Ship Concept Advanced Design - GlobalSecurity.org · PE 0603563N: Ship Concept Advanced Design UNCLASSIFIED Navy Page 4 of 23 R-1 Line #43 Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification:

UNCLASSIFIED

PE 0603563N: Ship Concept Advanced Design UNCLASSIFIEDNavy Page 1 of 23 R-1 Line #43

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: AdvancedComponent Development & Prototypes (ACD&P)

R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0603563N / Ship Concept Advanced Design

COST ($ in Millions) PriorYears FY 2014 FY 2015

FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

Total Program Element 144.720 17.604 17.864 11.888 - 11.888 10.445 10.334 5.147 5.274 Continuing Continuing

2196: Design, Tools, Plans andConcepts

1.021 0.461 0.433 0.443 - 0.443 0.449 0.454 0.464 0.474 Continuing Continuing

3161: NAVSEA Tech Authority 143.699 17.143 11.838 11.445 - 11.445 9.996 9.880 4.683 4.800 Continuing Continuing

3376: Strategic Sealift 0.000 - 5.593 - - - - - - - - 5.593

A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationExplore alternative surface ship force structures, advanced surface ship and unmanned surface vehicles concepts, and the potential technologies for these forcestructures and advanced concepts in support of pre-acquisition mission needs analysis, mission area analysis, and planning. The objective is a more affordable, missioncapable surface ship force including increased ship production capability; ships with reduce manning, reduced operating and support costs, and greater utilization of thelatest technology. The program directly supports the Navy Shipbuilding Plan with state-of-the-art design tools and methods for surface ship force structure alternativestudies, ship & unmanned vehicle concept studies, and the actual conduct of surface ship force structure alternative studies and advanced design concept studies forthe ships that may become part of the shipbuilding plan.

Project 2196 - This project funds concept development engineering, mission effectiveness analysis, and other analyses for formulation of future surface shipforce structure along with development of the tools to accomplish these efforts. Efforts include advanced ship concept studies, ship and ship systems technologyassessments, and the development and upgrade of ship concept design and engineering tools, methods, and criteria.

Project 3161 - This project funds a prioritized portfolio of time-sensitive initiatives through integrated efforts in Cross Platform Systems Development (CPSD), furtheringSea Enterprise through the development of support elements meeting relevant needs of the warfare community. The areas of exploration for CPSD include surface shipconcept advanced development, next generation unmanned surface vehicle, high speed ships, tool integration and technical data exchange, cybersecurity, embeddedinteroperability engineering, and mission capability systems engineering. The research products developed by this project directly support and influence both immediatefleet requirements and future acquisition programs by providing a range of technically acceptable alternatives and evaluation of emerging technologies.

In particular, tasks within this project continue to directly support interoperability testing and certification for Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) and other platforms in deployingbattle groups, development and certification of Operator Guidance tools for surface combatants (CG 47, DDG 51, DDG 1000), Total Ownership Cost (TOC) pilotprograms, futureflexible and modular warship analyses, and development of specifications and processes to reduce production costs of platforms.

Tasks within this project continue to directly support the Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) execution for multiple ship classes including, LCS, JHSV, and DDG1000 reducing Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E) costs, furthered validation of hydrodynamic simulation tool supporting DDG 1000 Hull Form Plan (HFP), haveincreased technology readiness level for aluminum combatants, developed tools to execute the CG 47 Cracking Task Force recommendations, increased situational

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 4: AdvancedComponent Development & Prototypes (ACD&P)

R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0603563N / Ship Concept Advanced Design

awareness for deploying strike groups. This project supports NAVSEA's core mission and allows for improved performance and reduced cost of current and future navalplatforms.

