19
The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University

Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinionin e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

Sopark CharoensukChulalongkorn University

Page 2: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Topic1. Introduction & Objective2. Methodology3. Result4. Discussion5. Conclusion

Page 3: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Topic

1. Introduction & Objective2. Methodology3. Result4. Discussion5. Conclusion

Page 4: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

ObjectiveTo survey of Implementation and Opinion of e- Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System and Technology of Online Learning.

Page 5: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Topic1. Introduction & Objective

2. Methodology3. Result4. Discussion5. Conclusion

Page 6: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Methodology

1. The population of this research was university lecturers, Teaching in Online Learning in University with Open Online Learning.

2. The subjects in this research were 90 Lecturers, teaching in Online Learning in University with Open Online Learning.

3. The research tool was a set of Likert Check list questionnaire which was a survey questionnaire about the opinion of learning activities, LMS tools in Thai universities.

4. The data analysis4.1 To analyze the data of state of online activities,

instructional media and online learning system by using Frequency and Percentage.

4.2 To analyze the data of the opinion of online activities, instructional media and online learning system by using Mean and Standard Deviation.

Page 7: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Topic1. Introduction & Objective2. Methodology

3. Result4. Discussion5. Conclusion

Page 8: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Percentage, Factor Analysis, and the level of the important of design and production analysis

Factor Analysis amount %Level of opinion

SD levelLearning ActivitiesDiscussion 77 96.3 4.10 .302 HighRole Play 2 02.5 3.12 .736 moderate

Case Study 70 87.5 4.10 .302 High

Collaborative Learning 35 43.8 4.19 .393 High

Experts’ Advice 25 31.3 3.60 .565 High

3.82 .459 HighMultimediaappropriate media format 75 77.3 4.17 .382 HighMedia for content learning 22 22.7 4.32 .471 High

4.28 .442 HighTools and learning systemThe availability of tools 28 17.6 4.14 .347 HighThe availability of equipment 62 39.0 4.10 .302 HighInternet Connection System 69 43.4 4.10 .302 High

4.11 .317 HighThe availability of Technologylesson delivery format 18 8.7 4.14 .347 HighThe availability of equipment 64 30.8 4.29 .455 HighInternet Connection System 72 34.6 4.28 .527 HighThe availability of equipment for learning in university

54 26.0 4.22 .503 High

4.23 .458 High

Page 9: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Learning Activity

DISCUSSION

ROLE PLAY

CASE STUDYCOLLABORATIVE

LEARNING

EXPERT ADVICE

Opinion Level

This figure showed the current state and the opinion about the important of learning activities

Page 10: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

MultimediaOpinion Level

77.3

22.7

0102030405060708090

100

APPROPIATE MEDIA FORMAT MEDIA FOR CONTENT LEARNING

This figure showed that the current state and the opinion about the important of multimedia for learning

Page 11: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Tools & LMSOpinion Level

This figure showed that the current state and the opinion about the important of LMS

THE AVAILABILITYOF TOOLS

THE AVAILABILITYOF EQUIPMENT

INTERNETCONECTIONSYSTEM

Page 12: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Topic1. Introduction & Objective2. Methodology3. Result

4. Discussion5. Conclusion

Page 13: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The availability of tools

Media for Content Learning

Role Play, Collaborative Learning, and

Experts’ Advice

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Discussion

Learning Management System

and Technology

Support

Media and Online Learning

Model

Online Learning Activity

Page 14: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Discussion

1. LecturersLecturers are the most

important to control the process to the aim. They should understand their duties, characteristics, and attitudes. Especially, they should know how to use the models, methods, and teaching techniques to motivate learners elaborate, wide, profound, and logical thinking.

Page 15: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Discussion

2. FacilitatorsFacilitators are teaching

assistants, instructional designers, instructional technologists, and staffs who facilitated to design, attend, motivate, and control classes. Lecturers should share the ideas, knowledge, and to propose the ideas in content learning for learners.

Page 16: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Discussion

3.LMSTools and learning

system are the communication channels to communicate between teachers and learners. There are two types of the communication; closed system as e-mail, web cam, and opened system as bulletin board, discussion board, and distance conference. The appropriate communication methods will develop learners.

Page 17: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Topic1. Introduction & Objective2. Methodology3. Result4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Page 18: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

Conclusion

The research results can be the data base to efficiently design learning activities and using media online, and LMS for lecturers in higher education. Besides, they encourage online learning for more learning respond of learners and teachers.

Page 19: Sopark Charoensuk Chulalongkorn University. The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management System

The Study of University Lecturers’ Opinion in e-Learning Activity, Courseware and Learning Management SystemSopark Charoensuk, Chulalongkorn University

[email protected]

Thank You for Your Attention