Upload
donald-jumper
View
244
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
1/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 1
Spanking&CorporalPunishment
Spanking&CorporalPunishmentResearchreport
DonaldJumper
SOWK300-01
Ms.McAruthur
Oct10,2010
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
2/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 2
Abstract
ThisresearchpaperwillcompareandanalyzevariousTuskegeeuniversitystudentsviewsonspankingandcorporalpunishment.Thisresearchpaperwillalsomeasure
suchvaluesasgender,class,andagewithrespecttonumerousquestionstoobtaina
detailedsummaryoftheviewsofstudents.ThegoalofthisresearchpaperistointerprettheviewsofstudentsonSpankingandCorporalpunishment.Thisresearch
paperwillusesuchtoolsasgraphs,charts,andtablestopresentitsfindings.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
3/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 3
Introduction
1. DescriptionoftheProblem-Theproblemwearemeasuringistheviewsof
TuskegeeUniversitystudentsonintentionalinflictionofpainonthebodyfor
thepurposeofpunishment,whichisclassifiedasSpankingandCorporal
Punishment.
2. AttributestobemeasuredWearemeasuringsuchattributes,asthe
opinionsandbeliefsTuskegeeuniversitystudentshaveonspankingand
CorporalpunishmentmyPerceptionsisthattheviewswillvarydepending
oniftheindividualreceivedspankingsfromhisorherparents.Thefindings
willalsobecomparedwithdifferentvariablesandvaluesineffortstobetter
obtainamoredetailedconclusion.Itismybeliefthatmostmenandwomen
arefavorabletowardspankingandcorporalpunishment.
3. Hypothesis-IhypothesizethatmajorityofTuskegeeUniversitystudents
agreewithSpankingandCorporalfordisciplinaryuse.HoweverIexpectmy
findingstoshowahugedisparityintheviewsofmenonspankingand
Corporalpunishmentversestheviewsofwomen.Iwillusesuchtoolsasa
bivariatetableandmultivariatetopresentthesefindings.SincemostAfrican
AmericanspracticeSpankingIstronglyfeelstudentswillsupportspanking
asawhole.
4. Istronglyfeelthatmyfindingswillshowthatgenderwillhasmostdisparity.
Secondlyclassificationsincemostfreshmenarejustbecomingadultsand
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
4/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 4
makingthereowndecisionstheywillprobablynotsupportspankingand
Corporalpunishmenthowevermostupperclassmenwill.Alsotheage
variablewillsupportthispremisethatolderstudentshavedifferentviews
whencomparedtoyoungerstudentsontheissueofspankingandcorporal
punishment.
5. Results
Age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
1 31 28.2 28.2 28.2
2 63 57.3 57.3 85.5
3 14 12.7 12.7 98.2
4 2 1.8 1.8 100.0
Valid
Total 110 100.0 100.0
Class
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent1 15 13.6 13.6 13.6
2 45 40.9 40.9 54.5
3 16 14.5 14.5 69.1
4 20 18.2 18.2 87.3
5 7 6.4 6.4 93.6
6 7 6.4 6.4 100.0
Valid
Total 110 100.0 100.0
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
1 47 42.7 42.7 42.7Valid
2 63 57.3 57.3 100.0
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
5/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 5
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
1 47 42.7 42.7 42.7
2 63 57.3 57.3 100.0Total 110 100.0 100.0
Dispk
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
1 51 46.4 47.2 47.2
2 57 51.8 52.8 100.0
Valid
Total 108 98.2 100.0
Missing System 2 1.8
Total 110 100.0
LikelySpk
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
1 3 2.7 2.8 2.8
2 25 22.7 22.9 25.7
3 31 28.2 28.4 54.1
4 37 33.6 33.9 88.1
5 13 11.8 11.9 100.0
Valid
Total 109 99.1 100.0
Missing System 1 .9
Total 110 100.0
PrntSpk
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
1 74 67.3 67.3 67.3
2 36 32.7 32.7 100.0
Valid
Total 110 100.0 100.0
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
6/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 6
UseCorp
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent1 66 60.0 60.0 60.0
2 44 40.0 40.0 100.0
Valid
Total 110 100.0 100.0
CorpBett
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
1 53 48.2 49.5 49.5
2 54 49.1 50.5 100.0
Valid
Total 107 97.3 100.0
Missing System 3 2.7
Total 110 100.0
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
7/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 7
List of Graphs
AGE
ThisgraphshowstheageoftheTuskegeeUniversitystudentswho
participatedinthesurvey.Asitclearlyillustratesthemajorityofthe
participantswerebetweentheages21-24.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
8/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 8
Class
Thisgrowsshowstheclassificationofthestudentssurveyed,Thenumberof
sophomoreswhotookthesurveyisalmostdoubletheamountofgraduatesand
seniors.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
9/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 9
Thisgraphshowthegenderofthesurveyedparticipantsitwasaslightdisparityin
theamountofwomenwhoparticipatedversesthenumberofmen.
