

    b a s k e t showing our

    new

    d e s i g n ;

    F I G .

    2 i s a t o p p l a n v i e w t h e r e o f ;

    F I G .

    3 i s a

    f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view

    h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 4 i s

    a

    r i g h t

    s i d e

    e l e v a t i o n a l view

    t h e r e o f , t h e

    l e f t s i d e

    e l e v a t i o n a l v i e w

    b e i n g i d e n t i c a l ; a n d ,

    F I G .

    5 i s a

    bottom

    p l a n

    view

    t h e r e o f .

    The d o t t e d - l i n e s h o w i n g i n t h e

    d r a w i n g s

    i l l u s t r a t e s

    e n v i r o n

    m e n t a l m a t t e r

    and f o r m s

    no

    p a r t

    o f

    t h e

    c l a i m e d

    d e s i g n .

    1

    C l a i m ,

    2

    Drawing S h e e t s

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 3. PageID #: 32

    D

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    33/57

    US. Patent May , 2 0 1 1

    S h e e t 1

    0 1 2

    US D637,000

    S

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 3. PageID #: 33

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    34/57

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-4 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 3. PageID #: 34

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    35/57

    USO0D639613S

    ( 1 2 )

    United States Design

    Patent ( 1 0 )

    P a t e n t N o . : US D 6 3 9 , 6 1 3 S

    Goodman

    t a l . ( 4 5 )

    Date

    o f

    P a t e n t : 4 *

    J u n . 1 4 , 2011

    ( 5 4 )

    AR T I CL E

    HOLDER ( 5 6 )

    R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d

    ( 7 5 ) I n v e n t o r s : S h e l d o n H .

    Goodman,

    S o l o n , OH U S ) ;

    US‘

    PATENT

    DOCUMENTS

    - _ D387,949 S

    *

    12/1997

    Bentson

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D7/409

    01 “ ‘ s a w’ l e v e l a n d ’ O _ H ms)’ D 4 2 l , 0 6 2 s

    *

    2 / 2 0 0 0 G o o d m a n e t a 1 . 1 3 1 9 / 9 0

    Elizabeth A. Cho, S t r o n g s v 1 l l e ,

    OH D 4 2 1 , 2 7 3

    S

    *

    2 / 2 0 0 0

    Goodman

    t

    a 1 . Dl9/90

    (Us) D555,203

    S

    *

    1 1 / 2 0 0 7

    Goodmanetal.

    D19/90

    D568,056 S * 5/2008 Yarborough

    . . . . . . . . . . .

    D6/317

    _

    D582,697 S

    *

    12/2008 Goodman et a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/462

    ( 7 3 ) A s s 1 g n e e : S p e c t r u m

    D i v e r s i ? e d

    D e s i g n s ,

    I n c . ,

    * C i t e d b y

    e x a m i n e r

    S t r e e t s b o r o , OH

    U )

    Primary

    Examiner an

    Simmons

    ( * * ) Term;

    14

    Years A s s i s t a n t Examiner* ana L i p o s

    ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t ,

    or

    Firm

    *

    earne

    ordon

    LLP

    ( 2 1 )

    A p p l .

    N o . :

    2 9 / 3 6 3 , 9 4 6

    ( 5 7 )

    CLAIM

    We

    c l a i m t h e o r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r

    an

    a r t i c l e h o l d e r , a s

    ( 2 2 ) F i l e d : J u n .

    1 6 ,

    2 0 1 0 shoWn a n d d e s c r i b e d .

    (51) LOC 9 )

    Cl.

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . 07-06

    DESCRIPTION

    ( 5 2 )

    US.

    l .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . .

    D7/632; D6/458;

    D19/90

    F I G .

    1

    i s

    a

    t o p , f r o n t ,

    r i g h t

    s i d e p e r s p e c t i v e vieW o f a n

    a r t i c l e

    0f Classi?cation

    Search . . . . . . . . .

