Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Shrimp Production Review• Professor James L. Anderson, Director, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems - University ofFlorida
• Dr. Diego Valderrama, University of los Andes, Colombia
• Dr. Darryl Jory, Editor Emeritus, Global Aquaculture Alliance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OtherMiddle East / N AfricaIndiaAmericasChinaSoutheast Asia
Source: FAO (2017).
Southeast Asia includesThailand, Vietnam, Indonesia,Bangladesh, Malaysia,Philippines, Myanmar andTaiwan.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
2006 - 2012 CAGR: 4.8%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150K
500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
4500K
5000K
MT
+3.2%
+8.8%+4.2%
Shrimp Aquaculture Production by World Region: 2000-2015 (FAO Data)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OtherMiddle East / N AfricaIndiaAmericasChinaSoutheast Asia
Sources: FAO (2017) for2000-2009; GOAL (2011-2016)for 2010-2015; GOAL (2017)for 2016-2019.
Southeast Asia includesThailand, Vietnam, Indonesia,Bangladesh, Malaysia,Philippines, Myanmar andTaiwan.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
2006-2012 CAGR: 3.6%2016-2019 Projected CAGR:
4.8%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 20190K
500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
4500K
5000KM
T
-10.4%
23.3%
-7.2%
Shrimp Aquaculture Production by World Region: 2000-2019(FAO and GOAL Data)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OtherMiddle East / Northern AfricaAmericasIndiaChinaSoutheast AsiaU.S. End-of-Year Composite Import Price
Sources: FAO (2017) for 2000-2009; GOAL(2011-2016) for 2010-2015; GOAL (2017) for2016-2019.
Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia,Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar andTaiwan.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
4500K
5000K
MT
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
USD
/lb
1,47
3,81
1
1,78
2,92
3
1,57
4,07
7
1,48
3,93
5
1,41
9,97
8
1,77
2,18
6
1,34
2,41
1
1,52
4,71
5
1,52
4,63
8
1,53
7,43
5
1,57
2,89
4
1,52
4,97
0
1,43
1,86
6
1,38
5,49
5
1,20
8,32
4
1,04
3,94
6
1,11
3,55
0
1,26
5,63
6
1,26
8,07
4
1,33
3,77
8
1,54
1,24
2
1,64
4,83
5
1,56
8,23
5
1,30
6,80
4
1,91
0,09
2
1,44
4,64
8
1,35
2,76
2
1,35
0,62
2
1,34
4,85
9
1,35
8,26
4
666,
989
718,
787
740,
925
905,
894
891,
873
814,
259
687,
628
576,
920
541,
700
494,
959
867,
861
809,
617
756,
430
701,
200
678,
20259
5,19
7
520,
75354
0,12
9
498,
964
477,
091
Shrimp Aquaculture Production by World Region: 2000-2019 (FAO and GOALData)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
FAO DataGOAL Data
Sources: FAO (2017)and GOAL (2011-2017).
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
0K
500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
4500K
5000KM
TFAO data do not reflect any major impact of
diseases in 2013.
World Shrimp Aquaculture ProductionComparing FAO and GOAL Data
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Estimate 10Estimate 9Estimate 8Estimate 7Estimate 6Estimate 5Estimate 4Estimate 3Estimate 2Estimate 1GOAL Average*FAO Estimate
Sources: FAO (2017);GOAL (2011-2017).
*Unweighted average ofGOAL estimates
0K 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K 600K 700K 800K 900K 1000K 1100K 1200K 1300K 1400K 1500K 1600K 1700K
MT
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Production of L. vannamei in ChinaEstimates Provided by GOAL Survey Respondents, 2010-2016
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Southeast AsiaChinaAmericasIndiaMiddle East / N Africa
Sources: GOAL (2013-2016)for 2012-2015; GOAL (2017)for 2016-2019.
Southeast Asia includesThailand, Vietnam, Indonesia,Bangladesh, Malaysia,Philippines, Myanmar andTaiwan.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
Southeast Asia China Americas India Middle East / N Africa
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
200K
400K
600K
800K
1000K
1200K
1400K
1600K
1800K
2000K
MT
Shrimp Aquaculture by Major Producing Regions: 2012-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
Southeast Asiaincludes Thailand,Vietnam, Indonesia,Bangladesh, Malaysia,Philippines, Myanmarand Taiwan.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
Southeast Asia China India Americas
2012-2015 2015-2019 2012-2015 2015-2019 2012-2015 2015-2019 2012-2015 2015-2019
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%Co
mpo
und
Annu
al G
row
th R
ate
-2.3%
7.7%
-2.7%
-1.5%
18.8%
11.2%
7.9%
6.4%
Shrimp Aquaculture by Major Producing Regions: 2012-2015 vs 2015-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Impact of diseases:Production decreasedsubstantially in China andThailand in 2013, with only apartial recovery expected by2019.
