sizing_up

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    1/10

    Jordi Planas

    1

    18/02/2011

    Sizing Up the UncultivatedMajority

    A case for Problem Based Learning I

    Jordi Planas

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    2/10

    Jordi Planas

    Sizing Up the Uncultivated MajorityA case for Problem Based Learning I

    Background presentation

    Biological nitrogen fixation, the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia for biosynthesis, is

    exclusively performed by a few bacteria and archaea. Despite the essential importance of biological

    nitrogen fixation, it has been impossible to quantify the incorporation of nitrogen by individual

    bacteria or to map the fate of fixed nitrogen in host cells.Coupling the identity of microbes with their

    activity in the environment remains an important gap in our ability to explore microbial ecology. Thedevelopment of techniques to quantify the metabolic activity of single microbial cells has been

    especially challenging, mostly due to their small size.

    Bacteria and archaea responsible for biological nitrogen fixation can be found in free-living form or in

    symbiosis with algae, higher plants, and some animals. Although these microbes are a critical part of

    the global nitrogen cycle, there has previously been no means to evaluate this fixation process at

    subcellular resolution.

    Wood and woody plant materials are abundant in the biosphereand are important nutrient sources for

    a variety of fungi and microorganisms. Yet few animals are ableto feed primarily on wood. Although

    rich in carbon, wood typically contains two orders of magnitude less nitrogen per unit of carbon than

    does animal tissue. Animals using wood as food must therefore obtain other sources of combined

    nitrogen for biosynthesis. For example, wood-eating termites are thought to supplement their diet with

    nitrogenous compounds produced by nitrogen-fixing bacteria inhabiting their gut. This conclusion is

    supported by observations that a variety of nitrogen-fixing bacteria have been cultivated from termite

    guts or detected by culture-independent methods, and that substantial rates of nitrogen fixation have

    been measured in association with termite guts and intact termite colonies. Direct measurement of

    nitrogen fixation by individual bacteria and of nitrogen use by host cells, however, has remained

    impossible. Nitrogen fixation has also been detected in intact specimens of wood-eating marine

    bivalves of the family Teredinidae (commonly known as shipworms), but the site of fixation and the

    identity of the nitrogen-fixing microorganisms have not been previously determined. Although

    conspicuous communities of nitrogen-fixing bacteria have not been found in the gut of shipworms, as

    they have in termites, dense populations of intracellular bacterial symbionts have been observed incells (bacteriocytes) in a region of shipworm gills known as the gland of Deshayes. Moreover, a

    bacterium(Teredinibacterturnerae) capable of fixing nitrogen gas in pure culture has been isolated

    from the gills of numerous shipworm species, and its presence in the gill symbiont community of the

    shipworm Lyroduspedicellatushas been confirmed by in situ hybridization and quantitative

    polymerase chain reaction analysis. These observations raise the questions of whether bacterial

    symbionts within the gills ofL. pedicellatuscan fix nitrogen and whether this fixed nitrogen is

    supplied to the host.

    Main background ideas

    2

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    3/10

    Jordi Planas

    In the biogeochemical cycle of nitrogen, nitrogen fixation is paramount, but only some bacteria

    and archaea are able to fix atmospheric N2.

    Wood is an abundant source of organic carbon which can be used to feed animals.

    Wood-eating organisms rely on a food source which contains a nitrogen-to-carbon ratio which is

    about one hundred times lower that the ratio found in their tissues.

    Nitrogen fixing organisms are bacteria and archea. They might live free in the environment or in

    symbiosis with other organisms.

    Shipworms are mollusk bivalves that rely on wood as their primary food source. Shipworms do

    not have conspicuous communities of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in their guts as thermites do.

    Shipworms have a region on their gills called Deshayes gland where they have special cells called

    bacteriocytes which are full of intracellular symbiont bacteria.

    FISH and qPCRave been used to determine the bacterial nature of the symbionts

    Main questionCan we couple the identity of microbes with their activity in the environment?

    Can we determine whether symbionts in bacteriocytes are responsible for nitrogen fixation and supplyof organic nitrogen to the worm?

    Background insights

    Here the student must gather information of the key points in order to build a clearer picture

    of the topic under investigation. One possible way is to get insight of the main background

    ideas.