    . . holder Showing our

    new

    design;

    D 7 / 6 3 l i 6 3 2 ,

    6 3 7 ,

    7 0 4 ; D 6 / 4 5 8 , 4 6 2 , 5 6 6 ; F I G . 2 i s a

    t o p

    p l a n v i e W t h e r e o f ;

    2 2 0 / 4 8 5 ,

    5 9 1 ;

    2 1 1 / 1 8 1 . 1 , 8 5 . 3 1 , 1 3 . 1 , 1 1 ,

    F I G - 3 1 S a b o t t o m

    p l a n

    v l e w t h e r e o f ;

    2 1 1 / 4 1 . 1 4 4 1 . 4 , 1 2 6 . 9 , 1 3 3 . 5 ; D 3 / 3 0 6 ;

    D 1 9 / 6 5 ,

    F I G ' 4 1 5 a

    1 1 0 m

    e l e v a i l o n Y l e W ‘ h e r e o f ’ a n d ’

    FIG.

    5 s a s 1 d e elevat1on

    v 1 e W t h e r e o f .

    1 3 1 9 / 7 5 , 8 6 ,

    9 0

    S e e

    a p p l i c a t i o n

    ? l e f o r c o m p l e t e s e a r c h h i s t o r y . 1

    C l a i m ,

    2

    Drawing S h e e t s

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 3. PageID #: 35

    E

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    36/57

    US.

    Patent

    J u n . 1 4

    2 0 1 1

    S h e e t

    1 o f 2

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 3. PageID #: 36

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    37/57

    US. Patent

    J u n . 1 4 , 2 0 1 1

    S h e e t

    2

    o f 2

    US D639,613 S

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-5 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 3. PageID #: 37

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    38/57

    USO0D645671S

    ( 1 2 )

    United States Design

    Patent ( 1 0 )

    P a t e n t N o . : US D 6 4 5 , 6 7 1

    S

    G o od m an e t

    a l .

    ( 4 5 ) Date o f P a t e n t : * 9 :

    S e p .

    2 7 ,

    2011

    (54) HOLDER

    FOR HOUSEHOLDARTICLES D634,121 S

    * 3/2011 Goodman t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D3/306

    2 0 0 9 / 0 0 6 5 4 5 2

    A1*

    3 / 2 0 0 9 S m i t h 2 1 1 / 1 1

    ( 7 5 )

    I n v e n t o r s : Sheldon H. Goodman, o l o n , OH

    U S ) ; 20 0 9 / 0 0 6 5 4 5 3

    A 1* 3 / 2 0 0 9 S m l t h

    " " " " " " " " " " " " " "

    2 1 1 / 1 1

    Omer

    .

    S a z i r ,

    C l e v e l a n d ,

    OH

    U S ) ;

    *

    C i t e d

    by e X a m i n e r

    E l i z a b e t h

    A .

    C h o ,

    S t r o n g s v i l l e , OH

    (Us) Primary Examiner* ary Ann a l a b r e s e

    ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y ,

    A g e n t , or

    Firm

    *

    earne

    ordon LLP

    ( 7 3 ) A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m D i v e r s i ? e d D e s i g n s , I n c . ,

    S t r e e t s b o r o , OH U S ) ( 5 7 ) CLAIM

    The

    r n a m e n t a l

    d e s i g n

    f o r

    a h o l d e r

    f o r household

    r t i c l e s ,

    a s

    ( * * ) T e r m ; 1 4 Years

    shown

    a n d d e s c r i b e d .

    ( 2 1 )

    A p p l .

    N o . :

    2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 6 DESCRIPTION

    ( 2 2 )

    F l l e d : Aug‘ 1 4 ’ 2010 F I G . 1

    i s

    a p e r s p e c t i v e v i e w o f a

    h o l d e r

    f o r h o u s e h o l d a r t i c l e s

    ( 5 1 ) LOC 9 ) C l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06-04 Showing our

    new

    e s i g n ;

    ( 5 2 ) US. l . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3 6 / 3 6 2

    FIG_

    2 i s a t o p plan View h e r e o f ;

    ( 5 8 )

    Field of

    Classi?cation

    Search

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . .

    1 3 6 / 3 9 6 ,

    FIG,

    3 i s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l

    view

    h e r e o f ;

    D 6 / 4 4 9 ,

    4 5 0 ,

    4 5 4 * 4 6 9 ,

    5 6 6 ; 2 1 1 / 1 ,

    1 1 ,

    1 3 1 , F I G .

    4

    i s

    a

    r i g h t

    s i d e

    e l e v a t i o n a l

    v i e w

    t h e r e o f ,

    t h e

    l e f t

    s i d e

    2 1 1 / 2 2 ,

    4 1 . 1 , 4 1 . 2 , 8 5 . 3 1 , 8 6 . 0 1 , 1 3 4 , 1 9 1 . 1 ;

    e l e v a t i o n a l V i e w b e i n g i d e n t i c a l ;

    1 3 7 / 6 0 1 ,

    6 3 1 ; 1 3 1 9 / 9 0 ,

    9 2 ;

    1 3 3 / 3 0 4 , 3 0 6

    F I G , 5 i s a

    b o t t o m

    p l a n

    v i e w

    t h e r e o f ;

    S e e a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r C o m p l e t e S e a r c h h i s t o r y . F I G . 6

    i s

    a p e r s p e c t i v e v i e w o f a s e c o n d embodiment o f t h e

    d e s i g n shown n F I G . 1 ;

    ( 5 6 )

    R e f e r e n c e s C i t e d

    F I G .

    7 i s a t o p p l a n

    v i e w t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 8

    i s

    a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ;

    U ~ S ~

    PATENTDOCUMENTS F I G .

    9

    i s

    a r i g h t

    s i d e

    e l e v a t i o n a l view t h e r e o f , t h e

    l e f t

    s i d e

    D436,463 S * 1 / 2 0 0 1 Goodman t

    a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . D6/462 e l e v a t i o n a l view being

    i d e n t i c a l ;

    and,

    D453,273

    S * 2/2002 Goodman t

    a l .4 8 4 , 0 0 8

    S * 12/2003 Goodman t

    a l .

    ,948,621 B1 9/2005 Lassanske e t

    a l . . .

    . .

    13575554

    S

    > 1

    8/2008 C a l a b r i a e t

    a 1 ‘

    “ “ 1 3 6 / 4 6 2

    mental matter and

    forms no p a r t of the

    clalmed

    des1gn.

    D583,589

    S

    *

    12/2008

    G o odm an t a l .

    D6/462

    D583,872 S

    *

    12/2008

    Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . Dl9/90 1 Clai m, 4 Drawing Sheets

    ~ ~

    1 3 6 / 4 6 2

    FIG.

    10

    s

    a

    bottom plan view

    h e r e o f .

    The r o k e n l i n e s s h o w i n g

    i n

    t h e

    d r a w i n g s

    i l l u s t r a t e s

    e n v i r o n

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 5. PageID #: 38

    F

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    39/57

    US

    D 6 4 5 , 6 7 1

    S

    e p .

    S . P a t e n t

    FIG. 1

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 5. PageID #: 39

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    40/57

    US. Patent S e p . 2 7 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 2

    o f 4 US

    D645,671 S

    ( I . 5 1

    i f ’

    f’

    y

    I

    I n I J

    L i L

    FIG. 2

    S E i n

    : L

    ‘ f k x

    ( 1 1 2 1 1 1 : i i i i i i i i i i i i i i f i 7 ‘

    FIG 3 FIG 4

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 5. PageID #: 40

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    41/57

    US

    D 6 4 5 , 6 7 1

    S

    S . P a t e n t

    FIG. 6

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 5. PageID #: 41

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    42/57

    US. Patent S e p . 2 7 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t

    4 o f 4 US

    D645,671 S

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-6 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 5. PageID #: 42

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    43/57

    ( 1 2 ) United

    States

    Design Patent ( 1 0 )

    P a t e n t N o . :

    Goodman t a l .

    USO0D646933S

    US

    D 6 4 6 , 9 3 3

    S

    ( 4 5 )

    Date o f

    P a t e n t : * 1 .

    O c t .

