87
Cutting Through the Eco-Babble Finding meaningful and actionable solutions for impacting health and sustainability Erin Fitzgerald American Academy of Nutrition, Food And Culinary Professionals 1 March 6, 2015

Slides for FCPv13

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Slides for FCPv13

Cutting Through the Eco-BabbleFinding meaningful and actionable solutions for impacting health and sustainability

Erin FitzgeraldAmerican Academy of Nutrition, Food And Culinary Professionals

1

March 6, 2015

Page 2: Slides for FCPv13

2

Page 3: Slides for FCPv13

Photo Credit: Food, Booze & Shoes http://foodboozeshoes.blogspot.com/2010/06/god-bless-queen.html; License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode

Page 4: Slides for FCPv13

'Eating is an agricultural act'-Wendell Berry

Page 5: Slides for FCPv13

5

1. Sustainable food system challenge

2. Dairy is leading and taking action

3. What WE can do today—Go beyond Eco-babble

Food & Sustainability: Cutting Through the Eco-Babble

Wall Street Journal, 4-2-2009

Page 6: Slides for FCPv13

Population X

Consumption≠

Special thanks to WWF for graphic

Page 7: Slides for FCPv13

Our consumption = 1.5 planet earths

Special thanks to WWF for graphic

Page 8: Slides for FCPv13

Our Carbon Footprint

Page 9: Slides for FCPv13

The Average U.S. Household Carbon Footprint

Transportation30%

Home29%

Food, Goods & Services41%

Other Food3%

Cereals2%

Produce2%

Dairy2%

Meat6%

Travel Home Goods & Services Other FoodCereals Produce Dairy Meat

Food, 15%

Quantifying Carbon Footprint Reduction Opportunities for U.S.Households and CommunitiesChristopher M. Jones* and Daniel M. Kammen*

Page 10: Slides for FCPv13

40% is what we buy

Page 11: Slides for FCPv13

The Average U.S. Household Carbon Footprint

Travel30%

Home29%

Goods14%

Services12%

Other Food3%

Cereals2%

Produce2%

Dairy2%

Meat6%

Travel Home Goods Services Other Food Cereals Produce Dairy Meat

Quantifying Carbon Footprint Reduction Opportunities for U.S.Households and CommunitiesChristopher M. Jones* and Daniel M. Kammen*

Page 12: Slides for FCPv13

The Average U.S. Household Carbon Footprint

Travel30%

Home29%

Goods14%

Services12%

Other Food3%

Cereals2%

Produce2%

Dairy2%

Meat6%

Travel Home Goods Services Other Food Cereals Produce Dairy Meat

Quantifying Carbon Footprint Reduction Opportunities for U.S.Households and CommunitiesChristopher M. Jones* and Daniel M. Kammen*

Page 13: Slides for FCPv13

Foodprint

Page 14: Slides for FCPv13

14

Sustainability Food Issues

Pesticides

Waste

Land Use Change

Food Miles

Yields

Local

Land Rights

Water FootprintCarbon Footprint

Farmer Livable Wage

Affordable and Accessible

Labor

Animal CareHealth

Trade

Safe

Page 15: Slides for FCPv13
Page 16: Slides for FCPv13

Our Challenge

Page 17: Slides for FCPv13

40 years =8,000 years

Page 18: Slides for FCPv13

18

70% of world population will live in cities by 2050

2009, FAO's Director-General on How to Feed the World in 2050. Population and Development Review, 35: 837–839.

Page 19: Slides for FCPv13

19

Global middle class will triple by 2030

2009, FAO's Director-General on How to Feed the World in 2050. Population and Development Review, 35: 837–839.

Animal food products demand expected to continue rising globally

Page 20: Slides for FCPv13

70% of suitable agricultural lands already in use or under protection

202009, FAO's Director-General on How to Feed the World in 2050. Population and Development Review, 35: 837–839.

Page 21: Slides for FCPv13

Future net arable land expansion

21

OECD-FAO 2009. Agricultural Outlook 2009-2018. 15th Edition. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, and Food and Agriculture Organization

Net arable land is projected to expand globally only by 5%mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America

Page 22: Slides for FCPv13

22OECD-FAO 2009. Agricultural Outlook 2009-2018. 15th Edition. Organization for Economic Co-

Operation and Development, and Food and Agriculture Organization

Net arable land projected to decline in North America by 2% annually

Page 23: Slides for FCPv13

52% of projected world population exposed to severe water scarcity by 2050

23

Veolia Water. 2011. Finding the Blue Path for Sustainable Economy. Veolia Water. International Food Policy Research Institute

4.8 billion people projected to live in water scarce areas by 2050

Page 24: Slides for FCPv13

24

Foreshadow of what is to come?

