18
Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia Page 1 of 18 PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy ). Subscriber: University of Oxford; date: 02 May 2015 University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online The Tangled Ways of Zeus: And Other Studies In and Around Greek Tragedy Alan H. Sommerstein Print publication date: 2010 Print ISBN-13: 9780199568314 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2010 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.001.0001 Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia Alan H. Sommerstein (Contributor Webpage) DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.003.0009 Abstract and Keywords This chapter shows that killing by night is a major theme of Aeschylus' Oresteia, from the sack of Troy, through the storm that wrecked the returning Greek fleet, to the murder of Klytaimestra and Aigisthos and Athena's description of the functions of the Areopagos Council. It suggests a connection with the murder of Ephialtes, which according to Diodoros took place at night (and which, pace David Stockton, was murder, not natural death); evidence is adduced that this assassination was still a topic of current debate in 458 BC. Some of Athena's words can be read as criticism of the Areopagos Council for failing to punish (or even for having among its own members) those popularly believed to be responsible for Ephialtes' death. Keywords: Aeschylus, Oresteia, murder, night, Ephialtes, Athena, Areopagos, assassination

Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A. H. Sommerstein, The Tangled Ways of Zeus

Citation preview

Page 1: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 1 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

UniversityPressScholarshipOnline

OxfordScholarshipOnline

TheTangledWaysofZeus:AndOtherStudiesInandAroundGreekTragedyAlanH.Sommerstein

Printpublicationdate:2010PrintISBN-13:9780199568314PublishedtoOxfordScholarshipOnline:September2010DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.001.0001

Sleepingsafeinourbeds:stasis,assassination,andtheOresteia

AlanH.Sommerstein(ContributorWebpage)

DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568314.003.0009

AbstractandKeywords

ThischaptershowsthatkillingbynightisamajorthemeofAeschylus'Oresteia,fromthesackofTroy,throughthestormthatwreckedthereturningGreekfleet,tothemurderofKlytaimestraandAigisthosandAthena'sdescriptionofthefunctionsoftheAreopagosCouncil.ItsuggestsaconnectionwiththemurderofEphialtes,whichaccordingtoDiodorostookplaceatnight(andwhich,paceDavidStockton,wasmurder,notnaturaldeath);evidenceisadducedthatthisassassinationwasstillatopicofcurrentdebatein458BC.SomeofAthena'swordscanbereadascriticismoftheAreopagosCouncilforfailingtopunish(orevenforhavingamongitsownmembers)thosepopularlybelievedtoberesponsibleforEphialtes'death.

Keywords:Aeschylus,Oresteia,murder,night,Ephialtes,Athena,Areopagos,assassination

Page 2: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 2 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

Ithaslongbeenobserved1thatamongtheinnumerablethematicmotifswovenintothetextureofAeschylus'Oresteia,theideaofsleepisnottheleastprominent.Itisintroducedearly—intheopeningspeechofthetrilogy,wheretheWatchmancomplainsaboutthedifficultyofkeepingawakethroughhislongvigils2—appearsineitheraliteralorafigurativecontextaboutadozentimesinthefirst600linesofAgamemnon,3andremainsimportantthereafter.4Eachofthethreeplaysofthetrilogybeginswithsomeonebeingwakenedfromsleep,andeachtimethewakingismorevividlypresentedandmoreemphasisisplacedonit.InAgamemnontheWatchman,havingseenthebeacon‐lightthatannouncesthefallofTroy,bidsKlytaimestrarisefromherbedandraiseacryoftriumph(25–9);itispossible—Iwouldsayprobable—thatthiscrywasheardfrombackstagebetweentheendoftheprologueandtheentryofthechorus(39/40).5InChoephoroiwehearfromthechorus—firstin(p.144) theparodos(32–41),laterandmorefullywhenOrestesisabouttotakethefirstactivestepstowardshisrevenge(523–52)—oftheterribledreamthatmadeKlytaimestrawakescreaming(34,535)fromhersleepandforthwitharrangeforofferingstobesenttoherhusband'stomb.AndinEumenidesthesameKlytaimestrawhoasalivingwomanwasawakenedinboththesescenes(andprobablyagain,asweshallsee,atCho.882)appearsasaghost—orstrictly,adreamofaghost(116)—andawakensthesleepingErinyesbeforeoureyes.

Duringmostofthetrilogysleepispresentedasunattainable,uncomfortable,ordangerous—sometimesasmorethanoneofthesesimultaneously.6TheWatchmanhastofighthardtokeepsleepaway,sinceifhesuccumbs,wegather,hewillbepunished.7Inthe‘HymntoZeus’,inconnectionwiththeideaofπάθειμάθος‘learningbysuffering’,wehearoftheμνησιπήμωνπόνος‘toilreminiscentofgrief’thatdripsbeforetheheart(Ag.179–80)—andweneednot,forourpresentpurposes,troubleourselvesastowhetheritdrips‘insleep’8or‘insteadofsleep’,9sincebothsleeplessnessandfrighteningdreamsareafflictionsofwhichweshallhearmuchmore.SoonwelearnfromKlytaimestra[2]thattheWatchmanisonlyoneofanarmyofwatchersatawholestringofbeacon‐sitesstretchingallthewaytoLemnos,whohavebeenawakeeverynight(cf.290)for,perhaps,severalmonthswaitingforthesightofadistantfirethatwillbethecuetolighttheirown.AtTroy,meanwhile,theGreekarmycanlookforwardto‘awholenight'ssleepwithoutsentries’forthefirsttimeintenyears;theHeraldwillpresentlybegivingagraphicaccountoftheirpreviousdiscomforts(559 ff.).Earlier,backatArgos,Menelaos'nightshadbeenfilledwithvainandtantalizingdreamsofHelen,whoslipsthroughhisarms(424–5)aslightlyasshehadslippedthroughthepalacegateswhenshedepartedwithParis(407–8);whileanotherdesertedspouse,Klytaimestra,claimstohavelainawakecrying,persistentlydreamedofsomethingterrible(p.145) happeningtoherhusband,10andbeenawakenedbyanybuzzinggnat(887–94).WhenAgamemnonhasenteredthepalace,theEldersfinditimpossibletoshakeoffananxietythatrefusestobeputbehindthemlikeabaddream(980–3);ifitisadream,itisonefromwhichtheycannotwake.TheonlysleepinAgamemnonthatistrulypeacefulandunflawedisthesleepforwhichtheElderswillfinallypray:the‘endlesssleep’ofdeath(1448–51).

SotooinChoephoroi.Klytaimestra'sdreamwehavenoted.Orestes,ifhefailstoavengehisfather,ismenaced(amongotherthings)withghastlynightmaressentbytheErinyes

Page 3: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 3 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

thatwilldrivehimmad(Cho.288):11accordinglyhedesperatelyendeavourstoawakenhisfather'sspiritfromitssleepbelowtheearth(415,cf.315–19)—andapparentlyfails.12TheNurserecallshowOrestesasababywokeherwithhiscriesatallhours(751);hismotherontheotherhandremembershimsuckingherbreastincontenteddrowsiness.13

Choephoroiendswiththechorushopingagainsthopethatthecurseontheirmaster'shousemaynow‘fallasleepandcease’(1075–6).AtthebeginningofEumenides,however,wefindthatthecurse,nowembodiedintheErinyeswhoalsocallthemselvesArai‘Curses’(Eum.417),whileithasindeed,literallyandvisibly,fallenasleep,hascertainlynotceased;andthoughOrestesmayclaimthattheblood‐pollutiononhishandsis‘dormantandfading’(Eum.280),hispursuersarefarfromagreeing.

