16
SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0 Group Standard Speaking Up Where someone believes they have information which demonstrates malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of our Code of Conduct or values, they are required to Speak Up. This can be done without fear of reprisal

Speaking Up - my.serco.com · SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0 1 Objectives Serco takes malpractice and impropriety extremely seriously. We will maintain an effective

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Group Standard

    Speaking Up

    Where someone believes they have information which

    demonstrates malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of

    our Code of Conduct or values, they are required to Speak Up. This can be done

    without fear of reprisal

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Document Details Document Details Serco Business

    Reference

    SMS GS-BC3

    Version

    2

    Approval Date

    December 2019

    Date for next review

    December 2021

    Applicability

    Serco Group covering all business regions, operating companies and business units throughout the world1 covering: - employees, officers, directors and individuals working as consultants and

    contractors and any other parties acting as representatives or agents of

    Serco both current and former (Employees)

    - wholly owned subsidiaries and majority-owned operations - Serco’s suppliers, partners and customers;

    - Relatives and dependants of the above. Where a minority interest and in regard to its subcontractors and suppliers

    Serco encourages alignment with this Standard

    Authority

    Chief Executive, Serco Group plc

    Accountable Policy Owner (Group)

    Group Company Secretary

    Additional Information

    Supporting standards, standard operating procedures and guidance relating to

    this Group Standard are available within the Serco Management System

    Governance

    Our policies and standards, together with any regional or market requirements and enhancements to them, are authorised through a robust governance

    process

    Consequence Management As a Group Standard the requirements detailed in this document are mandated

    and must be adhered to. Non-compliance will have consequences which may

    include disciplinary action. The Consequence Management Group Standard (Ref: SMS-GS-G1) details how instances of non-compliance will be dealt with

    1As used herein, Serco Group and its affiliates, subsidiaries and operating companies are referred

    to as ‘Serco’, the ‘Company’ or ‘company’, or ‘we’, ‘us’ or ‘our’.

    Contents

    1 Objectives ........................................................................................... 2

    2 Policy Standards .................................................................................. 2

    2.1 Contacting the Company .............................................................. 2

    2.2 Complaint handling and investigation ............................................ 3

    2.3 Complaint closure and final report ................................................. 4

    2.4 Safeguards .................................................................................. 4

    2.5 Non-retaliation ............................................................................. 5

    2.6 Reporting and oversight ............................................................... 5

    3 Responsibilities & Accountabilities ......................................................... 5

    4 Processes and Controls ........................................................................ 7

    4.1 Governance processes and controls ............................................... 7

    4.2 Key processes and controls ......................................................... 12

    5 Supporting documentation and guidance ............................................ 14

    6 Definitions......................................................................................... 14

    7 Further information and support ......................................................... 15

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    1 Objectives

    Serco takes malpractice and impropriety extremely seriously. We will

    maintain an effective mechanism and processes to deal with legitimate concerns and/or complaints in a responsible and effective

    manner. Those concerns may be in the public interest or relate to internal poor practice.

    Where someone believes they have information which demonstrates malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of our Code of Conduct or values, they

    are required to raise the issue and bring it to management’s attention. This can be done without fear of reprisal.

    Speaking up (or whistleblowing) is the responsibility of every employee. This Standard covers those concerns that:

    • are in the public interest (as governed by applicable statutory or

    regulatory provisions) including failure to comply with a legal obligation or

    statutes or criminal activity

    • relate to non-compliance with company policies; or

    • are violations of our Code of Conduct

    Circumstances which should be reported include, but are not limited to:

    • behaviour inconsistent with our values

    • improper conduct, an improper state of affairs or unethical behaviour,

    through actions such as:

    ➢ harassment, violence or bullying

    ➢ abuse of human rights

    ➢ drug or alcohol abuse

    ➢ conflicts of interest

    ➢ improper use of social media

    ➢ dangers to health and safety or the environment including conduct that

    represents a danger to the public

    ➢ misuse of confidential information or reporting

    ➢ improper use of company assets

    • illegal behaviour such as:

    ➢ giving or receiving of bribes or other improper advantages

    ➢ insider trading

    ➢ competition or anti-trust violations

    ➢ financial malpractice or impropriety or fraud

    • actions which would adversely affect the Company’s reputation

    • attempts to conceal any of these

    Reports submitted to Serco that allege malpractice or impropriety will be

    investigated and depending on the results of such investigations may lead to

    other actions by the Company.

