Shark Detection and Warning System

•Michael Beeler

–Program Manager

•Miriam Lindhorst

–Webmaster

•Marino Angeles

–Planning

•Vincent Lieu

–Testing

•Andrae Marable

–Budget

•Nathan Reeves

–Marketing

http://www.cs.odu.edu/~cpi/fall2001/sdws/

2

AbstractOceanfront resort cities in the United States have enjoyed

steady growth in direct tourism revenue for the past ten years. This growth has resulted in greater numbers of ocean swimmers taking advantage of resort beach facilities.

Unfortunately, this increase in swimmer activity has been accompanied by a proportional rise in shark attack incidents. Shark attacks during the twentieth century show a rate of increase which correlates with the population increase near the shore.

Over the next three years, our team will research and develop the Shark Detection and Warning System (SDWS) to warn swimmers of possible attack and protect oceanfront revenues. The SDWS will provide resort city managers with a warning of shark presence and an accompanying probability of attack.

ProblemOcean swimmers are concerned with the possibility of shark attack while swimming.

The Solution?

HF SONAR tracking Environmentally friendly Aesthetically pleasing Safe “Off the shelf” parts Proven technology Proven effectiveness

8

Bottom LineSchedule – 3 yearsBudget – $3,000,000

Profit – 3rd unit

9

Why?

Why will the project take so long?

Why does it cost so much?

Why don’t we see profit until the 3rd unit?

10

Ideal Location

Area with natural barriers Single point of entry Narrow opening Coverage with 1 or 2 sensors

13

Realistic Location

Long, straight beaches Florida, north/south

beaches Requires sensor array One mile sections to be

effective

14

15

SONAR Processing

SM-2000 SM-2000 SM-2000 SM-2000 SM-2000

Control House

Power Supply

Operator 1 Operator 2 Operator 3

17

Project Implementation Plan

Functional Specifications Prototype and Funding

Demonstration Production / Installation of Unit 1 Follow-on Production

18

Phase I

Preliminary Research: Preliminary Research: Start : 28-Aug Start : 28-Aug End: 18-SepEnd: 18-Sep16 days16 days

Determine Feasibility: Determine Feasibility: Start : 03-Oct Start : 03-Oct End: 16-OctEnd: 16-Oct10 days10 days

Determine Milestones: Determine Milestones: Start : 17-Oct Start : 17-Oct End: 08-NovEnd: 08-Nov17 days17 days

Gain Approval: Gain Approval: Start : 09-Nov Start : 09-Nov End: 06-DecEnd: 06-Dec20 days20 days

Develop Phase I Plan: Develop Phase I Plan: Start : 19-Sep Start : 19-Sep End: 02-OctEnd: 02-Oct10 days10 days

19

Phase II

Finalize Specifications: Finalize Specifications: Start : 07-Jan Start : 07-Jan End: 18-JanEnd: 18-Jan10 days10 days

Build Simulation: Build Simulation: Start : 19-Jan Start : 19-Jan End: 15-MarEnd: 15-Mar40 days40 days

Test Simulation: Test Simulation: Start : 16-Mar Start : 16-Mar End: 30-AprEnd: 30-Apr32 days32 days

Funding Demonstration: Funding Demonstration: Start : 07-Jan Start : 07-Jan End: 30-AprEnd: 30-Apr92 days92 days

20

Phase III

Final Management Plan: Final Management Plan: Start : 13-May-02 Start : 13-May-02 End: 01-Jul-02End: 01-Jul-0236 days36 days

Software Development: Software Development: Start : 02-Jul-02 Start : 02-Jul-02 End: 09-May-03End: 09-May-03224 days224 days

Set up /Administer Contracts: Set up /Administer Contracts: Start : 02-Jul-02 Start : 02-Jul-02 End: 19-Mar-04End: 19-Mar-04449 days449 days

Installation and Testing: Installation and Testing: Start : 01-Jul-03 Start : 01-Jul-03 End: 19-Mar-04End: 19-Mar-04166 days166 days

Shift to Production: Shift to Production: Start : 22-Mar-04 Start : 22-Mar-04 End: 12-Mar-04End: 12-Mar-0438 days38 days

21

BudgetProfit Plan

Mile Charge Cost Profit Cumulative1 $2,200,000 $3,000,000 -$800,000 -$800,0002 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 -$300,0003 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $200,0004 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $700,0005 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $1,200,0006 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $1,700,0007 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $2,200,0008 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $2,700,0009 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $3,200,00010 $2,200,000 $1,700,000 $500,000 $3,700,000

