Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Terence CreamerDr Tobias Bischof-Niemz
South Africa’s Energy TransitionA Roadmap to a Low-cost,
Decarbonised and Job-rich Future
Offical book launch, Wits Business School, Johannesburg
21 August 2018
2
What we want you to take away from the book
A power-system in South Africa that is based on renewables is
• Cheaper than all alternatives
• Cleaner than all alternatives
• Creates more jobs and localisation potential
It helps re-industrialising the country on the back of a low-cost, low-carbon electricity platform
Visit the book‘s website at
http://saenergytransition.net
3
Agenda
Global Context
South Africa’s Unique Renewables Opportunity
• Cheap: renewables are least cost
• Clean: decarbonising at least cost
• Job rich: renewables more job-intensive
New Export Opportunities Arising from Cheap Renewables
Summary
4
7
2000 20172003
9
2001
7
2002 2009
271
56
18
2016
8
30
20132004 2007
112
2005
215
20082006
31320
2015
7
39
17
39
38
2010
5441
7
98
2011
31
57
45
2012
35
40
519
70
Total South Africanpower system(approx. 45 GW)
2014
4 817
2233
63
56
71 76 73
91
120 124
154
46
Solar PV
Wind
Global annual new capacity in GW/a
Subsidies Cost competitive
>150 GW of new solar PV and wind added to the grid in 2017 globally
5
2005
4%
23%
39%
Structure of Global Electricity Generation
in TWh/a and %
10%
8%
2000
18%
2015
2%
2010 2017
15 550
18 396
21 572
24 324
16%
25 570
4%
4%
39%
17%
17%
2%
15%
40%
16%
20%
6%
7%
16%
13%
40%
22%
5%
38%
16%
11%
23%
9%
Coal
Renewables(non-hydro)
Hydro
Oil
Gas
Nuclear
Renewables share in global electricity generation increased to 9%
Source: IEA, IEA GECO2017
6
Agenda
Global Context
South Africa’s Unique Renewables Opportunity
• Cheap: renewables are least cost
• Clean: decarbonising at least cost
• Job rich: renewables more job-intensive
New Export Opportunities Arising from Cheap Renewables
Summary
7
Significant reductions in actual tariffs …
REIPPPP results: new wind/solar PV 60-80% cheaper than first projectsResults of Department of Energy’s RE IPP Procurement Programme (REIPPPP) and Coal IPP Proc. Programme
3.65
1.170.87
0.62
1.511.19
0.870.69 0.62
0
1
2
3
4
5
Nov 2011
2.18
Aug 2013
Mar 2012
Aug 2014
Nov 2015
-59%
-83%
Wind
Solar PV
Sources: http://www.energy.gov.za/files/renewable-energy-status-report/Market-Overview-and-Current-Levels-of-Renewable-Energy-Deployment-NERSA.pdf; StatsSA on CPI; http://www.saippa.org.za/Portals/24/Documents/2016/Coal%20IPP%20factsheet.pdf; http://www.ee.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/New_Power_Generators_RSA-CSIR-14Oct2016.pdf;
Actual average tariffsin R/kWh (Apr-2016 prices)
8
Significant reductions in actual tariffs from the RE IPP Procurement Programme (REIPPPP) …
Actual tariffs: new wind/solar PV 40% cheaper than new coal in RSAResults of Department of Energy’s RE IPP Procurement Programme (REIPPPP) and Coal IPP Proc. Programme
3.65
1.170.87
0.62
1.511.19
0.870.69 0.62
0
1
2
3
4
5
Nov 2011
Aug 2014
2.18
Mar 2012
Nov 2015
Aug 2013
-59%
-83%
Wind
Solar PV
0.62 0.62
1.03
Wind IPPSolar PV IPP Baseload Coal IPP
-40%
… have made new solar PV & wind power 40% cheaper than new coal in South Africa today
Actual average tariffsin R/kWh (Apr-2016 prices)
Actual average tariffsin R/kWh (Apr-2016 prices)
Sources: http://www.energy.gov.za/files/renewable-energy-status-report/Market-Overview-and-Current-Levels-of-Renewable-Energy-Deployment-NERSA.pdf; StatsSA on CPI; http://www.saippa.org.za/Portals/24/Documents/2016/Coal%20IPP%20factsheet.pdf; http://www.ee.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/New_Power_Generators_RSA-CSIR-14Oct2016.pdf;
9
Very high solar irradiation in South Africa is a competitive advantage
Yearly total of global irradiation on horizontal surface
Average for Germany
Average for South Africa
Solar irradiation in South Africa ...... as compared to Germany, where solar PV is now
close to cost competitiveness with new coal and gas