    1 8 , 2011

    ( 5 4 )

    ( 7 5 )

    ( 7 3 )

    ( * * )

    ( 2 1 )

    ( 2 2 )

    ( 5 1 )

    ( 5 2 )

    ( 5 8 )

    ( 5 6 )

    FRUIT

    BOWL

    ND FRUIT

    TREE

    I n v e n t o r s :

    S h e l d o n

    H .

    Goodman,

    S o l o n , OH U S ) ;

    Omer

    .

    S a z i r ,

    C l e v e l a n d ,

    OH

    U S ) ;

    E l i z a b e t h A . C h o , S t r o n g s v i l l e ,

    OH

    ( U s )

    A s s i g n e e : S p e c t r u m

    D i v e r s i ? e d

    D e s i g n s , I n c . ,

    S t r e e t s b o r o ,

    OH

    U S )

    Term: 14 Years

    A p p 1 . N o . : 2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 5

    F i l e d :

    A u g . 1 4 , 2 0 1 0

    LOC 9) Cl. . . . . . .

    US.

    l.

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    ..

    Field

    of Classi?cation

    Search

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . .

    D7/ 01,

    D 7 / 6 0 2 ,

    6 2 9 , 7 0 4 , 4 0 9 ,

    5 8 4 5 8 7 ,

    5 0 0 ;

    D 6 / 5 2 5 ,

    D 6 / 5 6 6 ,

    5 6 7 , 5 1 1 , 5 7 2 , 5 7 4 ,

    5 3 7 , 5 4 0 ;

    D 1 9 / 7 6 ;

    D 3 / 3 0 4 ,

    3 0 6 ;

    2 1 1 / 1 8 1 1 , 1 3 . 1 , 4 1 . 3 , 4 1 . 4 ,

    2 1 1 / 8 6 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 1 ; 2 2 0 / 5 7 4 i 5 7 5

    S e e

    a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e f o r

    c o m p l e t e

    s e a r c h

    h i s t o r y .

    References Cited

    U . S . PATENTDOCUMENTS

    D274,880

    S

    *

    7/1984

    Bentson339,266

    S

    * 9/1993

    Lockett

    .

    D371,228 S * 6/1996

    Monin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    ..

    D7/409

    .. D7/409

    D7/601

    D446,688 S

    *

    8/2001 Vanello

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . .

    D7/601

    D462,422

    S * 9/2002

    Conner D3/306

    D479,098 S

    *

    9/2003 Ancona . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    D7/601

    D519,325

    S * 4/2006 G o odm an

    t a 1 . D7/601

    D567,030

    S

    *

    4/2008

    G o odm an t a 1 . D7/601

    D569,691 S * 5/2008 G o odm an t a 1 . D7/601

    D578,762 S * 10/2008 Smith e t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . .

    . .

    D6/566

    D589,304 S * 3/2009

    Goodman

    t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D7/601

    * c i t e d by examiner

    Primary Examiner erry Wallace

    ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t , or Firm *

    earne

    ordon LLP

    ( 5 7 ) CLAIM

    The

    r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r a f r u i t bowl and r u i t t r e e , a s

    shown

    and d e s c r i b e d .

    DESCRIPTION

    FIG. 1 i s

    a

    p e r s p e c t i v e view of

    f r u i t bowl

    showing

    our new

    d e s i g n ;

    F I G .

    2

    i s

    a

    t o p p l a n

    v i e w

    t h e r e o f ;

    F I G .

    3

    i s

    a

    f r a g m e n t a r y v i e w ,

    on

    an

    e n l a r g e d

    s c a l e ,

    o f an

    a l t e r n a t i v e mesh m a t e r i a l used t o

    form

    t h e bottom

    w a l l

    d e n o t e d b y t h e number i n F I G . 2 ;

    F I G . 4 i s a f r o n t

    e l e v a t i o n a l view

    h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 5 i s

    a s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l view t h e r e o f ; a n d ,

    F I G . 6 i s a bottom p l a n

    view

    t h e r e o f .

