52
Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010

Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Sonorant Acoustics

March 23, 2010

Page 2: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Announcements and Such• Collect course reports

• Give back extra credits

• Hand out new course project guidelines

• Also: I need a volunteer for static palatography day!

Page 3: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

On the Horizon• Today: acoustics of sonorants

• Thursday: more sonorant and stop acoustics

• plus an introduction to the motor theory of perception

• Next Tuesday:

• perception homework due

• stop + fricative acoustics

• Next Thursday:

• Articulatory physiology

• Static palatography demo

Page 4: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Vowels and Sonorants• So far, we’ve talked a lot about the acoustics of vowels:

• Source: periodic openings and closings of the vocal folds.

• Filter: characteristic resonant frequencies of the vocal tract (above the glottis)

• Today, we’ll talk about the acoustics of sonorants:

• Nasals

• Laterals

• Approximants

• The source/filter characteristics of sonorants are similar to vowels… with a few interesting complications.

Page 5: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Obstruents and Sonorants• Sonorants are so called because they:

• allow air to flow freely through vocal tract so that resonance (of voicing) is still possible

• = consonants that resonate

• In contrast, obstruents:

• obstruct flow of air through the vocal tract so much that voicing is difficult to maintain

• include stops, fricatives, affricates.

• Sonorants do restrict the flow of air in the vocal tract more than vowels…

• but not as much as obstruents.

Page 6: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping• One interesting acoustic property exhibited by (some) sonorants is damping.

• Recall that resonance occurs when:

• a sound wave travels through an object

• that sound wave is reflected...

• ...and reinforced, on a periodic basis

• The periodic reinforcement sets up alternating patterns of high and low air pressure

• = a standing wave

Page 7: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Resonance in a closed tube

Page 8: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping, schematized• In a closed tube:

• With only one pressure pulse from the loudspeaker, the wave will eventually dampen and die out.

• Why?

• The walls of the tube absorb some of the acoustic energy, with each reflection of the standing wave.

Page 9: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping Comparison• A heavily damped wave wil die out more quickly...

• Than a lightly damped wave:

Page 10: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping Factors• The amount of damping in a tube is a function of:

• The volume of the tube

• The surface area of the tube

• The material of which the tube is made

• More volume, more surface area = more damping

• Think about the resonant characteristics of:

• a Home Depot

• a post-modern restaurant

• a movie theater

• an anechoic chamber

Page 11: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

An Anechoic Chamber

Page 12: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Resonance and Recording• Remember: any room will reverberate at its characteristic resonant frequencies

• Hence: high quality sound recordings need to be made in specially designed rooms which damp any reverberation

• Examples:

• Classroom recording (29 dB signal-to-noise ratio)

• “Soundproof” booth (44 dB SNR)

• Anechoic chamber (90 dB SNR)

Page 13: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Spectrograms

classroom

“soundproof” booth

Page 14: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Spectrograms

anechoic chamber

Page 15: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Inside Your Nose• In nasals, air flows through the nasal cavities.

• The resonating “filter” of nasal sounds therefore has:

• increased volume

• increased surface area

• increased damping

• Note:

• the exact size and shape of the nasal cavities varies wildly from speaker to speaker.

Page 16: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasal Variability• Measurements based on MRI data (Dang et al., 1994)

Page 17: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping Effects, part 1

[m] [m]

• Damping by the nasal cavities decreases the overall amplitude of the sound coming out through the nose.

Page 18: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping Effects, part 2• How might the power spectrum of an undamped wave:

• Compare to that of a damped wave?

• A: Undamped waves have only one component;

• Damped waves have a broader range of components.

Page 19: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

100 Hz sinewave

90 Hz sinewave

110 Hz sinewave

+

+

Here’s Why

Page 20: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

The Result

90 Hz +

100 Hz +

110 Hz

• If the 90 Hz and 110 Hz components have less amplitude than the 100 Hz wave, there will be less damping:

Page 21: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping Spectra

light

medium

Page 22: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Damping Spectra

heavy

• Damping increases the bandwidth of the resonating filter.

• Bandwidth = the range of frequencies over which a filter will respond at .707 of its maximum output.

• Nasal formants will have a larger bandwidth than vowel formants.

Page 23: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Bandwidth in Spectrograms

The formants in nasals have increased bandwidth, in comparison to the formants in vowels.

F3 of [m] F3 of

Page 24: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasal Formants• The values of formant frequencies for nasal stops can be calculated according to the same formula that we used for to calculate formant frequencies for an open tube.

• fn = (2n - 1) * c

4L

• The simplest case: uvular nasal .

• The length of the tube is a combination of:

• distance from glottis to uvula (9 cm)

• distance from uvula to nares (12.5 cm)

• An average tube length (for adult males): 21.5 cm

Page 25: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

The Math

12.5 cm

9 cm

fn = (2n - 1) * c

4L

L = 21.5 cm

c = 35000 cm/sec

F1 = 35000

86

= 407 Hz

F2 = 1221 Hz

F3 = 2035 Hz

Page 26: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

The Real Thing• Check out Peter’s production of an uvular nasal in Praat.

• And also Dustin’s neutral vowel!

• Note: the higher formants are low in amplitude

• Some reasons why:

• Overall damping

• “Nare-rounding” reduces intensity

• Resonance is lost in the side passages of the sinuses.

• Nasal stops with fronter places of articulation also have anti-formants.

Page 27: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Anti-Formants• For nasal stops, the occlusion in the mouth creates a side cavity.

• This side cavity resonates at particular frequencies.

• These resonances absorb acoustic energy in the system.

