2
Solutions to Improve Stream-Aquifer Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis Y. Cousquer, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, France A. Pryet, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, France N. Flipo, Geosciences Department, MINES ParisTech, France O. Atteia, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, France A. Dupuy, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, France Key words: Groundwater – surface water exchanges, Parameter estimation, Uncertainty quantification Introduction The inverse problem of groundwater models is often ill-posed and model parameters are likely to be poorly constrained. This is particularly the case for groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) models, where independent estimates of surface water in/outflow are most important for constraining surface water exchanges. A thorough parameter estimation, on divers data type (flow, transport, etc), coupled with a quantification of parametric and predictive uncertainty can lead to a robust and practical model. However, the computational burden can be the primary barrier to perform those analysis that generally requires several thousands of model runs. Some ways are proposed herein to overcome the computational issue. An efficient way to use a head-dependant boundary conditions to obtain frugal GW-SW models with coarse 2D grids and a surrogate GW-SW transport model with a short computation time. The Approach A Local 2D Vertical Model for the Estimation of CRIV in GW-SW Model The proposed approach consists, at first, in simplifying the model structure using a head - dependent flux boundary condition based on a river conductance (CRIV ) which allows a coarser and a 2D grid that significantly reduces the computation time compared to a fixed head boundary condition that required a 3D fine grid. The value of CRIV is obtained with a flexible tool based on a 2D numerical model in a local vertical cross-section, where CRIV is computed from selected geometric and hydrodynamic parameters [1] available online [2]. Thus, the estimate of CRIV from prior information can constitute an relevant initial and regularization value with physical meaning. Figure 1: The local 2D vertical finite element model transverse to the river (forefront, A) is used for the estimation of the CRIV controlling the Cauchy boundary condition in the regional 2D horizontal finite difference model (background, B), The probabilistic distribution of CRIV (C) is obtained with the presented tool from the distributions of input parameters.

Solutions to Improve Stream-Aquifer Model Parameter ... · predictive uncertainty can lead to a robust and practical model. However, the computational burden can be the primary barrier

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Solutions to Improve Stream-Aquifer Model Parameter ... · predictive uncertainty can lead to a robust and practical model. However, the computational burden can be the primary barrier

Solutions to Improve Stream-Aquifer Model Parameter Estimation

and Uncertainty Analysis

Y. Cousquer, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, FranceA. Pryet, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, France

N. Flipo, Geosciences Department, MINES ParisTech, FranceO. Atteia, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, FranceA. Dupuy, EA 4592 Georessources & Environment, France

Key words: Groundwater – surface water exchanges, Parameter estimation, Uncertainty quantification

Introduction

The inverse problem of groundwater models is often ill-posed and model parameters are likely to be poorlyconstrained. This is particularly the case for groundwater-surface water (GW-SW) models, where independentestimates of surface water in/outflow are most important for constraining surface water exchanges. A thoroughparameter estimation, on divers data type (flow, transport, etc), coupled with a quantification of parametric andpredictive uncertainty can lead to a robust and practical model. However, the computational burden can be theprimary barrier to perform those analysis that generally requires several thousands of model runs. Some waysare proposed herein to overcome the computational issue. An efficient way to use a head-dependant boundaryconditions to obtain frugal GW-SW models with coarse 2D grids and a surrogate GW-SW transport modelwith a short computation time.

The Approach

A Local 2D Vertical Model for the Estimation of CRIV in GW-SW Model

The proposed approach consists, at first, in simplifying the model structure using a head - dependent fluxboundary condition based on a river conductance (CRIV ) which allows a coarser and a 2D grid that significantlyreduces the computation time compared to a fixed head boundary condition that required a 3D fine grid. Thevalue of CRIV is obtained with a flexible tool based on a 2D numerical model in a local vertical cross-section,where CRIV is computed from selected geometric and hydrodynamic parameters [1] available online [2]. Thus,the estimate of CRIV from prior information can constitute an relevant initial and regularization value withphysical meaning.

Figure 1: The local 2D vertical finite element model transverse to the river (forefront, A) is used for the estimation ofthe CRIV controlling the Cauchy boundary condition in the regional 2D horizontal finite difference model (background,B), The probabilistic distribution of CRIV (C) is obtained with the presented tool from the distributions of inputparameters.

Page 2: Solutions to Improve Stream-Aquifer Model Parameter ... · predictive uncertainty can lead to a robust and practical model. However, the computational burden can be the primary barrier

A Surrogate Model to Overcome Computational Burden of GW-SW Transport Simulation

Secondly, we developed a surrogate GW-SW transport model based on particle tracking, with a very short com-putation time compared to the classical advective-dispersive model. The proposed model has been validated ona synthetic and a real case study to solve the inverse problem and perform uncertainty quantification with theNSMC approach. This development enables the user to add SW-GW transport information to the parameterestimation process that markedly reduces parameter uncertainty [3].

Figure 2: Comparison between hydraulic conductivity field and standard deviation log the hydraulic conductivity at pilotpoint of NSMC sets. Uncertainty of hydraulic conductivity decreases when mixing ratio observations are incorporated.

Conclusion

This approach can be applied to a wide range of SW-GW modeling problems at different scales. The very shortcomputation times of the surrogate transport model, on a frugal GW-SW exchange model based on a relevantstream condition, make possible the execution of many thousands of model runs in a reasonable amount oftime.This enables us to resolve the computational burden and then, increase robustness of SW-GW modelsprediction and make possible the use of advanced techniques to optimize decision variables.

References

[1] Cousquer, Y., Pryet, A., Flipo, N., Delbart, C., Dupuy, A. (2017) Estimating River Conductance from PriorInformation to Improve SurfaceSubsurface Model Calibration.Groundwater, 55(3), 408-418.

[2] https://github.com/rivtools/Criv.

[3] Cousquer, Y., Pryet A., Atteia, O., Ty .P.A., Ferre, Delbart, C., Valois, R., Dupuy, A. A Surrogate Model to ImproveStream-Aquifer Transport Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis. Submitted to Journal of Hydrology.

2