    The tools Serco has provided to allow employees to report misdeeds or improper behaviour are not designed to question financial or business

    decisions when properly taken by the Company nor should it be used to

    reconsider any matters which have already been addressed under grievance, disciplinary or any other Company procedures.

    2 Policy Standards

    2.1 Contacting the Company

    S1. In the first instance employees are encouraged to talk to their line manager if they have information which demonstrates malpractice,

    wrongdoing or violations of our Code of Conduct or values

    S2. If this is uncomfortable for the employee, impractical or if the employee

    believes matters should be reported outside of their line management, a

    variety of options to communicate concerns exist, including reporting to:

    a. a member of the Human Resources department

    b. an Ethics/Compliance representative

    c. a Serco legal representative or

    d. the Company Secretary

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    S3. Some divisions may provide country specific ethics hotlines to meet local requirements, or other reporting mechanisms which employees are

    encouraged to use

    S4. In addition to those mechanisms for reporting concerns above,

    employees or external third parties may also use the following:

    a. calling the appropriate confidential Speak Up Hotline (provided by an independent third party offering free phone numbers on

    countries where we operate and language translation as appropriate)1;

    b. using a secure web-based self-reporting system2

    c. emailing3; or

    d. writing4

    S5. It is a fundamental requirement of an employee’s obligations that they professionally carry out their duties and not disclose confidential

    information about the employer’s affairs. Nevertheless, where an individual discovers information that they believe demonstrates

    malpractice or wrongdoing anywhere within the Company, then this

    information must be disclosed without fear of reprisal and, where appropriate, independently of line management.

    S6. Right to Speak to Government/ Local Regulator. The duty of confidentiality does not bar an Employee from speaking to government authorities having

    jurisdiction over the matter at issue where the employee so desires. Likewise, an Employee may also seek external legal counsel advice

    regarding his/her concern and/or issue. For sake of clarity, an external

    legal counsel is not a Serco in-house legal counsel but an independent legal qualified practitioner under applicable local laws. Costs for seeking

    such advice will be at the Employee’s personal charge (and not expensed

    to Serco).

    1 Details of free phone numbers are detailed in Serco’s Code of Conduct and www.serco.com/codeofconduct 2 www.tnwinc.com/serco 3 [email protected] or [email protected] for Serco Americas

    2.2 Complaint handling and investigation

    S7. A procedure will be implemented for the handling and reporting of

    malpractice or impropriety

    S8. Any manager notified of an issue will:

    a. ensure issues raised are taken seriously, properly reviewed, an

    objective assessment made and raised to Divisional or Group level Ethics Leads for reporting or/and management if required

    b. report it in line with Serco’s Incident Reporting and Management

    Procedures5

    c. where an independent investigation is conducted, ensure full

    provision of accurate and complete information and appropriate and timely participation of themselves and their employees

    d. inform the reporter whether an investigation will be conducted and timescales

    e. ensure that all necessary and appropriate actions to resolve valid

    issues are taken

    f. where appropriate, provide feedback to the reporter on the outcome

    and any action taken

    g. ensure there is no retaliation against any employee for raising an

    issue

    S9. Speak Up issues will be handled in accordance with Serco’s Speak Up issues handling procedures6

    S10. All issues will be reviewed and/or investigated by appropriate representative(s) of Serco

    S11. The purpose of any investigation will be to gather and establish the facts relating to specific incidents, events, claims or allegations

    S12. Investigations will be thorough, fair, balanced, transparent and, where

    appropriate, conducted under legal privilege

    S13. There should be no unreasonable delay in conducting and concluding

    any investigation

    4 Company Secretary, Serco Group plc, Serco House, 16 Bartley Wood Business Park, Bartley Way, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UY or 1818 Library Street, Suite 1000, Reston, VA 20190 United States for Serco Americas 5 see Incident & Fraud Reporting and Management GSOP Ref SMS GSOP-O1-2 6 See Speak Up Issue Handling GSOP Ref SMS GSOP-BC3-1

    http://www.serco.com/codeofconducthttp://www.tnwinc.com/sercomailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    S14. The investigator’s role will be to provide facts to enable informed decision making

    2.3 Complaint closure and final report

    S15. The case manager will retain ownership for updates and case closure

    S16. When there is enough evidence to conclude a review, the case may be

    considered closed. Any investigation should produce a report and make recommendations if appropriate