Project 3376 - Strategic Sealift Research and Development - Develops new concepts and technologies which can be applied to or will enable future strategic sealift,and Seabasing systems. The technologies include ship configuration concepts, equipment to increase cargo handling and cargo loading/unloading rates (includingcommercial and merchant ship systems), improved man/machine interfaces, improved structural configurations and materials, and Logistics-Over-the-Shore (LOTS)equipment and system improvements. FY 2014 and earlier efforts were funded under NDSF BA 04 Project 3116 Strategic Sealift Research and Development. Effortmoves back to NDSF BA 04 Project 3116 Strategic Sealift Research and Development in FY 16.

Note: NDSF BA 04 Project 3116 Strategic Sealift Research and Development amounts: FY 2014: $6.288M

B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO FY 2016 TotalPrevious President's Budget 17.501 17.864 19.365 - 19.365Current President's Budget 17.604 17.864 11.888 - 11.888Total Adjustments 0.103 - -7.477 - -7.477

• Congressional General Reductions - - • Congressional Directed Reductions - - • Congressional Rescissions - - • Congressional Adds - - • Congressional Directed Transfers - - • Reprogrammings 0.229 - • SBIR/STTR Transfer -0.126 - • Program Adjustments - - -7.392 - -7.392• Rate/Misc Adjustments - - -0.085 - -0.085

Change Summary ExplanationProgrammatic:

Project 3161: The CPSD Program was adjusted based on reduced level of effort. Added additional funding to support increased cybersecurity technologies forapplication to emerging shipboard and combat system control system architectures and mitigate vulnerabilities across Platform IT (PIT) capabilities.

Financial: Moved project 3376 back to NDSF BA 04 Project 3116 Strategic Sealift Research and Development in FY 16.

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity1319 / 4

R-1 Program Element (Number/Name)PE 0603563N / Ship Concept AdvancedDesign

Project (Number/Name)2196 / Design, Tools, Plans and Concepts


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

2196: Design, Tools, Plans andConcepts

1.021 0.461 0.433 0.443 - 0.443 0.449 0.454 0.464 0.474 Continuing Continuing

Quantity of RDT&E Articles - - - - - - - - -

A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationThis project provides the foundation for an affordable and mission capable surface ship force. It also supports the next step in the development of a transformednaval force by accomplishing the pre-milestone A (especially pre-concept decision) efforts for all potential surface ships. These efforts are the required first step in theintegration of total ship systems, including combat systems, weapons systems and Hull, Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) systems. Inadequate early planning and shipconcept formulation can result in down-stream design, construction and operational problems. A more subtle and severely negative impact of neglecting this early effortis that the "best" concepts and technologies may never even be considered and our greatest potential ship design advances never realized. Designs and technologiesmust meet the threat. This project supports this requirement.

This project funds concept development engineering, mission effectiveness analysis, and other analyses for formulation of future surface ship force structure alongwith development of the tools to accomplish these efforts. Advanced ship concept studies, ship and ship systems technology assessments, and the development andupgrade of ship concept design and engineering tools, methods, and criteria are also funded in this project.

This project accomplishes the following: (1) Develops alternative surface ship force structure concepts including the ships and unmanned vehicles; (2) Evaluates themission capability effectiveness and costs for these alternative surface fleet architectures; (3) Performs fleet war fighting/mission effectiveness assessment studies;(4) Identifies future surface ship requirements and characteristics necessary to meet future threats and support mission needs; (5) Investigates new affordable shipconcepts and evaluates technologies necessary to support these concepts; (6) Provides design methods and automated design tools to develop and evaluate shipconcepts; and (7) Supports development of Initial Capabilities Documents (ICD) and analogous early requirements documents for future ships. These efforts are doneto support mission analysis; mission needs development and technology assessment in support of future fleet concepts and potential ship acquisition programs. Theseefforts are fundamental to the Navy's formulation of the future fleet.

Supports concept exploration and mission needs assessment for potential future ship acquisition programs, however, these are not direct efforts for specific, authorizedshipbuilding programs. This project supports and maintains this country's naval ship design and engineering capabilities in the area of very early stage (Concept Design)design tools, criteria, and methods.

