Six Year Plan Second Quarter 2012-13. Second Quarter Report 2012 In the fall of 2009, the Mount Olive Township Public Schools adopted a six year plan

Six Year PlanSecond Quarter 2012-13

Second Quarter Report 2012In the fall of 2009, the Mount Olive Township Public Schools adopted a six year plan that was

intended to drive student academic achievement, organize schools for success, re-equip faculty, staff, and students with sophisticated learning tools, promote an expanded partnership with parents, and implement enriching teaching methodologies that motivate.

During the second quarter of the fourth year of this plan, the district continued improving its academic programs by extending learning time through the district’s new IMAGINE after school program and expanding the use of the innovative Compass Learning software system. The second quarter activities also included the idea of “personalizing” instruction through ever-increasingly sophisticated technological tools . Personalization efforts included the implementation of a BYOT (Bring Your Own Technology) program for 8th and 9th grade students (where students bring their own computing devices to school for use in their classes. In addition, the MindPlay software system was initiated in all elementary schools. Mindplay promotes strong reading and language development among early readers.

As a result of such efforts, we have noted progress toward our broad improvement goals. Much of the progress is reported through each school’s individual second quarter report (posted on each school’s website) and through individual teacher SMART goals. An overview summary of some of this progress follows:

3

Mount Olive High SchoolSecond Quarter Improvement Actions:

1. Implemented a schedule that provides for the establishment of Professional Learning Communities within the constraints of the normal contract day. During the second quarter 90 + PLC meetings were conducted to develop quarterly exams and analyze student performance. Monday afternoons have also been dedicated to PLC time.

2. Students requiring remediation in Language Arts and Math have been scheduled for Math Workshop and Language Arts Workshop.

3. HSPA Press Extended Year Program involves nearly 80 students who are at risk of failing the HSPA for Math intensive review and preparation.

4. Implemented the use of the Scholastic Reading Inventory to establish a set of baseline data that all future observations may be measured against for identified students

5. Staff trained in the use of a multitude of technologies – BYOT, SMARTboards, STAM, Sharp, Class Link, Compass Learning, and encouraged to use at least once per week – Tech Days

4

Mount Olive High SchoolSecond Quarter Improvement Actions :

1. Utilized Compass Learning for remedial use and reinforcement for at-risk students and regular education students in Math and Language Arts.

2. Implemented the use of the Scholastic Reading Inventory to establish a set of baseline data that all future observations may be measured against for identified students

3. Continued use of PowerGrade e-alerts to inform parents of grades recorded lower than a 70%

4. Installed cable access for broadcast of school/district information – MOTV morning announcements and programming are broadcast live to our community via Cablevision and FIOS. Bulletins are posted around the clock.

5. Started a Principal’s Twitter account to broadcast good news items and updates.

Mount Olive Middle SchoolSecond Quarter Improvement Actions1. In March 2013, Susan Miranda and Kevin Stansberry met with 25-30 eighth grade students

and their parents in order to discuss the possibility of retention in 8th grade due to poor grades.

2. The principals informed students and parents of their expectations for achievement and what it would take to pass 8th grade. All students will be seen again in three weeks with Mr. Einreinhofer and Susan Miranda in order to review progress and discuss any concerns about their student achievement.

3. Learning lab for students who are partially proficient receive individualized instruction during 3R’s to work on their Compass learning path. At this time, 271 students are being serviced through 3Rs in order to bring their skill level up in ELA and Math.

4. In addition students are working through on their learning paths. Students work with their regular education teacher to graph their progress.

5. ELA, Special Ed and Math teachers, Chris Reagan and Susan Miranda meet on a monthly basis to review student progress, specifically students who are in our at-risk groups in order to consider additional opportunities for students who are not working to their potential

Mount Olive Middle SchoolSecond Quarter Improvement Actions1. Data for Compass in ELA shows that Grade 6 led the school in overall average

achievement score of 85, completing over 5700 learning/assessment activities. Grade 7 performed well with an average achievement score of 80, completing 3500 learning/assessment activities in the reporting period.

2. Grade 8 logged the most minutes on task at just over 56,000 minutes and 5500 learning/assess

3. Powerschool quarterly reports are run to determine students who are not passing. Counselors and CST personnel work with the students who are failing in order to assist them with strategies to improve grades

4. SMART GOALS were developed for 2012-2013 all grade levels/departmental areas.– Data was used to identify areas of weakness. Elective areas used reading/writing initiatives to

develop SMART goals.– PLC’s actively work on implementing SMART goals and track student progress in targeted areas.– PLC’s actively are working on developing quarterly assessments and common planning in order to

ensure consistency among core academic teachers.

CMSSecond Quarter Improvement Actions 1. Before school SWAT team has continued to work with 3, 4, & 5th grade students for

the arrival 10 minutes on multiplication facts2. Started a before school program three days a week for 4th graders that are weak in

reading using Mind Play3. After school, Imagine program had an increase of students adding the 3rd graders

to have a total of 80 students4. Developed school wide vocabulary focus5. Instituted our school wide reading home program to read 1,100 minutes in 8

weeks6. Administered third SRI assessment to grades 2-57. Teachers worked closely with Writer’s Workshop leaders on writing components

for the ASK testing8. 5th Grade started Battle of the Books 9. Infusion of tablets into the second and third grade classes

7

CMSSecond Quarter Improvement Actions1. Instituted a Tech Day in every grade level2. Compass program to be used in every classroom3. Mind Play being used with students with weak reading skills4. In-serviced staff on Compass and Mind Play5. Second Grade staff individually in serviced with their class on Mind Play6. All teachers working on their individual class smart goals

8

SandshoreSecond Quarter Improvement Actions1. Moved Reading Practice back to first period for grades 3-52. Implemented math facts in grades 3-53. Implemented Daily 5 in second grade during reading practice4. Daily 5 protocol turned-keyed to staff members by second grade team5. Allowed choice of books during reading practice in 2nd grade and grades 3-5

commencing second rotation, 1st grade commenced third rotation6. Implemented Daily 5 in grades 3-5 during reading practice for second rotation, 1st

grade during third rotation7. Designed new Running Records report identifying strengths/weaknesses 8. Administered Second Expository Essay – scored using state rubric – compared

results 9. Designed Expository Essay report identifying strengths/weaknesses 10. Administered third SRI assessment grades 2-511. Administered first SRI assessment to 1st grade

SandshoreSecond Quarter Improvement Actions1. Developed more of a school wide vocabulary focus2. Staff analyzed Link-it data and SRI data during PLCs3. Staff developed SMART Goals based on Link-it data4. Utilized CQ’s during reading comprehension and independent guided reading time grades

3-55. Moved 4th Grade CQ’s into third grade6. Special Ed teachers utilized Compass Learning to address individual weaknesses.

Compass Learning integrated into regular ed. classes7. Implemented Imagine program after school8. Implemented Study Island across grades 2-59. Infused tablets into grades 1-310. Implemented AM tutoring utilizing Mindplay11. Eliminated SCR during reading practice12. Staff following new Writer’s Workshop outline13. Thematic novels no longer read as a class – segmented for more direct instruction14. Program designed to address the reading of twenty-five additional books

– “Readcycle” “Snowcabulary” “Battle of the Books” “Great Adventure Program”

Mountain ViewSecond Quarter Improvement Actions1. First Graders learned to read the Primer List of Dolch Words. In addition to reading the 52

Primer Dolch Word List, the students were asked to spell the 52 Primer words.2. Students use Dolch words in sentence writing homework; in a Dice/Roll center were words are

copied and put into sentences; through “rainbow” writing words; through activities such as a Dolch ball toss- copy word you catch and put into sentences, etc.

3. Students were assessed at the beginning of the year on their ability to identify uppercase letters. Students were assessed again in January, 2013 using the same procedures. By January, almost all students knew their letters.

4. Students will work with the PAWS for reading program.5. New reading initiative with students- 25 books on Lexile level for the year per student.6. Students practice A to Z fluency activities in the classroom.7. Students complete Anchor Activities in the classroom.8. New Vocabulary program within the classroom.

New Jersey Report CardsThe New Jersey Department of Education compares each Mount Olive school with

other New Jersey schools with similar demographic characteristics. The comparisons are designed to assist parents, students, faculty, and staff evaluate the school’s relative progress against other similar schools. The primary points of comparison are related to family income (the percentage of students receiving free or reduced lunch meals), limited language capabilities (LEP percentages in each school), and the percentage of students within a school with handicapping conditions that require special education.

Within a certain demographic range, each Mount Olive school is assigned a “peer” comparison group. Each peer school’s results are compared to determine whether the school is progressing better or worse than the average school among the peers. High poverty, LEP, and special education schools are compared to other similar schools with respect to student performance on the state NJASK and HSPA exams. The same is true with every demographic band among all schools in New Jersey. The set of peer schools for the 2012 NJASK results follows.

Mountain View Elementary Peer Schools

Listed by County, District, then school name

BERGEN BERGENFIELD BORO FRANKLIN ; BERGEN MAHWAH TWP JOYCE KILMER ; BERGEN NEW MILFORD BORO BERKLEY ST; BERGEN NEW MILFORD BORO BERTRAM F GIBBS; BERGEN SADDLE BROOK TWP LONG MEMORIAL; BERGEN WESTWOOD REGIONAL BERKELEY AVE; BURLINGTON BORDENTOWN REGIONAL MAC FARLAND INTERMEDIATE; BURLINGTON MOUNT LAUREL TWP PARKWAY; GLOUCESTER EAST GREENWICH TWP SAMUEL MICKLE SCHOOL; GLOUCESTER WASHINGTON TWP BIRCHES; GLOUCESTER WASHINGTON TWP WHITMAN; HUNTERDON HIGH BRIDGE BORO HIGH BRIDGE ELEM; MERCER HAMILTON TWP UNI HTS HOWARD D MORRISON; MERCER LAWRENCE TWP ELDRIDGE PARK SCHOOL; MERCER PRINCETON REGIONAL JOHNSON PARK SCHOOL; MIDDLESEX EDISON TWP WASHINGTON; MIDDLESEX SOUTH BRUNSWICK TWP BROOKS CROSSING ELEM SCH; MONMOUTH HOWELL TWP ALDRICH; MONMOUTH MIDDLETOWN TWP BAYVIEW; MORRIS JEFFERSON TWP ARTHUR STANLICK; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP CHESTER M STEPHENS SCHOOL; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP MOUNTAIN VIEW; PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLSTWP MORRIS; OCEAN POINT PLEASANT BORO NELLIE F BENNETT ELEM SCH; PASSAIC POMPTON LAKES BORO LINCOLN; PASSAIC WEST MILFORD TWP UPPER GREENWOOD LAKE; SOMERSET HILLSBOROUGH TWP SUNNYMEAD; SUSSEX VERNON TWP CEDAR MOUNTAIN SCHOOL; UNION ROSELLE PARK BORO SHERMAN; WARREN BELVIDERE TOWN THIRD STREET; WARREN WASHINGTON TWP PORT COLDEN

Tinc Road Elementary Peer Schools


BERGEN HASBROUCK HEIGHTS BORO LINCOLN; BURLINGTON DELRAN TWP DELRAN INTERMEDIATE SCH; BURLINGTON MOUNT LAUREL TWP HILLSIDE; CAMDEN HADDON TWP STOY; CAMDEN VOORHEES TWP OSAGE; ESSEX BLOOMFIELD TWP DEMAREST; ESSEX MONTCLAIR TOWN NORTHEAST; GLOUCESTER SWEDESBORO-WOOLWICH GEN CHARLES G HARKER SCH; MERCER HAMILTON TWP MORGAN; MIDDLESEX EAST BRUNSWICK TWP LAWRENCE BROOK; MIDDLESEX EDISON TWP LINCOLN; MIDDLESEX EDISON TWP MENLO PARK; MIDDLESEX OLD BRIDGE TWP JAMES MC DIVITT ELEM ; WP CONSTABLE; MIDDLESEX SOUTH PLAINFIELD BORO JOHN F KENNEDY; MIDDLESEX WOODBRIDGE TWP KENNEDY PARK; MONMOUTH HOWELL TWP EDITH M GRIEBLING; MANALAPAN-ENGLISHTOW; N REG MONMOUTH; MATAWAN-ABERDEEN STRATHMORE KG-03; ; MONMOUTH; MONMOUTH MIDDLETOWN TWP HARMONY; MONMOUTH TINTON FALLS SWIMMING RIVER; ; MORRIS BOONTON TOWN SCHOOL ST; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP TINC ROAD ; MORRIS ROCKAWAY TWP DENNIS B O BRIEN SCH; MORRIS ROXBURY TWP NIXON; OCEAN BARNEGAT TWP JOSEPH T DONAHUE ELEM; OCEAN PLUMSTED TWP NEW EGYPT ELEM SCH; OCEAN POINT PLEASANT BORO OCEAN ROAD ELEM ; RIDGEWATER-RARITAN JOHN F KENNEDY KG-04; SOMERSET SUSSEX STILLWATER TWP STILLWATER TWP; UNION UNION TWP WASHINGTON