Page 25: Slides for FCPv13

25

Total economic cost to agriculture• $2.2B • 7,100 jobs impacted

2014 California Drought

60% of the fallowed croplandSan Joaquin Valley

UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences, 2014

Page 26: Slides for FCPv13

26

Diversity of the biological food system is enormous

Page 27: Slides for FCPv13

27

10,000 + Soil Types in the United States

source: Ohio State University soil scientist)27

Clay Loam

Sand Gravel

Page 28: Slides for FCPv13

28

26 plant hardiness zones (from 1a to 13b)

Page 29: Slides for FCPv13

29

Farmer diversity is very similar to restaurants

American Farmland TrustNational Restaurant Association

3,180,074 farmers

1,000,000 restaurant operators

Page 30: Slides for FCPv13

Source: USDA, American Farmland Trust, 4*% Continental U.S., 40% entire United States

48% of landmass in the US is in the hands of farmers

Page 31: Slides for FCPv13

The REAL challenge: Healthy people…healthy planet

31

Page 32: Slides for FCPv13

Overweight and undernourished populations Food insecurity

32

Nutrition needs vary around the world

Page 33: Slides for FCPv13

Not only more food, but nutritionally adequate diets for healthy people

2012

Today’s Diet Patterns

Population 310M (U.S.)7.5B (globally)

Recommendati

ons

Dietary Guidelines

2050

Good food for more people

Population growth =+ 110M (U.S.)+ 2B (globally)

U.S. Census Bureau. Population Projections of the U.S. and World Population, International Database.33

Page 34: Slides for FCPv13

FoodFeedFiberBiofuel

Social Quality of Life

Economic Viability

Environmental Quality

The need for a sustainable food system

Healthy Food

Page 35: Slides for FCPv13

Enabling a 21st century sustainable food system requires:

2

2. Manage for and adapt to natural resource constraints

3. Advance farm technologies for yields and optimize use of nutrients within a bioeconomy

1. Reduce waste and inefficiencies

Page 36: Slides for FCPv13

37

Unprecedented Change and Innovation Required

Page 37: Slides for FCPv13

38

Farmers can’t do this for us in the next 40 years

if we are still eating too much and throwing food away

Page 38: Slides for FCPv13

Today, 1/3 food is wasted

Lost retail value $166 BDisposal costs add $1 B in local taxes/yr

Buzby, and J. Hyman. “Total and per capita value of food loss in the United States”, Food Policy, 37(2012):561-570.Hall, Kevin D., Juen Guo, Michael Dore, and Carson C. Chow. "The progressive increase of food waste in America and its environmental impact." PLoS One 4, no. 11 (2009): e7940.

Page 39: Slides for FCPv13

40

Food waste is 4 x the impact of buses and rail

4x

Page 40: Slides for FCPv13

1

Photo of average annual American family food waste by National Geographic, October 2014. Buzby, Jean C., Jeffrey Hyman, Hayden Stewart, and Hodan F. Wells. “The Value of Retail‐and Consumer‐Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 45, no. 3 (2011): 492-515

The average consumer wastes 1.1 lbs. of food per day, 401.5 lbs. per person each year

Food waste from the average American family of four adds up to 1,606 lbs. of uneaten food annually.

Page 41: Slides for FCPv13

Questions so far?

42

Page 42: Slides for FCPv13

Understanding Dairy’s hoofprint and our commitment to sustainability

Page 43: Slides for FCPv13

Keeping livestock

was required

for successful

farming

Page 44: Slides for FCPv13

The Dairy industry today at a glance

Page 45: Slides for FCPv13

113 companies & 180 professionals in the Sustainability Council

Coops & Farmers

Crop Production

Dairy Processor

Transport

Retail & QSR

Community

Sustainability Council

We commit to being leaders in sustainability, ensuring the health

and well-being of our planet, communities, consumers and the

industry

Cheese

Suppliers

Alliance DairiesClauss Dairy Farms

Fair Oaks FarmsFiscalini Farms

Foster Brothers FarmGar-Lin Dairy Farm

Graywood FarmHaubenschild Farms Inc.