    The d o t t e d - l i n e s h o w i n g i n t h e

    d r a w i n g s

    i l l u s t r a t e s

    e n v i r o n

    m e n t a l

    m a t t e r a n d f o r m s no

    p a r t

    o f t h e c l a i m e d d e s i g n .

    1

    C l a i m ,

    2

    Drawing S h e e t s

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 3. PageID #: 43

    G

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    44/57

    US. Patent

    0a. 8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 1

    0 1 2

    US D646,933 S

    FIG.1

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 3. PageID #: 44

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    45/57

    S h e e t 2

    0 f

    2

    US

    D646,933

    S

    S. Patent 0 a .

    1 8 ,

    2 0 1 1

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-7 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 3. PageID #: 45

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    46/57

    ( 1 2 ) United

    States

    Design Patent ( 1 0 )

    P a t e n t N o . :

    Goodman t a l .

    USO0D648131S

    US D 6 4 8 , 1 3 1 S

    ( 4 5 )

    Date

    o f P a t e n t : * 1 , *Nov.

    8 ,

    2011

    ( 5 4 )

    ( 7 5 )

    ( 7 3 )

    ( * )

    ( * * )

    ( 2 1 )

    ( 2 2 )

    ( 6 3 )

    ( 5 1 )

    ( 5 2 )

    ( 5 8 )

    ( 5 6 )

    BASKET

    I n v e n t o r s : S h e l d o n

    H .

    Goodman, S o l o n , OH

    U S ) ;

    Omer

    .

    S a z i r ,

    B r o o k l y n ,

    NY

    U S ) ;

    E l i z a b e t h

    A .

    C h o ,

    S t r o n g s v i l l e , OH

    ( U s )

    A s s i g n e e :

    S p e c t r u m

    D i v e r s i ? e d

    D e s i g n s , I n c . ,

    S t r e e t s b o r o ,

    OH

    U S )

    N o t i c e :

    T h i s

    p a t e n t

    i s

    s u b j e c t t o a

    t e r m i n a l

    d i s

    c l a i m e r .

    Term: 14 Years

    A p p 1 . N o . : 2 9 / 3 8 6 , 6 1 3

    F i l e d : Mar. , 2 0 1 1

    R e l a t e d

    US.

    p p l i c a t i o n

    Data

    C o n t i n u a t i o n - i n - p a r t

    o f

    a p p l i c a t i o n N o .

    2 9 / 3 6 7 , 8 9 9 ,

    ? l e d on Aug. 1 4 , 2 0 1 0 , now a t .

    No.

    D e s . 6 3 4 , 1 2 2 .

    LOC 9) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03-01

    US.

    l. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    ..

    D3/306

    Field of Class i?cation Search

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    . . D3/304,

    D 3 / 3 0 6 i 3 0 9 ,

    3 1 4 , 3 1 5 ;

    D 7 / 6 0 l i 6 0 2 ;

    2 2 0 / 4 8 5 ,

    2 2 0 / 5 8 6 ; D 6 / 5 6 6 i 5 6 7 , 5 3 7 , 5 4 0 , 5 7 4 , 5 7 2 ,

    D 6 / 5 1 0 ;

    2 1 1 / 1 3 . 1 , 4 1 . 3 , 4 1 . 4 , 8 6 . 0 1 , 8 8 . 0 1 ,

    2 1 1 / 1 3 4 , 1 2 6 . 1

    S e e

    a p p l i c a t i o n ? l e

    f o r c o m p l e t e

    s e a r c h h i s t o r y .

    References Cited

    U . S .

    PATENTDOCUMENTS

    D193,215 S 7 / 1 9 6 2 F r e d r i c k

    4 , 3 3 7 , 8 7 2

    A 7 / 1 9 8 2 W r i g h t

    D 2 9 6 , 6 0 1 S 7 / 1 9 8 8 Chap

    D382,710 S 8 / 1 9 9 7

    Henderson

    D 3 9 9 , 3 8 1 S 1 0 / 1 9 9 8 H o e r n i g

    D 4 1 2 , 0 8 0

    S 7 / 1 9 9 9

    Emery

    D419,771

    S 2 / 2 0 0 0

    Chen

    D420,513 S 2 / 2 0 0 0

    Chen

    D434,718

    S 1 2 / 2 0 0 0 K r e i s l e r

    D443,159 S 6 / 2 0 0 1

    F e r r e r B e l t r a n

    D444,012 S

    6 / 2 0 0 1

    F e r r e r

    B e l t r a n

    D472,750 S 4 / 2 0 0 3 C l u c a s

    D477,144 S 7 / 2 0 0 3

    Remmers

    D 5 0 7 , 1 0 8 S 7 / 2 0 0 5 S u e r o , J r .