SandshoreElementary Peer Schools


BURLINGTON EVESHAM TWP J HAROLD VAN ZANT; BURLINGTON EVESHAM TWP RICHARD L RICE SCHOOL; BURLINGTON MANSFIELD TWP MANSFIELD TWP ELEM SCH; BURLINGTON MEDFORD TWP MILTON H ALLEN; BURLINGTON MOORESTOWN TWP GEORGE C BAKER; BURLINGTON SPRINGFIELD TWP SPRINGFIELD TWP; CAMDEN CHERRY HILL TWP A RUSSELL KNIGHT; ESSEX BLOOMFIELD TWP OAK VIEW; CALDWELL-WEST LINCOLN KG-05; CALDWELL ESSEX SOUTH MOUNTAIN ANNEX; ORANGE-MAPLEWOOD ESSEX; GLOUCESTER HARRISON TWP HARRISON TOWNSHIP; MERCER HAMILTON TWP YARDVILLE; MIDDLESEX EDISON TWP JAMES MADISON INTER; MIDDLESEX OLD BRIDGE TWP M SCOTT CARPENTER MIDDLESEX WOODBRIDGE TWP OAK RIDGE HEIGHTS; MONMOUTH FREEHOLD TWP C RICHARD APPLEGATE; MONMOUTH FREEHOLD TWP MARSHALL W ERRICKSON; MONMOUTH FREEHOLD TWP WEST FREEHOLD; MONMOUTH HAZLET TWP RARITAN VALLEY SCHOOL; MONMOUTH MIDDLETOWN TWP FAIRVIEW ; MONMOUTH MIDDLETOWN TWP NEW MONMOUTH; MORRIS JEFFERSON TWP WHITE ROCK ; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP SANDSHORE ROAD; MORRIS ROCKAWAY TWP KATHERINE D MALONE; OCEAN JACKSON TWP ELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; PASSAIC WAYNE TWP RANDALL CARTER 31-5570-135; PASSAIC WEST MILFORD TWP MAPLE ROAD; SUSSEX FREDON TWP FREDON TWP; SCOTCH PLAINS-FANWOOD HOWARD B BRUNNER PK-04; UNION SPRINGFIELD TWP THELMA L SANDMEIER; WARREN FRANKLIN TWP FRANKLIN TWP

CMS Elementary Peer Schools


BERGEN MAHWAH TWP JOYCE KILMER; BERGEN NEW MILFORD BORO BERKLEY ST; BERGEN NEW MILFORD BORO BERTRAM F GIBBS; BERGEN SADDLE BROOK TWP LONG MEMORIAL; BERGEN WESTWOOD REGIONAL BERKELEY AVE ; BURLINGTON BORDENTOWN REGIONAL MAC FARLAND INTERMEDIATE; BURLINGTON LUMBERTON TWP ASHBROOK ELEM SCH; CAPE MAY UPPER TWP UPPER TOWNSHIP ELEM; GLOUCESTER EAST GREENWICH TWP SAMUEL MICKLE SCHOOL; GLOUCESTER WASHINGTON TWP BIRCHES 1; GLOUCESTER WASHINGTON TWP WHITMAN; HUNTERDON HIGH BRIDGE BORO HIGH BRIDGE ELEM ; MERCER HAMILTON TWP UNI HTS HOWARD D MORRISON; MERCER LAWRENCE TWP ELDRIDGE PARK SCHOOL ; MERCER PRINCETON REGIONAL JOHNSON PARK SCHOOL ; MIDDLESEX EDISON TWP WASHINGTON ; MIDDLESEX SOUTH BRUNSWICK TWP BROOKS CROSSING ELEM SCH ; MONMOUTH HOWELL TWP ALDRICH ; MONMOUTH MIDDLETOWN TWP BAYVIEW ; MORRIS JEFFERSON TWP ARTHUR STANLICK ; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP CHESTER M STEPHENS SCHOOL ; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP MOUNTAIN VIEW ; PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS LAKE HIAWATHA SCHOOL PK-05; OCEAN POINT PLEASANT BORO NELLIE F BENNETT ELEM SCH; PASSAIC BLOOMINGDALE BORO SAMUEL R DONALD ; PASSAIC POMPTON LAKES BORO LINCOLN 31-4230-070 ; SOMERSET HILLSBOROUGH TWP SUNNYMEAD ; SUSSEX VERNON TWP CEDAR MOUNTAIN SCHOOL ; UNION ROSELLE PARK BORO SHERMAN ; WARREN BELVIDERE TOWN THIRD STREET ; WARREN WASHINGTON TWP PORT COLDEN

MOMSPeer Schools


BURLINGTON EASTAMPTON TWP EASTAMPTON COMMUNITY SCH; BURLINGTON MOUNT LAUREL TWP T E HARRINGTON MIDDLE; CAMDEN STRATFORD BORO SAMUEL S YELLIN; RENAISSANCE REGIONALLEADERSHIP CS; RENAISSANCE REGIONAL KG-08; LEADERSHIP CS CHARTERS; ESSEX MONTCLAIR TOWN GLENFIELD MIDDLE; GLOUCESTER WASHINGTON TWP ORCHARD VALLEY MIDDLE; GLOUCESTER WEST DEPTFORD TWP WEST DEPTFORD MIDDLE ; HUNTERDON BLOOMSBURY BORO BLOOMSBURY BOROUGH; HUNTERDON FLEMINGTON-RARITAN REG J P CASE MIDDLE SCHOOL; MIDDLESEX METUCHEN BORO EDGAR; MIDDLESEX SPOTSWOOD BORO SPOTSWOOD MEMORIAL SCHOOL; MIDDLESEX WOODBRIDGE TWP COLONIA MIDDLE ; MONMOUTH FARMINGDALE BORO FARMINGDALE ELEMENTARY; MONMOUTH TINTON FALLS TINTON FALLS; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP MT OLIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL; MORRIS ROXBURY TWP EISENHOWER MIDDLE; OCEAN PLUMSTED TWP NEW EGYPT MIDDLE SCH; OCEAN SOUTHERN REGIONAL SOUTHERN REG MIDDLE 2; OCEAN TOMS RIVER REGIONAL TOMS RIVER INTERMEDIATE E; OCEAN TOMS RIVER REGIONAL TOMS RIVER INTERMEDIATE S; SALEM PENNSVILLE PENNSVILLE MIDDLE; SUSSEX HAMBURG BORO HAMBURG; SUSSEX STANHOPE BORO VALLEY ROAD SCHOOL; SUSSEX VERNON TWP GLEN MEADOW; UNION SPRINGFIELD TWP FLORENCE M GAUDINEER; WARREN HACKETTSTOWN HACKETTSTOWN MIDDLE; WARREN HOPE TWP HOPE TWP; WARREN OXFORD TWP OXFORD CENTRAL; WARREN WARREN HILLS REGIONAL WARREN HILLS REG MIDD SCH;

MOHSPeer Schools


BERGEN HASBROUCK HEIGHTS BORO HASBROUCK HEIGHTS HIGH; BERGEN LYNDHURST TWP LYNDHURST HIGH; BERGEN NORTH ARLINGTON BORO NORTH ARLINGTON HIGH; BERGEN WOOD-RIDGE BORO WOOD RIDGE HIGH; BURLINGTON BURLINGTON TWP BURLINGTON TWP HIGH; RANCOCAS VALLEY RANCOCAS VALLEY REG H 09-12; REGIONAL BURLINGTON BLACK HORSE PIKE HIGHLAND HIGH 09-12; REGIONAL CAMDEN; BLACK HORSE PIKE TIMBER CREEK HIGH 09-12; REGIONALCAMDEN; CAMDEN CHERRY HILL TWP CHERRY HILL HIGH WEST; CAMDEN HADDON HEIGHTS BORO HADDON HEIGHTS JR SR HS; CAMDEN HADDON TWP HADDON TWP HIGH; GLOUCESTER DELSEA REGIONAL H.S DIST. DELSEA REGIONAL HIGH SCH; GLOUCESTER WEST DEPTFORD TWP WEST DEPTFORD HIGH; MIDDLESEX SPOTSWOOD BORO SPOTSWOOD HIGH; MONMOUTH MANASQUAN BORO MANASQUAN HIGH; MONMOUTH MONMOUTH REGIONAL MONMOUTH REG HIGH; MORRIS BUTLER BORO BUTLER HIGH; MORRIS MOUNT OLIVE TWP MT OLIVE HIGH; OCEAN BARNEGAT TWP BARNEGAT HIGH SCHOOL; OCEAN JACKSON TWP JACKSON LIBERTY HIGH; OCEAN LACEY TWP LACEY TWP HIGH; OCEAN TOMS RIVER REGIONAL TOMS RIVER HIGH EAST; OCEAN TOMS RIVER REGIONAL TOMS RIVER HIGH NORTH ; OCEAN TOMS RIVER REGIONAL TOMS RIVER HIGH SOUTH; PASSAIC POMPTON LAKES BORO POMPTON LAKES HIGH; WOODSTOWN-PILESGROVE WOODSTOWN HIGH 09-12; REG SALEM; SOMERSET SOMERVILLE BORO SOMERVILLE HIGH; SUSSEX NEWTON TOWN NEWTON HIGH; UNION SUMMIT CITY SUMMIT SR HIGH; WARREN HACKETTSTOWN HACKETTSTOWN HIGH; WARREN WARREN HILLS REGIONAL WARREN HILLS REG HIGH SCH
















Peer Rankings

MOHS

MOMS

CMS

MV

SS

TR

5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95MOHS MOMS CMS MV SS TR

Peer Rank 73 76 87 66 63 91

Peer Rank Mean score of our peer schools

Student Growth By Grade

LAL DISTRICT % 4 5 6 7 8

High Growth 621 35 124 36% 155 43% 91 26% 135 39% 116 32%

Expected Growth 552 31.2 106 30% 110 30% 122 35% 112 32% 102 28%

Low Growth 599 33.8 119 34% 99 27% 139 40% 101 29% 141 39%

MATH DISTRICT % 4 5 6 7 8

High Growth 734 41.4 134 38.4 133 37% 158 45% 150 43% 159 44%

Expected Growth 547 30.9 115 33 124 34% 111 32% 93 27% 104 29%

Low Growth 491 27.7 100 28.7 107 29% 83 24% 105 30% 96 27%

Students At-Risk

All CMS MV SS TR MOMS

LAL PP 165 46 53 33 33 239

Math PP 77 19 24 18 16 173

LAL Low Growth 120 38 46 20 16 385

Math Low Growth 99 36 31 19 13 290

Overage for Grade 291 91 98 48 54 23

Chronic Absenteeism 85 16 30 13 26 66

1 Area 623 194 196 114 119 657

3 or more areas 43 11 18 8 6 142

Reading Comprehension in the Mount Olive schools

Compared to the beginning of the year, students in Mount Olive are reading with much more comprehension. Second grade students made the greatest gains in comprehension. At the beginning of the 2012 school year almost 35% of Mount Olive students scored in the “Below Basic” range on the SRI (Scholastic Reading Inventory) . Fewer than 9% scored “Advanced Proficient”. By the end of the second quarter, almost 25% of second graders had scored in the “Advanced Proficient” range on the SRI (up 177%)and fewer than 13% of students were considered “Below Basic” (down 62%).

Third and fourth grade students produced around 30% more “advanced proficient” scores for reading comprehension on the SRI by the end of the second quarter than they did at the beginning of the year. The percentage of students scoring “Below Basic” declined over the last quarter for both grades from around 7% to around 4% (down 42%).

Fifth graders produced the fewest gains in “Advanced Proficient” ratings (up 17%) on the SRI. Fewer than 2% of fifth graders scored in the “Below Basic” range on the SRI however.

As to individual school results, Sandshore second graders out produced and out gained second graders from other schools (36% scored “Advanced Proficient”). CMS produced the best group of third grade readers (37% were considered “Advanced Proficient)”.

