Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
POOR LEGIBILITY
ONE OR MORE PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE DIFFICULT TO READ DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL
- ^ , __icV i-H^-A fept -'- . ••.,
^
SFUND RECORDS CTR
0217-00042
SFUND RECORDS CTR
88004710
•I
International Specialists in the Environmental Sciences
„ mi=t-
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation 101 S. Litchfield Road
Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340
TDD #R-09-8307-030
September, 1983
Submitted to: Robert M. Mandel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Toxic and Waste Management - Region IX San Francisco, California Division
tf ecology and environment, inc. 120 HOWARD STREET, SUITE #640, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105, TEL. 415-777-2811
international Specialists In the Environmental Sciences
recycled paper 11 i 0 2 0 0 5 7
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 SITE BACKGROUND/DESCRIPTION , 2-1
3.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT , 3-1
3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Solvents 3-1
3.2.1 Solvents Used 3-1
3.2.2 Solvent Disposal 3-5
3.3 Chrome Sludge and Acids 3-10
3.3.1 Chrome Sludge 3-10
3.3.2 Acids 3-12
4.0 SEWERS AND DRAINS ' 4-1
4.1 Introduction ' • 4-1 4.2 Outfall 001 4-1 4.3 Outfall 002 4-4 4.4 Outfall 003 4-4
5.0 DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING AREA/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS 5-1
5.1 Background 5-1 5.2 Well Information 5-2
6.0 SUMMARY 6-1
7.0 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS 7-1
7.1 Additional Sampling 7-1 7.2 Industry Research 7-1 7.3 Interviews With Past and Current Employees 7-2
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
Tables Page
2.1 ON-SITE BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES 2-4
3.1 CHLORINATED SOLVENTS PURCHASING RECORDS 3-3
3.2 DEGREASER HISTORY 3-4
3.3 SUMMARY OF TSD QUARTERLY REPORTS FROM 3007 LETTER RESPONSE .... 3-6
3.4 PAST ON-SITE DISPOSAL SITES 3-8
5.1 GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION ON-SITE WELL CHARACTERISTICS ... 5-3
5.2 TCE TEST RESULTS - GOODYEAR AEROSPACE WELLS 5-4
Figures
2 .1 GOODYEAR AEROSPACE PLOT PLAN 2-2
4 . 1 SCHEMATIC OF WATER FLOW THROUGH PLANT 4-2
4 .2 SCHEMATIC OF GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION AND PHOENIX LITCHFIELD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 4-6
P la tes
1 GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS End of Report
2 GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION AND SURROUNDING AREA ...• End of Report
Appendices
A SUMMARY MATRIX OF CONTACT REPORTS
B GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION §3007 LETTER RESPONSE
C CHROME SLUDGE DRYING BEDS INFORMATION
D GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION 1981 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION
E . OUTFALL 001 ANALYSIS
F SUMMARY OF INORGANIC ANALYSES ON ON-SITE WELLS FROM FIT SAMPLING IN SEPTEMBER 1982
1 "11
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, Arizona Division, located in Goodyear,
Arizona is within the Litchfield Airport Study Area which is on the EPA's
National Priorities List (NPL) of hazardous waste sites. According to
records compiled by the FIT, groundwater contamination by 1,1,2 trichloro
ethylene (TCE) was first discovered in the Litchfield Airport Study Area in
1981 in samples collected by the Arizona Department of Health Services.
A preliminary investigation of the Litchfield Airport Study Area was
conducted by the FIT in June 1982. As part of this investigation, the EPA
in July 1982 requested historical and present information on waste genera
tion and disposal practices from a variety of parties in the Litchfield
Airport Study Area pursuant to §3007(a) of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) and §104(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).. A copy of the Letter sent to the
Arizona Divison of Goodyear Aerospace Corporation is included in Appendix A.
The Goodyear Aerospace Corporation response to EPA's §3007 information
letter request was received by the EPA on September 2, 1982. A copy of
their response is included in Appendix B and the corresponding appendices
are on file at the EPA.
In September 1982, sampling of the wells in the study area by the FIT
substantiated localized TCE contamination. In January 1983, the Litchfield
Airport Study Area Remedial Investigation Workolan was produced by the FIT
to provide information on the problem definition.
The EPA requested the FIT to conduct an additional investigation of the
Goodyear Aerospace facility in July 1983 as a follow-up to their §3007
letter response. The site inspection was conducted on August 18, 1983 with
emphasis on:
1. Identification of historic and current hazardous waste generation, storage, treatment and disposal practices at the facility;
2. Locations of all monitoring, supply and injection wells;
3. Location of surface and subsurface drainage pathways (drains/ ditches/sanitary sewers, industrial outfalls, etc.).
1-1
In addition, a comprehensive facility tour with a company representative was
conducted.
In gathering background data on Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, FIT
personnel assembled all existing information available from the Arizona
Department of Health Services and the EPA. FIT personnel met with Goodyear
Aerospace Corporation representatives fo.r the site inspection. A complete
list of individuals and organizations contacted are as follows:
Ms. Sandra Eberhardt Bureau of Water Quality Control Arizona Department of Health Services
Mr. Tom Heim Goodyear Aerospace Corporation Arizona Division
Mr. Randy Clark Goodyear Aerospace Corporation • Arizona Division
Information obtained from above sources was used to prepare the Site
Background and Description presented in Section 2.
There have been two reports already written on the Litchfield Airport
Study Area:
1. Litchfield Airport Study Area, Remedial Investigation Work-plan, January 1983 by Ecology and Environment, Inc. (the FIT). This report summarizes sampling results and §3007 RCRA/CERCLA responses from area industries.
2. Phoenix-Litchfield Airport Area, Remedial Action Master Plan. Draft, July 1983 by CH2M Hill. This report presents a scope of work for remedial investigation activities and feasibility studies needed to identify and schedule remedial actions.
This report will emphasize information that pertains to the Goodyear
Aerospace Corporation site in the Litchfield Airport Study Area. Background
information on the area's geology, hydrogeology, and overall groundwater
conditions can be found in the above mentioned reports. Data on the on-site
wells at Goodyear Aerospace Corporation is summarized in this report in
Section 5.1. Since the EPA had requested information on surface and
subsurface drainage pathways at the facility a separate section, Section
4.0 titled, "Drains and Sewers" was written.
1-2
2.0 SITE BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, Arizona Division, is located on a 107
acre site in the Litchfield Industrial Park in Goodyear, Arizona. It is
owned and operated by Goodyear Aerospace Corporation with headquarters in
Akron, Ohio. Construction of the facilities at this location was started in
the summer of 1941. The United States Government owned the site when the
facility opened in January 1942 and Goodyear Aircraft Corporation (currently
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation) merely operated the plant. The plant closed
down in 1946 and was then owned by the U.S. War Assets Administration until
1949. In 1949, Goodyear Aircraft Corporation purchased the facility and it
has been in operation ever since. Currently the plant operates on one shift
and 1,500 employees, however, during World War II with the plant operating
at peak capacity, there were 3 shifts and as many as 8,000 employees
(according to Tom Heim).
The plant is located adjacent to what is currently the Phoenix-
Litchfield Municipal Airport. From 1945 to 1948 this airport was owned and
operated by the Department of the Navy. A plot plan of the Goodyear
Aerospace Company facility is presented in Figure 2.1. Explanation of the
major structures in the plan are listed in Table 2.1.
The plant is involved in the development and manufacture of aerospace
related products. Currently, major operations at the Goodyear Aerospace
facility include:
1. Electronics equipment manufacture, chiefly radar
2. Transparent products manufacture, chiefly aircraft and automobile windshields and windows and
3. Structural manufacturing, chiefly MX missile transporter, and bonded aluminum-skinned shelters
Past operations of Goodyear Aerospace primarily included manufacturing and
installing parts f o r the military. Navy planes from the airport were
brought into the hangers at the plant for part installation and machining.
2-1
/~^^
OUTFALL 0 0 3 <
LITCHriELD I l_ MUUCIPM. OUTFALL 001
@ SLUDGE DRYING BED
® i^ •^ - ^ >—A- - ^ -
SLUDGE DRYINGf " '
I * I I I I I I
<^^)_—I271 ' l .= ' : ^ . OUTFALL ' ^ ' " ~ ~ ^ ^ ~
002 r @ \ J..._.® i_._._|
n V---1A
© I
@ ©
\ @
— ^ - ^
@
@
JL @ (§)
L I T C U F I I L O ^ O A O
® •iir
FIGURE 2.1
GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION PLOT PLAN
Overall, much of the work at Goodyear Aerospace was and still is con
tractual in nature, i.e., sizes and durations of projects are continuously
changing. 'The buildings which house the manufacturing portions of the plant
are designed with large open areas to allow for easy erecting and dis
mantling of project operations. Contract lengths can vary from as short as
a few weeks to as long as several years. A substantial portion of the work
at the facility is and has been research, development and production of very
small, quantities of a particular product.
The operations at Goodyear Aerospace Corporation which generate
hazardous waste are primarily metal treatment processes such as plating,
degreasing and etching. Due to the contract nature of the company the
locations and operating capacities of these processes change. There has
been a chromate treatment plant in one location at the facility since the
mid-1970's for rinse water treatment in Goodyear Aerospace Corporation
Building #1 (Item 2, Figure 2.1). At the time of the visit there was one
large degreaser and several smaller degreasers being used at the facility.
At the time of the plant's maximum operating capacity during World War II,
there were up to five large degreasers in use at the facility (refer to
Section 3.2.1).
The facility uses solvents and acids and generates metal sludges, waste
solvents and waste acids from the metal treatment operations. Historically,
much of these wastes were disposed on-site in sludge drying beds (see
Section 3.3). Trichloroethylene has been used at the site prior to 1974,
but no records are available indicating substantial on-site disposal (see
Section 3.2.1, Solvent Use).
2-3
•
TABLE 2.1
ON-SITE BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES
ITEM EXPLANATION
1
2,3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13-18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Once used for stripping planes. Used to be assembly, now used for machining.
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation (GAC) buildings #1 and #2. Parts manufacturing. Currently mostly offices.
GAC #26. Assembly of B-24's and retrofitting during WW II. Used as a blimp hanger. Post WW II - used as a blimp hanger. Currently mostly offices.
GAC #16. Warehouse, painting and carpentry.
GAC #76. Built in-l-9.7J/.- Used to be manufacturing but now used for storage and blimp parts manufacturing.
GAC #70. Shipping and receiving.
Vicg-ij3__cJmmicji.Us-tor-age. ? c ^ W f IMUTX^^^''-^ - O V C S ^ - O - ^
W-#s-te-storage areaT Materials stored msotly in 55 gallon drums.
L . 0-s. Used for offices,
Classrooms and labs.
GAC #50 was constructed here in U
Labs and offices.
Offices
Employees parking lot.
Location of two smaller old chrome sludge drying beds.
Location of larger old chrome sludge drying bed.
Drummed waste storage.
Wastewater plant sludge drying bed.
Powerhouse of__th.e-P-l.an.t—(-bo-i-1 ers, furnaces, etc.).
1,1,1-trichloroethane 6,000 gallon above ground storage tank.
% ^ ^ s i J k \ j ^ d j ^ - 'C r - ' ^ - ^^ j t ~ ^ - T \ ^ . € J r i ^ . (^ f -< i^£ . - >f •?> "^ > ji
5 2-4
;
3.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT
3.1 Introduction
Currently, all wastes are transported from the plant for off-site
disposal. Prior to October 1980, treated wastes from anodizing, metal
etching, plating and plastics polishing and some solvents were disposed on-
site in a large drying bed and two small drying beds at the south end of the
the facility. Off-site disposal practices of chlorinated solvents are not
well documented prior to 1974. Durinq the site inspection, it was difficult
to obtain additional information regarding TCE disposal because of the lack
of disposal records and the lack of recollection of what happened to the TCE
by Tom Heim and Randy Clark.
3.2 Solvents
3.2.1 Solvents Used
Trichloroethylene was used extensively as a degreaser solvent at the
facility prior to 1974 at which time its use was discontinued and use of
1,1,1-trichloroethane began. According to Tom Heim, £.ens"oTrn"e-l—Direet&r— at
tlre Good-y.ear P 'tTi't, the switchover from using TCE to 1,1,1-trichloroethane
was, on a volume basis, approximately one to one. From the 3007 Letter
Response, it is believed that TCE and the other solvents listed in Table 3.1
are the only chlorinated solvents that have been used in significant
quantities at the facility. It is likely that small quantities of other
solvents have been used in laboratories and have been present as a solvent
in purchased cements and other products, but there is no record of such use
and the quantities (3007 Letter Response). TCE was mostly bought in 55
gallon drums and stored near the buildings where it was used (see Contact
Report, Tom Heim, September 20, 1983, Appendix A ) . There are no records or
indications that there was a large tank for storage of TCE at the facility.
3-1
The use of trichloroethane began in 1974 as a substitute degreaser
solvent for TCE. Small quantities are also used for hand cleaning of parts
and as a solvent for cements. Trichloroethane is stored in a 6,000 gallon
above ground tank which is located outside one of the parts manufacturing
buildings (Item 25, Figure 2.1). It was learned during the site inspection
that this tank is filled about once per year. Their 3007 Letter Response
explains that the amounts of trichloroethane shown in Table 3.1 are based on
purchases only and that the actual use of the, material during a particular
year may be different from the amount shown due to inventory changes in the
amount remaining in storage. The current supplier of trichloroethane to
Goodyear Aerospace is Van Waters and Rogers of Phoenix. Over the years
however the plant may have used other suppliers but there are no records.
In the 3007 Letter Response by Goodyear Aerospace a history of the
major degreasers used by the facility was presented (see Table 3.2) in order
to provide a better idea of the quantities of waste chlorinated solvents
which were generated by the facility during the years in which there are no
records. We were shown a large degreaser with a still, freeboard and cover
during the plant tour. This degreaser was located in Goodyear Aerospace
Building #1 and was installed in 1974. The solvent capacity of this
particular degreaser was 1,900 gallons and the dimensions with freeboard
were about 40' long x 10' wide x 10' deep. We were informed that at peak
operation of the plant there could have been 4 or 5 of these large de
greasers in use at the plant. Due to the nature of Goodyear Aerospace's
contracts with projects varying in size and duration, degreasers were
frequently moved about within the buildings.
There are four points with regard to the degreasers used at Goodyear
Aerospace in Table 3.2 which are mentioned in the 3007 Letter Response.
First of all, there are no operating records for the degreasers. The
quantities of materials cleaned in a given time vary considerably and the
equipment may have been shut down for lengthy periods. Second, the presence
of a freeboard chiller on a degreaser reduces solvent loss and a degreaser
using one would use substantially less new solvent per unit of dirty solvent
generated. Third, a degreaser with a still recycles dirty solvent thus
3-2
TABLE 3.1
CHLORINATED SOLVENTS PURCHASING RECORDS
1 1 ,
Year
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
6 A L
.
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
55
250
580
1,170
5,825
12,730
5,721
1,320
5,440
L O N S P U R C H A S E D
Methylene Chloride
330
420
0
9
9
55
55
55
110
110
1,1,2 Trichloroethane 2,1,1 Trifluoroethane
770
1,545
1,405
880
1,965
Taken from: Goodyear Aerospace Corporation 3007 Letter Response, August 12, 1982
3-3
TABLE 3.2
DEGREASER HISTORY
oo
Degreassr
D-560 #25-4587
D-541 #25-4608
D-800 Bondolite
#25-2117
0-574 #25-4625
#25-4175
Install
7-76
5-77
6-73
4-51
9-77
12-67
Date Removed
—
—
—
1973
—
1974
Solvent Used
Freon TE
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Freon TE & TF
Trichloroethylene
Still?
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Free-Board Chiller?
- Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Estimated Current Solvent Used
Gal/Year
1200
800
4800
—
200
—
Estimated Current Waste
Generated Gal/Year
150
400
200
—
50
—
Approximate Size L x W
10' X 16"
6' X 3'
27' X 6'
20' X 4'
5' X 2'
30' X 4'
Taken from: Goodyear Aerospace Corporation 3007 Letter Response, August 12, 1982
reducing the amount of waste solvent generated from the degreaser. Finally,
the fourth point is that solvent loss is different for different solvents
which would be reflected in the amount of solvent purchased per gallon of
waste generated.
The use of Freon TE and TF as a degreaser solvent began at Goodyear
Aerospace in late 1976 and in September 1977. According to the 3007 Letter
Response, the figures in Table 3.1 should adequately represent the total
history of trichloro-trifloroethane use at the facility. The freon de
greasers were never associated with the trichloroethylene degreasers since
they were brought into operation for specific contracts at the plant.
Other solvents used at Goodyear Aerospace included acetone, isopropyl
alcohol, methylene chloride and toluene. Methylene chloride is used for
hand cleaning of materials. The annual purchases of methylene chloride
since 1972 are listed in Table 3.1.
3.2.2 Solvent Disposal
Currently, all waste solvents are drummed and shipped off-site for re
cycling. A summary of the TSD Quarterly Reports submitted with the 3007
Letter Response is in Table 3.3. The annual volume of waste flammable
solvents generated in 1981 was approximately 2,660 gallons (specific gravity
of toluene = 0.867). The annual volume of waste halogenated solvents
generated in 1981 was approximately 840 gallons (specific gravity of
trichloroethane = 1.31). Goodyear Aerospace Corporation uses various waste
transporters and they are listed in Table 3.4 and in the TSD Quarterly
Reports submitted with their 3007 Letter Response.
