28
Social Europe Cohesion and convergence in Europe László Andor Mercator Senior Fellow at Hertie School of Governance (Berlin) Visiting Professor at ULB (Brussels) Poznan, 18 May 2015

Social Europe Cohesion and convergence in Europe László Andor Mercator Senior Fellow at Hertie School of Governance (Berlin) Visiting Professor at ULB

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Social Europe

Cohesion and convergence in Europe

László AndorMercator Senior Fellow at Hertie School of Governance (Berlin)Visiting Professor at ULB (Brussels)

Poznan, 18 May 2015

Social Europe

Cohesion & convergence in EU Treaties

Treaty on European Union (TEU):Preamble:RESOLVED to achieve the strengthening and the convergence of their economies and to establish an economic and monetary union including … a single and stable currency…Article 3 TEU (objectives of the union):The Union shall establish an internal market. It shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. …It shall promote economic, social and territorial cohesion, and solidarity among Member States.

Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU):Article 121(3) - economic policy coordination:In order to ensure closer coordination of economic policies and sustained convergence of the economic performances of the Member States, the Council shall … monitor economic developments in each of the Member States and in the Union as well as the consistency of economic policies with the broad [economic policy] guidelines … and regularly carry out an overall assessment.+ the ‘convergence criteria’ agreed in the Maastricht Treaty as pre-conditions for Member States to join the single currency (inflation, exchange rate stability, interest rate, 3% deficit rule, 60% debt/GDP rule)+ Title XVIII on economic, social and territorial cohesion

Social Europe

Single Market (EU-28)

Cohesion policy (budget ~0.4% EU GDP)• supporting long-term

cohesion & convergence

• mitigating core-periphery dynamics resulting from competition within Single Market

Social legislation preventing a race-to-the-bottom in working conditions

Currency union (€A-18)

Much stronger constraints on monetary and fiscal policies, yet: No lender of last

resort No shared fiscal

capacity to help deal with cyclicality & asymmetry

“Internal devaluation” as the only remaining adjustment mechanism

This set-up deepens core-periphery divergence

Social Europe

Convergence and divergence in GDP per capita across the EU (1995–2013)

Reading note : EU-15 Centre (BE, LU, NL, DE, FI, FR, AT), EU-15 North (DK, SE, UK), EU-15 South and periphery (EL, IE, PT, ES, IT), EU-13 Centre and North (CZ, HU, PL, SI and SK), EU-13 South and periphery (BG, CY, EE, LV, LT, MT, HR, RO). Source: Eurostat, calculations DG EMPL. Note: GDP in real terms (in euros) — some missing values were kept constant : BG, EE, HR, CY, MT (1995-99), LV (1995-98), EL, LT, SK (1995-97), PL, RO (1995-96), HU, SI (1995).

Social Europe

Convergence and divergence in unemployment rates across the EU (1990–2013)

Reading note : EU-15 Centre (BE, LU, NL, DE, FI, FR, AT), EU-15 North (DK, SE, UK), EU-15 South and periphery (EL, IE, PT, ES, IT), EU-13 Centre and North (CZ, HU, PL, SI and SK), EU-13 South and periphery (BG, CY, EE, LV, LT, MT, HR, RO). Source: Eurostat, calculations DG EMPL. Note: GDP in real terms (in euros) — some missing values were kept constant : BG, CY, EE, HR, MT (1995-99), LV (1995-98), LT (1995-97), PL, RO (1995-96), HU, SI (1995), AT (1990-93), DE (1990), EL (1990-97).

Social Europe

Convergence and divergence in poverty rates (AROPE) across the EU (1995–2013)

Reading note : EU-15 Centre (BE, LU, NL, DE, FI, FR, AT), EU-15 North (DK, SE, UK), EU-15 South and periphery (EL, IE, PT, ES, IT), EU-13 Centre and North (CZ, HU, PL, SI and SK), EU-13 South and periphery (BG, CY, EE, LV, LT, MT, HR, RO). Source: Eurostat, calculations DG EMPL. Note: GDP in real terms (in euros) — some missing values were kept constant : HR (2004-09), RO (2004-06), BG (2004-05), CZ, DE, CY, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, SI, SK, UK (2004).