B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions, Article Quantities in Each)FY 2014 FY 2015

FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Title: Ship Concepts and Mission Need AnalysisArticles:

0.391-

0.433-

0.443-

- -

0.443-

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Description: Develop ship concepts and perform analysis for potential ships and Force Architecture 5-10 yearsout in shipbuilding plan.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:Continued concept designs for small and medium surface combatants that develop agile, fuel efficient andflexible platforms capable of operating in required environments. These efforts are enabling the design of futureaffordable surface combatants with increased reliable, efficient, long range, high speed and optimized payloadcapabilities, including payloads such as unmanned vehicles.FY 2015 Plans:Developing concepts of integrating unmanned vehicles aboard surface ships. Refining cost analyses ofsurface ship design and construction. Further improvements of surface ship design tools. Continuing conceptdevelopment efforts to explore flexible, modular surface combatants.FY 2016 Base Plans:Continue improving tools that relate ship costs to ship capabilities. Explore concepts of surface ships that candeploy swarms of unmanned autonomous systems, and react to such swarms deployed by the enemy. Analyzethe impact of distributed high energy storage systems on ship design.FY 2016 OCO Plans:N/ATitle: Total Ship Technology Assessment (TSTA)

Articles:Description: Analyze the benefits and impacts of new ship, Hull, Mechanical & Electrical (HM&E) concepts,technologies and warfare systems.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:Commenced development of small scale tools to automate challenging and/or labor intensive naval architectureactivities (such as weight reports, liquid loading vs. trim scenarios) and to add capability to existing softwaretools. The products aid in the in-house technical capability of the Navy in conducting pre-AoA studies for surfaceships.FY 2015 Plans:

0.070-

- -

- -

- -

- -

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

N/AFY 2016 Base Plans:N/AFY 2016 OCO Plans:N/A

Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 0.461 0.433 0.443 - 0.443

C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions)

Line Item FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020Cost To

Complete Total Cost• RDTEN/0204202N: DDG-1000 189.580 202.517 103.199 - 103.199 20.126 13.132 - - Continuing Continuing

• RDTEN/0603512N: CarrierSystems Development

77.993 5.959 8.348 - 8.348 7.539 7.531 5.668 5.787 Continuing Continuing

• RDTEN/0603564N: ShipPreliminary Design/Feasibility

37.380 1.773 4.332 - 4.332 2.500 2.500 - - Continuing Continuing

• RDTEN/0604567N: ShipContract Design/Live Fire T&E


• RDTEN/0603582N:Combat System Integration


Remarks

D. Acquisition StrategyThis is a non-acquisition program that develops, evaluates, and validates early stages of total ship concepts and technologies in support of SCN planning and potentialfuture ship acquisition programs. This program also supports development, demonstration, evaluation, and validation of engineering tools, methods, and criteria forthose concept designs and assessments.

E. Performance MetricsQuarterly Program Reviews

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity1319 / 4



Product Development ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item

ContractMethod& Type

PerformingActivity & Location

PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

TargetValue ofContract

Systems Engineering C/CPFF Various Contractors :Various 0.400 0.090 Jun 2014 0.097 Feb 2015 0.096 Apr 2016 - 0.096 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Systems Engineering WR NSWC : Various 0.334 0.297 Nov 2013 0.275 Nov 2014 0.277 Nov 2015 - 0.277 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Engineering Development C/CPFF Various Contractors :Various 0.171 - - - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing

Engineering Development WR NSWC : Various 0.062 0.074 Nov 2013 0.061 Nov 2014 0.070 Nov 2015 - 0.070 Continuing Continuing ContinuingDemonstration &Evaluation C/CPFF Various Contractors :

Various 0.029 - - - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing

Test & Evaluation C/CPFF Various Contractors :Various 0.020 - - - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing

Subtotal 1.016 0.461 0.433 0.443 - 0.443 - - -

Management Services ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Travel Allot NAVSEA HQ :Washington, DC 0.005 - - - - - - 0.005 -

