11
Supportive Feedback

Session 8 Feedback

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Feedback

Citation preview

PowerPoint Presentation

Supportive Feedback

Johari WindowJoseph Luft and Harrington Ingham I can learn more about my blind areaI can expose and share the hidden areaI can explore my area of unknown activity

FeedbackOpening up

Fundamental attribution errorSelf-serving bias Halo effectFalse consensus biasCognitive dissonanceProjectionConfirmation biasIn group Out group bias

Cognitive biases are psychological phenomena that distort our perceptions, memory, or judgment. When success depends on accurate perception, evaluation, or recollection of what's around us, distortions can lead to erroneous results that range from harmless to catastrophic.

Fundamental attribution error: The relative contributions to behavior of situational and dispositional factors, andtheir distinction is the defining feature of attribution theory. People may make inferences about the dispositions of others even when situational forces explain the behavior quite nicely. In other words when it comes to other people, we tend to attribute causes of unfavourable outcomes to internal factors such as personality characteristics and ignore or minimize external variables.

2.A self-serving bias is any cognitive or perceptual process that is distorted by the need to maintain and enhance self-esteem. When individuals reject the validity of negative feedback, focus on their strengths and achievements but overlook their faults and failures, or take more responsibility for their groups work than they give to other members, they are protecting the ego from threat and injury.

3.The Halo Effect is a cognitive bias that causes our evaluation of people, concepts, or objects to be influenced by our perceptions of one attribute of those people, concepts, or objects.

Status affects persuasivenessAssessments of the validity of someone's assertions can be affected by our perception of her or his status. Hat hanging The name evokes the idea that we hang the hat of someone from our past on someone in our present.

4.False Consensus Bias: refers to the tendency of people to overestimate the level to which other people share their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors.

Cognitive Dissonance: Dissonance and consonance are relations among cognitions that is, among opinions, beliefs, knowledge of the environment, and knowledge of one's own actions and feelings. Two opinions, or beliefs, or items of knowledge are dissonant with each other if they do not fit together; that is, if they are inconsistent, or if, considering only the particular two items, one does not follow from the other (Festinger 1956: 2)

There are three ways to deal with cognitive dissonance.One may try to change one or more of the beliefs, opinions, or behaviors involved in the dissonance;One may try to acquire new information or beliefs that will increase the existing consonance and thus cause the total dissonance to be reduced; or,One may try to forget or reduce the importance of those cognitions that are in a dissonant relationship

6. Projection Bias: The tendency to unconsciously assume that others (or one's future selves) share one's current emotional states, thoughts and valuesComplementary projectionis assuming that others do, think and feel in the same way as you. Thus we see our friends as being more like us than they really are.Complimentary projectionis assuming that others can do things as well as you.

7. Confirmation bias: One selectively gathers, or gives undue weight to, evidence that supports one's position while neglecting to gather, or discounting, evidence that would tell against it.This gets manifested in two ways: building a case consciously and deliberately and engaging in case-building without being aware of doing so.Restriction of attention to a favored hypothesis.Preferential treatment of evidence supporting existing beliefs. Selective memory

Effective FeedbackFocus on behaviorFrequentTimely Specific- give examplesTalk about repercussions of that behavior and way forwardDont restrictively frame the feedback. Restricted feedback is narrow, binary and frozen

Giving and receiving feedback is personal and can be charged with high levels of emotions for both- giver and receiverWe avoid feedback because of self serving and actor-observer biasInaccurate positive self-perceptionsAccepting critiques undermines their self efficacy and self esteem Flawed Feedback

Attacks the Person Rather Than the Persons BehaviorVague or Abstract AssertionsWithout illustrationsIll-defined context and range of applicationUnclear impact and information regarding remedial actions or behavioural changes desiredFalse consensus bias

Cannon, M.D., & Witherspoon, R. (2005). Actionable feedback: Unlocking the power of learning and performance improvement. Academy of Management Executive, 2005, 19 (2): 120-134