Social Europe

Convergence and divergence in income inequality (S80/S20)

Source: Eurostat, DG EMPL calculations – Years refer to income reference years

Social Europe

Convergence and divergence in gross household disposable income per capita

(GHDI)

Source: Eurostat, DG EMPL calculations – adjusted for inflation and at fixed exchange rates for countries outside the euro area

Social Europe

Weakening of stabilisation of household incomes in the crisis

Source: Eurostat and ECB.

Benefits

GHDI

Contributions to nominal growth of gross disposable income of households (EA 17)

Labour incomes

Social Europe

Weakening of automatic stabilisation: 2011 and 2012

Source : Eurostat, National Accounts, DG EMPL calculations Note: 2012 data are estimated based on quarterly data from the first 3 quarters. In the current recession, N is year 2009. Estimates of the deviation from the trend in social protection expenditures are based on a standard Hodrick-Prescott filter. Reading notes : in the year of the recession, in the current crisis, social expenditure were around 5% above their trend in Europe, while the GDP was about 4% below its potential (output gap of -4%). Averages are unweighted country averages (since countries do not always experience a recession the same year).

Public social expenditure and GDP: deviation from trend during current and past recessions

Social Europe

Development of household income in Germany and Spain

After 2010Germany: Market income increases with recovery; benefits no longer needed

After 2010Spain: Weakened social benefits do not compensate for fall in market income

Social Europe

Social divergence in the Economic and Monetary Union

EMU with serious design flaws: --uniform fiscal (and centralised monetary) policy

without risk sharing or transnational fiscal transfers --social problems generate spill-over effects on other

members of euro area (e.g. falling demand) --deterioration of human capital, loss of competitiveness

and risk of destablisation and disintegration

Need to restore socio-economic convergence in EMU, e.g. Youth Guarantee and Youth Employment Initiative

Social Europe

Stronger social dimension of the EMU

Ability of economic governance mechanisms & policy instruments to anticipate, take into account & address problematic developments & challenges related to employment & social policies in the EMU; helping all MS to realize their growth & employment potential & improve social cohesion

Better monitoring of employment & social dynamics in EMU: scoreboard of five indicators introduced in European SemesterBetter coordination of employment & social policies to collectively ensure timely actionBetter involvement of EU-level & national social partners in EMU governance

Social Europe

Need for automatic stabilisers in EMU

• Countering „asymmetric shocks” and resulting imbalances with rule-based, conditional and temporary fiscal transfers

• Supporting aggregate demand economic activity employment social cohesion in zones of economic downturn (lacking autonomous fiscal/monetary policy)

• Options:• --automatic income support (based on „output gap”)• --reinsurance of national unemployment insurance funds

• transfers triggered by major crises

• --partial pooling of unemployment benefit systems• (need for partial harmonisation)

Social Europe

Example of a basic EMU-UBS

Social Europe

Dynamic CEE growth since late 1990s:compensation for major income loss in early 1990s

Source: IMF, "25 Years of Transition: Post-Communist Europe and the IMF", October 2014

Social Europe

EU13 employment still well below EU28 average(employment rates across the EU, 1995–2013)

Reading note : EU-15 Centre (BE, LU, NL, DE, FI, FR, AT), EU-15 North (DK, SE, UK), EU-15 South and periphery (EL, IE, PT, ES, IT), EU-13 Centre and North (CZ, HU, PL, SI and SK), EU-13 South and periphery (BG, CY, EE, LV, LT, MT, HR, RO). Source: Eurostat, calculations DG EMPL. Note: GDP in real terms (in euros) — some missing values were kept constant : HR (1995-01), BG, MT (1995-99), CY (1995-98), LT, LV, SK (1995-97), CZ, EE, PL, RO (1995-96), HU, SI (1995), AT, FI, SE (1990-94).