Production has beenfluctuating in Vietnam andIndonesia, with positivegrowth expectations by2019.
Production in India is clearlytrending upwards.
Sources: GOAL (2013-2016)for 2012-2015; GOAL (2017)for 2016-2019.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K100K
200K
300K
400K
500K
600K
700K
800K
900K
1000K
1100K
1200K
1300K
1400K
1500K
1600K
MT
Shrimp Aquaculture in Asia: 2012-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Bangladesh andMyanmar respondentsexpect lowerproduction in 2019relative to 2012.
Malaysia was stronglyaffected by EMS butthe industry isexpected to recover by2019.
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
Bangladesh Malaysia Myanmar Philippines
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
10K
20K
30K
40K
50K
60K
70K
80K
90K
MT
Shrimp Aquaculture in Asia: 2012-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Ecuador hasexperienced stronggrowth in the last fewyears.
Mexico has recoveredafter being impactedby EMS in 2013.
Although production inBrazil has hoveredaround 75,000 tons, itis expected to reach100,000 tons in 2019.
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
Ecuador Mexico Brazil
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
50K
100K
150K
200K
250K
300K
350K
400K
450K
500K
MT
Shrimp Aquaculture in Latin America: 2012-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Production inHonduras andNicaragua hasfluctuated in the mostrecent years.
Guatemala, Peru andVenezuela (despite itseconomic crisis) arepoised for furthergrowth.
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
Honduras Nicaragua Guatemala Peru Venezuela
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
5K
10K
15K
20K
25K
30K
35KM
T
Shrimp Aquaculture in Latin America: 2012-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Among the minorfarming nations inLatin America, highestexpectations forgrowth were reportedfor Panama.
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
Panama Belize Costa Rica Colombia Cuba
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K1K
2K
3K
4K
5K
6K
7K
8K
9K
10K
11K
12K
13K
14KM
T
Shrimp Aquaculture in Latin America: 2012-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Saudi Arabia isexpected to ramp upproduction of P.vannamei.
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
Saudi Arabia Egypt Madagascar New Caledonia
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
5K
10K
15K
20K
25K
30K
35K
40K
45K
MT
Shrimp Aquaculture in Other Reporting Countries: 2012-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OtherM. rosenbergiiP. monodonL. vannamei
Percentages indicatethe share of L.vannamei.
Sources: FAO (2017) for1995-2009; GOAL(2011-2016) for2010-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
4500K
5000K
MT
76.2
%
76.1
%
75.5
%
71.3
%
73.6
%
65.1
%
66.8
%
58.6
%
12.3
%
15.7
%
World Shrimp Aquaculture (including M. rosenbergii) by Species: 1995-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OtherM. rosenbergiiP. monodonL. vannamei
Percentages indicatethe share of L.vannamei.
Sources: FAO (2017) for1995-2009; GOAL(2011-2016) for2010-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
0K
500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
MT
71.2
%
71.2
%
70.8
%
66.7
%
70.3
%
60.6
%
62.6
%
52.9
%
0.2%
0.0%
Shrimp Aquaculture (including M. rosenbergii) in Asia by Species: 1995-2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OthersAkiami paste shrimp (Acetes japonicus)Argentine red shrimp (Pleoticus muelleri)Banana prawn (Penaeus merguiensis)Fleshy prawn (Penaeus chinensis)Giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon)Northern brown shrimp (Penaeus aztecus)Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis)Northern white shrimp (Penaeus setiferus)Southern rough shrimp (Trachipenaeus curvirostris)Ocean shrimp (Pandalus jordani)
Source: FAO (2017).
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
200K
400K
600K
800K
1000K
1200K
1400K
1600K
1800K
2000K
2200K
2400K
2600K
2800K
3000K
3200K
3400K3600K
MT
1,09
1,96
0
1,16
4,84
2
1,11
7,47
1
1,13
4,88
5
1,21
3,90
9
1,21
7,97
6
1,22
2,47
0
1,12
5,53
0
1,12
7,83
7
1,06
8,28
0
1,13
0,48
4
1,13
4,59
5
1,11
0,38
7
1,14
6,43
9
1,18
0,85
1
1,24
6,67
1
1,26
4,09
3
1,14
4,46
8
1,13
7,80
3
1,17
3,09
1
1,19
1,39
0
1,20
3,99
7 1,48
8,00
1
1,47
5,21
2
1,33
6,85
3
1,32
9,04
5
1,28
5,96
6
1,27
3,50
6
1,32
2,54
3
1,29
1,81
7
1,43
0,92
9
1,45
0,34
2
1,43
2,05
2
1,48
1,65
0
1,46
9,21
6
344,
824
406,
495
460,
871
459,
294
522,
414 52
1,77
4
550,
363
494,
408
499,
302
542,
974
579,
678
565,
260
626,
754
620,
649
558,
124
602,
420
573,
613
550,
297
588,
761
585,
433
556,
316
543,
992
317,
935 33
9,28
8
371,
661
345,
118
371,
705
379,
501
446,
909
418,
318
401,
732
409,
616
393,
500
345,
205
360,
794
337,
081
314,
599
349,
866
367,
887
365,
207
344,
597
349,
355
314,
984
327,
232
320,
162
367,
783
World Landings of Wild-Caught Shrimp by Species
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Capture FisheriesAquaculture
Aquaculture accounted for54% of world shrimpsupplies in 2015.
