Upload
vuonganh
View
271
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
C
ST
SL
De
C O S T E S T
TRANRA
LIPWAY
ecember 201
T I M A T E R
ER MAR
CONSTR
12
R E P O R T
INE LEISU
RUCTION
URE STU
COST ES
UDY:
STIMATEE & CONCCEPT DESSIGN
Chicago | Gla
Client: DumProject: StDocumentReport
ORIGINAL
DATE
14/12/12
Document
REVISION
DATE
Document
LeighFisher Lim
Registered Off
Registered in E
This documentof LeighFisher’sand/or placing permission froLeighFisher. Any advice, opwhole; (b) do nLeighFisher at document. It sLeighFisher hasoriginally prepato advise the C This documentmay use, makemay, at its discrelease of the LeighFisher anresponsibility fthis document
asgow | Londo
mfries and Granraer Mart Title: Const
O
N
K
S
IN
status
N
S
status
mited
fice: 1180 Eskd
England No: 25
t has been preps contract with any reliance onm LeighFisher.
inions, or recomnot, in any way, the date of thisshould be noteds been made. Nared and providClient on any ma
t has been prepe use of or rely ocretion, agree todocument to td LeighFisher, for any loss or dto the third par
n | Toronto | S
Galloway Courine Leisure Sruction Cost
Originated by
NAME
K Jamieson
IGNATURE
NITIALS
NAME
IGNATURE
ale Road, Winn
591354
ared by LeighFisthe commissionn this documentIf you have rec
mmendations wipurport to inclus document andd and it is expresNo liability is accded. Following ftters, including
pared for the exon the contents o such release pthe third party,accordingly, assdamage incurredty.
San Francisco
uncil Study t Estimate
Che
NAME
C Pa
SIGNA
INITIA
NAME
SIGNA
nersh, Wokingh
sher Ltd in its prning party (the “t. No part of theived this docum
thin this documude any manner d on current UKssly stated that epted by LeighFfinal delivery of development af
clusive use of thof this documeprovided that (a, that third partsume no dutiesd by the Client o
| Washington
ecked by
E
atterson
ATURE
ALS
E
ATURE
am, RG41 5TU
rofessional capa“Client”). Regardhis document mment in error, p
ment (a) should b of legal advice K standards, codno independentFisher for any usthis document tffecting the info
he Client and unnt. Should the a) LeighFisher’s rty does not acqs, liabilities or oor for any confli
, D.C.
Project No:Ref. No:
Review
NAME
R Duns
SIGNATUR
INITIALS
NAME
SIGNATUR
acity as consultad should be haday be copied orplease destroy a
be read and relieor opinion; (c) ades, technology t verification of se of this documto the Client, Lermation or advic
nless otherwise client wish to rewritten agreemquire any rightsobligations to tict of LeighFishe
JC1141A0JC1141A0
wed by
ire
E
E
ants in accordan to those terms reproduced by ll copies in your
ed upon only in re based upon tand constructioany of the docu
ment, other than eighFisher will hace provided in th
agreed in writielease this document is obtaineds, contractual ohat third partyer’s interests ari
www.le
BPP 04
0 0 Rev 0
Approved
NAME
S Kelly
SIGNATURE
INITIALS
NAME
SIGNATURE
nce with the ters and conditionsy any means witr possession or
the context of tthe informationon practices as auments or inform for the purposeave no further ohis document.
ng by LeighFishment to a third
d prior to such ror otherwise, wy; and (c) Leighising out of the
eighfisher.com
F8
d by
ms and conditio when considerihout prior writtcontrol and not
the document amade availableat the date of tmation suppliedes for which it wobligations or du
er, no other paparty, LeighFish
release; and (b) whatsoever againFisher accepts Client’s release
m
ons ing ten tify
s a to his to was uty
rty her by nst no of
JC1141A0
TABLE
1
2
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4
5
6
stranraer feasibi
OF CONTE
INTROD
PREFER
BRIEF D
Slipway ..
Finger Pie
Dredging
Bund and
COST E
COST R
REFERE
APPEND
APPEND
lity study task nu
ENTS
DUCTION ...
RRED SLIP
DESCRIPTIO
....................
er ................
...................
d Link Road .
STIMATING
RISK…………
ENCES……
DIX A – STR
DIX B – DET
umber 201 Decem
..................
WAY LOCA
ON OF SLI
....................
....................
....................
....................
G PROCED
………………
………………
RANRAER
TAILED CO
mber 2012
..................
ATION ........
PWAY CON
....................
....................
....................
....................
DURE .........
……………
………………
HARBOUR
OST ESTIM
..................
..................
NCEPT DE
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
……………
………………
R DRAWING
ATE………
..................
..................
SIGN .........
....................
....................
....................