The information provided in the 3007 Letter Response on off-site dis
posal of wastes consists of a table (see Table 3.4) of all recorded trans
actions before 1981. Transactions which took place after 1981 are sum
marized in copies of the quarterly reports which were included in the 3007
Letter Response (see Appendix B). The flammable solvents listed in the
3-5
TABLE 3.3
SUMMARY OF TSD QUARTERLY REPORTS FROM 3007 LETTER RESPONSE
Year
1981
TOTALS
1982
Quarter
1
2
3
4
1
2
1 i ,
Chromium Sludge (pounds)
74,000
40,000,
43,000
120,000
277,000
40,000
16,200
Flammable Solvents (pounds)
8,400
7,600
8,000
6,400
30,400
10,400
9,200
Halogenated Solvents (pounds)
3,000
2,400
2,500
2,900
10,800
400
9,000
3-6
quarterly reports come primarily from cleaning parts and molds in trans
parencies manufacture and from paint booths. The solvents consist of ap
proximately 50% toluene and 25% acetone with the remainder being a varying
mixture of alcohols, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl methacrylate, methylene
chloride, naptha and lacquer thinner. Quantities from these sources vary
but is estimated to be 2,000-6,000 gallons per year.
The trichloroethylene shipped to Southwest Solvents (see Table 3.4) in
July 1980 had been in storage at the facility for more than 6 years. This
was probably the material which was removed from the degreasers in 1974 when
the use of trichloroethylene was discontinued. In their 3007 Letter
Response, Goodyear Aerospace states that there may have been earlier ship
ments of waste chlorinated solvents to reclaimers. These waste solvents,
however, were transported from the site by the reclaimer with no-charge to
either party. Therefore, according to Goodyear Aerospace, it is likely that
invoices or purchase orders for such shipments would not have been issued
and no record of the shipment would exist. During the site inspection,
additional information on off-site disposal of TCE was not available.
From the 3007 Letter Response, solvents were disposed in 1971 in one of
the drying beds located on-site. These beds are lined with rubber-coated
fabric and the amount of solvent disposed in this manner are not known.
These solvents consisted mainly of methyl ethyl ketone and toluene. In
addition, about 5% of the solvents generated at the time would have been
alcohol, acetone, and naptha. These solvents also contained neoprene, epoxy
and urethane. According to the 3007 Letter Response submitted by Goodyear
Aerospace, there was a possibility that small quantities of trichloro
ethylene were added to the drying beds and at the same time in the response
it was stated that this "is not considered likely".
In essence, virtually nothing is known regarding solvent disposal at
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation during the first 25 years of its operation.
Since their 3007 Letter Response indicates that solvent reclaimers were used
to dispose of their solvents and no invoices or purchase orders were made.
3-7
TABLE 3.4
PAST OFF-SITE DISPOSAL SITES
(1980 & Before)
FACILITY
Phoenix Fire Department 28th St. & Buckeye Road
1 Phoenix, Arizona
Air Force Gunnery Range Gila Bend, Arizona
Salt River Landfill Project Maricopa Indian Community 40005 S. McDowell Road Scotsdale, Arizona
DATE
10/23/69
06/00/71 12/00/71
09/23/69 06/17/70 06/24/70 12/21/70 12/22/70 07/13/71 07/14/71 11/22/71 07/10/72
07/11/72
04/11/73
04/13/73 04/20/73 01/29/74 01/30/74 01/31/74 04/04/74 08/08/74 10/18/74 11/22/74 12/13/74 04/09/75 06/26/75 07/08/76 12/14/78 01/03/79 02/06/79
NO. OF 55 GAL. DRUMS
91
295 108
150 160 165 207 205 138 145 295 150
116
240
150 160 144 312 154 156 156 154 156 27 156 54 28 200 144 170
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Flammable Solvents
Waste Solvent Waste Solvent
Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Partially Full Drum Waste Partially Full Drum Waste Partially Full Drum Waste Waste Epoxy-Cement
TRANSPORTER
Valdez Transfer & Storage 1310 N. 22nd Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85009
H & R Transfer Address Unknown
Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer H & R Transfer H & R Transfer H & R Transfer H & R Transfer
H & R Transfer
H & R Transfer
H & R Transfer II
II
11
II
il
II
Not Known H & R Transfer GACA H & R Transfer GACA GACA Valdez Transfer
II
li
3-8
PAST OFF-SITE DISPOSAL SITES - Cont'd
FACILITY
Kaibab Industries 2600 South 20th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85009
(Reclaimed)
Southwest Solvents 6760 West Allison Road Chandler, Arizona
(Reclaimed)
Simi Valley Landfill Ventura Regional Company Sanitation District P.O. Box AB Ventura, CA 93002 EPA #CAD990658395
BKK Landfill 2210 S. Azusa West Covina, CA 91791 EPA #CAD067786749
DATE
07/17/80
08/05/80
11/03/80
11/24/80
10/00/80 11/00/80 '12/00/80
NO. OF 55 GAL. DRUMS
20
23
21 tons
1000 gal.
79.2 tons 262.2 tons 20.6 tons
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Waste Oil
Chlorinated Solvent (Trichloroethylene)
Dirt & Heavy Metals
Mixed Waste Solvents Dirt & Heavy Metals
ti
TRANSPORTER
Kaibab Industries
i ,
Southwest Solvents
Overley's, Inc. 650 W. Southern Mesa, AZ 85202
Overley's, Inc. li
li
li
II
Taken from: Goodyear Aerospace Corporation 3007 Letter Response, August 1982
3-9
issues which should be addressed regarding solvent reclaimers are: the
actual existence of solvent reclaimers in the 1940's, 50's and 60's, the
size of the market for reclaimed solvents during this time and the ease of
shipping and locating customers for recycled waste materials.
3.3 Chrome Sludge and Acids
3.3.1 Chrome Sludge
According to the 3007 Letter Response, treated wastes from anodizing,
metal etching, plating and plastics polishing were disposed on-site prior to
1980. in a large drying bed and two small drying beds at the south end of the
plant. These drying beds are items 20 and 21 in Figure 2.1, the Plot Plan.
The drying beds were lined with rubber-coated fabric. A substance was
sprayed on the ground to form the lining of the beds.
The sludge drying bed nearest the airport was used for a short period
of time only. The bed started being used in the early 1970's and use of the
bed stopped in 1980. The other two beds (east of the larger bed) were used
for a longer period of time than the above mentioned bed. The year in which
these beds began operation is not documented; however, according to the 3007
Letter Response, prior to 1980 the sludge beds were the only known disposal
sites for the disposal of waste sludges. The use of the two smaller beds
ceased before 1976. It was in these smaller beds that waste solvents were
occasionally deposited for subsequent evaporation.
The sludge drying beds were used primarily for the chrome sludge from
the chromate treatment plant. The chromate treatment plant was installed in
the mid-1970's to treat process rinsewaters before discharging them into the
sewer. Sludge »containing chromium which has already been reduced from
trivalerrcto he^valent chromium in the rinsewater treatment is generated in
this chromate treatment plant. Sludge is also generated when process tanks
which contain higher concentrations of chromium (as sodium dichromate) are
3-10
cleaned. This waste is stored in. a tank adjacent to the chromate treatment
sludge tank. It was thein m issh treated and disposed on-site in the sludge
drying beds (see Contact Report, Tom Heim, September 14, 1983, in Appendix
1). Any waste not treated at the chromate treatment plant was bench treated
with sodium bisulfite to reduce hexavelent chromium to trivalent chromium
prior to being deposited in a drying bed.
All of the material from the three beds were removed and sent off-site
for disposal in 1980. According to Randy Clark, Environmental Coordinator
at Goodyear Aerospace, there was a problem with one pit when it was being
cleaned out in 1980. The surface of the bed was heavily crusted but just
below the surface the contents of the bed were still gelled and therefore
not successfully dried.
The following is an estimation of the quantities of material disposed
in the drying beds over the course of their operation:
Chromium (Trivalent) 24,341 lb.
Chromium (Hexavalent) 144 lb.
Cadmium 54 lb.
Nickel 132 lb.
Zinc 202 lb.
Copper 428 lb.
Lead 463 lb.
Non-hazardous chemical salts (primarily sodium sulfate) 442,361 lb.
Ground glass & plastic polishing compound 61,250 lb.
TOTAL 529,375 lb.
The bed contents were removed in October and November of 1980, along with
about 275,000 pounds of rubberized fabric and soil. The fabric was used as
the bed liner. The above amounts were taken from 3007 Letter Response and
are based on an analysis of the drying beds and knowledge of the processes
producing the waste. It is important to note here that an organic analysis
of this material was not performed. These drying beds are the only known
disposal sites for wastes of this type prior to October 1980.
3-11
The sizes of these beds could not be determined from the site visit.
Tom Heim and Randy Clark were not certain of the bed dimensions and they
could not be easily determined from walking in and around the area where
they had once existed. There was a noticeable depression in the ground up
to two feet deep where the beds were once located. Randy Clark later sent
additional information which was requested during the visit regarding the
dimensions and sample analyses of the drying beds (see Appendix C ) . From
the information in Appendix C, the dimensions of the two small drying beds
were 20' x 100' x 3' deep and the one larger drying bed was 75' x 100' x 3'
deep.
Currently, all sludges are transported off-site for disposal. Volumes
of sludges shipped off-site by Goodyear Aerospace Corporation since 1980 are
summarized in their quarterly reports which were, included in their 3007
Letter Response (see Appendix B ) . The annual volume of chromium sludge
generated in 1981 was 139 tons. This waste is currently being disposed at
the BKK Landfill in West Covina in California.
There is a sludge drying bed at the wastewater treatment plant. This
plant treats only the on-site domestic sewage generated at the facility.
This sludge drying bed is approximately 75 feet x 40 feet in area. Sewage
wastes were never disposed off-site. Intermittently sludge is deposited on
the drying bed from the sewage plant and to date the bed has not required
any sludge removal.
3.3.2 Acids
The acids used at the facility include sulfuric, hydrochloric, chromic,
nitric, acetic and hydrofluoric acids in their electroplating and metal
finishing processes. Virgin chemicals are stored in 55 gallon drums and
smaller containers in the chemical storage area. Waste acids are currently
transported off-site for disposal and are incorporated in the chrome sludge.
Prior to 1981, spent acids were included with the chrome sludge and disposed
in the drying beds located south of the plant.
3-12
4.0 SEWERS AND DRAINS
4.1 Introduction
Effluent from the Goodyear Aerospace Corporation facility is discharged
via three outfalls: 001, 002 and 003. The facility possesses a valid NPDES
permit for these discharges into nearby sewers and drainage ditches which
eventually drain into the Agua Fria River. Figure 4.1 (taken from the
plant's 1981 NPDES Permit Application, Appendix D) is a schematic of the
water flow through the plant. The plant uses approximately 550,000 gallons
per day total of well water to meet its water needs. The total discharge
from.the plant according to the flow schematic is 363,500 gallons per day.
Locations of these outfalls and sewer lines at the plant were taken from
Plate 1 and are pr^esented in both Figure 2,1 and Figure 4,2. Figure 2.1
shows the relationship between the facility drains and the wells and the
drying beds. It also shows where the drains and sewers eventually discharge
in the airport. The entire area was once a Navy military operation, there
fore the sewer system incorporated what is now the Goodyear plant and the
Phoenix-Litchfield Municipal Airport, Effluent characteristics of these
three outfalls are in the plant's 1981 NPDES permit application which is in
Appendix D,
4,2 Outfall 001
According to the NPDES permit, discharge from outfall 001 contains non-Q r/V' -
process cooling water, building cooling and humidity control water, rain
water and boiler blowdown. Total flow from this outfall is approximately
70,000 gallons per day.
At the point of the 001 outfall the discharge is into an inground pipe
located behind the plant along the Litchfield Airport-Goodyear Aerospace
boundary. Upstream from the plant this drain is an open ditch. From
Goodyear Aerospace this drain crosses through Litchfield Airport beneath the
ground where drains and sewer lines from airport buildings hook into it.
This drain then leads into the main drain at the airport which is an open
lined ditch and parallel to the airport runway (see Figure 4.2).
4-1
WELL
550,000 GPD
T R L ^ h MENT
398,500 GPO
3,000 GPD
19,000 GPD
"BUILDING COOLING AND HUMIDITY CONTROL
-pi I ^o
170,000 GPD 13,000 GPD
EVAPORATION
ik METAL TREATING AND
FINISHING
94,000 GPD
YARDS
5,000 GPD
NON-CONTACT PROCESS
COOLING WATER
6,000 GPD
196,000 GPD
RAIN
CHROME TREATMENT PLANT
WATER 6,000 GPD
SAMPLE P'O I NT "CTP" 30,000 GPD
32,500 GPD SAMPLE POINT "002" 263,000 GPD
28,000 GPD .4.500 GPD POWER HOUSE BOILERS
EVAPORATION
500 GPD
35,000 GPD
RAIN WATER 2,000 GPD
SAMPLE POINT 'TOl" 70,000 GPD
"SANT
30,500 GPD
TARY WATER
CLARI GESTER
SAMPLE POINT 003
CHLORINATION
30,500 GPD
Taken from: Goodyear Aerospace 1981 NPDES Permit Application FIGURE 4.1
SCHEMATIC OF WATER FLOW THROUGH PLANT
There was once a second discharge outfall for a portion of the effluent
which now discharges from the plant via the 001 outfall. This second out
fall was located near the southern driveway that joins the airport and the
Goodyear Aerospace facility (see Figures 2.1 and 4.2). Effluent from this
outfall came from Goodyear Aerospace Corporation Building #76 and runoff
from nearby ramps. According to Tom Heim (see Contact Report, September 14,
1983, Appendix 1), this outfall was probably sealed off soon after the plant
started up in 1949. He believes that it was sealed off and effluent was
discharged from one instead of two outfalls because it was easier for
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation to monitor a combined effluent.
.According to Tom Heim's recollection, the point of discharge from out
let 001 was always into an inground drain. Aerial photographs from February
1949 show that the drain that goes through the airport was once an open
ditch. It is difficult to determine in this same photograph whether or not
the drain at the point of Goodyear Aerospace's discharge from outlet 001 was
an open ditch in the past.
Two samples were taken of the effluent from outfall 001 by Goodyear
Aerospace Corporation for their 1981 NPDES Permit Application, The analysis
of the first sample showed that the discharge contained 169 ppb (parts per
billion) 1,1,1-trichloroethane and 47 ppb trichloroethylene. The laboratory
results of this sample are in the 1981 NPDES Permit Application which is in
Appendix D. Due to the high trichloroethane and trichloroethylene concen
trations found in the first sample, a second sample was then taken and
tested in the event that there was lab error with the first sample anaylsis.
The laboratory results of the second sample (Appendix E) showed a trichloro
ethane concentration of 8 ppb. No analysis of the sample for trichloro
ethylene was performed. According to Randy Clark, he was more concerned
about the high trichloroethane concentration in the first sample from out
fall 001 than the concentration of TCE since the facility no longer used TCE
in any on-site operation. The lab results from the second sample were then
later submitted as the effluent characteristics for discharge from outlet
001. It is important to note that the lab results for the second sample in
4-3
Appendix E have a misprint for the project title. The correct title is,
"1,1,1 Trichloroethane Analysis" (see Contact Report, Randy Clark, September
14, 1983, Appendix A ) ,
4.3 Outfall 002
Discharge from outfall 002 contains non-contact process cooling water,
building cooling and humidity control water, rainwater and metal treating
rinse water. Total flow from this outfall is approximately 263,000 gallons
per day.
Discharges from the 002 outfall enter a lined open ditch located on
Goodyear Aerospace property that begins just south of the main area of the
plant (see Figures 2,1 and 4.2), When the drain reaches Airport Road it
goes beneath ground and turns west into Litchfield Municipal Airport, The
drain remains beneath ground until it reaches the main Litchfield Municipal
Airport open drain which runs parallel to the airport runway. No known
changes have been made to this drainage ditch since the plant has been in
operation.
The Arizona Department of Health Services sampled the liquid in this
drain at Airport Road on three different days: May 18, 1983; May 25, 1983
and June 15, 1983. Only one sample, on June 15, 1983 had a detected con
centration of 1.7 ppb of TCE in the surface water (Letter from Sandra
Eberhardt, ADHS to Tom Severino, EPA Region 9, Appendix A ) .
4.4 Outfall 003
Discharge from outlet 003 contains sewage from Goodyear Aerospace's
wastewater treatment plant. Total flow from the outfall is 30,500 gallons
per clay.
Effluent from the wastewater plant enters an inground pipe near the
treatment plant along the Litchfield Municipal Airport-Goodyear Aerospace
border (parallel to the railroad tracks) (see Figures 2.1 and 4.2), The
4-4
drain heads directly south along the tracks until Airport Road, After
Airport Road, it makes a turn west into the Litchfield Airport and runs
parallel to the drain which contains discharge from Goodyear Aerospace's
outfall 002, The treated sewage effluent from Goodyear Aerospace
Corporation is subsequently discharged into the main open ditch which runs
parallel to the runway at Litchfield Municipal Airport. No changes are
known to have been made to this drainage pattern from the sewage treatment
plant. It is possible that the drain was an open ditch between Goodyear
Aerospace and Airport Road but there is no solid evidence of this and it is
difficult to determine from looking at past aerial photographs.
4-5
V
OVERLAY 1 : OUTFALLS FROM GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION
I I I I
t t f I
FIGURE 4 .2 '
SCHEMATIC OF GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION AND PHOENIX-LITCHFIELD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
5.0 DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING AREA/ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS
5.1 Background
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, Arizona Division faces east on Litch
field Road in Goodyear, Arizona. It lies in the western Salt River Valley,
about 15 ..mi les west of Phoenix and 4 miles north of the confluence of the
Agua Fria and Gila Rivers. The facility is adjacent to the Phoenix-
Litchfield Municipal Airport and both are southwest of downtown Goodyear and
west of Avondale. The area north and northwest of the site is still
relatively undeveloped. Luke Air Force Base is located approximately 7
miles north of the site.
