Upload
augusta-stevens
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sjoerd Schenau
Developing new statistics for climate change analysis
Content
• Organisational setting Climate change statistics in the Netherlands
• New statistics for climate change Footprint analysis
• Conclusions
2
Organisational setting
3
Environmental
Statistics
SEEA System of
Environmental-Economic Accounting
Emission Register
(70 experts from 10 institutes,
including Statistics Netherlands)
Statistics Netherlands (CBS)
shari
ng
mic
rodata
sharin
g
micro
data
Dissemination
Official statistics at www.cbs.nl
Emission data at www.prtr.nl
Policy indicators at Environmental Data Compendium, e.g., www.compendiumvoordeleefomgeving.nl/indicatoren/en0165-Greenhouse-gas-emissions.html?i=41-205
New statistics for climate change
• Quarterly CO2 emissions
• CO2 emission permits• Mitigation expenditure• Carbon footprint
4
New statistics for climate change
• Quarterly CO2 emissions
• CO2 emission permits• Mitigation expenditure• Carbon footprint
5
Changes in CO2 emissions, second quarter of 2015
Source data:• Monthly energy data• National accounts
data• Other
New statistics for climate change
• Quarterly CO2 emissions
• CO2 emission permits• Mitigation expenditure• Carbon footprint
6
20052006200720082009201020110
20
40
60
80
100
Allocated CO2 allowancesExcess CO2 allowancesShortfall CO2 allowances
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 2009 2010 2011---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Opening stock 1 January 86.087.847 87.856.973 100.974.058 111.941.342 2 Allocated free of charge (grandfathered) 76.801.532 83.703.076 84.974.375 88.831.673
3 Purchased - permits (allowances) 168.951.989 191.515.413 170.119.571 161.845.444
Of which free permits 2) 117.438.701 119.167.730 113.375.936 113.861.496
Of which non-free permits 3) 4.000.000 -
Of which from ROW 4) 51.513.288 72.347.683 52.743.635 47.983.948
4 Purchased - credits 58.791.531 50.333.828 48.028.922 79.229.517
Of which purchased 30.841.275 25.789.984 25.822.587 43.313.696
Of which from domestic projects - - - -
Of which from ROW 27.950.256 24.543.844 22.206.335 35.915.821
5 Sold - permits (allowances) 180.136.186 178.637.082 173.362.339 156.197.411
Of which free and non-free permits 5)127.074.283 108.276.031 113.609.251 108.641.695
Of which to ROW 4) 53.061.903 70.361.051 59.753.088 47.555.716
6 Sold - credits 31.525.560 46.462.897 40.534.779 49.640.885
Of which to other residents 16.539.418 23.754.984 22.524.463 27.528.136
Of which to ROW 14.986.142 22.707.913 18.010.316 22.112.749
7 Losses (cancelled permits) 6) - 20 - 63.633
8 Surrendered, permits, credits, etc. 79.698.681 83.512.670 81.071.420 84.616.050
9 Closing stock 87.856.973 100.974.058 111.941.822 137.098.673 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mton CO2
Emission permit database Dutch emission authority
http://www.emissieautoriteit.nl/
New statistics for climate change
• Quarterly CO2 emissions
• CO2 emission permits• Mitigation expenditure• Carbon footprint
720
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
140.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Mitigation expenditure government, percentage of GDP
• Government reports• Government
statistics• Environmental
expenditure accounts
More info:http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/natuur-milieu/publicaties/milieurekeningen/publicaties/archief/2012/environmental-accounts-2011-pub.htm
New statistics for climate change
• Quarterly CO2 emissions
• CO2 emission permits• Mitigation expenditure• Carbon footprint
8
Consumption and production based CO2 emissions, 2009
More info:http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/natuur-milieu/publicaties/milieurekeningen/publicaties/archief/2013/2012-environmental-accounts-of-the-netherlands-2011-pub.htm
Footprint analysis
• Footprints are increasingly based on IO/SEEA combinations• Variety of Multi-regional input-output models (MRIO)• Footprint estimates vary significantly
Question:What role should NSI’s play in footprint analysis?