District SRI Grade 2 2012 – 2013

September 2012 November 2012 January 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

34.3%

23.2%

12.7%

22.0%

15.2%

16.0%

34.9%

46.0%

46.6%

8.9%15.5%

24.7%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

7.5% 7.5% 4.5%

27.3%20.3%

17.2%

44.8%

47.7%

48.4%

20.5%24.5%

29.9%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

8.3% 6.3% 4.4%

19.1%15.7%

15.3%

51.7%

51.4%49.3%

21.0%26.6%

31.1%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2.7% 2.1% 2.1%

10.7%7.7% 5.8%

51.5%53.2%

51.3%

35.1% 37.0%40.7%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

School-Based Reading Comprehension results

Sandshore second graders out produced and out gained second graders from other schools (36% scored “Advanced Proficient”) on the last administration of the Scholastic reading Inventory (SRI).

CMS produced the best group of third grade scores on the SRI (37% were considered “Advanced Proficient”.

Sandshore school produced the best 4th grade results. Around 33% of 4th graders scored in the “advanced” range on the SRI.

The fifth graders of Tinc Road scored the highest percentage of “advanced” performances on the SRI (45%)

Overall, all schools produced more “advanced proficient” performances on the SRI and many fewer “below basic” performances on the second quarter SRI assessments compared to the beginning of the year (although Sandshore second graders produced a slight increase in “below basic” scores).

Chester M. Stephens SRI Grade 2 2012 – 2013


10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

39.3%

24.6%

11.6%

20.5%

15.8%

17.9%

33.0%

49.1%

51.8%

7.1% 10.5%18.8%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

IMPRESSIVE GAIN



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2.9% 3.0% 1.0%

29.8%

20.2%17.2%

39.4%

45.5%

44.4%

27.9% 31.3%37.4%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

6.0% 5.9% 4.9%

24.0% 20.8% 21.4%

48.0%

45.5% 45.6%

22.0%27.7% 28.2%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1.5% 1.5% 0.8%

11.5%7.6%

5.3%

53.8%

52.7%50.8%

33.1%38.2%

43.2%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Mountain View SRI Grade 2 2012 – 2013


10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

37.5%31.0%

14.9%

20.5%

17.2%

23.0%

30.7%

34.5%

37.9%

11.4%17.2%

24.1%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

IMPRESSIVE GAIN



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

13.0% 12.9%6.9%

21.7%17.1%

19.4%

47.8%

48.6%47.2%

17.4%21.4%

26.4%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

11.0%6.6% 4.4%

14.3%15.4%

11.0%

53.8%

49.5%

51.6%

20.9%28.6%

33.0%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1.1% 1.1% 2.1%

14.7%10.5% 6.4%

58.9%

54.7%55.3%

25.3%33.7% 36.2%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

SandShore SRI Grade 2 2012 – 2013


10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

16.4%

5.5%9.4%

25.5%

12.7% 3.8%

47.3%

58.2%

50.9%

10.9%

23.6%

35.8%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

IMPRESSIVE GAIN



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4.8% 6.3% 6.3%

29.0%20.3%

14.1%

50.0%

53.1%

53.1%

16.1%20.3%

26.6%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

7.4% 5.8% 2.9%

16.2%14.5%

14.5%

54.4%56.5%

46.4%

22.1% 23.2%

36.2%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

IMPRESSIVE GAIN



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2.7% 2.6% 2.7%

9.3%5.3% 6.7%

49.3% 55.3% 53.3%

38.7% 36.8% 37.3%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Tinc Rd. SRI Grade 2 2012 – 2013


10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

36.1%

25.0%

13.9%

23.6%

13.9%

13.9%

33.3%

45.8%

45.8%

6.9%15.3%

26.4%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

IMPRESSIVE GAIN



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

11.0% 9.6%5.5%

27.4%23.3%

17.8%

45.2%

45.2%

50.7%

16.4%21.9%

26.0%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

8.7% 6.8% 4.8%

20.4%

11.7% 13.5%

51.5%

55.3% 52.9%

19.4%26.2% 28.8%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic



10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

6.5% 3.9% 3.9%

3.9% 6.6% 5.2%

46.8%50.0%

45.5%

42.9% 39.5%45.5%

Advanced Proficient

Proficient

Basic

Below Basic

Reading Comprehension resultsby Multi-year COHORTS

Examining SRI by cohorts (following the same students scores over time) yields an impressive long view of reading skills. The 2009 group of second graders for instance produced an aggregate gain of 652 lexile points by the middle of their fifth grade year on the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) test.

All tested groups seem to hover in the 1000 to 1050 lexile range by the time the students reached middle school age.

Elementary 3 Year CohortOctober 2009 to November 2012

Octobe

r. 200

9

Janu

ary. 2

010

April.

2010

June

. 201

0

Octobe

r. 201

0

Janu

ary. 2

011

Marc

h. 20

11

June

2011

Sept

embe

r 201

1

Novem

ber. 2

011

Febr

uary

.2012

April.

201

2

Sept

embe

r. 201

2

Novem

ber.2

012

0.0

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0

1000.0

1200.0

675.6724.4

769.7796.6

824.6868.8

918.6 941.0 946.8974.7 986.3

1015.4 1030.1 1049.6

538.2597.6

648.7689.1

717.5767.4

830.2869.4

907.3936.5

965.1992.1 995.6 1009.3

286.7

390.1

484.9

568.3 580.5642.5

697.9738.1

772.7 798.3832.2

866.9915.9 938.5

2009-10 4th Grade 2009-10 3rd Grade 2009-10 2nd Grade


Middle school readers produced increased comprehension scores on the SRI as well from first to second administration of the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) test. About half of all middle school students scored in the “advanced proficient” range on the SRI.

Middle School 2nd Quarter Proficiency Growth

September 2012 November 2012 September 2012 November 2012 September 2012 November 2012Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1.5% 1.5%5.6% 4.3% 4.9% 6.3%

14.3% 12.6%

14.6%13.1% 13.2% 12.0%

41.4%41.0%

35.0%32.6%

35.4% 33.1%

42.7% 44.8% 44.8%50.0% 46.5% 48.6%

AP

P

B

BB

Middle School Cohort October 2010 to November 2012

1st Admin. 2nd Admin. 3rd Admin. 4th Admin. 5th Admin. 6th Admin. 7th Admin. 8th Admin. 9th Admin. 10th Admin.800.0

850.0

900.0

950.0

1000.0

1050.0

1100.0

929.5

975.4965.7

992.9

1023.01034.1

1054.3

1092.4 1090.0 1091.5

947.9

963.1

986.2

1015.51028.9

1049.6

995.51009.3

2010-11 6th Grade 2011-12 6th Grade 2012-13 6th Grade


The results of multi-year COHORTs on the SRI (Scholastic Reading Inventory) indicate substantial progress in the attainment of reading comprehension skills.

District SRI Cohort 2009 - 2013

1st Ad-min.

2nd Admin.

3rd Admin.

4th Admin.

5th Admin.

6th Admin.

7th Admin.

8th Admin.

9th Admin.

10th Admin.

11th Admin.

12th Admin.

13th Admin.

14th Admin.

15th Admin.

150.0

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

1050.0

286.7

390.1484.9

568.3580.5

642.5697.9 738.1

772.7798.3

832.2866.9

915.9 936.4 957.6

264.4352.3

432.7

2009-10 2nd Grade 2010-11 2nd Grade 2011-12 2nd Grade 2012-13 2nd Grade1st

Admin.2nd

Admin.3rd

Admin.4th

Admin.5th

Admin.6th

Admin.7th

Admin.8th

Admin.9th

Admin.10th

Admin.11th

Admin.12th

Admin.13th

Admin.14th

Admin.15th

Admin.2009-10 2nd Grade 286.7 390.1 484.9 568.3 580.5 642.5 697.9 738.1 772.7 798.3 832.2 866.9 915.9 936.4 957.62010-11 2nd Grade 250.6 357.9 473.1 548.5 561.0 586.3 629.5 669.5 723.9 756.0 787.6 2011-12 2nd Grade 254.8 364.4 456.3 546.3 593.0 623.7 665.3 2012-13 2nd Grade 264.4 352.3 432.7

Chester M. Stephens SRI Cohort 2009 - 2013

1st Ad-min.

2nd Admin.

3rd Admin.

4th Admin.

5th Admin.

6th Admin.

7th Admin.

8th Admin.

9th Admin.

10th Admin.

11th Admin.

12th Admin.

13th Admin.

14th Admin.

15th Admin.

150.0

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

1050.0

283.9

394.1478.7

595.1

576.9626.4

687.1725.3

758.7784.1

824.2866.8

915.1945.3 965.6

234.1

324.1

404.7


Admin.2nd

Admin.3rd

Admin.4th

Admin.5th

Admin.6th

Admin.7th

Admin.8th

Admin.9th

Admin.10th

Admin.11th

Admin.12th

Admin.13th

Admin.14th

Admin.15th

Admin.2009-10 2nd Grade 283.9 394.1 478.7 595.1 576.9 626.4 687.1 725.3 758.7 784.1 824.2 866.8 915.1 945.3 965.62010-11 2nd Grade 249.8 368.8 500.6 576.2 578.1 606.3 643.8 674.0 729.9 751.0 769.6 2011-12 2nd Grade 294.2 385.5 496.6 588.7 627.6 673.5 700.5 2012-13 2nd Grade 234.1 324.1 404.7

Mountain View SRI Cohort 2009 - 2013

1st Ad-min.

2nd Admin.

3rd Admin.

4th Admin.

5th Admin.

6th Admin.

7th Admin.

8th Admin.

9th Admin.

10th Admin.

11th Admin.

12th Admin.

13th Admin.

14th Admin.

15th Admin.

150.0

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

1050.0

263.4

368.1

469.2

542.3 574.3626.6

686.7731.0

776.8 792.9810.3 840.3

893.8916.7

944.0

268.2

327.8

412.3


Admin.2nd

Admin.3rd

Admin.4th

Admin.5th

Admin.6th

Admin.7th

Admin.8th

Admin.9th

Admin.10th

Admin.11th

Admin.12th

Admin.13th

Admin.14th

Admin.15th

Admin.2009-10 2nd Grade 263.4 368.1 469.2 542.3 574.3 626.6 686.7 731.0 776.8 792.9 810.3 840.3 893.8 916.7 9442010-11 2nd Grade 287.9 357.6 465.3 530.7 572.2 580.6 621.3 660.6 722.0 771.4 801.4 2011-12 2nd Grade 254.8 359.4 440.7 531.3 596.7 641.0 2012-13 2nd Grade 268.2 327.8 412.3

Sandshore SRI Cohort 2009 - 2013

1st Ad-min.

2nd Admin.

3rd Admin.

4th Admin.

5th Admin.

6th Admin.

7th Admin.

8th Admin.

9th Admin.

10th Admin.

11th Admin.

12th Admin.

13th Admin.

14th Admin.

15th Admin.

150

250

350

450

550

650

750

850

950

1050

296.8

415.1

508.5

586.9 581.7

642.3

709.3742.8

774.4803.1

831.4871.7

929.5 940 954.5

351.5

454.7

526.5


Admin.2nd

Admin.3rd

Admin.4th

Admin.5th

Admin.6th

Admin.7th

Admin.8th

Admin.9th

Admin.10th

Admin.11th

Admin.12th

Admin.13th

Admin.14th

Admin.15th

Admin.2009-10 2nd Grade 296.8 415.1 508.5 586.9 581.7 642.3 709.3 742.8 774.4 803.1 831.4 871.7 929.5 940 954.52010-11 2nd Grade 273.0 373.3 462.9 535.5 551.4 584.3 643.4 681.9 726.0 748.7 796.1 2011-12 2nd Grade 257.7 370.7 452.4 519.7 595.7 615.7 655.1 2012-13 2nd Grade 351.5 454.7 526.5

Tinc Rd. SRI Cohort 2009 - 2013

1st Ad-min.

2nd Admin.

3rd Admin.

4th Admin.

5th Admin.

6th Admin.

7th Admin.

8th Admin.

9th Admin.

10th Admin.

11th Admin.

12th Admin.

13th Admin.

14th Admin.

15th Admin.