• They form anti-formants

Page 28: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Anti-Formant Math• Anti-formant resonances are based on the length of the vocal tract tube.

• For [m], this length is about 8 cm. 8 cm

• fn = (2n - 1) * c

4LL = 8 cm

AF1 = 35000 / 4*8 = 1094 Hz

AF2 = 3281 Hz

etc.

Page 29: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Spectral Signatures• In a spectrogram, acoustic energy lowers--or drops out completely--at the anti-formant frequencies.

anti-formants

Page 30: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasal Place Cues• At more posterior places of articulation, the “anti-resonating” tube is shorter.

• anti-formant frequencies will be higher.

• for [n], L = 5.5 cm

• AF1 = 1600 Hz

• AF2 = 4800 Hz

• for , L = 3.3 cm

• AF1 = 2650 Hz

• for , L = 2.3 cm

• AF1 = 3700 Hz

Page 31: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

[m] vs. [n]

• Production of [meno], by a speaker of Tsonga

• Tsonga is spoken in South Africa and Mozambique

[m] [e] [n] [o]

AF1 (m)

AF1 (n)

Page 32: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasal Stop Acoustics: Summary

• Here’s the general pattern of what to look for in a spectrogram for nasals:

1. Periodic voicing.

2. Overall amplitude lower than in vowels.

3. Formants (resonance).

4. Formants have broad bandwidths.

5. Low frequency first formant.

6. Less space between formants.

7. Higher formants have low amplitude.

Page 33: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Perceiving Nasal Place• Nasal “murmurs” do not provide particularly strong cues to place of articulation.

• Can you identify the following as [m], [n] or ?

• Repp (1986) found that listeners can only distinguish between [n] and [m] 72% of the time.

• Transitions provide important place cues for nasals.

• Repp (1986): 95% of nasals identified correctly when presented with the first 10 msec of the following vowel.

• Can you identify these nasal + transition combos?

Page 34: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasalized Vowel Acoustics• Remember: vowels are often nasalized next to a nasal

stop.

• This can obscure formant transitions.

• The acoustics of nasalized vowels are very complex.

• They include:

1. Formants for oral tract.

2. Formants for nasal tract.

3. Anti-formants for nasal passageway.

• Plus:

• Larger bandwidths

• Lower overall amplitude

Page 35: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasal Vowel Movie

QuickTime™ and aCinepak decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 36: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Chinantec• The Chinantec language contrasts two degrees of nasalization on vowels.

• Chinantec is spoken near Oaxaca, Mexico.

• Check out the X-ray video evidence….

Page 37: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Oral vs. Partly Nasal

• Note: extra formants + expanded bandwidth…

• Tends to smear all resonances together in the frequency dimension.

Page 38: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Partly vs. Wholly Nasal

Page 39: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

!Xoo Oral and Nasal Vowels

Page 40: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasal Vowel Acoustics• The smearing of vowel formants can obscure F1 (vowel height) differences

• high vowels sound low

• low vowels sound high

• Note: American South “pen” vs. “pin”

• French: [le] vs.

[lo] vs.

Page 41: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Measuring Nasality

• One method of measuring oral and nasal airflow simultaneously involves using an airflow mask.

• The mask contains pressure transducers in separate nasal and oral chambers.

Page 42: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Airflow Samples• The airflow mask spits out readings of the amount of air flowing out of the nose and the mouth at the same time.

• nasal vowels: concomitant airflow through both mouth and nose

• nasal stops: airflow only through nose

Page 43: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Vowel Nasalization

Page 44: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Nasometer• A tool which has been developed for studying the nasalization of vowels (and other segments) is the Nasometer.

• The Nasometer uses two microphones to measure airflow through both the mouth and nose at the same time.

http://www.kayelemetrics.com/Product%20Info/6400/6400.htm

Page 45: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Laterals• Laterals are produced by constricting the sides of the tongue towards the center of the mouth.

• Air may pass through the mouth on either both sides of the tongue…

• or on just one side of the tongue.

Page 46: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Lateral Acoustics• The central constriction traps the flow of air in a “side branch” of the vocal tract.

• This side branch makes the acoustics of laterals similar to the acoustics of nasals.

• In particular: acoustic energy trapped in the side branch sets up “anti-formants”

• Also: some damping

• …but not as much as in nasals.

Page 47: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

• Primary resonances of lateral approximants are the same as those of for vocal tract length of 17.5 cm

• 500 Hz, 1500 Hz, 2500 Hz...

• However, F1 is consistently low (300 - 400 Hz)

4 cm

17.5 cm

• Anti-formant arises from a side tube of length 4cm

• AF1 = 2125 Hz

Page 48: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Laterals in Reality• Check out the Mid-Waghi and Zulu laterals in Praat

Mid-Waghi: [alala]

Page 49: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Velarization of [l]• [l] often has low F2 in English because it is velarized

• = produced with the back of the tongue raised

• = “dark” [l]

• symbolized

• Perturbation Theory flashback:

• There is an anti-node for F2 in the velar region

• constrictions there lower F2

Page 50: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

Dark vs. Clear /l/

[alala]

•/l/ often has low F2 in English because it is velarized.

Page 51: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

[l] vs. [n]• Laterals are usually more intense than nasals

• less volume, less surface area = less damping

• break between vowels and laterals is less clear

[ ] [ n ]

Page 52: Sonorant Acoustics March 23, 2010 Announcements and Such Collect course reports Give back extra credits Hand out new course project guidelines Also:

[l] vs.• [l] and are primarily distinguished by F3

• much lower in

• Also: [l] usually has lower F2 in English

[ ] [ ]