The surrounding area consists of flat desert with commercial, residen
tial, and industrial establishments. Much of the area is used for agri
cultural production. Water for irrigation is supplied by groundwater and
the Roosevelt and Buckeye Canals. Groundwater supplies all of the drinking
water to the population of Goodyear (population 2,700 in 1980) and Avondale
(population 8,100 in 1980). (Phoenix Litchfield Airport Area, RAMP, CH2M
Hill, July 1983.)
The climate in Goodyear is characterized by long, hot summers and
short, mild winters. The average annual temperature is 70 degrees
Fahrenheit and the average annual precipitation is about 7.5 inches. The
area is drained by the Agua Fria River which flows intermittently following
periods of heavy rainfall or after controlled releases from Waddell Dam.
The river may have' localized flow which is a result of flow from irrigation
canals and tailwater from irrigated fields.
As mentioned in Section 1,0, background hydrogeological information for
the area had already been compiled and can be found in two earlier reports
written on the Phoenix-Litchfield Airport Study Area. Information presented
in this section of the report therefore, will concentrate primarily on
groundwater data which directly relates to the Goodyear Aerospace Company
faci1ity.
5-1
5.2 Well Information
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation has four wells located on their pro
perty: wells #1, #2, #3 and #4 (see Figure 2.1 for well locations). Well
#1 is not used at all and has not been used for years by the facility. It or- ^
was shut down in either 1941 or 1942 and there is no power -fee—tl4e=f)ipes vJ;
to the pump. Randy Clark and Tom Heim were not- certain why the well was
abandoned but it was heard that the well had too high a salt content. Well
#2 is used as a back-up for well #4 which is the primary drinking water
source for the plant. Well #2 is used only about 3-4 weeks per year on
average. Well #3 is a fire system well. It is not hooked up to the
drinking water system. A brief summary of well characteristics are listed
in Table 5.1.
Laboratory reports of well samples from the Goodyear Aerospace
Corporation on-site wells were in Appendix III of their 3007 Letter Response
(on file at the EPA). Well samples have also been taken by the Arizona
Department of Health Services in December 1981 and the FIT Region IX in
September 1982. The TCE test results from these samples are listed in Table
5.2. The'test results of the inorganic analyses of the samples taken by the
FIT in September 1982 are summarized in Appendix F,
In reviewing the TCE test results for on-site wells at Goodyear
Aerospace in Table 5.2, it is seen that well #3 contains the highest con
centration of TCE with 49.9 ppb detected in March 1982 and 9.6 ppb detected
in September 1982. Both of these concentrations are above the recommended
SNARL (Suggested No Adverse Response Level) of 5.0 ppb for TCE*, From the
TCE test results, well #2 also contains a TCE concentration greater than the
SNARL with 7.3 ppb detected in September 1982. Test results showed that
well #4 contains low concentrations of TCE and in one test for well #4, TCE
was not detected (ND) in the laboratory.
* National Academy of Science Safe Drinking Water Concentration = 4.5 ppb. Value rounded to 5 ppb and adopted by the State of Arizona.
5-2
TABLE 5,1
GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION
ON-SITE WELL CHARACTERISTICS
cn I CJO
Well
#1
#2
#3
#4
State Well Number
Bl-1-16 AAC
Bl-1-16 AAB
Bl-1-16 AAA
Bl-1-16 ADB
Depth (feet)
325
330
320
302
Perforations (feet)
210-220, 280-290
195-219, 250-280
204-206, 224-238, 280-312
170-180, 266-294
Available Well Log
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Sampling Dates
No sampling data
12/09/81 09/02/82
03/23/82 03/24/82 09/02/82
12/09/81 09/02/82
Taken from: Remedial Action Master Plan, Phoenix-Litchfield Airport Area, CH2M HILL, August 1983
TABLE 5.2
TCE TEST RESULTS - GOODYEAR AEROSPACE 1£LLS
Well Nurber
1
2
3
. 4
Sdipling Date
• 12/09/81
12/09/81
12/09/81
09/02/82
03/23/82 .
03/24/82
09/02/82
12/09/81
12/09/31
12/09/81
09/02/82
Saipled By
GACA* & ADHS**
GACA&ADHS
GACA&ADHS
FIT
GACA
GACA
FIT
GACA&/CHS
GACA&ADHS
GACA&ADHS
FIT
Tested By
/sons
Engineers Test Lcb (Westem Technology)***
Metpath
Western Technology
Western Technology
W3HS
Engineers Test Lat
Metpath
le t Concentration
(parts per bill ion)
2.6
1.9
2.34
7,3
33.1
49,9
9,5
1,0
<1.0
2.0
LT
Notes
No sampling data. Well shut dcMi in 1941 or 1942. No power to pmp.
Same sarple analyzed by tiree different laboratories.
Same sarple analyzed by three different laboratories.
LT = Detected at less than the detection limit * = Goodyear Aerospace Corporation/Arizona
** = Arizona Departrent of Health Services *** = Engineers Test Lab has changed their nare to Westem Technology,
# Taken from: Goodyear Aerospace 3007 Letter Response, Appendix III, August 1982 and Litchfield Airport Study Area Workplan by the FIT, March 1983,
5-4
The results from the FIT sampling activities on September 2, 1982 have
been subjected to EPA's Region IX quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
review program and are considered valid results. The validity of previous
data collected by ADHS and Goodyear Aerospace Corporation are unknown at
this time due to the unavailability of laboratory QA/QC procedures.
Additional sampling data of the on-site wells may be obtained from the
Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of Water Quality Control. The
Bureau continues to sample wells and surface water in the Litchfield Study
Area including the Goodyear Aerospace Corporation on-site wells.
5-5
6.0 SUMMARY
A site inspection of Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, Arizona Division
was conducted by Suzanne Chaewsky and Greg Shepherd of the FIT on August 18,
1983. Also attending was Sandra Eberhardt from the Arizona Department of
Health Services, Bureau of Water Quality Control, Representatives of
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation present at the inspection were Tom Heim,
Personnel Director and Randy Clark, Environmental Coordinator, Tom Heim has
been at the Arizona Division since 1964 and Randy Clark started work at the
same facility in about 1977, The purpose of this inspection was to review
the information contained in Goodyear Aerospace Corporation's response to
EPA'.s §3007 information letter request dated August 27, 1982 and take a tour
of the facility with a company representative that was familiar with both
past and present practices.
The inspection was initiated with a meeting with Tom Heim and Randy
Clark to discuss the purpose of the inspection. At this time we reviewed
the information in their 3007 Letter Response. We also requested additional
information on the plant's past operations, waste management practices and
sewer system that we felt were given inadequate explanations or insufficient
data in their response. Two blueprints were presented to us during the
meeting, one of the storm and sanitary sewers at the facility (Plate 1) and
the second one of the facility and the surrounding area (Plate 2).
We were informed prior to the inspection that we would not be allowed
to take our own photographs while on-site. If we desired photographs, they
would be taken by Goodyear Aerospace and then subject to their security
check and clearance before being released. We did not request photographs
during the site inspection. A request can be made to Goodyear Aerospace for
photographs of specific items should a future need for them arise.
After the meeting we were given a tour of the facility. We were some
what restricted in what we could see in the tour for security reasons. We
started at the southern end of the site and observed the locations of the
6-1
old sludge drying beds. We then proceeded to walk north past the waste
storage area and the sewage treatment plant and its associated sludge drying
bed. As mentioned in Section 3.1, we were shown a degreasing operation
which involved a large degreaser with freeboard and still and then we toured
the chromate treatment plant. The manufacturing sections of the plant are
large open areas where many small operations take place. Many of the
smaller buildings on-site contain offices and classrooms.
From the Goodyear Aerospace Corporation site inspection and their 3007
Letter Response there are still information deficiencies with regard to
their past waste disposal practices. Essentially no information is known
about solvent disposal during the first twenty-five years of the facility's
operation. Their 3007 Letter Response states that in 1971 solvents were
evaporated in one of their on-site drying beds. It then states that the
amount of solvent disposed of in this manner are unknown. It also states
that there is a possibility that small amounts of trichloroethylene were
added to this drying bed. Off-site disposal of solvents is not well
documented prior to 1974, Goodyear Aerospace Corporation (3007 Letter
Response) states that records such as invoices or purchase orders for
solvent reclaimers were never issued because waste solvents were normally
transported from this facility by the reclaimer with no-charge to either
party.
Regarding the disposal of other wastes at the facility we know that
there were three on-site sludge drying beds. The two smaller drying beds
were in use prior to the larger drying plant which was installed in the mid-
1970' s. According to the plant's 3007 Letter Response, sludge was disposed
in the larger bed until 1980 and the two smaller beds until 1976. The
chromate treatment plant was installed in the mid-1970's to treat dilute
process rinsewaters and before that the process rinsewaters were probably
directly discharged via outfall 002 (see Figures 2.1 and 4.2). The con
centrated process tank solutions (containing high levels of chromium from
sodium dichromate) were bench treated and disposed of on-site in the drying
beds.
6-2
In order to access the possible contribution by Goodyear Aerospace
Corporation to the TCE groundwater contamination problem in the Litchfield
Study Area, an examination into the possible routes by which TCE could have
entered the groundwater is necessary. There are three possible ways which
may have led to potential TCE releases into the environment from the plant:
1. Discharge of TCE with effluent from outfall 001 or outfall 002,
2. Disposal of TCE with other solvents in the sludge drying beds,
3. Direct spills of TCE from negligence or poor housekeeping practices.
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation has not produced documentation on the
composition of the effluent discharged from their outfalls during the period
when they used TCE at the plant. In Section 3.3.1 of this report, it was
stated that the chromate treatment plant was installed in the mid-1970's to
treat process rinsewaters before discharging them into the sewer. If rinse
waters were directly discharged into the sewer without treatment perhaps
trichloroethylene and other solvents were discharged along with the rinse
waters .
The facility's 1981 NPDES Permit Application did show an unexplained
TCE concentration of 47 ppb from outfall 001 for the first sample. Company
representatives claimed that this value was invalid due to lab error and a
second sample was taken. This second sample however, was not tested for TCE
since, according to Randy Clark of Goodyear Aerospace, the facility no
longer used TCE. It is important to note here that any discharge into the
sewers eventually flow into open drains which may or may not have been lined
during the entire period of Goodyear Aerospace Corporation's operation.
Since only documented (3007 Letter Response) on-site disposal was of
sludges and solvents in the sludge drying beds (see Figure 2.1) it is pos
sible that trichloroethylene was also disposed of these drying beds. The
drying bed contents and lining were removed in 1980 and only an inorganic
analysis of this material and the. soil was performed (see Appendix C ) ,
6-3
Since an organic analysis was not performed on this material, there is no
data available which either proves or disproves the theory of TCE disposal
in this manner. If TCE had been disposed in these beds, subsequent
migration vertically into the groundwater or laterally into the nearby
drains is possible. These beds are located near Litchfield Airport Well #3
which has the highest TCE concentration in the study area. Although ac
cording to the 3007 Letter Response these beds were rubber lined there is no
way to know the condition of these liners. If they leaked, materials could
have leached into the ground.
It is known for certain that the Arizona Division of Goodyear Aerospace
Corporation used a high volume of trichloroethylene in their degreasing
operations prior to 1974. Incidental spills of virgin or waste TCE could
have led to TCE contaminating the groundwater from percolation directly
through the soil or from being discharged as surface runoff from one of the
plant's outfalls. The occurence of on-site spills of this nature would be
nearly impossible to prove. Most of the facility is paved which would
prevent direct discharge into the soil and there are no incidents of on-site
spills, fires or explosions on r e c o r d .
6-4
7.0 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Further investigative work is recommended by the FIT with regard to the
possible contribution by the Arizona Division of Goodyear Aerospace
Corporation to the TCE groundwater contamination in the Phoenix-Litchfield
Airport Study Area. Future work should include but not be limited to:
1. Additional sampling of the site and surrounding area,
2. Further industry research to investigate solvent use and disposal at the facility, and
3. Conducting interviews with past and current employees of the facility who may be familiar with past waste management practices at the plant.
7.1 Additional Sampling
A routine scheduled sampling program of all wells on-site the site of
the drying beds, the drainage ditches and the surrounding area is recom
mended. This is accomplished through the development of a detailed sampling
plan of the site. Routine sampling will enable close monitoring of the TCE
contamination and any changes that might occur. A summary of the TCE test
results from well sampling at the Goodyear Aerospace Corporation plant to
date is listed in Table 5.2.
The installation of monitoring wells on-site and nearby could help
further define the contaminant plume and could possibly assess any contri
bution of contamination by the Goodyear Aerospace facility. An effort to
get Goodyear Aerospace Well #1 on-line would provide an additional well to
sampling.
7.2 Industry Research
Based on the Goodyear Aerospace Corporation 3007 Letter Response and
the site inspection, it is evident that additional research is necessary to
evaluate chlorinated solvent use and waste management practices at their
f ac i 1 i ty.
7-1
First, according to their 3007 Letter Response, Goodyear Aerospace
Corporation may have shipped chlorinated solvents to • reclaimers prior to
1974. They have no records of transactions with waste reclaimers because
"reclaimed solvents are normally transported from this facility by the
reclaimer with no-charge to either party, it is Mlikely that invoices or
purchase orders for such shipments would not have been issued, and no record
of the shipment would exist" (3007 Letter Response), It would be highly
valuable therefore to conduct an investigation into the historical use of
reclaimed chlorinated solvents in the Phoenix metropolitan area and the
types of reclaimers, waste haulers and waste recyclers that were operating
in the Goodyear-Litchfield area prior to 1974.
Insufficient information exists on the volume of waste chlorinated
solvents generated prior to 1974. Since past records of waste chlorinated
solvents generation are hot available, a records search by Goodyear
Aerospace Corporation to locate past contracts which required the largest
volume purchases of chlorinated solvents. These records along with an
estimation of the volume of waste solvent generated per volume solvent used
may be incorporated to approximate the annual, volume of chlorinated solvents
generated at the facility. Tom Heim of Goodyear Aerospace Corporation did
estimate during the inspection that the switchover from trichloroethylene
use to 1,1,1-trichloroethane use was approximately 1 to 1 on a volume basis
(see Section 3.2.1).
7.3 Interviews with Past and Current Employees
Due to the apparent lack of concrete documentation of solvent disposal
prior to 1974 on the part of Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, interviews with
past employees of the plant could yield some yery useful information. Tom
Heim, Personnel Director at the plant could be instrumental in providing
names by current and past employees of Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, who
were working at the Arizona Division anytime during the period of 1949 to
around 1974.
7-2
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY MATRIX OF CONTACTS
(All Contact Reports on File)
SUMMARY MATRIX OF CONTACTS
AGENCY CONTACT PERSON CONTACTED DATE SUBJECT
Arizona Department of Health Services
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation
Sandra Eberhardt
Tom Heim, Personnel Director
Tom Heim, Personnal Director
Aug. 4, 1983
Aug. 8, 1983
Aug. 22, 1983
Goodyear ' Aerospace Corp. site inspection
Confirmation of upcoming site inspect ion
Corrections of statements made during site inspection
vT __. ' j
Km. ' '- " /
UNITED STATES E N V I R O N M E N T A L PROTECTION A G E N C Y
' " - ^ P R O ^ " REGION IX
2 1 5 Fremont Street
San Francisco, Ca. 9 4 1 0 5
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
In Reply Refer to: T-3-1
JUL 2 3 1982
j Tom Heim 'i Goodyear Aerospace Corp. j Arizona Division
Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340
Dear Mr. Heim:
i
I I ^ The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is conducting 'i an investigation of groundwater contamination in the vicinity i of the Litchfield Airport. The purpose of the investigation
is.to determine the nature, cause, and extent of contamination in the area and to assess the effects of the contamination on the environment and the public health.
As part of this investigation the EPA is in critical need of historical and present information which has been generated or obtained by a variety of parties in the Litchfield Area. The EPA has reason to believe that your company may be in possession of critical information and, for that reason, I make the following request for information pursuant
i to §3007(a) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1 (RCRA) and Section 104(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental i) Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA): I , . . j 1. Description of the purpose and operations of your companv, j including a detailed description of any hazardous waste :\ storage, treatment, or disposal operations. I 2. A detailed description of all past and present usage of I . chlorinated solvents at this facility, including but ] not limited to 1,1 Dichloroethylene, 1,1,2 Trichloroethylene, -; and 1,1,1, Trichloroethane.
I 3. A complete inventory of all wastes that have been generated j by this facility, including but not limited to chlorinated ^ solvents. Include dates, types of wastes or chemical ' ' ^ ^ composition, and quantities.
-2-
4. A complete inventory of all wastes disposed of on-site or near your facility, including but not limited to chlorinated solvents. Include dates, types of wastes or chemical composition, quantities, and methods and locations of disposal.
5. If disposal of waste has been conducted off-site, name of transporter(s), locations of off-site disposal, and copies of supporting records.
6. Locations and detailed descriptions of all monitoring wells, supply wells, and injection wells at your facility.
7. All analyses from sampling of monitoring and supply wells at your facility.
8. Any information regarding use and disposal of chlorinated solvents by any person or business in the vicinity of Litchfield Airport.
9. Length of time your company has been at the present location and any information regarding former occupants of your present location and their hazardous waste practices.
Each response should include all activities of your company since commencement of operations. The scope of this request extends to all data independently developed or obtained by research on the part of your company, its attorneys, consultants, or any of their agents, consultants, or employees.
Under the provisions of Section 3007(a) of RCRA [42 USC §6927], the Administrator of EPA may require persons subject to RCRA to furnish information necessary for EPA to administer RCRA. Similarly, under Section 104(e) of CERCLA [42 USC §9604(e)], the Administrator of EPA may require persons subject to CERCLA to furnish information necessary for EPA to administer CERCLA.