150.0

250.0

350.0

450.0

550.0

650.0

750.0

850.0

950.0

1050.0

312.1

388.7

495.9

590.9 599.3

694.2720.6

764.1 774.6812.4

851.6895.8

931.0 942.0 963.6


Admin.2nd

Admin.3rd

Admin.4th

Admin.5th

Admin.6th

Admin.7th

Admin.8th

Admin.9th

Admin.10th

Admin.11th

Admin.12th

Admin.13th

Admin.14th

Admin.15th

Admin.2009-10 2nd Grade 312.1 388.7 495.9 590.9 599.3 694.2 720.6 764.1 774.6 812.4 851.6 895.8 931.0 942 963.62010-11 2nd Grade 192.2 334.6 459.5 547.1 540 572 612.9 664.4 717.1 752.3 787.6 2011-12 2nd Grade 197 334.2 416.9 522.3 562.1 589.2 649.8 2012-13 2nd Grade 240.8 348.4 431.8

Reading Comprehension resultsDistrict TRENDLINES

Reading Comprehension trends for the Mount Olive schools are positive. Generally speaking, the longer students were in school, the better they were able to score on the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI exam). Second graders produced the greatest gains from pre to post test. Fifth graders produced the fewest gains.

District 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 2 Grade 3

September 2012 November 2012 January 20130.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

34.3%

23.2%

12.7%

8.9%

15.5%

24.7%

Below Basic Advanced Proficient


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

7.5% 7.5%

4.5%

20.5%

24.5%

29.9%


District 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 4 Grade 5


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

8.3%6.3%

4.4%

21.0%

26.6%

31.1%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2.7% 2.1% 2.1%

35.1%37.0%

40.7%


Reading Comprehension resultsCMS TRENDLINES

Reading Comprehension trends for students of the Chester M Stephens school were generally positive. The fourth grader trend was fairly flat however. The trend for “below basic” second grade student performances was substantially lower.

Chester M. Stephens 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 2 Grade 3


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0% 39.3%

24.6%

11.6%

7.1%

10.5%

18.8%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

2.9% 3.0%1.0%

27.9%

31.3%

37.4%


Chester M. Stephens 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 4 Grade 5


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

6.0% 5.9% 4.9%

22.0%

27.7% 28.2%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

1.5% 1.5% 0.8%

33.1%

38.2%

43.2%


Reading Comprehension resultsMountain View TRENDLINES

Reading Comprehension trends for students of the Mountain View school were positive. The trend for second grade “below basic” student performances was substantially lower.

Mountain View 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 2 Grade 3


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

37.5%

31.0%

14.9%

11.4%

17.2%

24.1%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

13.0% 12.9%

6.9%

17.4%

21.4%

26.4%


Mountain View 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 4 Grade 5


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

11.0%

6.6%4.4%

20.9%

28.6%

33.0%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

1.1% 1.1% 2.1%

25.3%

33.7%36.2%


Reading Comprehension resultsSandshoreTRENDLINES

Reading Comprehension trends for students of the Sandshore school were mixed. The trend for second grade “below basic” student performances spiked higher (at the same time that “advanced” performances rose considerably). Fifth grade “advanced performances fell flat.

Sand Shore 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 2 Grade 3


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

16.4%

5.5%

9.4%10.9%

23.6%

35.8%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

4.8%6.3% 6.3%

16.1%

20.3%

26.6%


Sand Shore 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 4 Grade 5


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

7.4%5.8%

2.9%

22.1%23.2%

36.2%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2.7% 2.6% 2.7%

38.7%36.8% 37.3%


Reading Comprehension resultsTinc Road TRENDLINES

Reading Comprehension trends for students of the Tinc Road school were positive. All grades performed well.

Tinc Rd. 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 2 Grade 3


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

36.1%

25.0%

13.9%

6.9%

15.3%

26.4%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

11.0%9.6%

5.5%

16.4%

21.9%

26.0%


Tinc Rd. 2012-2013 Q3Advanced Proficient v. Below Basic

Grade 4 Grade 5


5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

8.7%6.8%

4.8%

19.4%

26.2%28.8%



5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

6.5%3.9% 3.9%

42.9%

39.5%

45.5%


SECOND QUARTER GRADESMOMS

A distribution chart of Mount Olive middle school grades indicates that the most frequently occurring grade for 6th graders was an A (19.1% of all grades). The least occurring grade was an F (2.5%)

The most frequent grade for 7th graders was an A (20.4%). The least frequent grade was an F (4.6%)

The most frequent grade for eighth graders was a B (16.4%). The least frequent grade was aan A+ (3.1%).

Mount Olive Middle SchoolQ2 Grade Distribution – 6th Grade

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F

6th Grade 0.0425257731958763

0.190721649484536

0.152061855670103

0.134020618556701

0.163015463917526

0.0960051546391752

0.0760309278350518

0.0824742268041237

0.0380154639175258

0.0251288659793814

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

6th Grade



7th Grade 0.0824250681198913

0.204359673024523

0.130108991825613

0.110354223433243

0.133514986376022

0.102861035422343

0.0701634877384198

0.0742506811989102

0.0456403269754768

0.0463215258855586

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

7th Grade



8th Grade 0.0308988764044944

0.142556179775281

0.106039325842697

0.120786516853933

0.164325842696629

0.116573033707865

0.086376404494382

0.103230337078652

0.0568820224719101

0.0723314606741573

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

8th Grade

SECOND QUARTER GRADESMOMS (English)

A distribution chart of Mount Olive middle school grades indicates that the most frequently occurring grade for 6th graders in English was a B (19%); followed by an A- (18.6%) and an A (17.3%). The least frequent grade was an F (only 1.5% of 6th graders earned a grade of F).

The most frequent grade for 7th graders was A (18.6%). Around 14% earned grades of B- or B, the next most frequent grades. Around 2.4% of 7th grade students earned an F; the least frequent grade in the school.

The most frequent grade for eighth graders was a B (19.6%); followed by grades of B- (13.2%) and C (12.7%). Almost 6% of all 8th grade English grades were F’s. The least frequent grade was a C- (5%).

Mount Olive Middle SchoolQ2 ELA Grade Distribution


6th Grade

0.0127551020408163

0.173469387755103

0.186224489795919

0.158163265306123

0.191326530612245

0.0841836734693877

0.0688775510204082

0.0892857142857141

0.0204081632653061

0.0153061224489796

7th Grade

0.0585106382978724

0.186170212765957

0.125 0.11436170212766

0.140957446808511

0.146276595744681

0.0691489361702128

0.0797872340425534

0.0558510638297873

0.023936170212766

8th Grade

0.0275482093663912

0.112947658402204

0.0964187327823692

0.0909090909090911

0.195592286501378

0.132231404958678

0.110192837465565

0.126721763085399

0.0495867768595043

0.0578512396694215

1.0%3.0%5.0%7.0%9.0%

11.0%13.0%15.0%17.0%19.0%

6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F Total6th Grade 5 68 73 62 75 33 27 35 8 6 3927th Grade 22 70 47 43 53 55 26 30 21 9 3768th Grade 10 41 35 33 71 48 40 46 18 21 363

SECOND QUARTER GRADESMOMS (Math)

A distribution chart of Mount Olive middle school grades indicates that the most frequently occurring grade for 6th graders in Math was an A- (18.3%); followed by an B+ (14.2%) and a B (13.2%). The least frequent grade was an F (only 2.3% of 6th graders earned a grade of F).

The most frequent grade for 7th graders was an A (23.6%). Around 15% earned grades of A-. Thirteen percent earned a grade of B, the next most frequent grades. Around 1.6% of 7 th grade students earned an F. The least frequent grade in the school was a C- (1.1%)

The most frequent grade for eighth graders was an A (17.1%); followed by grades of B (14%) and an A-(11.1%). More than 7% of all 8th grade Math grades were F’s. The least frequent grade was a C- (7.1%).

Mount Olive Middle School Q2 Math Grade Distribution


6th Grade

0.068702290076336

0.18320610687023

0.119592875318066

0.142493638676845

0.132315521628499

0.094147582697201

0.0839694656488552

0.0916030534351145

0.0610687022900763

0.0229007633587786

7th Grade

0.0777479892761394

0.235924932975871

0.150134048257373

0.126005361930295

0.131367292225201

0.101876675603217

0.0804289544235925

0.0697050938337804

0.0107238605898124

0.0160857908847185

8th Grade

0.0571428571428571

0.171428571428571

0.111428571428572

0.0914285714285714

0.14 0.0971428571428571

0.0885714285714289

0.0971428571428571

0.0714285714285714

0.0742857142857143

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%



SECOND QUARTER GRADESMOMS (Science)

A distribution chart of Mount Olive middle school grades indicates that the most frequently occurring grade for 6th graders in Science was an B (20.3%); followed by an A- (14.6%) and a B- (14.1%). The least frequent grade was an F (only 4.9% of 6th graders earned a grade of F).

The most frequent grade for 7th graders was an A- (9.4%). Around 15% earned grades of A-. Twenty percent earned a grade of B, the next most frequent grades. Around 9.2% of 7 th grade students earned an F. The least frequent grade in the school was a C- (6.4%)

The most frequent grade for eighth graders was a B (14.8%); followed by grades of B+ (14.6%) and an B- (11.8%). More than 9% of all 8th grade Science grades were F’s. The least frequent grade was a C- (7.3%).

Mount Olive Middle School Q2 Science Grade Distribution


6th Grade

0.00520833333333335

0.0937500000000002

0.145833333333334

0.1171875 0.203125 0.140625 0.080729166666667

0.109375 0.0546875 0.0494791666666667

7th Grade

0.100278551532033

0.158774373259053

0.122562674094708

0.116991643454039

0.128133704735376

0.064066852367688

0.0752089136490251

0.0779944289693593

0.064066852367688

0.0919220055710309

8th Grade

0 0.103641456582633

0.11484593837535

0.145658263305322

0.148459383753502

0.117647058823529

0.0952380952380953

0.109243697478992

0.0728291316526611

0.092436974789916

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%



SECOND QUARTER GRADESMOMS (Social Studies)

A distribution chart of Mount Olive middle school grades indicates that the most frequently occurring grade for 6th graders in Social Studies was an A (31.3%); followed by an A- (15.7%) and a B+ (11.7%). The least frequent grade was an F (only 1.3% of 6th graders earned a grade of F).

The most frequent grade for 7th graders was an A (23.6%). Around 13% earned grades of B. Twelve percent earned a grade of A-, the next most frequent grades. Around 5.6% of 7th grade students earned an F. The least frequent grade in the school was a C- (5.3%)

The most frequent grade for eighth graders was an A (18.4%); followed by grades of B (17.2%) and an B+ (13.5%). More than 6% of all 8th grade Math grades were F’s. The least frequent grade was a C- (3.4%).

Mount Olive Middle School Q2 Social Studies Grade Distribution


6th Grade

0.0835509138381202

0.313315926892952

0.156657963446475

0.117493472584857

0.12532637075718

0.0652741514360313

0.070496083550914

0.0391644908616188

0.0156657963446475

0.0130548302872063

7th Grade

0.0944444444444445

0.236111111111111

0.122222222222223

0.0833333333333333

0.133333333333333

0.0972222222222222

0.0555555555555555

0.0694444444444445

0.0527777777777778

0.0555555555555555

8th Grade

0.0395480225988701

0.18361581920904

0.101694915254237

0.155367231638418

0.172316384180792

0.11864406779661

0.0508474576271187

0.0790960451977401

0.0338983050847458

0.0649717514124294

2.5%

7.5%

12.5%

17.5%

22.5%

27.5%

32.5%


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F Total6th Grade 32 120 60 45 48 25 27 15 6 5 3837th Grade 34 85 44 30 48 35 20 25 19 20 360

8th Grade 0 37 41 52 53 42 34 39 26 33 357

SECOND QUARTER GRADESMOHS

A distribution chart of Mount Olive High School grades indicates that the most frequently occurring grade for the second quarter of the year was an A (20.9%); followed by an A- (15.7%) and a B (14.6%). The least frequent grade was a C- (14.3%). Around 7% of all grades was an F.

The most frequent MIDTERM EXAM grade however was quite different. The most frequent midterm Exam grade was a B (14.6%). Around11% of the school students earned a grade of F on their Midterm exam.

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Total Population

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

8.2%

21.1

%

16.5

%

13.1

% 14.6

%

8.9%

5.0%

5.1%

3.4% 4.

0%

6.7%

20.0

%

15.7

%

12.0

%

14.6

%

8.7%

5.9%

5.7%

4.3%

6.6%

4.6%

12.5

%

11.8

%

11.1

%

14.6

%

10.1

%

7.9% 9.

