26
Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators Wei Ku Brookhaven National Lab & SUNY Stony Brook

Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer

Insulators

Wei Ku

Brookhaven National Lab & SUNY Stony Brook

Page 2: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Funding sources

Basic Energy Science, Department of Energy

DOE-CMSN

Taiwanese Student Fellowship

Theoretical works

Chi-Cheng Lee (BNL & Tamkang Univ.) about to move on

Chen-Lin Yeh (BNL & Tamkang Univ.)

Hung-Chung Hsueh (Tamkang Univ.)

Experiments

Ben C. Larson (ORNL) – PRL 2007

Igor Zaliznyak (BNL) – Nature Physics 2009

Peter Abbamonte (UIUC) – PNAS 2008

Discussions

George Sawatzky (UBC)

Adolfo G. Eguiluz (UT-Knoxville / ORNL)

Acknowledgement

Page 3: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Recent X-ray experiments

Sort wave length sensitivity to local excitations

Strong anisotropy sensitivity to orbitals orientation

Strong local interaction & short-range correlation

Local approach

Fundamental difficulty of charge-transfer insulators

Defining “local” in a crystal with “natural” symmetry

Simple understanding of anisotropy from local picture

70% missing spectral weight in INS

Treating local problem via TDDFT: TD-LDA+U

Treating local problem beyond perturbation

Propagation of local excitations

Outline

Page 4: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

In a many-body system, G1, G2, …, GN not apparently related

Band structure (or DOS) is not sufficient

At least linear response is necessary

TD-DFT: time evolution of density is legally accessible

For the Purists & the Rest

Page 5: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

s q , 1

VS q , 2 Im

G G q G ,

Non-Resonant Inelastic X-Ray Scattering (NIXS)

[hkl]

sample

Spherically Bent

Analyzer Crystal

q

UNI-CAT ID-33

7.59 keV

DE ~ 1.1 eV

Io ~ 5•1012 Hz

UNI-CAT ID-33

CHESS C-Line

DE ~ 0.3 eV

Io ~ 1011 Hz

IXS Measurement

Directions

S q , 2 V ImG ,G

q G , Absolute Response CalculationsAbsolute IXS Measurements

d2

dd

d

d

0

S q ,

d2

dd

d

d

0

S q ,

d

d

0

r02

e i e f 2 f

i

Page 6: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

40

30

20

10

0s

(q,

) (

eV

-1

nm

-3)

6543210

DE (eV)

NiO 111

2 A-1

3 A-1

4 A-1

7 A-1

New features at large q in the Mott gap!

Short wave length local excitations (small exciton)

Strong angular dependence: (100) != (111)

25

20

15

10

5

0

s(q

,

) (e

V-1

nm

-3)

302520151050

²E (eV)

NiO (1.1 eV Res.)

(111) (100)

2.0 A-1

7.0 A-1

Local Excitations in the Mott Gap in NiO

B. C. Larson et al.,PRL 2007

Page 7: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Tightly-Bound Excitons in Charge Transfer Insulators:

case study of LiF

P. Abbamonte et al.,PNAS 2008

Tightly bound exciton

Charge transfer insulator

p-h in different atoms

Frenkel or Wannier exciton ?

Simple dispersion

propagation in space/time

Inelastic X-ray scattering

Structured spectral weight

Clear dispersion at large q !

observe fs dynamics

Page 8: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Local Picture for Strongly Correlated Systems

0 local nonlocalH H V H H

V too big for perturbation

Maximize the terms in the “local” part

symmetric Wannier Representation defines “local”

Treat local part “accurately” and leave non-local part as modification

Page 9: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

How to define “local” in CT-insulators?

Periodic symmetry

Point group symmetry

Simultaneously keep both? How to split the Hilbert space?

Page 10: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Symmetric Wannier Functions for CT-Insulators

Ni

O

223 rz )(3 22 yx xy yz xz

223 rz

)(3 22 yx

s wave

O-p orbitals additional Ni-d orbitals (no double counting of O orbitals)

“local” is now defined by this “super-atom”

W. Ku et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167204 (2002).

R. L. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 026406 (2006).

W.-G. Yin et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 116405 (2006).

Page 11: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

40

30

20

10

0s

(q,

) (

eV

-1

nm

-3)

6543210

DE (eV)

NiO 111

2 A-1

3 A-1

4 A-1

7 A-1

New features at large q in the Mott gap!

Short wave length local excitations

Strong angular dependence: (100) != (111)

25

20

15

10

5

0

s(q

,

) (e

V-1

nm

-3)

302520151050

²E (eV)

NiO (1.1 eV Res.)

