30
1 SMS, Governance and Accountability Kathy Fox, Board Member Transportation Safety Board of Canada Signal Charlie Human Factors Seminar Pensacola, Florida 13-14 September 2012

SMS, Governance and Accountability

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SMS, Governance and Accountability. Kathy Fox, Board Member Transportation Safety Board of Canada Signal Charlie Human Factors Seminar Pensacola, Florida 13-14 September 2012. Outline. Evolution of accident investigation Drift into failure Safety Management Systems (SMS) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SMS, Governance and Accountability

1

SMS, Governance and Accountability

Kathy Fox, Board MemberTransportation Safety Board of Canada

Signal Charlie Human Factors SeminarPensacola, Florida

13-14 September 2012

Page 2: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Outline

• Evolution of accident investigation• Drift into failure• Safety Management Systems (SMS)• Investigating for organizational factors

o Inadequate risk analysiso Employee adaptationso Goal conflictso Weak signals

• The role of governance / regulatory oversight

2

Page 3: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Background

• “What” happened vs. “why” it happened• Evolution of accident investigation:

– aircraft design– cockpit design– physiological factors– psychological influences on decision-making

and risk-taking– performance of the flight crew, not just the pilot (CRM,

TEM)

3

Page 4: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Reason’s Model (“Swiss cheese”)

4

D e f en c e s

A c tiv it ie sP r o du c t iv e

U n s a fe A c t s

O c c u rr e n c e

O c c ur re n c e O p po r tu n it y

L ine M a na g e m e ntD e fi c ie n c i e s

L a te n t U ns a fe C o n d it io n s

P r e co n d it io n s

A c tiv e F ai lu r e s &

A c tiv e F ai lu r e s

L im it ed W in d o w o f

P r e c u r s o r s o f U n s a feA c t s

P s y c h o l o g ic a l

In ad eq u ate

L a te n t U ns a fe C o n d it io n s

L a te n t U ns a fe C o n d it io n s

L a te n t U ns a fe C o n d it io n s

M ak e rsD e c is io n -

F a l l ib l e D e c is i o n s

Page 5: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Balancing Competing Priorities

Service Safety

5

Page 6: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Limits of Acceptable Performance

6

Page 7: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Organizational Drift

“Drift is generated by normal processes of reconciling differential pressures on an

organization (efficiency, capacity utilization, safety) against a background of uncertain

technology and imperfect knowledge.”-Dekker (2005)

7

Page 8: SMS, Governance and Accountability

8

MK Airlines (October 2004)

Page 9: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Impact of Management

By their nature, management decisions tend to have a wider sphere of influence on how the organization operates, and a longer-term effect, than the individual actions of operators.

Decision-makers need to develop “mindfulness” to avoid “blind spots.”

-Weick & Sutcliffe (2007)

9

Page 10: SMS, Governance and Accountability

A “Mindful Infrastructure” Would …

• Track small failures• Resist oversimplification• Remain sensitive to operations• Maintain capabilities for resilience• Take advantage of shifting locations of expertise• Listen for, and heed, weak signals

10

Page 11: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Safety Management Systems (SMS)

SMS integrates safety into all daily activities.

“It is a systematic, explicit, and comprehensive process for managing safety risks … it becomes part of that organization’s culture, and [part] of the way people go about their work.”

-Reason (2001)

11

Page 12: SMS, Governance and Accountability

SMS Requires the Following:

12

Page 13: SMS, Governance and Accountability

SMS Requirements in Canada

13

• Airline operators

• Maintenance organizations

• Certified airport authorities

• Privatized providers of air navigation services

• Coming soon: commuter airlines, air taxis, flight-training units

Page 14: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Investigating for Organizational Factors

14

• Inadequate risk analysis

• Employee adaptations

• Goal conflicts

• Missed “weak signals”

COMPLEX INTERACTION = NO SINGLE FACTOR AS SOLE CAUSE

Page 15: SMS, Governance and Accountability

15

Inadequate Risk Analysis

TSB Investigation Report A07A0134

Page 16: SMS, Governance and Accountability

16

Aircraft Attitude at Threshold

Page 17: SMS, Governance and Accountability

17

TSB Investigation Report A07Q0213

Inadequate Risk Analysis (cont’d)

Page 18: SMS, Governance and Accountability

18

Employee Adaptations

• Faced with time pressures or multiple goals, workers and management may be tempted to create “locally efficient practices.”

• Why? To get the job done!

• Past successes are taken as a guarantee of future safety.

Page 19: SMS, Governance and Accountability

19

Employee Adaptations (cont’d)

TSB Investigation Report A09W0037

Page 20: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Goal Conflicts

20

YVR seaplane dock, 16 November 2008 (A08P0353).

Page 21: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Weak Signals

21

Collision with terrain: Sandy Bay, SK(A07C0001)

Page 22: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Weak Signals (cont’d)

“We didn’t see [these recent accidents] coming, and we should have … the

data were trying to tell us something.”

-William Voss, President and

CEO of Flight Safety Foundation

22

Page 23: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Pilot Error or Management Error?

• Drift, goal conflicts and adaptations are natural• No one sets out to have an accident; they just

want to get the work done• The decision to value production over safety is

implicit

23

Page 24: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Pilot or Management Error? (cont’d)

• With each success, people underestimate the amount of risk involved

• If investing in safety improved quarterly returns, the company would do it

• There is a complex relationship between culture and process

24

Page 25: SMS, Governance and Accountability

The Role of Governance / Oversight

Q.) Who holds decision-makers to account?

A.) Board of Directors / owner

Shareholders / financial backers

Customers

Insurance companies

Regulators

All of the above

25

Page 26: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Governance / Oversight (cont’d)

26

TSB Investigation Report A10Q0098

Page 27: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Governance / Oversight (cont’d)

“The gap between what is legal and whatis safe already is large, and it will getbigger. … Is this regulatory approach

sustainable? Is it fair to airlines that do everything right? Is it fair to an

unknowing public?”

-William Voss, Flight Safety Foundation

27

Page 28: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Conclusions

• Old views of safety are changing

• No one can predict the future perfectly

• “Mindful infrastructure”Effective SMS depends on “culture” and “process”

• Accountability is key

• Regulatory oversight

• Success takes time

28

Page 29: SMS, Governance and Accountability

Questions?

29

Page 30: SMS, Governance and Accountability

30