3%

7.6%

10.6

%

Q1 Q2 M1

MOHS A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 896 2296 1789 1423 1586 968 544 554 367 438 10861Q2 706 2116 1664 1267 1543 924 624 604 452 696 10596M1 312 855 803 758 999 689 539 633 520 723 6831

SECOND QUARTER GRADESMOHS

The difference between the grade for the course and the midterm grade is depicted on the following slides by subject area. Generally, English and Social Studies grades are higher than Midterm exam grades for the same course. Science and Math grades are considerably lower however with many more failures on the Midterm exam. In both courses, the percentage of failing grades on the Midterm exam is the most frequent grade earned by MOHS students.

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Language Arts

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1.0%

15.9

%

19.4

%

16.3

%

16.9

%

10.1

%

6.2%

5.9%

3.9% 4.

5%

1.0%

17.1

%

17.5

%

14.5

% 16.4

%

9.0%

7.2%

6.9%

5.1% 5.3%

2.4%

11.0

%

11.6

%

17.5

% 18.9

%

11.8

%

8.9%

8.3%

4.8%

4.7%

Q1 Q2 M1

Lang Arts A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 15 236 288 242 251 151 92 88 58 67 1488Q2 15 250 256 211 239 131 105 100 74 78 1459M1 31 143 151 227 246 154 116 108 63 61 1300

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Mathematics

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

2.3%

12.5

%

15.3

%

13.9

%

17.5

%

13.6

%

7.2% 8.

1%

5.6%

4.0%

2.3%

11.6

% 13.4

%

12.3

%

19.0

%

13.4

%

6.6%

8.7%

7.0%

5.6%

5.2%

9.5%

8.2%

11.3

%

14.2

%

7.9%

8.0%

10.2

%

10.0

%

15.6

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Math A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 34 186 227 207 260 202 107 121 83 60 1487Q2 33 168 194 179 276 195 96 127 102 82 1452M1 62 114 98 136 171 95 96 123 120 187 1202

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Science

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

2.2%

16.9

%

17.2

%

13.3

%

18.3

%

11.1

%

6.8%

5.9%

4.2%

4.1%

2.3%

14.3

%

14.4

%

13.7

% 16.3

%

12.7

%

7.2%

6.7%

5.2%

7.1%

3.0%

9.5%

7.8% 8.

4%

12.6

%

10.1

%

9.1%

11.3

%

9.9%

18.4

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Science A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 32 244 249 192 265 161 98 86 61 59 1447Q2 33 202 203 193 231 179 102 95 74 101 1413M1 35 111 91 99 148 118 107 133 116 216 1174

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Social Studies

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

3.5%

16.8

%

17.2

%

16.8

%

19.5

%

11.1

%

5.1%

4.6%

2.9%

2.4%

4.1%

13.2

%

16.3

%

13.0

%

18.7

%

10.7

%

7.1%

7.1%

4.8%

5.0%

2.6%

11.2

%

12.3

%

9.7%

15.9

%

14.0

%

7.4%

11.3

%

9.7%

6.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

Social Studies A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 48 230 235 229 266 151 70 63 40 33 1365Q2 55 177 219 174 251 144 95 95 65 67 1342M1 29 126 139 109 179 158 84 127 109 68 1128

2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-20130

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

9th Grade10th Grade11th Grade12th Grade

9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade2009-2010 124 136 129 1172010-2011 163 110 176 1412011-2012 125 142 156 1572012-2013 176 120 173 160

2nd MP Honor Roll Comparison

Total506590580

629

SECOND QUARTER GRADESBy Course

Grade distributions by courses follows.

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Language & Composition

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

0.0%

22.9

%

37.1

%

14.3

%

14.3

%

5.7%

2.9%

2.9%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

5.9%

44.1

%

17.6

%

23.5

%

5.9%

2.9%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Q1 Q2

AP Language & Composition A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F Total

Q1 0 8 13 5 5 2 1 1 0 0 35Q2 0 2 15 6 8 2 1 0 0 0 34

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Literature & Composition

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

0.0

%

32

.4%

26

.5%

17

.6%

14

.7%

2.9

%

2.9

%

0.0

%

0.0

% 2.9

%

3.0

%

27

.3%

39

.4%

15

.2%

6.1

%

3.0

%

0.0

% 3.0

%

3.0

%

0.0

%

Q1 Q2

AP Literature & Composition A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F Total

Q1 0 11 9 6 5 1 1 0 0 1 34Q2 1 9 13 5 2 1 0 1 1 0 33

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13English 1

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

0.0%

3.1%

10.8

% 13.8

% 16.9

% 20.0

%

13.8

%

7.7% 9.

2%

4.6%

0.0%

6.3% 7.

9%

7.9%

12.7

%

12.7

%

11.1

%

11.1

%

14.3

%

15.9

%

1.6%

19.0

%

23.8

%

15.9

%

25.4

%

3.2%

1.6%

4.8%

3.2%

1.6%

Q1 Q2 M1

English I A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 2 7 9 11 13 9 5 6 3 65Q2 0 4 5 5 8 8 7 7 9 10 63M1 1 12 15 10 16 2 1 3 2 1 63

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13English 1 CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1.9%

14.2

%

17.9

%

18.4

% 20.3

%

9.9%

6.6%

4.2% 4.7%

1.9%

1.4%

10.0

%

18.0

%

11.4

%

16.1

%

8.5% 9.0%

8.5%

8.5%

8.5%

1.4%

9.0%

9.0%

17.6

%

18.1

%

10.0

% 11.4

%

11.9

%

4.3%

7.1%

Q1 Q2 M1

English I CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 4 30 38 39 43 21 14 9 10 4 212Q2 3 21 38 24 34 18 19 18 18 18 211M1 3 19 19 37 38 21 24 25 9 15 210

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13English 1 Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

6.0%

52.2

%

26.9

%

11.9

%

3.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

5.9%

41.2

%

30.9

%

10.3

%

7.4%

1.5%

1.5%

0.0% 1.

5%

0.0%

0.0%

25.0

%

16.2

% 20.6

%

23.5

%

7.4%

4.4%

1.5%

1.5%

0.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

English I H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 4 35 18 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 67Q2 4 28 21 7 5 1 1 0 1 0 68M1 0 17 11 14 16 5 3 1 1 0 68


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

0.0%

2.9%

17.1

%

11.4

% 14.3

%

5.7%

8.6%

17.1

%

8.6%

14.3

%

0.0%

6.5%

12.9

%

29.0

%

22.6

%

6.5%

3.2%

6.5%

6.5%

6.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

20.0

%

6.7%

16.7

%

3.3%

23.3

%

6.7%

23.3

%

Q1 Q2 M1

English II A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 1 6 4 5 2 3 6 3 5 35Q2 0 2 4 9 7 2 1 2 2 2 31M1 0 0 0 6 2 5 1 7 2 7 30


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.5%

4.3%

9.7%

9.2%

24.3

%

13.0

%

7.0%

10.8

%

6.5%

14.6

%

0.0%

8.6%

11.2

% 13.4

%

20.3

%

11.2

% 12.8

%

10.2

%

5.3%

7.0%

1.1%

7.0% 8.

0%

11.8

%

21.4

%

12.3

%

8.6%

13.4

%

12.3

%

4.3%

Q1 Q2 M1

English II CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 8 18 17 45 24 13 20 12 27 185Q2 0 16 21 25 38 21 24 19 10 13 187M1 2 13 15 22 40 23 16 25 23 8 187


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0.9%

7.0%

23.7

%

29.8

%

22.8

%

10.5

%

2.6%

1.8%

0.9%

0.0%

0.0%

17.0

% 19.6

%

24.1

%

16.1

%

12.5

%

4.5% 5.

4%

0.9%

0.0%1.

8%

30.4

%

14.3

%

26.8

%

6.3% 7.

1%

6.3%

3.6%

2.7%

0.9%

Q1 Q2 M1

English II H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 8 27 34 26 12 3 2 1 0 114Q2 0 19 22 27 18 14 5 6 1 0 112M1 2 34 16 30 7 8 7 4 3 1 112


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

0.0%

5.4%

16.2

%

13.5

%

27.0

%

5.4%

2.7%

13.5

%

8.1%

8.1%

0.0%

0.0%

2.9%

14.7

% 17.6

%

5.9%

17.6

%

14.7

% 17.6

%

8.8%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

6.1%

9.1%

15.2

%

12.1

%

18.2

%

12.1

%

27.3

%

Q1 Q2 M1

English III A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 2 6 5 10 2 1 5 3 3 37Q2 0 0 1 5 6 2 6 5 6 3 34M1 0 0 0 2 3 5 4 6 4 9 33


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%

0.0

%

8.3

%

18

.2%

18

.2%

18

.2%

18

.2%

7.8

%

6.8

%

2.1

%

2.1

%

0.0

%

15

.3%

13

.2% 1

5.3

%

15

.3%

12

.7%

9.5

%

6.9

%

6.3

%

5.3

%

4.7

%

6.8

%

12

.6%

20

.0%

20

.0%

16

.3%

10

.5%

4.2

%

1.6

% 3.2

%

Q1 Q2 M1

English III CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 16 35 35 35 35 15 13 4 4 192Q2 0 29 25 29 29 24 18 13 12 10 189M1 9 13 24 38 38 31 20 8 3 6 190


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0.0%

25.6

%

30.5

%

18.3

%

15.9

%

2.4%

4.9%

1.2%

0.0% 1.

2%

0.0%

31.7

%

25.6

%

9.8%

23.2

%

6.1%

1.2%

1.2%

0.0% 1.

2%

9.9%

7.4%

13.6

%

3.7%

22.2

%

18.5

%

14.8

%

4.9%

3.7%

1.2%

Q1 Q2 M1

English III H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 21 25 15 13 2 4 1 0 1 82Q2 0 26 21 8 19 5 1 1 0 1 82M1 8 6 11 3 18 15 12 4 3 1 81


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.0%

0.0%

5.0%

2.5%

12.5

%

17.5

%

17.5

% 20.0

% 22.5

%

2.5%

0.0%

2.7%

8.1%

8.1%

10.8

%

10.8

%

13.5

%

16.2

%

13.5

%

16.2

%

0.0%

5.4%

13.5

%

18.9

%

21.6

%

10.8

%

8.1%

5.4%

2.7%

13.5

%

Q1 Q2 M1

English IV A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 0 2 1 5 7 7 8 9 1 40Q2 0 1 3 3 4 4 5 6 5 6 37M1 0 2 5 7 8 4 3 2 1 5 37


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1.1%

16.1

%

16.7

%

14.4

%

15.5

%

10.9

%

8.0% 8.

6%

3.4%

5.2%

1.2%

20.2

%

15.6

%

13.3

%

17.3

%

8.7%

6.9%

6.9%

3.5%

6.4%

2.4%

10.0

%

12.9

%

18.2

% 20.0

%

14.1

%

7.1% 8.

2%

4.1%

2.9%

Q1 Q2 M1

English IV CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 28 29 25 27 19 14 15 6 9 174Q2 2 35 27 23 30 15 12 12 6 11 173M1 4 17 22 31 34 24 12 14 7 5 170


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

1.2%

28.0

%

37.8

%

22.0

%

7.3%

1.2%

1.2%

0.0%

0.0% 1.

2%

1.2%

29.3

%

23.2

%

22.0

%

11.0

%

6.1%

4.9%

1.2%

0.0% 1.

2%

0.0%

8.5%

8.5%

25.6

%

24.4

%

11.0

%

12.2

%

4.9%

3.7%

1.2%

Q1 Q2 M1

English IV H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 23 31 18 6 1 1 0 0 1 82Q2 1 24 19 18 9 5 4 1 0 1 82M1 0 7 7 21 20 9 10 4 3 1 82

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Language Arts Workshop 9

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

0.0

%

53.

8%

15.

4%

15.

4%

15.

4%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

16.

7%

58.

3%

16.

7%

8.3

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

58.

3%

25.

0%

16.