    The biogeochemical cycle of

    nitrogenA classical view of the cycle considers

    five main forms of nitrogen compounds

    and links them in a symmetric manner

    (Fig. 1). However, if we take into

    consideration the diversity of organisms

    that are able to participate in the

    different transformations, we soon

    realize that while animals and a great

    deal of saprophytic microorganisms are

    able to convert organic nitrogen intoinorganic NH4+, and many genera are

    able to convert nitrate to organic

    nitrogen, as for example plants (Fig.2),

    few genera are responsible for

    nitrification and other few genera are

    responsible for denitrification or

    nitrogen gas production via

    anammoxreation. Taking into account

    only these reactions we would assist to a

    3

    Fig. 1

    Fig. 2

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    4/10

    Jordi Planas

    gradual decrease of assimilable and organic nitrogen pools. Thus, atmospheric nitrogen

    fixation is a key process to:

    Avoid assimilable nitrogen depletion

    Ensure access to atmospheric nitrogen pools.

    Signing agreements with bacteria for a mutualistic relationship might be a good deal for many

    species to ensure a proper organic nitrogen supply.

    ShipwormShipworms are not worms at all, but rather a group of unusual

    saltwater clams with very small shells, notorious for boring into

    (and eventually destroying) wooden structures that are immersed in

    sea water, such as piers, docks and wooden ships. Sometimes called

    "termites of the sea", they are marine bivalve mollusks

    (Eulamellibranchiata) in the family Teredinidae, also often known

    as Teredo Worms.

    When shipworms bore into submerged wood, bacteria

    (Teredinibacterturnerae strain ATCC 39867 / T7901) in a special

    organ called the gland of Deshayes allow them to digest cellulose.

    The excavated burrow is usually lined with a calcareous tube.

    Shipworms have slender worm-like forms, but nonetheless possess

    the characteristic structures of bivalves. The valves of the shell of

    shipworms are small separate parts located at the anterior end of

    the worm, used for excavating the burrow.

    Fig. 4.(1) Shell; (2) Foot; (3) Cephalic hood; (4) Mantle collar; (5) Excurrent siphon;(6) Incurrent siphon; (7) Pallet.

    FISH

    The ribosomal-RNA (rRNA) approach to microbial evolution and ecology has become an integral partof environmental microbiology. Based on the patchy conservation of rRNA, oligonucleotide probes can

    be designed with specificities that range from the species level to the level of phyla or even domains.

    When these probes are labelled with fluorescent dyes or the enzyme horseradish peroxidase, they can

    be used to identify single microbial cells directly by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

    rRNA molecules are well suited for the identification of Bacteria and Archaea for several reasons. First,

    all cells require ribosomes for translation. Each prokaryotic ribosome contains one 16S rRNA of

    approx1,600 nucleotides in the SSU, and one 23S rRNA of approx3,000 nucleotides and one 5S rRNA

    of approx120 nucleotides in the large subunit (LSU). As each cell contains many ribosomes, these

    4

    Fig. 3

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    5/10

    Jordi Planas

    target molecules are naturally amplified to numbers that can range from a few hundred to 100,000 per

    cell.

    Second, the evolutionary conservation of rRNA sequences is patchy, but is generally much higher than

    that of most protein-encoding genes. As the evolutionary pressure is on the RNA product, there is no

    rapidly evolving third-codon position. This enables the design of oligonucleotide probes for large

    taxonomic entities, such as domains, phyla, classes or orders.

    Third, targeting rRNA for

    identification links microbial ecology

    and microbial evolution, a concept

    that was first promoted by Norman

    Pace and colleagues14 in 1986. In

    this system, categorization is no

    longer based on morphology (for

    example, rods versus cocci) or

    physiology (for example, aerobes

    versus facultative anaerobes versusstrict anaerobes), but rather is based

    on the three domains, Archaea,

    Bacteria and Eukarya, and phyla and

    classes, such as the Alpha-, Beta- and

    Gammaproteobacteria.