Inthelast750linesofthetrilogy,thethemeofsleepmakesonlyonefurtherappearance;andwhenitdoes,likemanyotherthemesinthelatterpartofEumenides,itistransformedfromasinistertheme(p.146) toanauspiciousone,14whenAthenadeclaresthatsheisfoundingthenewcounciloftheAreopagosas‘aguard‐postoftheland,watchfulonbehalfofsleepers’.15

ItisfromthisphrasethatIwanttobeginmymaininvestigation.Thewordsjustquoted,whichformtheconclusion16ofAthena'sspeechestablishingtheAreopagoscouncil,strike,onemightthink,asomewhatsurprisingnote.WhetheroneviewedtheAreopagosasacouncilwithakeyroleinthegovernmentofAthens,orasahomicidecourtandlittleelse,17therewouldseematfirstsighttobenoreasontosingleoutthesleepingcitizenastheobjectofitsspecialprotection.Moreover,thesameideawasexpressedinslightlydifferentform,withring‐compositionalsymmetry,atthebeginningofAthena'saccountofthecouncil's[3]function:ontheAreopagos,shesays,therespectandfearofthecitizenswillpreventwrongdoing‘bydayandnightalike’.18Whyallthisstressonnocturnalcrime?Andwhatkindofcrimeislikelytobemeant?

BeforeitswingswereclippedbyEphialtesin462/1,theAreopagoscouncilislikelytohavebeenmainlyconcerned,throughtheproceduresofeisangeliaandeuthynai,19withpoliticalmisdemeanoursandmalpracticesofvariouskinds—treason,bribery,embezzlementnodoubtprominentamongthem.20Suchcrimescouldofcoursebe(p.147) committedbynightaswellasbyday,buttherewouldbelittlereason,ingeneral,toattachanyspecificsignificancetothetimeatwhichtheywerecommitted,and—whatisperhapsmoreimportant—crimesofthiskindarenotafocusofinterestintheOresteia.WeshouldthinkratherofthefunctionwhichtheAreopagoscouncilperformsintheplayitself,andwhich,moreover,itperformedinrealityattheactualtimewhentheplaywasproduced,namelythetrialofchargesofhomicide.Inthecaseofhomicide,itiseasytoseewhythedistinctionbetweenday‐timeandnight‐timecrimecouldbefelttobeofconsiderablesignificance.21Atnight,especiallyunderancientconditionsoflittleornoartificiallighting,thekillerwillfinditeasiertolieinwaitunnoticed,easiertoavoidrecognitionbywitnesses,easiertoescape;often,too,hemayfindhisvictimasleepandtotallyhelpless.Thenocturnalkilleris,infact,bothhardertoguardagainstandharderto

Page 4: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 4 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

bringtobook,anditisthereforeintelligibleifheinspiredgreaterfear.

Iwillpresentlybesuggestingthatnocturnalkilling,andtheroleoftheAreopagoscouncilinconnectionwithit,mayhavebeenmattersofintensepublicconcernin459/8BCwhentheOresteiawasproduced.WhatIwanttotryandshownowisthatnocturnalkillingisamajorthemeoftheOresteiaitself.

InAgamemnontherearethreeepisodesofnocturnalkilling,twoactualandonehypothetical.Intheorderinwhichtheyarementionedintheplay,thefirstofthethreeisthebattleandmassacrethataccompaniedthecaptureofTroy,when‘friendlyNight’casthernetoverthecity'stowers‘sothatneitherthefull‐grownnoranyoftheyoungmightovertopit’(Ag.355–60)andlefttheTrojansnext(p.148) morninglamentingthedeathsoftheirdearestonesandtheirownenslavement(326–9).Thesecondisaneventthatisonlyanticipated.InthesongwhichbeganwiththeinvocationofthanksgivingtoNight(andZeus)partofwhichhasjustbeenquoted,thechoruseventuallyfindthemselvesreflectingonthegreatlossofGreeklifeintheten‐yearwar,andtheresentmentandangeragainsttheAtreidaiwhichisbuildingupinArgos(445–51,456–8);‘and’,theycontinue,‘Ihaveananxietythatwaitstohearofsomethinghappeningundercoverofnight’.22Theseareguardedwords,butwhentheyarefollowedbyreflectionsonthecertaintyofdivinevengeanceupon‘thosewhohavecausedthedeathsofmany’,onthehoundingbytheErinyesof‘himwhoisfortunatewithoutjustice’,onthethunderboltofZeuswhichstrikesthosewhoenjoy‘anexcessofgoodrenown’,andontheundesirabilityofbeingasackerofcities(461–72),thisconfirmswhattheaudiencehadprobablysuspectedalready,thattheElders'apprehensionisthatanattempt[4]maybemadetoassassinateAgamemnonorMenelaosorbothontheirreturn.23Itisstriking,andmaybesignificant,thatAeschylusmakesthemthinkofsuchadeedasanocturnalone.

ThethirdexampleofviolentdeathbynightinAgamemnonisthestormthatwreckedtheGreekfleetonitswayhome,withAgamemnon'sownshiptheonlyoneknowntohavesurvived.ItseemslikelythatinthecyclicNostoithestormwasmainlyadaytimeaffair.Whathappenedatnightwassomethingrelatedbutdistinct:thefleet,havingsufferedconsiderablelosses,wasstillatseaafterdark(havingpresumablybeenpreventedbythestormfromputtinginanywhere)andNauplios,seekingrevengeforthedeathofhissonPalamedes,luredthemtodestructionontheKaphereianrocksbylightingabeaconwhichtheytooktomarkaharbour.24Aeschylus,forwhom(p.149) itisimportantthatthestormshouldhavebeencausedbydivineanger(Ag.636,649),hasnouseforNaupliosandmakesnomentionofhim;butratherthanabandonthenocturnaldestructionforwhichinthetraditionalaccountNauplioswasresponsible,heextendsthestormitselfintothenight—orrather,hecontrivestogivetheimpressionthatalmostthewholeofittookplaceatnight.IntheHerald'stwenty‐one‐lineaccountofthestorm(Ag.650–70),nightfallcomesbetweenthethirdandfourthlines(cf.653ἐννυκτί).Uptothatpointtheaccounthasincludednodescriptivematerialexceptfortheonewordπυ̑ρ‘fire’(651);incontrast,theeightlinesthatfollow,narratingtheeventsofthenightandthefollowingmorning,includegraphicdescriptionofthewinds,waves,andrainsandofthe

Page 5: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 5 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

shipshelplesslycolliding,andend(658–60)withthesunriserevealingthewholeAegeandottedwithsparsandbodies.Therefollowsanevenlongersection(661–70)narratingtheescapeofAgamemnon'sship,alsoduringthenight,25andaddingfurthertouchestothehearer'spictureofthedisaster.26InAeschylus'presentationofevents,thenocturnaldestructionofthefleetservesasfitretributionforthenocturnalhavocandsacrilegewhichtheGreekshadwroughtatTroy;27butitalsoaddsanotherweightyitemtothegrowingtally(p.150) ofviolentdeathbynight.ThislistisfurtherextendedinChoephoroiinawaythatbringsthethemeofnocturnalkillingintocloserelationwiththatofsleep,inthestoryofSkyllaandNisos,toldbythechorusasoneoftheirexemplaoffemalecriminalityjustbeforeOrestesbeginstoputhisplanofrevengeintoaction(Cho.613–22).Astheytellthetale,Skylla,bribedbyMinos,cutoffthelockofimmortalityontheheadofherfatherNisoswhileheslept,28thusenablingMinos'Cretanstokillhim.