Sources: FAO (2017) andGOAL (2011, 2016).
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
China includes freshwaterproduction of L. vannamei.
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
0K500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
4500K
5000K
5500K
6000K
6500K
7000K
7500K
8000K
MT
53.7
%
51.4
%
54.2
%
52.8
%
50.2
%
27.9
%
25.8
%
World Production of Shrimp: Capture Fisheries & Aquaculture
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Others/NSP. chinensisPandalus borealisAcetes japonicusP. monodonPleoticus muelleriTrachipenaeus curvirostrisL. vannamei
L. vannamei is the most importantspecies in the world, with virtuallyall production coming fromaquaculture.
Percentages indicate the share of L.vannamei.
Sources: FAO (2017) and GOAL(2011, 2016).
M. rosenbergii is not included.
China includes freshwaterproduction of L. vannamei.
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
0K500K
1000K
1500K
2000K
2500K
3000K
3500K
4000K
4500K
5000K
5500K
6000K
6500K
7000K
7500K
8000K
MT
42.9
%
38.9
%
42.0
%
28.6
%
3.8%
World Production of Shrimp by Species: Capture Fisheries & Aquaculture Combined
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Trends in Trade
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OtherChinaEcuadorIndiaIndonesiaVietnamMexicoPeruThailandGuyana
Imports from Thailand declinedsharply (by 68%) between 2010and 2014, slightly recoveringsince then (from 65 to 75thousand tons).
India and Indonesia have becomethe top exporters to the U.S.market, accounting for 50% ofimports in 2017.
India's exports have increased ata CAGR of 35% between 2008and 2017.
Source: USDC/NMFS (2017)
*Estimate
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
*
0K
50K
100K
150K
200K
250K
300K
350K
400K
450K
500K
550K
600K
650K
MT
227,
741
135,
936
185,
783
203,
290
192,
766
183,
406
188,
867
116,
967
103,
166
194,
091
161,
335
132,
374
133,
280
115,
294
136,
176
126,
461
114,
535
109,
791
117,
114
114,
416
103,
331
153,
956
135,
185
108,
817
56,3
34
61,5
95
65,0
25
73,7
91
81,5
03
74,7
28
92,4
30 85,7
02 73,2
21
73,7
78
66,0
11
90,9
84
59,1
41
59,3
63
64,5
48
65,1
72
52,6
41 58,7
58
59,1
04
84,0
50
69,3
29
61,0
95
70,3
34
74,0
77
81,1
47
63,7
38
68,3
64
66,1
45
81,1
0057
,384
59,8
27
73,7
08
60,4
55
63,6
38
57,5
45
73,4
10
92,2
87
54,7
13
56,8
1064,7
28
66,5
51
63,8
18
79,7
60
85,8
4999,4
32
93,5
08
93,0
01
85,2
85
82,6
60
69,4
29
63,4
21
84,0
48
65,2
42
73,4
63
82,1
90
75,5
00
US Shrimp Imports: Down 12% between 2011-13, up 31% between 2013-17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
OthersBrownPinkWhite
Source: USDC/NMFS(2017)
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
0K
20K
40K
60K
80K
100K
120K
140K
160K
180K
MT
55,5
63
39,1
04
28,3
49
18,0
06
20,4
17 24,3
08
45,0
31
48,9
49
46,6
77 54,3
80
43,2
50
36,5
80
59,3
62
44,2
60
38,6
39
41,3
27
55,3
65
46,5
16
28,1
51
28,2
64
38,8
27
39,7
96
45,6
78
26,7
04
22,9
01
18,0
40
15,8
35
19,0
43
23,9
43
22,0
00
30,5
82
40,1
82
35,7
54
36,7
01 47,4
43
53,3
03
55,4
66
74,6
56
60,1
56
51,5
55
66,1
82 71,1
19 76,0
53
68,6
36
63,1
69
73,4
02 80,3
25
69,4
19
52,8
95
53,9
96
50,6
34
58,2
22
56,2
79
49,8
76
59,1
28
62,1
65
74,9
32
69,0
05
58,8
66 65,6
26
56,3
74
44,8
54
65,6
45
54,5
11
39,0
86
58,0
10
36,0
42 56,8
87
49,9
27
50,6
15
49,8
74
52,4
57
14,2
12
34,8
48
36,0
05
32,2
16
35,1
66
41,0
29
44,6
98
54,5
06
43,1
66
36,5
86
31,8
02
36,0
79
40,4
41
40,4
95
33,8
35
37,7
61
44,5
55
29,8
52
33,3
94
44,7
19
46,9
39
55,7
68
41,0
26
43,7
30
47,7
82
57,1
02
50,2
95 66,6
39
51,8
69
50,0
68
56,9
01
47,3
58
46,2
36
53,7
01
43,0
47
45,9
28
43,1
96
U.S. Landings of Wild-Caught Shrimp
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
31-40<15/lb>70/lbCompositePeeled
Real prices increasedsharply in 2013 butreturned to levels closeto the long-termaverage in 2014 and2015, remaining stableover the last 2 years.