Furtherm.ore, under Section 3008 of the RCRA [42 USC §6928] , failure to provide the information requested in this letter may result in an order requiring compliance or a civil action for appropriate relief. This Section also provides for criminal penalties for knowingly making a false statement.
EPA regulations governing confidentiality of business information are set forth in Part 2, Subpart B of Title 40. If any portion of the information submitted is entitled to confidential treatment, please assert a confidentiality claim in accordance with 40 CFR §2.2C3(b). If EPA determines
-3-
that the information so designated meets the criteria set forth in 40 CFR §2.208, the information will be disclosed only to the extent, and by means of the procedures, specified in 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B. EPA will construe the failure to furnish a confidentiality claim with your response to this letter as a waiver of that claim, and information may be made available to the public by EPA without further notice.
Your response to this request must be by letter, signed by you or a duly authorized official, and submitted to EPA within 15 days of receipt of this letter. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Jerelean Johnson at (415)974-7515 or Mr. John Rothman at (415)974-7453.
Your cooperation in this raatter is appreciated.
Sirfcerely yours,
•A
avid S. Mowday \ acting Director
,/Toxics & Waste Management Division
cc: AZ DOHS
CfHCt
August 4 , 1982 Or .-- '^ •
. -. l ;
SAH f l •.r.o
USEPA cc: T Heim (GAC-Arizona) Region IX 215 Freemont Street "-' San Francisco, CA 94105 C-';J
Attention: Mr John Rothman - ORC c£; •"- , ' _;
Re: Goodyear Aerospace Corporation Z-, S"^' '" Arizona Division ^- Letter David S Mowday/Tom Heim 7-23-82 c~~> Your Designation T-3-1 '~'
Sub: Telephone Conversation Rothman/Smerglia of 8-2-82
Dear Mr Rothman
Confirming our telephone conversation of August 2, 1982, Goodyear/Goodyear Aerospace Corporation will have an additional ten (10) working days to provide the data requested in the above referenced letter. This will make the final response date, August 30, 1982«
The following items as enumerated in the referenced letter represent our understanding of what is to be provided:
Item No.
2 "Past and present usage of chlorinated solvents , . . etc" includes quantities of materials employed.
3 "A complete inventory of all waste . . . etc." All wastes is taken to mean hazardous wastes identified under Cere la and RCRA and does not include any domestic wastes.
7 "All analysis from sampling of monitoring and supply wells . . . etc is understood to mean all available analytical data on the plant's wells.
Please advise should there be any questions concerning the above.
Very truly yours
^ M Smerglia, Section Head . /» Environmental Engineering
EJB /jlcj;^
] \l~) ecology a n d cnviroiinient, inc. '<--^ 120 HOWARD STREET, SUITE «640, SAN PRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105, TEL. 415-777-2811
Internalional Specialists in the Environmenlal Sciences
July 26, 1983
Mr. Tom Heim Goodyear Aerospace Corp.
• Arizona Division Litchfield Park, AZ 85340
Dear Mr. Heim,
EPA in conjunction with the Arizona Department of Health Services is currently initiating a remedial investigation into the groundwater contamination problem at the Litchfield Airport site, Goodyear Arizona. The remedial investigation will be conducted by EPA's prime contractor CH2M Hill under the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Coiripensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA).
In an effort to obtain the necessary information required to implement an effective approach to the problem, EPA has requested their subcontractor. Ecology and Environment, to conduct a site inspection of Goodyear Aerospace facility. During this inspection we v;ould like to accomplish or obtain specific information regarding the following:
1) A review of the information contained in your response to EPA's S3007 information letter request dated 9-2-82 concerning historical and current hazardous waste generation, storage, treatment and disposal practices.
2) Blueprints of the facility from its beginning in 1942 to the present time. These blueprints should clearly illustrate the locations of surface and subsurface drainage pathways (drains, ditches, sanitary sev\'ers, industrial outfalls).
3) Any maps or documents presenting accurate locations of all monitoring, supply or injection wells both past and present.
4) A comprehensive facility tour with a company representative that is familiar with both past and present operations.
We plan to be in Arizona during the week of August 15-19 and would like to schedule this meeting at a time convenient to you and your company re-
re-cycled paper
presentatives. I will'contact you to schedule the final date and time.
Should any questions arise in the meantime plase feel free to contact me at this office (415) 777-2811.
Sincerely,
Sue Chaewsky
SCrub
CONTACT REPORT
AGENCY:
ADDRESS:
PERSON CONTACTED:
PHONE NO.:
FROM:
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
cc:
Goodyear Aerospace Company
Goodyear, Arizona
Tom Heim Personnel Director
(602) 932-7010
Sue Chaewsky
File
August 22, 1983
Site inspection on August 18,
central file
1983
Tom Heim called me regarding several pieces of information he gave me at the site inspection conducted by the FIT on August 18, 1983:
1. At that time, he approximated that there were 10,000 employees at Goodyear Aerospace during World War II. He checked this after we left and found out that there were only about 7,000 employees at that time at the plant.
2. He corrected a statement made by him at the time of the visit regarding degreasers with freeboard chillers. He originally stated that.all of their degreasers had freeboard chillers; however, he corrected this statement and stated that not every degreaser had freeboard chillers.
3. He made reference to the manufacture of B-24 and B-25 planes during the visit. He now says that there were no such planes and that he had made a mistake.
SC:ub 8/23/83
CONTACT REPORT
AGENCY: Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, Arizona Division 101 S. Litchfield Road
ADDRESS: Litchfield Park, Arizona
PERSON tom Heim, Randy Clark CONTACTED:
PHONE NO.: (602) 932-7102
PROM: Suzanne Chaewsky
TO: File
DATE: September 14, 1983
SUBJECT: Requesting additionaTinformation on the plant
cc: central file
I had a 1ist of questions and issues requiring clarification by representatives of Goodyear Aerospace Corporation regarding their facility. Most of the questions were answered on the phone. Other questions required a little file searching by Tom Heim so he will return my call in a few days.
Clark: The following questions were answered by either Tom Heim or Randy
1. Why was the second sample from outlet 001 not tested for TCE?
Randy replied that he was more concerned about the higher trichloroethane concentration in the first sample than the TCE concentration. This was due to the fact that the plant no longer used TCE and that the trichloroethane concentration was 169 ppb (part per billion)and the TCE concentration was only 47 ppb.
2. Where is Goodyear Aerospace Corporation headquarters? Answer: Akron, Ohio.
3. Was there a second point of discharge for the effluent from outlet 001?
According to Tom Heim, there was another outlet discharging a portion of the 001 outlet discharge into the same sewer line as the 001 outlet. It was located south of the 001 outlet, near the southern airport - Goodyear Aerospace - driveway. He had no idea when this outlet was closed but he thinks it was soon after the plant opened in 1949. This outlet once drained the area around building 76 and ramp areas. Now everything discharges into the sewer from the same outlet. Tom Heim thinks that the second outlet was closed so that there would be one outlet instead of two which would make it easier for Goodyear Aerospace to monitor the effluent.
4. Was batch chromium treatment practiced in the 1950's? .
Tom Heim said that he does not know if chromium reduction was practiced before the chrome treatment plant was installed in the mid-1970's. He went on to explain the operation of the chrome treatment plant. Prior to the installation of the chrome treatment plant, rinsewater was discharged into the sewer from outlet 002. The chrome treatment plant was installed to treat this rinse-
, water. The chrome sludge generated from the rinsewater treatment has already been reduced from hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium. This sludge was deposited in the sludge drying beds until 1980. He did not know when on-site disposal of the sludge began. When process tanks containing high concentrations of chromium (as sodium dichromate) are cleaned out, a sludge is generated by neutralization. This sludge is batch treated with sodium bisulfite to reduce the hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium before being deposited in the on-site drying beds.
5. How many acres does Goodyear Aerospace Corporation occupy?
The answer: 100-110 acres if parking lot is included.
Several questions which Tom Heim had to do some checking on were:
1. . The years of peak plant operation?
2. Types of acids and quantities used at the plant?
3. How was TCE stored at the plant and where was it stored?
SC:ub 9/16/83
CONTACT REPORT
AGENCY:
ADDRESS:
PERSON CONTACTED:
PHONE NO.:
FROM:
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
cc:
Goodyear Aerospace Corporation, Arizona Divisioi 101 S. Litchfield Road, Litchfield Park, Arizon
Tom Heim
(602) 932-7102
Suzanne Chaewsky
File
September 20, 1983
Request for additional information on the plant
central file
This was a follow-up call from the call to Tom Heim on September 14, 1983. He provided the following information on the three previously unanswered questions:
1.
2.
SC:ub 9/20/83
Years of peak operation: during World War II
Types of acids used at the plant and quantities:
Mostly sulfuric, nitric, chromic and hydrochloric acids. Small volumes of acetic and hydrofluoric acids are used.
TCE storage: probably stored in 55-galIons drums near the buildings where the TCE was used.
/a?-/
% ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES '%'-C.-^y':'-^' Division of Enuironmental HeaUh Services
-•y-i ' .y
BRUCE BABBITT. Governor
Donald B. Mathis, Director
July 18, 1983
Tom Severino Superfund Enforcement Section EPA Region 9 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, California 94105
Dear Tom:
Re: The Gocxiyear Superfund Site and Goodyear Aerospace Corporation
Per our telephone conversation of 7/12/83, enclosed in Attachment A is a map and data showing locations, dates and analyses of surface water samples collected by the Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). It is apparent from the
' results that low levels of TCS are entering the Litchfield Airport (LAP) canal at some point upgradient of the tower. Attachment B, page 1, gives the three NPDES outfalls from the adjacent Goodyear Aerospace Coirporation (GAS) . Attachment B, pages 2 and 3, presents the concentrations of TCE and other volatile compounds in the outfalls as shown in the 6/3/81 GAS application for permit to discharge wastewater. The high TCE content of outfall number 001 was of particular interest I subsequently called Mr. Tom Heim of Goodyear Aerospace to determine where these
• outfalls entered the LAP canal. From his description of the drain locations. Attachment C, it appears there may be a connection between the 001 discharge and the levels found in, the ccinal.
It does not appear" that these TCE concentrations in the canal are of any great iir.portance since the canal is cement-lined and the TCE appears to volatilize before crossing Highway 80. Jiowever, it does raise the following questions:
1. According to the January 31, 1983 Litchfield Airport Area Site Investigation Workplan by Ecology and Environment, pages 4-12, TCE useage at Goodyear Aerospace was discontinued in 1974. How then, did the TCE appear in the 001 outfall in 1981? And where is the TCE recently detected coming from?
2. The NPDES permit describes the 001 discharge as non-contact process cooling water, building cooling and humidity water, storm water runoff and boiler blowdowm. None of these ghould contain TCE, so how do we account for the presence of TCE in the 001 effluent as documented in the ISSI,.application? It appears that there must- be some floor drains or other effluent sources that are not listed in the permit.
3. The "massive drainage system" at Litchfield Airport which receives the 001 effluent is probaibly from the 1940's when the .Airport was a naval air station. Does the drainage system leak and serve as a conduit, to the groundwater? There is a strong likelihood that the answer is yes.
The Deparlment of HeaUh Services is .-in Equal Opportunity .-Affirmative .-\ciion Employer. .-Ml Qualified men and women, mcludinf^ the handicapped, are encouraged to part icipate.
State Health Buildine 17j.n West Ad^m^ ^fr--t Phn^n^v ^-^-...v-.. Q-
Tom Severino July 18, 1983 Page Two
These questions point out some obvious directions for further investigation:
1. Sample all three Goodyear Aerospace Corporation outfalls at the source before they leave the property.
2. During the Goodyear Aerospace site investigation, determine if TCE is still being used.
3. Also during the site investigation, look for floor drains or any other connections between solvent using operations and the 001 outfall.
4. Obtain the engineering drawings of the Litchfield Airport and Goodyear Aerospace,Corporation storm drains and sewers to determine exact paths of the effluents between Goodyear Aerospace and their entry into the Litchfield Airport canal.
Finally, it is obvious from the site workplan that the on-site drying beds used by Goodyear Aerospace for disposal prior to October 1980 should be further investigated. The exact location and size of the drying beds should be determined, either from Goodyear employees or aerial photos. There may be a correlation between the high levels of chromium disposed in the beds and the high levels recently found in two Goodyear Aerospace walls. Attachment D, The historic disposal methods, sites and volumes should be further investigated also. It is apparent from the site workplan that sizeable quantities of chlorinated solvents have been used at this facility.
I hope these observations and suggestions are helpful in plainning the up-coming site investigation, and I will be trasmitting more new data to you in the near future.
Sincerely,
Sandra Eberhardt Groundwater Contamination Response Team Bureau of Water Quality Control
SE:ck Attachments
Attachment A
TCE Concentrations in Litchfield Airport Canal and Various Surface Discharges 7/12/83
Site No. Location (see attached map) TCE Cone Date Sampled 5/18 5/25 6/15
1. Canal on N. side of western - - ND, .3 Ave.
2. Canal near tower upgradient 3.0 - 5.1 of Bldg. 18 & 52 discharge
3. Discharge, probably Bldg. 0.8 - 1.2 18 & 52
'4. N. discharge, across from 3.1 - 0.9 WWTP; Mostly 002 from Goodyear Aerospace
5. S. discharger, across from WV7TP 0.7 -
6. Ccinal from Goodyear Aerospace - - 1.7 at the road to Litchfield-Airport.
7. Canal at Highway 80 - ND, .3
^zix:
AO|Vhca+;-on N(
Ai.jT:^OKi7.^no:i TO G I S L - . A - - : ; U^D::R 'z^t-
HATK^nAL PCLLUTAfjT Hi^ic-ARG^: I; ; ' ; iNAV:G' ; SV^r£M
In Lonpiianccr wi^h the p rov i sii^ns 'M" L^'i; ^ie;-n '.-facer .'^ct., /is ai^e' ^•'=^ Gt s e q . ; ^hc " A c ; " ;
P. 0. -ViO'.-. 85 : .'
D i i cha rqe . 5er-i-:i Ko. Discti '^rge Dc;;cr I ; . 1. I , . i I
Non-con!;, set; proceed:: COG r ing wa te r , b u i l d i n g conl iny .;:; humid i ty water , i l on r i •\-ic.".''-r r u n o f f , 6 boi 1 i-yr b 1 owfiuwn.
Kec:v t'.'i nij We;.ors
;-i;\npo'e v/sst of B;0^. ^16 '..: U'lnainea o i t c n , l i i ' i l^'urary L.J
L : i t i t u c e : 3S'- i!5' 54" fi Long i tude : i I 2" 2 1 ' ^"0" W
i lon-ccn tac t proce'i.^ coe: inq v/ater, b i i ' i l J i ng cooVwiq /•, '•uini^'i rv -.'rd^-iv . it.o;rn wavcr cunor r, ,s mnta . ;3 ter .
'iSe
Concrete i r r i g a t i o n c i t o i i 3 ::;et0!"3 i io'-th of C;''ri;crt -jcosss 'O j :ie:jr :"2i'r;.}ad t:•:^c•:^. Tr ib i iOory to B;.ickeve |C-.vi,i! .
L : i t i t i jCo : 33^ ?.S' 36" '! Lcng i tudo : 112^ 21 ' 33" W
!;(.: ..•uirf-'. L^c v;d:tev:,-i':;;-. r i i n o i r i t e r to jr;n.v;'eO cii to r i , t n , : ; j t n i - y to tuck^ye c r in i i .
r.l v.uae; .cro ; t i ide; i i Z' .-.t ,-i
•i ' f ! i ..O;i l: i i;(! i L.:a:i :-!•;. ;:!v..:ii ti.;i-i n-i r o c ' i -o i - ' i t i c;r:0 othei t ioos SOT footi i iil ? : : r z i '. , • I r i ! ;
: ; 11. i . ' r - f ' i ' i ' i : j i ; 'Co::\ ' 'M
: i - 1 ' o-'-'oi t OiiO ;.;;o OV.L! 00 oso. i * . • . • J •
: -.1 •/ .. .
. 1 :o
c o t i i '.Iii.itia f
I . P O L L U T A N T A f J O C A S N I J r.t b CL ,1
,'.; i i .^M.)
• ( / ' • • / -
: I '• V «. ,
Iv.i 'A i . l i . i M j i :•.....-. ft-.(I.v j
I AZD :iOS.^)8786
y^
a. 1.1 A V.IMi. 'M IJ/«H.V V A L K - f
I'CJ-rj rltACriON - v o l ATlLi; CCUi'lllJ.Mi'J^ ^.i;;/iri!!C(!>
2VV. l.J.l-Tii-
(_M tL i ' i i l i av . I . i . i Tfi-chiof ow:hi/.n tJ-.yoo 5)
i yv . Tfictiloro-
. t l i y l . i t . (70-0 t -b i
.T>V. Tr lc lworo
l / l ) b i •*!
J . ' l ^ . M.sh/ lo.- i i ; Ch l f i . i JH (VS 09 i J
i i v ' i . i . j . a T . t i i i chK-i/ouidar-u (V!( ."..t 5 !
.^'IV. Tt t<'a.:hlOfO
' ICtJ iJU J j
:.*'ivi'. 1 ,1 -Tr .n i -I' iL-hlufCC'.hyl.ns:
Ct . l o , ! . ) . ( V I J O I 4)
BDl^
mv, ' ' vV
IK)L
liDL
4 /
bOl,
l i l J l ,
GC/aa FRACTION - Ai:(OCiiWfOLl!JCj
2 A . 2.-4 Dlc l i l i i fO p l . t tnoi ( U < i 8 3 1'l
S.u. a . -VQin io l l i y l I ' l i i i i o l ( IO&.67- 'J|
»A. ^.B Olniir<i-CJ
:i>.. Z',4-r) lnt: j J-i - j i . r i i ; ; ( l i l ifa 5)
i>A a H i l i .V jhw i io l
? A . • lNiUO()l ' ' . i»*. i
e A.. p .C l i lo ro M C.v io l (t.'J 60 7|
ii A. f- . i i l i ic l i tofC. p i i uno l laV Bu Ol
IOA. l ' l i». .ol < ICki 3!, 21
1 I A . 2,4.6 T i l -
\'.S(L 00-21
X
A
I-C
X
;:
.•-I
X
Y.