Allthesenocturnalkillingsare,ofcourse,outsidetheactionofthedramaproperlysocalled.Oneofthefourepisodesoccurredmanyyearspreviously;twoothersoccurfaraway,atTroyandatsearespectively;thefourthneveractuallyoccursatall.Thekillingsthathaveformedpartoftheactionthusfar—thoseofAgamemnonandCassandra—areundoubtedlyrepresentedastakingplaceduringthedaytime:29shortlybeforetheyhappen,CassandrapraystotheSun(Ag.1323),andsometimeafterwardsAigisthoshailsthe‘lightofthedaythatbringsrevenge’(1577).

[5]Butthereremainsonenocturnalkilling,orrathertwo,thatdoformpartoftheactionoftheOresteia,andcanindeedberegardedasitscentralevent,fullyjustifying,fromthedramaticpointofview,thefactthatinduecoursethecourtsetuptotryOresteswillbegivenaspecialremittopreventcrimeatnightandensurethesafetyof(p.151) citizenswhiletheysleep.IreferofcoursetothekillingofAigisthosandKlytaimestra.

Howcanweknowthatwearemeanttoenvisagethesekillingsastakingplaceatnight?

Thefirstindicationisgivenaconsiderabletimebeforethemurders,whenOrestesfirstapproachesthepalace.Askingtheslavewhoopensthedoortoreporttothemastersofthehousethatastrangerhasarrivedbringingimportantnewsfromabroad,hebidshimmakehastebecause‘thedarkchariotofNightisrapidlyapproaching’anditistimefortravellerstoseeklodging(Cho.660–2).Theimpressionthuscreatedatthebeginningofthescenethatitisnotlongbeforesunsetisconfirmed,inring‐compositionalfashion,towardsitsend,whenKlytaimestraassumesthatthesupposedPhokianshavebeenontheroadalldayanditisnowthepropertime(ὁκαιρός)forthemtoreceiveappropriatehospitality(710–11).

WhenOrestes,withPylades,hasgoneinside,thechorus,inprayingforhissuccess,invokeHermes(accordingtotheonemanuscript)as‘underworld’Hermesand‘nocturnal’Hermes(727–8χθόνιον…καὶ…νύχιον).HehasalreadybeenappealedtoundertheformertitlebothbyOrestesandbyElectra(1,124);butthelattertitleisnotonlynewintheplay,itisneverappliedtoHermesinanyothersurvivingtextofanysort,andhasnorelevancetothecurrentsituationunlessitistakentoimply—consistentlywithwhatwewillhavegatheredfromtheprecedingscene—thatthe‘contest’inwhich

Page 6: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 6 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

Hermesisbeingaskedtolendhisassistanceisgoingtobefoughtatnight.30

Aigisthosarrivesatthepalace,walksintoOrestes'trap,andiskilled.Directlythereafterwefindaservantshoutingfuriouslyforthe‘women'sdoors’,whichareapparentlybolted,tobeopened(877–9),andwhenatfirstthereisnoanswer,hecomplainsthateveryoneisasleep(881–2).Garvie31thinksthisshouldnotbetakenliterally,andEasterling(1993:20–1)pointsoutthatKlytaimestra(p.152) summonedAigisthosinordertodiscussthesituationwithhim(cf.672–3,716–18)andweshouldthereforenotexpecthertohavegonetosleepbuttobeawaitinghisarrival.However,sincetheideaofsummoningAigisthoswasfirstaired,Aeschylushasengineeredashiftinourassumptionsaboutwhatwillhappenwhenhecomes.After718thenotionofhisbeingwantedtodiscussmatterswithKlytaimestradoesnotappearagain.32Insteadwearegiventounderstandthathehasbeensummonedtothepalacetospeaktothevisitorsandheartheirstory‘manfromman’(736,850).WehearthisfromtheNurseassoonassheappears(734–7,cf.771),andwhenAigisthosarriveshemakesnomentionofKlytaimestraandlikewisethinksonlyofaninterviewwiththevisitors,asdothechorus(848–54).The‘active’Klytaimestrawho,toOrestes'surprise(cf.664–7)andprobablytothe[6]audience's,cametomeethimattheouterdoor,hasgivenplacetoa‘passive’Klytaimestrawhoremainswithinthewomen'squarters.Thesequarters,moreover,areboltedup,whichtheycertainlywerenotat668whenKlytaimestracametotheouterdooralmostbeforeOresteshadfinishedaskingthedoorkeepertofetchsomeoneinauthority;thechangesuggeststhatitisnownight‐time,whenthewomen'sdoorsmightwellbeboltedontheinsidefortheinmates'protection.Thedifficulty,too,whichtheservantexperiencesingettinganyresponsetohisfranticshoutingandknockingdoesstronglysuggestthatwearetosupposethatallthewomenofthehouseareindeednowasleep.33

IthereforeseeKlytaimestraasbeingherewakenedfromsleepforthesecondnightinsuccession;lastnightitwasbyaterrifyingdream(p.153) involvingasnakewhichrepresentedOrestes;thisnightitis,ineffect,byOresteshimself.

Againstthisinterpretationof877 ff.attentionhasnotunreasonablybeendrawnbyEasterling(1993:22–3)tothescenefollowingthemurder,inwhichOrestesdisplaystomenandgodsthebodiesofthe‘twintyrants’andthebloodstainedrobewhichKlytaimestrahadused,yearsbefore,totrapandslayAgamemnon.Evenif986,whereheappealstotheSuntobehiswitness,isspurious,ashasrecentlybeenarguedonindependentgrounds,34theemphasisofOrestes'speechissostronglyvisualthatweareclearlynotmeanttosupposethatthetimeisnight.

Inreplytothisonemightsimplyarguethatinancienttheatricalconditionsimaginarydarknesscouldeasilybeforgotten;35butonecansaymorethanthis.Itisdarknolonger.Thelight,asthechorussing,hasnowbecomevisible(961);thehouse,longprostrate,canriseup(963–4).AsatthebeginningofAgamemnonandasattheendofEumenides,‘thepeoplethatwalkedindarknesshaveseenagreatlight’.Andwhilethechoralode,sungbypalaceslaves,emphasizestheliberationofthehouse,Orestes,speakingtothe

Page 7: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 7 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

peopleofArgos(cf.1040πάνταςἈργείους),announcesthedeathofKlytaimestraandAigisthosastheliberationofthecityandonlyinthesecondplaceashisrevengeforhisfatherandhishouse(974–5).Thescenewhichcommenceswiththisdeclarationis,infact,anassemblyoftheArgivepeople,36whichwouldbegin,mostappropriately,atsunrise.37Thereisofcoursenodifficultyinsupposingthattheplay'sactionisthusspreadoverpartsoftwodays:Agamemnon—totakeonlythe(p.154) nearestexample—containsfirstthearrivalofthenewsofTroy'sfall,bybeacon,ontheverynightwhenithappens,andthenthearrivaloftheHerald,whohassailedfromTroywithAgamemnonthroughastormwhich,ashehimselfmakesclear,occupiedatleastpartofadayandthewholeofanight.

