Upload
umang-thaker
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
1/13
Section A Group 4:
Camille Le BianDhruv BhatiaNiranjana NarayananSaswath SureshSrinithi SSundeep Allamraju
Umakanta Sahu
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
2/13
TriviaSnapple started in 1972 as an all natural apple
juice brandExponential increase in annual turnover $4 Mn in 1984 $8 Mn in 1986 $674 Mn in 1994!!!
Clever promotion strategies Wendy Kauffman as a spokes model Sponsored radio programmes 100% natural
Sold to Quaker Oats at $1.74 Bn in 1994
Sales declined to $440 Mn in 1997
Sold to Triarc Companies at $300 Mn in 1997
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
3/13
Snapple WaySnapple remains a dominant player in the new age beverage category despite challenges of fiercecompetition from other brands
Firstly, Snapple targeted according to lifestyle by
directing the marketing towards health-seekingindividuals
Also targeted based on demographics: 18 to 30 yearsmale and female, especially young urban professionals
Competitive brand positioning as: On-the-go drink in anycontextual scenario
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
4/13
Points of Differences Offered
Authentic Active Healthy
Fun Element Informal Natural Personal Playful
Personal Variety based on need People identify with the
flavors
Vividly Sensual Good taste
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
5/13
Reasons for DeclineBrand authenticity failures
Shifted from core values and was seen to become corporate hence losing itsuniqueness element with the consumer Lacked differentiation and a compelling reason to use Usage was not defined and hence was not ingrained in daily lifestyles
Distribution failures
Resistance from distributors to Quakers proposals Less focus of independent distributors with whom relationships were earlierforged
Product & Packaging failures Reduction in variety of flavours offered Introduction of large sizes, which was against consumer usage of Snapple,
and 16oz was the most preferred size It also limited distribution as small stores did not have space to stock and
display, and truck sizes were not conducive
Image failure Did not sustain fashionability, and was giving way to newer beverages
Consumers felt betrayed
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
6/13
Changes in Brand ElementsLOGOConsumers initially felt that the move to a new logo made Snapple loseits essence (brand equity)
Crapple
PACKAGING
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
7/13
Revitalization Possible?
Clear and relevant values
RealHumanFunPersonal
Individual Alternative
Existence in old campaign
WendyRadioendorsements
Off beat publicrelationsNatural ads
Not expressed recently
With Quaker ads,the essence ofthe brand was notconveyed hence, seen to bepart of the norm,and against theidea of Snapple
Product problems
Change in logoChange inquantityDistributionproblemsReduction inflavours offered
The core values have been expressed in previous campaigns and haverecently been dormant. The brand has also been characterized withother functional and symbolic problems. Hence, these criteria show thatthe brand can be influenced well by revitalization.
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
8/13
Understanding the Brand
Breadth and Depth ofbrand awareness Breadth: Seen as a stand
alone drink, taken alongwith in -between meal(sandwiches etc) notassociated with a widevariety of situations orfrequent usages
Depth: Brand recall is notall pervasive hence nothigh
Brand associations andresponses inconsumers memory Quirky, fun, informal,
natural, real, personal,
playful
Nature of consumer-brand relationships Individualistic,
atmospheric experience Loss of prior brand
engagement withconsumers ( SnappleConvention)
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
9/13
Revitalization - Options
Expand the depthand/or breadth ofbrand awareness
Increasedfrequency of use
New opportunitiesfor usage in thesame basic way
Findingcompletely
differentapplications
Increasedquantity
consumed perusage
Improve brandimage
Create a newmarketingprogram
Repositioning thebrand with morecompelling POD
Repositioning thebrand to establisha POP on a key
dimension
Re-establishingold brandelements
Logo Packaging
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
10/13
Evaluation of OptionsOptions Decision Rationale
Increase frequency ofusage
Accept Addresses the brandauthenticity and
distribution problems
Increase quantityconsumed per usage
Reject Consumers prefer16oz
Not in line withproduct usage
New promotionalprogram
Accept Addresses brandimage and
authenticityReestablishing the old
logo as well aspackaging
Not advisable New logo has been inplace for some time
and going back to oldlogo may make the
image more tarnished
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
11/13
Step 1: Increase Frequency ofUsage
Newopportunities for
usage in thesame basic way
Make the productubiquitous
throughpenetrating the 2million points of
sale
Tie ups withrestaurants (Non-fast
food) Eg. Subway
Educationalinstitutions
healthier optionpromotion
More vendingmachines at dailypoints of waiting
such as train stationsetc
Find completelydifferent
applications
Not in line with brandassociations ofconsumers and
against therequirement to bring
back the brand equityof Snapple
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
12/13
Step 2: Promotion
Sponsorship
Music/dance festivals Youth Convention
Productplacements
Quirky youth oriented TV shows, movies and radio programs
Tie ups with popular movies/tv shows for customized bottlecaps etc (collectibles)
Contests Capture your Snapple moment
TV ads
Storyboards conveying the Snapple lifestyle, using imagerythat consumers associate with Snapple (fresh grass, beachetc)
8/11/2019 Snapple.pptx
13/13
THANK YOU