>C
X
X
BDL
BDI,
iilJI..
BJii,
1)01
UUL
6
UDL
(bi::LOW DLTKCTAULE
0 . ^A-
13
_ _ 3. EK£^U_eriT L'. M"^"xlMVl'tVi»'"p'oXy v"ALur
f ' l / ci-JtI.iO/e;
1.5
. ^ . 0 . 2
. L O N G T E / I M ;\ (if nuaiiahie) l>)
C f l 1 11 ri M 1 ft * I > . ) r«
iT I ' l i i}—
1.) M . L .
4 IS .>. o *• » ' JAL-VS£S
1-
1
/ uri i Ajiuroiid 0,'.!L! .'^^HLL-'-.^ J)/.)
I) C O M . - t t ' l 1 H I * r n V N
• u-^/I
l i s / I
u g / l
u a / l
llg/J^
111.;/I
, / i
"it i /1
>!C/1
J g / 1
UP/1
^ig/^l_
••g/ l
l i i ' / l
u g / 1
a. LOrJ G T K R M
8
>. n. . . i.-
:n|.rri>'i;f' o^i d'Vi-dSt-'
/.2.n 0( I I J N : | I U H (.~o/.y I, 'III j l Z i i l I 3 ^ ^ K l " / ^ i C j i ' T r A ' t ^ i - K l . r . i h i : f l I t|v
r o n n A p r i i u i u i l O.M!. 'No. l!>b'-fiOI7.T ' \ ^ ;
-Attachment C
Notes of Sandra Eberhardt conversation with Tom Hein of Goodyear Aerospace (GAS) 7/11/83.
Discharge 001 is at GAS Bldg. 16 (not Litchfield Airport Bldg. 16). It enters the underground system at Litchfield .Airport (LAP) which is a "massive drainage system" which eventually dumps into the canal on LAP underground before the canal emerges near the tower on the south side of the riinway.
Discharge 002 is an open canal which goes southwest from GAS, crosses the LAP access road near the railroad track, then goes underground to dump into the LAP Canal at the "twin pipes" across from the LAP wastewater treatment facility.
Discharge 003 is underground the whole way and closely parallels 002. At the point 002 dumps into the LAP Canal it also contains 003 in a combined effluent. 003 runs through a manhole at an undefined location on the LAP. It is primarily a sanitary effluent.
A // .(ZzA /77g.yi r- J^,
Arizona Testing Laboratori-2s 317 West Wadison • Phofinix, ArLrona a;:007 • • Tciechcne 2I34-G181
A.rizona Depar t rnent c f H e a l t h S e r v i c e s Fcr: Pixabient Water Q u a i i t y
.M-.tn: Ms. Sandra Eberha.r-:lt 1740 West .a^dams P h o e n i x , Ar i zona 85007
Date: J u n e 28 , 1983
Lub. No.: .1701
Sample: W a t e r
Rocsived: June 15 , 1933
.Submiriad bv: sara.-5 .
Mui'ked: Your ? ' . : rchase Order #H 15671
REPORT Or LABORATORY T^STS
D.Lim.
0.01 . 0 . 5 0.005 0.01 0.2 0.02 0.1 C.005 0.5 3. 0.02 .i .
0.05 0.2 0.05
O.i 3.
iO. 0 .05 O.i
1
Element
Arsenic Dar-ium Cad.-nium Chromium Fluoride Lead Nitrate N Selenium Calcium Chloride^' Copper T. Hardness Iron"* Magnesiun MaOiOanese pH Scdium Su Lfate'*' TDS Zinc Pota.S3 ium ' Carbonate
:3io:arbonr-te I: . C . ,
.:.{• 0
T'. icromo.os
25aaa
nil nil nil 0.011 r\ '
nil 7.0
m i
q.3 0Q) nil
974 0.08
• 120 nil 7-7
815 (52|) 3 2 20
;-i.i 9.0 0
3 59 5000
.rAi .-.u A"f- :i('^ ••
2 2 bbb
nil nil nii 0.011
nil nj_l
tlsTj) nil
>ao. 0.259) '""hil 202 3
0.06 200 nil 7.6
^ 1
(5£y 3 250
nii 9.0 n
'.I 5 9 5900
J.
GAS-2
nil nil ni>-4 (fios-dTT"
, nil 5.5
nil 98
246 nil
45-j ^ Cc . 3 2) 5 2^^^ nil 3. I
94 164 300
0.2c 4.6 0
120 1350
Re;
GAS-3
ni.I •
nil / n U ^
\) ().03i) d": J
nil 6.8
nil 115
nil 513
O . 3C3 56 nil 3.2
82 164 390
0.10 4.3 0
129 1400
GA.S-4
ni.I . ni.I
nil 0.016 0..2
ni 1 f.\ _ ;;
nii 134 (3'04/
n i. .1. • 664
0 . 26 SO nil 0 . .::
39 150
1090 0.10 6.1 0
1 2.2 1630
jpectfijlly suhniitred.
LAP-2
nii nil nil 0.019 0.2
nil 7.9
nii 103 C^O'^ nil
570 0,13
73 nil 3.1 •
9 3 ••
101 IOOO
m l 5 .9 0
102 1650
V ^^ 1 ^ O i V r \ i 'NG ABCR.i.TCRIc;
. " i i ' / e n . c : . i . \ . . . ; ;
APPENDIX B
GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION
§3007 LETTER RESPONSE
GOODYEAR AEROSPACE C O R P O R A T I O N
A R I Z O N A D I V I S I O N
LITCHFIELD PARK, ARIZONA 85340 , ">
August 27, 1982 ^ \ . - • : ' •'-.'N
' t David S. Mowday, Acting Director ^ Toxic and Waste Management Division U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, California 94105
RE: Request for Information EFA #T-3-1
Dear Mr. Mowday:
In response to your Section 3007(a) RCRA and Section 104(e) CERCLA requests for information from our Litchfield Park, Arizona Goodyear Aerospace Corporation plant, we respectfully submit the enclosed information which, to the best of my knowledge and belief, represents the most accurate answers to your July 23, 1982 T-3-1 inquiry. Please note that this response is in part based on discussions with knowledgeable Litchfield Park Goodyear Aerospace Corporation employees and estimates, based on known prior material usage. Copies of support documents, where available and pertinent, have also been used in answering your questions.
Very truly yours,
0
N! L. Laden Plant Manager
ch
Enc.
QUESTION 1:
Description of the purpose and operations of your company, including a detailed description of any hazardous waste storage, treatment, or disposal operations.
ANSWER:
Goodyear Aerospace, Arizona Division, is involved in the development and manufacture of various aerospace related products. Major operations at the present time are as follows:
1) Electronics equipment manufacture, chiefly radar.
2) Transparent products manufacture, chiefly aircraft and automobile windshields and windows.
3) Structural manufacturing, chiefly MX missile transporter, and bonded aluminum-skinned shelters.
A substantial portion of the work at this facility involves research and development and production of very small quantities of a particular product. For this reason the nature and size of company operations changes continuously.
Goodyear. Aerospace has submitted a part A application for a waste treatment and storage facility. Waste treatment at this plant involves the chemical reduction and removal of chromium from approximately 5,000 gallons per day of rinse water from anodizing and aluminum cleaning operations. Incoming water to the treatment plant generally contains 5 mg/l or less of chromium and discharge water is held to less than 0.5 mg/l under an NPDES permit.
Waste storage at this facility consists of tanks containing chromium sludge from the treatment facility and small quantities of nickel, lead, tin, and copper. Also various wastes including chlorinated solvents are stored in drums at the facility. No hazardou'; wa itP-; arp disposed of at this facility. ATI wastes are removed for off-site disposal.
QUESTION 2:
A detailed description of all past and present usage of chlorinated solvents at this facility, including but not limited to 1,1 Dichloroethylene; 1,1,2 Trichloroethylene; and 1,1, 1 Trichloroethane.
ANSWER:
A list of chlorinated solvents purchased in past years is tabulated on Table I. The list is compiled from Purchasing and Stores records for the materials. Records of this type are often discarded at this facility when they become two to three years old, particularly if use of the material in question has been discontinued. For this reason, some quantities oi chlorinated solvents may have been used for which there are no hard records and which are not listed on the Table.
Extensive use of 1,1,1 trichloroethane began in 1974 as a degreaser solvent. Small quantities are also used for hand cleaning of parts and as a solvent for cements. Trichloroethane is stored in a 5,000 gallon tank at this facility. Because the amounts shown on Table I are based on purchases only, actual use of the material during a particular year may be different from the amount shown due to inventory changes in the amount remaining in storage.
Methylene chloride is used for hand cleaning of materials and the amounts shown are probably accurate over the full time period. Again, there is probably some variation between the amount purchased and the amount used due to changing inventory.
Use of Freon TE and TF as a degreaser fluid began at this facility with the purchase of degreasers in late 1976 and in September of 1977. The amounts of trichloro-trifluorethane listed in the Table should be close to the total history of its use here.
It is known that trichloroethylene was used extensively as a degreaser at this facility before 1974, at which time its use was discontinued, but there are no records of the purchases remaining. It was used in a manner similar to the present use of 1,1,1 trichloroethane. It is believed that this and the solvents listed in Table I are the only chlorinated solvents that have been used in significant quantities at this facility. It is likely that small quantities of other solvents have been used in laboratories and have been present as a solvent in purchased cements and other products, but there is no record of such use and the quantities would have been quite small.
To give a better idea of the quantities of waste chlorinated solvents generated by this facility in the years for which there are no records, a history of the major degreasers used by this facility is shown on Table IA. When using this list the following points should be considered:
1) There is no operating record for the degreasers. The quantities of materials cleaned in a given time vary considerably, and the equipment may have been shutdown for lengthy periods.
ANSWER TO QUESTION 2 continued:
2) The presence of a freeboard chiller is significant when comparing the quantity of solvent used to the amount of waste generated. A freeboard chiller substantially reduces the loss of solvent, and a degreaser using one would use substantially less new solvent per unit of dirty solvent generated.
3) The presence of a still substantially reduces the amount of waste solvent generated by cleaning dirty solvent and recycling it.
4) The rate of solvent loss is different for different solvents. It is estimated that under similar working conditions the loss through vaporization of 1,1,1 trichloroethane is 70% of that of tri^loro-ethylene. For this reason the amount of solvent purchasedjiper gallon of waste generated would be lower for 1,1,1 trichloroethane.
8/12/82
TABLE I
CHLORINATED SOLVENTS
PURCHASING RECORDS
YEAR GALLONS PURCHASED
1,1,1 TRICHLORO- METHYLENE 1,1,2 TRICHLORO-ETHANE CHLORIDE 2,1,1 TRIFLUOROETHANE
1972 330
1973 55 420
1974 . 250 0
1975 '580 9
1976 . . . . . . . . .1,170 9
1977 .5,825 55 770
1978 12.730 55 1,545
1979 5,721 55 1,405
1980 . . . . . . .. .1,320 110 .. . . . . 880
1981 5,440 110 . . . . . . 1,965
TABLE IA DEGREASER HISTORY
b / \ C I O L
DEGREASER DATE INSTALL
OATE REMOVED
SOLVENT USED STILL?
FREEBOARD CHILLER?
ESTIMATED CURRENT SOLVENT USED GAL/YEAR
ESTIMATED CURRENT WASTE GENERATED GAL/YEAR
APPROXIMATE SIZE L X W
D-560 #25-4587
D-541 #25-4608
D-800 Bondolite
#25-2117
D-574 #25-4625
#25-4175
7-76
5-77
6-73
4-51
9-77
12-67
—
—
—
1973
—
1974
Freon TE
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
1,1,1 Tricholo-ethane
Trichloroethylene
Freon TE & TF
Trichloroethylene
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
NO
1200
800
4800
—
200
—
150
400
200
—
50
—
10'xl6"
6'x3'
27' X 6'
20' X 4'
5' X 2'
30' X 4'
QUESTION 3:
A complete inventory of all wastes that have been generated by this facility, including but not limited to chlorinated solvents. Include dates, types of wastes or chemical composition, and quantities.
ANSWER:
Waste generation records per se have not been maintained at this facility. This question is best addressed by reviewing the following answers to items 5 and 6 on off-site and on-site waste disposal.
QUESTION 4:
A complete inventory of all waste disposed of on-site or near your facility, including but not limited to chlorinated solvents. Include dates, types of wastes or chemical composition, quantities, and methods and location of disposal.
ANSWER:
Prior to October of 1980 treated wastes from anodizing, metal etching, plating and plastics polishing were disposed of in a large drying bed and two small drying beds on the south end of this plant. Below is an estimate of the quantities of material disposed:
CHROMIUM (TRIVALENT)
CHROMIUM (HEXAVALENT)
CADMIUM
NICKEL
ZINC
COPPER
LEAD
NON-HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL SALTS (Primarily sodium sulfate)
GROUND GLASS & PLASTIC POLISHING COMPOUND
TOTAL
24,341 lb.
144 lb.
54 1b.
132 lb.
202 lb.
428 lb.
463 lb.
442,361 lb.
61,250 lb.
529,375 lb.
The above amounts are based on an analysis of the drying beds and knowledge of the processes producing the wastes. .These are the only known disposal sites for wastes of this type prior to October of 1980. This material was removed in October and Novejnber of 1980, along with about 275,000 pounds of rubberized fabric and soil. The fabric was used as a liner for the drying beds.
ANSWER TO QUESTION 4 continued:
In 1971 solvents were evaporated in one of the drying beds. The bed was lined with rubber-coated fabric and the solvent contained substantial amounts of neoprene, epoxy, and urethane. The remaining rubbery mass after evaporation was disposed of off-site as indicated above.
The amount of solvent disposed of in this manner is not known. These solvents consisted mainly of methyl ethyl ketone and toluene. In ; addition, about S% of the solvents generated at the time would have been alcohol, acetone, and naptha. There is a possibility that small quantities of trichloroethylene were added to the drying bed but this .-is not considered likely.
QUESTION 5:
If disposal of waste has been conducted off-site, name of transporter(s), locations of off-site disposal, and copies of supporting records.
ANSWER:
Attached in Appendix I is all the available information on off-site disposal of hazardous wastes. The pre-1981 information is summarized on Table II and the 1981-and-after information is summarized in the copies of the quarterly reports which were sent to the Arizona Health Department.
The material shipped from 1969 through 1979 consisted primarily of toluene and methyl ethyl ketone mixed with neoprene, epoxy, and urethane cements or adhesive wastes. Because a substantial portion of these drums were only partially full, and because sometimes the majority of their contents were non-hazardous resins and solids, the actual amount of solvent disposed of cannot be determined.
The flammable solvents listed on the quarterly reports comes primarily from cleaning parts and molds in transparencies manufacture and from paint booths. The solvents consist of approximately 50% toluene and 25% acetone with the remainder being a vairying mixture of alcohols, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl methacrylate, methylene chloride, naptha and lacquer thinner. Quantities of material from these sources vary but is estimated to be 2,000 to 6,000 gallons per year.
The trichloroethylene shipped to Southwest Solvents in July of 1980 had been in storage at this facility for more than six year. This is probably the material which was removed from the degreasers in 1974 when the use of trichloroethylene was discontinued. There may have been earlier shipments of chlorinated solvents to reclaimers. Because reclaimed solvents are normally transported from this facility by the reclaimer with no-charge to either party, it is likely that invoices or purchase orders for such shipments would not have been issued, and no record of the shipment would exist.
TABLE II
8/3/82
PAST OFF-SITE DISPOSAL SITES
(1980 & Before)
NO. OF
FACILITY
Phoenix Fire Dept. 28th St. & Buckeye Road Phoenix, Arizona
Air Force Gunnery Range Gila Bend, Arizona
Salt River Landfill Project Maricopa Indian Coirenunity 40005 S. McDowell Road Scottsdale,, Arizona
Kaibab Industries 2600 So. 20th Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85009
(Reclaimed)
Southwest Solvents 6760 West Allison Road Chandler, Arizona
(Reclaimed)
•
DATE
10/23/69
6/71 12/71
9/23/69 6/17/70 6/24/70 12/21/70 12/22/70 7/13/71 7/14/71 11/22/71 7/10/72
7/11/72
4/11/73
4/13/73 4/20/73 1/29/74 1/30/74 1/31/74 4/4/74 8/8/74 10/18/74 n/22/74 12/13/74 4/9/75 1 6/26/75 7/8/76 1 12/14/78 1/3/79 2/6/79
7/17/80
8/5/80
55 GAL. DRUMS
91
1 295 108
.150 160 165 207 205 138 145 295 150
116
240
150 160 144 312 154 156 156 154 156 27 156 54 28 200 144 170
20
23
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Flammable Solvents
Waste Solvent Waste Solvent
Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Waste Material Partially full Drum Waste Partially full Drum Waste Partially full Drum Waste Waste Epoxy-Cement
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Waste Oil
Chlorinated Sol (Trichloroethyl
TRANSPORTER
Valdez Transfer & Storage
1310 N. 22nd Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85009
H & R Transfer Address Unknown
Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer Valdez Transfer H & R Transfer H & R Transfer H & R Transfer H & R Transfer
H & R Transfer
H & R Transfer
H & R Transfer II
II
II
II
II
II
Not Known H & R Transfer GACA H & R Transfer GACA GACA Valdez Transfer
II
II
Kaibab Industries
vent sne)
Southwest Solvents
Past Off-Site Disoosal Sites continued Page 2
FACILITY
Simi Valley Landfill Ventura Regional Co. Sanitation District P. 0. Box AB VentOra, CA 93002 EPA #CAD990658395
BKK Landfill 2210 S. Azusa West Covina. CA 91791 EPA #CAD067786749
OATE
11/3/80
11/24/80
10/80/80 11/80 12/80
NO. OF 55 GAL. DRUMS
21 tons
1000 gal.