Thereis,then,nothingtopreventusfromconcluding,onthecumulativeevidenceoftheindicationsdiscussedearlier,thatthekillingofAigisthosandKlytaimestraisindeedtobeimaginedashappeningatnight.IcouldcontinuebytracingtheassociationofviolentdeathandnightonintoEumenides,whereitisembodiedintheErinyes,thosechildrenofNight38andavengersofmurderwhohoundtheirvictimstodeathandbeyond.39Iwishnow,though,toconsiderthe[7]possibilitythattheremaybeaconnectionbetweenthetwothemesoftheOresteiathatwehavebeenlookingat—thethemeofsleepandthethemeofnocturnalkilling—andarecenteventwhoseshock‐waveswerestillreverberatingthroughtheAthenianbodypolitic:thedeathofEphialtes,thefirstpoliticalassassinationthatAthenshadknownforhalfacentury,andthelastitwastoknowforanotherhalf‐century.40Fornotlongafterhehadintroducedandcarried,in462/1,legislationwhichdrasticallyreducedthepowersoftheAreopagosCouncil,Ephialteshadbeenmurderedinhissleep.Thatisanassertionwhichmaybethoughttorequiredocumentation,especiallysinceDavidStocktonhasargued41thatthereisnoproof,andnostrongreasontobelieve,thatEphialteswasmurderedatall.Iwillnowpresentthecaseforaverdictofunlawfulkilling.

ItwillbehelpfultocomparetheevidencewepossessaboutthedeathofEphialteswiththataboutthesuddendeathin129BCofScipioAemilianus,whichStocktoncitesasaparallelcase.Scipio'sdeathisoftencasuallyspokenofbylaterwriters(aboveallCicero)as(p.155) amurder,42butitisnowwidelybelievedthatitisatleastaslikelytohavebeennatural.43Inassessingthewitnesses,wemustdistinguishbetween,ontheonehand,merepassingreferencesbywriterswhogivenodetailsandsimplytakethemurderstory(oroneofthemurderstories)forgranted,and,ontheother,statementsevincingaseriousinterestinthefactsofthedeath.Ofsuchstatementstheresurvive,bymyreckoning,seven.44Innotoneoftheseisitstatedasafactthatthedeathwasmurder.SixaccountsstartbysayingScipiowas‘founddead’,theseventh45sayshe‘diedafterdinnerathome’;murder,suicide,andnaturaldeathareallcanvassedaspossibilities,invariouscombinations;46thosewhomentionmurderdifferastotheallegedmethod47andthelikelysuspects;48two49reportthediverseviewsofprevioushistorians(thoughwithoutnamingthem),andtheearliestofoursixauthors,Velleius,specificallystatesthatthe(p.156) majorityofhispredecessorshadregardedthedeathasnatural.Inthelightofallthis,evenifwehadnothadevidence50thatScipio'sownclosestfriend,attheclimaxoftheeulogyhecomposedforScipio'sfuneral,hadspokenof

Page 8: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 8 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

hisdeathasduetodisease,51wewouldstill,Ithink,havehadsufficientreasontobelievethatithadbeenso,andthatthevariousandinconsistenttalesoffoulplaywerepoliticallymotivatedrumour‐mongering.

WhatdowefindinthecaseofEphialtes?Wehavefoursourcesofsignificance,whichshouldprobablybereducedtothree,sincePlutarch52explicitlyreferstoAristotle53andoffersnoinformationindependentofthatsource;inadditiontoPlutarch,theothersourcesareAntiphon54andDiodoros.55EverysourcestatespositivelythatEphialteswasmurdered.AccordingtoDiodoroshewas‘doneawaywith’(ἀναιρεθείς)bynightand‘theendingofhislifewasobscure’(ἄδηλονἔσχετὴντου̑βίουτελευτήν).56TheAth.Pol.hasitthatEphialteswasdoneawaywith(thesameverb,ἀνῃρέθη)bybeingkilledinanunderhandmanner(δολοϕονηθείς)throughtheagencyof57AristodikosofTanagra.

[8]ThetestimonyofAntiphonisofparticularvalue.Hestandsnearertotheeventthaneitheroftheothersources.Hewasprobablyoldenoughtorememberithimself;58someofthejurorstryinghisclient,Euxitheos,fortheallegedmurderofHerodescertainlywere.(p.157) OfHerodesitwaseventruerthanofEphialtesthat‘theendingofhislifewasobscure’,forhisbodywasneverfound.Thedefendanthintsthathemightwellhavedrownedaccidentally,drawingattention59tothefactthathedisembarkedwhendrunkfromaboatthatwasridingatanchor,60andremarkingthathe‘wouldprobablyhavebeeninnoconditiontocontrolhismovements’.61AntiphondecidedtomentionthecaseofEphialtesasaparalleltothatofHerodes:itwouldhavebeeninhisclient'sintereststopointoutthatnobodycouldbesureEphialteshadbeenmurderedatall—andwemayaddthatAntiphonhimself,asanopponentofthedemocraticsystem,wouldhavehadpoliticalmotivesofhisownforpropagatingthatviewiftherewasanycredibilityinit.Hedoesnot.Allhesaysisthat‘thosewhokilledEphialteshavenevertothisdaybeendiscovered’;byitselfthismightjustpossiblybeunderstoodasawayofhintingthatnosuchpersonseverexisted,butsuchaninterpretationissurelyexcludedbyhisfurtherremarkthat‘thosewhokilledEphialtes’madenoattempttodisposeofthebody.FarfromsuggestingthatEphialtesmightnothavebeenmurdered,Antiphon,contrarytohisclient'sforensicinterestsandhisownpoliticalinterests,takesitforgrantedthathewas.Presumablytheknownfactslefthimnoalternative.

ItthusappearsthatthecircumstancesofEphialtes'deathweresuchastoruleoutanyexplanationotherthanmurder.Weknow,moreover,fromDiodoros,thathewaskilledatnight.Cananythingmorebeextractedfromtheinformationwearegiven?Antiphon'slanguageatfirstsightimpliesthatEphialteswasattackedwheninthe(p.158) companyofothers;itwouldhavebeenunfair,hesays,62todemandthat‘thosewhowerewithhim’(τοὺςσύνοντας)shouldbemadetoguess(εἰκάζειν)theidentityofhisassailantsonpainofbeingheldguiltythemselvesiftheycouldnot.Thismightsuggestasuddenattackoutofdoors(saywhenEphialteswasonthewayhomefromasymposium)withtheattackersescapingundercoverofthedarkness.63Inthosecircumstances,however,itwouldinfactnothavebeenatallunreasonabletosuspectEphialtes'companions:itwouldhavebeentheeasiestthingintheworld,iftheyhadbeentheguiltyparties,forthemtoinventaphantomgangofthugswhocommittedthemurderandthenconveniently

Page 9: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 9 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

vanished.AndAntiphonwouldhavewantedtostressthedistinctionbetweenthiscaseandhisclient's;‘andyet,’hecouldhavemadeEuxitheossay,‘itwouldhavebeenmuchmorereasonabletosuspectthemthanme,sincetheywereinEphialtes’companywhenhewasattacked,whereasHerodes,asIhavetoldyou,disembarkedalone'.Itismorelikely,therefore,thatτοὺςσύνονταςis,asitwere,animperfectparticiple,64meaningnot‘thosewhowerewithhim(sc.atthetimeofthemurder)’but‘thosewhohadbeenwithhim[sc.shortlybefore,asIhadbeenwithHerodes]’—or,aswemightputittoday,‘thelastpeopleknowntohaveseenhimalive’.Ifso,Ephialtes,likeHerodes,partedfromthesecompanionsaliveandwell—andhewasdeadbymorning,withunmistakableevidencethatthe[9]deathwasmurder:whichpointsstronglytotheconclusionthathewasfounddeadinbedwithstabwounds.65