Social Europe

Structural shift from agriculture

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

BG CZ EE LV LT HU PL RO SI SK DE SE IT FR

1995 2000 2005 2010 2013

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

BG CZ EE LV LT HU PL RO SI SK DE SE IT FR

1995 2000 2005 2010 2013

Source: Eurostat, National Accounts

Share of primary sector in total… employment … Gross Value Added

Source: Eurostat, National Accounts

Social Europe

…but manufacturing remains significant

Source: Eurostat, National Accounts

Share of manufacturing in total…… employment … Gross Value Added

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

BG CZ EE LV LT HU PL RO SI SK DE SE IT FR

1995 2000 2005 2010 2013

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

CZ EE LV LT HU PL RO SI SK DE SE IT FR

1995 2000 2005 2010 2013

Social Europe

Stronger labour productivity growth in East before and during the crisis…

Source: Eurostat, National Accounts

Real labour productivity per person employed (2005=100)

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

EU28

EU27

EU15

EA18 BE

DK

DE IE EL ES FR IT LU NL

AT PT FI SE UK

BG

RO CZ PL HU SK SI EE LV LT MT

CY

HR

2005 2010 2013

Social Europe

...limits increase in cost of labour

Source: Eurostat, National Accounts

Real unit labour cost, 2005=100

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

130

135

140

EU28

EU27

EU15

EA18 BE

DK

DE IE EL ES FR IT LU NL

AT

PT FI SE UK

BG

RO CZ PL HU SK SI EE LV LT MT

CY

HR

2005 2010 2013

Social Europe

Low share of GDP for wages

Adjusted wage share in manufacturing industry: Compensation per employee as % of nominal gross value added per person employed

Source: AMECO data-base, National Accounts.

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

EU15

Poland

Slovakia

Hungary

Czech Republic

Social Europe

Still a major income gap between EU13 & EU15Difference in GDPpc between EU28 average and two groups of EU13 Member States (1995–2013), expressed as % of the

EU28 GDPpc, in real euros (not PPS)

EU-13 Centre and North EU-13 South and periphery

Reading note : EU-13 Centre and North (CZ, HU, PL, SI and SK), EU-13 South and periphery (BG, CY, EE, LV, LT, MT, HR, RO).Source: Eurostat, calculations DG EMPL. Note: calculations based on GDP in real terms, in euros. Note — some missing values in the beginning of the period were kept constant for the calculation of averages: BG, EE, HR, CY, MT (1995-99), LV (1995-98), LT, SK (1995-97), PL, RO (1995-96), HU, SI (1995).

Social Europe

Large labour outflows from some CEE countries (as % of labour force)

Source: Eurostat EU LFS

Recent (<10 years) mobile (economically active) EU citizens by nationality, as % of labour force of country of origin (2013)

Social Europe

Faster population decline in some EU13 countries(combined result of low fertility, low life expectancy & emigration)

Total population, 1995=100

Source: Calculation based on Eurostat

Social Europe

Gender gap in employment and pay levelsGender pay gap (2012) as % of men's average hourly earnings (paid employees)

Source: Eurostat, LFS

Gender employment gap (2013) (difference between empl. rates for men and women in percentage points)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

LT FI

LV

SE

BG

DK

PT

EE

FR SI

HR

AT

DE

NL

BE

ES

CY IE UK

EU28

HU

LU

SK

PL

RO

CZ

EL

IT MT

Source: Eurostat, SES

Social Europe

2nd decade of EU membership should be about human capital investment!

The European Social Fund is EU’s key financial instrument for investing in human capital: to improve employment opportunitiesto promote education and life-long learningto enhance social inclusion and combat povertyto improve efficiency of public administration

An integral part of EU cohesion policy

• In 2014-20, the ESF has been given a minimum share of 23.1% of the total cohesion policy budget; in practice close to 25% (€ 85bn)

• Poland is greatest beneficiary...

Social Europe

• Thank you for your attention!