Totals $22,000,000 $18,300,000 $3,700,000

P1 1000 Preliminary Research 16 Days $4,308 28-Aug 18-SepP1 2000 Develop Phase I Plan 10 Days $16,692 19-Sep 2-OctP1 3000 Determine Feasibility 10 Days $16,692 3-Oct 16-OctP1 4000 Determine Milestones 17 Days $28,377 17-Oct 8-NovP1 5000 Gain Approval 20 Days $33,385 9-Nov 6-Dec

P1 Total $99,454

P2 0000 Finalize Specifications 10 Days $11,308 7-Jan-02 18-Jan-02P2 1000 Build Simulation 40 Days $45,231 19-Jan-02 15-Mar-02P2 2000 Test Simulation 32 Days $36,185 16-Mar-02 30-Apr-02P2 3000 Funding Demonstration 92 Days $49,538 7-Jan-02 30-Apr-02

P2 Total $142,262

P3 1000 Final Management Plan 36 Days $60,092 13-May-02 1-Jul-02P3 2000 Software development 224 Days $609,108 2-Jul-02 9-May-03P3 3000 Set up / Administer Contracts 449 Days $108,796 2-Jul-02 19-Mar-04P3 4000 Installation and Testing 166 Days $451,392 01-Aug-03 19-Mar-04P3 5000 Shift to Production 38 Days $63,431 22-Mar-04 12-May-04

P3 Total $1,292,819

Phase I Resource/Office costs $61,292

Phase II Resource/Office costs $45,292

Phase III Resource/Office costs $208,061

Phase III Hardware costs $1,150,000

Bottom Line $3,000,000

23

Production Schedule

Code Task CostPX 1000 Software development 80 Days $217,538PX 2000 Set up / Administer Contracts 130 Days $31,500PX 3000 Installation and Testing 90 Days $244,731

Office $57,660Hardware $1,150,000.00

Total $1,701,429

24

Contractual Aspects Kongsberg Simrad Mesotech Ltd.

Purchase of five SM2000 multi-beam SONAR systems.

Mooring Systems Inc. Purchase of five Bottom-mount instrument frames.

Site Specific Contracts Horizontal Boring Services Office Trailer Leasing

25

Other Requirements Control House Placement and Maintenance Purchase and Placement of Audible Warning

System

Purchase and Placement of Warning Flags Purchase and Maintain Marker System Implement Educational Measures

26

Risk Management Plan

• Inability to secure an investment

•Not enough clients

• Problems with Prime contractor

• Competitors

• Legal risks

27

Corporate Management Plan

M iriam L in d h ors tW eb m as te r

A n d rae M arab leB u d g et

N ath an R eevesM arke tin g

M arin o A n g e lesP lan n in g

V in cen t L ieuR esearch

M ich ae lP rog ram M an ag er

28

Corporate Management Plan

Project Manager

BudgetWebmasterResearch andDevelopment

Contracts

Developers Technical Writer

Marketing

Maintenance andLogistics

DatabaseAdministrator

29

Test PlanModule &Test case No.

Criteria for Test Case Scenario

Expected Outcome

Test Case Actual Results

Comments Date/TimeTester

Test case #1:Sonar Head with Transducer   

With version ranging from 60 to 180 degrees, Sonar head covers the specified degree with a maximum of 128 beams.  

Minimum of 60 degree coverage.  

Selected test input data will be provided.

Pass Fail    

90 kHz and 400 m range

Ensure operating as specified

Selected test input data will be provided.

     

To provide ping rate up to 20/second  

Ping rate of 20/second or less

Selected test input data will be provided.

Pass Fail    

30

Evaluation Plan Program Design Review (PDR) Critical Design Review (CDR) Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Customer Acceptance Test

(CAT)

Marketing Plan

• 420 years of data

• United States and Australia

33

Strategy Direct Mailings Radio Trade Journals Word of Mouth Demonstrations Internet

34

Funding Plan (Corporate) EDO Corporation General Electric Raytheon Atlas-Krupp Thompson Electronics General Dynamics Klein Associates Inc. Lockheed Martin Northrop-Grumman

35

Funding Plan (Other)

State Task ForceCIT Group

A school of fish approaching a net and avoiding it.

10

15

20

SHARK

THREAT

BEARING:

060º

RANGE:

200m

COURSE:

160º

SPEED:

4k

R EXTENT:

25m

B EXTENT:

22º

GRID X: 0CGRID Y: 08

N S

E

W