....................
..................
……………
………………
GS…………
……………
..................
..................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
………………
………………
………………
………………
.... 1
.... 2
.... 6
..... 6
..... 6
..... 6
..... 7
.... 8
….10
…10
…..11
…..14
JC1141A0
1
High levoriginall[1]. Thiswest of t
Dumfrieestimatecommissto the svessel aroad andlayout foestimate
A summ
SheePier
Further presenteeffort toof Straninformatpreparat
It shouldWest Pie[2] [3] alocationof the psuitabilitinvestiga
Stranraer feasibi
INTROD
vel cost estimy prepared s included a the West Pie
es and Galloe for the insion, we havslipway strucccess, the pd bund at thor the slipwae for the wor
mary of the co
et piled slipr
details of ted herein. Ito establish thnraer Harbotion for thetion of these
d also be noer, has beenand followins by LeighFispreferred loty of the cosation works
lity study: task n
DUCTION
mates for inin July 2012high level coer, close to t
way Councistallation ofve used marcture, the corovision of ahe former Maay scheme, arks has been
ost estimate
pway to wes
he slipway ct should be he likely ordeour. In thee site of thee cost estima
ted that the selected bang a brief desher, as sumcation over sted slipway are undertak
umber 201 Decem
frastructureand summa
ost estimate he marina an
l has now cf a new slipine engineerost estimatea finger pier arine Lake aapproximaten prepared.
is presented
st of West
concept layonoted that ter of magnitue absence o proposed sates. These a
proposed losed on the fesk study apmarised in thalternative location andken.
mber 2012
e elements oarised by Leifor the instand Harbour O
commissionepway at thisring experts e also includto the east rea to the we material qu
d in the table
£
Base
£812,00
out upon whthe layout haude costs forof detailed slipway, a nassumptions
ocation for tfindings of a ppraisal of thhe Stranraersites are pd constructio
of a scheme ighFisher in allation of a Office.
ed LeighFishs location. Dfrom our si
des the assoside of the
west of the hauantities hav
e below:
Capital Co
Outt
00 £8
hich these cas been dever the construground inveumber of ass have been h
the installatiodesk study ehe merits anr Marine Leisrovided in son proposals
to develop the Stranraenew slipway
er to prepaDue to the ster companciated dredgslipway and arbour. Havve been calcu
ost Estimates
£
turn Low
99,000
cost estimateeloped as a duction of a slestigation assumptions highlighted t
on of the sliexercise repond drawbacksure Report [section 2 ofs can only be
Stranraer Her Marine Ley structure lo
re a more dspecialist nany Jacobs UKging needed the installaving developulated and a
s
£
Outturn Hig
£1,050,000
es have beedesk study eipway facilitynd current have been throughout t
pway, to theorted by Halks of alterna[1]. The mainf this reporte confirmed
arbour wereeisure Reporocated to the
detailed cosature of thiK. In additiond to facilitatetion of a linked a concepa 3‐point cos
gh
0
en based areexercise in any to the wesbathymetricmade in thethis report.
e west of thecrow in 2007ative slipwayn advantaget. The actuaonce ground
1
e rt e
t s n e k t t
e n t c e
e 7 y s al d
JC1141A0
2
In 2007,close to of signibreakwarelocatio
In light primary Leisure Sclose to and a nerequirem
In line wcarried ofor a new
Our viewproximitstates oharbourto fully uis difficuundertathe surrprobable
The alteMarine hampereadditionthe harbcannot bvehiculais also cwater sp
Vehiculathe existrailer alocation
There arthe Wesimpact oancillaryon the frelativel
Stranraer feasibi
PREFER
, Halcrow Grthe West Piificant chanater, the opeon of the Ste
of the curreoptions weStudy [1]. Ththe former ew slipway wments.
with the finout by Leighw slipway.
w is that thety to, and inof the tide ar. However, iunderstand ult to estimking modellirounding fore that this w
ernative slipwLeisure Studed by the prn, both the ebour bed levbe used at lar access is cconsidered tports activity
ar access forting slipwaynd pushed i is possible,
re few advanst Pier site, on the devely boat facilitifuture capacy low value
lity study: task n
RED SLIPW
roup’s ‘Stranier as the preges aroundening of the ena Line ferry
ent land usere identifiedhese includeStena buildiwest of the
dings of theFisher also i
e advantagesntegration ware likely to t would be pthe implicat
mate the likeing work; hoeshore it is
would require
way options dy and in Haresence of thexisting slipwvel is aboveow tide. A sonsidered toto be essenty to the area
r boat trailery. Current usnto the watbut the site
ntages relateother than opment poteies such as acity of the huse for a cor
umber 201 Decem
WAY LOCAT
raer Slipwayeferred optio the waternew Harbouy operation f
es and likeli for the locaed refurbishmng; a new slWest Pier. A
e 2007 Halcrdentified the
s offered by ith relevant outweigh t
prudent to uions of this mely build‐up owever as thlikely that sae regular clea
were discussalcrow’s 200he disused Sway and the e Mean Lowslipway whico be a key retial if Dumfri.