Source: Joint Research Center of the European Commission, PVGIS, BCG analysis
10
South Africa has wide areas with > 6 m/s average wind speed @ 100 mAverage wind speed at 100 meter above ground for the years from 2009-2013 for South Africa and Germany
Sources: Wind and Solar Aggregation Study, Fraunhofer and CSIR, in partnership with Eskom and SANEDI
Wind resource in South Africa ... ... as compared to Germany
11
South Africa: sufficient land for very large wind and solar deployment
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
Johannesburg
Cape Town
Durban
Upington
Port Elizabeth
Bloemfontein
Polokwane
Johannesburg
Cape Town
Durban
Upington
Port Elizabeth
Bloemfontein
Polokwane
Longitude
Latitu
de
EIA: Onshore Wind
EIA: Solar PV
REDZ
All EIAs
(status early 2016)
Wind: 90 GW
Solar PV: 330 GW
All REDZ
(phase 1)
Wind: 535 GW
Solar PV: 1 782 GW
Sources: https://www.csir.co.za/sites/default/files/Documents/Wind_and_PV_Aggregation_study_final_presentation_REV1.pdf;
https://www.csir.co.za/sites/default/files/Documents/Wind%20and%20Solar%20PV%20Resource%20Aggregation%20Study%20for%20South%20Africa_Final%20report.pdf
12
Wind
Unit cost in R/kWhand cost structure(April 2016 prices)
Solar PV Coal CCGT (Gas)Nuclear
Fuel (and variable O&M)
Fixed O&M
Investment
0.62 0.62
1.031.09
1.15
82%Assumed utilization(capacity factor) 50%90%23% 40%
Of all available technologies for bulk electricity generation, solar PV & wind are now the cheapest new-build options in South Africa, by far
IRP assumptionsActual tariffs
But what about the variability of solar PV and wind?
13
Greenfield Power-system Planning
14
Thought experiment: Build a new power system from scratch
Base load: 8 GW
Annual: 70 TWh/a (~30% of today’s South African demand)
Questions
• Technical: Can a wind & solar PV blend, mixed with flexible dispatchable power to fill gaps supply this?
• Economical: If yes, at what cost?
Assumptions/approach
• 19 GW wind @ 62 c/kWh (average tariff in South Africa’s latest auction from Nov 2015, 2016 prices)
• 7 GW solar PV @ 62 c/kWh (average tariff in South Africa’s latest auction from Nov 2015, 2016 prices)
• 8 GW flexible power generator to fill the gaps @ 1 000 R/kW/a and 150 R/GJ (e.g. high-priced LNG, leads to 135 c/kWh if burned in gas turbines or gas engines with 40% electrical efficiency)
• 15-minute solar PV and wind data from CSIR resource study, covering the entire country (https://www.csir.co.za/csir-energy-centre-documents)
• 15-minute simulation of supply structure for three consecutive years (2010-2012)
Sources: IRP; REIPPPP outcomes
1
2
3
15
Thought experiment: assumed 8 GW of true baseload (constant load)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
24h00
Hour of the day
GW
6h00 12h00 18h00
System Load
Sources: CSIR analysis
16
A mix of solar PV, wind and flexible power can supply this baseload demand in the same reliable manner as a base-power generator
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
12h00
Hour of the day
24h006h00
GW
0h00 18h00
Useful Wind
Residual Load (flexible power)
Excess Solar PV/Wind
Useful Solar PVExcess solar PV/wind energy curtailment
assumed (no value)
Sources: CSIR analysis
Residual load supply options: gas, biogas,
(pumped) hydro, CSP…
7 GW
19 GW
8 GW1
2
3
@ 62 c/kWh
@ 2.1 R/kWh
@ 62 c/kWh @ 1000 R/kW/a
Fuel @ 135 c/kWh
17
On the lowest-wind day the residual load is largeSimulated wind and solar PV power output for a 19 GW wind and 7 GW solar PV fleet on 21 July 2011
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Hour of the day
GW
0h00 6h00 24h0018h0012h00
Excess Solar PV/Wind
Useful Wind
Residual Load (flexible power)
Useful Solar PV
Sources: CSIR analysis
7 GW
19 GW1
2
8 GW
3
18
On the lowest-solar-PV day the wind fleet still contributes a lotSimulated wind and solar PV power output for a 19 GW wind and 7 GW solar PV fleet on 21 June 2012
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
12h00 24h00
Hour of the day
0h00
GW
6h00 18h00
Excess Solar PV/Wind
Useful Solar PV
Residual Load (flexible power)
