21
Sound Quality & Jury Testing Realize innovation. Restricted © Siemens AG 2018

Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Sound Quality & Jury TestingRealize innovation.Restricted © Siemens AG 2018

Page 2: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 2 Siemens PLM Software

Page 3: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 3 Siemens PLM Software

What is sound quality?

Deliver products that fit your desired brand sound

Keep what makes it sound good

Remove what makes it sound bad

Page 4: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 4 Siemens PLM Software

The sound quality process

Sound recording

Objective qualification:

Sound qualitymetrics

Subjective qualification:

Jury Testing

Audio replay& filtering

Classical analysis2500.000.00 Hz

microfoon (CH1)

70.00

10.00

dB

Pa2/H

z

2500.000.00 Hzmicrofoon (CH1)

5374.14

244.22

rpmT1

110.00

10.00dB

Pa2/H

z

Page 5: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 5 Siemens PLM Software

The sound quality process

Sound recording Sound qualitymetrics

Jury TestingClassical analysis2500.000.00 Hz

microfoon (CH1)

70.00

10.00

dB

Pa2/H

z

2500.000.00 Hzmicrofoon (CH1)

5374.14

244.22

rpmT1

110.00

10.00dB

Pa2/H

z

Page 6: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 6 Siemens PLM Software

Binaural measurement systems

G.R.A.S. 45BB KEMAR Head and Torso

LMS SCADAS XS with LMS SCADAS 3D Binaural Headset

Binaural measurements• Stereo recording just like human hearing • Ideal for replay• Requires artificial head or a binaural headset• Can be used for direct replay• Recorded data is automatically equalized for

analysis

Equalization for analysis• The effect of head and torso is removed from the

recording• The measured signal “looks” as if measured by a

microphone

Page 7: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 7 Siemens PLM Software

The sound quality process

Sound recording Sound qualitymetrics

Jury TestingClassical analysis2500.000.00 Hz

microfoon (CH1)

70.00

10.00

dB

Pa2/H

z

2500.000.00 Hzmicrofoon (CH1)

5374.14

244.22

rpmT1

110.00

10.00dB

Pa2/H

z

Page 9: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 9 Siemens PLM Software

Why can’t we just look at microphone data?Inner ear masking effect

Frequency masking =Inability to hear tones with close frequency spacing

Sound frequencies trigger inner ear fluid resonance in specific locations along the cochlea

Fluid motion triggers hair cell nerve response

Fluid motion is saturated by dominant frequencies

Temporal masking =Inability to hear tones with close temporal spacing

Masking is the basis for MP3 sound compression!

Page 10: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 10 Siemens PLM Software

The sound quality process

Sound recording Sound qualitymetrics

Jury TestingClassical analysis2500.000.00 Hz

microfoon (CH1)

70.00

10.00

dB

Pa2/H

z

2500.000.00 Hzmicrofoon (CH1)

5374.14

244.22

rpmT1

110.00

10.00dB

Pa2/H

z

Page 11: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 11 Siemens PLM Software

Which door slam sounds the best?

LoudnessSharpnessSpeech

Articulation IndexNoise RatingSpeech Inference Level

ModulationRoughnessFluctuation StrengthHilbert Transform

TonalityTone-to-noiseTonalityProminence ratio

ImpulsivenessKurtosisWavelets

Sound quality metricsObjectively quantifying subjective experience

Page 12: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 12 Siemens PLM Software

24000.00

0.00

Hz

19.000.00 sTime

90.00

-10.00

dB(A

)Pa

83.98AutoPow er sound - Left (A) WF 38 [0-18.5 s]

20.000.00 sTime

29.00

0.00

Ampl

itude

sone

1.00

0.00

Ampl

itude

F Loudness Zw icker sound - Left S[0.00-20.00 s] L

20.000.00 s

1.30

-1.30

Rea

lPa

1.00

0.00

Ampl

itude

31:sound - Left (only reduced values available)

Sound Pressure Level

Quantifies sound energy heard by the listener

Only takes into account frequency sensitivity ofhuman ear

Loudness metrics

Quantifies perceived loudness

Accounts for frequency sensitivity and masking effects of human ear

Some energy is lost!

Sound quality metricsLoudness example

Different sounds, same loudness

Page 13: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Demo

Page 14: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 16 Siemens PLM Software

The sound quality process

Sound recording Sound qualitymetrics

Jury TestingClassical analysis2500.000.00 Hz

microfoon (CH1)

70.00

10.00

dB

Pa2/H

z

2500.000.00 Hzmicrofoon (CH1)

5374.14

244.22

rpmT1

110.00

10.00dB

Pa2/H

z

Page 15: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 17 Siemens PLM Software

What is Jury Testing?

Gather subjective opinions on your product

Evaluate complex sound performance

Benchmark against competition

Check consistency and statisticsSUBJECTIVE ANALYSIS

Understand the expectations of your

customers and design the product that exceeds them

Page 16: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 19 Siemens PLM Software

Which question should I ask?A-B comparison

Juror selects preference between two sequential sounds

Goal:

Relative comparison between products

Applications:

Benchmarking against competition Ranking of design variants Ordering of sound pairs

Page 17: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 20 Siemens PLM Software

Which question should I ask?Category judgement

Juror rates sound quality on a scale related to a singledescriptor (e.g. ‘sporty’ or ‘robust’)

Goal:

Break-down the sound into impressions and feelings of thejurors

Applications:

Standalone evaluation of product sound quality In-depth benchmarking against competition In-depth ranking of design variants

Page 18: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 21 Siemens PLM Software

Which question should I ask?Semantic differential

Juror rates sound quality on scale between two opposingadjectives (e.g. ‘cheap’ vs. ‘expensive’)

Goal:

Break-down the sound into impressions and feelings ofthe jurors

Applications:

Standalone evaluation of product sound quality In-depth benchmarking against competition In-depth ranking of design variants

Page 19: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 22 Siemens PLM Software

Analyzing jury test results

Display of concordance vs. consistency. All Jurors are mapped on this X-Y graph to easily check the quality of their answers. The colors represent the answer to the question from the pie-chart.

Set of filters to be applied on the list of Jurors. The available criteria are: concordance, consistency, reference questions, statistical questions.

Pie-chart showing the percentage distribution of answers provided by Jurors. Use the drop-down to change the statistical question.

Column chart showing which sounds were preferred most. As the poor-quality results will be filtered out, the overall result will adapt.

Page 20: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

Restricted © Siemens AG 2018Page 23 Siemens PLM Software

The sound quality process

Sound recording

Objective qualification:

Sound qualitymetrics

Subjective qualification:

Jury Testing

Audio replay& filtering

Classical analysis2500.000.00 Hz

microfoon (CH1)

70.00

10.00

dB

Pa2/H

z

2500.000.00 Hzmicrofoon (CH1)

5374.14

244.22

rpmT1

110.00

10.00dB

Pa2/H

z

Page 21: Sound Quality & Jury Testing · 2019-02-08 · The sound quality process Sound recording Objective qualification: Sound quality metrics Subjective qualification: Jury Testing Audio

www.siemens.plm/simcenterRealize innovation.Restricted © Siemens AG 2018