Subtotal 0.005 - - - - - - 0.005 -

PriorYears FY 2014 FY 2015

FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Project Cost Totals 1.021 0.461 0.433 0.443 - 0.443 - - -

Remarks

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-4, RDT&E Schedule Profile: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity1319 / 4



FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 20201 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Proj 2196Ship Concepts and Mission Needs AnalysisTotal Ship Technology Assesment (TSTA)

UNCLASSIFIED


Exhibit R-4A, RDT&E Schedule Details: PB 2016 Navy Date: February 2015Appropriation/Budget Activity1319 / 4



Schedule Details

Start EndEvents by Sub Project Quarter Year Quarter Year

Proj 2196Ship Concepts and Mission Needs Analysis 1 2014 4 2020Total Ship Technology Assesment (TSTA) 1 2014 4 2020

UNCLASSIFIED




Project (Number/Name)3161 / NAVSEA Tech Authority


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

3161: NAVSEA Tech Authority 143.699 17.143 11.838 11.445 - 11.445 9.996 9.880 4.683 4.800 Continuing Continuing


A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationThis project has been established to support NAVSEA Technical Authority through coordinated, collaborative, cross-platform systems development resulting inadvanced capabilities across business lines through development adaptation and extension of processes, procedures, and tools necessary to develop and explorealternative surface ship force structures; advanced surface ship and unmanned surface vehicle concepts; interoperability; and development of systems level engineeringcriteria and options to support these force structures and advanced concepts as part of pre-acquisition mission needs analysis, mission area analysis, SCN, and R&Dplanning. The objective is the coordination of ongoing early-stage concept design and development efforts for cross-platform applicability to result in more affordable,mission-capable, and interoperable surface ship forces including ships that are less expensive to build with reduced manning, reduced operating and support costs, andgreater utilization of the latest technology.

NAVSEA Tech Authority efforts under Project 3161, known as the Cross Platform Systems Development (CPSD) Program enhance ongoing efforts within Project2196 and transition directly to early-stage ship design for Ship Preliminary Design and Feasibility Studies and other Program Executive Office (PEO) ship designprograms. While these efforts support concept exploration and mission needs assessment for potential future ship acquisition programs, they are not direct efforts forspecific, authorized shipbuilding programs. This project is the only R&D effort (Government or commercial) that provides a coordinated, collaborative approach to thedevelopment of: cross-platform naval ship and weapon system design, as well as engineering capabilities in the areas of design tools, criteria, and methods. This projectalso provides innovative solutions for current Fleet issues involving Technical Authority, such as current interoperability issues with new systems or platforms.

Naval Ship System Engineering Technical Authority recapitalization and product development consolidates platform advanced concept development and design tooldevelopment in CPSD 1.0 (Platform Concept Advanced Development) and CPSD 2.0 (Platform Design and Certification Tools/Engineering and Tech Data ExchangeDevelopment); and aligned standards and requirements development for modularity and system / component commonality within CPSD 3.0 (Ship Systems Engineering/Modular Ship Systems Development). Program product areas support: platform-centric force architecture and concept development and tools (CPSD 1.0, CPSD 2.0),engineering products and system development (CPSD 3.0, CPSD 5.0), and system interoperability and mission capability for delivering ships (CPSDs 6.0, 8.0, 9.0).CPSD develops and transitions products to Technical Warrant Holder (TWH) community and develop prioritized plans and activities for future products from emergingcross platform technical requirements and associated capabilities.