s and the abse is restricteer at high tiis considered
ed to a new its more shential of the a boat mainteharbour to are waterfron
mber 2012
TION
y Location Reon for a newrfront area ur Office andfrom Stranra
ihood of anation of a pument and relipway from All three bro
row Slipwaye area to the
the site to tmarina landthe disadvanundertake a wmore exposeof sand an
he outer endand, silt andaring.
sed in more 07 slipway reStena Line Bualternative
w Water Sprich can be usequirement oies and Gall
bility to floated to very sde. Land pud better suit
slipway alonheltered loca waterfront enance areaaccommodatt site.
eview ‐ Detaw slipway. Sinincluding t
d Coastguardaer’s East Pie
cillary boat ublic slipwaysolution of tthe South Q
oad options a
y Location ree west of the
he west of td uses and thntage of itswave and seed location ond sediment of the slipw seaweed w
detail in Appeport. Accesuilding and tSouth Quay ngs (MLWS)sed at all staof a modernoway Counc
t boats into tmall boats wrchase and dted to comm
ng the Southation. The karea and it ca and facility te an expan
iled Assessmnce 2007, ththe construcd depot nearer to Cairnrya
facilities aroy in the Leighthe existing Quay close toare likely to
eport [3], the West Pier a
he West Piehe opportunmore exposdiment analyon the functt on the proway would beould be was
pendix H of tss to the exihe private gslipway are ) and therefates of the tmarina deve
cil wish to a
the water is which can bedemolition tercial develo
h Quay wall ckey disadvancould not as blocks. A sli
nded marina
ment’ [3], idehere have bection of a r the West Qan.
ound the slhFisher Stranrestricted aco the commerequire sim
he high leveas the prefe
er particularlnity for slipwsed locationysis prior to ionality of thoposed slipwe lower thanshed onto th
the LeighFishisting slipwaground surrolocated at pfore the existide and whelopment atttract a wid
currently vee man handto improve aopment.
compared tontages are teasily be co‐pway here wa and would
entified a siteen a numbemarina and
Quay and the
ipway, threenraer Marineccess slipwayercial berthsilar dredging
el desk studyrred location
y in terms oway use at al outside theconstructionhe slipway. Iway withoun the level ohe deck. It i
her Stranraeay is severelyunding it. Inpoints wheresting slipwayich has goodt Stranraer. Ier variety o
ery limited aled from theaccess at thi
o the west ohat it would‐located withwould impac represent a
2
e r d e
e e y s; g
y n
of ll e n t t of s
r y n e y d t of
t e s
of d h t a
JC1141A0
Considealong thchanging(subject west sid
The planfacility bnew Hasuch lanoffer the
Dumfrie
Plan co
Stranraer feasibi
ring the disahe South Quag facilities a to ground ide of the harb
n below shoblocks and a rbour Officend uses. It is e opportunit
es and Gallow
ourtesy of Dumf
lity study: task n
advantages aay wall and tare focused nvestigationbour with a s
ows the Couboat storage
e on reclaimnoted that ty for co‐loca
way Council
fries and Gallow
umber 201 Decem
associated wthe fact the caround the s confirmingslipway to th
ncil’s plannee area are cued land. It wlocations ‘E’ation of the s
proposed pl
way Council, No
mber 2012
with the existcurrent mariroot of the
g site suitabihe west of th
ed land usesurrently propwould be be and ‘F’ on tslipway with
lans for Stra
ovember 2012
ting slipway ina and Harbe West Pier, lity) to retaihe West Pier.
s for the harposed to be eneficial if ththe proposedboat repair
anraer Harbo
or the constbour Office wLeighFishern the focus .
rbour area. located to thhe new slipwd plan are cuand storage
our
truction of a with associatr consider itof marine ac
It can be sehe south andway was locaurrently vacfacilities.