Thequestionthatremainsis,ofcourse,whodunit.Thereappearsatfirsttobeaconflictofevidencehere.Antiphonspeaksofthekillersintheplural,andsaystheywereneverdiscovered;Diodorosalso,onthemostnaturalinterpretationofhiswords,speaksofthecrimeasneverhavingbeenclearedup.TheAth.Pol.,ontheotherhand,confidentlyassertsthatthemurderwasdonethroughtheagencyof(p.159) AristodikosofTanagra.Thereis,however,asPeterRhodesandothershaveseen,aneasywaytoreconciletheseaccounts:Aristodikos‘wasknowntobetheactualkillerbutitwasneverdiscoveredwhoseagenthewas’.66

ItisnotclearhowAristodikoscametobesuspected,thoughvariousscenariosareimaginable.Itislikely,however,thathewasneverbroughttotrial:assoonashegottoknowhewassuspectedhehadeveryreasontofleethecountry,particularlysinceasanon‐citizen,andinacaseofsuchpoliticalimportance,herantheriskofbeingquestionedundertortureifhestayed.67SuchflightbyasuspectwouldnodoubtbetakenbymostAtheniansasproofofguilt.Bethatasitmay,whatisclearisthatnooneelse,andinparticularnoAthenianorAthenians,everwentontrialforkillingEphialtes.

InmycommentaryonEumenides,68IdrewattentiontowhatIsawastheambiguityofoneofthepassagesinwhichtheAreopagoscouncilisassociatedwithprotectionagainstnocturnalcrime:

ἐνδὲτῳ̑σέβαςἀστω̑νϕόβοςτεξυγγενὴςτὸμὴἀδικειν̑σχήσειτότ᾽ἠ̑μαρκαὶκατ᾽εὐϕρόνηνὁμω̑ς

(p.160)Andinthisplacereverenceofthecitizensandinbornfearwillbearestraintfromdoingwrong,bothbydayandatnightalike. (690–2)

Thiscouldmean,Iargued,eitherthatrespectandfearoftheAreopagosbythecitizenswouldkeepthemfromdoingwrongbydayornight,oralternativelythatrespectandfearofthecitizenswouldkeeptheAreopagosfromdoingwrongbydayornight.Couldthisambiguity,andthroughitthewholenexusofideasthatwehaveexaminedrelatingto

Page 10: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 10 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

sleepandtonocturnalkilling,havesomethingtodowithpopularopinionsandsuspicionsaboutthedeathofEphialtes?Itwouldnot,atanyrate,beallthatsurprisingifmanyAtheniandemocratshadcometobelievethatthemenbehindEphialtes'deathweremembersoftheAreopagositself,takingrevengeforthewayEphialteshaddishonouredtheircouncilandriddenroughshodoveritstraditionalrightsandprivileges.69NowonderthissameAreopagos—itspowersclippedbutitscomposition,thusfar,essentiallyunchanged—hadneverconvictedanyoneofhismurder!HowfarwasitlivinguptotheidealsAthenaismadetosetforit?

[10]κερδω̑νἄθικτοντου̑τοβουλευτήριον,αἰδοιο̑ν,ὀξύθυμον,εὑδόντωνὕπερἐγρηγορὸςϕρούρημαγη̑ςκαθίσταμαι.(704–6)

Untouchedbythoughtofgainorofprivateinterest?Demandingordeservingreverence?Sharpinangeragainstallwrongdoers?Awakefulsentineloverthosewhosleep?Isuggestthatwordslikethese,thoughallwillhavetakenthemasafinestatementofwhattheAreopagoscouncilasahomicidetribunaloughttobe,werealsodesignedtobetakenbymanyspectatorsasastingingdefinitionofjustwhatthecurrentAreopagoscouncilwasnot.

Ihave,ofcourse,beenassumingthatthecontroversiesarousedbyEphialtes'enactments,andbyhismurder,werestilltopicalin459/8.Evenifwesupposethatthemurderoccurredin462/1veryshortlyafterthepassageofthelegislation,70somethreeyearsbeforethe(p.161) Oresteiawasproduced,Iseenoreasontobelievethatithadceasedtobetopical,andplentyofreasontobelievethatithadnot.Quiteapartfromthewell‐documentedtendencyofAthenianpoliticiansatalltimestorakeovertheembersofolddisputes,weknow71thatin458or457therewereAthenianswhowereprepared—asIsagoras,therivalofKleisthenes,hadbeenhalfacenturybefore—tocallinSpartainordertoensurethattheAthenianstatedidnotfalltoocompletelyintothehandsofthedemos.WeknowtoothatAeschyluswasalarmedenoughaboutthethreatofviolentcivilstrifetoincludeinthefinalportionofEumenidestwopassagescontainingexplicitwarningsagainstit.Iarguedinmycommentary,followingDodds,72thatoneofthese(858–66),whichhassometimesbeensuspectedofbeinginterpolated,wasinfactalast‐minuteadditionbyAeschylus;argumentsofsomeforcehavesincebeenbroughtforwardbyChristopherCarey73fortheviewthatitisnotaninsertionatallbutwascomposedatthesametimeasitscontext.Itremainstruethatthepassagewilldrawattentiontoitselfbyitsvividlanguageandthedisproportionatelengthofthespeechcontainingit(overhalfaslongagainasanyofAthena'sotherspeechesinthescene).Thelaterandundisputedpassageonthesamesubject(976–87),sungbythechorus,whiledifficultofinterpretationatsomepoints,undoubtedlymakesspecialreferencetothedangeroftit‐for‐tatkillings(980–3,esp.982ἀντιϕόνους).Sofarasweknow,nosuchkillingstookplace.Theprojectedcoupd'étatwasrenderedabortive,andintheTanagracampaign74theAtheniansandtheiralliesinflictedjustenoughdamageontheSpartan‐ledforcestodeterthemfromfurtheradventures.TwomonthslatertheAtheniansconqueredBoiotia—andalmostthefirstthingtheydidwasdemolishthewallsofTanagra.75Therewasagood

Page 11: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 11 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

strategicreasonforthis:TanagrawasthenearestBoiotiancity,exceptPlataia,totheAtticborder,andcouldmakeadangerousbaseinhostilehands.Politically,though,theAthenianswereguaranteeingthemselvestheenmityof(p.162) virtuallytheentireTanagraianpeople.Werethey,onewonders,alsomotivatedbythedesiretoavengetheactofAristodikosuponthecitytowhichhebelonged?

[11]Aboutthissametimetherewaswhatcanbeseenasaparallel,ifgentler,settlingofaccountsonthehomefront.Itwasin457thattheninearchonshipswereopenedtomembersofthethirdofthefourSolonianpropertyclasses.76Thetwotopclasses,consistingessentiallyofhorse‐owners,musthavebeensosmallthatwhilethearchonships,andmembershipoftheAreopagos,remainedconfinedtothem,<theywere>almostahereditaryprivilege.77Nolonger.Ofcourseintheshortrunthereformhadlittleeffectonthecompositionofthecouncil;butitdidmeanthatnomemberofitcouldhenceforthexpecthissontohavemorethanasmallchanceofjoiningorfollowinghiminitsranks.TheopponentsofEphialtesandPericlesnoweitherwithdrewfrompoliticsorsoughttowork,ratherthansubvert,thedemocraticsystem.Thestrugglewhichhadbegun,onemightsay,withtheostracismofThemistokles,andwhichhadbecomeacrisisin462/1,wasforthetimebeingatanend:astruggleofwhoselaterphasestheOresteiaisacontemporarydocument,andtoallintentsandpurposestheonlyonewehave.78

Addendap.145n.11 Iwouldnow,withH.L.Ahrens,regardCho.285asaninterpolation,probablyfromanotherAeschyleanplay.

p.148–9n.24 onthestormandshipwreckseenowMarshall(2003);Chapter17below;andmydiscussionofSophocles'NaupliosPyrkaeusinSommerstein,Clark,andTalboy(forthcoming).