7%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

Q1 Q2 F1

Language Arts Workshop 9 A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F Total

Q1 0 7 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 13Q2 2 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12F1 0 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0.0

%

4.0

%

24

.0%

12

.0%

20

.0%

4.0

%

12

.0%

0.0

%

12

.0%

12

.0%

0.0

%

4.3

%

13

.0%

13

.0%

34

.8%

21

.7%

0.0

%

4.3

%

4.3

%

4.3

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

17

.4%

30

.4%

17

.4%

0.0

%

17

.4%

0.0

%

17

.4%

0.0

%

Q1 Q2 F1


Q1 0 1 6 3 5 1 3 0 3 3 25Q2 0 1 3 3 8 5 0 1 1 1 23F1 0 0 4 7 4 0 4 0 4 0 23


A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

0.0

%

33

.3%

16

.7%

50

.0%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

33

.3%

33

.3%

33

.3%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

50

.0%

0.0

%

50

.0%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

Q1 Q2 F1


Q1 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6Q2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6F1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Calculus AB

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

0.0

%

17

.8%

22

.2%

11.1

%

26

.7%

11.1

%

4.4

% 6.7

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

18

.2%

18

.2%

18

.2%

29

.5%

9.1

%

2.3

%

2.3

%

0.0

% 2.3

%4.5

%

18

.2%

6.8

%

6.8

%

15

.9%

9.1

%

6.8

%

13

.6%

6.8

%

11.4

%

Q1 Q2 M1

AP Calculus AB A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 8 10 5 12 5 2 3 0 0 45Q2 0 8 8 8 13 4 1 1 0 1 44M1 2 8 3 3 7 4 3 6 3 5 44

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Calculus BC

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

11.8

%

17.6

%

29.4

%

0.0%

17.6

%

11.8

%

5.9%

0.0%

5.9%

0.0%

5.9%

11.8

%

11.8

%

17.6

%

0.0%

23.5

%

5.9%

11.8

%

5.9%

5.9%

Q1 Q2

AP Calculus BC A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 3 5 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 17Q2 1 2 2 3 0 4 1 2 1 1 17

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Statistics

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

14.3

%

31.0

%

21.4

%

9.5%

16.7

%

7.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

24.4

%

19.5

%

19.5

%

24.4

%

7.3%

2.4%

0.0%

0.0%

2.4%

Q1 Q2

AP Statistics A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 6 13 9 4 7 3 0 0 0 0 42Q2 0 10 8 8 10 3 1 0 0 1 41

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Geometry Essentials

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

0.0%

0.0%

10.0

%

0.0%

15.0

%

10.0

%

20.0

%

20.0

%

15.0

%

10.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

10.0

%

15.0

%

35.0

%

10.0

%

15.0

%

5.0%

10.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

5.9%

0.0%

5.9%

5.9%

11.8

%

17.6

%

11.8

%

41.2

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Essentials of Geometry A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 0 2 0 3 2 4 4 3 2 20Q2 0 0 0 2 3 7 2 3 1 2 20M1 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 3 2 7 17

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Geometry CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.5%

2.0%

8.9% 9.4%

15.8

%

19.2

%

11.8

%

11.3

%

7.9%

13.3

%

0.0%

1.5%

9.0%

11.5

%

22.5

%

20.0

%

7.5%

10.5

%

10.0

%

7.5%

3.0%

7.5%8.5%

10.9% 10.9%

9.0%10.0%

11.4%

8.0%

20.9%

Q1

Q2

M1

Geometry CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 4 18 19 32 39 24 23 16 27 203Q2 0 3 18 23 45 40 15 21 20 15 200M1 6 15 17 22 22 18 20 23 16 42 201

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Geometry Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1.8%

14.7

%

20.2

%

21.1

%

20.2

%

11.0

%

6.4%

2.8%

0.0%

1.8%

4.6%

18.5

%

13.0

%

19.4

%

18.5

%

10.2

%

2.8%

5.6%

4.6%

2.8%

0.9%

5.6%

9.3%

11.1

%

20.4

%

6.5%

9.3%

12.0

%

9.3%

15.7

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Geometry H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 16 22 23 22 12 7 3 0 2 109Q2 5 20 14 21 20 11 3 6 5 3 108M1 1 6 10 12 22 7 10 13 10 17 108

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Algebra I CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%

0.0

%

12.

9%

12.

9%

19.

3%

16.

4%

11.4

%

9.3

%

11.4

%

3.6

%

2.9

%

0.0

%

8.8

%

8.1

%

7.4

%

14.

7%

15.

4%

13.

2% 14.

7%

6.6

%

11.0

%

1.5

%

5.2

%

8.9

% 9.6

%

13.

3% 14.

8%

8.1

% 8.9

%

11.1

%

18.

5%

Q1 Q2 M1

Algebra I CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 18 18 27 23 16 13 16 5 4 140Q2 0 12 11 10 20 21 18 20 9 15 136M1 2 7 12 13 18 20 11 12 15 25 135

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Algebra II

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.0%

0.0%

22.2

%

11.1

% 13.3

%

17.8

%

8.9%

11.1

%

8.9%

6.7%

0.0%

5.0%

5.0%

10.0

%

10.0

%

15.0

% 17.5

%

15.0

%

12.5

%

10.0

%

5.1%

12.8

%

5.1%

7.7%

7.7%

5.1%

10.3

%

15.4

% 17.9

%

12.8

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Algebra II A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 0 10 5 6 8 4 5 4 3 45Q2 0 2 2 4 4 6 7 6 5 4 40M1 2 5 2 3 3 2 4 6 7 5 39

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Algebra II CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.0%

11.2

%

9.8%

16.1

%

19.6

%

15.4

%

5.6%

9.8% 10

.5%

2.1%

1.4%

5.7%

13.6

% 15.0

%

22.9

%

7.1%

5.7% 7.

1%

13.6

%

7.9%

4.3%

10.0

%

4.3%

11.4

%

22.1

%

6.4%

5.7%

11.4

%

7.1%

17.1

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Algebra II CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 16 14 23 28 22 8 14 15 3 143Q2 2 8 19 21 32 10 8 10 19 11 140M1 6 14 6 16 31 9 8 16 10 24 140

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Algebra II Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

1.4%

28.4

% 31.1

%

17.6

%

13.5

%

4.1%

1.4%

1.4%

0.0% 1.

4%

12.2

%

21.6

%

16.2

% 18.9

%

10.8

%

10.8

%

2.7% 4.

1%

2.7%

0.0%

12.3

% 15.1

%

12.3

%

17.8

%

12.3

%

4.1%

6.8%

2.7%

9.6%

6.8%

Q1 Q2 M1

Algebra II H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 21 23 13 10 3 1 1 0 1 74Q2 9 16 12 14 8 8 2 3 2 0 74M1 9 11 9 13 9 3 5 2 7 5 73

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13PreCalculus CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

3.4%

11.5

%

9.2%

8.6%

20.7

%

17.2

%

12.1

%

9.2%

6.9%

1.1%

5.8%

13.9

%

11.6

%

9.2%

15.0

%

18.5

%

3.5%

9.2%

6.9%

6.4%

4.7%

8.8% 9.

4%

15.3

%

12.4

%

5.9%

10.0

%

10.0

%

8.8%

14.7

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Pre-Calculus CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 6 20 16 15 36 30 21 16 12 2 174Q2 10 24 20 16 26 32 6 16 12 11 173M1 8 15 16 26 21 10 17 17 15 25 170

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13PreCalculus Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1.0

%

16

.7%

21

.9%

21

.9%

25

.0%

7.3

%

1.0

% 3.1

%

1.0

%

1.0

%

4.4

%

11.1

%

21

.1%

15

.6%

24

.4%

13

.3%

2.2

% 3.3

%

3.3

%

1.1

%

8.9

%

18

.9%

8.9

%

13

.3%

18

.9%

10

.0%

6.7

%

5.6

% 6.7

%

2.2

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Pre-Calculus H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 16 21 21 24 7 1 3 1 1 96Q2 4 10 19 14 22 12 2 3 3 1 90M1 8 17 8 12 17 9 6 5 6 2 90

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Calculus CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.0%

6.9%

10.3

%

11.5

%

20.7

%

21.8

%

6.9%

10.3

%

8.0%

3.4%

0.0%

6.9%

18.4

%

9.2%

23.0

%

16.1

%

6.9%

11.5

%

4.6%

3.4%

0.0%

7.0%

9.3%

11.6

%

10.5

%

8.1%

8.1%

10.5

%

23.3

%

11.6

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Calculus CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 6 9 10 18 19 6 9 7 3 87Q2 0 6 16 8 20 14 6 10 4 3 87M1 0 6 8 10 9 7 7 9 20 10 86

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Probability & Statistics CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

15.2

%

37.0

%

13.0

%

8.7%

13.0

%

8.7%

0.0%

0.0%

4.3%

0.0%2.

2%

30.4

%

13.0

%

6.5%

17.4

%

6.5%

6.5%

6.5%

2.2%

8.7%

37.0

%

17.4

%

4.3%

4.3%

8.7%

6.5%

0.0%

4.3%

8.7%

8.7%

Q1 Q2 M1

Probability & Statistics CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 7 17 6 4 6 4 0 0 2 0 46Q2 1 14 6 3 8 3 3 3 1 4 46M1 17 8 2 2 4 3 0 2 4 4 46

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Probability CP (Semester)

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

10

.0%

20

.0%

20

.0%

15

.0%

5.0

%

20

.0%

0.0

%

10

.0%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

25

.0%

25

.0%

10

.0% 1

5.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

10

.0% 1

5.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

12

.5%

0.0

%

0.0

%

12

.5%

12

.5%

12

.5%

0.0

%

50

.0%

Q1 Q2 X1

Probability CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 4 4 3 1 4 0 2 0 0 20Q2 0 5 5 2 3 0 0 2 3 0 20X1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 4 8

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Biology

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

0.0

%

20

.0% 2

4.0

%

8.0

%

16

.0%

12

.0%

8.0

%

0.0

%

8.0

%

4.0

%

4.0

%

44

.0%

8.0

%

8.0

%

16

.0%

4.0

%

0.0

%

8.0

%

8.0

%

0.0

%

4.0

%

4.0

%

16

.0%

12

.0% 1

6.0

%

8.0

%

4.0

%

8.0

%

8.0

%

20

.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

AP Biology A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 5 6 2 4 3 2 0 2 1 25Q2 1 11 2 2 4 1 0 2 2 0 25M1 1 1 4 3 4 2 1 2 2 5 25

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Chemistry

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

0.0%

62.5

%

6.3%

18.8

%

0.0%

6.3%

6.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

31.3

%

18.8

% 25.0

%

6.3%

0.0%

6.3%

6.3%

0.0%

6.3%

Q1 Q2

AP Chemistry A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 10 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 16Q2 0 5 3 4 1 0 1 1 0 1 16

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Environmental Science

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

0.0%

38.9

%

22.2

%

22.2

%

11.1

%

5.6%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

38.9

%

22.2

%

16.7

%

0.0%

16.7

%

5.6%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Q1 Q2

AP Environmental Science A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 7 4 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 18Q2 0 7 4 3 0 3 1 0 0 0 18

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP Physics C

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

6.3%

31.3

%

43.8

%

0.0%

12.5

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

6.3%

0.0%

6.3%

6.3%

18.8

%

6.3%

37.5

%

12.5

%

0.0%

6.3%

6.3%

0.0%

Q1 Q2

AP Physics C A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 5 7 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 16Q2 1 1 3 1 6 2 0 1 1 0 16

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Astronomy CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

4.8%

9.5%

19.0

%

19.0

%

9.5%

4.8%

9.5%

14.3

%

9.5%

0.0%

0.0%

19.0

%

23.8

%

4.8%

0.0%

9.5%

4.8%

19.0

%

9.5%

9.5%

4.8%

9.5%

28.6

%

0.0%

9.5%

14.3

%

4.8%

14.3

%

14.3

%

0.0%

7.1%

0.0%

7.1%

14.3

%

7.1%

14.3

%

0.0%

21.4

%

21.4

%

7.1%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Astronomy CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 2 4 4 2 1 2 3 2 0 21Q2 0 4 5 1 0 2 1 4 2 2 21F1 1 2 6 0 2 3 1 3 3 0 21X1 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 3 3 1 14

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Biology

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

0.0%

9.5%

9.5%

7.9%

23.8

%

19.0

%

4.8%

11.1

%

12.7

%

1.6%

1.7% 3.

4%

1.7% 5.

1%

18.6

%

16.9

%

16.9

%

16.9

%

11.9

%

6.8%

0.0%

0.0% 1.

7% 3.4%

3.4%

8.5%

3.4%

10.2

%

18.6

%

50.8

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Biology A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 6 6 5 15 12 3 7 8 1 63Q2 1 2 1 3 11 10 10 10 7 4 59M1 0 0 1 2 2 5 2 6 11 30 59

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Biology CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0.0%

14.3

%

32.8

%

11.8

%

26.1

%

8.4%

0.0%

4.2%

0.8% 1.

7%

0.0%

4.1%

9.9% 10

.7%

28.9

%

19.8

%

4.1%

7.4% 8.

3%

6.6%

0.0% 0.