new slipwayted toilet andt appropriatectivity on the
een that newd west of theated close toant sites and
3
y d e e
w e o d
JC1141A0
The tabl
in the Le
SlipwaSlipway Descript
1 AdjacePier, out
2 AdjaceCommer
3 Improvslipway
Stranraer feasibi
le below pro
eighFisher St
y LocationOption and tion
ent to West tside harbour
ent to existing rcial Berthing
ve existing
lity study: task n
vides a summ
tranraer Mar
n Pros and
Pros
Access a
Good ro
No widt
Doesn’tstructur
Leaves harboufuture
SlipwayWest Pi
Dredge (easier trelativewithin h
Closest such as maintentoilets, wash do
Within seasier/s
Shelterebeginne
Good veStreet
Within saccess t
Sheltere
umber 201 Decem
mary of the
rine Leisure S
Cons
at all states of t
oad and vehicu
th or length res
t interfere with res or harbour
capacity and fler for marina ex
y can be vieweder
material considto remove) comly hard clay maharbour locatio
location to ancproposed boanance yard, Hashowers and chown facilities
sheltered confisafer access to
ed location offeers and tuition
ehicular access
sheltered harboto water
ed location offe
mber 2012
pros and con
Study report
the tide
lar access
striction
other harbouroperations
exibility within pansion in the
d from refurbish
dered to be sofmpared to aterial at the ons
cillary land usesat storage and rbour Office (whanging facilitie
ines of harbourwater
ers benefits for
from Market
our, easier/safe
ers benefits for
ns of the thre
t.
Cons
the
hed
ft
s
with es),
Slipwcomplikelyclear
Expoand laccum
Slipw
Outwplann
Cost struc
r,
r
Closecomm
Restrdeve
Redufutur
Base strenwate
Cost here locatdevewate
Not atoilet
Signifsufficfacilittide.
Majoclay anear
er
r
Restr
Signifsuffic
ee broad slip
way is in a more parison to rest oy that it would ned of sand and
sed to open waikely to attract mulation of sea
way encroaches
with harbour boning perspective
of creating an eture
e to working aremercial quay ar
ricts use of quaylopment as per
ces flexibility oe
of seawall maygthened to accr at base of slip
of creating a necould be higheions due to risklopment opporrfront
as close to Harbts, showers and
ficant dredging cient water deptate vessel acce
rity of dredgingas opposed to sWest Pier.
ricted vehicle ac
ficant dredging cient water dep
pway options
e exposed locatiof harbour andneed to be regu silt.
ater / wave actisedimentationaweed
onto beach
oundaries from e
entirely new sli
eas, encroacherea
yside for futurer the Masterpla
of harbour uses
y need to be commodate deepway
ew slipway struer than at otherks and also redurtunity along
bour Office for d changing facil
g required to crepth at slipway toess at all states
g likely to be insoft silts and sa
ccess
g required to crepth at slipway to
s considered
ion in it is ularly
ion and
pway
s on
e an
in
eper
ucture r uced
use of ities
eate o of
stiff nd
eate o
4
d
JC1141A0
Slipway Descript
Stranraer feasibi
Option and tion
lity study: task n
Pros
beginne
Located
Upgradmajor h
Potentientirelyupgradiare still magnitu
umber 201 Decem
ers and tuition
d away from op
e to existing facharbour layout c
ally less costly ty new structureing costs for a flikely to be of aude
mber 2012
perational areas
cility thereforechanges
than creating ae although full access slipwa similar
Cons
s
no
an
way
facilittide.
Majoclay a
Poor to beland top oacqu
LocatHarbboat
Distamay poten
PotencommStena
tate vessel acce
rity of dredgingas opposed to s
access to top oe addressed. Thpurchase and/oof slipway. Key risition.
ted some distanour Office and yard and maint
nce from existimake slipway lential users
ntial negative immercial developa Line office site
ess at all states
g likely to be insoft silts and sa
of slipway will nhis is likely to reor reconfiguratrisk is land
nce from marinpotential land ftenance.
ing marina servess attractive to
mpact on futurpment of formee
of
stiff nd.
need equire ion of
na, for
vices o
e er
5
JC1141A0
3
3.1 The costof 1 in 6locationgranularthe consfor the p
It is envThe decslab. In perimet
3.2 It is suggsecurity pier shofloated oloaded o
It has bediameteinstalledthe strupier with
3.3 It has besmall bo1.1m CDenable bfor a cha
It is envarisings
Stranraer feasibi
DESCRIP
Slipway
ts in this rep6. Appendix . The constr fill. A high struction of tpiles to be pa
visaged that k slab will beaddition it er of the slip
Finger P
gested that and safety w
ould enable off or onto aor boarded.
een assumeder tubular std at 4m centcture if requh ladders ins
Dredgin
een assumedoats to use thD should be boats to be lannel to be d
visaged that being transf
lity study: task n
PTION OF C
y
ort are baseA provides truction of tlevel check the slipway painted and fo
the deck wie cast over thas been a
pway deck.
