Upload
meryl-george
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Simulating the dispersion of rotor-wash entrained dust
J.D. McAlpine
Atms 790 seminar
April 2, 2007
Collaborators:
Dr. D. Koracin
Dr. J. Gillies
Dr. D. Boyle
Introduction
Forecasting Desert Terrain Project
sponsored: Army Research Office
project coordinator: Dr. Eric McDonald
Our Aspect:- Exploring the flow field around a helicopter in ground effect
- What aspects of the flow field contribute the most to dust emission?
- Developing a method to simulate dust entrainment due to the helicopter flow field
- Coupled modeling of various scales mesoscale microscale
Developing a modeling method: outline
Why is helicopter dust emission a significant concern?
Modeling plan outline: - Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)- rotor wake simulation
- Dust entrainment simulation
- Particle modeling simulation
Upcoming Desert Terrain Rotorcraft Experiment- Measurement of helicopter flow features and dust dispersion
Why is dust entrainment a concern?
Regulation: PM emission inventories Clean air act: U.S. base operations Regional Haze Rule
Operation: Training simulation Visibility Equipment damage
Unknowns: flow field and dust source
1. Rotor jet distribution
and impingement
2. Turbulent burst
3. Surface jet
4. Vortex shedding
5. Re-entrainment
of dust
Proposed Modeling Scheme
Computational Fluid Dynamics (FLUENT)
Virtual Blade Model (VBM):
DRI Lagrangian Particle Model
Dust source term
CFD & VBM DRI LPM
Atmospheric simulation scheme
CAD ModelPost-processor:FiltererShear stress
Dust source term
Fluent CFD simulations:
Equations of motion solved over a discretized domain:• Continuity equation• Conservations of momentum• Energy equation• Equation of state• Turbulence parameterization scheme (K-eps, LES…)
initialization iteration solution
21Du pfv u
Dt x
Virtual Blade Model
vs.
Full blade modeling VBM: momentum source
• only time-averaged flow field needed• effects of flow on individual blades irrelevant• VBM: sophisticated technique- heli. specific
Virtual Blade Model: Blade Physics
21
2 LdL U cC dyForce= lift(L) – drag(D):
Blade Element Theory:
21
2 DdD U cC dy
•Lift & drag coefficients (CL and CD): f(angle)•U: function of blade orientation
Virtual Blade Model: in action
Model accounts for:
trimming, twist, chord var., flapping, coning Source evolves with solution: numerically stable Example: static pressure of validation case:
Untrimmed Trimmed
Atmospheric simulation
1st case: steady state neutral atmosphere
Desert Measurement Project Comparisons:- steady state profiles
- unsteady real-time
Final Product: - Coupled mesoscale-LES boundary layer model
Atmospheric simulation: 1st case
o
o
z
zzuzU ln)( *
C
uK
2*
- Neutral atmosphere, k-epsilon turbulence model
1st: validate: - TKE profile - epsilon profile - wind profile
2nd: rotor simulation-Blackhawk heli.
3rd: LPM input-Adapt CFD results-Ensure same atmos.conditions
INPUTS:
-surface roughness-wind profile:
-TKE profile and source term:
-epsilon profile:
)()(
3*
ozz
uz
Results: in progress
1st case:-Light winds-Blackhawk dimensions
Current work:-Simplified BlackhawkGeometry-Proper rotor variables -Validation of pressureDistribution-TKE, wind dist. validation
Dust Source Term
Physics of particle entrainment:
Shear Stress:u
Kz
Aerodynamic Lift: -determined from shear stress, velocity -overcome sliding friction 1st
-overcome gravity next
Dust Source Term “Lifting potential” of a shearing flow at the surface:
Factors: vegetation, surface consistency, supply, saltation
2 2* * *2
: airT
kgmassflux K u u u
m s g
*:Friction Velocity u
Dust Source Term
Helicopter case: more sophisticated methodneeded? Why? Highly turbulent: varying
friction velocity Significant local pressure
gradients Significant vertical
velocities Rapid saltation, source depletion
Lagrangian Particle Model
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )rx t t x t u t t u t t
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )r r u su t u t t R t u t Stochastic termDrift term
Gaussian Random Acceleration
Many Particles: Statistical Dispersion Modeling
Review of modeling scheme
1.CFD & VBM
2.Atmospheric simulation scheme
Post-processor:FiltererShear stress
4. LPM
3. Dust Source Term
Comparison to Measurement Study:#1: Correct Helicopter config.#1: Correct surface variables#2: Correct profiles#2: Real time simulation?#3: Shear stresses vs. mass#4: Downwind dispersion conc compared to measurements
Desert Rotor Entrainment Study
In planning: Summer 2007 • Military Helicopter in ground effect over desert terrain• Optical Remote Sensing- PM concentrations:
-LIDAR-FTIR
• Irwin sensors-Shear Stress
• Sonic Anemometer-Heli. flow and TKE
• Standard meteorological measurements for background
Modeling validation
Variable Comparison method
Atmospheric
conditions
-Good stable atmospheric profiles in CFD domain
-Proper simulation in LPM
Heli. Flow
Field
-Sonic anem. data compared to CFD results
-Various runs with setting/ condition tweaks
Shear Stress -CFD output of shear stress compared to Irwin sensor data
PM conc. -LPM results compared to:
ORS: distribution
Tower data: point measurements
Model Validation
Significant variations? - source decay handling?- instrument error?- simulation errors?
- atmospheric setup- shear stress calculation
- landing/take-off cycle More sophisticated model runs
- non steady state vs. steady state solution?
Conclusion:
Scientific Value of this Project:
- Better understanding of perturbation dynamics through experimental observations and modeling
- Better understanding of the perturbation dynamics relationship to dust entrainment
- Computer Modeling: Simulation of the dust source and dispersion
- Coupling of models of various scales: Mesoscale CFD LPM
Future work
Reassessment of the LPM turbulence schemes Improvement of the LPM algorithm Validation of improved model Coupled WRF-LES microscale model for
atmospheric input Other sources: artillery, fixed-wing, tracked
vehicles, wheeled vehicles