Notes:

([11]1)Seee.g.Petrounias(1976:286–9);Macleod(1982:129);Sommerstein(1989b:220).

(2)Ag.12–17.

(3)Ag.179,275,290,337,346,420–6,491,559–62,565–6,597.

(4)Ag.887–94,980–3,1218,1247,1357,1448–51;Cho.32–41,285,288,315–19,495,523–52,613–22,670–1,751,882,897,1075–6;Eum.46–142,280,705–6.

(5)Cf.Thomson(1966:i.20).Thefactthatnosuchcryisincludedinthepoeticscriptoftheplaydoesnotprovethatnonewasutteredinperformance:cf.Eum.1043,1047(andseeSommerstein1989b:185–9ontheherald'sproclamationinEum.566 ff.).

(6)SeeSommerstein(1989b:220).

(7)Ag.14ϕόβοςγὰρἀνθ'ὕπνουπαραστατει.̑

Page 12: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 12 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

(8)ἔνθ'ὕπνῳcodd.(ἔνγ'ὕπνῳPage).

(9)ἀνθ'ὕπνουEmperius(adoptedinM.L.West'sTeubnertext(West1990a).

(10)Theaudience,betterinformedthanAgamemnon,areleftfreetospeculatewhetherthesedreams,likesomuchelseinKlytaimestra'sspeechofwelcome,areentirelyfictitious,orwhethershedidindeeddreamaboutAgamemnon'sdeath,not,asshepretends,throughfearfulanxietybutthroughpleasurableanticipation!

(11)Thedifficultline285mayalsodescribeanightmare‐vision;onthetextandinterpretationofthispassageseeGarvie(1986:116).*

[12](12)IhavearguedinSommerstein(1980b:67–9)thatin479–96OrestesandElectraareattemptingwithoutsuccesstoraiseuptheirfather'sghosttogivethemadvice,encouragement,andblessing.

(13)Thereis,ofcourse,noinconsistencyhere;Klytaimestra,likeupper‐classmothersinallages,isassumedtohaveonlyhadthebabywithherwhenhewasbehavingnicely(Clark1985:79:‘didanyoneseriouslyexpectthequeenofArgostotacklethenightfeedsandthenappywash?’)

(14)SeeLebeck(1971:131–3);Sommerstein(1989b:220and304(indexs.v.‘themesofplayandtrilogy…ominousthemestransformedintoauspiciousones’)).

(15)Eum.705–6εὑδόντωνὕπερ|ἐγρηγορὸςϕρούρημαγη̑ς.

(16)Thefollowingfourlines(707–10)arenotpartofthefoundation‐speechproper;theyareatransitionbacktodealingwiththecasecurrentlybeingtried,endingwithaninstructiontothejudgestocasttheirvotes.

(17)Onthequestionwhichoftheseviews,ifeither,isimplicitlypromotedbyEumenides,seeSommerstein(1989b:216–18).

(18)Eum.690–2ἐνδὲτῳ̑σέβας|ἀστω̑νϕόβοςτεξυγγενὴςτὸμὴἀδικειν̑|σχήσειτότ'ἠ̑μαρκαὶκατ'εὐϕρόνηνὁμω̑ς.Onthepossibleambiguityofthissentenceseepp.159–60.

(19)EisangeliatotheAreopagoshadbeenintroducedbySolon(Arist.Ath.Pol.8.4).OnthepossibleresponsibilityoftheAreopagosforeuthynai(theauditofoutgoingmagistrates),notdirectlyattestedinancientsources,seeRhodes(1981:316–18);L.A.Jones(1987:59);Carawan(1987);contra(verytersely),Wallace(1989:80).

(20)Inthefourthcentury,atanyrate,themainformsofeisangeliawere(1)totheAssembly,fortreasonorcorruptiononly(Hyp.Eux.7–8)and(2)totheCouncil(ofFiveHundred)formisconductbyamagistrate(Arist.Ath.Pol.45.2)includingembezzlement(Ant.6.35);whileineuthynaithetwomostseriouschargesthatcouldbebroughtwereembezzlementandbribery(punishedwithafineoftentimestheamountofmoneyinvolved,asagainstapenaltyofsimpleordoubledamagesforotheroffences:Arist.

Page 13: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 13 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

Ath.Pol.54.2).SeeHansen(1991:212–18,221–4).Thereissomespecific,thoughindirect,evidencethattrialsfortheseoffencestookplaceontheAreopagosbefore462:Themistokleswasprosecuted(andcondemnedinhisabsence)fortreasonbyeisangelia(KraterosFGrH342F11),andthechargeofcorruptionagainstKimonaftertheThasosexpeditionaroseoutofhiseuthynai(Arist.Ath.Pol.27.1withPlut.Kim.14.2–15.1).SeeRhodes(1981:319–20,335–6);Bauman(1990:22–31).

(21)Justasitwasinthecaseoftheft,withwhichtheAreopagoswasnotdirectlyconcerned:anyonecaughtstealingatnight,nomatterhowsmallthetheft,couldbekilledifnecessarytostophimgettingaway,andhiskillerincurrednopenalty(Dem.24.113).

(22)Ag.459–60μένειδ'ἀκου̑σαίτίμοιμέριμνανυκτηρεϕές.

[13](23)Theyareright:suchanattemptwillindeedbemade.Theyareevenrightaboutthemotive:angeroverthedeathofalovedoneinAgamemnon'sandMenelaos'war.Wheretheyarewrong—disastrouslyand,asCassandrawillfind,incorrigiblywrong—isinbelievingthatthedangercomesfromthecitizens(cf.809)wheninfactitcomesfromwithinthepalace.

(24)OurevidenceforthenarrativeoftheNostoicomespartlyfromProklos'synopsisofthepoem(EGFp.67Davies<=NostoiArg.§3West>),andpartlyfromlatermythographicaccountswhichseemtoderivefromit([Apollod.]Epit.6.5–11;HyginusFab.116).Proklos'summaryseemstoimplytwoseparatestorms,one‘intheopensea’inwhichMenelaoslostallbutfiveofhisships,another‘neartheKapheridrocks’inwhichAiassonofOileusperished.Thelateraccountshavemuchmoretosayaboutthelatterstorm.Accordingto<ps.‐>Apollodorositbegan‘offTenos’(thenextislandbutonesouth‐eastofEuboiaintheCycladeschain),andafterthedeathofAias‘theotherswereblowntowardsEuboiaduringthenight,andNauplioslitabeacononMountKaphereus’whichcausedthewreckofthefleet.HyginusplacesthewholeofthisdisasterclosetoEuboia,butlike<ps.‐>ApollodorosheimplicitlyassociatesthestormitselfwiththedaytimebymakinghisfirstmentionofnightatthebeginningofhisaccountofNauplios'treachery:‘tempestateetflatibusadversisadsaxaCaphereanaufragiumfecerunt,inquatempestateAiaxLocrusfulmineestaMinervaictus…;ceterinoctucumfidemdeorumimplorarent,Naupliusaudivit…’.Proklos'summaryoftheNostoisaysnothingaboutNauplios,butweknowthatheandPalamedeswerementionedinthepoem(fr.1Davies<=11West>),andpaceDavies(1989:83)thereisnoreasontodoubtthathisroleinitwasessentiallythesameasitwasinlateraccountsofthesameevents.*

(25)Itwasonlywiththecomingofdaythatthemenknewtheyweresafe(667–8).