    D526,454 S 8 / 2 0 0 6

    P l i k u h n

    D536,873

    S

    *

    2/2007 Thorsteinsson e t a 1 . . . . . . . .

    D3/306

    D554,417 S * 11/2007

    Thorsteinsson e t

    a 1 .

    . . . . .

    . . D6/566

    D5 5 4 , 4 1 9 S *

    11/2007

    Thompson t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . D6/566

    D578,762 S

    1 0 / 2 0 0 8 Smith

    t

    a 1 .

    D608,598 S

    1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D608,599 S 1 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman t

    a 1 .

    D616,252 S 5 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D616,254

    S

    5 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    D616,255 S 5 / 2 0 1 0

    Goodman

    t

    a 1 .

    ( C o n t i n u e d )

    Primary Ex aminer

    liZabeth Albert

    A s s i s t a n t Examiner elley

    Donnelly

    ( 7 4 ) A t t o r n e y , A g e n t ,

    or

    Firm

    * earne

    ordon

    LLP

    ( 5 7 ) CLAIM

    The

    r n a m e n t a l d e s i g n f o r

    a

    b a s k e t ,

    a s shown

    and

    d e s c r i b e d .

    DESCRIPTION

    FIG.

    1

    i s

    a

    p e r s p e c t i v e view

    of

    a

    b a s k e t showing our

    new

    d e s i g n ;

    F I G . 2 i s a t o p p l a n

    v i e w

    t h e r e o f ;

    F I G .

    3

    i s

    a

    r i g h t

    s i d e

    e l e v a t i o n a l view

    t h e r e o f , t h e l e f t

    s i d e

    e l e v a t i o n a l

    v i e w

    b e i n g i d e n t i c a l ;

    F I G . 4 i s a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ;

    F I G .

    5 i s a b o t t o m p l a n v i e w

    t h e r e o f ;

    FIG. 6 i s a p e r s p e c t i v e view

    of

    a

    second

    embodiment

    of

    a

    modi?ed

    q u a r e b a s k e t o f t h e d e s i g n

    shown

    n

    F I G .

    1 ;

    F I G . 7 i s a t o p p l a n

    v i e w

    t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 8 i s a f r o n t

    and

    s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ;

    F I G .

    9 i s

    a bottom

    p l a n

    view t h e r e o f ;

    FIG. 10

    i s

    a p e r s p e c t i v e

    view of

    a

    t h i r d

    embodiment

    of

    a

    modi?ed e c t a n g u l a r b a s k e t o f t h e d e s i g n shown n F I G . 1 ;

    F I G . 1 1

    i s a t o p p l a n v i e w t h e r e o f ;

    F I G . 1 2

    i s

    a

    r i g h t

    s i d e e l e v a t i o n a l v i e w , t h e l e f t s i d e e l e v a

    t i o n a l v i e w b e i n g

    i d e n t i c a l ;

    F I G . 1 3 i s

    a f r o n t e l e v a t i o n a l view h e r e o f ; a n d ,

    F I G . 1 4 i s a bottom p l a n

    view

    h e r e o f .

    The d o t t e d - l i n e s h o w i n g i n

    t h e d r a w i n g s

    i l l u s t r a t e s

    e n v i r o n

    m e n t a l m a t t e r and f o r m s

    no p a r t

    o f t h e c l a i m e d d e s i g n .