Pier
a finger pierwhen launchbow and st
a trailer. OncThis should
d that the fiteel piles. Ptres along thuired. It is enstalled at 10m
ng
d that the slihe slipway remaintained launched, redredged to ‐0
the dredginferred ashore
umber 201 Decem
CONCEPT D
d the constrconceptual dthe slipway has establishperimeter wor the design
ll be approxthe fill materassumed tha
r might be ching or recovtern lines toce afloat, boahelp to impr
inger pier wProvision hahe length of visaged thatm centres to
ipway will exegardless of for a distan
ecovered and0.5m CD to l
g would be e to be used
mber 2012
DESIGN FO
ruction of a 3design drawis assumedhed that a s
walls. Allowann and installa
imately 300rial with antiat a concret
constructed tvering boatso be held peats can be tirove safety,
would consistas been madthe finger pt a handrail wo facilitate ac
xtend to a dthe tidal co
nce of approd manoeuvreink the slipw
carried out to raise the
OR SLIPWA
36m long, 10wings for suchd to be sheheet pile siznces have beation of a pa
mm thick coi‐cracking stete cope bea
to the east ss from the oerpendiculared up againsparticularly d
t of an opende in the copier to enablwill be fittedccess to boat
epth of ‐1.1mnditions. It iximately 20ed at low tidway to the de
by a barge level of the
AY WEST O
0m wide slipwh a slipway aet piled wae of AU20 iseen included ssive corrosi
onstructed freel providedam will be
side of the spen water. r to the boast the finger during windy
grid steel dost estimatee boats to te along the es from the p
m CD. This sis suggested m beyond thde. Provisioneeper water f
mounted baformer Mari
F WEST PI
way with a dat the west alls retainings likely to be within the cion protectio
rom reinforcd in the uppeconstructed
slipway to prThe presencats when thepier while thy conditions.
deck, suppore for tubularemporarily bentire length pier at low tid
should enab that a seabehe end of thn has also bfurther offsh
ackhoe with ina Lake area
ER
deck gradienof West Pieg compactede suitable focost estimateon system.
ced concreteer face of the around the
rovide addedce of a fingeey are beinghey are being.
rted on smalr piles to beberth againsof the fingede.
ble a range oed depth of he slipway toeen includedhore.
the dredgeda.
6
t r d r e
e. e e
d r g g
ll e t r
of ‐o d
d
JC1141A0
3.4 An allow(seawarusing so(+3.5m O
To facilitthe slipwcost estconstrucat a latepermanethe weswill be c
It has bebase. Hrequiredcompact
Stranraer feasibi
Bund an
wance has bed) edge of tome of the OD) to help m
tate vehiculaway to the Wtimate, it hacted as a perer date. Proent road andt of West Quconstructed t
een assumedHowever, add quantity. ted. The mat
lity study: task n
nd Link Roa
een made withe former Mdredged arimitigate the
ar access to West Quay vas been assurmanent roaovision has bd the West Quay, to facilito a level of +
d that the dreditional matBefore beinterial will be
umber 201 Decem
ad
ithin the cosMarina Lake sings (if suitrisk of flood
the slipway via the west umed that tad which willbeen made Quay, this wtate vehicula+4.9mCD.
edged materterial wouldng reused, d supplement
mber 2012
st estimate foarea. The itable) and wding in the M
it is proposside of the the section ol ultimately bto install a t
will require thar access. It
rial will be su also need tdredged mated with gran
or the constntention is twould have Marina Lake a
ed that a nenew Harbouof road leadbe extendedtemporary rhe demolitiot has been a
uitable for thto be importerial is likenular fill whe
ruction of a that the buna crest heigrea.
ew section our Building. ding south f across the froad surface n of a sectiossumed that
he constructirted to makeely to requirere required
bund along nd would beght of aroun
of road is insFor the purfrom the slipformer Marie between thon of the exit the slipway
ion of the bue up the shre to be dew.
the northerne constructednd +4.9m CD
talled linkingposes of thipway will bene Lake areahe section osting wall, toy access road
und and roadortfall in thewatered and
7
n d D
g s e a of o d
d e d
JC1141A0
4
In majoestimatemade opurpose
The basThese figcalculatecalculatiwith eacontractincentivpossibleuntowarprogress
It is strenecessait is recbased odegree oof the bcost of a
The Treaengineeconsideron the pduring prepresencontractmajor ri
The outhigh esthigher leThe factassociatThe outexpect t
The costof the sipreparatthe grou
To detebathymedata to a
Stranraer feasibi
COST ES
r civil engines containedf the budgees of this exe
e costs are gures have bed for the ing these figch task. Thtor compenses in place e that the prd such as us on the proj
essed that try to consideommended n a statisticaof uncertaintudget costs an item depe
asury Green ring project.ring the itemprevailing unproject devent an estimtor to have tsk items hav
turn (high) etimate, the evel of cost tors are selected with the tturn (high) to have to pa
t estimate haite. No informtion of this cund conditio
rmine quantetric survey allow the are
lity study: task n
STIMATING
neering projed herein havet costs for rcise are “ba
intended tobeen compilemain elemegures in an ahese figures sation evento encourag
project couldunforeseen gject.