    S17. Upon completion of an investigation, depending on the nature of the

    findings, some feedback on the outcome of the case, will be provided to the original reporter of the issue. This should be placed on the system if

    the reporter remained anonymous

    S18. If the reporter is not satisfied with the outcome of the investigation and

    has appropriate grounds for appeal, this appeal will be submitted in writing, and will be reviewed by the Group Speak Up Lead or nominated

    delegate

    S19. Recommendations and actions should be acted upon at a Division or Group level and the data used for internal reporting and

    communications

    2.4 Safeguards

    S20. Serco will protect any employee who discloses issues provided from

    adverse employment action unless it is proved they have been made in bad faith

    S21. Direct or indirect victimisation of any person using this Standard will be

    regarded as a serious disciplinary offence

    S22. The identity of the individual raising the issue and/or any information

    which is likely to lead to his/her identification must be kept confidential so long as it does not compromise, hinder or otherwise frustrate any

    investigation. Where necessary or required by law, such information or identity of the individual raising the issue will need to be disclosed to: (i)

    appropriate local government body, (ii) a member of the local police,

    (iii) another prescribed person or (iv) otherwise with the consent of the individual raising the issue.

    S23. Employees may report concerns anonymously if they wish; however, if an individual is willing to provide their details it will enable further detail to

    be obtained from them, if required as part of the subsequent investigation,

    and reports made back to them

    S24. Anonymous reports will be appropriately reviewed based upon the

    information reported; however Serco encourages individuals to report their issues directly since it believes that the ability to follow up with the

    reporting individual can aid in ensuring an appropriate review of issues raised

    S25. Serco will conduct an initial review in order to determine whether appropriate and adequate information exists upon which to conduct an

    investigation. In exercising this discretion, the factors to be taken into

    account will include the:

    a. seriousness of the issues raised, including determining whether the

    basis of the allegation more properly represents a divisional or contract management issue versus a malpractice or impropriety

    allegation

    b. credibility of the issue based upon the information presented and readily identifiable facts

    c. level of sufficient detail provided and whether an investigation can be initiated

    d. likelihood of confirming the issue from attributable sources or the ability to identify other information to assess the issue

    S26. The initial case review will also assess if the issue needs to be

    investigated under legal privilege, where this may apply

    S27. Where an investigation is undertaken under legal privilege all

    documentation will be marked ‘legally privileged and confidential’ and access to any investigation report and associated documentation will be

    limited to those who have specific involvement in the management of

    the case

    S28. If an individual makes malicious or vexatious allegations or otherwise

    acts in bad faith, they may be subject to disciplinary action

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    2.5 Non-retaliation

    S29. Periodic assessment of cases will be undertaken to ensure that reporters

    of issues have not been retaliated against

    S30. Where retaliation has been alleged it will be investigated and if found to be valid, appropriate disciplinary action will be taken against those

    involved

    2.6 Reporting and oversight

    S31. Incidents relating to Business integrity (bribery, kickbacks or facilitation

    payments, fraud, money laundering, falsification of company records or misreporting, misuse of confidential/personal data, breaches of

    sanctions, competition law or export controls) should be recorded on

    the Speak Up case management system.

    S32. The Corporate Responsibility and Risk Committee, Executive Committee

    and Divisional Executive Management Team will receive reports on issues raised, ensure agreed actions have been taken and monitor

    trends that may require management action

    S33. Serco will include within its Corporate Responsibility Report an overview

    of issues raised and their status

    S34. On a periodic basis completed issues will be used as anonymous case examples to raise awareness of the system and its effective

    management

    3 Responsibilities & Accountabilities S35. The following responsibilities will apply to the delivery of the defined

    standards. If these are not completed effectively, the person

    responsible will be accountable for any consequences7.

    Group

    S36. The Group CEO will appoint a Group Speak Up Lead responsible for:

    a. developing and maintaining Group Speak Up policy b. ensuring standards and associated procedures and key controls

    remain fit for purpose, reflect legislative and regulatory

    requirements and provide effective mechanisms to report and

    7 See Consequence Management Group Standard Ref: SMS-GS-G1

    respond to concerns regarding malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of our Code of Conduct or values

    c. providing oversight and reporting speak up performance

    Division

    S37. The Divisional CEO will appoint a Divisional Speak Up Lead responsible

    for: a. implementing Speak Up strategy and policy, standards, procedures

    and key controls across the Division; which may include the development of country/region/Divisional procedures and

    management systems b. ensuring effective mechanisms to report and respond to concerns

    regarding malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of our Code of

    Conduct or values are implemented, remain fit for purpose and reflect legislative and regulatory requirements

    c. providing oversight and reporting Divisional Speak Up performance

    S38. Any manager notified of an issue regarding malpractice or impropriety is

    responsible for:

    a. reviewing all allegations in an objective manner b. reporting it in line with Serco’s Incident Reporting and Management

