Upload
mariela-heldreth
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Space Weather dependence of the air drag as observed by CHAMP
Hermann Lühr 1) and Huixin Liu2)
1) GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany2) Dept. Earth and Planetary Science, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan
2nd European Space Weather Week, ESWW 2005ESTEC, 14 – 18 Nov. 2005
For satellites in low-Earth orbit air drag is generally the most important disturbance force determining lifetime, fuel consumption and predictability of ephemeris.
Current atmospheric models are not capable of predicting the dynamics of the thermosphere adequately. This is, in particular, true during magnetically disturbed periods.
Recent satellite missions, such as CHAMP, carrying sensitive accelerometers provide detailed observations and offer the possibility to study the relevant forcing mechanisms.
Motivation
CHAMP Payload Instruments
Prölss (2001) Physik des erdnahen Weltraums
Global Density and Wind Distribution at 300 km Altitude
vVACm
a effd 2
2
1
m=520 km, Cd=2.2, V2=Vs2+Vc2
sincos yxeff AAA
Deriving the Thermospheric Density from the Accelerometer
Average Thermospheric Density at 400 km
(10^-12 kg m^-3)
Liu et al., 2005
Mid-latitude density enhancement
Density, 2003
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
1080 1100 1120 1140 1160 1180 1200 1220 1240 1260 1280 1300 1320 1340 1360 1380 1400 1420 1440 1460
MJD
Air
den
sity
density, asc
density
Low latitude density variation, 2003
Propagation of the Density Disturbance
Thermospheric density vs. time (unit:10s) during three orbits on Oct. 29, 2003.
Thermospheric Density During magn. Storm
Liu and Lühr, 2005
Response of Thermospheric Density:Change over quiet day
• ρ experienced large disturbance,• ρ↑at high latitudes first, then propagated to lower latitudes. • It recovered quickly within 12 h after the storm main phase,• It reached pre-storm condition within 26 h after Dst minimum.
Thermospheric density variation. Time starting at 00 UT on Nov. 20, 2003.
Density features at high latitude
At auroral latitudes distinct features of enhanced density are present.
• On the dayside, cusp region: density peak shows little dependence on magnetic activity.
• On the nightside, pre-midnight: density enhancement depends on substorm activity.
Percentage difference in polar regions Liu et al., 2005
Air Drag Spikes in Cusp Region
Lühr et al., 2004
Density and Currents
Heating and Up-welling
Deriving the Thermospheric Winds from the Accelerometer
Underlaying concept:
The acceleration vector is parallel to the relative velocity of the air
x
y
x
y
a
a
xx
yy a
a
skmx /6.7tsmeasuremenaa yx :,
Zonal wind:
cos/490 smu yy
latitudegeogr.:
at polar regions special considerations are required.
Zonal Winds at Equator
Liu et al. (2005)
• A super rotation of the upper atmosphere was deduced from satellite orbit inclination changes (King-Hele, 1964).
• There has been a long debate about the driver for this net motion of the air.
• A very promising candidate mechanism is the low-latitude F-region dynamo proposed by Rishbeth (1971).
Super Rotation of the Atmosphere
Equatorial eastward windjet at night
[m/s]
Conclusions
The CHAMP satellite has provided for the first time insight into the full spatial and temporal variability of thermospheric density and winds.
Space weather related modifications of the thermospheric density is not well predicted by models like MSIS. This is in particular true for effects driven by currents and plasma interaction.
Upper atmospheric winds are even less understood. They play a key role in the interaction between charged and neutral particles. For a low drag spacecraft like GOCE they are an important factor in the disturbance balance.
For signification progress in predictability of air drag conditions it is required that thermodynamic and electrodynamic effects are considered at the same time. A mission like Swarm has the ability to provide the required information on a near-realtime basis.
Winds across the pole, Summer 2003
Vx: sunward
Vy: dawnward
Thermospheric Density During magn. Storm
Liu and Lühr, 2005
Responses at Different Latitudes