SOCIAL PENETRATION THEORY

Grace Wattimena - 20120118035 Maria Riska - 20120118024

SOCIAL PENETRATION THEORY

NEW ROOMMATE

“ WILL PETE & JON END UP BEING BEST FRIENDS ? “

PETE JON

SOCIAL PENETRATION THEORY

IRWIN ALTMAN & DALMAS TAYLOR

SOCIAL PENETRATION THEORY

SUPERFICIAL INTIMACY

MUTUAL SELF-DISCLOSURE

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

5

PERSONALITY STRUCTURE = A MULTILAYERED ONION

THE DEPTH & BREADTH OF SELF-DISCLOSURE

- DEPTH = KEDALAMANTingkat keintiman yang menuntun diskusi mengenai suatu topik.

- BREADTH = KELUASANJumlah topik yang didiskusikan dalam sebuah hubungan.

THE DEPTH & BREADTH OF SELF-DISCLOSURE

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

50 FIRST DATES

SOCIAL PENETRATION THEORY1. Obrolan-obrolan ringan terjadi lebih sering dan lebih awal dari

informasi pribadi.

2 . Self-disclosure bersifat timbal-balik ( Law Reciprocity ),

terutama pada tahapan-tahapan awal perkembangan suatu hubungan.

SOCIAL PENETRATION THEORY3 . Awalnya, penetrasi berlangsung cepat, tetapi lama-kelamaan

semakin lambat saat lapisan kepribadian dalam yang terbungkus, mulai tersentuh.

“Social Norms Againts Telling Too Much Too Fast”

4 . Proses yang berangsur-angsur dari penarikan lapisan demi lapisan, akan membuat depenetrasi.

“Close off areas that had been earlier opened”

4 STAGES OF RELATIONSHIP

ORIENTATION

EXPLORATORY AFFECTIVE

AFFECTIVE

STABLE

RELATED TO THE SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY

BY JOHN THIBAUT & HAROLD KELLEY

Relationship Development based on Economic Analysis :

• REWARDS / PENGHARGAAN• COSTS / PENGORBANAN• OUTCOMES / HASIL AKHIR• COMPARISON LEVEL / LEVEL PERBANDINGAN• COMPARISON LEVEL ALTERNATIVE / LEVEL

PERBANDINGAN ALTERNATIF

REGULATING CLOSENESSON THE BASIS OF REWARDS & COSTS

SOCIAL EXCHANGETHIBAUT & KELLEY

SOCIAL PENETRATIONALTMAN & TAYLOR

RELATIONAL OUTCOME REWARDS MINUS COSTS

RELATIONAL SATISFACTION COMPARISON LEVEL ( CL )

RELATIONAL STABILITYCOMPARISON LEVEL OF ALTERNATIVES ( CL ALT )

OUTCOME : REWARDS MINUS COSTS

PERCEIVED BENEFIT-MINUS-COST OUTCOME

John Stuart Mill The Minimax Principle of Human Behaviour - Maximize Benefits

- Minimize Costs

EVALUATING OUTCOMES

STANDARDS OF EVALUATING OUTCOMES

COMPARISON LEVEL(CL)

Seberapa jauh hubungan interpersonal dapat membuat kita bahagia atau justru

tidak bahagia ?

COMPARISON LEVEL OF

ALTERNATIVES(CLALT)

1. Kemungkinan apa yang ada di luar hubungan ini ?

2. Apakah ada keuntungan yang lebih besar jika berhubungan dengan orang yang lain?

3. Kemungkinan terburuk apa yang akan didapatkan jika tetap berhubungan dengan orang ini ?

6 TYPOLOGIES OF RELATIONSHIPRelative Value of Outcome, CL, and CL ALT State of the Relationship

Outcome > CL > CL ALT Satisfactory, stable, and interdependence

Outcome > CL ALT > CLSatisfactory, stable, and independence

CL ALT > CL > OutcomeUnsatisfactory, broken,

and love to stay in other relationship

CL ALT > Outcome > CL Satisfactory, unstable,

and feel better to stay in other relationship

CL > CL ALT > Outcome Unsatisfactory, broken

CL > Outcome > CL ALTMore unsatisfactory but gratify,

interdependence, and cannot broken

SOCIAL PENETRATION THEORY- ETHICAL EGOISM

Maximize Pleasure & Minimize Pain

- DIALECTICAL MODEL Characterized by openness or contacts and

closedness or separateness between participants

- THE ENVIRONMENTManipulate our environment to meet privacy & disclosure goals

- TERRITORIALITY To claim a physical location as objects as our own

>> 0 >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> 4 >>

A WALK TO REMEMBER

THANK YOU