    1 C l a i m ,

    6

    Drawing S h e e t s

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 8. PageID #: 46

    H

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    47/57

    US D 6 4 8 , 1 3 1 S

    P a g e

    2

    US. PATENT

    DOCUMENTS

    D634,121 S *

    . D634,122 S

    *

    D616,680 S * 6/201 0 Snlder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. D6/513 13636999 S *

    D622,107 S

    8 / 2 0 1 0

    Goodman t a l . D637’000 S *

    D629,610 S 12/2010 Goodman t a l . ’

    D629,656

    S 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 Goodman

    t a 1 . *

    c i t e d by

    examiner

    3 / 2 0 1 1

    3 / 2 0 1 1

    5 / 2 0 1 1

    5 / 2 0 1 1

    Goodman t a 1 .

    . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    D3/306

    Goodman t a 1 .

    . .

    . D3/306

    Goodman t a 1 .

    . .

    . D3/306

    Goodman t a 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D3/306

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 8. PageID #: 47

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    48/57

    US. Patent

    N o v .

    8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t

    1

    o f 6

    US D648,131 S

    FIG.1

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 3 of 8. PageID #: 48

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    49/57

    US. Patent

    N o v .

    8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 2 o f 6 US

    D648,131 S

    1

    (v, (m

    Kin

    F I G .

    2

    \ N W W W / W

    A }

    \

    FIG

    4

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 4 of 8. PageID #: 49

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    50/57

    US. Patent

    N o v .

    8 , 2 0 1 1

    S h e e t 3

    o f 6 US

    D648,131 S

    F I G .

    6

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 5 of 8. PageID #: 50

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    51/57

    US. P a t e n t

    N O V .

    8 ,

    2 0 1 1

    S h e e t

    4 0 f

    6

    K V )

    K V

    US

    D 6 4 8 , 1 3 1

    S

    FIG. 7

    F I G .

    8

    F I G .

    9

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 6 of 8. PageID #: 51

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    52/57

    US. Patent

    N o v .

    8 , 2 0 1 1 S h e e t 5 o f 6

    US D648,131 S

    F I G . 1 0

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 7 of 8. PageID #: 52

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    53/57

    US. Patent

    N o v .

    8 , 2 0 1 1

    S h e e t 6

    o f 6 US

    D648,131 S

    F I G .

    11

    / /

    F I G . 1 2

    F I G . 1 4

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-8 Filed: 06/12/15 8 of 8. PageID #: 53

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    54/57

      CIVIL COVER SHEET

    (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)

    . (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS

    (b) 

    (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

     

     (c)  (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)   (If Known)

    I. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant

            PTF DEF PTF D

      (U.S. Government Not a Party)           or        

     

                  and        

    (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)  

                 

     

    V. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only)CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES

        PERSONAL INJURY   PERSONAL INJURY            

                     

                 

             

          PROPERTY RIGHTS    

             

                 

             

             

          LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY    

        PERSONAL PROPERTY            

                 

                         

                 

                     

                 

               

     REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS     FEDERAL TAX SUITS    

          Habeas Corpus:      

             

                       

         

         

              IMMIGRATION

      Other:                

          

         

     

     

    V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only)

     

     

     

       

      (specify)

     

    VI. CAUSE OF ACTION

    (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity)

     

    VII. REQUESTED IN

    COMPLAINT:

      CLASS ACTION

    DEMAND $  

    JURY DEMAND:        

    VIII. RELATED CASE(S)

    IF ANY(See instructions):

     

    FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

    SPECTRUM DIVERSIFIED DESIGNS, INC.

    Portage

    Mark C. Johnson; Kyle B. FlemingRenner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP

    621 Euclid Ave., 19th Floor, Cleveland Ohio 44115; p:216.621.1113

    HARMAN, INC.

    35 U.S.C § 271

    Design patent infringement

    06/12/2015 /s/ Mark C. Johnson

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-9 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 2. PageID #: 54

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    55/57

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

    . Civil Categories: (Please check one category only).