he cost estier any cost ethat referenal study of oty and risk thcan be madeends on the r
Book guidan. Following ms in the tenncertainty aselopment anate of the the work cave an impact
estimates inlevel of pricoutturn is dcted based oestimate andcosts are inay to a contra
as been devemation was cost estimatens.
tities and deis not availaeas to be cal
umber 201 Decem
G PROCEDU
ects there ive therefore the project.ase cost”, “o
represent ted by summents of the attempt to ido not mats. Notwithge the contd be deliverground cond
mate is subestimate withnce also be outturn costsherefore oute. The level risk associate
nce offers a this guidancnder estimatssociated wind the consprices that rried out proon the comp
clude a numce uncertaintue to the poon the type od it is used tontended to ractor to have
eloped assumavailable to e. Informatio
evelop the oable for the culated in de
mber 2012
URE
s always a been bande. The threeutturn low”
the price at ating a numworks. En
incorporate ke allowanchstanding thractor to dered for the ditions or ex
bject to a rahin the contemade to ths versus estimtturn costs ato which theed with the i
basis for estce, the outtute and applyith that itemstruction pha developeovided the cpletion of th
mber of pessty associateossible impaof activity beo cover scoprepresent the the work c
ming appropthe study teon on the su
outline desigrequired aretail.
degree of ced so that ae cost bandsand “outturn
which a conber of indivingineering ja reasonablce for any shis, with streliver the prtender cost
xceptionally
nge of signiext of such uhe guidance mated costsre calculatede outturn is individual ite
ablishing a lirn low estiming an upliftm. This covease. The or would noconstructione contract.
simistic assud with eachact from highing assessedpe creep, unfhe upper bocarried out.
priate geotecam for the arrounding ar
gn, admiraltrea. The adm
cost uncertaa more infors which havn high”.
ntractor migdual cost estudgement he allowanceignificant corong managroject on timt. This woupoor weathe
ificant uncerncertainty aprovided byfor construc
d so that a mincreased ovem.
ikely range omates below of betweeners increasesoutturn (lowrmally expe phase is we
mptions. Inh activity hash risk elemend as well as tforeseen conound prices
chnical confiarea west of rea has been
y charts havmiralty chart
inty and risrmed assessve been ado
ht tender fotimates whichas been ae for the riskontingenciesgement and me and on uld also relyer condition
rtainties. It and risk and iy HM Treasuction projectmore informever and abov
of outturn cohave been c
n 0% and 40%s in cost thaw) costs are ect to have ell managed
n developings been consnts relating he prevailingnditions and that a deve
rmation of tthe West Pin used as an
ve been usets do not sho
sk. The cosment can bepted for the
or the worksch have beenpplied whenks associateds such as foappropriatebudget, it iy on nothingns hampering
is thereforein this regardury, which its. There is aed evaluationve the tende
osts for a civicalculated by% dependingt could ariseintended toto pay to a and that no
g the outturnsidered. Theto that itemg uncertaintyproject riskseloper would
he suitabilityer during theindication o
ed because aow sufficien
8
t e e
s. n n d r e s g g
e d s a n r
il y g e o a o
n e
m. y s. d
y e of
a t
JC1141A0
The actuconfirme
A breakd
Table 4.
Append
These oestimatibeen spe
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The estiunderta
Stranraer feasibi
ual suitabilityed until such
down of the
Item ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1: Stranraer
ix B provide
order of maing practice. ecifically exc
Value Added
Consultancyand in the co
Design fees
Discounted c
Inflation bey
Site Investig
Environmen
imate rates king effectiv
lity study: task n
y of the chosh time as furt
cost estimat
STRANR
Descript
Construc
Slipway
Finger Pi
Road Wo
Dredging
Earth Wo
Continge
Overhea
TOTAL
r Slipway ‐ Ca
s a more det
agnitude es When usincluded from
d Tax
y fees supponstruction p
cash flow
yond 4Q12
gation or othe
tal assessme
contain a mve risk manag
umber 201 Decem
sen slipway lother studies,
tes for the St
RAER SLIPWAY
ion
ction Prelimin
ier
orks
g
orks
ency
ds and Profit
apital Cost Es
tailed breakd
stimates havng these costthe figures.