Source: USDC/NMFS(2017)
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
2015
USD
/lb
Trends in US Shrimp Import Prices - Real Prices
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
31-40<15/lb>70/lbCompositePeeled
Nominal pricesincreased sharply in2013 and then returnedto levels somewhathigher than the averageprices observed in2003-2009.
Source: USDC/NMFS(2017)
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8U
SD/lb
Trends in US Shrimp Import Prices - Nominal Prices
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
OthersArgentinaBangladeshCanadaChinaEcuadorGreenlandIndiaMoroccoVietnam
Although the Europeanmarket has beencontracting over the last 10years, Ecuador continues toincrease its market share,from 3% in 2000 to 18% in2017.
India has also increasedshipments.
Source: Eurostat (2017)
*Estimate
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
*
0K
50K
100K
150K
200K
250K
300K
350K
400K
450K
500K
550K
600K
650K
MT
181,
976
206,
419
183,
157
197,
367
210,
524
214,
559 27
0,45
3
258,
332 24
3,86
4
240,
342
220,
138
204,
609
202,
986
198,
901
178,
835
158,
811
134,
486
133,
942
113,
523
123,
691
121,
445
49,6
92
55,4
15
61,6
89
54,4
87
58,9
34 65,5
46
71,0
99
78,3
85
68,6
31
53,4
47
55,9
20
63,8
58
75,1
19
69,2
84
77,9
68
90,0
44
87,7
70
81,4
26 91,5
55
93,0
94 95,9
05
98,7
10
69,8
09
70,0
37
74,6
92
81,6
94
83,9
85
77,9
20
77,2
37
71,6
74
70,6
30
66,5
54
59,9
03
58,4
86 53,6
72 52,6
27
51,4
47
55,4
52
58,9
59
62,5
04
56,2
41
56,1
67
58,3
21
64,0
89
80,4
24
78,7
35
77,7
27
71,9
54
52,4
92
52,8
48
European Shrimp Imports from Extra-EU Countries: Down 13% between 2010-17
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
OthersTunisiaArgentinaBelgiumChinaEcuadorIndiaNicaraguaPeruPortugal
Source: Eurostat (2017)
*Estimate
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
*
0K
20K
40K
60K
80K
100K
120K
140K
160K
180K
200K
220K
MT
100,
530
57,8
48
54,7
98
67,2
35 69,0
82
78,5
39
95,7
20
50,3
01
95,1
21
89,8
39
77,3
53
64,8
08
60,7
40
60,1
54 54,8
96
40,1
95
37,8
03
37,3
33 34,2
77
34,2
32
35,0
30
18,7
31
37,3
04
33,3
61
29,0
58
20,6
75
24,6
63
34,0
29
28,5
39
36,2
38
42,7
08 49,1
71
42,2
20
43,6
18
46,7
71 52,8
70
55,9
83
53,4
63
24,7
4424
,744
28,0
7728
,077
27,1
7727
,177
26,4
1626
,416
24,8
2724
,827
22,1
9722
,197
22,0
7222
,072 19
,336
19,3
36
19,4
90
21,5
14
27,8
51
20,4
19
23,4
86
31,5
29
28,6
87
24,6
67
29,3
00
32,0
02
32,7
50
33,7
35
Spanish Shrimp Imports: Down 16% between 2011-13,up 7% between 2013-17
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
OthersSpainBelgiumEcuadorIndiaMadagascarNetherlandsUKVenezuelaVietnam
Source: Eurostat (2017)
*Estimate
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
*
0K
10K
20K
30K
40K
50K
60K
70K
80K
90K
100K
110K
120K
130KM
T
27,9
09 33,2
81
28,1
27
29,7
52
31,3
00 32,5
25
40,5
92 41,1
99
45,3
14 45,4
67 42,3
22
36,2
69 37,3
13 34,7
34
26,0
92
25,4
00
22,2
75
21,6
95
20,9
01
20,6
29
17,5
91
11,7
88
17,8
66
14,1
54 13,0
09 14,3
31
14,0
52 18,2
16
13,7
75 12,9
45
18,4
11
12,0
49
20,4
01
17,1
54
17,8
85
15,0
33
13,1
16
12,0
55 12,4
93
21,7
88
19,6
01
24,5
29 29,8
72
29,4
61
32,0
07
30,7
48
27,7
95
11,3
3011
,330
11,2
5611
,256
12,4
0312
,403
13,1
8513
,185
14,2
2014
,220
12,9
2412
,924
12,3
4712
,347
12,4
5612
,456
12,9
25
11,3
93
10,5
94
11,3
53
9,25
8
9,11
2
9,53
2
9,34
0
9,65
9
9,71
3
9,12
6
9,16
0
9,74
0
9,19
3
9,64
4
9,77
2
9,88
3
9,61
1
9,43
3
French Shrimp Imports: Down 9% between 2010-14,up 4% between 2014-17
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52
OthersArgentinaCanadaChinaIndiaIndonesiaMyanmarRussiaThailandVietnam
The disease crisis inThailand led to anoverall decline inJapanese shrimpimports, with a partialrecovery expected in2017 driven primarilyby increased exportsfrom Vietnam.