Useful Wind
Sources: CSIR analysis
7 GW19 GW1 2
8 GW
3
19
On a high-wind and solar day the amount of excess energy is largeSimulated wind and solar PV power output for a 19 GW wind and 7 GW solar PV fleet on 30 October 2012
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Hour of the day
GW
0h00 12h006h00 24h0018h00
Useful Solar PV
Excess Solar PV/Wind
Residual Load (flexible power)
Useful Wind
Sources: CSIR analysis
7 GW19 GW
12
8 GW
3
20
In the least-windy week, fuel for flexible generator must be stockedSimulated 15-minute solar PV and wind power supply for the week from 18-24 July 2011
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Wednesday
Day of the week
Friday
GW
Monday Tuesday Thursday Saturday Sunday
Excess Solar PV/Wind
Residual Load (flexible power)
Useful Wind
Useful Solar PV
Sources: CSIR analysis
7 GW
19 GW1 2
8 GW
3
21
Technical feasibility in two key dimensions
Ramping
• Maximum 15-minute ramp of residual load from 2010 to 2012: 1.2 GW/(15-min) 15% of installed flexible capacity of 8 GW per 15-min
• Minimum 15-minute ramp of residual load from 2010 to 2012: -1.2 GW/(15-min) -15% of installed flexible capacity of 8 GW per 15-min
Open-Cycle Gas Turbines can ramp up or down with 5-10% output change per minute
(Pumped) hydro plants can ramp up and down even faster
Plus, a down-ramp of the residual load can always be catered for by short curtailment of wind/PV
Fuel-storage
• The flexible power generator of 8 GW installed capacity requires a fuel-storage capacity of 11 days
Eskom currently stocks coal at power stations for more than 50 days on average
Buffer capacity of a LNG landing terminal is 4-6 weeks at the minimum
22
On average, solar PV and wind would supply 89% of the total demandAverage 15-minute solar PV and wind power supply calculated from simulation for 3 years from 2010-2012
Sources: CSIR analysis
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
18h006h00 12h00
GW
0h00 24h00
Hour of the day
Average Excess Solar PV/Wind
Average Useful Wind
Average Residual Load (flexible power)
Average Useful Solar PV
Average System Load
7 GW19 GW
12
8 GW
3
8 GW flexible power generator runs at annual average
capacity factor of 11%
23
Mix of solar PV, wind and expensive flexible power costs 93 c/kWh at the maximum – 10 c/kWh cheaper than new-build baseload coal
2
TWh/a
System Load
11
Solar PV
11(15%)
52(74%)
Wind
8(11%)
Residual Load
(flexible power)
70 13 62
Useful Wind
Excess Solar PV/Wind
Useful Solar PV
13 TWh/a x 62 c/kWh+ 62 TWh/a x 62 c/kWh
+ 8 TWh/a x 135 c/kWh+ 8 GW x 1 000 R/kW/a
_______________________
70 TWh/a
24
Mix of solar PV, wind and expensive flexible power costs 93 c/kWh at the maximum – 10 c/kWh cheaper than new-build baseload coal
2
TWh/a
System Load
11
Solar PV
11(15%)
52(74%)
Wind
8(11%)
Residual Load
(flexible power)
70 13 62
Useful Wind
Excess Solar PV/Wind
Useful Solar PV
Solar PV: R8.1 billion/aWind: + R38.4 billion/aFuel: + R10.8 billion/aCapacity: + R8.0 billion/a_______________________
70 TWh/a
Pessimistic assumptions• No economic value attached to 13 TWh/a
of excess energy (bought and “thrown away”)• Solar PV/wind costs from November 2015
(no further cost reduction assumed)• Very high fuel cost for flexible power generator
of 150 R/GJ = 135 c/kWh assumed
New-build baseload coal / nuclear:
103 / 109 c/kWh
= 93 c/kWhApril-2016 prices
25
Brownfield Power-system Planning: IRP
26
10
0
20
30
40
20302024 20382020 2034
Operational coal-fired capacity in GW
2016 2018 2022 2028 2032 2036 2040 2042 2044 2046 2048 20502026
South Africa has scheduled to decommission 28 GW of coal by 2040
Sources: Eskom, IRP
Camden
Komati
Hendrina
Grootvlei
Arnot
Kriel
Medupi
Matla
Duvha
Kendal
Tutuka
MajubaDry
Lethabo
Matimba
MajubaWet
Kusile
Scheduled decommissioning until…
… 2030: -13 GW … 2040: -28 GW … 2050: -35 GW
27
50
0
100
150
200
350
250
300
400
265
204
382
321
2040 2050
307
352
241242
225
187
2030
77
49
15
13
14
20202016
Electricityin TWh/a
13
79
Supply Gap
Wind
Gas
Solar PV