Holsum DairiesKooistra FarmsMaddox DairyMarBec Dairy

Medeiros & Sons DairyMcCarty Family Farms

Mystic Valley DairyNobis Dairy

Prairieland DairyRovey Dairy

Simonson DairySpruce Haven Farm

Triple A FarmsWerkhoven Dairy

Associations/Government

Page 46: Slides for FCPv13

47

Feed Production

Milk Production

Milk Transport

Processing Packaging

Distribution

Retail

Consumer

Environmental impact

Page 47: Slides for FCPv13

Life cycle science establishes baseline environmental footprint for U.S. DairyPeer-reviewed, published, and contributed to open-source National Agricultural LibraryNational Institute for Food and AgricultureNational Academies of Science

48

Grounded in science

Click here for LCA Special Issue

Click here for U.S. Dairy’s Environmental Footprint

Page 48: Slides for FCPv13

Since 1944, producing a gallon of milk requires fewer resources

Cropland Water Carbon

90% less in 2007

65% less in 2007

63% less in 2007

Source: Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman D. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(6):2160-2167.

Page 49: Slides for FCPv13

50

Opportunities for efficiency and innovation across the value chain

1 Does not include sources related to waste.2 “Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Fluid Milk in the U.S.” University of Arkansas, 2010. Based on environmental andconsumption data from 2007-2008. Natural variability in data ranges from 15.3 to 20.7 lbs. CO2e. The total fluid milkcarbon footprint is approximately 35 million metric tons, with a 95% confidence range from 30 to 45 million metric tons.

2.05 CO2e kg/kg fluid milk consumed

Page 50: Slides for FCPv13

51

Opportunities for efficiency and innovation across the value chain

1 Does not include sources related to waste.2 “Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Fluid Milk in the U.S.” University of Arkansas, 2010. Based on environmental andconsumption data from 2007-2008. Natural variability in data ranges from 15.3 to 20.7 lbs. CO2e. The total fluid milkcarbon footprint is approximately 35 million metric tons, with a 95% confidence range from 30 to 45 million metric tons.

2.05 CO2e kg/kg fluid milk consumed

EcoEfficiency

Innovation

Page 51: Slides for FCPv13

Transportation 28%

Industry 29%

Commercial 17%

Residential 17%

US Territory 1% US Dairy Farms2 1.4%Total US GHG (7168 Tg CO2e) Emissions by EPA sectors1

US Dairy industry is ~2% of US emissions, with ~1.4% of US total at farm gate

Sources: 1: EPA (2010), for 2007 data; 2: US Dairy estimate from Univ. of Ark. (2010), for 2007/2008 data.

Note: crop production for cows is double-counted; it appears in Ag and US Dairy Farms

Page 52: Slides for FCPv13

53

Key findings: dairy uses ~5.1% of U.S. water withdrawal

Page 53: Slides for FCPv13

Variability = Opportunities

We are on a continual journey to a more sustainable food

system

Page 54: Slides for FCPv13

Credible, transparent and industry led. Program that is equal to or exceeds the competition while satisfying the demands of retail customers and dairy consumers.

Demonstrate progress. Buyers and sellers seek proof that dairy – “from grass to glass” – uses practices that protect natural resources and promote community well-being and economic vitality.

Mission: one approach. Create a voluntary method to track and communicate stewardship and sustainability progress.

Single approach from “Grass to Glass”

55

Both available on USDairy.com

Page 55: Slides for FCPv13

56

34 dairy industry CEOs and chairpersons committed to…

25% by 2020

GHG reduction for fluid milk

Page 56: Slides for FCPv13

Small steps add up!

Page 58: Slides for FCPv13

Culinary Institute featured U.S. dairy case study in Menus of Change

Page 59: Slides for FCPv13

USDA Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Working Conditions

60

U.N. Climate Change ConferenceDecember 2009 Copenhagen, DK

"This historic agreement, the first of its kind, will help us achieve the ambitious goal of drastically reducing greenhouse gas emissions while benefiting dairy farmers.”

-- USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack

MOU was renewed April 24, 2013 in Washington, DC

Page 60: Slides for FCPv13

Collaboration with the World Wildlife Fund

http://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/facing-the-challenge-together-sustainable-food-for-the-21st-century

Page 61: Slides for FCPv13

Dairy cows contribute to the nutrient cycle of the food system

Forages (grass) By-Products

Human Edible

Manure Happens 80% humans

can’t eat

Provide Nutrient dense foods

Contribute to food system

20% humans might eat

Page 62: Slides for FCPv13

Collaboration with the White House on voluntary commitment and innovation

Page 63: Slides for FCPv13

It’s Only Waste

If You Waste ItWhat if we could enable a 21st century food system and bioeconomy through food cycling?