Source: Japan Customs(2017)
*Estimate
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
*
0K
50K
100K
150K
200K
250K
300K
350KM
T
64,7
78
58,9
14 59,6
56
55,4
25
51,7
14
49,7
11
42,8
93
41,4
26
38,8
25
34,3
30
34,4
6134
,461
37,1
7237
,172
38,1
2538
,125 39
,764
39,7
64
59,2
6759
,267
50,6
0550
,605
52,9
0052
,900
50,2
8650
,286
43,1
5843
,158
35,0
4235
,042
31,7
53
34,1
6934
,169 32
,022
61,2
78
58,1
62
55,9
43
55,3
56 62,2
04
60,9
66
61,6
72 57,8
65
53,8
58
51,8
81
44,6
02
44,2
99
41,2
43
38,5
37
37,2
79
37,8
13
38,6
76
32,3
42
31,4
67
39,8
00
34,7
67
37,7
26
39,0
90
44,9
52
42,0
46
39,5
26
42,9
05
44,6
14
51,3
40
56,3
83
57,0
83
66,9
36
76,6
62
77,6
31
79,8
78
58,0
19
36,9
89
35,6
78
37,2
80 41,3
75
32,7
33
35,3
86
38,7
48
46,9
18
55,1
82
65,4
56
66,5
35
65,6
43
53,1
85
55,0
59
53,7
80
55,4
13
51,4
10
50,9
95
53,4
98
50,8
36
50,0
36
50,5
35
62,5
63
Japanese Shrimp Imports: Down 25% between 2011-15,up 13% between 2015-17
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
ExportsImports
Source: WB/WorldIntegrated TradeSolution Database(2017)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20160K
10K
20K
30K
40K
50K
60K
70K
80K
90K
100K
110K
120K
130K
140K
150K
160K
MT
(Pro
duct
Wei
ght)
37% Decreasefrom 2011 to
2016
109% Increasefrom 2011 to
2016
China - Exports and Imports of Frozen Shrimp
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
>7061-7051-6041-5031-4026-3021-2515-20<15
Source: GOAL (2017).
US Imports - HLSO Asia Americas World0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
14.7%
12.5%
13.1%
14.6%
18.6%
18.3%
16.3%
18.7%
18.1%
11.5%
16.9%
11.8%
20.6%
17.0%
20.0%
18.3%
14.3%
23.8%
16.1%
15.0%
6.7%
8.1%
8.9%
6.0%
4.0%
5.1%
6.0%
8.8%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture Production by Size Categories - Aggregate 2016
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
World 2010World 2016
Sources: GOAL (2011,2017). 15-20 21-25 26-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 <15 >70
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
24%
4.0%
2.5%
7.0%
5.1%
16.0%
8.9%
23.0%
16.1%
21.0%
20.0%
14.0%
16.9%16.3%
8.0%
1.0% 1.0%
13.1%
6.0%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture by Size CategoriesWorld 2010 vs. World 2016
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Size Category Asia Americas World
<15 Stable Decrease Stable
15-20 Stable Stable Stable
21-25 Stable Stable Stable
26-30 Stable Increase Stable / Increase
31-40 Stable / Decrease Stable Stable / Decrease
41-50 Stable / Decrease Stable Stable / Decrease
51-60 Stable Increase Stable
61-70 Stable Increase Stable
>70 Increase Decrease Increase
Expected Trends in Shrimp Aquaculture:Size Categories - Goal Survey 2017
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Other FormsBreadedCookedPeeledGreen / Head-offGreen / Head-on
Source: GOAL (2017).