porting Dumphase
er survey cos
ent
measure of cgement as th
mber 2012
ocation and , including gr
tranraer Har
Y CONSTRUCT
naries
stimate Sum
down of the
ve been prt estimates The exclude
mfries and
sts
contingency. he option cos
constructionround invest
rbour Slipway
TION ‐ COST ES
O
Budget L
£78,000
£285,000
£124,000
£12,000
£64,000
£79,000
£64,000
£106,000
£812,000
mmary
cost estimat
epared in ait should beed items are
Galloway
However, sts are furth
n proposals wigation work
y is presente
STIMATE
Outturn costs
Low H
£85,000
£315,000
£136,000
£15,000
£72,000
£88,000
£71,000
£117,000
£899,000
te.
accordance noted that as follows:
Council dur
this requireser developed
will be unablks are undert
ed below:
High
£98,000
£360,000
£167,000
£15,000
£89,000
£101,000
£83,000
£137,000
£1,050,000
with industa number o
ring the te
s substantiad.
le to be taken.
try standardof items have
ender period
tion through
9
d e
d
h
JC1141A0
5
It is recoThe conspecialissusceptiuse of mto be sigand cost
It is alssedimenlocationlikely to currentlthat a shform of
It shouldengineeit is by nature o
6
[1]
[2]
[3]
Stranraer feasibi
COST RI
ognised thatstruction of st marine plible to downmarine plant.gnificant. It it uncertainty
so recognisent modelling. In the absbe higher thy available. heet piled slconstruction
d be noted ring projectsno means cof the cost es
REFEREN
Stranraer M
Stranraer Sli
Stranraer Sli
lity study: task n
ISK
t cost estimathe slipway ant which cntime due to Consequenis therefore y is undertak
ed that to dg has been csence of suchan would be Following aipway solutin or indeed a
that recents due to the certain that stimates pre
NCES
arine Leisure
ipway Locati
ipway Locati
umber 201 Decem
ates for marand the dredcan be costlyo inclement wntly, the imprecommendken if the pro
date, no grocarried out ih work, the e the case if appropriate gion is likely tan alternativ
reports haveconomic dosuch “savingsented here
e Report, Fin
on Review, A
on Review, D
mber 2012
rine construdged channey to mobilisweather as lications of ced that a mooject is devel
ound investn relation todegree of umore detaileground investo be unaccee slipway loc
ve suggesteownturn. Thgs” would ain, no benef
nal Report, Le
Appraisal Re
Detailed Ass
ction works el below Chase. In additthe prevailinconstructionore detailed loped.
igation woro the develouncertainty aed informatistigation woeptably difficcation might
d that therehis is adding pply to all cfit has been t
eighFisher, O
port, Halcro
essment, Ha
are difficultrt Datum levion to this, ng wave climproblems oexamination
ks, bathymeopment of aassociated won relating torks at the sicult to instal offer a more
e have beenvolatility to contracts, antaken of any
October 2012
w Group Lim
lcrow Group
t to calculatvel will requimarine wor
mate can often cost have tn of construc
etric survey a slipway at with the costto the site coite, it may bll and that ae appropriat
n cost reducthe market,nd given thepotential co
2
mited, March
p Limited, Ju
e accuratelyire the use orks are oftenen affect thethe potentiaction logistic
or wave othe selectedt estimates ionditions wae discoveredn alternativete solution.
ctions in civi however, ae preliminaryost savings.
2007.
ly 2007.
10
y. of n e al s
r d s s d e
il s y
JC1141A0
APPEN
Stranraer feasibi
NDIX A – SL
lity study: task n
LIPWAY CO
umber 201 Decem
ONCEPTUA
mber 2012
AL LAYOUTSS
11
JC1141A0
APPEN
STRANRA
OuttuItem ID L
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
2.16
2.17
2.18
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
Stranraer feasibi
NDIX B – DE
AER SLIPWAY CON
urn factors
Low High
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.4
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.4
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.4
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.2 1.25
1.1 1.4
1.1 1.4
1.1 1.4
1.1 1.4
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
lity study: task n
ETAILED CO
NSTRUCTION ‐ CO
Description
Construction Pr
Insurances and
Licenses, permit
Site accommoda
Site surveys
Liaison and stan
Testing of mate
Site Supervision
Slipway
Sheet piles for r
Paint piles
Pitch and handl
Installation of sh
Wailings
Tie rods
Selected granula
Supply of concreT16 @ 200c/c edeck slab
Concrete placin
Concrete finish
Supply of concreT16 @ 200c/c ecope
Formwork for co
Concrete placin
Concrete finish
Quarter round n
Corrosion prote
Finger Pier
Tubular piles
Paint piles
Pitch and handl
Installation tubu
Open Mesh Dec
Handrail
Ladders
Navigation mark
Misc deck furnit
umber 201 Decem
OST ESTIM
OST ESTIMATE
reliminaries
bonds
ts, and consents
ation
nding time
rials
n
retaining wall (AU
e piles and touch
heet piles
ar fill
ete for 300mm thw top face reinfo
g for deck slab
to deck slab
ete for cope w top face reinfo
ope
g for cope
to deck slab
nosing plate
ection
e piles and touch
ular piles
ck
kers
ture
mber 2012
MATE
U20 or similar)
h up paint
hick deck slab orcement for
orcement for
h up paint
Unit Quantit
sum
sum
sum
sum
sum
sum
sum
t
m2 7
m2 7
m2 5
m
nr
m3 1,1
m3 1
t
m3 1
m2 3
m3
t
m2 1
m3
m2 3
m
sum
t
m2 2
m 2
m 1
m2
m
No.