CSP
Nuclear
Hydro
Peaking
Coal
An Integrated Resources Planmodel fills the supply gap in theleast-cost manner, subject toany constraints imposed
Existing and committed power generators in South Africa (2016)
Electricity demand
Demand grows, existing fleet phases out: gap needs to be filled
Sources: CSIR
28
400
100
450
-100
-50
200
300
350
0
50
150
250
204
2020 2040
10535
2016
Total electricityproduced in TWh/a
79
53
417
-30
187
2030 2050
137
-57
139
179
49
243273
323
379
Battery Storage
Pumped Storage
Curtailed wind/PV
CoalSolar PV
Wind
Hydro
Peaking
Gas
Nuclear
CSIR Least Cost 2017ENERGY
CSIR Least Cost 2017CAPACITY
Renewables = 85%Wind/PV = 82%… of primary electricity(388 TWh in 2050)
150
50
100
200
0
250
216
37
2020
92
Total installed capacity in GW
2016 2050
8
20
188
30
2030
18
133
61
2040
57
15
165
173
827
82
7550
58
1) No new nuclear2) No new coal
Least Cost expansion path: 85% renewables energy share by 2050
Sources: CSIR
29
Several studies independently come to the same conclusion
University ofCape Town
Meridian Economics
NRELCSIR
University of Frankfurt
Common thread: No new coal, no new nuclear
Eskom
Link
Link, Link, Link
Link, Link
Link
Link
Link
30
Agenda
Global Context
South Africa’s Unique Renewables Opportunity
• Cheap: renewables are least cost
• Clean: decarbonising at least cost
• Job rich: renewables more job-intensive
New Export Opportunities Arising from Cheap Renewables
Summary
31
CSIR Least Cost 2017CO2 Emissions
CSIR Least Cost 2017Water Usage
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
150
200
0
50
100
250
300
Electricity sector CO2 emissionsin Mt/a
-74%
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 20500
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Electricity sector water usagein billion litres/a
-97%
South Africa’s commitment
Least CostLeast Cost
Least Cost: Both CO2 emissions and water usage go down dramatically
Sources: CSIR
32
Agenda
Global Context
South Africa’s Unique Renewables Opportunity
• Cheap: renewables are least cost
• Clean: decarbonising at least cost
• Job rich: renewables more job-intensive
New Export Opportunities Arising from Cheap Renewables
Summary
33
Power Plant / Coal Mine Construction
Direct job-years
Supplier job-years
Inputs Economic Activity Output
New power station (new GW installed)
Power Plant / Coal MineOperation
Direct job-years
Supplier job-years
Inputs Economic Activity Output
Electricity (TWh produced)
Capex-related
Jobs
Opex-related
Jobs
Jobs related to power generation
34
6 401
36 992
413
28 182
8 724
6 000
12 373
4 9004 500
5 350
497
2 8004 917
200
2 500
1 300
900
3 400
PermanentDirect and
Supplier Jobs
Opex-relatedCapex-related
12 450
Capex-relatedOpex-related
15 782
TOTALCoal
TOTALSolar PV/Wind
24 542
12 400
+31%
Supplier Coal power station
Direct
Solar PV
Wind Coal mine
Solar PV: 1 GW/a 25 GW50 TWh/a
Wind: 1 GW/a 20 GW50 TWh/a
2 GW/a 100 TWh/a
Coal: 0.5 GW/a 14 GW100 TWh/a
0.5 GW/a 100 TWh/a
An energy-equivalent fleet of solar PV and wind produces 30% morejobs than a coal fleet – without the jobs in the firm capacity (gas)
Sources: Based on data from Department of Energy in context of IEP, http://www.energy.gov.za/files/IEP/2016/IEP-AnnexureB-Macroeconomic-Assumptions.pdf, pages 23 onwards
35
Agenda
Global Context
South Africa’s Unique Renewables Opportunity
• Cheap: renewables are least cost
• Clean: decarbonising at least cost
• Job rich: renewables more job-intensive
New Export Opportunities Arising from Cheap Renewables
Summary
36
Inputs Conversion Power FuelsFuel Production
ElectricityH2 Hydrogen (H2)
Water
Air (N2 and O2) N2
Air Separation
Plant
Electrolyser
CO2
Hydrocarbons• Methane (CH4)• Methanol (CH3OH)• Diesel/Petrol/
Kerosene (CnHm)
Syngas (H2, CO)Existing CO2 streamsBiogas (CH4 and CO2)
Fischer-Tropsch Reactor
Reverse Water-Gas
Shift Reactor
Ammonia (NH3)Haber-Bosch
Reactor
H2O
H2
H2
South Africa exhibits key ingredients for cost-competitive power fuels
37
