Upload
rainer-hirt
View
264
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Sound follows function. Sound communication and the relevance of timbre. Presentation at the 2nd International VDT Symposium (Kai Bronner & Rainer Hirt)
Citation preview
wew
Sound follows functionSound communication and the relevance of timbre.
Lecturer: Rainer Hirt & Kai Bronner (audio-branding.de)
wew
01 Acoustic signs and its functions02 Overview ongoing Functional-Timbre-Study (FTS)
wew
01 Acoustic signs and its functions02 Overview ongoing Functional-Timbre-Study (FTS)
wew
01 Acoustic signs and its functions
wew
A. Basics
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Signs?
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Signs!A sign is a stimulus pattern that has a meaning.
A sign stands for something else.
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Semiotics: Theory of signs
IndexAn „Index“ is defined by some sensory feature(something directly visible, audible, smellable, etc) that is connected to it.
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Semiotics: Theory of signs
IconAn icon is a pattern that physically resembles what it „stands for“.
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Semiotics: Theory of signs
SymbolSymbols are arbitrary and unmotivated, reliant on conventional usage to determine meaning.
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Acoustic signs?
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Acoustic signs!
Index Icon SymbolIndex becomes Icon
Symbol becomes Icon
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Applications of acoustic signs
Auditory Display Audification Auditory-User-Interface
Corporate SoundCultural
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Basic design-approaches of acoustic signs:
Auditory iconsAuditory symbolsAuditory symcons (Mixed)
wew
B. Empirical study
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Ambition & research questions
1. Appropriateness of Auditory icons/symbols and symcons for the transfer of information-functions:–> Advice–> Warning–> Emergency
2. Effects of the mixture of icon and symbol („auditory symcon“)
3. Advantages of acoustic signs for „public-user-interfaces“
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Analysis of a situation– Talks with manfactures and customers (Höft-Wessel, ICA, DB)
– Secondary literature
– Preliminary study (semantic field-analysis)
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Study objectTicket machine
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Study designStudy method: Descriptive study
Survey sample size : N=22 Age average: 35 yearsWomen/Men: 10/12
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Lab set-up> Lectern (Terminal-simulation)> Table-PC (Touchpad)> Headphone
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Stimuli
321
321
symboliciconic
symconic
Advice: „Ticket ready for collection“
Advice: „Money ready for collection “
Warning: „Timeout“
Emergency: Deterrence
Context-Soundscape (Trainstation)
321
321
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Evaluation methodsSemantic differential
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scaling
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scalingResponse time measurement
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scalingResponse time measurementParticipant observation
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scalingResponse time measurementParticipant observationAssociation analysis
wew
C. Results
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Ambition & research questions
1. Appropriateness of Auditory icons/symbols and symcons for the transfer of information-functions:–> Advice–> Warning–> Emergency
2. Effects of the mixture of icon and symbol („auditory symcon“)
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Ambition & research questions
Auditory Symbol Auditory Symcon
Advice
Warning
Emergency
Funtion(intention) partially transferred
Funtion(intention) transferred
Funtion(intention) not transferred or false interpretation
Auditory Icon
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Ambition & research questions
3. Advantages of acoustic signs for „public-user-interfaces“
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Ambition & research questions
3. Advantages of acoustic signs for „public-user-interfaces“
The meaning of function of acoustic signs is comprehended intuitively.
A. Basics B. Study C. Results
Further investigationsThe study reveals amongst others, that further investigation on the acoustical parameter „timbre“ is required.
In the literature there is nearly no advice for selecting timbre according an information-function.
Thus, an ongoing study that addresses the perception of timbre is topic of the further presentation.
wew
02 Timbre and function
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
A. Timbre: definition & propertiesB. Sound perceptionC. Study design
wew
A. Timbre: definition & properties
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Timbre – what? Definition
Definition (American Standards Association 1960) Timbre is that attribute of auditory sensation in terms of which a listener can judge that two sounds similarly presented and having the same loudness and pitch are dissimilar.
A B
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Timbre properties
Verbal descriptionsovertone constellation: bright, dark, mellow, hollow, purenoise content: raspy, breathy, hoarse attack: smooth, abrupt, sharp, gentle, easing
Relationspitch - frequencyloudness - amplitudetimbre - multiple interacting acoustic factors
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Timbre properties
H. Fletcher (1934)Experiments show that a simple one-to-one relationship does not exist betweenthe two sets { loudness, pitch, timbre } and { sound intensity, fundamental frequency and overtone structure }
sound intensity
fundamental frequency
overtone structure
loudness
pitch
timbre
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Timbre propertiesMore than one dimension: multidimensionality
Erickson (1975)Clearly timbre is a multidimensional stimulus: it cannot be correlated with any single physical dimension.
Plomp (1982)Sounds cannot be ordered on a single scale with respect to timbre. Timbre is a multidimensional attribute of the perception of sounds.
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Multi-Dimensionality-Scaling MDSMDS studies reveal perceptual dimensions correlated with acoustic parameters corresponding to spectral, temporal and spectrotemporal properties of the sound events.