(26)Notablythedrivingofshipsagainsttherock‐boundcoast(666).

(27)TheconnectionwasmadebyKlytaimestrain338–44(‘iftheyrespectthecitygodsoftheconqueredlandandtheplaceswheretheydwell,thentheconquerorswillnotbeconqueredintheirturn…fortheyhaveyettosecureasafereturnhome’).TheexplicitreferencetothedestructionofsanctuariesandaltarsmadelaterbytheHerald(527)is

Page 14: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 14 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

undersuspicionofbeinganinterpolation(thelatesteditor,West1990a,acceptsthedeletionfirstproposedbyG.G.Salzmann),butitwasinanycasenotoriousthatthesackofTroyinvolvedgrossdesecrationsofaltarsandtemples,notablyinthekillingofPriamandtheseizureofCassandra,andalreadybeforeHomer(cf.Od.1.325–7,3.132–5;seeS.R.WestinHeubeck,West,andHainsworth1988:116)divinewrathatthesewastheacceptedexplanationofthestormthatoverwhelmedthereturningfleet.

(28)Cho.621πνέονθ'…ὕπνῳ.Tobesure,asEasterling(1993:19)hasnoted,thereisnoexplicitreferencetonight;butwhilethesiestawasnodoubtaregularfeatureofGreeklifeinantiquityasnow(itisindeedreferredtobythedown‐to‐earthHeraldinAg.565–6μεσημβριναις̑κοίταις,alongwithcrowdedships,dampbivouacs,andubiquitouslice),IknowofnocaseofacharacterinGreekheroiclegendsufferingthefateofHamlet'sfather,andwecansafelyassumethatintheabsenceofexplicitindicationtothecontrary,‘killinginsleep’wouldautomaticallybetakentoimply‘killingbynight’.

(29)AsofcoursedidthesacrificeofIphigeneia,andalso,itwouldappear,thekillingandeatingofThyestes'children(cf.Ag.1592κρεουργὸνἠ̑μαρ).

[14](30) West(1990a),indeed,followingasuggestionbyBlaydes,makesthisexplicitbyemendingthesuspecttransmittedreadingκαὶτὸννύχιονtoκαιρὸςνυχίοις(τοισ̑δ'ἐϕεδρευ̑σαιξιϕοδηλήτοισινἀγω̑σιν).Thismaywellberight(thoughWesthimselfinhisStudiesinAeschylus[West1990b:251]speaksofitonlyas‘tempting’),butIneitherwishnorneedtorelyonit.

(31)Garvie(1986)adloc.

(32)Indeed,giventhatonesceneendswithKlytaimestrasayingshewilldiscussthesituationwithAigisthos(andgivingtheimpressionexsilentiothatheisinthehouse),andthatthenextscenebeginswiththeNurseleavingthehousetofetchAigisthosforaquitedifferentpurpose,wemaywellbemeanttodeducethatwhatKlytaimestrasaidtothesupposedPhokianswasamereblind,likesomeotheraspectsofherspeechanddemeanourinthatscene(cf.737–40).

(33)OneistemptedtoreferheretoavasepaintingdepictingthedeathofAigisthos(seePrag1985pl.12c–d,no.C19[AegisthusPainter,c.470])inwhichKlytaimestraisshownrunninguptodefendhimwithdisorderedhairsuchasnoqueen,surely,wouldeverhaveunlessjustrousedfrombed.Inanotherpaintingofthesameperiod(Prag1985pl.16b+17,no.C22(BerlinPainter,470–65))Klytaimestra'shairseemstohavebeendoneupinahurry,foronelockhasescapedandishangingdown.

(34)West(1990b:262–3),adoptingasuggestionbyW.S.Barrett.If986isdeleted,thewitnesstowhomOrestesappealswillbeZeustheFather(984–5).

(35)Cf.Garvie(1986:322);MacDowell(1971:19).

(36)Itdoesnotfollowthattherewasastage‐crowdtorepresentthem.Orestesmaywellhavespokenstraightattheaudience,ineffectconscriptingthemintotheroleofthe

Page 15: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 15 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

Argivepeople(cf.Whallon1980:90;Hogan1984:142;and,foraparallelsituationinEum.566 ff.,Sommerstein1989b:186).Garvie(1986:316–17)thinksthatOrestes‘addressestheChorusthroughout,astheconventionalrepresentativesofArgos[;t]hefactthattheyaretechnicallyslave‐womenisforgotten’;butitwouldbeimpossibleinproductiontoignorethegenderofthechorusasmanifestedbytheirmasksandcostumes,whichwouldmakethemanutterlyinappropriateaudienceforaspeechaddressedtothepeopleoftheArgivepolis.

(37)AsAthenianassembliesdid(seeAr.Ach.19–20,Thesm.376,Eccl.84–5).

(38)Eum.322–3,416,745,793,844,1033.

(39)Ibid.174–8,264–75,339–40.

(40)ThemostrecentassassinationbeforethatofEphialteshadbeenthekillingofHipparchosbyHarmodiosandAristogeitonin514;afterEphialtestherewerenomoreuntilAndrokleswasmurderedbyoligarchsintherun‐uptothecoupd'étatof411(Thuc.8.65.2).

(41)Stockton(1982).

(42)Cic.proMil.16;deAmic.41;deFato18;Rep.6.12;Att.10.8.7;cf.alsoe.g.Val.Max.8.15.4morsclandestinisinlatainsidiis.PompeyintheSenateon9February56BC,whenhedeclaredsemunitioremadcustodiendamvitamsuamforequamAfricanusfuisset,quemC.Carbointeremisset(Cic.adQF2.3.3),evidentlytookitforgrantedthatmostofhishearerswouldregardthemurderasawell‐known‘fact’.

[15](43)ThecasefornaturaldeathwasmoststronglyarguedbyCarcopino([1928]1967:85–127);anditisnowpossibleforawriterlikeCrawford(1981:114)toassertwithoutargumentthatScipio‘diedofdisease’.Scipio'sbiographer,A.E.Astin(1967:241),isnon‐committal,hinting,withLast(1932:45),thatScipio'sfriendsmayhavethoughtitpoliticallyadvisableatthetimetotreathisdeathasnatural,butconcluding,asLasthad,thatthefactscannolongerbeestablished.

(44)LivyPer.59;Velleius2.4.6;Plut.Rom.27.5andC.Gr.10.5–6(whichhaveinconsistentdetailsandmustderivefromdifferentsources);AppianBC1.20;[Aur.Vict.]deVir.Ill.58.10;Orosius5.10.9–10.

(45)Plut.Rom.27.5.

(46)Murderismentionedasapossibilityinallsevenaccounts;suicidebyPlutarchinRomulusandbyAppian;naturaldeathbyPlutarchinRomulus(again)andbyVelleius.

(47)PlutarchinGaiusGracchus,alone,claimsthereweremarksofviolenceonthebody;inRomulus,however,hereportsthatthosewhobelieveinamurdersayitwasbystrangulation,andthisalsoseemstobetheimplicationofpseudo‐AureliusVictor'sstatementthatScipiowasfoundobvolutocapite,nelivorinoreappareret.