(111) (100)

2.0 A-1

7.0 A-1

Local Excitations in the Mott Gap in NiO

B. C. Larson et al.,PRL 2007

Page 12: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

q-dependence of Localized Excitons

d x 5

eg x 2

t2g x 3

eg x 2

a1g x 1

e’g x 2

2 21 3ge z r

2 22 3ge x y

1 1 3 1 3 2ge yz zx xy

1 : 2ga yz zx xy

2 1 3 1 3 2ge yz zx xy

EF of NiO

EF of CoO

ˆ

1

ˆ

1

, ; 1,1;1,1;1 1 1 1i ie ew L w

q x q xq q

L

L

L

I

Energy-resolved Wannier states

Page 13: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

EF

e’g

eg

Local Excitations in NoO and CoOPoint group symmetry and new selection rules

Local cubic point group symmetry

nodal directions

new selection rules

Decoupling 6D exciton WF into

sum over small number of pair

of 3D WF

Page 14: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Angular Dependence of Local Excitations

Nodal direction point group symmetry

Lack of [100] node in CoO weak symmetry breaking

B. C. Larson, Wei Ku, Tischler, Chi-Cheng Lee, et al., PRL 99, 026401 (2007)

Page 15: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Local Excitations in NoO and CoOSensitive probe of weak symmetry breaking

Lost of nodal directions : extremely sensitive to weak symmetry breaking

Visualization of symmetry breaking via Wannier functions

NiO CoO

NiO CoO

CoO NiO

Page 16: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

70% Missing Spectral Weight of INX in Cuprates

Igor Zaliznyak et al., Nature Physics 2009 (in print)

Page 17: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Charge Excitations in NoO and CoOSmall momentum transfer

Small q inter-site excitations

LDA+U approximation greatly improves the gap and line shape

Good agreement at small q in absolute unit

0 10 20 30 40

Energy (eV)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

-Im

v

0 5 10 15

Energy (eV)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6 exp

LDA

LDA+U

NiO, q ~ 0.7 /Å

Page 18: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

TDDFT via LDA+U Functional (TD-LDA+U)

vs

vext vHartree vXC vlocal Hartree vlocal Fock vd.c.

vs

G G0 G0 G

response function

1

ext ext

G GL G G

v v

I

local Fock

p-h attraction

local Hartree

Hartree

long-range screening

d.c. LDA

xcf w

L

L

IL

(Bethe-Salpeter equation)

vext [U( -1/2)-J( -1/2)]

(U-J)

vXC

C.-C. Lee, H.-C. Hsueh and Wei Ku, to be published

Page 19: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

same pair

p-h attraction

p1 h1

p1 h1

local Fock

p1 h1

p2 h2+ + +

local Hartree

p1 h1

p1 h1

Formation of Frenkel Excitons in Local Picture

Exciton energy in reasonable agreement with experiment

Strongly hybridized Frenkel excitons

p1 h1

p1 h1

bind energy ~ 8 eV

binding scattering screening

BSE:

(Wannier basis, laptop done all the job)

C.-C. Lee, H.-C. Hsueh and Wei Ku, to be published

Page 20: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Capability and Limitation of the Approximate Functional

(local Fock) (local Hartree-Fock)

scattering screening

(anti-bonding) (bonding) (anti-bonding) (bonding)

However, only 1 bonding peak along (111)

Generic problem in solving BSE with simple kernel or with QP approximation

Page 21: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Solving Local Interacting Problem Accurately

1. Map to an interacting Hamiltonian

2. Solve local part exactly

3. Add non-local part via

1) effective kinetic energy for the excitons

2) extended Hubbard X-operator (powerful but demanding)

W.-G. Yin, D. Volja and Wei Ku, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 116405 (2006).

Page 22: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Direct mapping to effective Hamiltonian

DFT : LDA+U

Wannier Function

canonicaltransformation

calculate t,U,V,J tight-binding HLDA+U

few-band Heff

effective Heffab initio full H

1

LDA+U+WF=HHF

W. Yin, D. Volja, W. Ku, PRL 96, 116405 (2006).

Applications: CMR manganites HTSC cuprates

HHF

W. Ku, H. Rosner, W.E. Pickett, R.T. Scalettar, PRL 89,

167204 (2002).

S. White, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 7472 (2002).

self-consistent

Hartree-Fock

Team

parameters

2Team

Page 23: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Super Atom for Charge Transfer Insulator

Ni

O

223 rz )(3 22 yx xy yz xz

223 rz

)(3 22 yx

s wave

Maximize the contributions of “local atom”nonlocallocal HHH

(exact) (modification)

Page 24: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Density response for super atom (eg-t2g=0.65eV)

(antibonding-type)

Page 25: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

GS

Ni eg

Ni t2g

O eg

O s

gT1

Multiplet Splitting Made Possible with MB Hilbert Space

Ni eg

Ni t2g

O eg

O s

Ni eg

Ni t2g

O eg

O s

(0.9484) (-0.2226) (0.2226)

Page 26: Simplifying Excitations in Charge-Transfer Insulators

Recent X-ray experiments

Sort wave length sensitivity to local excitations

Strong anisotropy sensitivity to orbitals orientation

Strong local interaction & short-range correlation

Local approach

Defining “local” in a crystal with “natural” symmetry

Symmetric Wannier functions

Simple understanding of anisotropy from local picture

Single p-h pair (Frenkel exciton within super atom)

70% missing spectral weight in INS

Treating local problem via TDDFT: TD-LDA+U

Easy visualization of physics, good energy scale

Generic limitation of adiabatic approximation of current ab initio approx.

Treating local problem beyond perturbation

Propagation of local excitations

p-h kinetic kernel

Summary