Upload
joshua-powell
View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Solidification of Peritectic Cu-Ge Alloys in Strong Magnetic Field
J. Gao, J. Fan, Y.K. Zhang, J.C. He
Key Lab of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
S. Reutzel, D.M. Herlach
Institute of Space Simulation, German Aerospace Center,51170 Cologne, Germany
Review on Effects of Static Magnetic Fields in Alloy Solidification
1. Lorentz force Suppression of melt convection
2. Magnetization force a. Texturing of materials b. Phase separation c. Shift of phase equilibrium
Solidification of Undercooled MeltsT
(K
)
t (s)
TL
TStable solid
Liquid
Metastable solid
GV (
J/m
3 )
T (K)TLMS TL
SSTN
T
Like rapid cooling, large undercooling can lead to the formation of a variety of metastable microstructure.
Question
• Both strong magnetic field and undercooling are attractive for fabrication of advanced materials by solidification.
• If we apply a strong static magnetic field to solidification processing, how will it affect or interact with liquid undercooling?
Undercooling in Magnetic Fields
• Hasegawa (1994): copper in 0.5 T ― Increase of maximum undercooling ― More regular change of undercooling during repeated solidification
• Tagami (1999): water in 17.9 T ― Containerless crystallization by magnetic levitation: T=10 K
• Aleksandrov(2000): water in 0.5 T ― Decrease of undercooling with increasing field ― Neglegible undercooling above 0.5 Tesla
• Gaucherand (2001, 2004): cobalt alloys in 3T ― Co-Sn : T= 26 K, aligned primary Co ― Co-B: T= 20 K, primary ferromagnetic Co
• Asai (2005): bismuth in SC magnetic field ― Remarkable recalescence for T= 21 K
Motivation
Phase selection in peritectic alloys is of greattechnical interest as introduced in my first talk.
If a static strong magnetic field influences liquid undercooling, it will also influence phase selection.
In present work, we did undercooling experiments on peritectic Cu-Ge alloys using the glass fluxing method in a 10 T magnetic field to check this point.
Experimental Set-Up
Big crucible
Magnet
Small crucible
Cu-Ge in B2O3
Undercooling experiments were alse carried out in the absence of a magnetic field for comparision.
Strong Magnetic Field Facility
Bmax=12 TeslaT max=1200°C
Experimental Procedures
T (
°C)
t (h)30
0°C
/h 1200°C/h
1050°C×2h
B=10 T
B2O3: softening at 580°C
Cu-Ge alloy
Aluminia crucible
alloy composition melting / solidification
Ge wt%
14.4
Microstructure of samples solidified in the 10 T magnetic field
Low Magnification High Magnification
All three samples were solidified into a single-phase microstructure.
Compositional Analysis
Element wt.%Cu K 85.56Ge L 14.44
EDX anylasis
Ge wt%
Cu-14.4Ge
X-ray Diffraction Analysis
0
500
1000
1500
2000
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.)
2 (deg.)
Not all diffractions are from CuSS!
Ge wt%
(Cu): fcc
Results of Comparision Exp.
A two-phase microstructure withprimary Cu for T up to 120 K Ge wt%
Implication: Magnetic Field promotes liquid undercooling!
Possible Mechanisms
• Possible mechanisms for the promotion of liquid undercooling:
1) shift of phase equilibrium
2) enhanced purification
3) increased liquid viscosity
4) reduced nucleation barrier
for peritectic phase by
modification of liquid/solid
interfacial energy
Ge wt%
To verify them requires delicated experiments including measurements of liquid undercooling and susceptibility.
Ren (2004):
Spaepen (1975):
Conclusions and Outlook
• Peritectic Cu-Ge alloys were solidified into a single-phase microstructure by glass fluxing in a strong magnetic field.
• The results imply the promotion of liquid undercooling by the strong magnetic field.
• Several possible mechanisms have been proposed, and further investigations will be done in cooperation with partners from DLR, Cologne.
Thanks to E.G. Wang, Q. Wang, L. Zhang, F. Li, and Z.M. Zhou for useful discussions and help in experimental work.
Thanks to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Institute of Safety Research, FZ-Rossendorf for kind support to the present presentation.
Acknowledgements