79.2 tons 262.2 tons 20.6 tons
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
Dirt & Heavy Metals
Mixed Waste ^rtl v/on'hc
TRANSPORTER
Overley's Inc. 650 W. Southern Mesa, AZ 85202
. Overley's Inc.
Dirt & Heavy Metals Dirt & Heavy Metals Oirt & Heavy Metals
II
II
II
GENERATOR AlillDAL REPQRT/TSD I M l 11 I III i I I Mi REPORT
(1) FACILITY NAI
(2) LOCATION:
(3) COUNTY
( 7 ) WASTE TYPE
^ E M I C A L HAME OR
SLUDGE
FLAMMABLE SOLVENTS
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS
^ \
•
•
•
^' GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORP.
101 S . L ITCHF IELD RO.
MARICOPA
lEPAHAZARO-IIOSHA.STFNO.
. D007 ^ •
F005
FOOl
'
.
' (a) GENERATED ON-SITE
AHOUHT
74,000p
8 ,400p
3,000p
tITCHFIELO PARK; AZ.
(9 ) RECEIVEO FROH OFF-SITE
WIOUNT
•
- 0 -
-0-
-0-
-
y
( 4 ) EPA 10 NUMBER: A 2 0 0 0 8 3 9 8 7 8 6
( 5 ) TYPE: G , T . S
,.^ QUARTERLY REPORT ^ ° l nilARTFRt 1 VEAR: 81
( 1 0 ) INTRASTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMEHTS
AHOUNT
- 0 - ^
-0-
-0-
- • -
mm NUMBER
•
OESTIHATIOH
•
• •
•
•
•
ANNUAL REPORT YFARJ
( 1 1 ) INTERSTATE HAZARDOUS HASTE SHIPMENTS
AMOUNT
84.000P
•
- 0 -
-0-
"
,
•
.
UN/NA NUHBER DESTINATION
BKK L a n d f i l l . . g , g , , CAD067786749 "'^^'** 221 S. Azusa
• West C o v i n a , CA T r a n s p o r t e d by Chemica l D i s p o s a l Co. I n c . and Overley's Inc.
*
•
•
.
!a(3t^^t
4-13-82 Oate Signature
ENVIRONHENTAL 'COORDINATOR • mw
MSTETVPE (con ' t from reverse)
EPA J
I 0007
F005
FOOl
®
(12) IM STORAGE OM-SITEATENDOF REPORTING PERIOD
! AMOUNT
7,000p
110,440p
8,400p
' • •
HETHOO
1 S02
1 SOl
1 SOl
•
( 1 3 ) TOTAL TREATED ON-SITE
AMQUNT
- - 0 -
- 0 - -
-0-
t .. . . . .
METHOO
-
'
1 '
:
; ( 1 4 ) TOTAL OISCK^GEO 1 TO SEWER OR HATERS 1 OF THEU. S .
AHOUHT
- 0 -• 1
-0-
-0-
,
\ . . . .
' .
METHOO
( 1 5 ) TOTAL OISPOSEO OH-SITE
1 AHOUtlT
-0-
-0-
-0-
• j
1 """
•
IMETHOD
1
1 1
1(16) TOTAL RECYCLED OFF-S ITE
1 AHOUMT
. - 0 -
-0-
-0-
1 DESTINATION
• •
GENERATOR ANilliAL R E P ^ T S D FACI l l t y QUARTEBLY REPORT
9 i
^ ^ ' ^
(1) FACILITY NAME: GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION'
(2) LOCATION: 101 S. LITCHFIELD RO., LITCHFIELD PARK, AZ
(3) COUNTY: MARICOPA
(7) WASTE TYPE
gi»ir"' CHROMIUM SLUDGE
FLAMMABLE SOLVENTS
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS
EPA HAZAROOUS WASTENO
D007
F005
FOOl
i
*
(8) GENERATED ON-SITE
AMOUNT
40,000p
7,600p
2,400p
:9)RECEIVED FROH OFF-SITE
AMOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
- ^
(4) EPA ID NUMBER: AZ000a398786
(5) TYPE: G. T. S ,,, QUARTERLY REPORT ANNUAL REPORT (6) OUARTER: 2 YEAR: 81 YEAR:
(10) INTRASTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
At OUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
UN/N/ UMBEf
1
DESTINATION
(11) INTERSTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AMOUNT
42,000P .
-0-
-0-
•
UN/NA NUMBER
NA 9189
DESTINATION ! BKK Landfill CAD067786749 221 S. Azusa WeSfCoVtna,'CA i Transported by Overley's Inc.
,
i 1
!
1 i
m ^
r/ w
f 4-13-82 Date Signature
JASTE TYPE [con't fron 1 reverse)
•
EPA #
^ '
F005
FOOl
,
^ w
.
(12) IN STORAGE ON-SITE AT END OF REPORTING PERIOD
AMOUNT
5,000p
18,040p
lO.BOOp
METHOD
S02
SOl
SOl
(13) TOTAL TREATED ON-SITE
AHOUNT .METHOD
-0-
-0-
-0-
.
r
(14) TOTAL DISCHARGE} (15) TOTAL DISPOSED' TO SEWER OR WATEW ON-SITE OF THE U.S.
AMOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
METHOC AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
METHOD
• ENVIRONMENTAL-COORDINATOR
Title
(16) TOTAL RECYCLED OFF-SITE
AMOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
DESTINATION
*
vU\Z:^h[Ci .-;;• • ^ f c / V ^ O i-ACILITY QUAKTLKL i:tru.w m ( 1 ) FACILITY NAME: GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION
( 2 ) LOCATION: 101 S. LITCHFIELD RD. , LITCHFIELD PARK, AZ
( 3 ) COUNTY: MARICOPA
( 7 ) WASTE TYPE
mmiW«' CHROMIUM SLUDGE
FLAMMABLE SOLVENTS
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS
.
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTENO
D007
F005
FOOl
i
.
( 8 ) GENERATED ON-SITE
AMOUNT
43 ,000p
8,O0Op
2 .500p
•
;9)RECEIVED FROH OFF-SITE
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
•
( 4 ) EPA ID NUMBER:
( 5 ) TYPE: 6 , T . S
, ^ , QUARTERLY REPORT l ^J QUARTER: 3 YEAR:
(10 ) INTRASTATE HAZAROOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
mm NUMBEf
• 1 1
DESTINATION
AZ0008398786
ANNUAL REPORT 81 YEAR:
.
( 1 1 ) INTERSTATE HAZAROOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AMOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
i
UN/NA NUHBER DESTINATION
-
y^inyi : L \ ^ ^ .
4-13-82 ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
Date Signature Title
i
WASTE TYPE (con't fror reverse)
EPA «
% D007-
F005
FOOl
®
(12) IN STORAGE ON-SITE AT END OF REPORTING PERIOD
AMOUNT
48,000p
26,040p
13.300p
METHOD
S02
SOl
S02
(13) TOTAL TREATED ON-SITE
AHOUNT .METHOD
-0-
-0-
-0-
1
(14) TOTAL DISCHARGE^ TO SEWER OR WATER OF THE U.S.
AMOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
HETHOD
(15) TOTAL DISPOSED ON-SITE
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
METHOD
(16) TOTAL RECYCLED OFF-SITE i
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
i
DESTINATION
s i
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
o L U L i ^ H i J t \ n i . I ..u.t. i . : • ' • U ^ r • • " • • . • - . -^ ^ i j
(1) FACILITY NAME: GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION
(2) LOCATION: 101 S. LITCHFIELD RD., LITCHFIELD PARK. AZ
(3) COUNTY: MARICOPA
(7) WASTE TYPE
mm^'" CHROHIUH SLUDGE
FLAMMABLE SOLVENTS
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTENO
D007
F005
FOOl
BKK LANDFIL l:AUUu//oU/4 221 S. AZUS WEST COVINA TO MiiT>nr>Trn IKAnarUKlLU DISPOSAL CO
I
1
(8) GENERATED ON-SITE
AMOUNT
120,000p
6,400p
2,900p
1
>
, CA 91791 UY Cll Lni C H L , INC.
[9)RECEIVE0 FROM OFF-SITE
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
•
**
RINCHEM C( n ( \ n f 1 r-C U L J. IJ
PHOENIX, / ADZ049314: TDA^lTionTi' IKrtllDrUltTt
(4) EPA ID NUHBER: AZD008398786
(5) TYPE: 6, T, S ,^. QUARTERLY REPORT ANNUAL REPORT to) QUARTER: 4 YEAR: RI YEAR:
(10) INTRASTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPHENTS
Ah'iOUNT
0-
• 440p
5,400p
HPANY INC. II miriiiir II AVLNUL Z 85007 70 O-fiYHW^eHE
:
UN/N/ ^UMBEf
NA 1142
UN 2831
\
DESTINATION
•
Rinchem**
Rinchem**
(11) INTERSTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AMOUNT
84.000P
42,000p
IT CORPORATIC i - IMPERIAL
UN/NA NUHBER
NA 9189
NA 9189
VALLEY • tAU UUbJJIo4 P. 0. BOX 158 WESTMORELAND, CA 92281
—T^tANSfeRT[D DY CH£MT-Bi^f(jSAfc-ii<(
DESTINATION
BKK*
*** IT
•
i 1
JTE: WASTE TREATMENT IN ITEH 13 IS TO PREPARE WASTE FOR OFF-SITE DISPOSAL.
4-13-82 ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
Date Signature Title
i
M
m i E TYPE (con't fror reverse)
EPA §
c F005
FOOl
—4 l f i k #
(12) IN STORAGE ON-SITE AT END OF REPORTING PERIOD
AMOUNT
42,000p
32,000p
lO.SOOp
METHOD
S02
SOl
SOl
(13) TOTAL TREATED ON-SITE
AHOUNT .METHOD
84,000p
-0-
-0-
•
t
TOl
*
(14) TOTAL DISCHARGE^ (15) TOTAL DISPOSED' TO SEWER OR WATErf ON-SITE OF THE U.S.
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
HETHOD. AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
METHOD
(16) TOTAL RECYCLED OFF-SITE
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
5.400p
DESTINATION
RINCHEM CO. INC. ?n? <;. i«;th Aupmip
Phoenix, AZ AZD049314370 TransportpH hy Rir,.
t
(1) FACILITY NAME: GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION (4) EPA ID NUMBER: AZD008398786
(2) LOCATION: 101 S. LITCHFIELD RD.. LITCHFIELD PARK. AZ (5) TYPE: 6, T. S
(3) COUNTY: MARICOPA ,^. QUARTERLY REPORT t^/ QUARTER: 1 YEAR; 82
ANNUAL REPORT YEAR:
( 7 ) WASTE TYPE
mmiW'"' EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE NOi
(8) GENERATED ON-SITE
AMOUNT
9)RECEIVED FROM OFF-SITE
AHOUNT
(10) INTRASTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AHOUNT UN/N/ JUHBEf DESTINATION
(11) INTERSTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AMOUNT UN/NA NUMBER DESTINATION
CHROMIUM SLUDGE D007 40,000p -0- -0- 42,000p NA
9189 BKK*
FLAMMABLE SOLVENTS F005 10,400p -0- -0- 31,200p
UN 1993 Kettleman H i l l s * *
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS FOOl 400p
2,500p UN
2831 Kettleman H l l l s * ^
** KETTLEMAN XAT0006461
HILLS LANDFILI J
BKK LANDFI XM106ZiafiI la-
P. 0. Box Coalinga, (A i r te< •ditspor D i sposa l Ir
104 93210
fay-Chem;-c.
221 S. Azu West Covi
^Fransportef t ni
a . CA 91791
(IhemicaT Disposa: Co. Inc .
:: »'iy #
1 £.
I
4-15-82 ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
Date Signature Title
WASTE TYPE ( c o n ' t fron reverse)
EPA «
D007 •
F002
FOOl
^
(12) IN STORAGE ON-SITE AT END OF
REPORTING PERIOD
AMOUNT
40 ,000p
l l , 2 0 0 p
9 ,000p
METHOO
S02
SOl
SOl
( 13 ) TOTAL TREATED ON-SITE
AMOUNT .METHOD
-0-
-0-
-0-
.
( 14 ) T O T A L D I S C H A R G E 4 ( 1 5 ) TOTAL DISPOSED TO SEWER OR HATEK ON-SITE OF THE U.S. I
AMOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
METHOD AMOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
LiLETHOD
( 1 6 ) TOTAL RECYCLED OFF-SITE
AHOUNT
-0-
-0-
-0-
DESTINATION
- ^ m m (1) FACILITY NAME: GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION
(2) LOCATION: 101 S. LITCHFIELD RD., LITCHFIELD PARK, AZ
(3) COUNTY: MARICOPA
(7) WASTE TYPE
^Mxx\r" @ ) CHROMIUM
SLUDGE
FLAMMABLE SOLVENTS
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS
^. **BKK LANDFILL m i CAD067786749
.. .22-1—S-. Azusa West Covina, Transported 1
EPA HAZARDOUS WASTENO
0007
F005 •
FOOl
CA 91791 y Chemical
1
(8) GENERATED ON-SITE
AMOUNT
16,200P
9.200P
9,000P
•
lisposal Co.
[9)RECEIVED FROM OFF-SITE
AMOUNT
0
0
0
••
nc. •
(4) EPA ID NUHBER: AZD008398786
- • ^ - -
(5) TYPE: 6, T, S
,,, QUARTERLY REPORT ANNUAL REPORT (6) OUARTER: 2 YEAR: 1982 YEAR:
(10) INTRASTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AHOUNT
0
n,2oop
9,600P
.
•CHEMICAL W AZT0500101
Phoenix, A Transporte
UN/N; JUHBEF
UN 1993
UN 2831
-
•
DESTINATION
CHEMICAL* WASTE MANAGEMENT CHEMICAL* WASTE MANAGEMENT
-
\STE IIANAGEHENT 50
'izoni 1 by ( hemical Dispos£
'
(11) INTERSTATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHIPMENTS
AHOUNT
37.200P :
0
0
•
I Co. Inc.
•
f t f
UN/NA NUMBER
NA 9189
•
DESTINATION
BKK**
- •
of 2
.M l-.! . I . I I M K UIMNIIUI » / r t ^ ^ ^ ^ l S i l »-UI t i I I V I l l l l i l ^ I l -UI V K I - K I I K I
J u l y 19. 1982
Oate
ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
Signature Title
WASTE TYPE ( c o n ' t f ror reverse)
EPA §
D0O7
F005
FOOl
r
(12) IN STORAGE ON-SITE AT END OF
REPORTING PERIOD
AMOUNT
19,O00P
9,200P
8,400P
HETHOD
502
501
501
(13) TOTAL TREATED ON-SITE
AMOUNT .METHOD
0
6
0
• .
-
-
.- -
(14) TOTAL OISCHARGEI TO SEWER OR WATER OF THE U.S.
AHOUNT
0
0
0 -•
X
,
•
•
METHOI
(15) TOTAL DISPOSED ON-SITE
! AMOUNT
0
• 0
0
METHOD
(16) TOTAL RECYCLED OFF-SITE
AMOUNT
0
0
0
DESTINATION
.. -'.r.:
: -
•
QUESTION 6:
Locations and detailed description of all monitoring wells, supply wells, and injection wells at your facility.
ANSWER:
There are no injection wells for hazardous waste or monitoring wells at this facility. To our knowledge there never have been.
A drawing of well locations and descriptions of the wells are attached (Appendix II).
QUESTION 7:
All analyses from sampling of monitoring and supply wells at your facility.
ANSWER:
Table III summarizes the test results for all trichloroethylene samples taken on the wells at this facility. Copies of the laboratory reports for these samples and all other known well samples are attached (Appendix III),
QUESTION 8:
Any information regarding use and disposal of chlorinated solvents by any person or business in the vicinity of Litchfield Airport.
ANSWER:
We have no factual or actual information of the use or disposal of chlorinated solvents in this area by other persons or businesses. The information concerning the use of chlorinated solvents as a degreasing agent by local airfields was presented in newspaper articles by health authorities.
QUESTION 9:
Length of time your company has been at the present location and any information regarding former occupants of your present location and their hazardous waste practices.
ANSWER:
Construction of the facilities at this location was started in the summer of 1941. Operations began January of 1942 and continued until early 1946
and continued until early 1946 at which time the plant was shut down. During this period the facilities were owned by the U. S. Government and were operated by Goodyear Aircraft Corporation (currently Goodyear Aerospace Corporation). The plant was owned by the War Assets Administration from early 1946 until January 1949, when it was purchased by Goodyear Aircraft Corporation. The plant was reopened in February of 1949 and has been in continuous operation since.
APPENDIX C
CHROME SLUDGE DRYING BEDS INFORMATION
# G O O D Y E A R AEROSPACE C O R P O R A T I O N
A R I Z O N A D I V I S I O N
LITCHFIELD PARK, ARIZONA 85340
August 31, 1983
Ms. Suzanne Chaewsky R E C E I V E D Ecology and Environment, Inc. Qr-r, n tnr.-i Suite 640 ^-' "" '"' ' 120 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105 p-c r-, r-,.-..-
Dear Ms. Chaewsky:
Attached is a copy of the analysis you requested on your visit to this facility August 18, 1983. The sample was taken at sample point 001 as a resample for the analyses done for the 1981 NPDES permit application for this facility.
Also attached is a copy sent to the Arizona.Dept. of Health Services at the time our evaporating pits were cleaned up. Sketches of the pits are included with the letter. As I remember, all of the pits were about three-feet deep before cleanout. The large southwest pit had abou^ six-inches of material removed, and the Building 5 pits had about three-feet of material removed.