8%

3.3%

5.8%

18.2

%

16.5

%

11.6

%

18.2

%

15.7

%

9.9%

Q1 Q2 M1

Biology Lab CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 17 39 14 31 10 0 5 1 2 119Q2 0 5 12 13 35 24 5 9 10 8 121M1 0 1 4 7 22 20 14 22 19 12 121

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Biology Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

2.8%

27.8

%

25.0

%

11.1

%

16.7

%

8.3%

5.6%

2.8%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

17.1

%

25.7

%

14.3

%

22.9

%

14.3

%

2.9%

2.9%

0.0%

0.0%

14.3

%

8.6%

20.0

%

2.9%

14.3

%

8.6%

11.4

%

8.6%

5.7%

5.7%

Q1 Q2 M1

Biology H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 10 9 4 6 3 2 1 0 0 36Q2 0 6 9 5 8 5 1 1 0 0 35M1 5 3 7 1 5 3 4 3 2 2 35

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Chemistry Lab – A CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.0%

7.0%

13.5

%

21.0

%

18.5

%

15.0

%

10.0

%

8.5%

4.0%

2.5%

0.0%

15.2

%

13.2

% 15.2

% 16.8

%

13.7

%

9.1%

5.6%

5.1% 6.

1%

0.5%

9.1%

9.1%

13.2

% 14.7

%

8.6%

11.7

%

11.7

%

5.6%

15.7

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Chemistry Lab A -CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 14 27 42 37 30 20 17 8 5 200Q2 0 30 26 30 33 27 18 11 10 12 197M1 1 18 18 26 29 17 23 23 11 31 197

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Chemistry Lab – B CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

0.0%

7.2%

6.0%

12.0

%

27.7

%

19.3

%

8.4%

7.2%

4.8%

7.2%

0.0%

2.5%

1.3%

7.6%

27.8

%

20.3

%

15.2

%

7.6%

6.3%

11.4

%

0.0%

6.3%

1.3% 2.

5%

11.4

%

6.3%

6.3%

17.7

%

10.1

%

38.0

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Chemistry Lab B - CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 6 5 10 23 16 7 6 4 6 83Q2 0 2 1 6 22 16 12 6 5 9 79M1 0 5 1 2 9 5 5 14 8 30 79

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Chemistry Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

2.4

%

29

.8%

26

.8%

16

.1%

16

.7%

5.4

%

0.6

% 2.4

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

5.4

%

18

.6%

22

.2%

15

.6%

20

.4%

4.8

%

4.8

%

4.8

%

2.4

%

1.2

%

0.6

%

9.0

%

8.4

%

7.8

%

12

.6%

10

.8%

12

.6%

13

.2%

6.6

%

18

.6%

Q1 Q2 M1

Chemistry Lab H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 4 50 45 27 28 9 1 4 0 0 168Q2 9 31 37 26 34 8 8 8 4 2 167M1 1 15 14 13 21 18 21 22 11 31 167

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Earth Science

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

6.0

%

22

.0%

10

.0%

8.0

%

24

.0%

10

.0% 12

.0%

4.0

%

2.0

%

2.0

%4.3

%

0.0

%

12

.8%

10

.6%

14

.9%

12

.8%

12

.8%

8.5

% 10

.6% 12

.8%

2.1

%

2.1

%

8.5

%

8.5

%

8.5

%

2.1

%

10

.6%

10

.6%

17

.0%

29

.8%

Q1 Q2 M1

Earth Science A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 3 11 5 4 12 5 6 2 1 1 50Q2 2 0 6 5 7 6 6 4 5 6 47M1 1 1 4 4 4 1 5 5 8 14 47

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Environmental Science

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

0.0

%

16

.7%

5.6

%

11.1

%

16

.7%

11.1

%

16

.7%

5.6

%

5.6

%

11.1

%

0.0

%

22

.2%

5.6

%

5.6

%

0.0

%

11.1

%

11.1

%

5.6

%

5.6

%

33

.3%

0.0

%

16

.7%

11.1

%

5.6

%

5.6

%

5.6

%

11.1

%

11.1

%

5.6

%

27

.8%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

7.1

%

7.1

%

14

.3%

0.0

%

21

.4%

0.0

%

50

.0%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Environmental Science CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 3 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 2 18Q2 0 4 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 6 18F1 0 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 5 18X1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 7 14

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Forensics

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

3.4%

22.4

%

17.2

%

13.8

%

3.4%

5.2%

5.2%

5.2%

5.2%

19.0

%

0.0%

21.8

%

16.4

% 18.2

%

3.6%

14.5

%

0.0%

3.6%

3.6%

18.2

%

0.0%

21.8

%

21.8

%

9.1%

7.3%

7.3%

7.3%

7.3%

7.3%

10.9

%

0.0%

12.8

%

12.8

%

5.1%

17.9

%

15.4

%

5.1%

7.7%

10.3

% 12.8

%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Forensic Science CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 13 10 8 2 3 3 3 3 11 58Q2 0 12 9 10 2 8 0 2 2 10 55F1 0 12 12 5 4 4 4 4 4 6 55X1 0 5 5 2 7 6 2 3 4 5 39

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Human Anatomy & Physiology

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

8.9%

35.6

%

22.2

%

13.3

%

8.9%

4.4% 6.

7%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

6.7%

26.7

%

15.6

%

20.0

%

20.0

%

2.2%

0.0%

4.4%

4.4%

0.0%2.

2%

15.6

%

26.7

%

8.9%

15.6

%

13.3

%

6.7%

4.4%

4.4%

2.2%

Q1 Q2 M1

Human Anatomy & Phys - H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 4 16 10 6 4 2 3 0 0 0 45Q2 3 12 7 9 9 1 0 2 2 0 45M1 1 7 12 4 7 6 3 2 2 1 45

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Meteorology

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0.0%

12.5

%

4.2%

8.3%

33.3

%

16.7

%

4.2%

8.3%

4.2%

8.3%

0.0%

8.7%

17.4

%

17.4

%

4.3%

8.7%

4.3%

26.1

%

4.3%

8.7%

0.0%

4.3%

17.4

%

0.0%

26.1

%

13.0

%

13.0

%

8.7%

13.0

%

4.3%4.8%

4.8%

9.5%

0.0%

9.5%

4.8%

14.3

%

23.8

%

4.8%

23.8

%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Meteorology CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 3 1 2 8 4 1 2 1 2 24Q2 0 2 4 4 1 2 1 6 1 2 23F1 0 1 4 0 6 3 3 2 3 1 23X1 1 1 2 0 2 1 3 5 1 5 21

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Conceptual Physical Science

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.0%

13.8

%

6.9%

17.2

%

10.3

%

3.4%

13.8

%

13.8

%

6.9%

13.8

%

0.0%

12.0

%

12.0

%

16.0

%

12.0

%

16.0

%

24.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

8.0%

Q1 Q2

Concept Physical Science A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 4 2 5 3 1 4 4 2 4 29Q2 0 3 3 4 3 4 6 0 0 2 25

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Physics First

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0.0%

5.2%

17.2

%

12.1

%

10.3

%

15.5

% 19.0

%

1.7%

8.6% 10

.3%

0.0% 1.

7%

10.3

%

6.9%

12.1

%

8.6%

8.6%

8.6%

12.1

%

31.0

%

5.3%

10.5

%

5.3%

5.3%

26.3

%

21.1

%

0.0%

5.3%

21.1

%

0.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

Physics First A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 3 10 7 6 9 11 1 5 6 58Q2 0 1 6 4 7 5 5 5 7 18 58M1 1 2 1 1 5 4 0 1 4 0 19

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Physics First CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%

2.8%

10.3

%

10.7

%

9.8%

17.8

%

15.0

%

7.9%

10.7

%

7.5%

7.5%

5.3%

14.4

%

13.4

%

18.7

%

15.3

%

11.5

%

6.7% 7.

2%

4.3%

3.3%

5.7%

16.7

%

5.7%

10.5

%

11.5

%

9.1%

9.1% 9.

6%

11.0

%

11.0

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Physics First CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 6 22 23 21 38 32 17 23 16 16 214Q2 11 30 28 39 32 24 14 15 9 7 209M1 12 35 12 22 24 19 19 20 23 23 209

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Physics First Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

7.8%

23.5

%

17.6

%

11.8

%

17.6

%

11.8

%

7.8%

0.0%

0.0% 2.

0%

2.0%

18.0

%

38.0

%

18.0

%

8.0%

12.0

%

4.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

16.0

%

10.0

%

24.0

%

8.0%

12.0

%

10.0

%

6.0%

4.0%

10.0

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Physics First Honors A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 4 12 9 6 9 6 4 0 0 1 51Q2 1 9 19 9 4 6 2 0 0 0 50M1 0 8 5 12 4 6 5 3 2 5 50

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Physics Lab CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1.6

%

14

.1%

18

.8%

4.7

%

25

.0%

10

.9%

6.3

% 7.8

% 9.4

%

1.6

%

1.6

%

18

.8%

14

.1%

7.8

%

7.8

%

21

.9%

6.3

% 7.8

%

7.8

%

6.3

%

14

.1%

18

.8%

9.4

%

1.6

%

7.8

%

14

.1%

1.6

%

6.3

%

4.7

%

21

.9%

Q1 Q2 M1

Physics Lab CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 9 12 3 16 7 4 5 6 1 64Q2 1 12 9 5 5 14 4 5 5 4 64M1 9 12 6 1 5 9 1 4 3 14 64

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Physics Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

9.3%

24.1

%

14.8

%

16.7

%

18.5

%

7.4%

5.6%

3.7%

0.0%

0.0%

5.6%

14.8

%

13.0

%

13.0

%

13.0

%

13.0

%

9.3%

3.7%

1.9%

13.0

%

5.7%

5.7%

3.8%

1.9%

11.3

%

5.7% 7.

5%

11.3

%

13.2

%

34.0

%

Q1 Q2 M1

Physics H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 5 13 8 9 10 4 3 2 0 0 54Q2 3 8 7 7 7 7 5 2 1 7 54M1 3 3 2 1 6 3 4 6 7 18 53

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP European History

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

0.0%

10.3

%

27.6

%

3.4%

20.7

%

17.2

%

13.8

%

3.4%

3.4%

0.0%

0.0%

10.7

%

17.9

%

17.9

%

7.1%

32.1

%

3.6%

3.6%

3.6%

3.6%

3.6%

25.0

%

10.7

%

10.7

% 14.3

%

14.3

%

3.6%

10.7

%

7.1%

0.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

AP European History A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 3 8 1 6 5 4 1 1 0 29Q2 0 3 5 5 2 9 1 1 1 1 28M1 1 7 3 3 4 4 1 3 2 0 28

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP US History

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

0.0%

0.0%

25.0

%

25.0

%

25.0

%

25.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

12.5

%

25.0

%

37.5

%

0.0%

12.5

%

12.5

%

0.0%

0.0%

12.5

%

25.0

%

25.0

%

12.5

%

12.5

%

0.0%

0.0%

12.5

%

0.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

AP US History A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 8Q2 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 0 8M1 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 8

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13AP World History

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

1.6%

12.9

%

32.3

%

22.6

%

22.6

%

4.8%

1.6%

0.0%

0.0% 1.

