Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
SnSe: a remarkable new thermoelectric material
A radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) is an electrical generator that uses an
array of thermocouples to convert the heat released by the decay of a suitable
radioactive material into electricity by the Seebeck effect. This generator has no
moving parts. RTGs have been used as power sources in satellites and space probes
etc, Figure 1 (a). The first radioisotope power units were developed in the late 1950s
and early 1960s by the US and Soviet space programmes. The United States has used
radioisotope power units on 27 missions, from a Navy navigation satellite launched in
1961 to the Mars Curiosity rover in 2011, Figure 1 (b) shows the RTG used in the
Apollo 12, Figures 1 (c)-(e) show the RTGs in the movie of < The Martian>.
Thermoelectric efficiency depends on the figure of merit, ZT. There is no theoretical
upper limit to ZT, and as ZT approaches infinity, the thermoelectric efficiency
approaches the Carnot limit. In the past two decades we have witnessed a surge in
interest to develop alternative renewable energy technologies. The ZT is defined as ZT
= (S2σ/к)T, where S, σ, к and T are the Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity,
total thermal conductivity (a sum of electronic кele and lattice кlat thermal
conductivity), and absolute temperature, respectively. Therefore, high thermoelectric
performance requires both a high power factor (S2σ) and a low thermal conductivity
(к). Although it is quite difficult to control the above parameters independently due to
their complex interrelationships, thermoelectric performance records have been
broken continuously in the past decade, thanks to the development of new concepts
and/or mechanisms.1
Recently, SnSe surprised the scientific community as a new promising thermoelectric
material, exhibiting one of the lowest lattice thermal conductivities known for
crystalline materials (< 0.4 Wm-1
K-1
at 923K) and without even any doping achieving
high ZTs > 2.3 at 723-973K along the b- and c- crystallographic directions. Hole
doping leads to a remarkable enhancement in both electrical conductivity and the
Seebeck coefficient, rationalizing the impressive performance. High ZT over
300-773K temperature range results in an expected maximum conversion efficiency
of almost 17%.
2
Figure 1. Radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG) used in (a) deep space probes
and (b) Apollo 12; (c) and (d) shows the RTGs in the movie of < The Martian>; (e) the
typical RTG.
1. Crystal structure
SnSe adopts a simple layered orthorhombic crystal structure at room temperature,
which can be derived from a three-dimensional distortion of the NaCl structure.2
Perspective views of the room temperature SnSe crystal structure along the
crystallographic a, b, c axes are shown in Figures 2 (a)-(d). The structure contains
highly distorted SnSe7 coordination polyhedra with three short and four very long
Sn-Se bonds and a lone pair (5s2) from the Sn
2+ atoms sterically accommodated in
between the four long Sn-Se bonds, see Figure 2 (b). The two-atom-thick SnSe slabs
are strongly corrugated creating a zig-zag folded accordion-like projection along the
b-axis.
3
Figure 2. SnSe crystal structure (gray Sn atoms and red Se atoms) along (a) a axis, (b) highly
distorted SnSe7 coordination polyhedron with three short and four long Sn-Se bonds, SnSe
crystal structures along (c) b axis and (d) c axis.
2. Electronic band structure and DOS effective mass
As shown in Figure 3 (a), The DFT valence band maximum (VBM) lies in the Γ-Z
direction (band 1), but another valence band is located just below the VBM (band 2).3
A third band also exists with its band maximum along the U-X direction (band 3). The
calculation shows a very small energy gap between the first two valence bands in the
Γ-Z direction of 0.06 eV. Such a small energy gap is easily crossed by the Fermi level
as the hole doping approaches 4 × 1019
cm-3
. In addition, the energy gap between the
first and the third band (i.e. maximum of U-X to the maximum Γ-Z) is only 0.13 eV.