Electricity-based fuels and chemicals (“power fuels”, “e-fuels”) provide a huge potential export opportunity for South Africa
South African renewable electricity will always be cheaper than in most other countries in the world
• Combined solar, wind and land resources better than in most other parts of the world
• Cheapest renewable electricity is a competitive advantage that will never go away
In addition, South Africa has vast experience in the creation of synthetic liquid fuels
• The country gets roughly 1/3 of its liquid fuel demand from Coal-to-Liquid
• Sasol is one of the largest Coal-to-Liquid producers globally
This combination provides a huge opportunity for South Africa to commercialise renewable-electricity-based, carbon-neutral synthetic fuels and chemicals from Power-to-Liquid/-Gas processes
The EU has started to create the market for such fuels via its mandatory biofuels blending requirements
• Aviation fuel demand alone: 60 billion litres/a
Global initiative started to connect off-takers with suppliers
38
PrimaryEnergy
Intermediary Energy Carrier
End UseConversion
E
T
H
Today: South Africa‘s energy flows are domestic coal and imported oil
39
PrimaryEnergy
End UseMultiple Conversion Steps on the Basis of Electricity and Hydrogen
E
T
H
Domestic Coal: 54 PJ
Imported Oil: 134 PJ
Domestic Wind: 1 270 PJ
Domestic Solar: 1 270 PJ
Natural Gas: 200 PJ
Domestic Biomass: 761 PJ(today + biogenic municipal waste)
Domestic Ambient Heat: 251 PJ Heat Pumps: 376 PJ
Biomass Boilers & Fireplaces: 661 PJ
Resistive Boilers & Heaters: 376 PJ
Seawater Desalination Plants: 126 PJ Fresh Water: 10 trillion litres
Power Plants: 2 840 PJ(120 GW wind, 180 GW solar PV, others)
Electricity: 2 680 PJ(~740 TWh)
Electrolysers: 1 314 PJ(~70 GW)
Hydrogen: 1 052 PJ(~7.4 million tonnes)
Liquefaction Plants: 336 PJ
Fertiliser Plants: 140 PJ
Hydrocarbons: 440 PJ
Chemicals: 188 PJExport PtL: 188 PJ (~5 billion litres)Export Fertiliser: 140 PJ (~3 million tonnes)
Airplanes: 72 PJ End-use Transport: 238 PJ
Losses: 953 PJ
End-use Electricity: 481 PJ
End-use Heat: 1 634 PJ
FCEVs: 183 PJ
BEVs: 138 PJ
Steel Furnaces: 200 PJ
Boilers: 193 PJ
Future: South Africa‘s energy flows based on solar, wind & hydrogen?
Export of power fuels: R50-60 billion/a; fertilizer/ammonia: R20-30 billion/a; 10 trillion litres/a fresh-water production
40
Agenda
Global Context
South Africa’s Unique Renewables Opportunity
• Cheap: renewables are least cost
• Clean: decarbonising at least cost
• Job rich: renewables more job-intensive
New Export Opportunities Arising from Cheap Renewables
Summary
41
Summary: South Africa has a unique opportunity to re-position its energy system
It is cost-optimal to aim for 85% renewable electricity share by 2050
• Solar PV, wind and flexible power generators (e.g. gas, CSP, hydro, biogas, demand response, batteries, fuel cells) are the cheapest new-build mix for the South African power system
• From a pure cost perspective no new coal, no new nuclear, a deviation from that would be a subsidy
Proposed next steps
• Strategic direction: give a clear commitment to a new-build mix of solar PV, wind and flexibility (IRP)
• Implementation:
– Introduce a spatial component into the implementation to ensure new power generators are closer to where existing power generators will phase out, take over jobs from coal to renewables
– Separate Eskom generation from Eskom grid in order for Eskom grid to be able to facilitate the transition better
– “Sweat” Eskom’s coal fleet and gradually ramp it down while ensuring re-training of staff and deployment in RE
– Open up generation and retail electricity business for competition, keep control over infrastructure assets (grid)
– Create 2-3 national champions on the renewables generation side
• Export preparation: engage globally on export potential for renewable-electricity-based products
42
Thank you
Re a leboga
SiyathokozaEnkosi
Siyabonga
Re a leboha
Ro livhuha
Ha Khensa
Dankie
Note: „Thank you“ in all official languages of the Republic of South Africa