    Procedures8 c. ‘ensuring it is recorded on the Speak Up case management system’

    d. determining, with support from an Ethics representative, HR, legal representative or the Company Secretary if required, whether an

    investigation should take place

    e. providing accurate, complete and timely information to any independent investigation conducted

    f. keeping the complainant updated with progress and providing feedback, where appropriate

    g. ensuring all necessary and appropriate actions are taken to resolve

    valid issues h. ensuring no retaliation against any employee for raising an issue

    Contract/Function

    S39. The Contract Manager (or Corporate Function Head) is responsible for:

    a. complying with Speak Up policy, standards, procedures and key

    controls

    8 see Incident & Fraud Reporting and Management GSOP Ref SMS GSOP-O1-2

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    b. Ensuring their employees are aware of how they can raise issues

    and how these issues will be handled

    All employees

    S40. All employees are responsible for:

    a. Reporting any malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of our Code of

    Conduct or values b. implementing remedial action where a violation has taken place

    c. professionally carrying out their duties and not disclosing confidential information about Serco

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    4 Processes and Controls

    4.1 Governance processes and controls

    Process A set of related activities that must be carried out to achieve policy

    outcomes

    Ref Description

    Controls The action we put in place to mitigate a risk(s) within a key process and/or the delivery of policy outcomes. These are mandated and are the minimum that should be implemented

    regardless of any local difference

    Ref Description

    Responsibility

    for ensuring controls are in place and

    operating effectively

    Gro

    up

    (S

    33

    )

    Div

    isio

    n

    (S3

    4 &

    S3

    5)

    Bu

    sin

    ess U

    nit

    (S3

    2)

    Co

    ntr

    act

    (S3

    6)

    All

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    (S3

    7)

    P1 Speak Up Responsibilities are defined and

    understood

    C1 A Group Speak Up Lead is appointed by the

    Group CEO with responsibility for:

    • Developing and maintaining Group

    Speak Up Policy

    • Ensuring standards and associated

    procedures and key controls remain fit

    for purpose, reflect legislative and regulatory requirements and provide

    effective mechanisms to report and respond to concerns regarding

    malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of

    our Code of Conduct or values

    • Providing oversight and reporting speak

    up performance

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Process A set of related activities that must be carried out to achieve policy

    outcomes

    Ref Description

    Controls The action we put in place to mitigate a risk(s) within a key process and/or the delivery of policy outcomes. These are mandated and are the minimum that should be implemented

    regardless of any local difference

    Ref Description

    Responsibility

    for ensuring controls are in place and

    operating effectively

    Gro

    up

    (S

    33

    )

    Div

    isio

    n

    (S3

    4 &

    S3

    5)

    Bu

    sin

    ess U

    nit

    (S3

    2)

    Co

    ntr

    act

    (S3

    6)

    All

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    (S3

    7)

    C2 A Divisional Speak Up lead is appointed by the Divisional CEO with responsibility for:

    • Implementing speak up strategy and

    policy, standards, procedures and key controls across the division; which may

    include the development of

    country/region/divisional procedures and management systems

    • Ensuring effective mechanisms to report

    and respond to concerns regarding malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of

    our Code of Conduct or values are implemented, remain fit for purpose

    and reflect legislative and regulatory

    requirements

    • Providing oversight and reporting divisional speak up performance

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Process A set of related activities that must be carried out to achieve policy

    outcomes

    Ref Description

    Controls The action we put in place to mitigate a risk(s) within a key process and/or the delivery of policy outcomes. These are mandated and are the minimum that should be implemented

    regardless of any local difference

    Ref Description

    Responsibility

    for ensuring controls are in place and

    operating effectively

    Gro

    up

    (S

    33

    )

    Div

    isio

    n

    (S3

    4 &

    S3

    5)

    Bu

    sin

    ess U

    nit

    (S3

    2)

    Co

    ntr

    act

    (S3

    6)

    All

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    (S3

    7)