6%

0.0%

9.8%

23.0

%

14.8

%

37.7

%

8.2%

1.6%

4.9%

0.0%

0.0%

Q1 Q2

AP World History A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 8 20 14 14 3 1 0 0 1 62Q2 0 6 14 9 23 5 1 3 0 0 61

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Ancient Civilization

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

12.7

%

27.5

%

12.7

%

6.9%

15.7

%

3.9%

2.0%

10.8

%

3.9%

3.9%

13.9

%

17.8

%

13.9

%

9.9%

9.9%

5.9%

5.9%

4.0%

6.9%

11.9

%

9.1%

20.2

%

14.1

%

2.0%

8.1%

16.2

%

0.0%

11.1

%

11.1

%

8.1%

Q1 Q2 M1

Ancient Civilization A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 13 28 13 7 16 4 2 11 4 4 102Q2 14 18 14 10 10 6 6 4 7 12 101M1 9 20 14 2 8 16 0 11 11 8 99

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Human Behavior (Semester)

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

3.8

%

25

.0%

11.5

%

9.6

%

21

.2%

9.6

%

3.8

%

7.7

%

5.8

%

1.9

%

1.9

%

25

.0%

11.5

%

15

.4%

11.5

%

7.7

%

7.7

%

3.8

%

7.7

%

7.7

%

0.0

%

23

.1%

19

.2%

7.7

%

19

.2%

5.8

%

9.6

% 11.5

%

1.9

%

1.9

%

2.5

%

10

.0%

7.5

%

22

.5%

20

.0%

12

.5%

12

.5%

2.5

%

5.0

%

5.0

%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Human Behavior A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 13 6 5 11 5 2 4 3 1 52Q2 1 13 6 8 6 4 4 2 4 4 52F1 0 12 10 4 10 3 5 6 1 1 52X1 1 4 3 9 8 5 5 1 2 2 40

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Law and Justice (Semester)

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

0.0

%

37

.1%

28

.6%

14

.3%

14

.3%

2.9

%

2.9

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

8.6

%

25

.7%

34

.3%

22

.9%

8.6

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%2.9

%

28

.6%

40

.0%

11.4

%

17

.1%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

18

.2%

27

.3%

13

.6%

18

.2%

9.1

%

13

.6%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Law & Justice A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 13 10 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 35Q2 3 9 12 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 35F1 1 10 14 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 35X1 4 6 3 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 22

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Social Decision

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

12.5

%

30.0

%

20.0

%

7.5%

10.0

%

7.5%

0.0%

2.5%

10.0

%

0.0%

27.5

%

37.5

%

7.5%

5.0%

7.5%

0.0%

0.0%

5.0%

5.0%

5.0%

12.5

%

37.5

%

22.5

%

2.5%

7.5%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0

%

2.5%

0.0%

0.0%

31.6

%

5.3%

10.5

%

26.3

%

10.5

%

5.3%

5.3%

5.3%

0.0%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Social Decision Making I A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 5 12 8 3 4 3 0 1 4 0 40Q2 11 15 3 2 3 0 0 2 2 2 40F1 5 15 9 1 3 0 2 4 1 0 40X1 0 6 1 2 5 2 1 1 1 0 19

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13Sociology

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

9.1%

27.3

%

18.2

%

9.1%

13.6

%

4.5%

0.0%

9.1%

4.5%

4.5%

13.6

%

54.5

%

13.6

%

9.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

4.5%

0.0%

4.5%

0.0%

36.4

%

31.8

%

9.1%

9.1%

4.5%

0.0%

4.5%

0.0%

4.5%

0.0%

20.0

%

0.0%

20.0

%

40.0

%

10.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

10.0

%

Q1 Q2 F1 X1

Sociology A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 6 4 2 3 1 0 2 1 1 22Q2 3 12 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 22F1 0 8 7 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 22X1 0 2 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 1 10

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13US History I

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

4.9%

8.2% 9.

8%

14.8

%

27.9

%

6.6%

6.6%

4.9%

13.1

%

3.3%

0.0%

1.8%

3.6%

20.0

%

9.1%

10.9

% 12.7

% 14.5

%

9.1%

18.2

%

0.0%

7.5%

3.8%

1.9%

17.0

%

5.7%

7.5%

18.9

%

18.9

%

18.9

%

Q1 Q2 M1

US History I A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 3 5 6 9 17 4 4 3 8 2 61Q2 0 1 2 11 5 6 7 8 5 10 55M1 0 4 2 1 9 3 4 10 10 10 53

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13US History I CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1.6%

9.4%

14.1

%

19.9

%

19.4

%

18.3

%

8.4%

5.2%

1.6% 2.1%

0.5%

7.3%

11.5

%

9.4%

20.4

%

15.7

%

11.5

% 13.6

%

3.7%

6.3%

1.6%

10.6

%

9.5%

8.5%

11.1

%

18.0

%

6.9%

13.8

%

14.8

%

5.3%

Q1 Q2 M1

US History I CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 3 18 27 38 37 35 16 10 3 4 191Q2 1 14 22 18 39 30 22 26 7 12 191M1 3 20 18 16 21 34 13 26 28 10 189

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13US History I Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

4.0%

18.2

%

27.3

%

19.2

%

8.1%

18.2

%

4.0%

1.0%

0.0%

0.0%

6.2%

15.5

%

26.8

%

4.1%

23.7

%

14.4

%

2.1%

5.2%

1.0%

1.0%2.

0%

11.0

%

16.0

%

10.0

% 12.0

%

21.0

%

5.0%

15.0

%

7.0%

1.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

US History I H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 4 18 27 19 8 18 4 1 0 0 99Q2 6 15 26 4 23 14 2 5 1 1 97M1 2 11 16 10 12 21 5 15 7 1 100

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13US History II CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

75.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

25.0

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

33.3

%

66.7

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

66.7

%

0.0%

33.3

%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

US History II CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 4Q2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3M1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13World History 9

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

8.3%

6.9%

9.7% 11

.1%

19.4

%

18.1

%

8.3%

5.6% 6.

9%

5.6%

7.2%

11.6

%

8.7%

8.7%

21.7

%

11.6

%

4.3%

8.7%

11.6

%

5.8%

5.8%

17.4

%

17.4

%

8.7%

13.0

%

10.1

%

7.2%

7.2%

2.9%

10.1

%

Q1 Q2 M1

World History 9 A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 6 5 7 8 14 13 6 4 5 4 72Q2 5 8 6 6 15 8 3 6 8 4 69M1 4 12 12 6 9 7 5 5 2 7 69

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13World History 9 CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.9

%

14

.6%

14

.6%

18

.9%

25

.0%

11.3

%

6.1

%

3.8

%

3.3

%

1.4

%

0.0

%

8.5

%

12

.3%

13

.7%

22

.3%

14

.7%

13

.3%

6.2

%

4.3

%

4.7

%

1.4

%

8.0

%

10

.8%

9.0

%

15

.1%

14

.2%

11.3

%

12

.7%

12

.7%

4.7

%

Q1 Q2 M1

World History 9 CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 2 31 31 40 53 24 13 8 7 3 212Q2 0 18 26 29 47 31 28 13 9 10 211M1 3 17 23 19 32 30 24 27 27 10 212

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13World History 9 Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

1.4%

16.2

%

20.3

%

32.4

%

21.6

%

6.8%

0.0% 1.

4%

0.0%

0.0%

2.7%

14.9

%

18.9

%

23.0

%

32.4

%

5.4%

1.4%

1.4%

0.0%

0.0%

5.4%

24.3

%

23.0

%

8.1%

21.6

%

8.1%

4.1%

4.1%

1.4%

0.0%

Q1 Q2 M1

World History 9 Honors A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 1 12 15 24 16 5 0 1 0 0 74Q2 2 11 14 17 24 4 1 1 0 0 74M1 4 18 17 6 16 6 3 3 1 0 74

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13World History 11 CP

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

2.0%

19.3

%

17.2

%

15.2

%

20.5

%

9.4%

5.3% 6.

1%

1.2%

3.7%

2.1%

8.9%

19.0

%

16.9

%

16.9

%

7.6% 8.

4% 9.3%

8.0%

3.0%

0.0%

3.8%

8.1%

13.6

%

22.1

%

13.2

%

10.6

%

11.1

%

8.5% 8.9%

Q1 Q2 M1

World History 11 CP A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 5 47 42 37 50 23 13 15 3 9 244Q2 5 21 45 40 40 18 20 22 19 7 237M1 0 9 19 32 52 31 25 26 20 21 235

MOHS Q1, Q2, & Midterm Grade Distributions 2012-13World History 11 Honors

A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

0.0%

22.7

%

20.5

%

27.3

%

20.5

%

2.3% 4.

5%

0.0% 2.

3%

0.0%2.

3%

27.3

%

40.9

%

6.8%

18.2

%

4.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%2.

3%

9.1%

22.7

%

18.2

%

25.0

%

11.4

%

6.8%

2.3%

0.0% 2.

3%

Q1 Q2 M1

World History11 H A+ A A- B+ B B- C+ C C- F TotalQ1 0 10 9 12 9 1 2 0 1 0 44Q2 1 12 18 3 8 2 0 0 0 0 44M1 1 4 10 8 11 5 3 1 0 1 44

168

Tinc Road Key Accomplishments

• Each grade level developed 2 SMART Goals for implementation during the 2011-2012 school year and is currently in the process of benchmarking their progress towards attainment of their goals.

• Sue Dinges conducted a workshop for our faculty in an effort to help teachers better understand how to prepare their students short constructed responses on the NJASK. As a result, lessons and assignments targeted at developing better short constructed responses were implement.

• The web-based Compass Learning Program has been implemented and is supporting our special needs students in their effort to attain scores in the proficient range on the NJASK in grades 3,4 and 5.

• The two new instructional positions, The Early Intervention Teacher and the Academic Achievement Specialist, are now seeing their groups are on a regular basis.

• Staff Development in-service programs were delivered in Singapore Math and Writer’s Workshop.

169

Tinc Road Key Learnings• In Kindergarten, the adoption of a SMART GOAL in reading impacted student

achievement by signaling to the teachers the need to allocate more time in guided reading groups. By allocating more time, the teachers began giving more individualized attention to students in addressing reading deficiencies.

• In First Grade, students appear to be grasping new skills at a quicker pace as their understanding of number concepts grows. In reading, the Guided Reading Program continues to be highly effective. The current amount of level H readers indicates that the use of leveled Guided Reading groups and the extra support of professional resources serve as effective strategies and tools to benefit student learning and achievement.

• In Second Grade , the pursuit of their reading SMART goal helped increase the achievement in reading as evidenced on the SRI test. Second grade reduced the number of students scoring in the BR-0 ranged form 50% to 16%. An additional 30 minutes of reading instruction daily form the Early Intervention Teacher, take home books for ELL students, inferential reading instruction through guided reading and shared reading, reading games, the use of RAZ computer program and Compass Learning are all leading to increased student achievement.

170

Tinc Road Key Learnings

• In Third Grade, through the development of a reading SMART Goal, student SRI scores demonstrated that the rate of improvement was on par with goal attainment. SRI growth is demonstrated by a large moving from the partial proficient range into the proficient range.

• Also in Third Grade, moving math to the first instructional block has improved students’ ability to focus and attend to tasks. One block per week is being using for remediation and one block per week is being dedicated to answering questions required a short constructed response.

• In Fourth Grade, general education students surpassed their SMART goal of 44% of the students scoring in the Advanced Proficient range on the SRI to 47%. An increased emphasis on small group instruction has been helpful.

• In Fifth Grade, signs of improvement have become evident in student’s work product such as beginning to master short constructed response and using text support for responses. Teachers created specific questions and lessons to strengthen students’ ability to respond to short constructed responses. Teacher modeling has helped students understand the expectations. Sharing examples of exemplary students’ work has also helped model fifth grade expectations.

CMS Key Learnings Each grade level has proven when we evaluate our students for their

strengths and weaknesses and make a plan with a goal real progress can be seen. Even the year long goals show that they are definitely on track to make or exceed their set goal in the two areas.

171

172

Sandshore Key Accomplishments

• All Special Ed., BSI, Early Intervention and Achievement students are on compass

learning; initial assessments are completed and students are on individualized

learning paths

• First grade students received weekly SCR practice with explicit instruction

• One SCR benchmark is administered in 1st grade per month

• First grade introduced an acronym for students to reference for SCR expectations:

WRAP (we, recycle (words from the question), answer (the question), prove (give

supporting details)

• SCR rubric RACE developed and adjusted by 2nd grade staff

• Grades 3-5 have adopted “APPS” program developed by achievement specialist for

SCRs.

173

SS Key Accomplishments• Direct instruction on reading comprehension strands during coverage periods

• Consistent reading skills taught across grade levels utilizing common vocabulary

supported by BSI and AS

• SRI awards ceremony focused on outstanding growth and advanced placement

• Math fact race in 2nd grade was designed and implemented; students surpassed

expectations

• 4th and 5th grade G&T students created projects through Renzulli Learning Systems

Mountain View Key Accomplishments

• 296 students in 3rd, 4th and 5th grades continued the process to set, monitor progress, reassess and re-set 9,768 SMART Goals (33 Weeks) for Minute Math performance improvement.

• 296 students in 3rd 4th and 5th grades wrote to a common prompt to establish a baseline performance measurement in February; 80 students in 2nd grade wrote to a grade-wide prompt. See Following Chart.

• Recognition of students in 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th grades in Grade-Level Assemblies for outstanding performance on SRI and Minute Math in Q2. Recognized 1st Grade in classrooms. See Following Charts.

• School-wide Recognition of Weekly Math Club achievement through Announcements, posting in Hallways and Monthly Math Club displays.

• School-wide Recognition of SRI Achievement through posting in Hallways .

• School-wide Recognition of Link-it through posting in Hallways.• Introduced Dolch Word Wall Activities to First Grade.

Documents

Six Year Plan Second Quarter 2012-13. Second Quarter Report 2012 In the fall of 2009, the Mount Olive Township Public Schools adopted a six year plan