    The treatment that takes place before hybridization is crucial for a quantitative FISH assay. The task is,

    on the one hand, to preserve the integrity and shape of all cells and prevent cell loss through lysis,

    while on the other hand, permeabilizing as many cells as possible to allow the labelled oligonucleotides

    to diffuse to their intracellular rRNA target molecules. The challenge is that the cell-wall composition

    of bacteria and archaea is diverse. Formaldehyde and ethanol continue to be the main fixatives used,

    but there is still no standard permeabilization protocol for all microbial cells. Empirical optimizationsoften consider the specific composition of the cell wall and can include modifications such as

    enzymatic digestion of thick peptidoglycan

    layers by lysozyme, digestion of

    proteinaceous cell walls by proteases, the

    removal of wax by solvents, the use of

    detergents and even short-term

    incubations in hydrochloric acid.

    In figure 5 there is an example of

    fluorescence microscopy, using FISH

    technology of the interaction between

    Microalgae growth-promoting bacteria

    (Azospirillum) immobilized in alginate

    bead with native bacteria of the

    wastewater. (Green = genusAzospirillum;

    Red = Domain bacteria; Yellow = Super-

    imposition of the two images [producing

    yellow cells] specifically identifying

    Azospirillum)

    5

    4

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    6/10

    Jordi Planas

    Analysis of the main question

    This section is devoted to the analysis of the main question. Here we will try to propose and discuss the

    methods that can be used to shed light into the question of whether the bacteria

    Teredinibacterturnerae located in the gland of Deshayes of the shipworm Lyroduspedicellatusis

    responsible for the fixation of N2 and the transfer of nitrogen to the mollusk.

    Then, we will evaluate the statistical implications of the data sampled from the experiments.

    Experimental proceduresIn the classroom we have proposed the following experimental procedures.

    First proposalOne way to see if bacteria within the consortium are fixing N2 is to grow the shipworm in a medium

    which does not contain any source of nitrogen except N2. Thus no organic nitrogen, no nitrates or

    nitrites, no ammonia should be present.

    First we should analyze, what kind of questions can we really answer with this experimental design?

    Logical analysis of the proposalAs nitrogen is vital for the growth and maintenance of Lyrodus:

    1. if, after several weeks of experiment, the mollusk is dead or decaying we can conclude that:

    Lyrodus is not able to fix atmospheric nitrogen. This is in agreement with the observation thatno animal has been found to fix N2.

    Whether Teredinibacteris able of fixing nitrogen or not, it does not provide any usable form of

    nitrogen toLyrodus.

    1. if, after several weeks of experiment, the mollusk is alive or even has been growing, we can

    conclude that:

    The symbiosis between the mollusk and bacteria is able of fixing nitrogen.

    Thus, this experiment is only able to answer one question:

    Is the symbiosis betweenLyrodus and Teredinibacterable to fix nitrogen?

    Conclusions

    At the beginning we hypothesized that this symbiosis should fix nitrogen because the food source of

    the shipworm has an average nitrogen concentration much lower than nitrogen concentration in the

    mollusk tissues. However we did not have direct experimental evidence. This experiment would, thus,

    provide the experimental evidence for this hypothesis, but nothing else and obviously nothing relevant

    for our main question.

    Second proposal

    6

    Fig. 5

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    7/10

    Jordi Planas

    Isolating and maintaining in a culture media the gill tissue containing both animal cells and bacterial

    cells. Then, cultivating them in a medium free of any form of assimilable nitrogen other than N2.

    Logical analysis of the proposalThis experiment is rather similar to the one first proposed but it restricts the analysis to the physiology

    of gills. As nitrogen is vital for the growth and maintenance of Lyrodus,

    1. if, after several weeks of experiment, the tissue is dead or decaying we can conclude that:

    The tissue is not able to fix atmospheric nitrogen. This is in agreement with the observation

    that no animal has been found to fix N2.

    Whether Teredinibacteris able of fixing nitrogen or not, it does not provide any usable form of

    nitrogen to the tissue.

    2. if, after several weeks of experiment, the mollusk is alive or even has been growing, we can

    conclude that:

    The symbiosis between the mollusk and bacteria is able of fixing nitrogen.

    Thus, this experiment is only able to answer two questions:

    Is the symbiosis betweenLyrodus and Teredinibacterable to fix nitrogen? And, is the nitrogen

    fixation process performed at least in the gills?

    However, care must be taken if the results are negative because growing a tissue outside the host is not

    straightforward. Thus, the appropriate controls should be put in place.