    C3 Any manager notified of an issue regarding

    malpractice or impropriety is responsible

    for:

    • Reviewing all allegations in an objective

    manner

    • Reporting in line with Serco’s Incident Reporting and Management Procedures

    • Ensuring it is recorded on the Speak Up

    case management system

    • Determining, with support from an

    Ethics representative, HR, legal representative or the Company

    Secretary if required, whether an investigation should take place

    • Providing accurate, complete and timely

    information to any independent

    investigation conducted

    • Keeping the complainant updated with progress and providing feedback, where

    appropriate

    • Ensuring all necessary and appropriate actions are taken to resolve valid issues

    • Ensuring no retaliation against any

    employee for raising an issue

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Process A set of related activities that must be carried out to achieve policy

    outcomes

    Ref Description

    Controls The action we put in place to mitigate a risk(s) within a key process and/or the delivery of policy outcomes. These are mandated and are the minimum that should be implemented

    regardless of any local difference

    Ref Description

    Responsibility

    for ensuring controls are in place and

    operating effectively

    Gro

    up

    (S

    33

    )

    Div

    isio

    n

    (S3

    4 &

    S3

    5)

    Bu

    sin

    ess U

    nit

    (S3

    2)

    Co

    ntr

    act

    (S3

    6)

    All

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    (S3

    7)

    C4 Contract Managers (or Corporate Function Heads) are responsible for:

    • Complying with Speak Up policy,

    standards, procedures and key controls

    • Ensuring their employees are aware of how they can raise issues and how

    these issues will be handled

    C5 All employees are responsible for:

    • Reporting any malpractice, wrongdoing or violations of our Code of Conduct or

    values

    • Implementing remedial action where a violation has taken place

    • professionally carrying out their duties

    and not disclosing confidential information about Serco

    P2 Establish Speak Up policy C6 Speak Up Policy, standards and Group

    procedures are defined and published

    C7 Policy requirements are communicated and

    implemented

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Process A set of related activities that must be carried out to achieve policy

    outcomes

    Ref Description

    Controls The action we put in place to mitigate a risk(s) within a key process and/or the delivery of policy outcomes. These are mandated and are the minimum that should be implemented

    regardless of any local difference

    Ref Description

    Responsibility

    for ensuring controls are in place and

    operating effectively

    Gro

    up

    (S

    33

    )

    Div

    isio

    n

    (S3

    4 &

    S3

    5)

    Bu

    sin

    ess U

    nit

    (S3

    2)

    Co

    ntr

    act

    (S3

    6)

    All

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    (S3

    7)

    P3 Establish Speak Up systems and process C8 Appropriate systems and procedures are in

    place to receive, assess, investigate, take action and report on issues raised

    C9 Systems and procedures are periodically reviewed and updated

    C10 The contract location database on The Network System is reviewed quarterly

    P4 Compliance assessment and audit C11 Assessment questionnaires monitoring potential retaliation and user experience

    have been completed on a periodic basis

    C12 Compliance plans include an assessment of Speak Up procedures

    C13 Compliance and audit reports have action plans to address any identified non-

    compliance

    C14 Agreed actions are closed out

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    4.2 Key processes and controls

    Process A set of related activities that must be carried out to achieve policy

    outcomes

    Ref Description

    Controls The action we put in place to mitigate a risk(s) within a key process and/or the delivery of policy outcomes. These are mandated and are the minimum that should be implemented

    regardless of any local difference

    Ref Description

    Responsibility

    for ensuring controls are in place and operating

    effectively

    Gro

    up

    (S

    33

    )

    Div

    isio

    n

    (S3

    4 &

    S3

    5)

    Bu

    sin

    ess U

    nit

    (S3

    2)

    Co

    ntr

    act

    (S3

    6)

    All

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    (S3

    7)

    P5 Communication, awareness and trust C15 All employees have been made aware of

    the importance of speaking up, how to raise issues and the company’s position in

    regard to safeguarding against retaliation

    C16 A selection of completed issues have been

    published as case examples to raise

    awareness and build trust

    P6 Manage investigations C17 Cases are managed on The Network

    system with appropriate information to ensure comprehensive records are

    maintained

    C18 Acknowledgment of issues raised is made

    within 48 hours of receipt and include a

    statement in regard to safeguards against retaliation

    C19 Investigations are completed within agreed timescales

    P7 Complaint closure and final report C20 A report is produced, making recommendations where appropriate,

    following investigations

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Process A set of related activities that must be carried out to achieve policy

    outcomes

    Ref Description

    Controls The action we put in place to mitigate a risk(s) within a key process and/or the delivery of policy outcomes. These are mandated and are the minimum that should be implemented

    regardless of any local difference

    Ref Description

    Responsibility

    for ensuring controls are in place and operating

    effectively

    Gro

    up

    (S

    33

    )