Discussionofbackgroundvariables-Thesebackgroundvariableswerechosento
helpgetabetterunderstandingofthetypesofstudentbeingsurveyedandto
understandhowtheymefeelincomparisontoeachotherbasedonbackground
information.Thesebackgroundvariableswillbecomparedwithseveralquestions
ineffortsforustounderstandthethoughtsofthestudents.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
10/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 10
Thisgraphshowsthesurveyedparticipantsresponsetothequestion:doyouthink
itsokaytospankchildrenasameansofdiscipline?
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
11/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 11
Thisgraphshowsthesurveyedparticipantsresponsetothequestion:Howlikelydo
youthinkyouwillspankyourchildrenasameansofdiscipline?
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
12/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 12
Thisgraphillustratesthatsurveyedparticipantsresponsetothequestion:ShouldparentsbeallowedtouseCorporalpunishmenttodisciplinetheirchildren?
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
13/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 13
Thisgraphshowsthesurveyedparticipantsresponsetothequestions:Didyourparentsspankyouasameansofdiscipline?
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
14/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 14
Thisgraphillustratesthesurveyedparticipantsresponsetothequestion:Does
Corporalpunishmentworkbetterthenotherdisciplinarymethodsthatdont
involvephysicalpain.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
15/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 15
Thequestionshowsthesurveyedparticipantsresponsetothequestionhaveyou
everbeenintroublewiththepolice?
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
16/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 16
Thisquestionillustratesthesurveyedparticipantsresponsetothequestionoverall
doyouthinkthatyoudeservedthepunishmentthatyourparents/guardiansused
onyouwhenyouwereachild?
Discussionofquestionnairesthesequestionnairesareusedtohelpdefinethe
viewsof thepersonbeingsurveyedbycomparing thesequestionswewillhavea
deeper understanding of how individuals may differ and agree on issues as it
pertains to spanking and corporal punishment. Therefore by using these
questionnaireswewillhaveconcreteevidencetobackoutfindings.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
17/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 17
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
18/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 18
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
19/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 19
Bivariate graph discussion These graphs show the bivariate relationship
betweenvariouslevelsofanalyzesuchasgenderandhowlikelytheyaretospank
theirchildren.Thisinformationwillbehelpfulbecomesitgivesevidencetosupport
that men are more likely to spank their children over women and therefore
supportingmyhypothesis.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
20/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 20
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
21/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 21
MultivariateDiscussion-Thesetablesshowtherelationshipbasedonamultivariatelevelsanalyzingseveralvariablessuchasclassficationinrespectto
howlikelytheyaretousecorporalpunishmentontherechildrenandalsocompares
outofthosethatsurveyedhowmanywereactuallywerespankedgrowingup.
WhichwillhelpmyresearchinprovingthatmostsupportersofSpankingand
Corporalpunishmentwillbethosewhoreceiveditaschildren.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
22/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 22
Additionalanalyst
Dispk * Class Crosstabulation
Count
Class
1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
1 9 25 7 7 1 2 51Dispk
2 6 19 9 12 6 5 57Total 15 44 16 19 7 7 108
LikelySpk * Class CrosstabulationCount
Class
1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
2 4 11 4 1 2 3 25
3 5 12 6 4 2 2 31
4 4 17 3 10 2 1 37
LikelySpk
5 1 3 2 5 1 1 13
Total 15 45 15 20 7 7 109
PrntSpk * Class Crosstabulation
Count
Class
1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
1 10 26 12 16 5 5 74PrntSpk
2 5 19 4 4 2 2 36
Total 15 45 16 20 7 7 110
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
23/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 23
Conclusion
InconclusionthrewtheresearchgatheredIwasabletosupportmyhypothesiswith
myfindingsandillustratethemthrewgraphs,charts,andtables.AlsoIused
bivariatetablestosupportseveralkeyfactsthatIfoundinmyresearchaswellas
multivariatetablestosupportmyfindings.Spankingandcorporalpunishmentisa
verycontroversialissueandwillremainonaslongasparentscontinuethepractice.
HowevermanyyoungTuskegeestudentsfeelastheywillnotspanktheirchildrenas
ameansofdiscipline.ThevastdisparitywasfoundinageasIstatedinmy
hypothesisitwouldbe.ThereforeIconcludethatspankingandCorporal
punishmentisusedcommonlybyparentsasameansofdisciplineandmostyoung
TuskegeeStudentsdonotagreewiththosemethodshoweverupperclassmen21-24
believetheywillpracticespankingontherechildren.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
24/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 24
DraftofQuestionnaire
SPANKING & CORPORAL
PUNISHMENT SURVEY #1 InformedConsent
This questionnaire is meant to assess the views and opinions on spankingand Corporal punishment of Tuskegee University students about Views onSpanking and Corporal punishment .It fulfills a course requirement forSOWK 300.please do not write your name on this questionnaire. Yourresponses are anonymous and confidential ; they will be reported only inaggregate form.