Answer?Single-country National Accounts Consistent (SNAC)footprint
9
Statistical community
• Many different NSI’s and international organisations active in footprint calculations
• There is wide range of methods being usedNSIs often use simpler models
• Mostly carbon footprint• Clear interest in additional breakdowns
Household characteristics such as income• Dissemination practices of the institutes show that the
results are not always presented as “official statistics”
10
Overview of MRIO databases that are currently publically available
GTAP EXIOBASE WIOD EoraAcronym Global Trade
Analysis Project
EXIOPOL: Externality data and input-output tools for policy analysis
World Input-Output Database
-
Institute Purdue University EXIOBASE: FP6 project (EXIOPOL) led by FEEM Database created by NTNU, TNO, SERI, CML
FP7 project lead by the University of Groningen
University of Sydney
Years 1990, 1992, 1995, 1997, 2001, 2004, 2007 (years are not comparable)
2000 1995-2011 1990-2009
Prices of previous year
- - 1995-2009 -
Countries/Regions
15-129 (depends on year)
43(27 EU, 16 non-EU)(95% of the global GDP)
40(27 EU and 12 non-EU)(80% of world GDP in 2006)
187
Number of industries
57 industries 130 industries 35 industries 100-500 industries
Environmental data
Greenhouse gases (CO2, NO2, CH4)Energy useLand use (split agro-ecological zone)
Emissions (56)Materials (96)Land use (15)Water use (14)
Energy use / several energy carriersWater consumptionLand useEmissions of greenhouse gasesAir pollutantsResource use/extractionGeneration and treatment of various types of waste
Greenhouse gasesAir pollutionWater useEcological Footprint
11
Academic work
– Difference between MRIOs:‐ Aggregation (industries and/or countries)‐ Construction method: IO based, SUT based, or trade
based‐ Assumptions RoW or ITMs‐ Emission data (modeled or not)
– Aim of MRIOs‐ Information about global developments‐ No claim to be 100% correct at national level‐ Focus on consistent method (rather than best country
data)12
Carbon footprints for the Netherlands from various MRIO databases
13
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 20100
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
PNAS NCC ESSD EORA GRAM WIOD OECD
Mton CO2
Data provided by Glen Peters and Nori Yamano
Year on year change in the DutchCarbon footprint: WIOD and EORA
14
Reconciling academic and statistical work
– Growing policy interest in footprints, but no clear answers– MRIOs have set the standard, but outside NSIs capabilities
• Labour intensive• Assumptions
– MRIOs vs. official statistics• Always inconsistent due to integration/balancing
required:• Trade asymmetries
– Can we reconcile statistical and academic work in area of footprint analysis?
15
A SNAC footprint
– Produce a footprint, based on MRIO, that is consistent to official statistics of the Netherlands ‐ Single-country National Accounts consistent (SNAC)
– Main approach: “Adjust WIOD to be consistent to Dutch data”
– Why WIOD?‐ Transparancy‐ Time series availibility
– Gain insight why results could be so different
16
SNAC-Method for the Netherlands
– Follow WIOD procedure, but - with impoved data
• Trade in goods: re exports microdata‐• Trade in services: Confidential data• Expand SUT from 35 to 72 industries (+official valuation
layers)• Official SEEA accounts
- …..and keeping the Dutch data fixed
17
Results: SNAC vs. WIOD
18
Overall difference in footprint: 4%Mainly due to lower foreign emissionsNL becomes net exporter of emissions
2009SNAC-footprint WIODMtCO2 MtCO2 %
Total Footprint 202 210 -4%
Domestic indirect emissions
80 71 11%
Domestic direct emissions
40 39 5%
Total Domestic 120 109 9%
Total Foreign 83 101-22%
Resident emissions 205
Carbon footprint per capita including various estimates for the Netherlands
19
Source: CBS 2013
Import emissions allocated to country of origin, 2009
20
Indirect carbon footprint (2009) allocated to consumption categories
21
Conclusions
1. MRIOs are produced for global questions while a SNAC footprint is more relevant for national policy makers
2. SNAC makes a difference! (at least for the Netherlands)3. Need for IO and SEEA data4. Need for enhanced cooperation
‐ Between statistical offices ‐ Between MRIO producers ‐ Statistical and academic community
22