Page 64: Slides for FCPv13

Dairy digester(1,000 cows)

Source: Frear et al, 2011 Clean – Soil, Air, water 2011, 39 (7), 697-704

What if: 2 tons/wk of food waste were repurposed?

What if: 2 tons/wk food waste added to manure digester?

2 tons/week

• 226 tons Nitrogen• 28 tons Phosphorus• Green Power for 300 homes

(Annual Values)

• 17 tons Nitrogen • 1.3 tons Phosphorus

2 tons/week Nutrients (N & P)

(Annual Values)

Page 65: Slides for FCPv13

15 M tons commercial & retail food

waste70% of retail

waste

4.8 M tons food processing

waste

109 M tons dairy cow manure

Manure & Food Waste: closes the food cycle

Reduces total landfill by 8%

67

Nitrogen fertilizer for 5% of corn production

Phosphorus for more than all U.S. tomato production

813 M bags of nutrient rich potting

fiber

Electricity for 1 M homes

3.2M cars off the road

Or 25% of total dairy footprint

Informa Economics, USDA, White House, Based on 2,700 dairy farms and average food loss

Page 66: Slides for FCPv13

Farm to Fork

Page 67: Slides for FCPv13

CDC

1.5 Earths

Page 68: Slides for FCPv13

70

TOO MUCH!

Page 69: Slides for FCPv13

CDC

TOO MUCH!69% adults

overweight or obese!

CDC 2012

Page 70: Slides for FCPv13

CDC 2012

CDC

TOO MUCH! TOO MUCH!

Page 71: Slides for FCPv13

CDC 2012CDC

TOO MUCH! TOO MUCH!

1/3 of Food going to AWAY!

Page 72: Slides for FCPv13

CDC 2012

CDC

TOO MUCH! TOO MUCH!

TOO MUCH!

Page 73: Slides for FCPv13

CDC 2012

CDC

TOO MUCH! TOO MUCH!

TOO MUCH!49M people

(including16M children) food insecure

Page 74: Slides for FCPv13

CDC 2012

CDC

TOO MUCH! TOO MUCH!

TOO MUCH! TOO MUCH!

Page 75: Slides for FCPv13

Farm

Fork

to

Page 76: Slides for FCPv13

78National Agriculture Library, USDA

Page 77: Slides for FCPv13

Portion control• Leftovers

Get good food to

people who need it

Recover valuable nutrients

back to the landbase

Provide food back to food

system

Page 78: Slides for FCPv13

Small steps add up!

Reduce portion

size 25%

Page 79: Slides for FCPv13

The average American family of four consumes 14.4 lbs of food per day and wastes 4.4 lbs.

Small steps add up! Reduce portion size

The simple step of reducing portion size by25% could save:

1. Buzby et al. (2011)2. 2 lbs CO2e/lb food produced. Venkat (2012)3. Average price $1.67/lb food. Venkat (2012)4. Meals are 1.2 lbs/ meal USDA-ARS

1314 meals donated

$2,190 in food budget

1 Year

10 trees planted

1 Day

3.6 meals donated

$6 in food budget

Reduce portion

size 25%

Page 80: Slides for FCPv13

82

Reduce Food Waste by 25%

Page 81: Slides for FCPv13

The average American family of four consumes 14.4 lbs of food per day and wastes 4.4 lbs.

Small steps add up! Reduce food waste

1 Day

$6 in food budget

1. Buzby et al. (2011)2. 2 lbs CO2e/lb food produced. Venkat (2012)3. Average price $1.67/lb food. Venkat (2012)4. Meals are 1.2 lbs/ meal USDA-ARS

$2,190 in food budget

1 Year

The simple step of reducing food waste by25% could save:

10 trees planted

Reduce Food Waste by 25%

1314 meals donated

3.6 meals donated

Page 82: Slides for FCPv13

85

Innovation needed for climate adaptation

Page 83: Slides for FCPv13

86

Healthy eating is paramount to solve our environmental and

social challenges

Page 84: Slides for FCPv13

87

Small Steps Add up… Waste Not!

Page 85: Slides for FCPv13

88

Farm

Fork

to

Page 86: Slides for FCPv13

appendix

89