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Title: Platform Concept Advanced Development (CPSD 1.0)Articles:

1.158-

1.091-

0.670-

- -

0.670-

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Description: This effort directly supports the Navy's ability to understand risk and associated cost of surfacewarfare assets; Pre-Milestone A ships, and unmanned surface vehicle (USV) design and analysis.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:Continued to develop the NAVSEA ship concept development processes for supporting the Long RangeShipbuilding Strategy (LRSS), Capability Based Analyses (CBAs), Analyses of Alternatives (AOAs), informship design policy and new technology impact assessment. Developed design space exploration methodsthat leverage previous Navy design tool investments by employing behavior models of higher fidelity. This willallow much more comprehensive trade studies in support of Capabilities Based Assessments and Analyses ofAlternatives. Continued next generation surface ship, and unmanned vehicle concept exploration.FY 2015 Plans:Exploring concepts for flexible and modular surface ships that meet Long Range Shipbuilding Strategy capabilitygoals at reduced cost. Develop concepts for surface ship designs that optimize the use of unmanned vehicles.Exploring ways to extend mission modularity concepts from LCS to other surface ship platforms.FY 2016 Base Plans:Refine concepts and support specification development for flexible and modular future surface combatants.Support the execution of cross-platform aspects of the previously-developed Flexible Warship Roadmap.FY 2016 OCO Plans:N/ATitle: Platform Design and Certification Tools/Engineering and Tech Data Exchange (CPSD 2.0)

Articles:Description: This effort supports the development of validation tools to certify the safety and mission capabilityof platform concepts and subsequently ships and submarines; establishes the integrated NAVSEA suite. Thiseffort advances platform design methods, design validation tools, cost tools, manpower tools, and tools to aid inrapid total platform definition.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:

1.775-

1.673-

1.028-

- -

1.028-

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Continued to develop tools that allow for reliable, efficient, long-range, high-speed platforms with optimizedpayload capabilities. Continued to develop early stage ship design tools supporting total ownership costreductions through enhancements of performance based cost models and manpower assessments tools.FY 2015 Plans:Developing a tool to assess the performance of a hull array sonar after loss of one or more hydrophones.Studying historical thirty year shipbuilding plans for insights into key drivers impacting fleet inventory levels, mix,and balance. Refining ship design tools to better incorporate combat system capabilities.FY 2016 Base Plans:Refine and transition hull array sonar tool. Improve ship design tools to better incorporate distributed highenergy storage systems, as well as directed energy weapons. Continue enhancement of fleet architecture andforce shaping tools to incorporate the future introduction of unmanned systems in large numbers.FY 2016 OCO Plans:N/ATitle: Ship Systems Engineering /Modular Ship Systems Development (CPSD 3.0)

Articles:Description: This effort supports Ship system development with a focus on technology transition, modularity,ship system technology integration, and design standards for new ship classes for pre-Analysis of Alternatives(AoA) studies and ongoing program of record (PoR) ship modernization.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:Continued to improve processes for technology upgrades during midlife overhauls that allow for affordablefleet/force modernization. Allowed for long term strategic use of platform and system modularity to enable anaffordable future fleet. Continued analysis of fracture mechanics assessment for failure of aluminum structureafter a cracking incident to determine inspection periodicity and temporary repair techniques for in-service CG,DDG LCS, and JHSV platforms.FY 2015 Plans:Exploring cross platform approaches to solving corrosion problems, techniques and applications not beingdeveloped by other programs. Developing the use of composite materials for use in more shipboard applications.Exploring methods to reduce the rejection rate of LM2500 turbine blades during overhaul with the intent of

2.107-

1.732-

1.064-

- -

1.064-

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

reducing overhaul costs. Exploring methods of extending propulsion shaft life through improved shaft coatingsand couplings.FY 2016 Base Plans:Analyze the logistical and engineering aspects of the application of 3D modeling and printing technology.Assess the current state of technology of robotic methods of cleaning, welding, painting, and inspectingshipboard tank and void spaces.FY 2016 OCO Plans:N/ATitle: High Speed Ships and Craft Engineering (CPSD 5.0)