sum
sum
ty Rate
1 £12,000.0
1 £5,000.0
1 £5,000.0
1 £4,000.0
1 £10,000.0
1 £1,200.0
1 £40,000.0
Totals
70 £1,300.0
20 £30.0
20 £50.0
00 £16.0
82 £80.0
11 £1,000.0
00 £15.0
10 £160.0
8 £1,250.0
10 £80.0
60 £3.5
45 £160.0
4 £1,250.0
50 £100.0
45 £80.0
60 £3.5
82 £50.0
1 £20,000.0
Totals
17 £1,300.0
76 £30.0
76 £50.0
50 £240.0
60 £185.0
40 £150.0
4 £1,500.0
1 £10,000.0
1 £10,000.0
Totals
Budget
00 £12,000
00 £5,000
00 £5,000
00 £4,000
00 £10,000
00 £1,200
00 £40,000
£77,200
00 £91,000
00 £21,600
00 £36,000
00 £8,000
00 £6,560
00 £11,000
00 £16,500
00 £17,600
00 £10,000
00 £8,800
50 £1,260
00 £7,200
00 £5,000
00 £15,000
00 £3,600
50 £1,260
00 £4,100
00 £20,000
£284,480
00 £22,100
00 £8,280
00 £13,800
00 £36,000
00 £11,100
00 £6,000
00 £6,000
00 £10,000
00 £10,000
£123,280
Outturn costs
Low H
£13,200
£5,500
£5,500
£4,400
£11,000
£1,320
£44,000
£84,920
£100,100
£23,760
£39,600
£8,800
£7,216
£12,100
£18,150
£19,360
£11,000
£9,680
£1,386
£7,920
£5,500
£16,500
£3,960
£1,386
£4,510
£24,000
£314,928
£24,310
£9,108
£15,180
£39,600
£12,210
£6,600
£6,600
£11,000
£11,000
£135,608
14
High
£15,000
£6,250
£6,250
£5,000
£14,000
£1,500
£50,000
£98,000
£113,750
£27,000
£45,000
£11,200
£8,200
£13,750
£20,625
£22,000
£12,500
£11,000
£1,575
£9,000
£6,250
£21,000
£4,500
£1,575
£5,125
£25,000
£359,050
£30,940
£11,592
£19,320
£50,400
£13,875
£7,500
£7,500
£12,500
£12,500
£166,127
JC1141A0
4
4.1
4.2
5
5.1
5.2
6
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
7
7.1
8
8.1 1
Stranraer feasibi
1.2 1.25
1.2 1.25
1.1 1.4
1.2 1.4
1.1 1.25
1.2 1.4
1.1 1.25
1.1 1.25
1.02 1.05
lity study: task n
Road Works
Permanent road
Temporary road
Dredging
Dredging plant m
Capital works dr
Earth Works Move Material farea Dewatering andmaterial
Selected granula
Construct bank
Contingency
Sum to cover adlisted above
Overheads and
Contractor's Ov
umber 201 Decem
d into marine lake
d
mob/demob
redging ‐ silts, san
from Dredging to
d compaction of d
ar fill
at edge of marin
dditional ancillary
Profit
erheads and Prof
mber 2012
e area
nd and gravel
o marine lake
dredged
e lake area
y items not
fit
m2 3
m2 5
sum
m3 2,2
m3 2,2
m3 2,2
m3 3,7
m3 6,0
sum @10%
sum @ 15%
50 £20.0
00 £10.0
Totals
1 £50,000.0
50 £6.0
Totals
50 £5.0
50 £5.0
50 £15.0
00 £5.0
Totals
Total
% Total
TOTAL
00 £7,000
00 £5,000
£12,000
00 £50,000
00 £13,500
£63,500
00 £11,250
00 £11,250
00 £56,250
00 £30,000
£78,750
£63,921
£105,470
£808,601
£8,400
£6,000
£14,400
£55,000
£16,200
£71,200
£12,375
£13,500
£61,875
£33,000
£87,750
£70,881
£116,953
£896,640
15
£8,750
£6,250
£15,000
£70,000
£18,900
£88,900
£14,063
£15,750
£70,313
£37,500
£100,125
£82,720
£136,488
£1,046,411