This value is smaller to the 0.15 eV between the first and the second valence bands of
PbTe, in which the heavy hole band contribution is significant as the carrier density
exceeds 5 × 1019
cm-3
. Interestingly, the electronic valence bands of SnSe are much
more complex than PbTe, and the Fermi level of SnSe even approaches the 4th
, 5th
and
6th
valence bands when the doping levels in the material are as high as 5 × 1020
cm−3
,
Figures 3 (b)-(d).
4
Figure 3. (a) Electronic band structure of SnSe. The red dotted lines from top to bottom
represent the Fermi levels with the carrier concentration of 5 × 1017
cm−3
, 5 × 1019
cm−3
, 2 ×
1020
cm−3
, and 5 × 1020
cm−3
, respectively. (b-c) are the Fermi surfaces of SnSe (Pnma) at 5 ×
1019
cm−3
, 2 × 1020
cm−3
and 5 × 1020
cm−3
, respectively.3
3. Electrical transport properties
When undoped the carrier concentration does not exceed ∼1017
cm-3
,2 Figure 4 (a).
Hole doping increases the electrical conductivity from ∼12 S cm−1
to ∼1500 S cm−1
as the carrier concentration increases from ∼1017
cm-3
to ~ 1019
cm−3
at 300K, Figure
4 (b). For the undoped SnSe, the Seebeck coefficients show almost isotropic behavior
and are independent of crystallographic direction, Figure 4 (c). For hole-doped SnSe,
the Seebeck coefficient is +160 μVK-1
at 300K, and increases to +300 μVK-1
at
773K. After hole doping, however, the combination of vastly increased electrical
conductivity and still high Seebeck coefficient results in a large power factor of 40
μWcm-1
K-2
for hole-doped SnSe (b axis) at 300K, Figure 4 (d). The high power
factors obtained in hole-doped SnSe rival those of the optimized Bi2-xSbxTe3 materials
near room temperature (Poudel et al., Science 320 (2008) 634), and are much higher
than those of the high performance hierarchical architectured p-type PbTe-SrTe
system in the range of 300-500K (Biswas et al., Nature 489 (2012) 414).
5
Figure 4. Electrical transport properties for undoped SnSe
2 and hole-doped SnSe
3: (a)
electrical conductivity; (b) carrier concentration; (c) Seebeck coefficients and (d) power
factors.
4. Origin of the ultra-high power factor
These high power factors derive from the much larger Seebeck coefficient since the
electrical conductivity of hole-doped SnSe (b axis) is comparable to those of the
rock-salt chalcogenides. As shown in Figure 5 (a), the room temperature Seebeck
coefficients of rock-salt chalcogenides plotted with similar carrier concentration of
4 × 1019
cm-3
offer further insight into the enhanced Seebeck coefficients. The Seebeck
coefficient for hole-doped SnSe +160 μVK-1
is clearly much higher than +70
μVK-1
for PbTe, +60 μVK-1
for PbSe, +50 μVK-1
for PbS, and +25 μVK-1
for
SnTe.3 As shown in Figure 5 (b), the Seebeck coefficient calculated with the full,
multi-valley DFT band structure is +168 μVK-1
at 4 × 1019
cm−3
, which is very close
to the experimentally observed value for this carrier concentration, +160 μVK-1
. In
contrast, using a single band model gives a much lower Seebeck coefficient and
cannot reproduce the experimental values. Therefore, the observed experimental
Seebeck coefficient enhancements of hole-doped SnSe can be attributed to the multi
band character of the electronic structure, as shown by the schematic diagram of
Figure 5 (c). The Hall coefficient (RH) is consistent with multi-valley transport as it
shows a continuous increase with temperature in the range 10-773K (inset of Figure 5
(d)). A single band transport would have produced a temperature-constant Hall
6
coefficient. The values of RH in hole-doped SnSe are temperature dependent, thus
ruling out the single band model of transport. The Hall data imply that the
convergence of multiple band maxima of hole-doped SnSe has already happened
below room temperature consistent with the notion that the energy difference between
the competing valence bands in SnSe is much lower than in PbTe. The energy gap (∆E)
between the first two bands is estimated using the slope (-E/kB) of
ln[RH(T)-RH(0)]/RH(0) vs. 1/T plot, which yields a ∆E 0.02 eV at 0 K, assuming ∆E
varies linearly with temperature, Figure 5 (d). The ∆E 0.02 eV estimate is
consistent with the DFT calculation value 0.06 eV, and comparable to kBT at room
temperature suggesting the valence bands are nearly equal in energy. This energy gap
between the first two valence bands of SnSe is much smaller than that in PbTe (0.15
eV), PbSe (0.25 eV), PbS (0.45 eV) and SnTe (0.35 eV).