Page 16: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 16 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

(48)Livy'sepitomator,andOrosius(whomaylikewisedependonLivy),saythatSemproniawassuspected;PlutarchinGaiusGracchus,however,claimsthatsuspicionfellonGaiusGracchusandFulviusFlaccus.Tenyearsaftertheevent,C.PapiriusCarbowasaccusedofcomplicity(P.Africaninecissociusfuisti)whenbeingprosecutedonotherchargesbyL.Crassus(Cic.deOr.2.170);twogenerationslater,CiceromentionsCarbo'sresponsibilityforthedeathasawidespreadbelief(Fam.9.21.3),whilePompey,aswehaveseen(n.42),asserteditasafact.

(49)Viz.Velleius,andPlutarchinRomulus.

(50)Laeliusfr.22Malcovati4eomorbo†rumtemovit(mortemobitOrelli,Stangl;seeMalcovati1975).Cf.alsoLucilius1093Marxinsperatoabiit,quemunaanginasustulithora.

(51)Cicero,however,ispreparedtomakeLaeliusimplicitlyaccusethefamilyandfriendsofTiberiusGracchusofresponsibilityforScipio'sdeath(deAmic.41),thoughearlierinthedialogue(§12)hespeaksonlyof‘whatmensuspect’.

(52)Plut.Per.10.8.

(53)MeaningAth.Pol.25.4.

(54)Ant.5.68.

(55)D.S.11.77.6.

(56)ThehandlingofboththeseexpressionsbyStockton(1982)isunsatisfactory.Herendersthefirstas‘died’,withoutofferinganyevidencethatἀναιρεισ̑θαιcaneverbeusedofanaturaldeath;thesecondheparaphrasesas‘nobodyknewhowhislifeended’whentheGreekexpressionisequallycapableofmeaningthatnobodyknewwhowasresponsibleforhisdeath.

(57)Theprepositionusedisδιά,andPlutarchrightlyunderstoodtheauthortohavebeenassertingthatAristodikoswasactingonbehalfofothers.

[16](58)Accordingto[Plut.]LivesoftheTenOrators832fhewasborn‘atthetimeofthePersianwars’andwasslightlyyoungerthanGorgias(whoseacceptedbirth‐datewas484–481(cf.ApollodorosFGrH244F33withJacoby'snote)).Abirth‐datenotlongafter480issupportedbytheallegationlatermadeagainstAntiphon(Ant.fr.1Thalheim)thathisgrandfatherhadbeenaspearman(δορυϕόρος)inthePeisistratids'bodyguard(andthereforepresumablybornnolaterthan535–530,sinceHippiaswasexpelledin510).Itistruethatnocontemporaryornear‐contemporarysourcereferstoAntiphoninacontextearlierthanthe420s;butthismaybeexplainedbythegeneralscantinessofliteraryevidenceforthe440sand430s(especiallycomedy),byAntiphon'sunwillingnesstoengageinpublicpoliticalactivitysuchasmighthaveputhisnameintheinscriptionalrecord,andbytheprobabilitythatitwasonlyinthe420sthathebeganthenovelpracticeofputtingcopiesofspeechesintopubliccirculation.

Page 17: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 17 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

(59)Ant.5.26.

(60)Ibid.5.21ὥρμει.

(61)Trans.M.Edwards(inUsherandEdwards1985).

(62)Ant.5.68.

(63)AsJohnRichobservedindiscussion<attheNottinghamSeminar>.

(64)SeeKühnerandGerth(1898–1904:i.200Anm.9).

(65)ThecontraryconclusionofStockton(1982)that‘hisbodyborenoobviousmarksofphysicalviolence’isbasedonwhatwehaveseen(p.156withn.56)tobeanoverconfidentinterpretationofanambiguousexpressioninDiodoros.IdonotunderstandStockton'sclaimthattheevidenceofAntiphonsupportshisview.

(66)Rhodes(1981:322)—thoughhementionsthissolutiononlyasoneoftwopossibilities,theotherbeingthatAristodikos'responsibilitywas‘arumourthatwasnotsubstantiated’whichtheauthororhissourcehasreportedasfact.InconnectionwithAristodikos,the‘manfromBoeotia…presumedtobetheagentofanAtheniancitizen’(Rhodesloc.cit.),oneistemptedtorecalltheforeignrobberswhoweresupposedtohavekilledLaios(Soph.OT122–3,cf.715–16),whoOedipusinstantlyinfers(ibid.124–5)musthavebeeninthepayofsomeThebanenemyorenemiesoftheking,asindeedhadbeensuspectedatthetime(ibid.126).

(67)Forthetortureoffreenon‐citizens,seeLys.13.54,59;Dem.18.133(cf.Dein.1.63);Aischines3.223–4(cf.Dem.18.137);Antiphanesfr.274KA(‘amanonlyhastoshipinaconsignmentofpepper,andsomeoneputsdownamotionforhimtobetorturedasaspy’).ItwascarriedoutwhenorderedbytheAssemblyincaseswherethesecurityofthestatewasbelievedtobeunderthreat.Itmayalso(butthisisdisputed)havebeenpossibleforfreenon‐citizenstobeexaminedundertortureincasesofhomicideandwounding.SeeLipsius(1905–15:894–5);Thür(1977:18–19);Carey(1988).The‘decreeofthearchonshipofSkamandrios’(And.1.43)onlyappliedtocitizens(cf.Lys.13.27).

(68)Sommerstein(1989b)onEum.690–2.

(69)IamusingthissortoflanguagebecauseitisscatteredallovertheOresteia;seeSommerstein(1989b)onEum.95,110,150,780.

[17](70)TheonlyevidenceforthedateofEphialtes'deathisthestatementoftheAth.Pol.thatitoccurred‘notlong’afterhisreformswerecarried.

(71)Thuc.1.107.4–6.

(72)Dodds(1960:23–4=1973:51–2).

(73)Carey(1990).

Page 18: Sleeping Safe in Our Beds Stasis Assassination and the Oresteia

Sleeping safe in our beds: stasis, assassination, and the Oresteia

Page 18 of 18

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: University ofOxford; date: 02 May 2015

(74)Thuc.1.107.5–108.2.

(75)Thuc.1.108.3.

(76)Thezeugitai,Arist.Ath.Pol.26.2.

(77)WhentheAtheniancavalrywasfirstestablished,sometimeinthemidfifthcentury,itwasonly300strong(And.3.5).Notallcitizensofmilitaryageandappropriatewealthcanhaveactuallyservedinthecavalry;somewouldhaveconflictingresponsibilities(e.g.asgenerals,taxiarchs,ortrierarchs)andsomewouldbeunfitforservice.MakinggenerousallowanceforthesewemightassumethatinEphialtes'timethereweresome750pentakosiomedimnoiandhippēsaged20–49.OnthepopulationmodelemployedbyHansen(1985:12),thiswouldimplythat25–30menintheseclassesreachedtheageof30annuallyandsojoinedthepoolofpotentialarchons.Someofthesewouldbedisqualifiedforofficebyreasonofcrime,publicdebt,scandalouslife‐style,etc.,soitmaywellbethatanypentakosiomedimnosorhippeuswhowasqualifiedhadclosetoa50–50chanceofeventuallygainingaseatontheAreopagoscouncil.

(78)ThischapterwasfirstpublishedinJ.H.Molyneux(ed.),LiteraryResponsestoCivilDiscord(=NottinghamClassicalLiteratureStudies1)(Nottingham:UniversityofNottingham,1992)1–17.IwishtothankallwhocontributedtothediscussionofthispaperatandaftertheNottinghamseminaron20May1992<whenitwasoriginallypresented>,especiallyPaulCartledge,JohnRich,andmyrespondent,PatEasterling.

Accessbroughttoyouby: UniversityofOxford