    1. General Civil

     2. Administrative Review/Social Security

     3. Habeas Corpus Death Penalty

    *If under Title 28, §2255, name the SENTENCING JUDGE:

      CASE NUMBER:

    I. RELATED OR REFILED CASES. See LR 3.1 which provides in pertinent part: "If an action is filed or removed to this Courtand assigned to a District Judge after which i t is discontinued, dismissed or remanded to a State court, and

    subsequently refiled, it shall be assigned to the same Judge who received the initial case assignment without regardfor 

    the place of holding court in which the case was refiled. Counsel or a party without counsel shall be responsible for 

    bringing such cases to the attention of the Court by responding to the questions included on the Civil Cover Sheet."

    This action is   RELATED to another  PENDING civil case. This action is   REFILED pursuant to LR 3.1.

    f applicable, please indicate on page 1 in section VIII, the name of the Judge and case number.

    II. In accordance with Local Civil Rule 3.8, actions involving counties in the Eastern Division shall be filed at any of thedivisional offices therein. Actions involving counties in the Western Division shall be filed at the Toledo office. For the

    purpose of determining the proper division, and for statistical reasons, the following information is requested.

     ANSWER ONE PARAGRAPH ONLY. ANSWER PARAGRAPHS 1 THRU 3 IN ORDER. UPON FINDING WHICH

    PARAGRAPH APPLIES TO YOUR CASE, ANSWER IT AND STOP.

    (1) Resident defendant. If the defendant resides in a county within this district, please set forth the name of suchcounty

    COUNTY:

    Corporation For the purpose of answering the above, a corporation is deemed to be a resident of that county in which

    it has its principal place of business in that district.

    (2) Non-Resident defendant. If no defendant is a resident of a county in this district, please set forth the county

    wherein the cause of action arose or the event complained of occurred.COUNTY:

    (3) Other Cases. If no defendant is a resident of this district, or if the defendant is a corporation not having a principle

    place of business within the district, and the cause of action arose or the event complained of occurred outside

    this district, please set forth the county of the plaintiff's residence.

    COUNTY:

    V. The Counties in the Northern District of Ohio are divided into divisions as shown below. After the county isdetermined in Section III, please check the appropriate division.

    EASTERN DIVISION

      AKRON (Counties: Carroll, Holmes, Portage, Stark, Summit, Tuscarawas and Wayne)  CLEVELAND (Counties: Ashland, Ashtabula, Crawford, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake,

    Lorain, Medina and Richland)  YOUNGSTOWN (Counties: Columbiana, Mahoning and Trumbull)

    WESTERN DIVISION

      TOLEDO (Counties: Allen, Auglaize, Defiance, Erie, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, Henry,Huron, Lucas, Marion, Mercer, Ottawa, Paulding, Putnam, Sandusky, Seneca

     VanWert, Williams, Wood and Wyandot)

    Portage County, OH

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-9 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 2. PageID #: 55

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    56/57

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

    U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

     __________ District of __________

    )

    ))))))

    Plaintiff 

    v. Civil Action No.

     Defendant 

    SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

    To: (Defendant’s name and address)

    A lawsuit has been filed against you.

    Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if youare the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,whose name and address are:

    If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

    CLERK OF COURT 

    Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk 

      Northern District of Ohio

    SPECTRUM DIVERSIFIED DESIGNS, INC.

    5:15-cv-1182

    HARMAN, INC.

    Harman, Inc.310 Annagem Blvd.

    Mississauga, ON L5T 2V5Canada

    Mark C. Johnson

    Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid Avenue, 19th Floor Cleveland, Ohio 44115(216) 621-1113

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-10 Filed: 06/12/15 1 of 2. PageID #: 56

  • 8/21/2019 Spectrum Diversified Designs v. Harman - Complaint

    57/57

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

    Civil Action No.

    PROOF OF SERVICE

    (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

    This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

    was received by me on (date) .

    I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

    on (date) ; or 

    I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

    , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

    on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or 

    I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

     designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

    on (date) ; or 

    I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or  

    Other (specify):

    .

    My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

    I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

    Date:Server’s signature

    Printed name and title

    Server’s address

    5:15-cv-1182

    0.00

    Case: 5:15-cv-01182-JRA Doc #: 1-10 Filed: 06/12/15 2 of 2. PageID #: 57