Figure 5. (a) Room temperature Seebeck coefficients comparisons; (b) calculated Seebeck
coefficients as a function of carrier density; (c) schematic diagram showing the multiple
valence bands of SnSe; (d) ln[RH(T)-RH(0)]/RH(0) as a function of 1/T, inset shows the Hall
coefficient for hole-doped SnSe.3
5. Intrinsically low thermal conductivity and anharmonic bonding
The temperature dependence of total thermal conductivities (tot) for undoped and hope
doped SnSe are shown in Figure 6 (a). At room temperature, the values of tot for
undoped SnSe are ~ 0.46, 0.70 and 0.68 W m-1
K-1
along the a, b and c axis directions,
7
respectively. Compared to state-of-the-art thermoelectrics, these thermal conductivity
values are exceedingly low and surprisingly they decrease even further with rising
temperature. At 773 K they all fall in the range 0.25-0.28 W m-1
K-1
.2 It should be noted
that the thermal conductivity of SnSe is intrinsically lower than that of hierarchical
architecture p-type PbTe-SrTe system (Biswas et al., Nature 489 (2012) 414), as
shown in Figure 6 (b). The low thermal conductivity in single phase SnSe is therefore
believed to derive from the very high anharmonicity of its chemical bonds but other
factors may also play a role such as non-stoichiometry, defects etc.2 To more
accurately obtain an estimate of the lattice thermal conductivity of hole-doped SnSe,
the Lorenz number L has to be calculated based on a multi-band model, as shown in
Figure 6 (c). Using more correct Lorenz numbers, one can see that the lattice thermal
conductivity of hole-doped SnSe is comparable to, even lower than undoped SnSe,
Figure 6 (d).
Figure 6. (a) Total thermal conductivities for undoped SnSe
2 and hole-doped SnSe
3; (b) The
lattice thermal conductivity comparison of SnSe along b axis2 and hierarchical architectured
PbTe-4SrTe-2Na (Biswas et al., Nature 489 (2012) 414); (c) The calculated Lorenz number;
(d) The lattice thermal conductivity comparisons of undoped SnSe2 and hole-doped SnSe.
3
The intriguing question is what gives rise to the ultralow thermal conductivity of SnSe?
The 5s2 lone electron pair of Sn
2+ and its tendency to stereochemically express itself
by occupying its own space in the structure and causing a wide range of Sn-Se bond
lengths is behind a strong case of extreme bond anharmonicity which causes ultra
8
strong phonon scattering. Although all bonding in real materials is anharmonic, the
degree of anharmonicity varies strongly from material to material. In general,
materials with substantial anharmonic bonding have low thermal conductivities.2 Ideal
perfectly harmonic bonds in one-dimension are schematically illustrated in Figure 7.
The force to which an atom is subjected is proportional to its displacement from
equilibrium position, and the proportionality constant is called the spring constant or
stiffness. In the anharmonic case, the spring stiffness varies with increasing atom
displacement, which has pronounced consequences when two phonons run into each
other. The presence of the first phonon then changes the spring constant values for the
second phonon, which thus runs into a medium with modified elastic properties. High
anharmonicity therefore results in enhanced phonon-phonon scattering, which reduces
the lattice thermal conductivity. The Grüneisen parameter is used to measure the
strength of anharmonicity. The larger is the Grüneisen parameter, the stronger is the
anharmonicity and thus phonon scattering. The PbTe system has extraordinary
physical and chemical properties favorable for high thermoelectric performance one
of which is the large Grüneisen parameter of ~1.45. The large Grüneisen parameter in
PbTe can be ascribed to the recent discovery that the Pb atoms are in fact somewhat
displaced off the octahedron center in the rock-salt structure and the displacement
increases with rising temperature (Bozin et al., Science 330 (2010) 1660).
