28
Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Why SROI To be more effective and efficient To be more sustainable To learn about value-drivers To improve your work To demonstrate the value the social work!

Citation preview

Page 1: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Social Return on Investment,Valueing what matters

Context, 16. March 2009

Page 2: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Social Return on Investment

• What exactly are we ‘selling’?– A method, a technique?– More accounting work?– More registration / burocracy?– More complexities?Or:– Efficiency?– cost savings?– More income?

Page 3: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Why SROI

• To be more effective and efficient• To be more sustainable• To learn about value-drivers• To improve your work• To demonstrate the value the social work!

Page 4: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Financial Accounting

• How come nonprofits spent thousands of dollars on financial accounting bookkeeping

• The mission is not financial but social• Not willing to spent time and money on social

accounting• …no incentive…

Page 5: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

SROI: Incentives

• Attract new donors / sponsors• Compete for scarce sources (money,

volunteers, etc); • Participate in tenders• PR and Marketing

Page 6: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

SROI: what it is and what it is not

• SROI is not just a number• Based on good assumptions• Transparent• Future oriented• Context • It is a story about value-creation

Page 7: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

What is Value?

• Value is subjective– It may be different for different persons– It can vary in different situations

• Something can have value without cashflows taking place

Page 8: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Value

Price

Costs

Value – Price - Costs

“Value is in the eye of the stakeholder”

Page 9: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Cost and cost savings

• Cost savings always reflect the ‘low’ level of value

• Prices in nonprofit are based on costs• Nonprofits tend to report about costs

• For-profits seek the highest value• For profit prices reflect value, not costs

Page 10: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

The value of intangibles

• Nonprofit services are often intangible• Is it possible to value an intangible

service/good?• How can you “put a money value on self-

esteem”?

Page 11: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Nike

• Nike is not selling shoes…• Know the stakeholder(group): people

between 15-25 years of age• Research their value-perception of image• How much is the stakeholder prepared to

pay?– Can be different for different stakeholders– Can be different in different countries

Page 12: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Valuation • To put a money-value on a product or service, when

market-prices are not available.• Money expresses “value” into a number.• Money used as unit of measurement of value.• What is the magnitude of the value?

Page 13: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Project ABC +/-

Impact 1 +Impact 2 +Impact 3 -

Why percentages and symbols are not enough

Page 14: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Project ABC +/-

%

Impact 1 + 40Impact 2 + 60Impact 3 - 20

Page 15: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Project ABC +/-

% value result

Impact 1 + 40 10 + 4Impact 2 + 60 10 + 6Impact 3 - 20 100 - 20

- 10

Percentages and symbols are not enough…

Page 16: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Valuation Methods

• Willingness to Pay (WTP): How much are you prepared to pay?– Marketing

• Willingness to Accept (WTA): How much are you willing to accept?– Insurance– Taxes

Page 17: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

The value-game

• Making cards (5-10) with different products/services from which you know the value (but do not show!) ; related to the situation of the client

• Insert one card with the issue you want to monetise

• Ask people to put the cards in order of preference

Page 18: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Case: Care for handicapped child

• Impact: less time spent on bringing child to special school

• Indicator: less time spent per year• Valuation:

– Cost savings method: • More extra time to work: extra income

Page 19: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Value-mapping • Put in order of preference (selected on basis of real use; with description)– A new car– Going out for diner– New television set– Less stress about childcare– Subscription on magazine– Holiday to Barcelona – Weekend Center Parks

Page 20: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Order of preference (example)

– Subscription on magazine – Going out for diner– New television set– Less stress about childcare– Weekend Center Parks– Holiday to Barcelona – A new car

Page 21: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Value

– Subscription on magazine (100 euro)– Going out for diner (150 euro)– New television set (300 euro)– Less stress about childcare– Weekend Center Parks (500 euro)– Holiday to Barcelona (1000 euro)– A new car (10.000 euro)

Page 22: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Value Assessment

• Always know what is important to your stakeholder group; what do they use/need?

• Issues related to their live/needs/environment– Young people: Ipod, PSP, Nike, lunch in

McDonalds, etc.– Older people: mobility, welfare facilities, meals,

etc.• Offer 5 till 10 ‘alternatives’;• Don’t ask for their WTP in ‘money’-terms

Page 23: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Ability to pay

• Maybe a stakeholder has the willingness to pay, but cannot afford it

• Government / foundation makes payment– But how do they know it has value to the

stakeholder?

Page 24: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Other way

• “If this project leads to time savings related to your child, would you be willing to…”– Do two days of voluntary work/month? – Ending subscription?– Skip your holiday this year?

– What is the ‘sacrifice’ the stakeholder wants to make?

Page 25: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Participatory Impact Assessment

Scholten&Franssen, 2008

Page 26: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Scientific proof

• Are data 100% accurate?– Biases in answers etc.– No real payments are made

• Marketing plans are based on perceived value-methods

• Do we need scientific proof? Or a range?• Cost - Benefit of analysis• Fuzzy Logic

Page 27: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

The value of a disabled….

• The life of a disabled…is not what we are valueing!

• We are valueing the magnitude of value, created by an investment in changing an undesired situation

Page 28: Social Return on Investment, Valueing what matters Context, 16. March 2009

Ethics

• Is it ethical to spent money, without knowing how much value you are creating?

• If you do not create (enough) value, don’t spent the money!