Sincerely,
Phillips, Manager Plant Engineering
Enc.
ch
cc: Sandra Eberhardt ADHS
H H
G O O D Y E A R AEROSPACE C O R P O R A T I O N
A R I Z O N A D I V I S I O N
LITCHFIELD PARK. ARIZONA 83340
February 23, 1981
Mr. Norm Gumenic • Arizona Department of Health Services State Health Building' 1740 W. Adams Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Subject: Waste Cleanup
Dear Mr. Gumenic:
Enclosed are copies of the analyses and photographs you requested on your visit to this facility.
The laboratory report dated October 27 is for samples taken before the pits were cleaned up. Sample "A" is from the two small pits next to Building 5 and sample "B" is from the large pit in the southwest corner of the plant. These samples are composites of about twenty grab samples taken from the pits. The results shown are for the total concentration of the metals in the samples, not the EP extractable metals.
The other reports are results of samples taken after cleanup. The samples were taken according to ASTM Dl452-65 and in the patterns shown on the attached sketches.
On all pit samples the soil frcm each hole was screened and mixed, equal weights of soil from each hole were added to a composite which was analyzed according to EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR Part 260, Appendix II.
Very truly yours.
)s. Manager ;ring
ch
Enc.
Arizona Tcstin/L^ I laboratories 817 West M.idison • Phonnix, Arizoii. i HSOO; Ti;liiplione '^54-6181
Goodyear Aerospace Corp. For: 'Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340
ATTN: Mr. Tom llcim Plant Engineeriiu)
Date: October 27, 1980
Liil). No.: n4 36
Sample: Soil Marked: 99052-M.
Receiveil: 10/21/80
Submitted by: Randy Clark
REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS
Sample Marked : A_
Chromi um (Total ) Chromium VI Cadmi um Free Cyanide as CN,
water extractable Arseni c Nickel Zinc Copper Si 1ver Lead Mercury
23,000 ppm 10
230.
*lt 1 2.0
370 500. 380.
*1t 0.2 2000.
0.5 2
B
52,000 340 70
*1t
ppm
*1 t
1 1 .9
220 350. 920.
2.3 580. O.m
It less than
Respocl fully si ihn ii l l (id,
ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORIES
/
Steven Hankins
Arizona Testing liaboratories 817 West Madison • Phoenix, Arizona 85007 • Telephone 254-6181
For: 'Goodyear Aerospace Corp. Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340
Attn: Mr. Tom Heim Plant Engineering
Sample: S o i l
Received: 1 2 - 1 1 - 8 0
Submitted by: , same
Date: December 31, 1980
Lab. No.: 9276
Marked: Your P.O. No. 99052-M
Sample marked
REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS
SW Pit, 12/11/80
*EPA EP Extractable
Total Chromium:
Hexavalent Chromium:
Lead:
Cadmium:
. 0.057 mg/l
It* 0.01 mg/l
It* 0.02
0.31
It* = less than
*Note: Concentrations are in mg/l from soil extraction
according to EPA Extraction Procedure.
Respectfully submitted,
ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORIES
Steven Hankins
Arizona Testing Laboratories 817 West Madison • Phoenix, Arizona 85007 • Telephone 254-6181
For:' Goodyear Aerospace Corp. Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340
Attn: Mr. Tom Heim Plant Engineering
Date: January 8, 1981
Lab. No.: 9307
Sample: Soil
Received: December 17, 1980
Submitted by: same
REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS
Marked: Your P. 0 . No. 99052-M
Sample:
EPA EP Extractable:
Total Chromium: ^ '^
Hexavalent Chromium: ll**C.01
Lead: It* 0.02
Cadmium: 0.026'
mg/L
It* = less than
Note: Concentrations are in mg/L from soil extractions
according to EPA extraction procedure.
Respectfully submit,:ed,
ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORIES
Steven Hann 'ns
Arizona Testing Laboratories 817 West Madison • Phoenix, Arizona 85007 • Telephone 254-6181
For: Goodyear Aerospace Corp. Litchfield Park, Arizona 95340
ATTN: Mr. Randy Clark
Date: January 29, 1981
Lab. No.: 9593
Sample: Soil
Received: 1/15/81
Submitted by: Same
Marked: Your Purchase Order #15492-M
REPORT OF LABORATORY TESTS
*EPA-EP Extraction: #5E
Lead
Cadmium
Total Chromium
Hexavalent Chromium
0.07 mg/L
0.55
0.15
*lt 0.02
*Note: Concentrations are in mg/L from soil extraction
according to EPA Extraction Procedure.
Respectfully submitted,
ARIZONA TESTING LABORATORIES
*1t = less than Steven Hankins
imtemauammmi
B V d o j r S ^ ^ t s ^(\Y^^)tC>rU I f - 1 ^ - 9 0
izo'
\Z DEEP
S0\i\O ROCK?
SOU\53 ROCK AT B'DE^^
5
15'
'-
15
15
15
5
^
Sca i iWe i^ i P H S^K../.le| Gnct; \i^]D''SO
\
G "0 )(\) 'r\e_r ^ ]Z l^te.}o sampled w\\k V\((yic{
V
#
APPENDIX D
GOODYEAR AEROSPACE CORPORATION
1981 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION
nm d lo^ fe(Ei€)#rB^^*^3.n:'a&IE]iiiia^©r ©DM^
May 14, 1981
Pennits Branch, E-4-2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 215 Fremont Street San Francisco, Califomia 94105
Pennits Unit Bureau of Water Quality Control Arizona Department of Health Services
1740 West Adams Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Re: Goodyear - .Aerospace - Litchfield Park., Arizona NPDES Permit Application No. AZ0000108
Dear Sirs
Enclosed is our completed Consolidated Permit Application covering our request for a NPDES perrait to discharge to waters of the United Scates.
Please advise should there be cny questions conceming this request for a NPDES permit.
Very truly yours
E J Burkett, Manager Environmental Engineering
jle
Please print or type in the unshaded area: • f . ' i l l - in arpj i are spaced for elite rv'DP. i.t charactsn/inchj.
F O J N M
GENERAL .
U.S. E N V I R O N M E N T A U P R O T E C T I O N A G E N C Y
GENERAL INFORMATION Consolidated Permitt Program
Form Approved OMB No. ISS-ROJ 75
I. EPA I.D. NUMBER : . .:. ' ZZ.-:-^'Z:r^'-Z-:^Z-kii I r I _ I _ I
A Z D 0 0 8 3 9 3 7 8 6f
K - s — X — X — X — X \ s i l l , F A C I L I T Y N A M E ^ : x — X \ • • •
\ \ \ \ \ A I.D. N U M B E R
N \ \ \
VXN F A C I L I T Y
• M A I L I N G A D D R E S S ,
\ \ \ \ \
nZDu 0 9:5?;5.'^36
GGODrE.-iR rjERUiSFnCE CORFuRnTIQH FQ EQ^^ a s LITCHFIELD FK. nZ S534U
I'jl S LITCHFIELD RD LITCHFIELD PK. nZ 35:340
C E N C R A U I N S T R U C T I O N S
I a preprinted label hai been provided, aff ix ( In tho designated spaca. Review the in form-l ion carefully; if any of it is incorrect, crosi (Srough it and enter the correct data in the ppropriate fill—in area belovv. .Also, if any of he preprinted data is absent (the area ro Cne f f t o f tho label space lists tfte information [lar should appeari, please provide it in the roper fill—in aresfst below, tf the label is bmplete and correct, you need not compl eta \ems I, I I I , V, and VI (except VI-3 which }ust be completed regardless). Complete all ems if no label has bsen provided. Refer tu »e instructions for detailed item descrip-ont and for the legal authorizations under ihich this data is coiiected.
11. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
IWiSTRUCTlONS: Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. If you ans'.ver "ves" to any questions, you must submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question. Mark " X " in the bos in the third column if the supplemental form is attsched. If you answer "no" to each question, you need not submit any of these forms. You may answer " n o ' if your activiry is excluded from permit requirements; see Section C of the instructions. See also. Section 0 of the instructions for definitions of boid-fecsd terms.
S P E C I F I C Q U E S T I O N S .A A f> K • X '
S P C C I I r i C Q U E S T I O N S M A R K -X
A. Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works vvhich results in a discharge to waters of tha U.S.7 ( F 0 R M 2 A )
Does or wi l l this facil ity (either existing ar proposed) include a concentrated animal feeding op«fstion or aquatic animal production facil i ty which results in a discharga to waters of tha U.S.? (FORM 2B)
C. Is this a facility wnich currently results in discharges to waters of tha U.S. other than those described In A or B above;> (FORM 2C)
D. Is this a proposed facility (other than those described in A or B above) which wil l result in a dischkrgs to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2D)
E. Ooes or wi l l this facility treat, store, or dispose of hazardout wastes? (FORM 3)
Oo you or wi l l you inject at this facil i ty Industrial or municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum containing, wi th in one quarter mile of the well bore, underground sources of drinking water? (FOFIM 4)
Do you or wi l l you iniect at this facility any produced .water or other fluids which are brought to the surface in conn»ction witN conventional oil or natural gas production, .inii^c: *luid3 used for enhanced recovery of oil or natural gds, or inject fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbons? (FORM 4)
H. Do you or wi l l you inject at this facil ity fluids for special processes such as mining of sulfur by ths Fraseh process, solution mining of minerals, in situ combustion of fossil fuel , or recovery of goothsrmal energy? (FORMA)
X
~n \s this facility a proposed stationary source wmcn is one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the instructions and which wil l potentially emit 100 tons per year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect or be located in an attainment area? (FORM 5)
J. Is,this facility a proposed stationary sourca wnic.i fi NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed In the instructions and which wil l potentially emit 250 tons per year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect or be located in an attainment area? (FORM 5)
l i l . I I I I ! 1 ! 1 i I i I i . 1 I ! 1 1 1 1 I I i i i I i 1 I I I i 1 i ! I . 1 I
'Mii . i ir .Mi^i^^at
J IV. FACI LITY CONTACT ^,^.;^:,^,x^;.;^;r:^.^:; , . . fc,^jva;^iaava=:;;,{a^^ t» 1« . I . I lg
A . N A M E ac T I T L E (lo»t, f i rs t , Sc t i t le )
T — I — \ — I — I — I — r — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — \ — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — ; — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — r
L.E .O.N. A, R. D, L A D E N . .P .L .A .N .T . M A N A G E R . .
S. P H O N E (area code £i no . )
T — r
6 . 0 . 2
V. FACILITY MAILING AOORESS " ^ T ^ m ^ ^ ^ L ^ A . S T R E E T O R P.O. B O X
"i I I I—I—1—I—I—I—r~~ i I I I I I I I I 1 I I r ~ i I r
— I — I —
9 . 3 . ? 7. n. 1.7
itlOJeSi
KPA Form 3510-1 (6-30) CONTINUE ON R E V r i f l i :
^ C O N T I N U E D - O ' ' - , ^ . . - ^ y . i iT j»;.L't<L.j;;,y,.»!VTJ^,wj.'ivfflw,i^7fl;^ i.;yJiB;^M;.By'J;y^^".V--,\W''.^7'fflj^^^^ V l l . S IC C O D E S (4-d ig i t . i n o r d e r o f p r i o r i t Y l _ . ^ , ^ : ^ ^ ^ > f ? s £ Z ^ ^ i l Z i i i J M Z K Z Z Z Z Q ^
— 1 — I 1
3 6 6 2 I I — I —
Radar Manufacture
1 C. T H I R D
B. SECONO
3. 7, 2,8 (specify)
Aircraft Parts & Equipment
D. P O U R T H
7 "T—r T — I — r —
7 .6 ;9 (specify)
Guided Missile T r a n s p o r t e r (specify)
V l l l . O P E R A T O R I N F O R M A T I O N ^ . , . . . . . , ; ; : i i : , ^ a l j a f e r i ^ g i a ^ i i g ; t e ^ ^ ^
1 — \ — I — I — 1 — I — I — I — 1 — r A. N A M E
T 1 I 1 r 1 I 1 r T — r — T — I — 1 — r I l i i l i
G O O D Y E A R A E R O S P A C E C O R P O R A T I O N ' • 1 . . t . . .
3 . Is The nama l i r :ec i -I t o m V l l l-A elK> t.-w. owna r?
S YES • NO S6
C. STATUS OF OPERATOR (Enter the appropr ia te le t ter into the ansiver box : if "Other" , specify.) O. PHONE (area code ic no.)
T T I i T
7 0 0 0 ! F - F E D E R A L S - S T A T E P = P R I V A T E
M = PUBLIC (other than federal or state) O " OTHER (apeeify)
(specify)
P r i v a t e 6 0 2 i« - I f
i I
9 3 2 «« - 11
i E. S T R E E T O H P.O. D O X T — I — I — I — \ — I — I — I — I — I — I — T
P O B O X . 8 5 . . . . - j — I — I — I — r — i — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — r
^ F. C I T V O R T O W N . G . S T A T E M. Z I P C O D E I X . I N D I A N
— I — 1 — I — r — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — ! — I — I — I — \ — p — T — I — I — I — I — r
L I T C H F I E L D P A R K -I I I . I I • I . 1
AZ r i l I I
8 5 3 4 0 Is t he f a c i l i t y l oca ted o n Ino ian ianos?
• YES > S NO
X E X I S T I N G E N V I R O N M E N T A L P E R M I T s ' ^ ' ' ' " " ^ - ' ^ . — ^ ^ ^ ' ' ^ ' ^ • " i ! ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' ^ - - " ^ ^ ^ X . E X I S T I N G S N V I H U N I V I b N T A L P fcHMI f t . ^ . . ,^. . . -^ ,^ ;^^4; f taB. : . .a^ : : : : . . - . .AA:^ : . fe : i i i ^J iaa ja^o^
A. NPDES (Discharges to Surface Water) 1 — I — I — I — 1 — I — 1 — 1 — I — i — r
A Z 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 I I l l l l I [ I I I I
D. PSD l.\ir Eniissions from Proposed Sources)
T I 1 1 I I ! 1 I 1 1 T
I I u__i L _ J L.
B. UIC (Underground Injection of Fluids) E. OTHEH (specify) - \ — I — I — I — 1 — 1 — I — I — I — I — r - I — I — I — I — r ~ T — I — I — I — I — I — r
U ^ • - h 1 1 * i. • I t III
(specify) 13 Air Permits Issued by Maricopa Co
C. RCRA (Hazardous Wastes) e . OTHER (specify)
- 1 — I — I — I — I — i — I — I — I — I — I — r - 1 — I — I — ! — I — 1 — I — I — I — \ — I — r
«l 1 I •
(specify)
^ • -.t.^'- '••-'~-''--'ir'--y7'^-t^'^^li.ili'-T''''^^---~-'-i--xi,-iiiii-n^ li'iV'''••'-- ^i'1'nrfMi^'l"-''il--.'rlV-"-"i"-irT r'i-'™i''-- '
Attach to. this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property bounderies. The map must s.ncv the outline of the facility, the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous -.vaste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where it injects fiuids underground. Include all springs, rivers and other surface water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements.
X I I . N A T U R E O F B U S I N E S S (p rov ide a b r i e f d e s c r i p t i o n / ^ -'-.. v i : ; 'T . l - ; . .^ ' . . - ' iLv3qr i^^L?!?a: ' - -W' ' ' ^^^ i
Manufacture of Aerospace Products
XIII CBBTiFICATlQN (seeinstructions) '*'^ '-- '• ' ' -- '^ ' '^^^^^^ i X ^ I ^ L £ H T I I ^ I C A T I O N r i g g / W / t / c a o W , ^ ; , . , . . . . u - ^ , a i i . ^ ^ ^ ^ . , l a v ^ . . : , : a , ^ a ^ ; . . . ^ ^ ^ ^ .;
/ certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submined in this application and sii attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those persons immedi.itely responsible for obtaining ths information contained in r.'re application, I believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting falS' information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.
A. N A M E & O F F i c i A u T I T L E ( t y p e Or p r i n t )
I) E Hill, Vice President, Mfg a . S I G N A T U R E
C O M M E N T S F O R O F F I C I A L USE O N T — 1 1—I 1—r
C. O A T E SICINEO
^-, 7V / 8
• * I '
- 1 — I — r
I I 1
. l t - , : i^ . . ' - i i ' i i . - . i . ' -~" ' . - - 'V. t '^^-S^-e-4l^- \ . -<^~.- i - i .^T/ .^-y»i^Ji T I I i 1 I I 1 I 1 i I 1 T \ 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 i i [ -, i 1 ,
l l l l l l .
E P A F o r m 3 5 1 0 - 1 (6-80) R£V!E71SF.
#
X Existing Environmental Permits (continued)
Maricopa County Air Permits
7780 7781 7782 7783 7784 7785 7786 7787 7788 7789 7790 7791 7792
,0. I.'i'.
Welt » v
Writ
. , „ *'C OOWf IL
9»5
BM 98;
"01
« i " i ? • • ; . . • :^^• .7^•• .•• ,•^•;•••
ux-,•»; p«w- •«
, 1 cu..^....
/W-V.'^.ij f f t y p - «'."•.