Figure 7. The schematic representations of harmonicity and anharmonicity, anharmonicity is
the deviation from the equilibrium position that being harmonicity.
What is the atomic level basis for anharmonic bonding in SnSe? In our view the broad
range of bond lengths between Sn and Se atoms in the layered accordion-like
structure, which is a consequence of the tendency of the 5s2 lone pair of electrons in
Sn2+
to stereochemically express itself, is at the root of this property. This situation
creates expanded coordination polyhedra around the Sn2+
centers with a mix of weak,
medium and strong Sn-Se interactions which can in principle participate in resonance
bonding states which can be dynamic especially at high temperatures. The resonant
type bonding is schematically shown in Figure 8. This can give rise to a soft
9
malleable coordination environment and crystal structure and high anharmonicity.
Figure 8. Schematic indicating resonant bonding in SnSe.
6. The maximum and device ZT
Doping SnSe with donor and acceptor atoms is not as straightforward as it is with
PbTe, PbSe or PbS. It seems that many conventional dopants are rejected from the
structure or are accommodated to a very limited degree. We believe this is because of
the layered anisotropic structure where each SnSe layer is only two atoms thin and the
locally distorted highly covalent bonding around the Sn and Se atoms may destabilize
guest atoms with large differences in chemical character. We found that sodium is one
of the effective acceptor dopants in SnSe, which cause a two order of magnitude
increase in the hole concentration,3 and a vast increase in ZT from 0.1 to 0.7 along the
b axis at 300K while obtaining the ZTmax of 2.0 at 773K, Figure 9 (a). The ZTmax is
large over the entire working temperature range of 300-773K and likely also below
300K. The material also projects a large so-called average or device ZTdev, which
actually determines the overall thermoelectric conversion efficiency () of a device.
In fact, SnSe has the highest device ZT of ~1.34 (ZTdev) from 300-773K known
among thermoelectric materials. The projected theoretical conversion efficiency of
hole-doped SnSe for Tc =300K and Th = 773K is 17 %, Figure 9 (b).
Figure 9. (a) ZT values for SnSe crystals; (b) The calculated efficiency as a function of hot
10
side temperature (cold side temperature is 300K) of hole-doped SnSe (b axis),3 undoped SnSe
(b axis),2 PbTe-4SrTe-2Na (Biswas et al., Nature 489 (2012) 414), and PbTe-30PbS-2.5K
(Wu et al. Nature Comm.5 (2014) 4515).
Summary and Outlook
The physics of thermal and charge transport in SnSe is unusual and fascinating. The
high thermoelectric performance of SnSe crystals suggests that single phase materials,
strongly anharmonic bonding and intrinsically ultralow thermal conductivity are
promising candidates for developing high thermoelectric performance. It is remarkable
that such an ultralow thermal conductivity can be realized in a simple compound such
as SnSe, as it does not have high molecular weight, a complex crystal structure or a
large unit cell. It is also remarkable that such an ultra-high power factor can be achieved
in a not so narrow bandgap semiconductor of only orthorhombic crystal symmetry. The
multiple valence band extrema lying closely in energy is the key to this performance
which persists of over a wide temperature plateau from 300-773K and perhaps even
wider. Hole doping quickly pushes the Fermi level deep into the valence band structure
activating several Fermi pockets to produce enhanced Seebeck coefficients and high
power factors. The resulting high figure of merit improves the prospects of realizing
very efficient thermoelectric devices using hole-doped SnSe crystals as a p-type leg.