    Div

    isio

    n

    (S3

    4 &

    S3

    5)

    Bu

    sin

    ess U

    nit

    (S3

    2)

    Co

    ntr

    act

    (S3

    6)

    All

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    (S3

    7)

    C21 Depending on the nature of the

    investigation, some feedback is provided to the original reporter upon completion

    C22 The Group Speak Up Lead reviews any appeals following an investigation, within

    agreed timescales

    C23 Recommendations and actions are

    completed following an investigation, with

    information communicated as appropriate to enable learning and continuous

    improvement

    C24 Incidents relating to Business integrity are

    recorded on the Speak Up case management system’

    C25 Quarterly reports are produced which include as a minimum:

    • an overview of significant cases

    • trends and data on new cases by type

    • cases still open by type

    • average time to handle cases

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    5 Supporting documentation and guidance

    The following should be read in conjunction with this standard:

    Ref Document

    SMS-GS-G1 Consequence Management Group Standard

    SMS GSOP-BC3-1 Speak Up issues Handling GSOP

    Code of Conduct

    6 Definitions

    Term Definition

    Accountability Being accountable means being not only

    responsible for something but also answerable for

    your actions.

    Responsibility A responsible person is the individual who completes the task required. Responsibility can be

    shared and delegated.

    All responsible persons will also be accountable

    for completing tasks effectively. Non-compliance will have consequences which may include

    disciplinary action as defined within the

    Consequence Management Group Standard.

    Group Serco Group plc is the administrative centre of

    the organisation, responsible for setting corporate strategy, defining governance requirements and

    supporting the business in its day to day

    operations

    Division The Group will define a set of business divisions

    which will be responsible for business delivery

    within a defined set of markets or geographies.

    Business Unit A Business Unit is a cluster of contracts which provide a similar service e.g. Health, Defence,

    Transport etc.

    Where appropriate, a separate legal entity wholly owned or where Serco has a controlling share

    may also be referred to as a Business Unit, where

    appropriate.

    This may also refer to Counties/Territories

  • SMS GS-BC3 – Speaking Up – December 2019 – v2.0

    Contract A Contract provides specified requirements to a customer (either directly with Serco or to a

    consortium/Joint Venture in which Serco is a

    party)

    A Contract will also refer to a corporate/functional

    area.

    Corporate/functional areas are functions which

    support the business and they include finance,

    HR, procurement etc.

    Contract Manager This refers to a manager with responsibility for managing the performance of a contract and can

    include a Contract Manager on a day-to-day basis

    (or Operational Manager with devolved responsibility), a Contract Manager, Partnership

    Director and/or a Business Unit Managing Director

    Conflict of Interest -

    personal

    A personal conflict of interest occurs when your

    private interests interfere, or could appear to

    interfere, with the best interests of Serco

    Conflicts of Interest

    - organisational

    Organisational conflicts of interest occur when,

    because of the activities or relationships with others, an unfair competitive advantage may

    result; impartial assistance or advice cannot be

    provided; or where objectivity may be impaired

    Direct or Indirect

    Victimisation

    Direct victimisation is when someone treats you

    unfavourably

    Indirect victimisation is when a requirement,

    condition or practice appears to be the same for everyone but actually disadvantages a certain

    group

    Malpractice Malpractice is action resulting from an instance of reprehensible ignorance, negligence or

    incompetence or through criminal intent

    Retaliation Retaliation is where action is taken to harass, fire, demote or otherwise ‘retaliate’ against an

    individual because they have raised an issue or grievance, provided information because of a

    complaint, reasonably asserted their rights or

    made an allegation that a person has acted

    unlawfully

    Whistleblowing Whistleblowing is the reporting of misconduct, alleged dishonest or illegal activity which may be

    occurring in an organisation

    Wrongdoing Wrongdoing is the result of behaviour or action

    which is wrong, evil or blameworthy or against

    the company’s values.

    7 Further information and support If you require any further information or support regarding this Group

    Standard, or if you have any suggestions for improvement, please contact the Accountable Policy Owner (Group) or email [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]