Articles:Description: This effort supports the development of concepts for future high speed ships that promiseimproved mission effectiveness in mobility, survivability, and warfare mission areas.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:Continued the development of improved platform stealth and survivability. Continued to develop a R&Dengineering model to support the development, design, acquisition, R&D testing and acceptance of a futuremodular mission ice capable surface combatant. Continued the development of analytical tools, and continueda prescribed set of model tests and extensive analyses to support development of surface ship Safe OperatingEnvelope (SOE) and Heavy Weather Guidance (HWG) products. The analytical methods developed includea simulation tool required to characterize ship motions in environments not within the Navy's ability to test.Continued to support the integration of capability on the ship and associated training guidance for the ship'screw.FY 2015 Plans:Continuing development of analytical tools for the generation of surface ship Operator Guidance products.Completing and delivering surface ship HWG. Continue Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) of thesimulation tool for characterizing ship motions in environments not within ability to test. Continuing simulationruns of ship motions in prescribed environmental conditions required to develop the surface ship OperatorGuidance. Continue to support the integration of capability on the ship and associated training guidance for theship's crew. Participate in efforts to improve understanding of hydrodynamic performance of multi-hull ships.FY 2016 Base Plans:

9.546-

4.780-

3.064-

- -

3.064-

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Continue the development of analytical tools for the generation surface ship Operator Guidance products.Complete Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) of the simulation tool for characterizing ship motionsin environments not within ability to test. Complete simulation runs of ship motions in prescribed environmentalconditions required to develop the surface ship Operator Guidance. Continue to support the integration ofcapability on the ship and associated training guidance for the ship's crew.FY 2016 OCO Plans:N/ATitle: Alternative Power Systems Engineering (CPSD 6.0)

Articles:Description: This effort investigates concepts for ships with alternative power/propulsion systems evaluatingeffectiveness in mobility, survivability, and warfare mission areas.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:Completed development of a non-propagating, fire-limiting lithium ion battery.FY 2015 Plans:Evaluating pod propulsor for future ship concept design.FY 2016 Base Plans:Evaluate energy harvesting technology for mobility and primary mission systems. Investigate conceptssupporting Forward Deployed Energy (FDE) techniques for refueling unmanned vehicles.FY 2016 OCO Plans:N/A

1.148-

1.081-

0.665-

- -

0.665-

Title: Embedded Interoperability (I/O) Engineering (CPSD 8.0)Articles:

Description: Description: This effort establishes and executes a dedicated process for evaluating theinteroperability performance of warfare systems early in the acquisition cycle, prior to certification. Embedded I/O ensures that fewer mission critical system failures degrade the ultimately fielded war fighting capability. Focuson emerging Open Architecture warfare systems, including LCS Class.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:

0.519-

0.642-

0.355-

- -

0.355-

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Continued the focus on development of high performance, low cost communication solutions for improvedinformation dominance and interoperability.FY 2015 Plans:Exploring methods of further reducing costs of achieving certified interoperable systems. Exploring ways tostandardize and reduce the number of surface electro-optic and infrared systems and their interfaces. Furtherimproving the generation of strike group interoperability and the generation of Capabilities and Limitationsdocuments.FY 2016 Base Plans:Develop concepts making use of virtual reality and automated data assistants to lessen the information overloadproblem for ship combat system operators.FY 2016 OCO Plans:N/ATitle: Mission Capability Systems Engineering (CPSD 9.0)

Articles:Description: This effort supports the development of force-level systems engineering criteria and guidance atthe Systems of Systems (SoS) and Family of Systems (FoS) level. This effort allows for the enhanced warfighterand system performance with reduced personnel costs.

FY 2014 Accomplishments:Created a federated network architecture (combat systems, HM&E, and C4I) in future Surface Combatants withthe focus on integration into both LCS classes.FY 2015 Plans:Complete federated network architecture study that enhances and aligns combat system and operationsprocedures. Assess certified cybersecurity technologies for application to emerging shipboard and combatsystem control system architectures.FY 2016 Base Plans:Study the concepts of modularity and open architecture in combat systems and propose parallel conceptsfor hull, mechanical, and electrical systems. Study advanced cybersecurity technologies for application toshipboard, and other naval combatant systems.FY 2016 OCO Plans:

0.890-

0.839-

4.599-

- -

4.599-

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

N/AAccomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals 17.143 11.838 11.445 - 11.445



BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016


Complete Total Cost• RDTEN/0204202N: DDG-1000 189.580 202.517 103.195 - 103.195 20.126 13.132 - - - 1,755.677

• RDTEN/0603512N: CarrierSystems Development


• RDTEN/0603564N:Ship Preliminary Design/

Feasibility Studies

37.380 1.773 4.332 - 4.332 2.500 2.500 - - Continuing Continuing

• RDTEN/0604567N: ShipContract Design/Live Fire T&E


• RDTEN/0603582N:Combat System Integration


Remarks

D. Acquisition StrategyThis is a non-acquisition program that develops, evaluates, and validates early stages of total ship concepts and technologies in support of SCN planning and potentialfuture ship acquisition programs. This program also supports development, demonstration, evaluation, and validation of engineering tools, methods, and criteria forthose concept designs and assessments. This program provides validated engineering tools, methods, and criteria for ship, and weapon system concept designs andassessments while fostering collaboration and coordination of efforts resulting in more effective use of funding.

E. Performance MetricsQuarterly Program Reviews

UNCLASSIFIED






BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Systems Engineering C/CPFF Various Contractors :Various 15.666 1.400 May 2014 1.400 Feb 2015 1.120 Feb 2016 - 1.120 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Systems Engineering WR NSWC, NUWC,CDSA : Various 52.625 5.845 Mar 2014 4.359 Dec 2014 5.412 Dec 2015 - 5.412 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Engineering Development C/CPFF DRS : Stevensville,MD 2.769 0.444 Feb 2014 0.036 Dec 2014 0.010 Dec 2015 - 0.010 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Engineering Development WR NSWC, NUWC :Various 45.074 4.941 Mar 2014 3.450 Dec 2014 3.472 Dec 2015 - 3.472 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Demonstration &Evaluation WR NSWC : Various 17.603 1.173 Mar 2014 1.268 Nov 2014 0.500 Nov 2015 - 0.500 Continuing Continuing Continuing

Demonstration &Evaluation WR SPAWAR : Various 1.922 - Mar 2014 - Mar 2015 - - - Continuing Continuing Continuing

Test and Evaluation WR NSWC : Various 7.295 3.310 Nov 2013 1.305 Nov 2014 0.921 Nov 2015 - 0.921 Continuing Continuing ContinuingSubtotal 142.954 17.113 11.818 11.435 - 11.435 - - -

Management Services ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016

BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


PM/Travel Allot NAVSEA HQ :Washington, DC 0.600 0.030 Oct 2013 0.020 Oct 2014 0.010 Oct 2015 - 0.010 Continuing Continuing Continuing

DAWDF Various Not Specified : NotSpecified 0.145 - - - - - - 0.145 -

Subtotal 0.745 0.030 0.020 0.010 - 0.010 - - -


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Project Cost Totals 143.699 17.143 11.838 11.445 - 11.445 - - -

RemarksAward Dates reflect estimated completion of incremental funding execution.

UNCLASSIFIED





FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 20201 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Proj 3161Platform Concept Advanced DevelopmentPlatform Design and Certification Tools/Engineering and Tech Data ExchangeDevelopmentShip Systems Engineering/Modular ShipSystems Development (PNA)High Speed Ships and Craft Engineering(HFP)Alternative Power Systems EngineeringEmbedded Interoperability EngineeringMission Capability Systems Engineering

UNCLASSIFIED





Schedule Details


Proj 3161Platform Concept Advanced Development 1 2014 4 2020Platform Design and Certification Tools/Engineering and Tech Data ExchangeDevelopment 1 2014 4 2020

Ship Systems Engineering/Modular Ship Systems Development (PNA) 1 2014 4 2020High Speed Ships and Craft Engineering (HFP) 1 2014 4 2020Alternative Power Systems Engineering 1 2014 4 2020Embedded Interoperability Engineering 1 2014 4 2020Mission Capability Systems Engineering 1 2014 4 2020