The discovery of exceptional physical properties in SnSe clearly points to new
directions in thermoelectric science in terms of what materials systems might we
pursue as superior thermoelectrics. In this context many more materials are yet to be
investigated, especially those that share electronic and structural features with SnSe.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the “Zhuoyue” program of Beihang University, the
Recruitment Program for Young Professionals, and NSFC under Grant No. 51571007.
We thank Professors M.G. Kanatzidis, H. B. Xu, Y. L. Pei, S. K. Gong, J. G. Snyder, C.
Uher, C. Wolverton, V. P. Dravid and J. P. Heremans, for plentiful discussions and
fruitful collaborations.
Lidong Zhao, professor, school of material science and engineering, Beihang University, E-mail:
Lidong Zhao received his B.E. and M.E. degrees in Materials Science from the Liaoning Technical
University and his Ph.D. degree in Materials Science from the University of Science and
Technology Beijing in 2009. He was a postdoctoral research fellow in the LEMHE-ICMMO
(CNRS-UMR 8182) at the University of Paris-Sud from 2009 to 2011, and a postdoctoral research
fellow in the Department of Chemistry at the Northwestern University since 2011. He has
published nearly 100 SCI-indexed papers including Science, Nature, Nature Commun., Chemical
Reviews, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Energy Environ. Sci., Adv. Mater., Adv. Funct. Mater., Adv. Energy
11
Mater., PRB, etc. He has 8 granted China patents, and 2 US patents. He is on the editorial
advisory board of journals of Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing and Progress in
Natural Science: Materials International. He is an American Chemical Society member.
References
[1] L. D. Zhao, et al., Energy & Environmental Science 7, 251 (2014).
[2] L. D. Zhao, et al., Nature 508, 373 (2014).
[3] L. D. Zhao, et al., Science 351, 141 (2016).
Significance
Statistical results show that more than 60% of energy is lost in vain worldwide, most in the form
of waste heat. High performance thermoelectric materials that can directly and reversibly convert
heat to electrical energy have thus draw growing attentions of governments and research institutes.
Thermoelectric system is an environment-friendly energy conversion technology with the
advantages of small size, high reliability, no pollutants and feasibility in a wide temperature range.
A dimensionless figure of merit (ZT) is defined as a symbol of the thermoelectric performance,
ZT=(S2σ/к)T. Higher average ZT values projects higher thermoelectric power generation and
cooling efficiency. Conceptually, to obtain a high ZT, both Seebeck coefficient (S) and electrical
conductivity (σ) must be large, while thermal conductivity (κ) must be minimized so that the
temperature difference producing Seebeck coefficient can be maintained.
Figure (a) is the power generation model based on the Seebeck effect, where an applied
temperature difference drives charge carriers in the material to diffuse from hot side to cold side,
resulting in a current flow through the circuit. The Seebeck effect is the thermoelectric power
generation model. And in some extreme situations or special occasions, the thermoelectric
technology plays an irreplaceable role. The radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) have
long been used as power sources in satellites and space probes, such as Apollo 12, Voyager 1 and
Voyager 2, etc. Nowadays, thermoelectric power generation gets increasing application in
advanced scientific fields, and the thermal source could be fuels, waste-heat, geothermal energy,
solar energy and radioisotope, as shown in Figure 1 (c).
Figure (b) is the thermoelectric cooling model based on the Peltier effect, where the heat is
absorbed at the upper junction and rejected at the lower junction when a current is made to flow
through the circuit, and the upper end is active cooling. Thermoelectric coolers can also be used to
cool computer components to keep temperatures within design limits, or to maintain stable
functioning when overclocking. For optical fiber communication applications, where the
wavelength of a laser or a component is highly dependent on temperature, Peltier coolers are used
along with a thermistor in a feedback loop to maintain a constant temperature and thereby stabilize
the wavelength of the device.
12
Fig. (a) thermoelectric power generation model, (b) thermoelectric cooling model, (c)
the space probe and thermoelectric generators
13
Fig. Coverpage of Science 351 (2016) in which the paper was published
14
Fig. Photo of first page of the published paper