US Imports Asia Americas World0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
12.6% 10.8%
23.5%
12.6%10.5%13.3%
15.0%
56.3%
13.2%
40.2%
19.3%
16.7%
17.1%
38.5%
23.8%
30.3%
24.9%
6.4%
4.5%7.3%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture by Product Form - Aggregate 2017
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Product Form Asia Americas World
Green / Head-on Decrease Increase Stable
Green / Head-off Stable Decrease Stable
Peeled Stable / Increase Stable / Decrease Stable / Increase
Cooked Stable / Decrease Stable Stable / Decrease
Breaded Increase Stable Increase
Other Forms Increase Stable / Decrease Increase
Expected Trends in Shrimp Aquaculture:Product Forms - GOAL Survey 2017
For a number ofyears, productionof green /head-on shrimpfor the Europeanand Asianmarkets has beentrendingupwards inEcuador.
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Asterisks indicate aTop 3 issue in GOAL2007 Survey.
Diseases
Seed stock quality & availability
Access to disease-free broodstock
***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal
Environmental management
***International market prices
Banned chemicals / antibiotic use
Production costs - Others
Product quality control
Feed quality and availability
Access to Credit
***International trade barriers
Production costs - Fuel
Market coordination
Conflicts with other users
Infrastructure
Public Relations Management
GOAL 2017 Survey: Issues & Challenges in Shrimp Aquaculture -All Countries
Not Important Moderately Important Extremely Important
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Access to Credit 2016
2017
Access to disease-free broodstock 2016
2017
Diseases 2016
2017
Environmental management 2016
2017
International market prices 2016
2017
International trade barriers 2016
2017
Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal 2016
2017
Production costs - Fuel 2016
2017
Production costs - Others 2016
2017
Seed stock quality & availability 2016
2017
Worldwide Top Issues & Challenges in Shrimp Aquaculture:2017 Survey vs 2016 Survey
Not Important Moderately Important Extremely Important
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Asterisks indicate aTop 3 issue in GOAL2007 Survey.
***Diseases
Seed stock quality & availability
Access to disease-free broodstock
***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal
Environmental management
Banned chemicals / antibiotic use
International market prices
Product quality control
Production costs - Others
Feed quality and availability
***International trade barriers
Access to Credit
Conflicts with other users
Production costs - Fuel
Market coordination
Infrastructure
Public Relations Management
GOAL 2017 Survey: Issues & Challenges in Shrimp Aquaculture - Asia
Not Important Moderately Important Extremely Important
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Asterisks indicate aTop 3 issue in GOAL2007 Survey.
***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal
Diseases
***International market prices
Access to disease-free broodstock
Access to Credit
Seed stock quality & availability
Production costs - Others
Production costs - Fuel
Feed quality and availability
***International trade barriers
Environmental management
Public Relations Management
Market coordination
Product quality control
Infrastructure
Conflicts with other users
Banned chemicals / antibiotic use
GOAL 2017 Survey: Issues & Challenges in Shrimp Aquaculture - Latin America
Not Important Moderately Important Extremely Important
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Diseases AsiaLatin America
International market prices AsiaLatin America
Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal AsiaLatin America
Seed stock quality & availability AsiaLatin America
Product quality control AsiaLatin America
Access to disease-free broodstock AsiaLatin America
Production costs - Others AsiaLatin America
Environmental management AsiaLatin America
Feed quality and availability AsiaLatin America
Production costs - Fuel AsiaLatin America
Access to Credit AsiaLatin America
Banned chemicals / antibiotic use AsiaLatin America
Conflicts with other users AsiaLatin America
Infrastructure AsiaLatin America
International trade barriers AsiaLatin America
Market coordination AsiaLatin America
Public Relations Management AsiaLatin America
GOAL 2017 Survey: Top Issues & Challenges in Shrimp Aquaculture - Asia vs LatinAmerica
Not Important Moderately Important Extremely Important
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Americas: morepositive than lastyear
Asia: about sameperspective as lastyear
Outlook Asia Americas Others
Strongly Agree Honduras
AgreeBangladesh, India, Myanmar,Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand
Brazil, Mexico, Peru Madagascar
Neutral / No OpinionChina, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia,
Vietnam Ecuador, Nicaragua, Venezuela New Caledonia, Saudi Arabia
Disagree South Korea
Strongly Disagree
GOAL 2017 Survey: Global economic conditions will be better in 2018 compared to 2017
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
About samepespective aslast year.
Outlook Asia Americas Others
Strongly Agree
Agree Nicaragua
Neutral / No Opinion India, Philippines, Taiwan, Vietnam Honduras, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela Madagascar
DisagreeChina, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia,Myanmar, South Korea, Thailand Ecuador New Caledonia, Saudi Arabia
Strongly Disagree Bangladesh Brazil
GOAL 2017 Survey: Feed prices will be lower in 2018 compared to 2017
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Sameperspective aslast year.