– experiments with paired sound stimuli– rating of similarity– axes corresponding to timbre‘s main perceptual dimensions –> timbre space
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
DimensionsDimension I = brightness Low brightness : french horn and cello
High brightness : oboe, muted trombone
Dimension II = spectral fluxHigh synchronicity and low fluctuation :
clarinet, saxophone
Low synchronicity and high fluctuation :
flute, violoncello
Dimension III = attack quality More transients : strings, flute
Fewer transients : brass, bassoon
Dimension I
Dimension IIIDimension II
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Timbre dimensions and related parametersAcross studies, several acoustic/physical parameters corresponding to timbre dimensions were found:
– Spectral centroid
– Spectral deviation
– Spectral density
– Attack time
– Decay time
–Amplitude envelope
– Spectral flux
– Pitch strength
– Attack synchronity
– Attack centroid
– Noisiness
...
wew
B. Sound perception
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Timbre and psychoacoustic properties Interview Dr. Gerhard Thoma, chief sounddesigner BMW:(http://www.goethe.de/ges/wrt/dos/aut/sou/de2169434.htm , 10/2007)
(...) There are sets of regression equations that help calculating/predicting a desired sound perception, for example a sporty sound:
a x sharpness + b x roughness + c x fluctuation strength, … = sportiness.!!
About 80 % of people will evaluate the sound in terms of sportiness.But:„acid test“in driving situation (context) = proof of validity!(...)
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Psychoacoustic properties and cognitive/affective evaluation – simple psychoacoustic parameters only refer to fixed relations of perception and instantaneous stimuli (Haverkamp 2007)
– psychoacoustics are only capturing parts of human sound perception, largely excluding important affective + cognitive evaluation (Vjästfall/Kleiner 2002)
– any endeavour to evaluate (product) sounds by psychoacoustics solely will fail in the end (Blauert/Jekosch 1997)
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Sound perception: target groups/context– individual differences of preferences of particular groups of people for qualitatively different product sounds– no simple „universal“ manipulation that will have the same effect on the sound quality of products (Spence & Zampini 2006)
–> target groups (age, cultural background, milieus/lifestyle) have to be taken into account–> it is important to consider the kind/type of product = context
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Emotional evaluation and functional contentModel of affective circumplex (Russell, 1980)
Activation
Deactivation
PleasantUnpleasant
tense
nervous
stressed
upset
alert
excited
elated
happy
sad
depressed
bored
contented
serene
relaxed
Emergency
Warning
AdviceConfirmation
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Sound perception:evaluation of sound (timbre)
To be taken in account:
– psychoacoustic properties of sound
– learned associations
– cultural background and personal experiences (target group)
– context: mood of subjects, expectations, situation
– influence from other modalities (vision, touch,...)
wew
C. Study design
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Functional Timbre Study („sound-colour the Gestalt“)VARIABLES (TIGA)
Independent:Timbre T Gestalt G [pitch contour, rhythm, tone duration]
Dependent:Information-function I [function, e.g. emergency, warning, advice/confirmation]
Attribution A [emotional/affective evaluation: warm, harsh, sharp,...]
A. Timbre: defi nition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Sound-colour the GestaltApproach:sound-colour T the Gestalt G and examine evaluations of subjects regarding information-function I and attribution A
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Example of stimuliSame Gestalt, different timbre
A B
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Study DesignStep 1: free association task3 Gestalt x 8 Timbre = 24 sound-stimuli are evaluated by subjects–> pool of attributes
Step 2: rating of stimuliRating of 24 stimuli on Likert scales of attributes obtained from step 1 + assessment of given information function
Step 3: analysis of resultsPrincipal-Component-Analysis, Generalized-Linear-Models.Examination of correlations between acoustic properties, rated attributes, information function.
–> Findings and results serve as a basis for further investigations!
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Study Design Timbre selectionTimbre differing in parameter values („timbre dimensions“)
spectral content:
temporal content:
attack/cutoff:
static dynamic
bright
hard soft hard soft
static dynamic
dull/dim
hard soft hard soft
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Study Design Gestalt creation Typical forms of sound-gestalt (learned associations)descending major third of a doorbell („ding dong“) (association: welcome) wailing siren, in germany a fourth: a-d a-d (police or ambulance) (association: emergency - alert)
Scherer/Osinsky 1977Tonality: major mode: indicative of pleasantness and happiness minor mode: disgust and anger
Rhythm: rhythmic: more active, fearful, surprised nonrhythmic: boredom
Activity = Fast tempo, high pitch level, many harmonics, large pitch variation, sharp envelope, small amplitude variation
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
Fields of expertise/collaborationRelevant fields of expertise:music psychology, sound-/acoustic-communication, sounddesign, sound-/music-computing, statistical methods –> interdisciplinary team
We are not the only ones:Product Sound Design Group TU DelftMusic Technology Group BarcelonaMusic, Mind and Machine Group (MIT Media Lab , USA)Music Information Retrieval Community –> exchange of findings, knowledge + possible collaborations
A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design
What is the use??
Product Sounddesign
Audio-Branding
AUI (Auditory User Interfaces)
Music Information Retrieval MIR (music catalogues, sound-databases)
Mpeg7-Classification
Electronic Music Distribution
„Perceptual Software-Synthesizers“
...
wew
Thank you!