SPANKING & CORPORAL PUNISHMENT SURVEY- Corporal punishmentis the intentional infliction of pain on the body for the purpose ofpunishment.Examples include spanking,slapping,punching,hitting withobjects,pinching,and forcing to sand for long periods of time .
1. AGE
under 21
21-2425-40
41-54
55 and over
2.Classification
Freshman
Sophomore
Junior
Seniorgraduate Student
Vt School
3.Gender
Male Female
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
25/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 25
4.Do you think its okay to spank children as a means of discipline ?
No,not under any circumstances
Yes ,under what circumstances ?
5.Did your parents spank you as a means of discipline ?
Yes
No
6.Should parents be allowed to use corporal punishment to disciplinetheir children?
Yes
No
7.Does corporal punishment work better then other disciplinarymethods that don't involve physical pain?
Yes
No
8.Have you ever been in trouble with the police ?
Yes
No
9. Overall, do you think that you deserved the punishment that yourparents/guardians used on you when you were a child?
Yes
No
10.How likely do you think you will spank your children as a means of
dicipline?with 1 being very unlikely and 5 being very likely
1 2 3 4 5
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
26/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 26
Questionnaireapproval
o.k. donald check your responses
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:05 AM, wrote:
CodeBookFile
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Dispk LikelySpk PrntSpk UseCorp CorpBett
BY Age Class Gender
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL
/BARCHART.
Syntaxfile
FREQUENCIESVARIABLES=AgeClassGenderDispkLikelySpkPrntSpkUseCorp
CorpBettPoliproDespuni
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
DATASETACTIVATEDataSet1.
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=DispkLikelySpkPrntSpkUseCorpCorpBettBYAgeClassGender
/FORMAT=NOTABLES
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
27/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 27
/STATISTICS=CHISQGAMMA
/COUNTROUNDCELL
/BARCHART.
*ChartBuilder.
GGRAPH
/GRAPHDATASETNAME="graphdataset"VARIABLES=Age
COUNT()[name="COUNT"]MISSING=LISTWISE
REPORTMISSING=NO
/GRAPHSPECSOURCE=INLINE.
BEGINGPL
SOURCE:s=userSource(id("graphdataset"))
DATA:Age=col(source(s),name("Age"),unit.category())
DATA:COUNT=col(source(s),name("COUNT"))
COORD:polar.theta(startAngle(0))
GUIDE:axis(dim(1),null())
GUIDE:legend(aesthetic(aesthetic.color.interior),label("Age"))
SCALE:linear(dim(1),dataMinimum(),dataMaximum())
SCALE:cat(aesthetic(aesthetic.color.interior),include("1","2","3","4"))
ELEMENT:interval.stack(position(summary.percent(summary.percent(COUNT,
base.all(acrossPanels())))),color.interior(Age))
ENDGPL.
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
28/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 28
SPSSPrintOuts
Dispk * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age
1 2 3 4 Total
1 16 30 5 0 51Dispk
2 15 31 9 2 57
Total 31 61 14 2 108
LikelySpk * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age
1 2 3 4 Total
1 1 2 0 0 3
2 7 12 6 0 25
3 12 16 2 1 314 10 23 4 0 37
LikelySpk
5 1 9 2 1 13
Total 31 62 14 2 109
LikelySpk * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age
1 2 3 4 Total
1 1 2 0 0 3
2 7 12 6 0 25
3 12 16 2 1 31
4 10 23 4 0 37
LikelySpk
5 1 9 2 1 13
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
29/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 29
LikelySpk * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age
1 2 3 4Total
1 1 2 0 0 3
2 7 12 6 0 25
3 12 16 2 1 31
4 10 23 4 0 37
LikelySpk
5 1 9 2 1 13
Total 31 62 14 2 109
UseCorp * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age
1 2 3 4 Total
1 17 39 9 1 66UseCorp
2 14 24 5 1 44
Total 31 63 14 2 110
CorpBett * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age
1 2 3 4 Total
1 18 26 7 2 53CorpBett
2 13 34 7 0 54
Total 31 60 14 2 107
Count
Gender
1 2 Total
UseCorp 1 32 34 66
2 15 29 44
Total 47 63 110
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
30/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 30
Dispk * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age1 2 3 4 Total
1 16 30 5 0 51Dispk
2 15 31 9 2 57
Total 31 61 14 2 108
LikelySpk * Class Crosstabulation
Count
Class1 2 3 4 5 6 Total
1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
2 4 11 4 1 2 3 25
3 5 12 6 4 2 2 31
4 4 17 3 10 2 1 37
LikelySpk
5 1 3 2 5 1 1 13
Total 15 45 15 20 7 7 109
PrntSpk * Age Crosstabulation
Count
Age
1 2 3 4 Total
1 24 41 8 1 74PrntSpk
2 7 22 6 1 36
Total 31 63 14 2 110
CorpBett * Gender Crosstabulation
Count
Gender
1 2 Total
8/8/2019 Spanking Project 1
31/31
SurveyResearchReport1. 31
1 19 34 53CorpBett
2 28 26 54
Total 47 60 107