Outlook Asia Americas Others
Strongly Agree Indonesia, Taiwan
AgreeBangladesh, China, Japan, Myanmar,
Philippines, VietnamBrazil, Ecuador, Honduras, Peru,
VenezuelaNew Caledonia
Neutral / No Opinion India, Malaysia, South Korea, Thailand Mexico, Nicaragua Madagascar
Disagree Saudi Arabia
Strongly Disagree
GOAL 2017 Survey: The global shrimp market will strengthen in 2018 compared to 2017
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Conclusions
Global Shrimp Production Expectations2016-17: +2%2017-18: +5%
2016-19: +4.8% per year
Top 3 Constraints to Growth (Global & Asia):#1 Disease
#2 Seed Stock Quality#3 Disease-free Broodstock
Top 3 Constraints to Growth (Latin America):#1 Production Cost
#2 Disease#3 Market Prices
2018 - ExpectationsGenerally expect higher feed prices
Stronger shrimp markets (little more positive than last year)Better global economic conditions (little more positive than last year)
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Thank [email protected]
http://isfs.institute.ifas.ufl.edu
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
APPENDIX
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
Southeast Asiaincludes Thailand,Vietnam, Indonesia,Bangladesh, Malaysia,Philippines, Myanmarand Taiwan.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India
2012-2015 2015-2019 2012-2015 2015-2019 2012-2015 2015-2019 2012-2015 2015-2019 2012-2015 2015-2019-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Aver
age
Annu
al G
row
th R
ate
-2.7%-1.5%
-22.0%
9.8%
11.6%12.7%
3.8%4.7%
18.8%
11.2%
Shrimp Aquaculture in Asia: 2012-2015 vs 2015-2019
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Sources: GOAL(2013-2016) for2012-2015; GOAL(2017) for 2016-2019.
Southeast Asiaincludes Thailand,Vietnam, Indonesia,Bangladesh, Malaysia,Philippines, Myanmarand Taiwan.
M. rosenbergii is notincluded.
Bangladesh Malaysia Philippines Taiwan South Korea Japan Myanmar
2012
-201
5
2015
-201
9
2012
-201
5
2015
-201
9
2012
-201
5
2015
-201
9
2012
-201
5
2015
-201
9
2012
-201
5
2015
-201
9
2012
-201
5
2015
-201
9
2012
-201
5
2015
-201
9
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%Av
erag
e An
nual
Gro
wth
Rat
e
-1.4% -1.7%
12.3%
-9.3%
4.6%
0.2%
-1.0%
1.7%
29.4%
4.1%
-4.7%
3.6%
-1.8%
-4.2%
Shrimp Aquaculture in Asia: 2012-2015 vs 2015-2019
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
<1515-2021-2526-3031-4041-5051-6061-70>70
Disease problems inAsia led to theharvesting of smallersizes since 2011.
GO
AL 2
008
GO
AL 2
009
GO
AL 2
010
GO
AL 2
011
GO
AL 2
012
GO
AL 2
013
GO
AL 2
014
GO
AL 2
015
GO
AL 2
016
GO
AL 2
017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
18.0
%
10.0
%
11.0
%
13.0
%
18.0
%
16.2
%
14.1
%
17.0
%
11.9
%
12.0
%
18.6
%
10.0
%
13.0
%
16.0
%
29.0
%
30.3
%
30.3
%
23.0
%
15.0
%
15.8
%
13.0
% 15.0
%
16.0
%
14.3
%
22.0
%
19.2
%
20.2
%
21.0
%
19.0
%
24.8
%
14.7
%
17.0
%
21.0
%
20.6
%
10.0
%
12.1
%
10.1
%
15.0
%
19.0
%
17.8
%
15.0
%
21.0
%
19.0
%
18.1
%
14.0
%
10.9
%
15.0
%
7.0%
7.1%
6.7%
9.0%
8.0%
7.0%
8.1%
8.9%
9.0%
7.0%7.
1%7.0% 7.0%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture Production by Size Categories - Comparison of SurveyData for Asia
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
<1515-2021-2526-3031-4041-5051-6061-70>70
There was also atemporary trendtowards smaller sizes inLatin America in 2011and 2012.
GO
AL 2
008
GO
AL 2
009
GO
AL 2
010
GO
AL 2
011
GO
AL 2
012
GO
AL 2
013
GO
AL 2
014
GO
AL 2
015
GO
AL 2
016
GO
AL 2
017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
16.0
%
10.0
%
10.9
%
10.0
%
14.0
%
10.1
% 10.1
%
14.6
%
18.0
% 19.0
%
14.9
% 15.0
%
10.0
%10
.0%
18.2
%
16.0
%
13.1
%
18.7
%
16.0
%
20.0
%
19.8
%
22.0
%
22.2
%
19.0
%
25.3
%
25.0
%
29.0
%
23.8
%
16.0
%
19.0
%
21.8
%
23.0
%
24.2
%
21.0
%
18.2
%
19.0
% 21.0
%
17.0
%
15.0
%
13.0
%
14.9
%
12.0
%
17.2
%
18.0
%
14.1
%
11.0
% 13.0
%
11.5
%
11.0
%
10.0
%
10.0
%
9.9%
9.0%
8.1% 8.