    Conclusions

    At the beginning we hypothesized that this symbiosis should fix nitrogen because the food source of

    the shipworm has an average nitrogen concentration much lower than nitrogen concentration in the

    mollusk tissues. However we did not have direct experimental evidence. This experiment would, thus,

    provide the experimental evidence for this hypothesis, but nothing else and obviously nothing relevantfor our main question.

    Third proposalTreating the shipworm with antibiotics to bleach it. A bleached shipworm would be cultivated in a

    medium with N2 as the sole source of nitrogen.

    Logical analysis of the proposalAs nitrogen is vital for the growth and maintenance of Lyrodus,

    1. if, after several weeks of experiment, the animal is dead or decaying we can conclude that:

    The symbiosys is mutualistic and the mollusk depends on the bacteria for its survial.

    No conclusion can be achieved on whether the key point is nitrogen fixation. It could well be

    cellulose processing, or the synthesis of a key component.

    2. if, after several weeks of experiment, the mollusk is alive or even has been growing, we can

    conclude that:

    The wormship itself is able to fix nitrogen which does not exclude the possibility that part of

    the nitrogen in the mollusk tissues comes from the bacteria. However, this colud be a very nice

    way of demonstrating the ability of the mollusk to fix nitrogen..

    Thus, this experiment is only able to answer two questions:

    Is the symbiosis betweenLyrodus and Teredinibactera form of mutualism?

    7

  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    8/10

    Jordi Planas

    Is the mollusk, by itself, able to fix N2?

    Conclusions

    This experiment is relatively poor in terms of providing evidence on the physiology of the symbiotic

    association. However, if the bleached mollusk is able to grow on N2, then we could demonstrate for the

    first time in the history that an animal is able to fix atmospheric nitrogen.

    Fourth proposalGrowing the shipworm toghether with its symbiotic partner in a medium containing only N2 as a

    source of nitrogen. If we use a isotope of nitrogen we can later follow the incorporation of nitrogen in

    the different tissues of the shipworm.

    Logical analysis of the proposal

    In order to explore this hypothesis we have to find the right tools. The two critical points are:

    The type of isotope to be used.

    The technique to measure the incorporation of isotopes in the tissues.

    Isotopes

    Nitrogen has got 17 isotopes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_nitrogen) 15 of them are

    radiactive and two of them are stable. Using radiactive isotopes have proved to be very useful for

    matabolic studies. However the half-life of the isotopes is very important. 13N is the one having the

    longest half-life and it is only of 10 minutes. Thus we can only work with this isotope if:

    We have a cyclotron in the lab for producing the isotope just on time.

    The process that we study last less than ten minutes.

    As the fixation and further transfer of organic nitrogen to the host tissue might last longer than ten

    minutes, 13N is probably not the isotope of choice.

    15N is a stable isotope which is very scarce in nature. The natural ratio 15N/14N is in the order of

    0.00367.

    Detection methods

    In order to detect stable isotopes we can use two approximations:

    Differential centrifugation. The tissues that have incorporated 15N will be denser than those

    that have natural proportions of this isotope. Thus, centrifugation could be a technique of

    choice. The only problem is sensibility. Would differential centrifugation be sensible enough

    to discriminate between 15N rich and 15N poor tissues? We could perform some preliminary

    assays, but taking into account that nitrogen is only a minor component of proteins and that

    proteins are a minor component of the wheight of a tissue, which is overhemingly dominated

    by water, the influence of the incorporation of15N into the experimental tissues on the total

    density of the sample could be too weak to be detected.

    Mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry is the technique of choice when we want todiscriminate between two isotopes that share common chemical properties, but the problem ishow to make direct mesures on an intact tissue. Multi-isotope imaging massspectrometry(MIMS) is a technique developed

    8

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_nitrogenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_nitrogen
  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    9/10

    Jordi Planas

    Conclusions

    This experiment is relatively poor in terms of providing evidence on the physiology of the symbiotic

    association. However, if the bleached mollusk is able to grow on N2, then we could demonstrate for the

    first time in the history that an animal is able to fix atmospheric nitrogen.

    9

    http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/85/i38/8538notw8.html
  • 8/3/2019 sizing_up

    10/10

    Jordi Planas

    10