•^w i'
1 ]••
\B> S:KSiD u^/ | !_-y-p-t l jv .w
WELL
,, 5S0,000QFD
'b.OOp (\P0 YA^D5
S<^^.,500<^PO I9,OOO^PD
BUlLDlWq CCDUMq
Al io HUM SOI TY
COMTROl^
170.000 l .COOCJW MEfALmeATlH^
AHO FlKieHiM*::;
EVAPORATION
q^,ooo<qpo SpOO^'PD
e.OOOiiipD
1 TRe/^TMEKIT
3o,ao<;PD 'SAMPie mHTlCTP"
II I I • ^ B w — • ! • — • I I H j i t [ ' ^ t y • I
u £VAP:?R/iTlOM
FOWERMOU-Se
SOO QPV
3Z^5OOCP0 SAMPLt ?D\HT*O0Z" f63,O0O^Pt)
{»
35;oood;pD
' 090
-SAVJiTARY
1. pAlM WATE(2.-: . . 2 . 0 0 0 ^ p p . . . :
I
CLA WqESieR
'z^hUPi^ ft>lWT o o :
C\\lOZ\ntS\6
SAMPie P^INT 00 \ ' • lOficoc^pD
^
30,5OO<^P0
G O O D Y E A R AEROSPACE CORPORATION
PLANT ENGINEERING ARIZONA DIVISION
RCViSlON NO. I
OATt fiy
RCVISION NO 3
ri.Mr
F L O W
SCAlt M^MS. I f o OAic|Z-g,--77
oepi.
L'R BY P W f b ,
0'//G NO
gM^ET I o.f I
Pl^a'ie print o-.-type in the unshaded arpns only.
EPA I.D. N U M B E H C C O ; J > from i tem 1 of t^orm ^
AZD 008398786 . . I . Form Approved 0 M 8 No. 158-R0173
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAI. PROTCCTlON AGENCV APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
E X I S T I N G M A N U F A C T U R I N G , C O M M E R C I A L , M I N I N G A N D S I L V I C U L T U R A L O f E R A T I O N S C o n s o l i d a t e d Permi t s P r o a r s m
LOCA I IQN ^is:Z.:-Z'-iiiZ:^:^^-i^^^&!&Ai^=ii:^d;^~£'^f^^ '(1 outfal l , list the latitude and longitude of its locotion to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.
AT O U T F A L L N U M O E R
(lis')
B. L A T I T U D E C. LONGITUOE D. RECEIVING WATER (name)
001 33 25 54 112 21 40 Buckeye Canal
002
003
33- 25 36 112 21 38 Buckeye Canal
33 25 34 112 21 38 Buckeye Canal
11. FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION. ANP TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES ^ : ^ ^ : M : ^ J m S ^ ! M ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^ M M 1 ^ m ^ S . ^ ^ ^ i > ^ ^ ^ S m . A. Attach a line drawing showing the water f low througn the faci l i ty. Indicate sources of Intake water, operations contributing wastewater to tne effi.jdr;t.
and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing avera5e flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined (e.g., far certain mining activities), provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
B. For each outfa l l , provide.a description of: (1) Al l operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater, cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average f low contributed by each operation; and (31 The treatment received by the virastewater. Continue on additional sheets if necessary.
1 . O U T F A L L N O
(list)
2. O f E R A T t O N ( S | C O N T R I B U T I N G F L O W 3. T R E A T M E N T
a. OPERATION (list) b. A V E R A G E F L O W
(include units) a. DESCRIPTION b. L I S T C O O E S F R O M
T A B L E ZC- I
Non-Contact Process Cooling 35.000 GPD None
Building Cooling & Humidity 32.500 GPD Nons
001 Rain Water 2,000 GPD •None
Boiler Blowdoii'm 500 GPD None
^J^^-rnn^af-^ p- r r^raf t ronl ipg 37.nnn GPV\ None Building Cooling & Humidity 196,000 GPD None
002 Rain Water 30,000 GPD None
Metal Treat Rinse 6.000 GPD Acidification and Chrome Reduction Sections 2L Neutralization Section 2C
Separator Tank IG IU
Centrifuge 5D
Filter 5R
Discharge 4A
Domestic Sewage 46,500 Comminutor IL 003 Imhoff Type Clarigester •3A 5A
Chlorine 2F
Sludge Bed
OFFICIAL U S t ONLY (effluent i-uidelines tub-cateioriec)
5H
EPA Form 35'.0-2C IG-SOI P A G F 1 O F d CONTINUE O.N R £ V ; . - i ;
CONTINUED FROM THE TRONT C. Except for storm runoff, leak:, or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items II-A or B intermittent or seasonal?
Q YES (complete the fol lowing lable) ^ i N O (go to Section I I I )
T F A L L M B E R
(list)
2. O P E R A T I O N i ' ^ J C O N T R I B U T I N G F L O W
(list)
3. FREQUENCY
». D A Y S PER W E E K
(specify average)
b. M O N T H S PER Y E A H
(specify average)
4. F L O W
F L O W R A T E
(in mgd) I . UOMa TCRM
AVePWAOK 1. MA;^IMUfr
OAILV
b. T O T A L V O L U M E
(specify witli units} , LONO TERK
A V K R A C E X. M AXIMUM
OAIUV
C DURATION
(in dayt)
N.A.
I I I . MAXIMUM PRODUCTION 'i*iiV<fi'm'ji-\-'>''r'--'\if^.'r'^''i^'^'^''^i-n'iif^^^^
A. Does an effluent guideline l imitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your facility? [ ^ y c s (complete Item ni -B) ^ > i * o (to to Section IV)
S. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure o f operation)?
• Y E S fcompJefe/fern m-C; \~^t iO (go to Section IV)
C. If you answered "Yes" to Item II I -B, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your maximum level of production, expressed in the terms and units used in the applicable effluent guideline, and Indicate the affected outfalls.
I . M A X I M U M Q U A N T I T Y
a , Q U A N T I T Y P e n O A V C . O R C N A T f O N , PROOUCT, M A T C R I A I . . K T C .
(specify)
a. A F F E C T E D O U T F A L L S
(list outfali numbers)
li'iiffiM'r^Wtir'^-ift-i.'-ifc ^i - - - . , ^ ,
A. Are you now required by any Federa), State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of vvasr?-water treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This inclucss, but is not l imited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and gra.-.* or loan conditions. Q ' ^ E S (compute the following table) X^NO (go (o Item IV-Bi
1 . I D E N T I F I C A T I O N O F C O N O I T I O N , A G R E E M E N T , E T C .
NA
i
2. A F F E C T E D O U T F A L L S
a. NO. t x a o u n c a O F D iscHAnas S. B R I E F D E S C R I P T I O N O F P R O J E C T
«. F I N A L C r M -P L I A N C E C A T S
a. ne- t l »po-o u i r e o J c c T . o
' T IONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmrntui pro/sc:s which moy sf''^ ur discharges! you now have underway or which you ptan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actuj i l n n f * r i crHi ' i r l t i f jac * n . - r<<-.n<-i .>..^r;n. r—i
B. OPTI Your dischargesi you now djve underway _. , ,.._ ^ .. , ,. , , puinncd scheaules (or construction. Q ^ , ^ „ K " X - I F OEScniPTiON O F A D O I T I O . ^ I A L C O N T R O L P R O G R A M S I S ^ A T T A C H E D
CPA Form 3510-2C (G 80) P A G E 2 OF 4 CQiMTI,%Ui; Ui'i
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2
i> A I . O . NUMUERfcopy from Item I of Form I)
AZD 008398786 Form Approved OMB No. 158-H0173
A , ^ &
v . INTAKE A N D EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS ii...i.i.u<v>.^ii»iiii;yrti,!iyi«j|jt^w^^i,MlWiJ|J>IW^y.ij^^ ^<<^•••:•..;.•-l:'.>..^•..^\>.it.vJ/»;-.^^«J.>'.^-r..5i•>^^..•^^!;».^-r•-..<w-..>•/^.yrt-^,^,.;-^^
A, B, & C: See instructions before proceeding — Complete one set of tables for each outfall — Annotate the outfal l number in the space provided. NOTE; Tables V-A, V-B, and V-C are included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-9.
se the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may bc discharged from any outfal l . For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your possession.
I. P O L L U T A N T Z. S O U R C E I . P O L L U T A N T 2. S O U R C E
NA
v. . POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BV ANALYSIS ^ m ^ ^ f ^ S ^ m m ^ m m ^ ^ ^ m M m m : ^ ^ ^ ^ ^j; t t4 nuji.»J5.«i. I
A. Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you do or expect that you wil l over the next 5 years use or manuractu.' as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?
t :S3 ' ' ' 'ES '^"" " " ' ^ " ^ pol lu tan ts below) • N O Cro to I tem VLB)
rsenic Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Silver Zinc
Cyanide Methylene Chloride Toluene 1.1.1 Trichloroethane. 1.1.2 Trichloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane
Phenol Isophorone
B. Are your cperat the next 5 years
ions such that your raw materials, processes, or products can reasonably be expected to vary so that your discharges of pol lutarts may Curir exceed two times the maximum values reported in Item V7
• Y E S leompletc I tem VI-C below) Jf^^T^o reo fo Section VII)
C. If you answered "Yes " to Item Vl -B, explain below and describe in detail the sources and expected levels of such pollutants which you anticipate wil l Se discharged from each outfal l over the next 5 years, to the best of your ability at this time. Continue on additional sheets if you need more space.
NA
#
EPA Form 3510-2C (6-30) P A G E 3 OF 4 CONTINUE CM '•:;
ONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
/U^IOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING OATA ^ g V g ^ S ^ l ^ l r ^ - ^ ^ H J ^ i a ^ P t S a l ^ ^ Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acuta or chronic toxici ty has been made on any of your cischarges or on a receiving water in relation to your discharge wi th in the last 3 years? recciwng V
I I Y E S (Identify the test(s) and describe their purpotet below) ^ Q N O (go to Section VUI)
NA
y of the analyses reported in. I tem V pe r f o rmed i y a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
• "-""^ -~ • Y E S f''«' fhenome, address, and telephone number af. and pohutants analyzed by, each such laboratory or firm below)
• N O ffo to Secfion IX)
A. NAME
Arizona Testing Lab
Envirodyne Engineers, Inc
B. AOORESS
817 W Madison Phoenix, Arizona 85007
12161 Lackland Road St Louis, Mo 63141
C. TELEII-HONE (area code di no.)
(602)254-6181
.
(314) 434-6960
a: POLLUTANTS ANALYZERS • l-.'llf)
Part A & B except TOC, Chlorine, and Total Organic Nitrogen. Also did 002 Chromium and Cadmium
Part C and TOC and Total Organic Nitrogen
/ certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and sii attachments and that, based an my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that The in-formation is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including t n " ^ ^ ^ l i i t y of fine and imprisonment.
FAME & OFFICIAL T ITLE (type or print)
D E Hill, Vice President, Mfg
C. S I G N A T U R E
I J ^ CkLj.L
a. PHONE NO. (area code <& no.j
(216) 796-2121
D. D A T E S I G N E D
'/f /f/
Item IIB (cont'd)
Unit Size
Acidification & Chrome Reduction 600 gal
Neutralization 300 gal
Separator 2,100 gal
Flow Rate
30 gpm
30 gpm
30 gpm
Retention Time
20 min
10 min
70 min
Waste Disposal
Centrifuge
Filter
Discharge
30 gal
Comminutor
Clarigester 21,000 gal
SJudge .Be.d 21,0.00 gal_
8 gpm
30 gpm
30 gpm
32 gpm (ave)
32 gpm (ave) II hr (ave)
..10,000 gal/yr
Trucked To Waste Disposal Facility (1000 gal/month)
Dried sludge trucked to disposal facility (3000 lb/yea:
APPENDIX E
OUTFALL 001 ANALYSIS
GOODYEAR AEROSPACE C O R P O R A T I O N
A R I Z O N A D I V I S I O N LITCMFIELO PARK, ARIZONA 83340
August 31, 1983
Ms. Suzanne Chaewsky Ecology and Environment, Inc.
RECEIVED
SEP -61983-Suite 640 120 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105 fV-?'n nnc' co
Dear Ms. Chaewsky:
Attached is a copy of the analysis you requested on your visit to this facility August 18, 1983. The sample was taken at sample point 001 as a resample for the analyses done for the 1981 NPDES permit application for this facility.
Also attached is a copy sent to the Arizona Dept. of Health Services at the time our evaporating pits were cleaned up. Sketches of the pits are included with the letter. As I remember, all of the pits were about three-feet deep before cleanout. The large southwest pit had abou^ six-inches of material removed, and the Building 5 pits had about three-feet of material removed.
Sincerely,
P h i l l i p s , Manager Plant Engineering
Enc.
ch
cc: Sandra Eberhardt ADHS
tNGINt tRS TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. W I «M ff.n^fhhiv lto«d PO Boi 21387 Phn^nu. Arizona S5036 T»l I03 JM I M l
433 Snulh OU^r Avf.fnM TiKMm. Amona 857H
T»l K)l-bH-W9*
lAOri 1 a\t Hunlinfion Dm riai^ iaf l . i n f a n t MiflOl T»l hPJ 774 (I70II
LABORATORY REPORT
Client Goodyear Aerospace Corporation Arizona Division Post Office Box 85 Litchfield Park, Arizona 85340
J ob No
Lab/Invoice No. 22101967
Date of Report 6 / 2 4 / 8 1
Project
Location
. 1 , 1 , 1 Tr ich loroe thy lene Analysis.
Sampled By Material/Specimen . W a s t e w a t e r .
Source . C l i e n t Submitted By _GAC/Randy_C.l.ar.k.,
Test Procedure Gas_Chr .omatography Authorized By GAC/P,..O..I 27,68.1^E.
RESULTS
. . . Date __ - -
_ D a t e _ 6 / 1 6 / 8 1
. ._Date_6. /16/8I
A s a m p l e of w a s t e w a t e r was r e c e i v e d f o r a n a l y s i s o f 1 , 1 , 1 t r i c h l o r o e t h a n e on 16 J u n e 1 9 8 1 . The s a m p l e was c l e a r w i t h no v i s i b l e s e d i m e n t . An e x t r a c t i o n was p e r f o r m e d w i t h i s o - o c t a n e t o s e p a r a t e any 1 , 1 , 1 t r i c h l o r o e t h a n e frora t h e w a t e r and t h e e x t r a c t was a n a l y z e d by g a s c h r o m a t o g r a p h y . The r e s u l t a a r e l e s t e d b e l o w :
^ ^ C o n c e n t r a t e d ^ M m p l e I d e n t i f i c a t i o n 1 , 1 , 1 T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e , p p b D e t e c t i o n L i m i t , p p b
OOIB 8
^ ^ i e s t o C l i e n t (1) Respectfully submitted,
ENCtNEERS TESTINC LABORATORIES, INC.
Y C r ^ d Tom C a r r , C h e m i s t
APPENDIX F
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC ANALYSES OF ON-SITE WELLS
FROM FIT SAMPLING IN SEPTEMBER 1982
•
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC ANALYSES - FIT SAMPLING ON 9/2/82
Parameter
TASK 1
Aluminum Chromium Barium Beryl 1i um Cadmium** Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Nickel Manganese** Zinc Boron** Vanadium Calcium Magnesium Sod i um
TASK 2
Arsenic Antimony Selenium Thallium Mercury Tin Silver
TASK 3
Ammonia Cyanide Sulfide TOC Fluoride pH
Goodyear #2
mg/l
*
10 100
___ —
___
100
— —
_--
—
—
NA NA NA NA NA NA
Aerospace Company #3
mg/l
— —«
30 — — — — —
50 — — — —
100
—
..
—
NA NA NA NA NA NA
Wells #4
mg/l
• ——
10 200 — — ---—
50 _-.. ---—
30 100 — — — —
... — — —
— <100
40 _«_ —
NA NA NA
•-- = Less than contractual detection limits, nothing detected NA = Not applicable to analysis requested ** = All results for this element not valid
Taken from: Litchfield Airport Study Area Workplan, FIT, March 1983
J ^
CONTINUED F B ^ ^ A G E V-3
1 . P O L L U T A N T
N u M n L r?
2 .
. t L' » T
I l l i i i - a i l i l l i l r ) o ' u ' i n .
M A f T K ' X '
lv i . r -I.II.W 11 r
f r. NT
t o r . -t i l u 1 1
t r. NT
EPA I .D . I
AZ
0. M A X I M U M D A I L Y V A L U E
I ' l C O ' N C i : N r n « T i o N
G C / M S F R A C T I O N - P E S T I C I D E S ( c o n i i n u c d )
17|J. Hco roc l i l o r E Dox ido ( 1 0 2 4 . 5 7 - 3 )
1GP. P C B . 1 2 4 2 ( 5 3 4 6 0 - 2 1 - 9 )
I 9 r . P C 8 - 1 2 5 4 ( 1 1 0 9 7 . 6 9 - 1 )
2DP. P C B - 1 2 2 1 ( 1 1 1 0 4 - 2 8 - 2 )
2 1 F . P C B - 1 2 3 2 ( 1 1 1 4 1 - 1 6 - 5 )
[ - PCB-1248 ( 72-29-6)
23P . P C D - 1 2 6 0 M 1 0 9 S . 8 2 . 5 )
34P. P C B I O i e ( 1 2 6 7 4 - 1 1 - 2 )
2GP. T o x a p h o n o ( 8 0 0 1 - 3 5 - 2 )
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
( ] | M A f I
•
.
^
D 008398786 ^
J . e r r L U E N T
b. M A X I M U M SO O A Y V A L U E ( i f ni- t} iLi : i lc)
M CONC i; NTH ATION
•
| . | - . V ,
k l m I J J O U T ! A L U N U M U E r ^
^ 003
C L O N G TEJ i r / I flVpr;. V A U U E
I ' l C O N C C f « l ' l * TION
I , I • . .HV
'1. N o . o r A N A U -V S f S
^
F o r m A p p r o v e d O M O N o . l C S - R 0 t 7 3
4 . U M I T S
.1. C O N C E M T H A T I O N 1). M A S S
5 . I M T A K F . ( . l l l l l l . i l c l )
/> v r . ' . ".f. 1. \ " \ L U e ( l i e OMCI..N.
TM ATION | > | ~ . . 7
h r j o . o '
V S L S
EPA Form 3510-201(6-80) PAGE v - 9
c I/) b o <
V. H
H
o
n