UNCLASSIFIED




Project (Number/Name)3376 / Strategic Sealift


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO


Cost ToComplete

TotalCost

3376: Strategic Sealift - - 5.593 - - - - - - - - 5.593


A. Mission Description and Budget Item JustificationProject 3376 - Strategic Sealift Research and Development - Develops new concepts and technologies which can be applied to or will enable future strategic sealift,and Seabasing systems. The technologies include ship configuration concepts, equipment to increase cargo handling and cargo loading/unloading rates (includingcommercial and merchant ship systems), improved man/machine interfaces, improved structural configurations and materials, and Logistics-Over-the-Shore (LOTS)equipment and system improvements.

Effort moves back to NDSF BA 04 Project 3116 Strategic Sealift Research and Development in FY 16.


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Title: Shipboard Crane Systems/Shipboard Cargo SystemsArticles:

FY 2014 Accomplishments:N/AFY 2015 Plans:FY15 - Continued investigation and demonstration of shipboard crane/cargo systems improvements.FY 2016 Base Plans:N/AFY 2016 OCO Plans:N/A

- -

1.250-

- -

- -

- -

Title: Sealift Concept DevelopmentArticles:

FY 2014 Accomplishments:N/AFY 2015 Plans:

- -

1.283-

- -

- -

- -

UNCLASSIFIED






FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

FY15 - Continued providing Advanced Planning, Sealift Research, and Technology development and programguidance.FY 2016 Base Plans:N/AFY 2016 OCO Plans:N/ATitle: Lighter/HSV Seabase to Shore Cargo Transfer

Articles:FY 2014 Accomplishments:N/AFY 2015 Plans:FY15 - Continued development and demonstration of at-sea vehicle transfer capability.FY 2016 Base Plans:N/AFY 2016 OCO Plans:N/A

- -

3.060-

- -

- -

- -

Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals - 5.593 - - -



BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016


Complete Total Cost• NDSF/3116: Strategic SealiftResearch and Development

6.288 - 5.502 - 5.502 5.523 5.773 5.898 6.017 Continuing Continuing

Remarks

D. Acquisition StrategyNot applicable for SEALIFT R&D efforts.

E. Performance MetricsAnnual Program Review.

UNCLASSIFIED






BaseFY 2016

OCOFY 2016

Total

Cost Category Item



PriorYears Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

AwardDate Cost

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Sealift ConceptDevelopment WR Various Contractors :

Various 0.000 - 1.283 Jan 2015 - - - - 1.283 -

Shipboard Crane Systems WR Various Contractors :Various 0.000 - 1.250 Jan 2015 - - - - 1.250 -

Lighter/HSV Seabase toShore Cargo Transfer WR Various Contractors :

Various 0.000 - 3.060 Jan 2015 - - - - 3.060 -

Subtotal 0.000 - 5.593 - - - - 5.593 -


FY 2016Base

FY 2016OCO

FY 2016Total

Cost ToComplete

TotalCost


Project Cost Totals 0.000 - 5.593 - - - - 5.593 -

RemarksFY2014 and earlier efforts were funded under NDSF BA 04 Project 3116 Strategic Sealift Research and Development. Due to Congressional direction to fund Sealiftrequirements in NDSF, beginning FY2016, Strategic Sealift Research and Development will move back to NDSF BA 04 Project 3116 from PE 0603563N PU3376.

UNCLASSIFIED





FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 20201 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Proj 3376Shipboard Crane Systems/Shipboard CargoSystemsSealift Concept DevelopmentLighter/HSV Seabase to Shore CargoTransfer

UNCLASSIFIED





Schedule Details


Proj 3376Shipboard Crane Systems/Shipboard Cargo Systems 1 2015 4 2015Sealift Concept Development 1 2015 4 2015Lighter/HSV Seabase to Shore Cargo Transfer 1 2015 4 2015