0%8.
0%
8.0%
9.0%
7.0%
9.0%
9.0%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture Production by Size Categories - Comparison of SurveyData for the Americas
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Other FormsBreadedCookedGreen / Head-offGreen / Head-onPeeled
GO
AL 2
008
GO
AL 2
009
GO
AL 2
010
GO
AL 2
011
GO
AL 2
012
GO
AL 2
013
GO
AL 2
014
GO
AL 2
015
GO
AL 2
016
GO
AL 2
017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
22.2
%
23.0
%
13.4
%
10.0
%
10.0
%
12.6
%
11.0
%
12.1
%
24.0
%
12.0
%
23.8
%
25.0
%
18.2
%28.0
%
10.0
%
12.6
%
22.0
%
20.2
%
19.0
%
18.0
%
15.4
%
20.0
%
15.8
%
18.0
%
15.0
%
15.0
%
19.0
%
19.3
%
18.0
%
22.0
%
10.4
%
20.0
% 17.8
%
17.0
%
20.0
%
23.8
%
23.0
%24
.0%
17.0
%
33.2
%
23.0
%
29.7
%
22.0
%
22.0
%
16.7
%
35.0
%
30.3
%9.
1%
9.0%
6.9%8.
0%
9.4%
8.0%
8.0%
7.0%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture Production by Product Form - Comparison of Survey Datafor Asia
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Other FormsBreadedCookedGreen / Head-offGreen / Head-onPeeled
China seems to beincreasing itsproduction ofvalue-added productsrelative to green/peeledshrimp in the mostrecent years.
GO
AL 2
008
GO
AL 2
009
GO
AL 2
010
GO
AL 2
011
GO
AL 2
012
GO
AL 2
013
GO
AL 2
014
GO
AL 2
015
GO
AL 2
016
GO
AL 2
017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
10.0
%
15.0
%
20.0
%
20.5
%
23.8
%16
.8%
15.0
%
24.5
%
15.0
%
19.8
%
11.0
%
17.8
%
10.0
%30
.0%
12.9
%
14.0
%
17.5
%
20.0
%
15.8
%
12.7
%
14.9
%
10.5
%
25.0
% 13.0
%
21.8
%
17.0
%
20.0
%
15.0
%
13.9
%
14.7
%
12.9
%
13.5
%
30.7
%
26.5
%27
.5%
19.8
%
47.5
% 25.0
%
54.0
%
21.8
%
25.0
%
14.0
%
35.0
%
32.7
%8.
9%
9.0%
9.0%
8.0%
9.8%
9.0%
8.8%
8.9%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture Production by Product Form - Comparison of Survey Datafor China
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Other FormsBreadedCookedGreen / Head-offGreen / Head-onPeeled
The growing share ofthe green head-on formreflects an increasedpresence of Ecuadorianshrimp in European andAsian markets.
GO
AL 2
008
GO
AL 2
009
GO
AL 2
010
GO
AL 2
011
GO
AL 2
012
GO
AL 2
013
GO
AL 2
014
GO
AL 2
015
GO
AL 2
016
GO
AL 2
017
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
53.0
%
46.0
%
45.0
%
31.3
%
34.0
%
30.0
%
23.8
%
26.0
%
32.0
%
30.3
%
40.0
%
44.0
%
46.0
%
50.5
%
57.0
% 52.0
%
52.5
%
63.0
%
56.0
%
56.3
%
14.9
%
14.0
%
12.1
%
7.0%
7.0%
7.0%
6.4%
Composition of Shrimp Aquaculture Production by Product Form - Comparison of Survey Datafor the Americas
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Source: ChineseFisheries Yearbook(2017).
Percentages are shareacross 2016.
Guangdong Guangxi Shandong Fujian Hainan Other
2006 2016 2006 2016 2006 2016 2006 2016 2006 2016 2006 20160K
50K
100K
150K
200K
250K
300K
350K
400K
450K
500K
MT
36.4%
20.1%
9.7% 9.2% 9.0%
15.6%
Marine Shrimp Aquaculture in China by Region: 2006 vs. 2016
Shandong
OtherHainan
GuangxiGuangdong
Fujian
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
Farmed, C&SA White, 26-30Farmed, Southeast Asian, 26-30Premium, White - Tiger
Coinciding with falling supplies fromThailand, wholesale shrimp prices beganrising in 2010 with the sharpest increasetaking place in 2013.
Prices declined during 2014 and 2015 asother countries (India, Indonesia, Ecuador,Vietnam) increased their exports to theU.S.
Prices of BT shrimp have neverthelessincreased since early 2016, widening thepremium over white shrimp.
Source: Urner Barry (2017)
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
USD
/lb
P. Monodon vs L. Vannamei: US Wholesale Prices
