Upload
julian-gallagher
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
Identifying Risk Areas for Landslides
Florence Carre (JRC, Subgroup leader), D. Seebach, N. Filippi, M. Pizziolo, G. Bertolini, A. Poschinger, J. Fortuny-
Guasch, M. Gemmer
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
LANDSLIDEMovement of a mass of rock, debris, earth down a slope (Cruden & Varnes, 1996)
LANDSLIDE CLASSIFICATION
TYPES OF MOVEMENT
TYPE OF MATERIAL
Bedrock
Soils
Coarse Grained Soil
Fine Grained Soil
Falls Rock fall Debris fall Earth fall
Topples Rock topple Debris topple Earth topple
SlidesRotational
Rock slide Debris slide Earth slideTranslational
Lateral spreadsRock
spreadDebris spread Earth spread
Flows Rock flow Debris flow Earth flow
Complex: Combination of two or more types of movement
(Cruden & Varnes, 1996)
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
MAIN CAUSES
Snow melt and heavy rainfall events water saturation
DRIVING FACTORS RELATED TO VULNERABILITY OF SOIL
• Geology/bedrock material• Slope• Land cover• Soil permeability
TRIGGERING MECHANISMS
• Rapid snowmelt• Intense rainfall• Water level change• Human activities• Changes in landuse/land cover• Earthquakes / volcanic eruption
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
MAIN SOIL VARIABLES AFFECTED BY LANDSLIDES
Affected soil physical properties:
- structure;
- bulk density;
- water permeability;
Loss of soil functions and increase of soil vulnerability to other threats
- erosion
- soil organic matter decline
- compaction (but also as a driving factor)
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
Tier ISource: EPSON (European Spatial Planning Observation Network) projecthttp://www.gtk.fi/projects/espon/Landslides.htm
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
Tier II approachTier II approach
• Synoptic or territorial scale maps (> 1:50,000):
inventories maps used by planning agencies to direct allocation of funds, develop emergency preparedness plans and similar tasks
Usually 3 scale maps (Van Westen, 1993)
• Medium scale maps (> 1:20,000 to 1: 1:50,000):
used for preliminary or regional landslide hazard assessments and feasibility studies followed by more detailed work
• Detailed scale maps (> 1:5,000 to 1: 1:500):
Prepared as part of a landslide hazard assessment of a specific site and should be accurate enough to guide layout of individual structures or specific operations or to plan mitigation
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
Common criteria (1)
Common criteria to delineate landslide risks
- Spatial probability of occurrence of landslides (like density of landslide/km²)
- For tier I approach, landslides have to be defined in a common way by all the MS in order to compare the density
- For tier II approach, the 3 scale maps can be produced according to the purpose
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
Common criteria (2)Common criteria Data source/type of
informationData Quality /Resolution
Tier 1 Tier 2
occurrence/density of existing landslides
statistics NUTS IIIlarger-scale regional/local assessments
bedrock
nature of material + presence of fissures and poresSensitive bedrocks can be Gault Clay and Flish
Map of Geology 1:1,000,000
higher resolution maps
soil properties texture, structure, permeability
not required for in Tier 1
classification/grouping according to?
slope classes: 0-10°; 10°-30°; >30° 250m same or higher
land cover/land useinfrastructure; cultivation density/pressure, mining
Non relevant for Tier 1
100m
climatelikelihood of heavy rainfall events
daily events (e.g. < 10, 10-70, >70 mm/day)
same or higher
seismic risk threshold? threshold?
Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005
Conclusions
Intensify collaboration with EuroGeoSurveys (EGS) Elaborate on qualitative approach, since no
operational approach has been presented
Today’s problems
• Improvements in harmonisation are necessary because:
- inventories do not follow any commonly agreed standards or methodologies until now
- authorities in charge of inventories are either local, regional or national and can be civil engineers, soil scientists or geologists
• Only landslides related to civil damages are listed, others can exist and not be listed (above all in unpopulated areas)